Re: [Repeater-Builder] Used Cat-200 or Arcom anyone?

2009-11-29 Thread wa2ar
Hi Brian,

How much are you looking for?  Thank you,
Ala
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Brian 
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:25:50 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Used Cat-200 or Arcom anyone?


I have a Linker IIa...

73
Brian
ka9pmm


rock7555101p wrote:

Hi,
>
>
> Putting up a UHF VXR-7000. I'll need a controller to allow DTMF remote 
> operation and control, Anyone have a used one they might want to sell?
> Please email me offlist. mycalls...@earthlink.net 
> <mailto:mycallsign%40earthlink.net>.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan WA2AR
>
> 
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.426 / Virus Database: 270.14.86/2533 - Release Date: 11/28/09 
> 19:34:00
>
>   







Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: preamp

2009-11-26 Thread wa2ar
Most people gas after their fed.

Alan
  - Original Message - 
  From: W3ML 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 11:37 AM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: preamp



  I just read back what I typed while XYL was talking to me. You could tell I 
missed breakfast and she was talking about food as it is not a gas fed, but 
GaAS FET preamp.

  Now only 4 more hours before I get fed.

  Have a great holiday.
  73
  John



  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement

2009-11-26 Thread wa2ar
Anyone have a spare bandpass filter tunable for the UHF amateur band like a DCI?

Thanks!

Alan
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mike Dietrich 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:09 AM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement




  The main way of thinking is that you want to put the pre-amp after the band 
pass filter.
  The reason for this is that if it is before the b/p filter, it amps anything 
it sees, noise and unwanted stuff alike.
  If its behind the b/p filter, it only amps the signals that are left and need 
it.

  You might need to add a several DB attenuator between the pre amp and the 
receiver to keep from overdriving the front end.

  Advanced Receiver Research makes very good low noise preamps as so do several 
other companies.

  Hope this helps,
  Mike 
  Specialized Communications
  KB5FLX

- Original Message - 
From: skipp025 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 11:36 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: pre-amp placement


  


Hello John, 

> "W3ML"  wrote:
> Hi, 

not since high school... :-) 

> I have now read two different things about where to put 
> the pre-amp.

Only two?

> One says before the Bandpass and one after.
> What I have now is the 6 can duplexer is hooked to the 
> bandpass and then on the other side the pre-amp is 
> connected and then a cable goes from preamp to radio.

> The other article I read this past week says the preamp 
> should go between the cans and the bandpass.

> Which is right? Or does it matter?

Depends and it does matter... based on how busy your radio 
site is, where any other rf activity is relative to your 
frequency, the type of preamplifier, how it's constructed, 
your receiver front end, your duplexer type with number of 
cavities, your Tx Power level and a few other tidbits... 

got a headache yet? 

I'd venture to say... if your receiver front end is 
of decent Q (quality) and reasonably narrow band-width 
along with a decent duplexer... then the preamp might 
best go after the duplexer, between it and the band-pass 
cavity. 

If your receiver front end is average or fairly broad (a 
few MHz band-width) there might be a case to include the 
extra band pass cavity after the preamp before the 
receiver input. Some of this option depends on the duplexer 
and TX Power Level. 

The point of what I write above is about trying to obtain 
the best overload prevention performance and or damage 
control when the preamplifier is overloaded and generating 
unwanted signals. 

Many but not all the variables are are in the list. 

You could of course try both positions and measure the 
system performance. 

s. 




  

[Repeater-Builder] Service Monitor FS

2009-09-11 Thread wa2ar
Hi guys,

I have a Schlumberger Wavetek 4015 Service Monitor for sale. The unit works 
fine and is not beat up. It is a Stabilock. I have the manual as well. Any 
interest you can email me off the group @ wa...@earthlink.net.

This is a 1995 or 96 Model with LCD screen.

Thanks!

ALAN
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Shanon KA8SPW 

Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:07:02 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] SMA jack Tools


  
 
 
 
 Hi Guys,
 
   I buy used nut drivers at garage sales when ever I see them.  Cut the hex 
end off then use a grinder or Dremel tool to remove most of the tube to leave 
the points you need.  You can also try to buy them from the manufacturers. 
 
 Shanon KA8SPW
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Closed Repeaters

2009-07-28 Thread wa2ar
Adam that was funny! Thanks for that.
Have fun,

Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "Adam" 

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:48:38 
To: 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Closed Repeaters


> 
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alan Rabin
> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 1:57 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Closed Repeaters
> 
> 
>   
> 
> Please excuse Me. I feel compelled to make this one comment. Consider for a
> moment the fact that when one employs a repeater, they are effectively
> sitting on two Amateur frequencies within a given geographic area. If I were
> to claim two Amateur frequencies let's say for instance on the HF band, and
> tell others they cannot use them what would most of us say? 

