[rt-users] Cosmetic Bug in RT 4.0.4: Date and Time partially visible

2011-12-16 Thread Stefan Vollmar
Hi,

we have found a bug in RT (4.0.4) related to the Date and Time-picker 
used to create reminders. To reproduce this bug, select a ticket and 
then click into the Due text box in the Reminders widget of the 
ticket overview. Next, select a date. If your browser window is not wide 
enough, the time selection ui will be cut off at the windows edge. We 
found this behavior using both Chromium and Firefox on Linux (see 
screenshots). It is probably present in other browsers as well.

Warm regards,
 Stefan
-- 
Dr. Stefan Vollmar, Dipl.-Phys.
Head of IT group
Max-Planck-Institut für neurologische Forschung
Gleuelerstr. 50, 50931 Köln, Germany
Tel.: +49-221-4726-213  FAX +49-221-4726-298
Tel.: +49-221-478-5713  Mobile: 0160-93874279
Email: voll...@nf.mpg.de   http://www.nf.mpg.de


inline: rt-bug-chrome.pnginline: rt-bug-firefox.png

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

2011-12-16 Thread Thomas Lau
I could set due before Dec 10 2011, but I can't set display all ticket which 
due before Dec 10 2011, 2PM, how do you do such query?

From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com 
[rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Falcone 
[falc...@bestpractical.com]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 7:54 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:12:47AM +0800, Thomas Lau wrote:
 Yes, I understand the method, but not sure why due date can't define time, 
 any idea?

I'm not sure I understand the question.  The SLA Extension and Due
date absolutely set times.

-kevin

 - Original Message -
 From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com 
 rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Sent: Fri Dec 16 04:09:48 2011
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:49:45PM +0800, Thomas Lau wrote:
  Guys, I am trying to monitor SLA due date using external tools like nagios 
  or zabbix, but I haven't find a way to do that, we have SLA extension 
  running for couple months now.
  Anyone could give me some advice based on rt command line or mysql queue?

 Use the Query Builder to search for overdue tickets, once you're happy
 with the results, you can run that same search from bin/rt

 -kevin
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston  March 5  6, 2012

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


[rt-users] RT Newbie: Inbound email by getmail fails at unknown rtuser

2011-12-16 Thread RT User
All,

I'm installing RT 4.0.4 on Ubuntu 10.04 with AD integration. I can login to
RT web UI. I have run into a problem fetching emails using getmail.

Here is the problem,

snip
Delivery error (command rt-mailgate 19780 error (127, exec of command
rt-mailgate failed (no such specified user ('getpwnam(): name not found:
rtuser'
  msg  1/84 (1117 bytes) from zenoss@xxx, delivery error (command
rt-mailgate 19780 error (127, exec of command rt-mailgate failed (no such
specified user ('getpwnam(): name not found: rtuser'
/snip

Here is my /opt/rt4/etc/getmailrc

snip
[retriever]
type = SimplePOP3Retriever
server = xxx.com
port = 110
username = x
password = x

[destination]
type = MDA_external
path = /opt/rt4/bin/rt-mailgate
user = rtuser
#group = rtgroup
arguments = (--url, http://xx.com;, --queue, General,
--action, correspond,)

[options]
read_all = false
delete_after = 8
verbose = 2
/snip


Here is how im invoking getmail,

#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/getmail --rcfile /opt/rt4/etc/getmailrc


Looks like getmail is retrieving mails from the mailbox but unable to pass
that onto RT. I'm not sure where rtuser and rtgroup is to be created.

Is it a OS system user?
Is it an user in AD?
Is it an privileged user in RT?

I'm hoping once the user is created in the correct location, getmail will
populate RT - Geberal queue

Thanks in advance,
Steve

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] RT Newbie: Inbound email by getmail fails at unknown rtuser

2011-12-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 14:03, RT User myrtu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Looks like getmail is retrieving mails from the mailbox but unable to pass
 that onto RT. I'm not sure where rtuser and rtgroup is to be created.

As far as I understand output, getmail fails to find rtuser in the
system. RT doesn't create such account. --with-bin-owner option in
configure script defaults to root. Files in bin dir are owned by this
account and group is set to value of --with-web-group option (default
www). If you don't want to getmail to run mailgate script as root then
use user account that is in www group. Most probably you have www user
in www group. It's also possible that this group is called apache,
httpd or something else.

