error with a patch (patch xxx failed to apply cleanly)
here is the patch in question attached, the issue showed on ubuntu 12.04.5 Reviewboard 2.5.4 then 2.5.15 python 2.7.3 here is the complete log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py", line 300, in get response = renderer.render_to_response(request) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py", line 56, in render_to_response return HttpResponse(self.render_to_string(request)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py", line 74, in render_to_string large_data=True) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.9.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py", line 298, in cache_memoize compress_large_data)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.9.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py", line 252, in cache_memoize_iter items = items_or_callable() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.9.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py", line 295, in lambda: [lookup_callable()], File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py", line 73, in lambda: self.render_to_string_uncached(request), File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py", line 87, in render_to_string_uncached request=request) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 669, in populate_diff_chunks chunks = list(generator.get_chunks()) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py", line 786, in get_chunks for chunk in super(DiffChunkGenerator, self).get_chunks(cache_key): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py", line 107, in get_chunks large_data=True) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.9.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py", line 298, in cache_memoize compress_large_data)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.9.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py", line 252, in cache_memoize_iter items = items_or_callable() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.9.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py", line 295, in lambda: [lookup_callable()], File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py", line 106, in lambda: list(self.get_chunks_uncached()), File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py", line 793, in get_chunks_uncached new = get_patched_file(old, self.filediff, self.request) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 233, in get_patched_file return patch(diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file, request) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.15-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 169, in patch 'output': stderr, Exception: The patch to 'jhoang/Rel_22.0.1123_Bundle3_v4/WebApps/CommPilot/ServiceProvider/DefaultConfig/Nested/CustomTags/body.jsp' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.OMLo8e' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: As mentionned it happend on both 2.5.4 and 2.5.15 as the diff is really small I guess it might be some syntax that it does not like, I tried a couple times, changed some blank space just in case, did not help. first time seeing this error in over 13k reviews -- http://www.broadsoftconnections.com This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. Ce message confidentiel et les éventuelles pièces jointes sont à l’usage exclusif de son ou de sa destinataire. Il est interdit, pour toute autre personne, de le distribuer, d’en dévoiler le contenu ou de le reproduire. Si vous avez reçu cette communication par erreur, veuillez en informer immédiatement l’expéditeur par courrier électronique et détruire l’original de ce message ainsi que toute copie. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To
Re: Review Board 2.0.3, and the new Package Store!
thanks, looking great and the fix for the long string is welcome :) -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014 http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: scroll issue on some file
I indeed have a couple long html strings in that file, I will wrap and see if it happens again (long being a couple 300ish lines and one 500ish line) I'll update you if it happens on files with shorter lines, in the mean time I will assume that this is the source of the problem (and should be fixed in my file in fact) Thanks On Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:22:18 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Adrien, Somewhere in that file, I imagine you have a very long line that the browser is unable to wrap. We rely on the browser to handle wrapping, since we have very little control of that. Some browsers work differently than other browsers in this regard. If you have a line that the browser considers one long unwrappable string, then it's going to cause this sort of problem. Can you check to see if that's the case? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Adrien Rochereau aroch...@broadsoft.com javascript: wrote: this one is a weird bug, on 2.0.1 it does not detect properly when to wrap the lines and it makes it impossible to review a file, see screenshot. please note that this is one file out of more than 50, so definitely not a common bug but still annoying: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-ThIEqGdw0fM/U4eNQN3lVXI/AFo/JE0lZonGryo/s1600/scrolling+bug.png as you can see the right side is being cut, let me know if you need more information. scrolling down to other files, the other files were correct. See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014 http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Multiple Warnings and strange behaviour on RB2.0
