date:20021105

What exactly are you trying to do?

If you change the Unix file permissions this will change immediately without
touching Samba.

If you are changing the permissions given through smb.conf then a simple
'killall -1 smbd' will force all the running smbds to reread smb.conf
without actually interrupting the clients.

If you are adding users to global groups then Windoze actually requires that
the user logs out and in again to get these new group permissions.

HTH
Noel

-Original Message-
From: Mark Matrafajlo [mailto:mark.matrafajlo;diogenesinc.com]
Sent: 05 November 2002 20:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Adding user permissions


Is there a way to grant a user rights to a directory without restarting
samba ?
thx,
Mark

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

FW: [Samba] getent not working / winbindd issues

2002-11-05 Thread Sean Patrick Ingles

I was looking through all my SaMBa documentation with a fine-tooth comb,
and I noticed there is a line in the HOWTO, Section 12.4.3 Pluggable
Authentication Modules in the last paragraph it states: 

PAM is configured by providing control files in the directory
/etc/pam.d/ for each of the services that require authentication. When
an authentication request is made by an application the PAM code in the
C library looks up this control file to determine what modules to load
to do the authentication check and in what order. This interface makes
adding a new authentication service for Winbind very easy, all that
needs to be done is that the pam_winbind.so module is copied to
/lib/security/ and the PAM control files for relevant services are
updated to allow authentication via winbind. See the PAM documentation
for more details.

What exactly are the relevant services for SaMBa?

I've only been updating the /etc/pam.d/login file.

Below is my original question, which remains un-answered and I can't
seem to find any solution to it :(

Looks like I'll just have to deploy this fileserver with 2 logins, 1 to
the domain and 1 to the fileserver :(

-SP


-Original Message-
From: Sean Patrick Ingles 
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] getent not working / winbindd issues




I first start smbd -D and nmbd -D

Then I start winbindd

Then I join the domain (smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r DOMAINCONTROLLER -U
Administrator) It works

Then I check my Secret (wbinfo -t) and it's good

Then I list users and groups (wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g) and it works fine

However I still cannot get getent passwd and getent group working,
it just lists the local users or groups and hangs...

I verified that the libraries were in the /lib folder and symlinked, and
here is the output from ldconfig: 

[root@tux samba]# ldconfig -v | grep winbind
libnss_winbind.so - libnss_winbind.so

I restarted winbindd and typed getent passwd and it just lists my
local passwords and hangs.

Nothing is generated in my log.winbindd when I do this either.

I am also noticing that _occasionally_ the box will not allow anyone to
login until after I kill winbindd and sometimes winbindd locks up most
of the processor until I KILL -9 it.

uname -a: 

Linux tux.#.net 2.4.19 #1 Fri Oct 25 15:39:52 EDT 2002 i686
unknown

Here is my /etc/nsswitch.conf (abbreviated):

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files winbind
group:  files winbind

Here is my smb.conf:

[global]
 workgroup = vsionline
 server string = Samba %v -- TEST --
 security = domain
 password server = vsi-vsi-albany
 winbind uid = 1-2
 winbind gid = 1-2
 winbind separator = +
 winbind cache time = 10
 winbind enum users = Yes
 winbind enum groups = Yes

For reference, here is my /etc/pam.d/login:

[root@tux pam.d]# cat login
#%PAM-1.0
auth   required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
auth   sufficient   /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
auth   sufficient   /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass
auth   required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
auth   required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
accountsufficient   /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
accountrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
password   required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionoptional /lib/security/pam_console.so
[root@tux pam.d]#

Any assistance anyone can provide will be much appreciated!

-SP


===
 
   \/   // Sean Patrick Ingles
\  /   // Jr. Network Engineer
 \/   ___ // 
  \  /   // Vision Systems, Inc.
  __/   /   _/ 142 State Street
   Albany, NY 12207
www.visionsys.com   Landline: +1 518.434.4300 x1406
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax: +1 518.434.4304
 
==
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Swat NOT Working Yet!