 Is it a OS system user?

It's system user. As I understand it. getmail for security reasons
allows you to define system user and group to run commands under. You
start getmail as root, it inits itself and then switches to user/group
you defined. This lowers privileges of getmail and programs it
executes.

 Is it an user in AD?
 Is it an privileged user in RT?

This has nothing to do with AD and/or RT.

-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

2011-12-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 13:19, Thomas Lau thomas@principleone.com wrote:
 I could set due before Dec 10 2011, but I can't set display all ticket which 
 due before Dec 10 2011, 2PM, how do you do such query?

Due  '2011-11-10 14:00:00'

-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09 a bit too eager?

2011-12-16 Thread Iulian Dragan
Thank you Kevin, I got rid of those parameters and everything is now fine.

Best regards,
Iulian 
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

2011-12-16 Thread Thomas Lau
Thanks, but does query could show ticket which due date and time is 30minutes 
away from now? 

--
BlackBerry solution provided by www.principleone.com


- Original Message -
From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com
To: Thomas Lau
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Sent: Fri Dec 16 19:20:49 2011
Subject: Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 13:19, Thomas Lau thomas@principleone.com wrote:
 I could set due before Dec 10 2011, but I can't set display all ticket which 
 due before Dec 10 2011, 2PM, how do you do such query?

Due  '2011-11-10 14:00:00'

-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

2011-12-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 16:27, Thomas Lau thomas@principleone.com wrote:
 Thanks, but does query could show ticket which due date and time is 30minutes 
 away from now?

SearchByDates page on the wiki.



 --
 BlackBerry solution provided by www.principleone.com


 - Original Message -
 From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com
 To: Thomas Lau
 Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Sent: Fri Dec 16 19:20:49 2011
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

 On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 13:19, Thomas Lau thomas@principleone.com wrote:
 I could set due before Dec 10 2011, but I can't set display all ticket which 
 due before Dec 10 2011, 2PM, how do you do such query?

 Due  '2011-11-10 14:00:00'

 --
 Best regards, Ruslan.
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston  March 5  6, 2012



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012

[rt-users] RT 3.8.7 Patch?

2011-12-16 Thread Joe Kirby
UMBC is working on an upgrade to 4.04 however we will not go live until after 
our Spring 2012 semester ends, May 2012

We are experiencing a situation where the sort order of our Custom Fields is 
not being honored when presented and I have a need to have this work in 3.8.7 
or a version I can upgrade to with very little impact on the user community.

A patch would be preferable

We are running on Solaris with Oracle 10g. This particular queue requires 6 CF's

Ideas?

Thanks in advance

Joe


Joe Kirby ,  Assistant Vice President, Business Systems
Division of Information Technology (DoIT) 
Support Response -   http://www.umbc.edu/oit 
Administration 627
Office - 410-455-3020 
Email - ki...@umbc.edu


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8.7 Patch?

2011-12-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Hello Joe,

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 16:40, Joe Kirby ki...@umbc.edu wrote:
 UMBC is working on an upgrade to 4.04 however we will not go live until
 after our Spring 2012 semester ends, May 2012

 We are experiencing a situation where the sort order of our Custom Fields is
 not being honored when presented and I have a need to have this work in
 3.8.7 or a version I can upgrade to with very little impact on the user
 community.

 A patch would be preferable

 We are running on Solaris with Oracle 10g. This particular queue requires 6
 CF's

 Ideas?

Does your policy allows to update DBIx::SearchBuilder module and RT to
3.8.latest?

 Thanks in advance

 Joe

-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012


[rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2011-12-16 Thread mjames
This may be a bug in the way attachments are handled in 4.0.4.

We recently spun up a new instance of RT 4.0.2, then upgraded to 4.0.4. Running 
on Centos 5.7 using MySQL. Yesterday we were at ticket #53. A user sent an 
email last night with an attachment containing sql statements (a database 
backup). His ticket id is #63.

There aren't any intervening tickets. When I use the quick search for example, 
and try to load a ticket between 53-63, I get an error:

RT Error Could not load ticket 57 (for example)

The only thing I can think of is that some of the statements in the attachment 
were acted on. Is this possible?

