Re: Introduction

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi,


I don't see any FAS request, see 
https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Get_an_RPM_Fusion_Account


On 26/05/2024 12:36, robert.mader--- via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi!

My name is Robert Mader and I've been contributing to various FLOSS projects 
over the last years, notably Gnome Mutter and Firefox. For about the same time 
I've been a Fedora and rpmfusion user and am deeply grateful for this project 
and your work.

The main reason I'm introducing myself here is that I'd like to land 
https://github.com/rpmfusion/libva-intel-driver/pull/3 for my beloved Thinkpad 
T400 - and was asked to help with maintaining that package in 
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6894 - which, given its low 
development activity, is something I can do I think :)

Thus I'd like to apply for a maintainer role for libva-intel-driver.

Best regards!

Relevant accounts:
  - https://gitlab.gnome.org/rmader
  - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rmader
  - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=588045
  - https://floss.social/@rmader
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction

[Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers]

Le mer. 13 mars 2024, 01:33, None via rpmfusion-developers <
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> a écrit :

> Hello everyone! My name is Jonathon Hyde. I have been using RPM Fusion for
> a long time, but this is my first time contributing. I have my first review
> request here: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6891. I
> don't have a ton of experience packaging or compiling software so any and
> all feedback is welcome. I am grateful for the contributions of everyone
> here as it has greatly uplifted my experience using Fedora, I hope to
> contribute as much as I can back. I'm also in need of a sponsor
>


Hello and welcome on board

This is specially appreciated to see people to focus on extending
fedora+rpmfusion packages coverage, as the keeping the effort remains
needed.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction + looking for a sponsor

[Gombos Gergely]

Thanks!

I have updated the package (plus now I'm a Fedora packager):
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5155#c3

Best regards,
Greg

Gergely Gombos  ezt írta (időpont: 2019. jan. 30., Sze,
9:21):

> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for the quick response!
>
> First I'm going to submit 'libldac' to Fedora since the Bluetooth
> package wouldn't build without it.
>
> So you're saying that I will have to rename the package to
> 'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld' or
> 'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-nonfree' depending on its dependencies?
>
> I'm going to ask upstream why fdk-aac is needed.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Greg
>
> 2019. 01. 30. 5:06 keltezéssel, Nicolas Chauvet írta:
> > Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 05:04, Gergely Gombos  a
> écrit :
> >> Hi RPMFusion devs,
> >>
> >> My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years
> and I'm a software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of
> open-source software in the Javascript world, I'd like to make my
> contribution, too.
> >>
> >> I'm looking for a sponsor, and my first RPM package is
> "pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-aptx" and its dependency "libldac".
> >>
> >> The original project - yet to be merged into upstream Pulseaudio -
> provides awesome audio quality for Bluetooth headsets via aptX, AAC and
> LDAC codecs. This is something that is hard to set up even on Windows! And
> this package works seamlessly on Linux.
> >>
> >> Originally this was in a COPR repo, with >100 downloads, but it got
> deleted due to legal reasons (ffmpeg build dependency). So I hope it will
> find a new home here since Fedora users are waiting for it.
> >>
> >> I've spent quite a lot of time figuring out how RPM packaging works and
> get this working and (hopefully) conforming to the guidelines - I
> appreciate your review and help.
> > Thx for your interest in the project and welcome.
> >
> > As stated by Leigh, there is a need to verify that libldac is patent
> > clear according to RedHat Legal or not, then we will introduce in RPM
> > Fusion free if needed.
> >
> > Another point is that we have a policy not to replace any
> > fedora/redhat package. So we you cannot rename the library so it can
> > install along, then the other way is to conflicts with the fedora
> > package. End-users will have to remove the fedora package and install
> > ours.
> >
> > Also you seems to provide a binary package using a source archive
> > which name is already in the fedora repo. We used to have a -freeworld
> > suffix to handle such case when the package is relevant to the free
> > section and -nonfree suffix when it's relevant to the nonfree section.
> > Please try to adapt as appropriate.
> > ___
> > rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction + looking for a sponsor

[Gergely Gombos]

Hi Nicolas,

Thanks for the quick response!

First I'm going to submit 'libldac' to Fedora since the Bluetooth 
package wouldn't build without it.


So you're saying that I will have to rename the package to 
'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld' or 
'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-nonfree' depending on its dependencies?


I'm going to ask upstream why fdk-aac is needed.

Best regards,

Greg

2019. 01. 30. 5:06 keltezéssel, Nicolas Chauvet írta:

Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 05:04, Gergely Gombos  a écrit :

Hi RPMFusion devs,

My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years and I'm a 
software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of open-source 
software in the Javascript world, I'd like to make my contribution, too.

I'm looking for a sponsor, and my first RPM package is "pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-aptx" 
and its dependency "libldac".

The original project - yet to be merged into upstream Pulseaudio - provides 
awesome audio quality for Bluetooth headsets via aptX, AAC and LDAC codecs. 
This is something that is hard to set up even on Windows! And this package 
works seamlessly on Linux.

Originally this was in a COPR repo, with >100 downloads, but it got deleted due 
to legal reasons (ffmpeg build dependency). So I hope it will find a new home here 
since Fedora users are waiting for it.

I've spent quite a lot of time figuring out how RPM packaging works and get 
this working and (hopefully) conforming to the guidelines - I appreciate your 
review and help.

Thx for your interest in the project and welcome.

As stated by Leigh, there is a need to verify that libldac is patent
clear according to RedHat Legal or not, then we will introduce in RPM
Fusion free if needed.

Another point is that we have a policy not to replace any
fedora/redhat package. So we you cannot rename the library so it can
install along, then the other way is to conflicts with the fedora
package. End-users will have to remove the fedora package and install
ours.

Also you seems to provide a binary package using a source archive
which name is already in the fedora repo. We used to have a -freeworld
suffix to handle such case when the package is relevant to the free
section and -nonfree suffix when it's relevant to the nonfree section.
Please try to adapt as appropriate.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction + looking for a sponsor

[Nicolas Chauvet]

Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 05:04, Gergely Gombos  a écrit :
>
> Hi RPMFusion devs,
>
> My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years and I'm 
> a software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of 
> open-source software in the Javascript world, I'd like to make my 
> contribution, too.
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor, and my first RPM package is 
> "pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-aptx" and its dependency "libldac".
>
> The original project - yet to be merged into upstream Pulseaudio - provides 
> awesome audio quality for Bluetooth headsets via aptX, AAC and LDAC codecs. 
> This is something that is hard to set up even on Windows! And this package 
> works seamlessly on Linux.
>
> Originally this was in a COPR repo, with >100 downloads, but it got deleted 
> due to legal reasons (ffmpeg build dependency). So I hope it will find a new 
> home here since Fedora users are waiting for it.
>
> I've spent quite a lot of time figuring out how RPM packaging works and get 
> this working and (hopefully) conforming to the guidelines - I appreciate your 
> review and help.

