[sage-support] Re: Maxima default mode
It says there the language can be selected by a long tap on the 'sage' button in the cell, or in the app settings. This did not register with me when I first read it! Apologies for wasting people's time, Not at all, others will search for this and find the answer! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-support group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [sage-support] Re: Maxima-in-Sage versus plain Maxima
On 2013-03-04 17:30, William Stein wrote:
sage: sage.calculus.all.maxima_calculus('domain: real')
Thanks, that helps but it's not really something you want to tell your
students using Sage...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[sage-support] Re: Maxima-in-Sage versus plain Maxima
On Monday, March 4, 2013 9:26:47 AM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
It seems that Maxima in Sage doesn't do some simplifications that plain
Maxima does, why is this and how can this be fixed?
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) abs(cos(t))^2;
2
(%o1) cos (t)
(%i1) domain:complex;
(%o1) complex
(%i2) abs(cos(t))^2
;
2
(%o2)abs(cos(t))
versus
(%i1) abs(cos(t))^2;
2
(%o1) cos (t)
--
| Sage Version 5.7, Release Date: 2013-02-19 |
| Type notebook() for the browser-based notebook interface.|
| Type help() for help.|
--
sage: maxima('abs(cos(t))^2;')
abs(cos(t))^2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [sage-support] Re: Maxima-in-Sage versus plain Maxima
Fair enough, but what if I want the domain: real behaviour in Sage? In
other words, what should do to have (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify() return
cos(t)^2?
sage: maxima('domain: real;')
real
sage: var(t)
t
sage: assume(t, real)
sage: (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify()
abs(cos(t))^2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [sage-support] Re: Maxima-in-Sage versus plain Maxima
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
Fair enough, but what if I want the domain: real behaviour in Sage? In
other words, what should do to have (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify() return
cos(t)^2?
sage: maxima('domain: real;')
Use the maxima that the sage symbolics use:
wstein@01salvus:~/explicit$ sage
--
| Sage Version 5.3, Release Date: 2012-09-08 |
| Type notebook() for the browser-based notebook interface.|
| Type help() for help.|
--
sage: sage.calculus.all.maxima_calculus('domain: real')
real
sage: var(t)
t
sage: assume(t, real)
sage: (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify()
cos(t)^2
real
sage: var(t)
t
sage: assume(t, real)
sage: (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify()
abs(cos(t))^2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [sage-support] Re: Maxima-in-Sage versus plain Maxima
On 03/04/2013 11:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Fair enough, but what if I want the domain: real behaviour in Sage? In
other words, what should do to have (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify() return
cos(t)^2?
sage: maxima('domain: real;')
real
sage: var(t)
t
sage: assume(t, real)
sage: (abs(cos(t))^2).simplify()
abs(cos(t))^2
This is what I use in my ~/.sage, without any error checking:
def set_simplification_domain(d):
Set Maxima's simplification domain.
INPUT:
- ``d`` -- The domain, either 'real' or 'complex'.
TESTS:
With the default 'complex' domain, we don't simplify this::
sage: (abs(x)^2).simplify()
abs(x)^2
But in the 'real' domain, we do::
sage: set_simplification_domain('real')
'real'
sage: (abs(x)^2).simplify()
x^2
sage: set_simplification_domain('complex')
'complex'
cmd = 'domain: %s;' % d
result = maxima_lib._eval_line(cmd)
return result
At some point, I had a patch that made this available through e.g.,
sage: maxima_lib.domain = 'real'
with appropriate error checking. But I couldn't figure out how to
document the property, which does one thing as a getter and another as a
setter.
Plus, fooling with the maxima domain feels kind of hacky. Users
shouldn't have to configure the underlying libraries that sage uses,
although it would be nice to have the option in the meantime.
The super-feature that would obviate twiddling the domain would be to
determine whether or not all terms in an expression are real, and set
the maxima domain automatically when manipulating pure-real expressions.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[sage-support] Re: Maxima problem?