Mike

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs - confirm how it works

2011-12-16 Thread Mike Johnson
Hmm,

So, ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs looks at the To and Cc block and adds any
address that doesn't match the regular expression to the ticket.

So

To: RTQueue;Tom;Sue
Cc:Jerry
From: Bob

With ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs off

Result is a ticket with Bob as the requestor, and Tom, Sue, Jerry aren't
attached to the ticket in anyway.

With it on

Result is a ticket with Bob as the requestor, Tom, Sue and Jerry all are
Cc's on the ticket?

Thanks Ruslan!
Mike.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ruslan Zakirov r...@bestpractical.comwrote:

 On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 19:06, Mike Johnson mike.john...@nosm.ca wrote:
  HI everyone,
 
  I just wanted to get confirmation on how the ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs
  work.
 
  http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/EmailInterface
 
  Specifically,
 
  ParseNewMessageForTicketCcs (boolean) - when
 $ParseNewMessageForTicketCcs is
  true, RT automatically adds email addresses found in the Cc header to the
  ticket's Cc at creation.
 
  If a new message comes in that is
 
  To: foo1, foo2, fooN
  Cc: bar1
  From: bar2
 
  And foo1, and foo2 go to 2 different queues
 
  RT will:
  - create a ticket in foo1's queue
  - create a ticket in foo2's queue

 Right, as RT would receive two emails actually.

  - add bar1 as a CC on both tickets
  - make the requestor of both tickets bar2
 
 
  RT will not add foo2 - fooN as anything to foo1's ticket as these
 addresses
  are in the To block, not the Cc block.

 It would use To actually, but skip all RT addresses. To do the latter
 RT should be properly configured to know all its addresses.

  I don't have a good testing bed right now, and was hoping someone had
 tested
  this already or can confirm that is how it works before I flip the
 switch :P

 Looked into code. Grep fro option name, it's only used in one place.

 
  Thanks!
  Mike.
 
  --
  Mike Johnson
  Datatel Programmer/Analyst
  Northern Ontario School of Medicine
  955 Oliver Road
  Thunder Bay, ON   P7B 5E1
  Phone: (807) 766-7331
  Email: mike.john...@nosm.ca
 
  
  RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
  * Boston — March 5  6, 2012



 --
 Best regards, Ruslan.




-- 
Mike Johnson
Datatel Programmer/Analyst
Northern Ontario School of Medicine
955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON   P7B 5E1
Phone: (807) 766-7331
Email: mike.john...@nosm.ca

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs - confirm how it works

2011-12-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 19:05, Mike Johnson mike.john...@nosm.ca wrote:
 Hmm,

 So, ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs looks at the To and Cc block and adds any
 address that doesn't match the regular expression to the ticket.

 So

 To: RTQueue;Tom;Sue
 Cc:Jerry
 From: Bob

 With ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs off

 Result is a ticket with Bob as the requestor, and Tom, Sue, Jerry aren't
 attached to the ticket in anyway.

 With it on

 Result is a ticket with Bob as the requestor, Tom, Sue and Jerry all are
 Cc's on the ticket?

Yep.


 Thanks Ruslan!
 Mike.

 On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ruslan Zakirov r...@bestpractical.com
 wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 19:06, Mike Johnson mike.john...@nosm.ca wrote:
  HI everyone,
 
  I just wanted to get confirmation on how the ParseNewMessageForTicketCCs
  work.
 
  http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/EmailInterface
 
  Specifically,
 
  ParseNewMessageForTicketCcs (boolean) - when
  $ParseNewMessageForTicketCcs is
  true, RT automatically adds email addresses found in the Cc header to
  the
  ticket's Cc at creation.
 
  If a new message comes in that is
 
  To: foo1, foo2, fooN
  Cc: bar1
  From: bar2
 
  And foo1, and foo2 go to 2 different queues
 
  RT will:
  - create a ticket in foo1's queue
  - create a ticket in foo2's queue

 Right, as RT would receive two emails actually.

  - add bar1 as a CC on both tickets
  - make the requestor of both tickets bar2
 
 
  RT will not add foo2 - fooN as anything to foo1's ticket as these
  addresses
  are in the To block, not the Cc block.