I for one would say you were working split.

  73!
   -Adam
WJ4X




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: HT750 vs CP200

2009-07-05 Thread wa2ar
Personally I think the CP200 Is not a very good radio. The HT750 is decent but 
the battery design stinks as the release tabs frequently seize and make it so 
you have to pry the battery off ruining it. There are also the code plug 
problems on both that make the radio a doorstop until sent back for flat rate. 
I don't know why but we do see quite a few corrupt codeplugs these days. I like 
the ICOM IC-F24 For an entry level radio or the Kenwood TK-180 series for a 
higher tier. Also the motorola PR-860 is a good choice. To me the good motorola 
radios start at the PR-860. Stay away from the ICOM F-21. That is really a 
cheap radio and won't last.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: MCH 

Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:15:24 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: HT750 vs CP200


I would stick with the GP300s. The CTCSS/CDCSS decode on the HT750s 
absolutely stinks. You miss the first word or more on them while the 
GP300s get every syllable. I'm not sure how Motorola lost the ability to 
design a proper decode circuit, but all of the recent offerings have 
been weak in the CTCSS/CDCSS (PL/DPL for the purists) department.

Joe M.

tahrens301 wrote:
> Hi agrimm,
> 
> I've got a HT750 & HT1250, and they are both pretty
> good radios.  I've had the volume control fail, (actually
> one leg had a cold solder joint).  That's for over 5 years of
> operation.
> 
> The LI-Ion batteries do pretty well.. lot's lighter than
> the ni-mh.  They seem to last about a year in normal
> use all day & charge overnight.  (use for FD/EMS)
> 
> A drawback that most Mot radios seem to have is that
> they aren't waterproof, which may or may not make any
> difference to you.
> 
> If you are looking for alternatives, we have been using
> the IC-F50Vs for about 4 years, and have had pretty good
> luck with them (about 30 units).  They are 'waterproof' to
> 30 minutes, 3 meters - which suits our purposes.
> 
> If you do your own programming, the software is way less
> expensive than the Mot solution.
> 
> Just my 2cents. (most all my radios are Mot).
> 
> Tim  W5FN
> 
> 
> 
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "agrimm0034"  wrote:
>> I am looking for a nice, durable radio to add to my repeater system. I need 
>> around 16 channels and my top choices are 1 HT750 2 CP200 3 the ICOM IC-F21. 
>> The reason why I like Motorola is because of their durability and I own a 
>> GP300 and have never had problems with it. Could I get some opinions on 
>> which one to go with or some other radios of recomendation for my purpose
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.4/2218 - Release Date: 07/04/09 
> 17:55:00
> 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Mototrbo Repeaters Linked

2009-07-04 Thread wa2ar
If you reduce the power enough even a Ritron repeater can be 100 percent duty 
cycle. This means nothing.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "rahwayflynn" 

Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:34:05 
To: 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Mototrbo Repeaters Linked


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, w...@... wrote:
>
> I do believe that Mototrbo is 6.25 compliant because of the two voice  
> channels in a 12.5kHz slot.
> Glenn

The Mototrbo upgrade for the MTR2000 station is also 100% duty cycle CCS (at 
reduced power from what I understand)

Martin





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Mototrbo Repeaters Linked

2009-07-04 Thread wa2ar
Mototurbo cannot operate in mixed mode analog and digital simultaneously NXDN 
can. Mototurbo does not use open standard technology and limits your choice to 
Only Motorola. NXDN is Kenwood and ICOM and soon others.  Mototurbo does not 
offer 2 Tone paging NXDN does. Mototurbos use of two voice paths on 12.5 does 
not qualify as 6.25 Khz compliant. Please advise me where in the Mototurbo 
software it allows you to choose a 6.25 khz emission as I have not seen it.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: w...@aol.com

Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 20:19:24 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Mototrbo Repeaters Linked


I do believe that Mototrbo is 6.25 compliant because of the two voice  
channels in a 12.5kHz slot.
Glenn
**A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221323013x1201367230/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=
JulystepsfooterNO62)



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna separation for UHF repeater operation

2009-05-31 Thread wa2ar
20ft. Vertical separation assuming vertically polarized omni antennas are used.

Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Aisen Lopez 

Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 18:16:14 
To: 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna separation for UHF repeater operation


Hello:

I realize this question must be "old boring stuff" nonetheless I will ask it.  
I'm planning on installing a GMRS repeater and I would like to use two antennas 
instead of a Duplexer/Antenna combination.  What would be a good separation 
distance for a standard Split of 5 MHZ, two 5 dB antennas an 35 Watts of power?.

Thanks in advance... 



  


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250

2009-05-30 Thread wa2ar
Its called add conventional personalities to zone. If you are in conventional 
mode. If operating LTR then you would set a zone for LTR and within you would 
set those parameters for that particular system.

Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "Ralph S. Turk" 

Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:32:52 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250


I can not find where I set the zone/channels. 
- Original Message - 
From: wa...@earthlink.net 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 8:36:37 AM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona) 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250 








You have to set your zone first to establish how many channels are in the zone 
then you can program frrqs for each zone. 


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 


From : "Ralph S. Turk" 
Date : Sat, 30 May 2009 15:11:05 + (UTC) 
To :  
Subject : [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250 






Good morning All 

I have several CDM 1250's that need programing. 

I received every thing with the CDM's. 
Service manuals 
Programing Software 
Programing cable 
Rib etc 

The only thing I did not receive was the instructions for using the 
software. 

Software fires up fine and I have been able to program 1 channel into a 
64 channel radio. I have tried to add other channels to no avail. 
The information shows up in the tree display and when I tell it to write to the 
radio, software indicates that it has loaded the channels but the CDM display 
only shows the first channel. 

What am I doing wrong? 

Ralph, W7HSG 








Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250

2009-05-30 Thread wa2ar
Yes but if the code plug versions are different it may not work. You may have 
to read and rewrite if that is the case. The clone icon if I remember is on the 
top pf the software window. These are not simple to program.
There is no software manual except F1 key. Mot. Assumes this is used by an 
experienced dealer.

Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "Ralph S. Turk" 

Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:46:46 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250


Is there a method to clone from one radio to the other? 

- Original Message - 
From: wa...@earthlink.net 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 8:36:37 AM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona) 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250 








You have to set your zone first to establish how many channels are in the zone 
then you can program frrqs for each zone. 


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 


From : "Ralph S. Turk" 
Date : Sat, 30 May 2009 15:11:05 + (UTC) 
To :  
Subject : [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250 






Good morning All 

I have several CDM 1250's that need programing. 

I received every thing with the CDM's. 
Service manuals 
Programing Software 
Programing cable 
Rib etc 

The only thing I did not receive was the instructions for using the 
software. 

Software fires up fine and I have been able to program 1 channel into a 
64 channel radio. I have tried to add other channels to no avail. 
The information shows up in the tree display and when I tell it to write to the 
radio, software indicates that it has loaded the channels but the CDM display 
only shows the first channel. 

What am I doing wrong? 

Ralph, W7HSG 








Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250

2009-05-30 Thread wa2ar
That software is not designed for end users. It really is dealer software so it 
is not very intuitive. Try f1 for help. 

Good luck,

Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "Ralph S. Turk" 

Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:11:05 
To: 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250


Good morning All 

I have several CDM 1250's that need programing. 

I received every thing with the CDM's. 
Service manuals 
Programing Software 
Programing cable 
Rib etc 

The only thing I did not receive was the instructions for using the 
software. 

Software fires up fine and I have been able to program 1 channel into a 
64 channel radio. I have tried to add other channels to no avail. 
The information shows up in the tree display and when I tell it to write to the 
radio, software indicates that it has loaded the channels but the CDM display 
only shows the first channel. 

What am I doing wrong? 

Ralph, W7HSG 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250

2009-05-30 Thread wa2ar
You have to set your zone first to establish how many channels are in the zone 
then you can program frrqs for each zone.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "Ralph S. Turk" 

Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:11:05 
To: 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola CDM 1250


Good morning All 

I have several CDM 1250's that need programing. 

I received every thing with the CDM's. 
Service manuals 
Programing Software 
Programing cable 
Rib etc 

The only thing I did not receive was the instructions for using the 
software. 

Software fires up fine and I have been able to program 1 channel into a 
64 channel radio. I have tried to add other channels to no avail. 
The information shows up in the tree display and when I tell it to write to the 
radio, software indicates that it has loaded the channels but the CDM display 
only shows the first channel. 

What am I doing wrong? 

Ralph, W7HSG 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: VXR-7000 Programming

2009-04-07 Thread wa2ar
Try writing a default file to the repeater. Test then program your data. Make 
sure it is the correct one for the band. If you by accident write a vhf file to 
a uhf model you will have a door stop and will have to go back to
Vertex.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "kfd29" 

Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:14:45 
To: 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: VXR-7000 Programming


:) Software and cable both reflect COM1...I think I remember having to tweak 
with the driver settings but not sure.  Could not find this anywhere in the 
service manual, any thoughts on what they should be?  Baud rate, flow, parity, 
etc.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Hudson"  wrote:
>
>  
> 
> Make sure you're on the right com port.
> 
> Attempting to program a VXR-7000 using CE-27 (using factory cables &
> software). No problems in the past. This time around, gives a read error
> "invalid data receive". Also, flashes "CL" and "ON" repeatedly, along with
> "CLN" on the ANI display...can't remember if this occured last time or not.
> Any advice? Thanks.
>