Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
Can't agree more with Alex. Lets switch over on a New Year: 2009/12/31 Daniel Reimer daniel.rei...@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de Sure it is. But explain this to the lazy bums out there :-P Nah, honestly, I dont think theres a real reason except the big step having to update gcc. Alex Ionescu schrieb: Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing. ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
I fully support moving forward too. If some lazy ppl don't want to use a newer RosBE, it's their own problem. On Dec 31, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote: Can't agree more with Alex. Lets switch over on a New Year: 2009/12/31 Daniel Reimer daniel.rei...@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de Sure it is. But explain this to the lazy bums out there :-P Nah, honestly, I dont think theres a real reason except the big step having to update gcc. Alex Ionescu schrieb: Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing. ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
Timo Kreuzer wrote: Would be great if we could upgrade to 2.20.51.20091118 or newer I've prepared a 20091222 package for RosBE-Unix 1.5. The source package usable for RosBE-Builder.sh and buildtoolchain.sh has just been uploaded to http://svn.reactos.org/RosBE-Sources/rosbe_1.5. Daniel, if you're interested, try to use the buildtoolchain script under MSYS to make a new Binutils build for RosBE-Windows using this source package. Best regards, Colin ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
Colin Finck wrote: Daniel, if you're interested, try to use the buildtoolchain script under MSYS to make a new Binutils build for RosBE-Windows using this source package. And don't forget that I've also updated the MPFR library required for building to the final version 2.4.2. The new source package is available at the same location. See also my recent changes to the buildtoolchain.sh script. Best regards, Colin ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X build. Alex Ionescu schrieb: Hi, As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard hosts. As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that builds trunk just fine. So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)? Best regards, Alex Ionescu ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing. On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote: Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X build. Alex Ionescu schrieb: Hi, As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard hosts. As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that builds trunk just fine. So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)? Best regards, Alex Ionescu ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev Best regards, Alex Ionescu ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?
Sure it is. But explain this to the lazy bums out there :-P Nah, honestly, I dont think theres a real reason except the big step having to update gcc. Alex Ionescu schrieb: Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing. On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote: Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X build. Alex Ionescu schrieb: Hi, As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard hosts. As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that builds trunk just fine. So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)? Best regards, Alex Ionescu ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev Best regards, Alex Ionescu ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
