Re: [rt-users] Rt from command line

2009-08-04 Thread Alexander Nikolaev
Therefor i suppose u work with unix-like os installed on your web-server.
Are you logged in as root (i mean logged in your server)?
First of all, don't work as root %)!

Users in RT have such a field - unix name (stored in database as gecos).

You are logged in as root and rt user root has unix login set to root - 
thats why you create tickets as root.

Create a new unix login, for example, akrall, go to web interface, set 
unix login of your account to akrall, then log in as akrall and try to 
create a ticket from command-line interface.

That works with rt-crontool, so, i suppose, will do for your case.
Sorry for poor english, hope its understandable :)

Anton Krall writes:
 Nobody?
 
 
 From: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:02:40 -0500
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: [rt-users] Rt from command line

 Guys.. Im trying to use rt form the command line to create tickets. So far I
 added the rtrc file and I can log into RT without problems... I can run
 commands, everything looks great... But now.. Im trying to run this:

 rt create -t ticket set subject='New ticket' priority=9 queue='Soporte
 Tecnico' requestors=s...@user.com

 But the problems is here: the ticket is created but as if user root created
 it, then HE gets the autoreply email and after that, RT says (in the history
 page of the ticket) that root was deleted from the ticket and it was changed
 to requester s...@user.com

 This is great except for one thing... The autoreply email was sent to user
 root and not s...@user.com since he got added AFTER autoreply was sent.

 Any way to create thet ticket as s...@user.com from the start?

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

-- 
Regards, Alex Nikolaev
Open Technologies, Russia.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Rt from command line

2009-08-04 Thread Anton Krall
Yep .. I tried that and works great but what if I wanted to be able to make
tickets from the command line as  multiple users, for example, client
users... Creating unix shells for them would be a good solution but I found
one Sendmail! Or more like it.. SendEmail, a command line tool that lets
you do a to and from  So that way I can inject an email like this:

SendEmail -t yourqu...@yourhost.com -f us...@domain.com
That way I can inject and email as if I were userX sending it... And RT
creates a ticket as if userX sent it from his email address.

Works like a charm!


 From: Alexander Nikolaev anikol...@ot.ru
 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:40:26 +0400
 To: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
 Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Rt from command line
 
 Therefor i suppose u work with unix-like os installed on your web-server.
 Are you logged in as root (i mean logged in your server)?
 First of all, don't work as root %)!
 
 Users in RT have such a field - unix name (stored in database as gecos).
 
 You are logged in as root and rt user root has unix login set to root -
 thats why you create tickets as root.
 
 Create a new unix login, for example, akrall, go to web interface, set
 unix login of your account to akrall, then log in as akrall and try to
 create a ticket from command-line interface.
 
 That works with rt-crontool, so, i suppose, will do for your case.
 Sorry for poor english, hope its understandable :)
 
 Anton Krall writes:
 Nobody?
 
 
 From: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:02:40 -0500
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: [rt-users] Rt from command line
 
 Guys.. Im trying to use rt form the command line to create tickets. So far I
 added the rtrc file and I can log into RT without problems... I can run
 commands, everything looks great... But now.. Im trying to run this:
 
 rt create -t ticket set subject='New ticket' priority=9 queue='Soporte
 Tecnico' requestors=s...@user.com
 
 But the problems is here: the ticket is created but as if user root created
 it, then HE gets the autoreply email and after that, RT says (in the history
 page of the ticket) that root was deleted from the ticket and it was changed
 to requester s...@user.com
 
 This is great except for one thing... The autoreply email was sent to user
 root and not s...@user.com since he got added AFTER autoreply was sent.
 
 Any way to create thet ticket as s...@user.com from the start?
 
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 
 -- 
 Regards, Alex Nikolaev
 Open Technologies, Russia.

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


[rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

2009-08-04 Thread Brian Gallew
So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using
an RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in
production (database/hostname differences).  I've run the
testdeps/fixdeps bits repeatedly and they claim I'm up to date.  I've
even used the CPAN r command to tell met what to update and then
update as much as I can, all to no avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:

Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 254.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 259.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.

/usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started

I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be
misleading as it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes
and therefore bears no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm
wondering if I've done something egregiously stupid.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] what are RTFM Topics used for?

2009-08-04 Thread Cassandra Phillips-Sears
Hello, Jo. Topics can be very useful for organizing your articles. On  
the RTFM Documentation Intro there is a section on using topics to  
organize and group your articles:


http://github.com/bestpractical/rtfm/blob/1d2d722dec013e3a1e55335a00c21b0ebeb8bed0/lib/RT/FM/Introduction.pod

I know that when I use RTFM I create articles with a topic or topics  
for easier categorization later on.


Though I personally have not used this feature, topics may also be  
used to create a Queue-Specific list of articles.


From the RTFM intro:

Queue Specific List of Articles

You can use Topics to organize a set of Queue specific Articles.
Simply create a global Topic called 'Queues' and then create Topics
under Queues named after each of your Queues.  Within each Queue named
Topic, create some Topics and then assign Articles to those
sub-topics.  This creates a hierarchy like this:

Queues
\- General
\- Topic 1
\- Topic 2

If you are replying to a Ticket in the General Queue you will be
offered a choice of Topic 1 and Topic 2 along with the searching.
After choosing Topic 1 or Topic 2, you will be given a list of
relevant articles to choose.

--
Cassandra Phillips-Sears

Office Manager
Best Practical Solutions, LLC
http://www.bestpractical.com

On Jul 30, 2009, at 2:23 PM 7/30/09, Jo Rhett wrote:

So I've read the RTFM manual and I'm no clearer really on what  
purpose Topics provide.   They don't see to add anything to the  
privileged user interface.   Is this something that is used in the  
self-service interface?


--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness


___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

[rt-users] Unowned tickets older then 24h are not displayed in Home page

2009-08-04 Thread Miroslav Horvath

Hello

We saw, that on home page in X newest unowned tickets there are displayed
only tickets which are not older than 24h ours.

If there are some new unowned tickets, which are older, they are not
displayed here. 

Is there some settings to set this ? So each unowned ticket will be
displayed there, not only tickets 24h. 

BR,
Miroslav
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Unowned-tickets-older-then-24h-are-not-displayed-in-Home-page-tp24808974p24808974.html
Sent from the Request Tracker - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8.4 and RTFM 2.4.2 No errors, but no RTFMlinks,have added Set(@Plugins,qw(RT::FM)); to RT_Siteconfig.pm

2009-08-04 Thread Scott Miller
I had this problem (RTFM disappeared). What fixed it for me was to
clean up all the different plugins I had and put them on one line in
RT_SiteConfig.pm, like this:

Set(@Plugins,qw(RT::FM RT::IR RTx::EmailCompletion));

Then you can verify if they are loaded ok by checking:

http://yourserver/rt/Admin/Tools/Configuration.html

Hope this helps,




Hi Kevin,

Nope, All dependences have been found.

Thanks,

Mike


From: Kevin Gagel
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 3:36 PM
To: RT Users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8.4 and RTFM 2.4.2 No errors, but no
RTFMlinks,have added Set(@Plugins,qw(RT::FM));  to RT_Siteconfig.pm


--- Original message ---
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.8.4 and RTFM 2.4.2 No errors, but no RTFM links,have 
added Set(@Plugins,qw(RT::FM));  to RT_Siteconfig.pm
From: Michael Ellis Michael_Ellis[at]UManitoba.CA
To: RT-USERS RT-Users[at]lists.bestpractical.com
Date: 06/07/2009 1:33 PM


Ok, I've been beating my head on this one. I had RTFM up and working on a test 
RT 3.8.2 server and then it just disappeared from the menu. I tried to figure 
out why, but after spending an afternoon trying to figure it out I decided 
that I wouldn't worry about it as I was going to be reinstalling from scratch 
for the production system anyway.