2002-11-05 Thread Stephen Kuhn

On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 03:51, Danny Bradley wrote:
 I am running RedHat 8.0 and Samba 2.2.6.  I already provided a proper xinetd file 
and appointed port 901 in /etc/services.  What am I still missing?

For whatever reason, I wasn't able to get to SWAT until I installed
Webmin...also, prior to running Webmin and rebooting, I ran
/usr/sbin/swat just for giggles and grins - after the reboot, and after
getting into Webmin, I was able to get into SWAT via the SERVERS\SAMBA
SERVER icon in Webmin...

...same thing happened on my last 7.2 box, and this is a 7.3 box...like
I said - for whatever reason...dunno...

-- 
Wed Nov  6 08:50:00 EST 2002


|____  |
|   /  \ /| |'-.   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  |
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |kuhn media australia
|  |/ ._/  || |http://kma.0catch.com
|  |'.  `\ | | |stephen kuhn
|  ;/ / | | |email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| |mobile: 0410-728-389
|  '  `-`'   |


If you are not for yourself, who will be for you?
If you are for yourself, then what are you?
If not now, when?
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] SWAT is not starting. Please help?

2002-11-05 Thread Stephen Kuhn

On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 06:07, Danny Bradley wrote:
 I am running RedHat 8.0 and Samba 2.2.6.  I already provided a proper xinetd file 
and appointed port 901 in /etc/services.  What am I still missing?  Also, does a log 
exist which gets updated when swat is attempted?  If so, I can look there and see if 
any error messages are recorded with each SWAT attempt.
 

Try this:
From a term, run /usr/sbin/swat (watch what happens) - then attempt to
access SWAT via your browser. Otherwise, use Webmin to get to it.

-- 
Wed Nov  6 08:55:01 EST 2002


|____  |
|   /  \ /| |'-.   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  |
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |kuhn media australia
|  |/ ._/  || |http://kma.0catch.com
|  |'.  `\ | | |stephen kuhn
|  ;/ / | | |email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| |mobile: 0410-728-389
|  '  `-`'   |


I remember Ulysses well...  Left one day for the post office to mail a
letter,
met a blonde named Circe on the streetcar, and didn't come back for 20
years.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] group privileges on newly created files?

2002-11-05 Thread Rob Thomas

Just curious,

I know you can force a creation mask using create mode, but is there any way to 
enforce under what group ownership a file/directory is created?  My users belong to 
several groups, and I want new files created as owned by a specific group...

Thanks in advance,

-Rob
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Pour le temps des fêtes, doublez vos ventes !

2002-11-05 Thread tdinc

Cher ami,

Ce courriel va changer votre existence.  Vous allez être en mesure d'augmenter
considérablement vos ventes pour la période des fêtes.  Nous vous offrons une
solution de marketing direct qui vous permet de rejoindre plus de 200 000
consommateurs québécois !
Cette solution c'est la publicité par courriel l'outil numéro de marketing direct, son 
prix
et son efficacité dépassent toute autre solution publicitaire !

Même si vous n'avez pas de site Internet, la publicité par courriel peut être très
efficace pour vous !  Nous avons développé plusieurs campagnes promotionnelles
pour des commerçants sans site Internet et les résultats ont été incroyables.

Nous offrons des solutions pour aussi peu que 295 $, donc peu importe votre budget
vous êtes en mesure de faire de la publicité par courriel pour votre compagnie et
d'augmenter considérablement vos ventes !

Nous sommes tellement convaincus que notre solution promotionnelle est rentable,
que si vous ne réussissait pas à faire des ventes au moins 3 fois supérieures du
montant de la solution que vous choisis, nous vous rembourseront.*

Ne perdez plus une seconde contacter nous aujourd'hui pour accroite votre chiffre
d'affaire.

Cette offre n'est valide que si vous répondez avant vendredi le 8 novembre 2002.