getting the same logs using tortoisesvn as well On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:10:31 PM UTC-4, MoonWalker wrote: No, we are using tortoisesvn to generate an unified diffs. We are using SVN only On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:21:18 PM UTC+10, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Those are completely harmless and unrelated. Are you using any extensions? ReviewBot perhaps? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:19 PM, MoonWalker daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: I renable Debug mode, because we are experiencing some strange behavior on some reviews, when we try to update some reviews. Seems like when the developers submit publish the nothing happens and the new review does not get published. I have the following warring and this may or may not explain such behavior or any other potential issue. 23:00:49WARNING - Cache data for key codereview.local:/:diffviewer/diff_file_fragment.html-3-1-3809-collapsed-highlighting-en-1401231630 (length 1706544) may be too big for the cache. 01:45:59WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning: DateTimeField User.last_login received a naive datetime (2014-05-21 00:00:00) while time zone support is active. RuntimeWarning) 1:46:00WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/http/response.py:327: DeprecationWarning: Using mimetype keyword argument is deprecated, use content_type instead super(HttpResponse, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) Is there any way to increase the level of verbosity, so far the only change that I made is enable DEBUG = True on settings_local.py -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Multiple Warnings and strange behaviour on RB2.0
publishing actually works fine, so not related as you said. These are actual warnings not errors anyway On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Nothing in those logs are related, so I don't actually have anything to go on. Those are just harmless warnings that everybody will see. While TortoiseSVN should be compatible, it's not actively tested. Still, it should *never* cause an issue with publishing. Adrien, are you also unable to publish? What does the browser's JavaScript console and HTTP response in the Network tab for the publish request show? Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Adrien Rochereau arocher...@broadsoft.com wrote: getting the same logs using tortoisesvn as well On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:10:31 PM UTC-4, MoonWalker wrote: No, we are using tortoisesvn to generate an unified diffs. We are using SVN only On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:21:18 PM UTC+10, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Those are completely harmless and unrelated. Are you using any extensions? ReviewBot perhaps? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:19 PM, MoonWalker daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: I renable Debug mode, because we are experiencing some strange behavior on some reviews, when we try to update some reviews. Seems like when the developers submit publish the nothing happens and the new review does not get published. I have the following warring and this may or may not explain such behavior or any other potential issue. 23:00:49WARNING - Cache data for key codereview.local:/:diffviewer/diff_file_fragment.html-3-1-3809-collapsed-highlighting-en-1401231630 (length 1706544) may be too big for the cache. 01:45:59WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning: DateTimeField User.last_login received a naive datetime (2014-05-21 00:00:00) while time zone support is active. RuntimeWarning) 1:46:00WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/http/response.py:327: DeprecationWarning: Using mimetype keyword argument is deprecated, use content_type instead super(HttpResponse, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) Is there any way to increase the level of verbosity, so far the only change that I made is enable DEBUG = True on settings_local.py -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014 http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/M_xRSmgWRQo/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
Re: css issue with text fields (review/test) in google chrome (fine in firefox)
Hi Christian, this seems to happen with some reviews and not with the new one, running most current chrome with no extensions, I also tried clearing the cache I suspect something regarding the length of the longest string? it also happens in a private browsing window On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:27:05 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Adrien, Very, very strange. I run Chrome primarily and haven't hit this at all, and we've had this new text area format for some time now. Just as a sanity check, can you try clearing cache? Also, are there any customizations (extensions, custom CSS, patches of any sort) to your build? Can you also verify what build of Chrome you're running? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Adrien Rochereau aroch...@broadsoft.comjavascript: wrote: somehow the text fields are overlapping the information fields on the right side of the window, like shown in the attachent this is using the latest version of chrome, RB 2.0.1 on ubuntu 12.0.4 with all the latest updates as I said it looks perfectly fine on firefox. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-zJhVilKuZ-c/U4Xsp1rHQwI/AFU/LW60yVudEzc/s1600/RB2.0.1+overlap.png other than that I did not see any CSS issues elsewhere or any rendering that would be different between both navigators See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
scroll issue on some file
this one is a weird bug, on 2.0.1 it does not detect properly when to wrap the lines and it makes it impossible to review a file, see screenshot. please note that this is one file out of more than 50, so definitely not a common bug but still annoying: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-ThIEqGdw0fM/U4eNQN3lVXI/AFo/JE0lZonGryo/s1600/scrolling+bug.png as you can see the right side is being cut, let me know if you need more information. scrolling down to other files, the other files were correct. -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: css issue with text fields (review/test) in google chrome (fine in firefox)
