Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
2022-03-03 10:29 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier: > > FWIW, I get exactly the same result on another, > slightly smaller, machine (Debian testing running > on core i5 + 8 GB RAM) : temporary failure on > cycliccover_finite_field.py, permanent failure > on graph.py, (more moderate) overconsumption > of the swap file. Possibly related tickets: - Random failure in cycliccover_finite_field.py https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33304 - Random failure in cycliccover_finite_field.py https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30419 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF0%2BTsLDhJ6cYK4v3hniDpOZ%2BfPoomMm3w%3DPhge6Gbrpww%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
Le mardi 1 mars 2022 à 11:59:22 UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : [ Snip… ] > but I have no easy explanation for the first (temporary) one, > > whose ptestlong.log record is as follows : > > > > ** > > File "src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py", line > 1139, > > in > sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial > > > > Failed example: > > CyclicCover(11, PolynomialRing(GF(1129), 'x')([-1] + [0]*(5-1) + > [1])).frobenius_polynomial() # long time > > Exception raised: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 1943, > > in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ > > (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:10410) > > return cache[k] > > KeyError: ((11,), ()) > > > > During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: > > ... > > SystemError: calling remove_from_pari_stack() inside sig_on() > > ** > > 1 item had failures: > > 1 of 60 in > sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial > > > > > > Of note : this ptestlong run, on a lightly loaded laptop freshly > rebooted, > > entailed a very high use of memory : it used about 18 GB of swap file > > above the 16 GB of RAM. I don’t remember seeing such a high > > RAM usage during ptestlong of the previous versions. > > Was that while testing the same file > > src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py > > that ended up causing a system error? Cant’ tell… Or you could have hit > something similar to the issue reported at Sage Trac ticket 33363: > > (Too) long doctest in sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense.pyx > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33363 > > where a test could sometimes take extremely long (the ticket > does not comment on the memory usage in that case). > Possibly. FWIW, I get *exactly* the same result on another, slightly smaller, machine (Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM) : temporary failure on cycliccover_finite_field.py, permanent failure on graph.py, (more moderate) overconsumption of the swap file. HTH, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/280d953c-b449-4bc2-9be6-847d9544f708n%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
Also *cygwin*-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/1907624649) looks fine. On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 8:35:24 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Tests ran at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/535313 for Linux > *ubuntu* (from -trusty all the way to -jammy): Clean > - also bionic-i386: Clean > *debian* (from -stretch to -sid): Clean > ... except debian-bullseye-standard ( > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145196?check_suite_focus=true) > - *severe numerics* issues, already tracked at > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31621 > *linuxmint* (from -17 to -20.3): Clean > ... except linuxmint-19-standard, 19.3-standard (same numerics issues) > *fedora* (from -26 to -36): Clean > ... except fedora-28-standard ( > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145559?check_suite_focus=true) > *groebner_fan* > ... except fedora-34-standard ( > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145727?check_suite_focus=true) > trouble with *giac* > ... except fedora-36-standard ( > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145792?check_suite_focus=true) > sage.quadratic_forms.binary_qf.*BinaryQF.solve_integer ZeroDivisionError* > *centos (*-7 and -stream-8): Clean > *gentoo*: Clean > *archlinux*: Clean > *opensuse* (-15.3): Clean; -tumbleweed: *fplll* issue - > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33448 > *slackware*: Clean > > > On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html >> >> >> 1e8ba0aac4 (trac/develop, tag: 9.6.beta3) Updated SageMath version to >> 9.6.beta3 >> 0fed9a145e Trac #33392: sage.matrix: Modularization fixes after #33159 >> 5f2efac091 Trac #33391: Remove compile dependency on flint from >> CombinatorialPolyhedron >> 4761943a1b Trac #33389: GenericGraph.distance_matrix: accept keyword >> arguments for matrix constructor >> de4f3f05e3 Trac #33388: Graph: accept keyword arguments for matrix >> constructor in methods returning a matrix >> 4c814d6649 Trac #33387: BipartiteGraph.reduced_adjacency_matrix: accept >> keyword arguments for matrix constructor >> 9b24711f58 Trac #33386: MR55: Make orders unique parents >> ef3270f669 Trac #33376: Apply some coding conventions to >> sage/modular/overconvergent/hecke_series.py >> 57787eddf1 Trac #33371: Remove sage-location and NEW_SAGE_ROOT code >> a7eabd143a Trac #33272: Update sphinx to 4.4 >> 70a841107e Trac #33194: openblas: Update to 0.3.20 >> 714cf9fe3a Trac #33165: faster evaluation of polynomials