Hi Thanks for the help re distributions. My sage version is 4.7 as I downloaded a new version two days ago to try and see whether the problem had been corrected in a newer version. Cheers Nigel -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Maxima problem?
FYI, the interface to Maxima changed in 4.7.1.alpha0 IIRC, so you could also try one of the more recent alphas available at: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/ The things with MARKER are not involved in that new interface. On 10 juin, 08:34, NigelSmart ni...@cs.bris.ac.uk wrote: Hi Thanks for the help re distributions. My sage version is 4.7 as I downloaded a new version two days ago to try and see whether the problem had been corrected in a newer version. Cheers Nigel -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Maxima problem?
On Jun 10, 6:40 am, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, the interface to Maxima changed in 4.7.1.alpha0 IIRC, so you could also try one of the more recent alphas available at:http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/ The things with MARKER are not involved in that new interface. Thanks, JP - that was what I was referring to, but didn't know whether this problem would be fixed or not. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Maxima problem?
Dear Nigel,
There are two questions here.
1) How to get distributions in Sage.
2) How to get Maxima to not crash.
The second one is harder than the first.But if your Sage is not
quite new, we have a different interface to Maxima that might (only
might) help. What version do you have? (Type version().)
As to the first, the RealDistribution command might help you.
Assuming that normal=Gaussian, then from the doc:
The gaussian distribution takes 1 parameter ``sigma``. The
standard
gaussian distribution has ``sigma = 1``:
sage: sigma = 1
sage: T = RealDistribution('gaussian', sigma)
sage: T.get_random_element() # random
0.818610064197
sage: T.distribution_function(0)
0.398942280401
sage: T.cum_distribution_function(1)
0.841344746069
sage: T.cum_distribution_function_inv(.5)
0.0
Unfortunately, the many many ways of getting distributions and
statistics in Sage are not always very easy to find.
- kcrisman
On Jun 9, 1:34 pm, NigelSmart ni...@cs.bris.ac.uk wrote:
Hi
First let me say I am a python and sage novice, but I seem to have a
problem in using
maxima within sage. My sage installation is on a CentOS linux
distribution and I just
unpacked the Redhat distribution and run it. So no clever installation
things done.
Now I have a medium'ish program (1500 lines) which at one point needs
access to
normal variates. I see maxima has this so I define a function
maxima(load(distrib));
def MultiVarNormal(n,r):
s=maxima(random_normal(0,%s,%s)%(r,n));
return s;
and run my program. Firstly the above function creates a significant
slow down (compared to the dummy code I give later) and eventually I
get a crash with the following error message
/home/crypto/linux.x86_64/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/
structure/parent.so in sage.structure.parent.Parent.__call__ (sage/
structure/parent.c:6820)()
/home/crypto/linux.x86_64/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/
structure/coerce_maps.so in
sage.structure.coerce_maps.NamedConvertMap._call_ (sage/structure/
coerce_maps.c:4221)()
/home/crypto/linux.x86_64/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/
interfaces/maxima.pyc in _real_double_(self, R)
1896 2.41421356237
1897
- 1898 return R(self._sage_())
1899
1900 def real(self):
/home/crypto/linux.x86_64/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/
interfaces/maxima.pyc in _sage_(self)
1822 import sage.calculus.calculus as calculus
1823 return
calculus.symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string(self.name(),
- 1824 maxima=self.parent())
1825
1826 def _symbolic_(self, R):
/home/crypto/linux.x86_64/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/
calculus/calculus.pyc in symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string(x,
equals_sub, maxima)
1652 return symbolic_expression_from_string(s, syms,
accept_sequence=True)
1653 except SyntaxError:
- 1654 raise TypeError, unable to make sense of Maxima
expression '%s' in Sage%s
1655 finally:
1656 is_simplified = False
TypeError: unable to make sense of Maxima expression
'__SAGE_SYNCHRO_MARKER_135903684' in Sage
Now as a test that it is the above maxima function causing the
problems I replace the
above code with
def MultiVarNormal_V2(n,r):
s=[1..n];
for i in range(0,n):
s[i]=randint(-r,r);
return s;
OK Its no longer a normal distribution, but this is just a testing
idea. The code now runs very fast and does not produce the crash. So
this leads me to think it is the above function causing the problems.
