Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing
I've just upgraded my site to 1.7.1 and it didn't mention it: Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.14 to 1.7.1 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! -- Bruce Cran -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing
Hi Bruce, Thanks for confirming. That is quite strange. I'll work on a fix for this in the upcoming 1.7.2. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Bruce Cran bruce.c...@gmail.com wrote: I've just upgraded my site to 1.7.1 and it didn't mention it: Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.14 to 1.7.1 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! -- Bruce Cran -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
How to get diff draft info using web API?
Hi, I am uploading a diff using the web API and dhe diff content seems to be uploaded without issues. However, I couIdn't find a way to get the draft diff info: 1. How can I get to the uploaded (draft) diff info using the API? According to the documentation (http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/webapi/2.0/resources/diff-list/), The new diff will have a revision of 0. , but when I try to get the diff with revision 0, server returns 'object does not exist' error. 2. Server's response to the POST (that creates the new diff) contains the new diff info in JSON. How can I make it to return in XML? Accept header is set to application/xml on the request. Thanks, Bora -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: How to get diff draft info using web API?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Baybora Aksoy ber...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Server's response to the POST (that creates the new diff) contains the new diff info in JSON. How can I make it to return in XML? Accept header is set to application/xml on the request. Can you try passing api_format=xml along with your POST parameters ? -Raja -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
GIT confusion
I am so boggled by the GIT configuration for repositories. If someone could clarify the actual steps and config examples I am sure I can hack it out. Centos 6, Reviewboard 1.7 from easy_install ReviewBoard But here is the scenario. Master Repo is on a server with given name for instance, Hostname of git master repo: git.hq.net I have setup Gitweb and this resolves properly as: http://git.hq.net/Ops_Config.git Reviewboard is on another server: reviewboard.hq.net Clone command: git clone git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config Git remote show origin yields: Fetch URL: git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config Push URL: git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config Then i also cloned the repo locally, I saw someone say this had to be done on the Reviewboard server so... /var/www/reviewboard/git/Ops_config Ok now I want to understand how i derive the PATH MIRROR PATH MASK PATH I have tried many different combinations, can anyone suggest how this logic all fits together in the context of what ReviewBoard wants to see. Thanks in advance I am on Skype too, @ vast.active -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: How to get diff draft info using web API?
Hi, It didn't work. Here is the post data: --8cfbe28cefd0b93 Content-Disposition: form-data; name=basedir trunk/ --8cfbe28cefd0b93 Content-Disposition: form-data; name=api_format xml --8cfbe28cefd0b93 Content-Disposition: form-data; name=path; filename=testagain.diff Content-Type: text/plain Index: admin.html === --- admin.html (revision 2) +++ admin.html (working copy) @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ /div !--/.well -- div class=well - span class=label label-infoTip:/span Want to add + span class=label label-infoTip:/span Would you like to add additional Subversion features like Code Search, Code Review, Analytics or enhanced permissions management? br / br / a href=teamforge.htmlConnect/a Subversion Edge to --8cfbe28cefd0b93-- Thanks, Bora On Friday, January 11, 2013 1:10:59 PM UTC-6, Raja wrote: Can you try passing api_format=xml along with your POST parameters ? -Raja -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: GIT confusion
Hi, The best way to link Review Board with Git is to first make sure you have Gitweb, cgit, or some other web-based Git repository viewer set up for your repository. Review Board can use these to access the contents of files in the repository, if you provide it with the raw file URL mask. We have examples in our admin documentation on how to configure with gitweb, cgit, and others. The advantage this has over using a local clone is that you never have a problem with the clone being out of sync. Git is more tricky to configure than services like Subversion, because there's no way in the protocol to fetch one specific file's contents, given a path and revision. Hence the need for either a full clone (which is not the ideal way to go), or something like gitweb/cgit. Now, the Path should generally be what you'd use to clone the repository with. However, if you're using the local clone method for Git, Path will need to be the local filesystem path to that clone, and Mirror Path will be the typical clone path instead. So assuming the gitweb approach, you'd use your git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config. Once you've configured all this, you'll want to install RBTools on the developer machines and use post-review to post review requests. You'll also want to configure a .reviewboardrc file, and that should have: REVIEWBOARD_URL = 'http://reviewboard.yoursite.com/' REPOSITORY = 'repository name' Where repository name is the Name field for the repository. Then the paths don't matter for lookup purposes. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:56 PM, gamb...@gmail.com wrote: I am so boggled by the GIT configuration for repositories. If someone could clarify the actual steps and config examples I am sure I can hack it out. Centos 6, Reviewboard 1.7 from easy_install ReviewBoard But here is the scenario. Master Repo is on a server with given name for instance, Hostname of git master repo: git.hq.net I have setup Gitweb and this resolves properly as: http://git.hq.net/Ops_Config.git Reviewboard is on another server: reviewboard.hq.net Clone command: git clone git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config Git remote show origin yields: Fetch URL: git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config Push URL: git://git.hq.net/Ops_Config Then i also cloned the repo locally, I saw someone say this had to be done on the Reviewboard server so... /var/www/reviewboard/git/Ops_config Ok now I want to understand how i derive the PATH MIRROR PATH MASK PATH I have tried many different combinations, can anyone suggest how this logic all fits together in the context of what ReviewBoard wants to see. Thanks in advance I am on Skype too, @ vast.active -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Post-review asks for password even with active cookie.
Hi Steve, What version of RBTools is this? Would you mind running with --debug and posting a log entry for me to see? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:46 PM, sholsapp shols...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed that post-review will prompt me for a password even if I have an active cookie. As a result, when prompted for a password, I can enter gibberish and still successfully post a review. I don't see any options in post-review that allow me to say [use|don't use] cookie if available. Is this a bug? -Steve -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2858 in reviewboard: Broken link to search docs when Pylucene isn't installed
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2858 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: Broken link to search docs when Pylucene isn't installed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2858 What version are you running? 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://reviews/admin/settings/general/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Don't have pylucene installed on the server. 2. Visit the General admin page. 3. Click on the link under Enable Search. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? It should open a page explaining how to install pylucene and enable search. The page doesn't exist. What operating system are you using? What browser? Firefox on Windows Server 2012. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