Thx for your interest in the project and welcome.

As stated by Leigh, there is a need to verify that libldac is patent
clear according to RedHat Legal or not, then we will introduce in RPM
Fusion free if needed.

Another point is that we have a policy not to replace any
fedora/redhat package. So we you cannot rename the library so it can
install along, then the other way is to conflicts with the fedora
package. End-users will have to remove the fedora package and install
ours.

Also you seems to provide a binary package using a source archive
which name is already in the fedora repo. We used to have a -freeworld
suffix to handle such case when the package is relevant to the free
section and -nonfree suffix when it's relevant to the nonfree section.
Please try to adapt as appropriate.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction and looking for a sponsorship

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On vendredi 19 janvier 2018 15:56:55 CET Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > I intend to contribute to RPMFusion the same way, I'm looking to package
> > qTox which depends on FFMPEG, and help reviewing other package (like the
> > Deepin packages which are waiting, and which I already reviewed Fedora
> > side). Thus I applied to the Packager group and I'm looking for someone
> > to sponsor me.
> The good news is any Fedora packager is automatically granted packager's
> status in RPM Fusion, so you can start submitting packages and doing
> reviews.
> 
> Welcome to RPM Fusion !
> 
> Regards,
> Xavier

Thanks!

However the FAS interface still showme as not approved:

RPM Fusion Packagers commits Group (user)
Status:
Unapproved 


Can you do something about this?


Best regards,

Robert-André

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction and looking for a sponsorship

[Xavier Bachelot]

Hi Robert-André,

Le 19/01/2018 à 15:48, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :

Hello,

I'm Robert-André, I have been using Fedora and RPMFusion for several years and
I've started contributing as a packager for Fedora in August of last year.
Since then, I have packaged near 50 apps or libraries [1] and reviewed over
1,000 packages [2].


Impressive :-)


I intend to contribute to RPMFusion the same way, I'm looking to package qTox
which depends on FFMPEG, and help reviewing other package (like the Deepin
packages which are waiting, and which I already reviewed Fedora side). Thus I
applied to the Packager group and I'm looking for someone to sponsor me.

The good news is any Fedora packager is automatically granted packager's 
status in RPM Fusion, so you can start submitting packages and doing 
reviews.


Welcome to RPM Fusion !

Regards,
Xavier
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction and a Question

[Sean Callaway]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Xavier Bachelot  wrote:
> Also, you shouldn't use Fedora's copr for stuff that wouldn't be allowed
> into Fedora, so I think your copr repository for discord breaks this rule.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Copr#Content

Eek! Good to know. I was using another Copr of the alpha version
(discord-canary), but you're very right! I'll be pulling that shortly
then.

> Hope this helps,
> Xavier

As far as the review, I was planning on doing that later today, just
wanted to get some clarification on the non-free side of things.

Thanks!
Sean
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction and a Question

[Xavier Bachelot]

Hi Sean,

On 31/01/2017 19:46, Sean Callaway wrote:
> Good morning,
> 
> My name is Sean Callaway and I'm a Linux SA in southern California. I
> currently am the maintainer of two packages for EPEL
> (openvpn-auth-ldap and re2c).
> 
> I am interested in seeing about getting Discord, a gaming chat client,
> into rpmfusion-nonfree. I have a working package in my Copr
> (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/seancallaway/discord/) and am
> getting ready to create my review request. I've read through the docs,
> but most of them are written for Fedora specifically and, as this is a
> binary release for nonfree, I'm not sure they apply fully. Either way,
> I'm left with at least the following question: what permission is
> required from Discord to have this included in RPMFusion? Is a
> developer's quick go-ahead
> (https://twitter.com/crmarsh/status/819615137531183105) enough?
> 
To get a package into RPM Fusion, it needs to be reviewed, like for
Fedora, although some of the rules in RPM Fusion are more relaxed.
You also need to be sponsored, but if you are already a sponsored
packager in Fedora, you automatically get the same status in RPM Fusion.

See https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors for details on the process.

Also, you shouldn't use Fedora's copr for stuff that wouldn't be allowed
into Fedora, so I think your copr repository for discord breaks this rule.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Copr#Content

Hope this helps,
Xavier
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: permission to update some packages Re: Introduction to the,list [NEEDSPONSORS] [Bug 3582] Review request: yle-dl

[Sérgio Basto]

On Seg, 2015-05-04 at 20:03 +0300, Jani Patanen wrote:
  From: Sergio Basto ser...@serjux.com
 
  Hi, I can't sponsor you (don't have permissions) and also we are in the
  middle of a migration, so maybe is not the best time to add packagers, I
  don't know. 
  But I can update the package , if kwizart agree, I will update this
  package yle-dl and stella, I was thinking also update Mixx but Mix was
  updated recently 
 
 Hi Sergio.
 I'm OK and delighted if you to update the package in repositories.
 
 I'll send you the .spec file as separate attachment (outside the mailing
 list). It's updated for the latest yle-dl (fresh. less than 1 week old).


22421 (yle-dl): Build on target fedora-21-rpmfusion_free succeeded.

Done ! 

Thanks, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

permission to update some packages Re: Introduction to the list [NEEDSPONSORS] [Bug 3582] Review request: yle-dl

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-04-30 at 05:29 +, Jani Patanen wrote:

 with the handy tool that is
 available for it: yle-dl. The package provided from rpmfusion was
 outdated and didn't work. Out of curiocity, I checked bit closer and it
 seems that I was not the only one who had run into this issue. There is
 actually a bug report that the version of yle-dl in the repo is out of
 date and does not work, yet the actual author has made many updates.


Hi, I can't sponsor you (don't have permissions) and also we are in the
middle of a migration, so maybe is not the best time to add packagers, I
don't know. 
But can update the package , if kwizart agree, I will update this
package yle-dl and stella, I was thinking also update Mixx but Mix was
updated recently 

Best regards 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: Introduction

[deogracia]

Hi and welcome Martyn !

- Mail original -
De: Martyn Hare mar...@warofthenerd.net
À: RPM Fusion developers discussion list 
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
Envoyé: Mardi 17 Juillet 2012 14:28:18
Objet: Introduction

Hi guys,

I am interested in contributing emulators, games and other amusements 
which can't be included in Fedora for legal/policy reasons.  I'm 
currently working on making the non-free pSX Sony Playstation emulator 
work on a modern system which uses PulseAudio [1].  It's considered the 
best emulator for the PS1 on Windows and works almost identically on 
GNU/Linux, but is difficult to get included in distributions (especially 
Fedora) for both legal and upstream abandonment reasons.