One initially suspects it could be some form of memory leak/corruption
as when I move to a bigger machine the original version takes longer
to crash (it still crashes). However, running top whilst the program
runs does not seem to reveal a huge increase in memory. So
I have been unable to produce a small code snippett which produces the
crash since running MultiVarNormal a gazillion times does not seem to
crash.
I am therefore stuck as to how to proceed. Any ideas would be most
welcome. And please remember I really am a python/sage idiot at this
stage.
Yours
Nigel
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Maxima matrix vs Sage matrix
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:57 AM, iDan idans...@live.fr wrote: I obtain a Maxima matrix. How can I transform it into a Sage Matrix On 2 juin, 11:48, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Use Mat.sage(): So elegant and so obvious :-) Thanks!!! Daniel -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima cli compatability
resent after correcting mistake On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Harris mail.dhar...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello 1. In maxima it is possible to use % variable (o1%, o2%, etc) to access previous commands is that also possible in sage (cli and notebook mode). Thanks Dan -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima called by solve() occasionally hangs
On Mar 16, 4:06 pm, tvn nguyenthanh...@gmail.com wrote: I call the function solve() many times in my program and occasionally I notice that the it just stops responding (not frozen, it's just doing nothing). Control + C stops the process which returns error such as Interrupting Maxima. Please wait a few seconds... Usually things will work fine if I just rerun the program again (but then it might hang at a different call to solve()). This happens all the times - is this a known issue ? what can I do to avoid this ? Yes, it's known. Solving large problems uses some pretty intense resources in Maxima trying to go a number of recursion levels deep. See the Maxima documentation for algsys, which is usually where this ends up happening. I don't think there is a fix, unfortunately - I've tried! Unless we were to have a way to indicate an interrupt interval to Maxima - which is conceivable, but would have to alter the interface, and so one would have to do it on one's own using the interface class initialization, I guess, if that's possible there. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima called by solve() occasionally hangs
that's really bad -- I rather have something less efficient (assuming the linear algebra solver in Maximum is fast) but at least deterministic in terms of termination than something perform randomly. In fact I would just rather have it somehow timeouts, returns error rather than just hangs in there. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
On Nov 17, 10:10 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: student tTest Hi, do you know that there is R inside Sage? An example right from sagenb.org: import rpy2.robjects as robjects data = robjects.IntVector([44,55,56,14*2]) ttest = robjects.r['t.test'] print ttest(data) gives: One Sample t-test data: c(44L, 55L, 56L, 28L) t = 7.0263, df = 3, p-value = 0.005922 alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: 25.02843 66.47157 sample estimates: mean of x 45.75 -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
Hi Harald, No I don't have R. I did convert the list(str) to a real list and did a trap on that and it did work. How do I get R into Sage? Thanx On Nov 17, 2:58 pm, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 17, 10:10 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: student tTest Hi, do you know that there is R inside Sage? An example right from sagenb.org: import rpy2.robjects as robjects data = robjects.IntVector([44,55,56,14*2]) ttest = robjects.r['t.test'] print ttest(data) gives: One Sample t-test data: c(44L, 55L, 56L, 28L) t = 7.0263, df = 3, p-value = 0.005922 alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: 25.02843 66.47157 sample estimates: mean of x 45.75 -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
Mikie wrote: Hi Harald, No I don't have R. I did convert the list(str) to a real list and did a trap on that and it did work. How do I get R into Sage? R comes with every Sage install, by default. You don't have to do anything. -Jason -- Jason Grout -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Harald, No I don't have R. I did convert the list(str) to a real list and did a trap on that and it did work. How do I get R into Sage? Every copy of Sage comes with R. William -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima
There are several ways to do this.
sage: maxima_console()
gives you a fully functioning version of Maxima, just as if you
downloaded it yourself.