 It would use To actually, but skip all RT addresses. To do the latter
 RT should be properly configured to know all its addresses.

  I don't have a good testing bed right now, and was hoping someone had
  tested
  this already or can confirm that is how it works before I flip the
  switch :P

 Looked into code. Grep fro option name, it's only used in one place.

 
  Thanks!
  Mike.
 
  --
  Mike Johnson
  Datatel Programmer/Analyst
  Northern Ontario School of Medicine
  955 Oliver Road
  Thunder Bay, ON   P7B 5E1
  Phone: (807) 766-7331
  Email: mike.john...@nosm.ca
 
  
  RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
  * Boston — March 5  6, 2012



 --
 Best regards, Ruslan.




 --
 Mike Johnson
 Datatel Programmer/Analyst
 Northern Ontario School of Medicine
 955 Oliver Road
 Thunder Bay, ON   P7B 5E1
 Phone: (807) 766-7331
 Email: mike.john...@nosm.ca

 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston — March 5  6, 2012



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

2011-12-16 Thread Thomas Lau
All work fine now, thanks 

--
BlackBerry solution provided by www.principleone.com


- Original Message -
From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com
To: Thomas Lau
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Sent: Fri Dec 16 20:32:28 2011
Subject: Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 16:27, Thomas Lau thomas@principleone.com wrote:
 Thanks, but does query could show ticket which due date and time is 30minutes 
 away from now?

SearchByDates page on the wiki.



 --
 BlackBerry solution provided by www.principleone.com


 - Original Message -
 From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com
 To: Thomas Lau
 Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Sent: Fri Dec 16 19:20:49 2011
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] SLA due exceed monitor

 On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 13:19, Thomas Lau thomas@principleone.com wrote:
 I could set due before Dec 10 2011, but I can't set display all ticket which 
 due before Dec 10 2011, 2PM, how do you do such query?

 Due  '2011-11-10 14:00:00'

 --
 Best regards, Ruslan.
 
 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
 * Boston  March 5  6, 2012



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston  March 5  6, 2012

[rt-users] RT 4.04 and Articles

2011-12-16 Thread Joe Kirby
Our organization has not used RTFM at all and when I begin to explore Articles 
within RT 4.04 I see a couple of things that I think may be our lack of 
experience with this aspect.

1. There does not seem to be a way for me to add any Content since it is always 
just a header and no box for entry

2. When I try to extract an article from and existing ticket I get all the 
History with an apparent option to select which comments or replies I am 
interested in however there is nothing in the drop down menu for selecting so I 
can only add all history by hitting Create at the bottom of the screen


Is there a good doc area for Articles that I may use to assist me in RT 4.04 
setup?

This really looks cool and I think it will really help our users

Thanks again for all the support given via this list serve

Joe


Joe Kirby ,  Assistant Vice President, Business Systems
Division of Information Technology (DoIT) 
Support Response -   http://www.umbc.edu/oit 
Administration 627
Office - 410-455-3020 
Email - ki...@umbc.edu


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] Cosmetic Bug in RT 4.0.4: Date and Time partially visible

2011-12-16 Thread 20/20 Lab
I was also able to reproduce this in Firefox 8, on an XP machine, 
running 4.0.3.   Tho I cant say I've ever noticed it before.


On 12/16/2011 12:01 AM, Stefan Vollmar wrote:

Hi,

we have found a bug in RT (4.0.4) related to the Date and Time-picker
used to create reminders. To reproduce this bug, select a ticket and
then click into the Due text box in the Reminders widget of the
ticket overview. Next, select a date. If your browser window is not wide
enough, the time selection ui will be cut off at the windows edge. We
found this behavior using both Chromium and Firefox on Linux (see
screenshots). It is probably present in other browsers as well.

Warm regards,
  Stefan



RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston --- March 5  6, 2012



RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

[rt-users] User with no WatchAsAdminCc right was added as AdminCc

2011-12-16 Thread Gerard FENELON

Hi

One of my privileged users A was able to add another user B as AdminCc
even though that second User B does not have the WatchAsAdminCc right as 
far as I can make out.