Since I've never packaged software for any project before, I'm guessing 
I need someone to sponsor me.  I'm completely new to contributing but 
I'm not new to using Fedora and would like to give something back to the 
community which has provided a decent product (for free, even!) for many 
years.  I'd also like to make the same packages I submit available for 
RHEL, as they're going to be mostly gaming-related, the usual 
ABI/versioning considerations are likely to be less of an issue.

Looking forward to working with you guys to bring more 
games/entertainment to Fedora!

Regards,

Martyn Hare

[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420

--
IRC Nick:  WarOfTheNerd
WIP Packages: http://repo.warofthenerd.net

Re: Introduction, and review request

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2012/6/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
 Hello all,

 I have just posted my first rpmfusion review request for vlcj (Java bindings
 for vlc), here:
     https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2384
 Note that (as pointed out in the bug) this package depends on a patch to a
 Fedora library, which will hopefully come soon.

 I am already a Fedora packager, and I maintain several Java packages for
 Fedora, so I understand the process fairly well.

Hello Mary Ellen,

Welcome to RPM Fusion.

Please create an account on fas.rpmfusion.org and request to be in the
cvsextras groups.

Thx for joining us.

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 02/16/2011 08:18 PM, Moody, Tristan wrote:

Greetings all--

My name is Tristan Moody, and I'm a Fedora user dating back to FC6.  I'm 
joining at the suggestion of Nicolas Chauvet to assist with the maintenance of 
ndiswrapper.



Welcome!

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2011/2/16 Moody, Tristan tmo...@ku.edu:
 Greetings all--

 My name is Tristan Moody, and I'm a Fedora user dating back to FC6.  I'm 
 joining at the suggestion of Nicolas Chauvet to assist with the maintenance 
 of ndiswrapper.

Awesome!

Your account have been sponsored, ACL have been adjusted.

If you have any question, you can ask here or on #rpmfusion on Freenode.

Thx for joining !


Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: Introduction and Review Requests for PhotoFilmStrip

[Mario Torre]

Il giorno mar, 11/01/2011 alle 18.50 +0100, Mario Torre ha scritto:

 Hello David,
 
 I asked for advice to the list, and this is the reply that I got:
 
 --
 
 Since the program is unable to perform its primary function without 
 mencoder I'm pretty sure the following guideline [1] applies:
 
 ...packages which are not functional or useful without code or
 packages 
 from third-party sources are not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora.

hello,

Is there any more feedback about this?

Thanks,
Mario
-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

Re: Introduction and Review Requests for PhotoFilmStrip

[Mario Torre]

Il giorno lun, 10/01/2011 alle 22.30 +1100, David Timms ha scritto:
 On 10/01/11 08:24, Mario Torre wrote:
  This is my first mail to the list, and also my first package review
  request ever, and so I would like to introduce myself.
 Welcome.
 
  I wanted to start the process directly within the Fedora umbrella, but I
  don't think this is possible since PhotoFilmStrip requires mencoder to
  do any useful job (although it doesn't need it to run, it needs it to
  create the movies).
 So it sounds like it can technically be in Fedora, from what you are
 saying. Does that mean it can actually startup and accept input without
 mencoder installed ?
 Can it do anything useful at all (eg output to an open format like ogg ?
 
 If so, maybe it would be reasonable to have the application itself in
 Fedora, and separately package PhotoFilmStrip-mencoder/bad in RPMFusion
 (which is designed to bring in the Requires: as needed for full
 functionality ?
 
 Asking on the Fedora packaging list should get a definite answer.
 packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Hello David,

I asked for advice to the list, and this is the reply that I got:

--

Since the program is unable to perform its primary function without 
mencoder I'm pretty sure the following guideline [1] applies:

...packages which are not functional or useful without code or
packages 
from third-party sources are not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora.

[1] 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not_useful_without_external_bits

--

Cheers,
Mario

-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

Re: Introduction and Review Requests for PhotoFilmStrip

[David Timms]

On 10/01/11 08:24, Mario Torre wrote:
 This is my first mail to the list, and also my first package review
 request ever, and so I would like to introduce myself.
Welcome.

 I wanted to start the process directly within the Fedora umbrella, but I
 don't think this is possible since PhotoFilmStrip requires mencoder to
 do any useful job (although it doesn't need it to run, it needs it to
 create the movies).
So it sounds like it can technically be in Fedora, from what you are
saying. Does that mean it can actually startup and accept input without
mencoder installed ?
Can it do anything useful at all (eg output to an open format like ogg ?

If so, maybe it would be reasonable to have the application itself in
Fedora, and separately package PhotoFilmStrip-mencoder/bad in RPMFusion
(which is designed to bring in the Requires: as needed for full
functionality ?

Asking on the Fedora packaging list should get a definite answer.
packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Introduction and Review Requests for PhotoFilmStrip

[Mario Torre]

2011/1/10 David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au:

Hello David,

 I wanted to start the process directly within the Fedora umbrella, but I
 don't think this is possible since PhotoFilmStrip requires mencoder to
 do any useful job (although it doesn't need it to run, it needs it to
 create the movies).
 So it sounds like it can technically be in Fedora, from what you are
 saying. Does that mean it can actually startup and accept input without
 mencoder installed ?
 Can it do anything useful at all (eg output to an open format like ogg ?

I tried without mencoder. I can edit the movie and save the project
(in a PhotoFiltStrip proprietary format), but then I cannot render it,
I get a python stack trace telling me that mencoder is missing as soon
as I hit on the green check box to render the movie.

When mencoder is intalled, the recognised file type are:

Mpeg*
Flash
AVI

 If so, maybe it would be reasonable to have the application itself in
 Fedora, and separately package PhotoFilmStrip-mencoder/bad in RPMFusion
 (which is designed to bring in the Requires: as needed for full
 functionality ?

 Asking on the Fedora packaging list should get a definite answer.
 packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Of course I can ask,  and maybe I can patch the application to not
require mencoder but to save in flash format as default (although I
have to check how it does the export), although I think this package
really needs mencoder to be usable, it doesn't sound to be useful at
all without that, the editing capabilities are quite limited, it can
rotate the single photos and do a couple of simple effects (like b/w
and sepia), for anything more complicated one should use better tools
in my opinion, otherwise the risk is to have a python program that can
just rotate photos in a batch (but can only save the result in a
proprietary format then!!).