Or you can use Maxima one thing at a time:
sage: from sage.calculus.calculus import maxima
sage: maxima.eval('integrate(cos(x),x)')
'sin(x)'
Usually it is helpful to import the calculus copy of Maxima, as I
have done.
There are also other interfaces, but they boil down to these, which
should be sufficient. Good luck!
- kcrisman
On Nov 4, 10:22 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is the Maxima that Sage uses a full version? Where is Maxima in the
Sage directory? Can I load Maxima and do some command line work?
Thanx
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Is the Maxima that Sage uses a full version? Yes Where is Maxima in the Sage directory? Can I load Maxima and do some command line work? sage -maxima Thanx -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima
Willian, Thanks, I found it. How do I start it. On Nov 4, 8:35 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Is the Maxima that Sage uses a full version? Yes Where is Maxima in the Sage directory? Can I load Maxima and do some command line work? sage -maxima Thanx -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima
Willian, I found it. In /local/bin/ On Nov 4, 9:26 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Willian, Thanks, I found it. How do I start it. Type ./sage -maxima from the root of your Sage install. -- william On Nov 4, 8:35 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Is the Maxima that Sage uses a full version? Yes Where is Maxima in the Sage directory? Can I load Maxima and do some command line work? sage -maxima Thanx -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima to sage
Yes, David, thanks. I fixed it with repr and SR.
On Nov 3, 1:38 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this help?
sage: f = maxima(x^2-1)
sage: type(f)
class 'sage.interfaces.maxima.MaximaElement'
sage: ff = f.sage()
sage: type(ff)
type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'
sage: ff.factor()
(x - 1)*(x + 1)
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is there anyway to convert a maxima expression
('sage.interfaces.maxima.MaximaElement') to
('sage.calculus.SymbolicArithmetic')?
I need to use Sage's factor instead of Maxima's.
Thanx- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima to sage
Does this help?
sage: f = maxima(x^2-1)
sage: type(f)
class 'sage.interfaces.maxima.MaximaElement'
sage: ff = f.sage()
sage: type(ff)
type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'
sage: ff.factor()
(x - 1)*(x + 1)
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is there anyway to convert a maxima expression
('sage.interfaces.maxima.MaximaElement') to
('sage.calculus.SymbolicArithmetic')?
I need to use Sage's factor instead of Maxima's.
Thanx
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
JSmath is basically a bunch of javacript routines that takes latex created from sage and displays in the html file. The html is generated in my Python script(server,html). When I call JSmath the first routine is loaded. In the first script it calls another and this is where the problem occurs. One of the problems is that I am calling the JSmath from a server. It is a path problem. I can insert images in the html file. On Sep 2, 11:10 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: Didn't you create the API using the notebook? Yes, I created the simple server, but you can think of that more as reaching under the html/javascript/jsmath layer and exposing the raw computatinal elements themsleves, rather than building on top of that nice GUI. - Robert On Sep 1, 10:02 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mikie wrote: I took out the eval and for some reason it is working. Robert, this is function in my API (AlgCalc) http://pirsqrt.com:1843/ If I would give it to you would you show me how to get JSmath to work? I have talked to you before. You said you were too busy. I have loaded load.js, but when it goes for another .js file it cannot find. You're probably thinking about another Robert--I don't know anything about jsmath. What I would do is look for instructions on their site. - Robert (Bradshaw) On Sep 1, 12:37 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Yes, Robert eval is doing the rounding. How do I fix it? On Sep 1, 12:31 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: I have tried SR. I get a malformed value. Yes, I understand the problem with eval. Do you have any suggestions on how to get the right value into maxima.solve? On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