I will check for both and report on the longest strings, but it sounds like a good start indeed, I should be able to reduce it, thanks! On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: If you have a very long unwrappable string, just like the other e-mail I replied to, you may hit this problem. I can see about ways to limit this, but we may be limited in what we can do here. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Adrien Rochereau arocher...@broadsoft.com wrote: Hi Christian, this seems to happen with some reviews and not with the new one, running most current chrome with no extensions, I also tried clearing the cache I suspect something regarding the length of the longest string? it also happens in a private browsing window On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:27:05 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Adrien, Very, very strange. I run Chrome primarily and haven't hit this at all, and we've had this new text area format for some time now. Just as a sanity check, can you try clearing cache? Also, are there any customizations (extensions, custom CSS, patches of any sort) to your build? Can you also verify what build of Chrome you're running? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Adrien Rochereau aroch...@broadsoft.com wrote: somehow the text fields are overlapping the information fields on the right side of the window, like shown in the attachent this is using the latest version of chrome, RB 2.0.1 on ubuntu 12.0.4 with all the latest updates as I said it looks perfectly fine on firefox. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-zJhVilKuZ-c/U4Xsp1rHQwI/AFU/LW60yVudEzc/s1600/RB2.0.1+overlap.png other than that I did not see any CSS issues elsewhere or any rendering that would be different between both navigators See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014 http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014 http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/rjRXgALCaDk/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
css issue with text fields (review/test) in google chrome (fine in firefox)
somehow the text fields are overlapping the information fields on the right side of the window, like shown in the attachent this is using the latest version of chrome, RB 2.0.1 on ubuntu 12.0.4 with all the latest updates as I said it looks perfectly fine on firefox. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-zJhVilKuZ-c/U4Xsp1rHQwI/AFU/LW60yVudEzc/s1600/RB2.0.1+overlap.png other than that I did not see any CSS issues elsewhere or any rendering that would be different between both navigators -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to configure the search properly
Same issue here, except I did not rebuild the index but I get the no results thing (side note, as with 1.7.21 the instant search still works just fine) On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 9:26:54 PM UTC-4, Christian Wuerdig wrote: Hi, We always had trouble with the search largely due to this bug: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2544 Now with 2.0 I tried the search again and it worked a little bit better - instead of coming up with an error 500 I always got No results So I figured maybe I need to rebuild the index which I did with sudo rb-site manage /var/www/codereview/ rebuild_index It warned me that it will delete all indices and then claimed Indexing 1 review request - hm, we have about 11,000+ review requests in the system so that is a bit weird Also the search is now broken - I'm getting a server error 500 again and the stack trace points to: IOError: The path to your Whoosh index '/var/www/codereview/index' is not writable for the current user/group. Typing something into the search box will yield perfectly good results after a little while in the drop down (as long as what I'm looking for is part of the Summary) just hitting enter on the search box won't work properly. So my questions are: 1. How do I properly configure the search - mainly which user should own the index? Apparently not root because that's what it is now and that's not working. 2. How can I track down the indexing problem (in the sense that it claims it can only index 1 request)? Cheers Christian -- See why you should attend BroadSoft Connections 2014http://broadsoftconnections.com/ This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or copying it. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: epel 5.4 missing reviewboard package
Thanks guys, well we moved to a recent ubuntu instead and installed it.. not our standard work environment though, but it was less trouble like that. On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:35:55 AM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 11/11/2013 07:21 AM, Dan Porter wrote: For those wanting to run RBTools under EL5 (which is unfortunately our main production environment still), attached is an unofficial package we use at our company. It's built from standard sources and contains a minor patch. No post 0.5.2 updates/patches have been applied. Link to Gist if you wish to build this yourself: https://gist.github.com/Stealthii/7412376 On reviewboard itself I can confirm there are issues running this on RHEL5. Strongly recommend 6.2+. On Monday, November 4, 2013 11:35:43 PM UTC, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 11/04/2013 01:28 PM, Adrien Rochereau wrote: Hi, I did an install two weeks ago on a centos 5.4 without any issues, This week, trying to do the same thing on RHEL 5.4 and yum kept returining not found, if you go to the package browser on fedora's website, you cannot find RB anymore under 5/i386. Is this because of an update or are you pulling the support of EPEL5? Yes, I sent out an announcement quite a while ago. RHEL/CentOS 4 is too old and cannot support ReviewBoard any longer without significant effort in porting all of its dependencies to the python26 toolchain in EPEL. Given that RHEL 5 is very old and in maintenance mode, I reasoned that people would generally accept running a RHEL 6 VM to power ReviewBoard if they wanted to. Oops! Thanks for pointing this out to me. I thought I had released an RBTools 0.5.2 package for EPEL 5, but it looks like I must have forgotten to. It's now built and on the way to the EPEL 5 updates-testing repository. I retired the Review Board server from EPEL 5, but it makes sense to maintain the client. I've created the package now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RBTools-0.5.2-1.el5 It should get into the epel-testing repo within 48 hours. You can also download the RPM directly from the link above. Dan: I don't understand the point of the patch in your gist. It looks like a variant of an old one I had created, but it's no longer necessary. I got a better version upstreamed so that it will try to use the system copy before it resorts to ez_setup. Your patch doesn't really hurt anything, but it's unnecessary. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
epel 5.4 missing reviewboard package
Hi, I did an install two weeks ago on a centos 5.4 without any issues, This week, trying to do the same thing on RHEL 5.4 and yum kept returining not found, if you go to the package browser on fedora's website, you cannot find RB anymore under 5/i386. Is this because of an update or are you pulling the support of EPEL5? Thanks -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