User B is not privileged.
User B does not have any rights for that Queue in 
Admin/Queues/UserRights.html


User B belongs to only one group C directly.
Group C is not included in any other.
Group C does not have any rights in Admin/Groups/GroupRights.html
Group C does not have any rights for that Queue in 
Admin/Queues/GroupRights.html


The WatchAsAdminCc right on that queue is only given to User-defined 
groups to which User B does not belong either directly or indirectly.


If I look at the RightsMatrix for User B, he does not have 
WatchAsAdminCc right on any queue.
If I look at the RightsMatrix for Group C, it does not have 
WatchAsAdminCc right on any queue.


User A has the following rights on that queue C

 * CommentOnTicket
 * CreateTicket
 * ModifyTicket
 * OwnTicket
 * ReplyToTicket
 * SeeQueue
 * ShowACL
 * ShowOutgoingEmail
 * ShowTicket
 * ShowTicketComments
 * StealTicket
 * TakeTicket
 * Watch
 * WatchAsAdminCc

*
*Any ideas where I might have messed up ?

Gerard


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] User with no WatchAsAdminCc right was added as AdminCc

2011-12-16 Thread Gerard FENELON

Using RT 3.8.8

On 2011-12-16 17:24, Gerard FENELON wrote:

Hi

One of my privileged users A was able to add another user B as AdminCc
even though that second User B does not have the WatchAsAdminCc right 
as far as I can make out.


User B is not privileged.
User B does not have any rights for that Queue in 
Admin/Queues/UserRights.html


User B belongs to only one group C directly.
Group C is not included in any other.
Group C does not have any rights in Admin/Groups/GroupRights.html
Group C does not have any rights for that Queue in 
Admin/Queues/GroupRights.html


The WatchAsAdminCc right on that queue is only given to User-defined 
groups to which User B does not belong either directly or indirectly.


If I look at the RightsMatrix for User B, he does not have 
WatchAsAdminCc right on any queue.
If I look at the RightsMatrix for Group C, it does not have 
WatchAsAdminCc right on any queue.


User A has the following rights on that queue C

  * CommentOnTicket
  * CreateTicket
  * ModifyTicket
  * OwnTicket
  * ReplyToTicket
  * SeeQueue
  * ShowACL
  * ShowOutgoingEmail
  * ShowTicket
  * ShowTicketComments
  * StealTicket
  * TakeTicket
  * Watch
  * WatchAsAdminCc

*
*Any ideas where I might have messed up ?

Gerard



RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

[rt-users] Shredder - some tips

2011-12-16 Thread Mike Johnson
Hi everyone,

I'm looking at shredding a ton of old data from our system and I want to
make sure I am understanding the steps involved to ensure everything is
cleaned up properly.

I have shredder setup and have shredded some tickest through the WebUI to
test things out. All is working in that aspect.

My RT instance has had a fairly long lifecycle where queues have come and
gone. I want to clean up the mess. I want to shred all the stuff that isn't
related to anything recent.

I'm thinking I have to do the following:
- shred all the tickets that aren't in the active queues
- shred all users that aren't attached to anything

On the Shredder page of the Wiki it talks about running rt-validator.

Do I have to run this at all after I've done the shredding?


This is going to shred about 30,000 tickets, and a huge number of Users.
Does the shredding have to be done on a quiet system? I've shred a few
tickets while we were live without issue... I'm just worried that I kick
off a process to shred a large volume and it chokes my server out.

Any experience/input is appreciated.

Thanks!
Mike.

-- 
Mike Johnson
Datatel Programmer/Analyst
Northern Ontario School of Medicine
955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON   P7B 5E1
Phone: (807) 766-7331
Email: mike.john...@nosm.ca

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012

Re: [rt-users] Shredder - some tips

2011-12-16 Thread Brent Wiese
snip


This is going to shred about 30,000 tickets, and a huge number of Users. Does 
the shredding have to be done on a quiet system? I've shred a few tickets while 
we were live without issue... I'm just worried that I kick off a process to 
shred a large volume and it chokes my server out.

Any experience/input is appreciated.

You can limit the number of tickets it shreds with the ; limit, x in the 
plugins line. Ie:
--plugin Tickets=query,Status='deleted';limit,0

Limit of 0 means everything. But you could set that to 100 or 1000 and see how 
it affects your system and then make the call on how many to shred at a time.

Brent


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston — March 5  6, 2012