Cheers,
Mario
-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01/13/2010 03:24 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Quoting Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl:


Hi,

On 01/07/2010 04:29 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi,

On 01/05/2010 02:34 AM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi everyone,

I just create an account to submit my first package to RPM Fusion.
I use
RPM Fusion everyday since it's beginning and I want to contribute to
this great project.



Welcome!


I use Fedora since Fedora Core 1 and I am currently involved in some
part of it.



Ok, but are you already a Fedora packager ? If not you will need to
find
someone who is willing to sponsor you (same process as in Fedora
really),
see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

Note that currently at rpmfusion we don't have a sponsor process as
such really. We could wing it, but if possible (so if there is
anything you
would like to package for Fedora) it would be preferred
if you would become a Fedora packager first (if you're not one
already).

Regards,

Hans


I am currently in the process of becoming one. I have submitted two
packages for inclusion in Fedora, both of which are currently under
review.



Great!

I think it would be best to focus on that for now then, once you're an
approved Fedora packager, you are eligible to become an rpmfusion one
for free :)


The packages that I submitted are part of an effort to include softwares
that ship with Linux Format :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LinuxFormatPackaging



Ah, yes, that is a good project / effort!

Regards,

Hans



Good news, my sponsorship request has been accepted in Fedora, so I am
now an
Approved packager for Fedora!



That is good news indeed, in that case you can follow:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors

To become an rpmfusion packager too.

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Jean-Francois Saucier]

Quoting Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl:


Hi,

On 01/07/2010 04:29 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi,

On 01/05/2010 02:34 AM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi everyone,

I just create an account to submit my first package to RPM Fusion. I use
RPM Fusion everyday since it's beginning and I want to contribute to
this great project.



Welcome!


I use Fedora since Fedora Core 1 and I am currently involved in some
part of it.



Ok, but are you already a Fedora packager ? If not you will need to find
someone who is willing to sponsor you (same process as in Fedora really),
see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

Note that currently at rpmfusion we don't have a sponsor process as
such really. We could wing it, but if possible (so if there is anything you
would like to package for Fedora) it would be preferred
if you would become a Fedora packager first (if you're not one already).

Regards,

Hans


I am currently in the process of becoming one. I have submitted two
packages for inclusion in Fedora, both of which are currently under
review.



Great!

I think it would be best to focus on that for now then, once you're an
approved Fedora packager, you are eligible to become an rpmfusion one
for free :)


The packages that I submitted are part of an effort to include softwares
that ship with Linux Format :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LinuxFormatPackaging



Ah, yes, that is a good project / effort!

Regards,

Hans



Good news, my sponsorship request has been accepted in Fedora, so I am now an
Approved packager for Fedora!


Regards,

--
Jean-François Saucier
djf_jeff


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: Introduction

[Jean-Francois Saucier]

Hi,

On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On 01/05/2010 02:34 AM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
  Hi everyone,
 
  I just create an account to submit my first package to RPM Fusion. I use
  RPM Fusion everyday since it's beginning and I want to contribute to
  this great project.
 
 
 Welcome!
 
  I use Fedora since Fedora Core 1 and I am currently involved in some
  part of it.
 
 
 Ok, but are you already a Fedora packager ? If not you will need to find
 someone who is willing to sponsor you (same process as in Fedora really),
 see:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
 
 Note that currently at rpmfusion we don't have a sponsor process as
 such really. We could wing it, but if possible (so if there is anything you
 would like to package for Fedora) it would be preferred
 if you would become a Fedora packager first (if you're not one already).
 
 Regards,
 
 Hans

I am currently in the process of becoming one. I have submitted two
packages for inclusion in Fedora, both of which are currently under
review.

The packages that I submitted are part of an effort to include softwares
that ship with Linux Format :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LinuxFormatPackaging



Regards,

-- 
Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff)
GPG key : 0xA9E6E953


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Introduction

[Jochen Schmitt]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:25:14 +0100, you wrote:

Ok, but are you already a Fedora packager ? If not you will need to find
someone who is willing to sponsor you (same process as in Fedora really),
see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

Note that currently at rpmfusion we don't have a sponsor process as
such really. We could wing it, but if possible (so if there is anything you
would like to package for Fedora) it would be preferred
if you would become a Fedora packager first (if you're not one already).

For clarificatin:

If you seek a sponsor you have set Bug #30 as a blocker bug on
your review reqest.

If you want to get a rpmfusion sponsor, there is no formal
process on rpmfusion until now.  If you are a sponsor in the
Fedora project, you can get this state on your rpmfusion FAS
account, if you ask here for it.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.10.0 (Build 500)
Charset: us-ascii

wj8DBQFLRgziT2AHK6txfgwRAvdwAKCBSXraOTj74OYsfrqJtLbCSPFMLgCeLgKH
i5ai2QwiHXhjWoKtkM40G28=
=sf6Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01/07/2010 04:29 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi,

On 01/05/2010 02:34 AM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi everyone,

I just create an account to submit my first package to RPM Fusion. I use
RPM Fusion everyday since it's beginning and I want to contribute to
this great project.



Welcome!


I use Fedora since Fedora Core 1 and I am currently involved in some
part of it.



Ok, but are you already a Fedora packager ? If not you will need to find
someone who is willing to sponsor you (same process as in Fedora really),
see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

Note that currently at rpmfusion we don't have a sponsor process as
such really. We could wing it, but if possible (so if there is anything you
would like to package for Fedora) it would be preferred
if you would become a Fedora packager first (if you're not one already).

Regards,

Hans


I am currently in the process of becoming one. I have submitted two
packages for inclusion in Fedora, both of which are currently under
review.



Great!

I think it would be best to focus on that for now then, once you're an
approved Fedora packager, you are eligible to become an rpmfusion one
for free :)


The packages that I submitted are part of an effort to include softwares
that ship with Linux Format :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LinuxFormatPackaging



Ah, yes, that is a good project / effort!

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01/05/2010 02:34 AM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:

Hi everyone,

I just create an account to submit my first package to RPM Fusion. I use
RPM Fusion everyday since it's beginning and I want to contribute to
this great project.



Welcome!


I use Fedora since Fedora Core 1 and I am currently involved in some
part of it.



Ok, but are you already a Fedora packager ? If not you will need to find
someone who is willing to sponsor you (same process as in Fedora really),
see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

Note that currently at rpmfusion we don't have a sponsor process as
such really. We could wing it, but if possible (so if there is anything you
would like to package for Fedora) it would be preferred
if you would become a Fedora packager first (if you're not one already).

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

Happy new year all!