Didn't you create the API using the notebook? On Sep 1, 10:02 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mikie wrote: I took out the eval and for some reason it is working. Robert, this is function in my API (AlgCalc) http://pirsqrt.com:1843/ If I would give it to you would you show me how to get JSmath to work? I have talked to you before. You said you were too busy. I have loaded load.js, but when it goes for another .js file it cannot find. You're probably thinking about another Robert--I don't know anything about jsmath. What I would do is look for instructions on their site. - Robert (Bradshaw) On Sep 1, 12:37 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Yes, Robert eval is doing the rounding. How do I fix it? On Sep 1, 12:31 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: I have tried SR. I get a malformed value. Yes, I understand the problem with eval. Do you have any suggestions on how to get the right value into maxima.solve? On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: Didn't you create the API using the notebook? Yes, I created the simple server, but you can think of that more as reaching under the html/javascript/jsmath layer and exposing the raw computatinal elements themsleves, rather than building on top of that nice GUI. - Robert On Sep 1, 10:02 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mikie wrote: I took out the eval and for some reason it is working. Robert, this is function in my API (AlgCalc) http://pirsqrt.com:1843/ If I would give it to you would you show me how to get JSmath to work? I have talked to you before. You said you were too busy. I have loaded load.js, but when it goes for another .js file it cannot find. You're probably thinking about another Robert--I don't know anything about jsmath. What I would do is look for instructions on their site. - Robert (Bradshaw) On Sep 1, 12:37 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Yes, Robert eval is doing the rounding. How do I fix it? On Sep 1, 12:31 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: I have tried SR. I get a malformed value. Yes, I understand the problem with eval. Do you have any suggestions on how to get the right value into maxima.solve? On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. - Robert --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Is it possible to fix it? Can you post a complete example (with the equations you are using and the call to MSolveSys) that we can paste into our sage session to see this problem? Thanks, Jason -- Jason Grout --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
I have tried SR. I get a malformed value. Yes, I understand the problem with eval. Do you have any suggestions on how to get the right value into maxima.solve? On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
I took out the eval and for some reason it is working. Robert, this is function in my API (AlgCalc) http://pirsqrt.com:1843/ If I would give it to you would you show me how to get JSmath to work? I have talked to you before. You said you were too busy. I have loaded load.js, but when it goes for another .js file it cannot find. On Sep 1, 12:37 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Yes, Robert eval is doing the rounding. How do I fix it? On Sep 1, 12:31 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: I have tried SR. I get a malformed value. Yes, I understand the problem with eval. Do you have any suggestions on how to get the right value into maxima.solve? On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima Solve sys
On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mikie wrote: I took out the eval and for some reason it is working. Robert, this is function in my API (AlgCalc) http://pirsqrt.com:1843/ If I would give it to you would you show me how to get JSmath to work? I have talked to you before. You said you were too busy. I have loaded load.js, but when it goes for another .js file it cannot find. You're probably thinking about another Robert--I don't know anything about jsmath. What I would do is look for instructions on their site. - Robert (Bradshaw) On Sep 1, 12:37 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Yes, Robert eval is doing the rounding. How do I fix it? On Sep 1, 12:31 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: I have tried SR. I get a malformed value. Yes, I understand the problem with eval. Do you have any suggestions on how to get the right value into maxima.solve? On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Mikie wrote: When I run the server with the function above and the following string from a text box I get [y=-1,x=0]. The string is [3*x-y-1,x+(1/3)*y] It is changing the input value to [3*x-y-1,x] 1/3 = 0 in Python. Also, I hope you realize how dangerous eval(random string someone gave you from the web) is! - Robert On Sep 1, 10:38 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, wrong function