in R[x] at >> monomials in R[y] or R[u,v] and variables in R[x]/(f) >> 5649402da8 Trac #33001: Invoke manifolds with structure more conveniently >> 3454122b2e Trac #32958: findstat: enforce limit on how many elements to >> compute >> cd78e1bb53 Trac #32953: Sphere: improve handling of default charts >> ef15b5575a Trac #32847: Use lazy_import for module-level import from >> sage.plot (outside of sage.plot) >> f2ed106a91 Trac #32688: Matrix_dense API functions set_unsafe_si vs. >> set_unsafe_int >> 590cfa95d0 Trac #32644: Typos in documentation of >> sage/modular/quasimodform >> 39b19e63df Trac #32121: Generalize MapCombinatorialClass to >> ImageSubobject/ImageSet, add method Map.image >> ff4fc3f93f Trac #31576: Projective points over rings with zero divisors >> ebbf07248d Trac #31355: upgrade lrcalc to 2.1 >> 2c35e81943 Trac #30680: Finitely presented modules over the Steenrod >> algebra >> 02bde440d3 Trac #29927: shifting issue in padic _set_from_list functions >> 5f4c2c49b8 Trac #29919: Restore "huge" package type >> 8c5f78c826 Trac #22081: Add new option to hyperbolic graphics to select >> the model >> 72b70cb269 Trac #14147: weyl group orbit of a weight hangs in infinite >> type >> 47b7c6cbce Trac #33390: singular spkg-configure.m4: Better test for help >> 58e2a16d8c Trac #33390: singular spkg-configure.m4: Better test for help >> b96b86a4bc Trac #33377: GenericGraph.[weighted]adjacency_matrix, >> incidence_matrix: Accept keyword arguments for matrix constructor >> 5705d221fd Trac #33374: adjust error messages in algebras/ >> f71a59cf4d Trac #33367: Adjust some error messages in `combinat/` >> d2b071e65f Trac #33364: remove traces of # py3 and some # py2 >> 518f9fc106 Trac #33358: Fix for rename of conda e-antic package to >> libeantic >> 7abda14ee4 Trac #33357: Random set partition with fixed block sizes does >> not respect the constraint and other improvements >> b17a291d87 Trac #33353: increase tolerance of doctests in >> modular/modform/numerical.py >> bfa90bbd18 Trac #33351: raw docs and other pycodestyle details in some >> pyx files >> 09c55f3d97 Trac #33349: a few details in designs >> ed86487af3 Trac #33342: fix indentation in toy_variety.py >> 2fd405438b Trac #33341: pycodestyle cleaning in convolution.py >> 016f864459 Trac #6: Fix deprecation warning with scipy 1.8. >> a64514b5ce Trac
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
Tests ran at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/535313 for Linux *ubuntu* (from -trusty all the way to -jammy): Clean - also bionic-i386: Clean *debian* (from -stretch to -sid): Clean ... except debian-bullseye-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145196?check_suite_focus=true) - *severe numerics* issues, already tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31621 *linuxmint* (from -17 to -20.3): Clean ... except linuxmint-19-standard, 19.3-standard (same numerics issues) *fedora* (from -26 to -36): Clean ... except fedora-28-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145559?check_suite_focus=true) *groebner_fan* ... except fedora-34-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145727?check_suite_focus=true) trouble with *giac* ... except fedora-36-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145792?check_suite_focus=true) sage.quadratic_forms.binary_qf.*BinaryQF.solve_integer ZeroDivisionError* *centos (*-7 and -stream-8): Clean *gentoo*: Clean *archlinux*: Clean *opensuse* (-15.3): Clean; -tumbleweed: *fplll* issue - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33448 *slackware*: Clean On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > > 1e8ba0aac4 (trac/develop, tag: 9.6.beta3) Updated SageMath version to > 9.6.beta3 > 0fed9a145e Trac #33392: sage.matrix: Modularization fixes after #33159 > 5f2efac091 Trac #33391: Remove compile dependency on flint from > CombinatorialPolyhedron > 4761943a1b Trac #33389: GenericGraph.distance_matrix: accept keyword > arguments for matrix constructor > de4f3f05e3 Trac #33388: Graph: accept keyword arguments for matrix > constructor in methods returning a matrix > 4c814d6649 Trac #33387: BipartiteGraph.reduced_adjacency_matrix: accept > keyword arguments for matrix constructor > 9b24711f58 Trac #33386: MR55: Make orders unique parents > ef3270f669 Trac #33376: Apply some coding conventions to > sage/modular/overconvergent/hecke_series.py > 57787eddf1 Trac #33371: Remove sage-location and NEW_SAGE_ROOT code > a7eabd143a Trac #33272: Update sphinx to 4.4 > 70a841107e Trac #33194: openblas: Update to 0.3.20 > 714cf9fe3a Trac #33165: faster evaluation of polynomials in R[x] at > monomials in R[y] or R[u,v] and variables in R[x]/(f) > 5649402da8 Trac #33001: Invoke manifolds with structure more conveniently > 3454122b2e Trac #32958: findstat: enforce limit on how many elements to > compute > cd78e1bb53 Trac #32953: Sphere: improve handling of default charts > ef15b5575a Trac #32847: Use lazy_import for module-level import from > sage.plot (outside of sage.plot) > f2ed106a91 Trac #32688: Matrix_dense API functions set_unsafe_si vs. > set_unsafe_int > 590cfa95d0 Trac #32644: Typos in documentation of sage/modular/quasimodform > 39b19e63df Trac #32121: Generalize MapCombinatorialClass to > ImageSubobject/ImageSet, add method Map.image > ff4fc3f93f Trac #31576: Projective points over rings with zero divisors > ebbf07248d Trac #31355: upgrade lrcalc to 2.1 > 2c35e81943 Trac #30680: Finitely presented modules over the Steenrod > algebra > 02bde440d3 Trac #29927: shifting issue in padic _set_from_list functions > 5f4c2c49b8 Trac #29919: Restore "huge" package type > 8c5f78c826 Trac #22081: Add new option to hyperbolic graphics to select > the model > 72b70cb269 Trac #14147: weyl group orbit of a weight hangs in infinite type > 47b7c6cbce Trac #33390: singular spkg-configure.m4: Better test for help > 58e2a16d8c Trac #33390: singular spkg-configure.m4: Better test for help > b96b86a4bc Trac #33377: GenericGraph.