On 01/03/2010 08:53 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Arntzjsar...@yahoo.com  wrote:

Greetings!


Welcome!


My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to 
introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages that 
RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a programmer, but 
I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my first package 
submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on FCE Ultra. My 
first question, though, where would be a good place to host the .spec and .srpm 
files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of sites like rapidshare, 
megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure if those would be the best 
places to host the files. Once I am able to find a place to post them, I will 
take the plunge and file my submission for review.


I know these, but AFAIK they only use Italian language:

http://it.altervista.org/
http://xoom.virgilio.it/


Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based on GFCE 
Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two separate 
packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of 
fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and 
gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique 
packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.


I disagree with Hans. I would make two separate packages. I still
don't know why upstream put them in the same tarball. They are
different programs in every aspect: one is made in C and the other in
python, they have different build systems and so on. There is no
correlation between the two. I did ask upstream some time ago about
releasing different tarball: one for fceux and the other for gceux.
They told me they would have done so, but it seems they forgot. I
think it is time someone else nag them :)



Yes, that seems like valid reasoning to break the 1 tarbal 1 srpm rule.

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01/03/2010 11:59 PM, Xavier Lamien wrote:

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goedej.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl  wrote:

On 01/03/2010 07:40 AM, John Arntz wrote:


Greetings!

My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to
introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages
that RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a
programmer, but I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my
first package submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on
FCE Ultra. My first question, though, where would be a good place to host
the .spec and .srpm files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of
sites like rapidshare, megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure
if those would be the best places to host the files. Once I am able to find
a place to post them, I will take the plunge and file my submission for
review. Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based
on GFCE Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two
separate packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds
included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of
fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and
gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique
packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.



Hi John,

Welcome!

About hosting webspace for spec / srpms in review. Let me know when you have
a solution, I have the same problem :)

Xavier, Perhaps we can provide some space on rpmfusion infra for rpmfusion
contributors ?


Yeah, that's something we can work out.



Great, as with people.atrpms.net gone, I need a new place to has srpms / spec's
for rpmfusion packages under review (and fedorapeople is not the answer IMHO,
if Fedora does not want to distribute it, we should not be putting it on
fedorapeople.org either).

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01/04/2010 08:11 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goedej.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl  wrote:

About hosting webspace for spec / srpms in review. Let me know when you have
a solution, I have the same problem :)

Xavier, Perhaps we can provide some space on rpmfusion infra for rpmfusion
contributors ?



Sorry for being naive but... is there a reason why adding an
attachment to the review request is not a viable solution?



For packages which just have a specfile and a tarbal, and the
tarbal can be downloaded with spectool -g foo.spec, it is
a workaround. But officially, the reviewer should verify the tarbal
the submitter is planning to upload is identical to what upstream
is distributing, which requires access to the tarbal (and bugzilla
is not meant to attach large files).

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Arntz jsar...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Greetings!

Welcome!

 My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to 
 introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages 
 that RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a 
 programmer, but I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my 
 first package submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on 
 FCE Ultra. My first question, though, where would be a good place to host the 
 .spec and .srpm files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of sites 
 like rapidshare, megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure if those 
 would be the best places to host the files. Once I am able to find a place to 
 post them, I will take the plunge and file my submission for review.

I know these, but AFAIK they only use Italian language:

http://it.altervista.org/
http://xoom.virgilio.it/

 Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based on GFCE 
 Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two separate 
 packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of 
 fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and 
 gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique 
 packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.

I disagree with Hans. I would make two separate packages. I still
don't know why upstream put them in the same tarball. They are
different programs in every aspect: one is made in C and the other in
python, they have different build systems and so on. There is no
correlation between the two. I did ask upstream some time ago about
releasing different tarball: one for fceux and the other for gceux.
They told me they would have done so, but it seems they forgot. I
think it is time someone else nag them :)

I uploaded here the two wips SRPMs I did a long time ago. Feel free to
use what you need.

http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/wips/gfceux-2.1.0a-1.fc10.src.rpm
http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/wips/fceux-2.1.0a-1.fc10.src.rpm

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: Introduction

[John Arntz]

--- On Sun, 1/3/10, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:

 I know these, but AFAIK they only use Italian language:
 
 http://it.altervista.org/
 http://xoom.virgilio.it/

I might be able to find an English equivalent for that. Since I just need to 
host files, would any of those file sites I mentioned before do the job? I know 
some of them place limits on how many files/MB's you download within given 
period of time, so I don't want to make it difficult to fetch the files.
 
 I disagree with Hans. I would make two separate packages. I
 still
 don't know why upstream put them in the same tarball. They
 are
 different programs in every aspect: one is made in C and
 the other in
 python, they have different build systems and so on. There
 is no
 correlation between the two. I did ask upstream some time
 ago about
 releasing different tarball: one for fceux and the other
 for gceux.
 They told me they would have done so, but it seems they
 forgot. I
 think it is time someone else nag them :)

Based on my experience trying to package the two, I would have to agree with 
your logic in making them separate packages. From everything I have read, 
sub-packages are meant for when installed items from a single build need to be 
split up. These two however, have to be built separately and are independent of 
one another. Plus one is noarch and the other is arch specific. So when I do 
submit I will probably submit each separately.

I also agree that upstream needs to clean up their package a bit. I got it to 
build, but like FCE Ultra, you have to manually setup the file install as scons 
won't accept --prefix= unless upstream puts it in their scons buildfile. But 
once I get things going, I'll definitely go bang on upstream's door and let 
them know.

 I uploaded here the two wips SRPMs I did a long time ago.
 Feel free to
 use what you need.
 
 http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/wips/gfceux-2.1.0a-1.fc10.src.rpm
 http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/wips/fceux-2.1.0a-1.fc10.src.rpm

Thanks! I'll check them out and so I can see if my .spec files are done 
correctly. I tried to base the ones I have made off the FCE Utlra spec files, 
but I think some of the standards have changed since those look like they were 
part of dribble originally. Thanks again for the input!

Regards,
John


  

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl wrote:
 On 01/03/2010 07:40 AM, John Arntz wrote:

 Greetings!

 My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to
 introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages
 that RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a
 programmer, but I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my
 first package submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on
 FCE Ultra. My first question, though, where would be a good place to host
 the .spec and .srpm files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of
 sites like rapidshare, megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure
 if those would be the best places to host the files. Once I am able to find
 a place to post them, I will take the plunge and file my submission for
 review. Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based
 on GFCE Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two
 separate packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds
 included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of
 fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and
 gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique
 packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.


 Hi John,

 Welcome!