def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(eqns) return solns On Sep 1, 10:31 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Mikie wrote: Here is function I am using to solve systems of linear equations. def MSolveSys(syss): eqns=eval(syss) solns=maxima.solve(syss) return solns Works great in the notebook, but when I put it in a Python script it rounds the coeficients of the variables and thus produces bad solutions. Perhaps eval here is the culprit. You might have to parse it a bit yourself. SR(...) will parse expressions. Mikie effectively isn't using eval, right? That line (and the eqns variable) is not being used. Jason -- Jason Grout- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima not able to multiply functions with complex numbers
Dear Mani chandra, something really weird seems to be going on. This is a fresh session of Sage 3.3: sage: complex(0,1)*spherical_bessel_J(1,1) --- TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/king/.sage/temp/mpc739/24191/_home_king__sage_init_sage_0.py in module() /home/king/SAGE/devel/sage-3.2.3/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ sage/structure/element.so in sage.structure.element.RingElement.__mul__ (sage/structure/element.c: 8632)() /home/king/SAGE/devel/sage-3.2.3/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ sage/structure/coerce.so in sage.structure.coerce.CoercionModel_cache_maps.bin_op (sage/structure/ coerce.c:5847)() TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': 'type 'complex'' and 'Symbolic Ring' sage: complex(0,1)*spherical_bessel_J(1,1) 1.0*(sin(1) - cos(1))*I In other words, calling complex(0,1)*spherical_bessel_J(1,1) for the first time yields a bug. Calling it the second time yields a result. Do people agree that this is a bug? Shall I open a ticket? I guess that, as a work-around, you should consider using a different implementation of the complex unit in Sage. There are (at least): * complex(0,1), which AFAIK is a Python builtin * I, which belongs to the Symbolic Ring: sage: I^2 -1 sage: I.parent() Symbolic Ring * The imaginary unit in the complex double field: sage: CDF(0,1) 1.0*I sage: CDF(0,1)^2 -1.0 + 1.22464679915e-16*I As you can see, CDF is numeric with the usual errors of numerical data types. Since spherical_bessel_J lives in the Symbolic world, i guess that using I would work around the error. Cheers, Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima not able to multiply functions with complex numbers
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:56 AM, Mani chandra wrote: Hi, The following function gives me an error. def test(l, r): return complex(0, 1)**l*spherical_bessel_J(l, r) [...] TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': 'type 'complex'' and 'Symbolic Ring' Help appreciated. Thank you This was fixed in http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5423 . E.g. sage: complex(3,1) * SR(I) I*(1.0*I + 3.0) - Robert --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima requested additional constraints in solve()
On 6/9/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QUESTION: What notation in SAGE would you like for assuming
that n is an integer? Would this be OK?
{{{
assume(n, ZZ)
}}}
This would just call
calcmaxima.eval('declare(n,integer)')
{{{
forget()
}}}
I have been thinking about this for the past few days and I cannot
think of a better notation than the one you have presented here.
Thanks :-)
Ted
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima requested additional constraints in solve()
On 6/9/07, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use the solve() function with this code:
var('r2')
c = P*e^(r*n)
d = P*(1+r2)^n
solve(c==d,r2)
I receive the following exception:
...
TypeError: Computation failed since Maxima requested additional
constraints (use assume):
Is n an integer?
Does anyone have any thoughts on ways to fix this problem?
Thanks in advance :-)
SAGE has an assume command for this purpose, but unfortunately
so far we've only implemented assuming inequalities. However,
if you type the following you can directly tell maxima that n is an integer
and solve the above (this is how we'll implement assume n is an integer
in SAGE):
{{{
from sage.calculus.calculus import maxima as calcmaxima
calcmaxima.eval('declare(n,integer)')
var('r2')
c = P*e^(r*n)
d = P*(1+r2)^n
solve(c==d,r2)
///
[r2 == (e^r - 1)]
}}}
QUESTION: What notation in SAGE would you like for assuming
that n is an integer? Would this be OK?
{{{
assume(n, ZZ)
}}}
This would just call
calcmaxima.eval('declare(n,integer)')
{{{
forget()
}}}
would then forget that assumption, etc.
It would be more natural to write assume(n in ZZ), but this won't work,
since n in ZZ gets evaluated to false be Python before it gets passed
to the assume command.