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

2009-08-04 Thread Nimbius
as a fedora team developer, the first thing ill insist is that you
upgrade to f10 or newer. nothing in f3 is supported in mailing lists
or the irc chans we host, and is sounds as though something OS
related is the culprit at this point.  perhaps youre missing http-devel?

On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Brian Gallew wrote:

 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:43:33 +0300
 From: Brian Gallew geek...@cmu.edu
 To: rt Users rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue
 
 So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using
 an RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in
 production (database/hostname differences).  I've run the
 testdeps/fixdeps bits repeatedly and they claim I'm up to date.  I've
 even used the CPAN r command to tell met what to update and then
 update as much as I can, all to no avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:

 Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
 line 21.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
 line 21.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
 line 254.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
 line 259.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
 Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.

 /usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started

 I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be
 misleading as it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes
 and therefore bears no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm
 wondering if I've done something egregiously stupid.
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


nimb...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

2009-08-04 Thread Joel Hartshorn
I had the same issue and found no help.  I did see the offer for paid
services, which seems to condradict the idea that you can at least install
the software.

I personally had to crack open each file and examine the failure.  I would
say 99% of the time it is going to be an upline dependency.  IE some perl
module/file on your system is not combatible with 3.8.4.

On RHEL 4.0 I never did get it to work with constant failure on HTML::Mason.

Good luck...and welcome to one of the big downsides of open source.


-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Brian Gallew
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:44 AM
To: rt Users
Subject: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using an
RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in
production (database/hostname differences).  I've run the testdeps/fixdeps
bits repeatedly and they claim I'm up to date.  I've even used the CPAN r
command to tell met what to update and then update as much as I can, all to
no avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:

Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 254.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 259.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.

/usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started

I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be misleading as
it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes and therefore
bears no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm wondering if I've
done something egregiously stupid.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

[rt-users] Question about email submission of tickets

2009-08-04 Thread Joe Kirby
This is my first time on the list and hopefully this question is  
appropriate for it.

I am a manager type who has been responsible for configuration and  
communication of RT to our campus. I have a talented Perl developer  
part-part time.

We have been live since 2-23-2009 and have had great success.

My question is email submission for ticket creation. We currently can  
create a ticket via email just fine and place it in the appropriate  
queue, etc. but we do not seem to be able to include a custom field  
value as part of the transmission from email to RT.

We have several system jobs which create tickets and it would be much  
better to have an additional piece of metadata on a ticket than to  
have to create several queues just so I can differentiate type of issues

Any help is greatly appreciated

Thanks in Advance

Joe Kirby, UMBC
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what

2009-08-04 Thread Michael Ellis
I've also found the O'Reilly book, RT::Essentials to be quite useful.

http://www.amazon.com/RT-Essentials-Jesse-Vincent/dp/0596006683/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1249394974sr=8-1

-Mike

--
From: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 8:36 AM
To: Jeremy Winder jwin...@logicalsi.com
Cc: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what

 Nice pointers.. Thx Jeremy.. I figured out a lot of these myself the hard
 way... But seems Im still missing a few things that I found on your url...
 Thx!


 From: Jeremy Winder jwin...@logicalsi.com
 Organization: Logical Solutions, Inc.
 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:31:19 -0400
 To: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
 Cc: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what

 On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:18 -0500, Anton Krall wrote:
 I just downloaded and installed RT and I got it working but I dont know 
 how
 to start configuring it.. Besides what the web interface has about users 
 and
 queues... It seems it needs to know more about email and for example, my
 domain.. The user web page still shows example.com  I read the wiki 
 and
 found some interesting articles but seems information is scattered.

 Is there a quick start guide that can help you configure RT to get you 
 up
 and running faster and a step by step guide on which files to change and
 configure?

 Thank You!