 About hosting webspace for spec / srpms in review. Let me know when you have
 a solution, I have the same problem :)

 Xavier, Perhaps we can provide some space on rpmfusion infra for rpmfusion
 contributors ?

Yeah, that's something we can work out.



 As for how to handle the bundled gtk front-end, the rule of thumb is 1 tar
 bal one srpm,
 so I would put it in a sub package,

 Regards,

 Hans




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Introduction

[Conrad Meyer]

On Sunday 03 January 2010 02:46:38 pm John Arntz wrote:
 --- On Sun, 1/3/10, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
  I know these, but AFAIK they only use Italian language:
 
  http://it.altervista.org/
  http://xoom.virgilio.it/
 
 I might be able to find an English equivalent for that. Since I just need
  to host files, would any of those file sites I mentioned before do the
  job? I know some of them place limits on how many files/MB's you download
  within given period of time, so I don't want to make it difficult to fetch
  the files.

How about Google Sites or something like that? The sites you mention have 
super obnoxious ads and 'wait times' and download limits that make them really 
annoying for others to use. I think you could also use fedorapeople.org if you 
already have a fedora account.

Best regards,
-- 
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu

Re: Introduction

[Gianluca Sforna]

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl wrote:
 About hosting webspace for spec / srpms in review. Let me know when you have
 a solution, I have the same problem :)

 Xavier, Perhaps we can provide some space on rpmfusion infra for rpmfusion
 contributors ?


Sorry for being naive but... is there a reason why adding an
attachment to the review request is not a viable solution?


-- 
Gianluca Sforna

http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna

Re: Introduction

[Hans de Goede]

On 01/03/2010 07:40 AM, John Arntz wrote:

Greetings!

My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to 
introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages that 
RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a programmer, but 
I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my first package 
submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on FCE Ultra. My 
first question, though, where would be a good place to host the .spec and .srpm 
files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of sites like rapidshare, 
megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure if those would be the best 
places to host the files. Once I am able to find a place to post them, I will 
take the plunge and file my submission for review. Also, the source contains 
gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based on GFCE Ultra. How should I handle 
packaging this? Should I make them two separate packages and submissions, since 
they are actually two builds included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of 
fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and 
gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique 
packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.



Hi John,

Welcome!

About hosting webspace for spec / srpms in review. Let me know when you have a 
solution, I have the same problem :)

Xavier, Perhaps we can provide some space on rpmfusion infra for rpmfusion 
contributors ?

As for how to handle the bundled gtk front-end, the rule of thumb is 1 tar bal 
one srpm,
so I would put it in a sub package,

Regards,

Hans

Re: Introduction

[Jack Neely]

Question about the kmod v2 stuff:

I have my own build system with some cracky makefiles and mock that I
store the packages I build in.

When I don't define 'kernels' mock quite happily builds the kmod
packages using the 

BuildRequires: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-newest

and things seem fine.

However, when I define 'kernels 2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE' mock
doesn't grok a BuildRequires to pull in the proper kernel-devel package
and the build fails.  I don't think mock is aware of the
kmod-openafs-kversion package yet.  I've tried making sure kmodtool is
installed in my mock root (with my buildsys-build package) rather than
pulled in as a buildreq.  But no joy.

What's the best way to teach mock about the kernel-devel  BuildRequires?

Jack
-- 
Jack Neely jjne...@ncsu.edu
Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services
Office of Information Technology, NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4  EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Jack Neelyjjne...@ncsu.edu wrote:
 Greetings,

 I'm Jack Neely and I'm the linux guy at NC State University.  (Where Red
 Hat's corperate HQ is located.)  I maintain our RHEL-based
 customizations, and other tools for managing a couple thousand Linux
 machines around campus.  I helped design the original kmod version 1
 standard and maintain a Yum plugin to do all sorts of evil with those
 kmods.  I'm hoping RPMFusion will make my job easier and have a few
 questions.

 RPMFusion maintains all the kernel modules I'm interested in supporting
 (and more) in RHEL 6 and our Fedora deployments (which really don't
 exist yet).  I would contribute OpenAFS to complete the set.

Hey, welcome Jack


 I assume folks are interested in having OpneAFS, the nVidia drivers,
 Open VM Tools, and other stuff maintained for EL6?

Actually people would. however, some stuff need to be done to get
things work from RPM Fusion

  What will be the
 relationship with EPEL in for EL6-land?

You'll sure have better comment about it at epel@ list.


 What about EL5?  Is there interest in using the older kmod v1 standard
 to add kernel modules there?

 Are the kmod builds automated or must jobs be submitted to rebuild those
 for each kernel?  I plan on extending my yum module to know what to do
 in this case for kmodv2 as well.

Build request for each kernel release.
For EL5, i would stay on kmodv1 and move on to kmodv[1-2] for EL6.




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Introduction

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 27.11.2008 13:27, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 25.11.2008 12:57, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I did struggle to find a comprehensive list of what's available 
though - is there a repoview somewhere?  If there is, I think it 
would be worth adding a link to it

from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.

Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002611.html 
There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area 
where we really suck.
OK, I'll try to fix things where I see them; I trust there are no ACL 
restrictions like (parts of) the Fedora wiki?

No, the Wiki is open to all users that created an account.
I created a PackageList page with links to the repoview index pages for 
each repo.


Thx for that. Seems David Timms gave it a try as well. I merged the two 
variants, (hopefully) improved things and put them on the RPM Fusion 
front side (which is I modified in some other areas as well -- but there 
is still more work needed afaics..). Check out


http://rpmfusion.org/

And tell me if you like it.


Some things I noticed:
1. Repoview for F10 says it's Development rather than Fedora 10


Hmmm. I simply copied development over to F10 without generating the 
repoview data again. Will look into that.


2. The updates repos for Fedora 10 and EL5 are empty and don't have 
repoview indexes. Does repoview not behave sanely in empty repos?


Looks like it -- it doesn't do anything for empty repos.

3. The main release repos for Fedora 8, Fedora 9, and EL5 are empty, 
with all of the content being in the updates repos. Is this ever likely 
to change?


For F8 and F9: no. For EL5: not sure yet.


(and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).

Will do.

Still seem to be blocked:


Xavier was helpful here afaics (and he is the better one to talk to for 
things like that). Hope you two get it sorted out.


Cu
knurd

Re: Introduction

[Paul Howarth]

Xavier Lamien wrote:

(and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).

Will do.

Still seem to be blocked:



removed.


Thanks. I'm now unblocked but my key's not working.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ export 
CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ export CVS_RSH=ssh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs co common
Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages 
if any)


My ssh key in RPM Fusion FAS is the same as my ssh key in Fedora FAS, 
which works OK.