William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima requested additional constraints in solve()
On 6/9/07, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007 13:16, William Stein wrote: It would be more natural to write assume(n in ZZ), but this won't work, since n in ZZ gets evaluated to false be Python before it gets passed to the assume command. This was exactly what I tried when the original e-mail was sent out and realized that it was immediately evaluated. I write this so people don't get the same erroneous idea that I had. I assumed that you could redefine __contains__ to return a symbolic constraint just like was done with the __ge__ and similar operators. But you can't and here's why: Here's box.py class Test: pass class Box: def __contains__(self, x): return Test() sage: import box sage: type(n) class 'sage.calculus.calculus.SymbolicVariable' sage: t = box.Box() sage: n in t True sage: t.__contains__(n) box.Test instance at 0xaf45688c That's really pathetic that the 'in' operator always coerces stuff to a boolean. It seems like a useless feature to me and (IMO) is a bug or mis-feature in python. There is probably a *lot* more behind that design choice that you know, especially from the point of view of efficiency. In any case, it's the way it is; I'm glad you posted the above example since I didn't know that. I do not think assume(n, ZZ) is that confusing or hard to use if it is very clearly documented with examples in the assume command? What do you think? William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima (hence calculus) issues
On 6/4/07, Brandon Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had this same problem on a Intel Mac (Macbook), running 10.4.9. (1) I've put the relevant files for intel here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/libintl/ Put them in SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/ (2) I've changed the clisp package in SAGE to build --without-libintl, so hopefully this problem won't happen in the future. (3) I've put the libintl libraries in my SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/ for my binary build, just in case, and will post a new binary when it's done building. -- William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima (hence calculus) issues
Sorry - Google groups told me to try again. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Maxima (hence calculus) issues
On 5/23/07, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please start SAGE, type
sage: !maxima
then send the output.
sage: !maxima
dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib
Referenced from: /Applications/sage-2.5.3-powerpc-osx-PowerMacintosh-
Darwin/local/lib/maxima/5.12.0/binary-clisp/lisp.run
Reason: image not found
Now I understand what is happening. I don't own a PPC OS X machine,
so I have to build everything on an account on some random very
non-minimally configured PPC machine. Evidently it now has
some library -- libintl.3.dylib, which the Maxima build is picking up.
Your options include:
(1) Try putting the libintl files from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/libintl/
in /usr/local/lib/ on computer or in SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/,
and let me know what happens, or
(2) Wait until I either get a PPC OS X machine (which is something
I have no big desire to do), or
(3) Build SAGE from source yourself. Just get xcode, extract the
SAGE tarball, type make, and wait.
I get the same message when I try to run the Sage maxima directly from
the shell.
This makes a little sense, since the contents of my /usr/local/lib
directory is
libhistory.5.0.dyliblibhistory.alynx
libhistory.5.dylib libhistory.dyliblynx.cfg
which doesn't include this file. But then the question arises, why
did Maxima (and its functions) work before (as well as, where do I get
libintl.3.dylib)?
I suspect that there is something related in the following issue.
Typing divisors?? works fine, typing plot? works fine, but when I try
plot??
I get a long error message (relevant parts below). Then when I retry
divisors??, I get a very similar error message.
In both cases it seems like there is a call to a 'NoneType' object
when trying to call a definition, and it propogates somehow. Could I
be missing a library or other file for this too, which then makes an
object go missing? I have never been able to run plot?? properly, in
any version of Sage, unfortunately, though this error is new.
I'll also mention that I get a similar library missing message,
looking for a file in /Users/was/, which I definitely will never have,
when I try to run gp directly from the shell:
dyld: Library not loaded: /Users/was/sage-2.5.rc2/local/lib/
libreadline.5.2.dylib
Referenced from: /Applications/sage-2.5.3-powerpc-osx-PowerMacintosh-
Darwin/local/bin/gp
Reason: image not found
Trace/BPT trap
Thanks and I hope this helps in development, as well as (potential)
use in calculus this fall.
