[rt-users] This message will be sent to... question

2008-08-01 Thread Mathew Snyder
When commenting on or adding correspondence to a ticket via the web UI 
the To: recipient is listed as AdminCc of companyname Ticket #. 
When doing the same via email and Reply All, one of the recipients is 
listed as AdminCc of companyname Ticket #.  This, of course, isn't 
a valid email address so results in a bounced message from our email 
server on that particular address.  The other email address, be it the 
comment or correspondence address makes it through though (as expected).

I've never seen this behaviour before I started administering the RT 
system here at my new job.  It never came up at my last job.  Anyone 
know what would be causing this?

RT v3.6.8 on openSuSE 10.3.

-Mathew
-- 
Keep up with my goings on at http://feeds.feedburner.com/theillien_atom
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] This message will be sent to... question

2008-08-01 Thread Mathew Snyder
Yeah, I'm not surprised that it's RFC-Compliant as you folks at BP do a 
good job of working with standards.  I just hadn't seen it before 
because we used the UseFriendlyToLine parameter at my old job.  But, 
having always had it in place I never had cause to figure out what it 
really did.

Thanks
-Mathew

Jesse Vincent wrote:
 
 On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Mathew Snyder wrote:
 
 When commenting on or adding correspondence to a ticket via the web UI
 the To: recipient is listed as AdminCc of companyname Ticket #.
 When doing the same via email and Reply All, one of the recipients is
 listed as AdminCc of companyname Ticket #.  This, of course, isn't
 a valid email address
 
 Actually, it's RFC-compliant. But not all mail servers are your friend.
 
 See UseFriendlyToLine in the config file to get it sorted out.
 
 -j
 
 
 so results in a bounced message from our email
 server on that particular address.  The other email address, be it the
 comment or correspondence address makes it through though (as expected).

 I've never seen this behaviour before I started administering the RT
 system here at my new job.  It never came up at my last job.  Anyone
 know what would be causing this?

 RT v3.6.8 on openSuSE 10.3.

 -Mathew
 -- 
 Keep up with my goings on at http://feeds.feedburner.com/theillien_atom
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 

-- 
Keep up with my goings on at http://feeds.feedburner.com/theillien_atom
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] This message will be sent to... question

2008-08-01 Thread Mathew Snyder
And I can only guess that Exchange is one that doesn't handle it very 
well.  Although, I think our actual relay might be sendmail which, based 
on the comments in RT_SiteConfig.pm doesn't work with it.

-Mathew

Jesse Vincent wrote:
 
 On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Mathew Snyder wrote:
 
 When commenting on or adding correspondence to a ticket via the web UI
 the To: recipient is listed as AdminCc of companyname Ticket #.
 When doing the same via email and Reply All, one of the recipients is
 listed as AdminCc of companyname Ticket #.  This, of course, isn't
 a valid email address
 
 Actually, it's RFC-compliant. But not all mail servers are your friend.
 
 See UseFriendlyToLine in the config file to get it sorted out.
 
 -j
 
 
 so results in a bounced message from our email
 server on that particular address.  The other email address, be it the
 comment or correspondence address makes it through though (as expected).

 I've never seen this behaviour before I started administering the RT
 system here at my new job.  It never came up at my last job.  Anyone
 know what would be causing this?

 RT v3.6.8 on openSuSE 10.3.

 -Mathew
 -- 
 Keep up with my goings on at http://feeds.feedburner.com/theillien_atom
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 

-- 
Keep up with my goings on at http://feeds.feedburner.com/theillien_atom
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] This message will be sent to... question

2008-08-01 Thread Jesse Vincent

On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Mathew Snyder wrote:

 And I can only guess that Exchange is one that doesn't handle it  
 very well.  Although, I think our actual relay might be sendmail  
 which, based on the comments in RT_SiteConfig.pm doesn't work with it.

Sadly, neither does Apple's Mail.app.  I'm seriously considering  
changing the default.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com