Paul.

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Xavier Lamien wrote:

 (and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).

 Will do.

 Still seem to be blocked:


 removed.

 Thanks. I'm now unblocked but my key's not working.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ export
 CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ export CVS_RSH=ssh
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs co common
 Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
 cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
 any)

 My ssh key in RPM Fusion FAS is the same as my ssh key in Fedora FAS, which
 works OK.

Make sure your known_hosts file is cleaned up from rpmfusion hosts id and retry.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB

Re: Introduction

[Paul Howarth]

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 25.11.2008 12:57, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was 
clobbered by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were 
very similar. I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key 
that I uploaded to the rpmfusion account system last week.
Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for 
CVS yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC 
don't maintain any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan 
to help out anywhere? Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.
I'm happy to help out co-maintaining things (e.g. for EL) as there 
isn't actually anything that I'm particularly interested in that's 
not already in rpmfusion. I was going to submit an xv package 
originally but I think from the wiki that there's already one there.
Yeah. Do you want to take care of that for the EL branch? Then I'll 
branch it.

Yes, I'm happy to do that.


One thing before I add your name to owners.epel.list: Can you please 
mail the XV owner (see

http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=nonfreeview=markup
) what his plans regarding support for EL are? Maybe he wants to take 
care of it himself.


OK, will do.

I did struggle to find a comprehensive list of what's available 
though - is there a repoview somewhere?  If there is, I think it 
would be worth adding a link to it

from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.

Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002611.html 
There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area 
where we really suck.
OK, I'll try to fix things where I see them; I trust there are no ACL 
restrictions like (parts of) the Fedora wiki?


No, the Wiki is open to all users that created an account.


I created a PackageList page with links to the repoview index pages for 
each repo. Some things I noticed:


1. Repoview for F10 says it's Development rather than Fedora 10
2. The updates repos for Fedora 10 and EL5 are empty and don't have 
repoview indexes. Does repoview not behave sanely in empty repos?
3. The main release repos for Fedora 8, Fedora 9, and EL5 are empty, 
with all of the content being in the updates repos. Is this ever likely 
to change?


As I'm a sponsor in Fedora I thought I may not need separately 
sponsoring for rpmfusion (the wiki isn't clear on this I think), 
which is evidently not the case.
Yes and no. Yes, someone has to click the sponsor button in FAS 
(/me normally). But that's about it if you are already a sponsor or a 
normal contributor in Fedora.
OK, please click 


Done.


Thanks.


(and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).


Will do.


Still seem to be blocked:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ echo $CVS_RSH $CVSROOT
ssh :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs co xv
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages 
if any)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ date --utc
Thu Nov 27 12:27:04 UTC 2008

Can you drop me a line when this should be working as I don't want to 
keep retrying - that's what got me blocked in the first place.


Cheers, Paul.

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 25.11.2008 12:57, Paul Howarth wrote:

 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:

 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

 Orion Poplawski wrote:

 On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:

 After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was
 clobbered by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were very
 similar. I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key that I 
 uploaded
 to the rpmfusion account system last week.

 Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for CVS
 yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC don't maintain
 any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan to help out anywhere?
 Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.

 I'm happy to help out co-maintaining things (e.g. for EL) as there
 isn't actually anything that I'm particularly interested in that's not
 already in rpmfusion. I was going to submit an xv package originally but I
 think from the wiki that there's already one there.

 Yeah. Do you want to take care of that for the EL branch? Then I'll
 branch it.

 Yes, I'm happy to do that.

 One thing before I add your name to owners.epel.list: Can you please mail
 the XV owner (see

 http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=nonfreeview=markup
 ) what his plans regarding support for EL are? Maybe he wants to take care
 of it himself.

 OK, will do.

 I did struggle to find a comprehensive list of what's available though
 - is there a repoview somewhere?  If there is, I think it would be worth
 adding a link to it
 from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.

 Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in

 http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002611.html
 There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area where
 we really suck.

 OK, I'll try to fix things where I see them; I trust there are no ACL
 restrictions like (parts of) the Fedora wiki?

 No, the Wiki is open to all users that created an account.

 I created a PackageList page with links to the repoview index pages for each
 repo. Some things I noticed:

 1. Repoview for F10 says it's Development rather than Fedora 10
 2. The updates repos for Fedora 10 and EL5 are empty and don't have repoview
 indexes. Does repoview not behave sanely in empty repos?
 3. The main release repos for Fedora 8, Fedora 9, and EL5 are empty, with
 all of the content being in the updates repos. Is this ever likely to
 change?

 As I'm a sponsor in Fedora I thought I may not need separately
 sponsoring for rpmfusion (the wiki isn't clear on this I think), which is
 evidently not the case.

 Yes and no. Yes, someone has to click the sponsor button in FAS (/me
 normally). But that's about it if you are already a sponsor or a normal
 contributor in Fedora.

 OK, please click

 Done.

 Thanks.

 (and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).

 Will do.

 Still seem to be blocked:


removed.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Introduction

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 25.11.2008 12:57, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was 
clobbered by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were 
very similar. I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key 
that I uploaded to the rpmfusion account system last week.
Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for CVS 
yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC don't 
maintain any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan to help 
out anywhere? Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.
I'm happy to help out co-maintaining things (e.g. for EL) as there 
isn't actually anything that I'm particularly interested in that's not 
already in rpmfusion. I was going to submit an xv package originally 
but I think from the wiki that there's already one there.
Yeah. Do you want to take care of that for the EL branch? Then I'll 
branch it.

Yes, I'm happy to do that.


One thing before I add your name to owners.epel.list: Can you please 
mail the XV owner (see

http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=nonfreeview=markup
) what his plans regarding support for EL are? Maybe he wants to take 
care of it himself.


I did struggle to find a comprehensive list of what's available though 
- is there a repoview somewhere?  If there is, I think it would be 
worth adding a link to it

from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.

Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002611.html 
There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area 
where we really suck.
OK, I'll try to fix things where I see them; I trust there are no ACL 
restrictions like (parts of) the Fedora wiki?


No, the Wiki is open to all users that created an account.

As I'm a sponsor in Fedora I thought I may not need separately 
sponsoring for rpmfusion (the wiki isn't clear on this I think), which 
is evidently not the case.
Yes and no. Yes, someone has to click the sponsor button in FAS (/me 
normally). But that's about it if you are already a sponsor or a normal 
contributor in Fedora.
OK, please click 


Done.


(and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).


Will do.