Error getting source: arg is not a module, class, method, function,
traceback, frame, or code object
---
type 'exceptions.TypeError' Traceback (most recent call
last)
and ending with 483 else:
-- 484 out.write(header('Call def:\t')
+self.format(call_def))
485 call_ds = getdoc(obj.__call__)
486 if call_ds:
type 'exceptions.TypeError': cannot concatenate 'str' and 'NoneType'
objects]
divisors?? [same type of error message
411 if defln:
-- 412 out.write(header('Definition:\t')
+self.format(defln))
413
414 # Docstrings only in detail 0 mode, since source
contains them (we
type 'exceptions.TypeError': cannot concatenate 'str' and 'NoneType'
objects]
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://www.williamstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima fails on OS X
Justin C. Walker wrote: 1) what sage version? 1.5.0.2 2) did you install or upgrade to get to this version? I installed, which is to say I downloaded the above-mentioned tarball and unpacked it. 3) look in 'install.log' and see what the result of the maxima installation really was (it precedes genus2reduction-0.3 for sage 1.5). Find the 'sage-spkg' line for maxima, and then find the next 'sage-spkg' line. The stuff preceding this latter line should tell you what happened to maxima. At this point I'm confused because the tarball was advertised as a pre-built binary for OS X. All the instructions at http://sage.math.washington.edu/SAGEbin/apple_osx/ (which seems to be offline now) mention are unpacking the tarball, and sage itself does work without running the makefile. So there was no install.log to speak of. In the interest of getting an install.log, I ran the makefile, but it crapped out at a not very interesting part, since sage.math.washington.edu is offiline: beginning excerpt of install.log Deleting directories from past builds of previous/current versions of sage-1.5.0.2 Extracting package /Users/ageller/Documents/school/sage-1.5.0.2-PowerMacintosh-Darwin/spkg/standard/sage-1.5.0.2.spkg ... -rw-r--r--1 ageller ageller 107 Dec 14 10:56 /Users/ageller/Documents/school/sage-1.5.0.2-PowerMacintosh- Darwin/spkg/standard/sage-1.5.0.2.spkg Finished extraction sage: After decompressing the directory sage-1.5.0.2 does not exist This means that the corresponding .spkg needs to be downloaded again. http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage//packages/optional/sage-1.5.0.2.spkg -- sage-1.5.0.2.spkg ... IOError: [Errno socket error] (65, 'No route to host') /Users/ageller/Documents/school/sage-1.5.0.2-PowerMacintosh-Darwin/spkg/build bunzip2: Can't open input file sage-1.5.0.2.spkg: No such file or directory. tar: sage-1.5.0.2.spkg: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now end of excerpt In short, I'm very confused about what is included in the sage-1.5.0.2-PowerMacintosh-Darwin.tar.gz tarball, and what one needs to do with it once one has it. Thanks alot for your time and help. Aaron --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: maxima fails on OS X
On Dec 25, 2006, at 10:30 , Comeon Fhqwhgads wrote: Justin C. Walker wrote: 1) what sage version? 1.5.0.2 Hmmm... 2) did you install or upgrade to get to this version? I installed, which is to say I downloaded the above-mentioned tarball and unpacked it. Ah! You used a binary installation, not a 'build from scratch' version. I've not used the former, and it appears that access to the binaries is on hold, pending William's return next year (so I can't double-check what that looks like). In the meantime, if you have the space, go to a temp directory and unpack the 1.5.0.2 tarball again, and see whether 'maxima' shows up in the directory 'local/bin'. Also, verify that the unpacking proceeds without error. At this point I'm confused because the tarball was advertised as a pre-built binary for OS X. All the instructions at http://sage.math.washington.edu/SAGEbin/apple_osx/ (which seems to be offline now) mention are unpacking the tarball, and sage itself does work without running the makefile. So there was no install.log to speak of. You have a right to be confused, since I confused you (more evidence of my effectiveness). In the interest of getting an install.log, I ran the makefile, but it That won't work, for several reasons. The most immediate is the one you found (sage.math is dead). The other is that the tarball you started with is not the one I thought you had. You can (if you are up for new adventures!) fetch the source from a sage mirror: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/download.html Get 1.5.1.2 if you try this. Once you unpack the source tarball (which creates the directory 'sage-1.5.1.2' in your current working directory), change to the new directory and *then* invoke 'make'. It should build everything from scratch with no problems (all pieces are included in the tarball). Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds --- I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish. --- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