 You can skip a lot of this. But the section it should like you are
 missing in the RT_SiteConfig.pm:

 http://www.debianadmin.com/howto-setup-request-tracker-36-on-debian-etch.html

 Here is a series of articles that cover how to install and setup RT the
 hard way but still has some good information.

 http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/req_track_1.html

 Beyond that, google...lots of google.

 Hope this helps,

 Jeremy


 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

2009-08-04 Thread Lander, Scott
Your install path looks strange, to say the least...

For instance, seaching my (working) 8.4 system (OS is Ububtu 8.0.4) for 
Request.pm gives:

# find / -name Request.pm -print
/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Interface/Web/Request.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/DBI/Gofer/Request.pm
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8/HTML/Mason/Apache/Request.pm
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8/HTML/Mason/Request.pm
/usr/share/perl5/HTTP/Request.pm
#

I installed in the default location of /opt/rt3.


-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com 
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Joel Hartshorn
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:58 AM
To: geek...@cmu.edu; rt Users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

I had the same issue and found no help.  I did see the offer for paid
services, which seems to condradict the idea that you can at least install the 
software.

I personally had to crack open each file and examine the failure.  I would say 
99% of the time it is going to be an upline dependency.  IE some perl 
module/file on your system is not combatible with 3.8.4.

On RHEL 4.0 I never did get it to work with constant failure on HTML::Mason.

Good luck...and welcome to one of the big downsides of open source.


-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Brian Gallew
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:44 AM
To: rt Users
Subject: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using an 
RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in production 
(database/hostname differences).  I've run the testdeps/fixdeps bits repeatedly 
and they claim I'm up to date.  I've even used the CPAN r
command to tell met what to update and then update as much as I can, all to no 
avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:

Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 254.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 259.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.

/usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started

I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be misleading as 
it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes and therefore bears 
no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm wondering if I've done 
something egregiously stupid.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) 
named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or 
distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify the Hearst Service Center (cad...@hearstsc.com) immediately by 
email and delete the original message.


___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

2009-08-04 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:43:33PM +0300, Brian Gallew wrote:
 So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using
 an RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in
 production (database/hostname differences).  I've run the
 testdeps/fixdeps bits repeatedly and they claim I'm up to date.  I've
 even used the CPAN r command to tell met what to update and then
 update as much as I can, all to no avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:

When you configured, did you say --with-web-handler=modperl2
otherwise make testdeps can't test everything.
But, if I had to hazard a guess, I'd say your mod_perl install isn't
quite kosher

-kevin

 Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
 line 21.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
 line 21.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
 line 254.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
 line 259.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
 Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.
 
 /usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started
 
 I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be
 misleading as it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes
 and therefore bears no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm
 wondering if I've done something egregiously stupid.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

2009-08-04 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:57:58AM -0700, Joel Hartshorn wrote:
 I had the same issue and found no help.  I did see the offer for paid
 services, which seems to condradict the idea that you can at least install
 the software.
 
 I personally had to crack open each file and examine the failure.  I would
 say 99% of the time it is going to be an upline dependency.  IE some perl
 module/file on your system is not combatible with 3.8.4.
 
 On RHEL 4.0 I never did get it to work with constant failure on HTML::Mason.
 
 Good luck...and welcome to one of the big downsides of open source.
 

To be fair, any package of sufficient complexity will require care
and understanding to install whether it is a closed source commercial
package or open source. Hence the frequent requirement for OS xxx
VERSION yyy for closed source applications. It looks like you are
using a home built version of perl and it has some problems. This
is not really RT's fault. Try using the system software instead.
Compared to getting perl/Apache to work properly together, the RT
installation is very straightforward. Good luck.

Cheers,
Ken

 
 -Original Message-
 From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
 [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Brian Gallew
 Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:44 AM
 To: rt Users
 Subject: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue
 
 So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using an
 RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in
 production (database/hostname differences).  I've run the testdeps/fixdeps
 bits repeatedly and they claim I'm up to date.  I've even used the CPAN r
 command to tell met what to update and then update as much as I can, all to
 no avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:
 
 Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
 line 21.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
 line 21.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
 line 254.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
 /home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
 line 259.
 Compilation failed in require at
 /home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
 Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.
 