CU
knurd

Re: Introduction

[Paul Howarth]

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:

I'm having trouble checking out unrar:

Try again please -- seems your account had not made it's way to the CVS
box. Sorry for the trouble.

still no go:
cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree co unrar
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above 
messages if

any)
Does the rpmfusion cvs server run denyhosts like the Fedora one does? 


/me checks

Yes, seems that the case. Orion, that acaics blocked you. Try again please.

BTW, just in case: anonymous checkout shoul work as well.

After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was 
clobbered by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were very 
similar. I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key that I 
uploaded to the rpmfusion account system last week.


Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for CVS 
yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC don't 
maintain any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan to help out 
anywhere? Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.


I'm happy to help out co-maintaining things (e.g. for EL) as there isn't 
actually anything that I'm particularly interested in that's not already 
in rpmfusion. I was going to submit an xv package originally but I think 
from the wiki that there's already one there. I did struggle to find a 
comprehensive list of what's available though - is there a repoview 
somewhere? If there is, I think it would be worth adding a link to it 
from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.


As I couldn't find one quickly, I thought of trying to check out modules 
from cvs. As I'm a sponsor in Fedora I thought I may not need separately 
sponsoring for rpmfusion (the wiki isn't clear on this I think), which 
is evidently not the case.


Paul.

Re: Introduction

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was 
clobbered by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were very 
similar. I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key that I 
uploaded to the rpmfusion account system last week.
Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for CVS 
yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC don't 
maintain any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan to help out 
anywhere? Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.
I'm happy to help out co-maintaining things (e.g. for EL) as there isn't 
actually anything that I'm particularly interested in that's not already 
in rpmfusion. I was going to submit an xv package originally but I think 
from the wiki that there's already one there.


Yeah. Do you want to take care of that for the EL branch? Then I'll 
branch it.


I did struggle to find a 
comprehensive list of what's available though - is there a repoview 
somewhere?  If there is, I think it would be worth adding a link to it

from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.


Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002611.html
There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area 
where we really suck.


And yeah, all of the repos contain a directory repoview/ that contains 
the repoview data.


As I couldn't find one quickly, I thought of trying to check out modules 
from cvs.


As mentioned: CVS works anonymously as well. But that's also not 
documented in our wiki :-/


As I'm a sponsor in Fedora I thought I may not need separately 
sponsoring for rpmfusion (the wiki isn't clear on this I think), which 
is evidently not the case.


Yes and no. Yes, someone has to click the sponsor button in FAS (/me 
normally). But that's about it if you are already a sponsor or a normal 
contributor in Fedora.


CU
knurd

Re: Introduction

[Orion Poplawski]

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
 On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
 I'm having trouble checking out unrar:

 Try again please -- seems your account had not made it's way to the CVS
 box. Sorry for the trouble.

 CU
 knurd


still no go:

cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree co unrar
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
any)

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com

Re: Introduction

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:

On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:

I'm having trouble checking out unrar:

Try again please -- seems your account had not made it's way to the CVS
box. Sorry for the trouble.

still no go:
cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree co unrar
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
any)
Does the rpmfusion cvs server run denyhosts like the Fedora one does? 


/me checks

Yes, seems that the case. Orion, that acaics blocked you. Try again please.

BTW, just in case: anonymous checkout shoul work as well.

After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was clobbered 
by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were very similar. 
I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key that I uploaded to 
the rpmfusion account system last week.


Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for CVS 
yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC don't 
maintain any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan to help out 
anywhere? Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.


CU
knurd

Re: Introduction

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 21.11.2008 22:45, Orion Poplawski wrote:

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Friday, 21 November 2008 at 17:46, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Hello.  I'm a long time Fedora contributor and sponsor, and long time 
livna user.  I'm interested in seeing more rpmfusion packages available 
on EL, and looking to help co-maintain those packages.

Welcome aboard.


A hearty Welcome from me as well!


Are there any specific packages you'd like to see on EL?

At the moment - transcode and unrar.


unrar is yours now. Note that it's built already, so everything should 
be fine.



 transcode is going to depend on a lot...


It's not that bad afaics:

* transcode needs libdvdread-devel as BR. We are waiting for that to 
show up in EPEL for some weeks now. Dominik, Rdieter, what the latest 
status? We really need to get this solved...


* transcode needs ImageMagick-devel as BR. That is not yet in EPEL. 
Orion, could you take care of that?


* transcode needs mjpegtools-devel; two problems:

** mjpegtools again requires SDL_gfx as BR, which is branched, but not 
built in EPEL. I filed a bug some minutes ago:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472678

** mjpegtools needs a owner for RPM Fusions EL branch. Orion, would you 
be willing to take care of that?


Further please note that David Juran (transcode maintainer in RPM 
Fusion) said he wanted to take care of all his packages for EL as well, 
as long as the dependencies are there:

http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-August/000792.html

Orion, so getting the dependencies into EPEL/RPM Fusion might be all you 
need to do ;-) But maybe you want to become co-maintainer for EL?


CU
knurd

Re: Introduction

[Orion Poplawski]

On Sun, November 23, 2008 4:44 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
 On 21.11.2008 22:45, Orion Poplawski wrote:
 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
 On Friday, 21 November 2008 at 17:46, Orion Poplawski wrote:
 Hello.  I'm a long time Fedora contributor and sponsor, and long time
 livna user.  I'm interested in seeing more rpmfusion packages
 available
 on EL, and looking to help co-maintain those packages.
 Welcome aboard.

 A hearty Welcome from me as well!

 Are there any specific packages you'd like to see on EL?
 At the moment - transcode and unrar.

 unrar is yours now. Note that it's built already, so everything should
 be fine.

I'm having trouble checking out unrar:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree
co unrar
Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
any)

Anything I'm doing wrong?  I've uploaded my ssh public key.

Running simple ssh with verbose, I see:

ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

trying to connect to cvs.rpmfusion.org

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com

Re: Introduction

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Friday, 21 November 2008 at 17:46, Orion Poplawski wrote:
 Hello.  I'm a long time Fedora contributor and sponsor, and long time 
 livna user.  I'm interested in seeing more rpmfusion packages available 
 on EL, and looking to help co-maintain those packages.

Welcome aboard. Are there any specific packages you'd like to see on EL?

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
Faith manages.
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:Confessions and Lamentations

Re: Introduction

[Orion Poplawski]

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Friday, 21 November 2008 at 17:46, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Hello.  I'm a long time Fedora contributor and sponsor, and long time 
livna user.  I'm interested in seeing more rpmfusion packages available 
on EL, and looking to help co-maintain those packages.


Welcome aboard. Are there any specific packages you'd like to see on EL?


At the moment - transcode and unrar.  transcode is going to depend on a 
lot...



--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com