[weighted]adjacency_matrix, > incidence_matrix: Accept keyword arguments for matrix constructor > 5705d221fd Trac #33374: adjust error messages in algebras/ > f71a59cf4d Trac #33367: Adjust some error messages in `combinat/` > d2b071e65f Trac #33364: remove traces of # py3 and some # py2 > 518f9fc106 Trac #33358: Fix for rename of conda e-antic package to > libeantic > 7abda14ee4 Trac #33357: Random set partition with fixed block sizes does > not respect the constraint and other improvements > b17a291d87 Trac #33353: increase tolerance of doctests in > modular/modform/numerical.py > bfa90bbd18 Trac #33351: raw docs and other pycodestyle details in some pyx > files > 09c55f3d97 Trac #33349: a few details in designs > ed86487af3 Trac #33342: fix indentation in toy_variety.py > 2fd405438b Trac #33341: pycodestyle cleaning in convolution.py > 016f864459 Trac #6: Fix deprecation warning with scipy 1.8. > a64514b5ce Trac #5: fix E111 (indentation) in geometry, groups, logic, > matrix > aa255bf264 Trac #4: fix E111 (indentation) in rings > b35def6864 Trac #3: Deduplicate package names in installation guide > df13563584 Trac #2: fix E111 (indentation) in dynamics, numerical, > modules, interfaces
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
The SystemError: calling remove_from_pari_stack() inside sig_on() in cycliccover_finite_field.py is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33304 On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 11:00:26 AM UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, upgrading > 9.6.beta1 to 9.6.beta3 and running ptestlong gets me one temporary > failure : > > sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 > --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 > src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py # 1 doctest failed > > and one permanent failure : > > sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 > --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py > # 1 doctest failed > > The second one seems to be numerical noise : > > charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 > --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py > # 1 doctest failed > Running doctests with ID 2022-03-01-10-43-41-a97dd6df. > Git branch: develop > Using > --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,pip,sage,sage_spkg > Features to be detected: > 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,plantri,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib > Doctesting 1 file. > sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 > --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py > ** > File "src/sage/graphs/graph.py", line 8586, in > sage.graphs.graph.Graph.effective_resistance > Failed example: > H.effective_resistance(1, 5, base_ring=RDF) > Expected: > 1.2... > Got: > 1.1997 > ** > 1 item had failures: >1 of 22 in sage.graphs.graph.Graph.effective_resistance > [1233 tests, 1 failure, 20.14 s] > -- > sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 > --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py > # 1 doctest failed > -- > Total time for all tests: 20.3 seconds > cpu time: 18.7 seconds > cumulative wall time: 20.1 seconds > Features detected for doctesting: sage.groups,sage.symbolic > Pytest is not installed, skip checking tests that rely on it. > > but I have no easy explanation for the first (temporary) one, whose > ptestlong.log record is as follows : > > sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 > --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 > src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py > ** > File "src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py", line 1139, > in > sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial > Failed example: > CyclicCover(11, PolynomialRing(GF(1129), 'x')([-1] + [0]*(5-1) + > [1])).frobenius_polynomial() # long time > Exception raised: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 1943, in > sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ > (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:10410) > return cache[k] > KeyError: ((11,), ()) > > During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", > line 694, in _run > self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) > File > "/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", > line 1088, in compile_and_execute > exec(compiled, globs) > File " sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial[23]>", > line 1, in > CyclicCover(Integer(11), PolynomialRing(GF(Integer(1129)), > 'x')([-Integer(1)] + [Integer(0)]*(Integer(5)-Integer(1)) + > [Integer(1)])).frobenius_polynomial() # long time > File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 2310, in > sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCallerNoArgs.__call__ > (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:13020) > self.cache = f(self._instance) > File > "/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py", > line 1234, in frobenius_polynomial > F =
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta2 with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/959d19f8-d818-4728-9f6e-e72a51dbe572n%40googlegroups.com.
Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
2022-03-01 10:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier: > > FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, > upgrading 9.6.beta1 to 9.6.beta3 and running ptestlong >gets me one temporary failure : > > ... src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py # 1 doctest > failed > > and one permanent failure : > > ... src/sage/graphs/graph.py # 1 doctest failed > > The second one seems to be numerical noise : > > ** > File "src/sage/graphs/graph.py", line 8586, in > sage.graphs.graph.Graph.effective_resistance > Failed example: > H.effective_resistance(1, 5, base_ring=RDF) > Expected: > 1.2... > Got: > 1.1997 > ** Taken care of by Sage Trac ticket 33427: numerical noise in effective_resistance involving RDF https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33427 where a fix already has been positively reviewed. > but I have no easy explanation for the first (temporary) one, > whose ptestlong.log record is as follows : > > ** > File "src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py", line 1139, > in > sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial > Failed example: > CyclicCover(11, PolynomialRing(GF(1129), 'x')([-1] + [0]*(5-1) + > [1])).frobenius_polynomial() # long time > Exception raised: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 1943, > in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ > (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:10410) > return cache[k] > KeyError: ((11,), ()) > > During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: > ... > SystemError: calling remove_from_pari_stack() inside sig_on() > ** > 1 item had failures: >1 of 60 in > sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial > > Of note : this ptestlong run, on a lightly loaded laptop freshly rebooted, > entailed a very high use of memory : it used about 18 GB of swap file > above the 16 GB of RAM. I don’t remember seeing such a high > RAM usage during ptestlong of the previous versions. Was that while testing the same file src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py that ended up causing a system error? Or you could have hit something similar to the issue reported at Sage Trac ticket 33363: (Too) long doctest in sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense.pyx https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33363 where a test could sometimes take extremely long (the ticket does not comment on the memory usage in that case). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF2ZGr%2B8XagPJAoYURrOjgsovUJnuSO2QCXAR9fSo3%2BNHw%40mail.gmail.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released
FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, upgrading 9.6.beta1 to 9.6.beta3 and running ptestlong gets me one temporary failure : sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py # 1 doctest failed and one permanent failure : sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py # 1 doctest failed The second one seems to be numerical noise : charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py # 1 doctest failed Running doctests with ID 2022-03-01-10-43-41-a97dd6df. Git branch: develop Using --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,plantri,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib Doctesting 1 file. sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py ** File "src/sage/graphs/graph.py", line 8586, in sage.graphs.graph.Graph.effective_resistance Failed example: H.effective_resistance(1, 5, base_ring=RDF) Expected: 1.2... Got: 1.1997 ** 1 item had failures: 1 of 22 in sage.graphs.graph.Graph.effective_resistance [1233 tests, 1 failure, 20.14 s] -- sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/graphs/graph.py # 1 doctest failed -- Total time for all tests: 20.3 seconds cpu time: 18.7 seconds cumulative wall time: 20.1 seconds Features detected for doctesting: sage.groups,sage.symbolic Pytest is not installed, skip checking tests that rely on it. but I have no easy explanation for the first (temporary) one, whose ptestlong.log record is as follows : sage -t --long --warn-long 245.4 --random-seed=61034896171412036953396016057425531267 src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py ** File "src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py", line 1139, in sage.schemes.cyclic_covers.cycliccover_finite_field.CyclicCover_finite_field.frobenius_polynomial Failed example: CyclicCover(11, PolynomialRing(GF(1129), 'x')([-1] + [0]*(5-1) + [1])).frobenius_polynomial() # long time Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 1943, in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:10410) return cache[k] KeyError: ((11,), ()) During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 694, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1088, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "", line 1, in CyclicCover(Integer(11), PolynomialRing(GF(Integer(1129)), 'x')([-Integer(1)] + [Integer(0)]*(Integer(5)-Integer(1)) + [Integer(1)])).frobenius_polynomial() # long time File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 2310, in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCallerNoArgs.__call__ (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:13020) self.cache = f(self._instance) File "/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py", line 1234, in frobenius_polynomial F = self.frobenius_matrix(self._N0) File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 1948, in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:10546) w = self._instance_call(*args, **kwds) File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 1824, in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller._instance_call (build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:10012) return self.f(self._instance, *args, **kwds) File