 /usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started
 
 I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be misleading as
 it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes and therefore
 bears no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm wondering if I've
 done something egregiously stupid.
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
 sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com



 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what

2009-08-04 Thread Anton Krall
Thx Mike, Ill take a look at it


 From: Michael Ellis michael_el...@umanitoba.ca
 Reply-To: Michael Ellis michael_el...@umanitoba.ca
 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:09:52 -0500
 To: RT-USERS RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what
 
 I've also found the O'Reilly book, RT::Essentials to be quite useful.
 
 http://www.amazon.com/RT-Essentials-Jesse-Vincent/dp/0596006683/ref=sr_1_1?ie=
 UTF8qid=1249394974sr=8-1
 
 -Mike
 
 --
 From: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
 Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 8:36 AM
 To: Jeremy Winder jwin...@logicalsi.com
 Cc: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what
 
 Nice pointers.. Thx Jeremy.. I figured out a lot of these myself the hard
 way... But seems Im still missing a few things that I found on your url...
 Thx!
 
 
 From: Jeremy Winder jwin...@logicalsi.com
 Organization: Logical Solutions, Inc.
 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:31:19 -0400
 To: Anton Krall akr...@intruder.com.mx
 Cc: RT-Users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Just finished installing now what
 
 On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:18 -0500, Anton Krall wrote:
 I just downloaded and installed RT and I got it working but I dont know
 how
 to start configuring it.. Besides what the web interface has about users
 and
 queues... It seems it needs to know more about email and for example, my
 domain.. The user web page still shows example.com  I read the wiki
 and
 found some interesting articles but seems information is scattered.
 
 Is there a quick start guide that can help you configure RT to get you
 up
 and running faster and a step by step guide on which files to change and
 configure?
 
 Thank You!
 
 You can skip a lot of this. But the section it should like you are
 missing in the RT_SiteConfig.pm:
 
 
http://www.debianadmin.com/howto-setup-request-tracker-36-on-debian-etch.htm
l
 
 Here is a series of articles that cover how to install and setup RT the
 hard way but still has some good information.
 
 http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/req_track_1.html
 
 Beyond that, google...lots of google.
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Jeremy
 
 
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 
 
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


[rt-users] Can Templates be Conditionalized Based on Recipient Address?

2009-08-04 Thread Duncan McEwan
Hi,

We're running rt 3.8.4.

We have one particular queue for which we conditionalize the email sent out
based on the creator of the transaction generating the email.  We do this by
checking $Transaction-CreatorObj-Name in the template.

We'd also like to further customize the email based on who the email is going
to.  More precisely, we want the copy of the email going to the requestor to
say something slightly different to the copy going to the queue watchers.

I've experimented with several approaches, but haven't managed to get this
working.

I thought if I could get the ScripAction name I could include a test against
Notify Owner, etc.  I tried getting that via
$Transaction-Scrips-First-ScripActionObj-Name, but the actions I got
back were not ones that were associated with this template.

I then tried getting the addresses associated with the current transaction
using $Transaction-Addresses, but that seemed to return empty lists
(though I could easily have been doing something wrong).

I could go into more detail regarding the above but in the interests of
keeping this email from getting any longer I won't.  I wasn't particularly
happy about either approach anyway, so before spending more time debugging
them, I thought I'd ask if anyone knew whether it was possible to
conditionalize templates in this way and if so, how.

While I've been writing this, it occurred to me that the easiest way to
achieve what I want might be to set up different templates for the different
scrips.  But because the templates are mostly identical I'd rather not have
that duplication if it is avoidable.

Thanks for any advice,

Duncan



___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Can Templates be Conditionalized Based on Recipient Address?

2009-08-04 Thread Jerrad Pierce
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/ForkTemplate

-- 
Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com