Demander Mathieu
Tech-Domaine Inc.
514-244-6747



*Certaines conditions s'appliquent pour cette offre de satisfaction, contactez-nous
pour tous les détails.

**
Ce courriel promotionnel n'est pas du spam.  Ci par contre vous pensez que vous avez
reçu ce courriel par erreur ou que vous ne désirez plus obtenir de courriel de la 
liste de
diffusion : td-promo_des_fêtes_001 veuillez écrire à [EMAIL PROTECTED] en indiquant
clairement dans le sujet remove, tout email ne comportant la mention remove dans le
sujet ne seront pas effacé de la liste
*

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Trouble with groups

This sounds awfully messy Bert.  All those mappings might not be necessary.

I setup a Samba PDC the other week for a customer and we simply used the
'domain admin group =' parameter like this:

domain admin group = admin nkelly root and other samba users

This means when I (nkelly) log in on a workstation I have complete control
over it.

HTH
Noel




-Original Message-
From: Bert Rapp [mailto:bert;rappsonline.com]
Sent: 05 November 2002 19:13
To: Samba List
Subject: Re: [Samba] Trouble with groups


Have I wandered into uncharted territory?  They has to be someone out 
there that can point me in the right direction.  Please help me.  :)

Bert Rapp wrote:

 I'm having trouble getting myself in to the administrators group.  I'm 
 using samba as a domain controller.  I have a samba account called 
 administrator.  I have these settings in my smb.conf::

 domain group map = /etc/samba/groups.mapping
 domain user map = /etc/samba/domainuser.mapping
 local group map = /etc/samba/localgroup.mapping


 This is in my domainuser.mapping to alias the administrator samba 
 account to the linux root account:
 root = \\NORTHTRAILRV\\Administrator

 This is in my groups.mapping to alias admins to the Administrators groups
 admins = Administrators

 This is the group listing in /etc/group:
 admins:x:200:root

 And for fun I have a local group mapping like this:
 admins = BUILTIN\Administrators

 For some reason though, when I log on to the domain as administrator, 
 I still do not have permission to change the time or anything else.

 Does anyone have any suggestions?


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] group privileges on newly created files?

Use the sticky bit:

chown .omnigroup shareddir

chmod g+s shareddir

this will make everything created in the shareddir have the group
'omnigroup'.

HTH

-Original Message-
From: Rob Thomas [mailto:rob;electricmail.com]
Sent: 05 November 2002 22:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] group privileges on newly created files?


Just curious,

I know you can force a creation mask using create mode, but is there any
way to enforce under what group ownership a file/directory is created?  My
users belong to several groups, and I want new files created as owned by a
specific group...

Thanks in advance,

-Rob
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] ms dfs? What is it?

2002-11-05 Thread Michael Heironimus

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:09:45PM -0500, David Shapiro wrote:
 What is msdfs?  What can you do with it that you could not do without it?  

It's a distributed filesystem for Windows, allowing you to split the
logical view of shares from the physical locations. You have one
top-level DFS share that can be mounted by 95 and newer clients (as far
as I know smbclient is not DFS-aware). Within that mounted drive you
have folders representing shares on any number of machines. When you
open one the appropriate share on the appropriate machine is
transparently accessed. It's sort of like mounting shares from several
servers at once, but only having one mounted drive to deal with. I think
MS-DFS also allows for failover and load balancing, one DFS link can
actually point to multiple servers.

I think DFS is mentioned in the Samba documentation, and I know MS has
it described on their web site. Both of those are probably better than
my bird's-eye description.

-- 
Michael Heironimus
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 2.2.6 and Winbind

2002-11-05 Thread Lynn


On Samba 2.2.6 and Winbind I used the following command and all are working:/usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -u (it did list all win 2000 users)/usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -g (it did list all win 2000 groups)
root# getent passwd(it list all Linux users)root# getent group (it list all Linux groups)==

The problem is. When I am at a Linux command line and I tryto logonto Windows 2000 Server it won 't work.
DOMAIN+usernameIn my case it is

user logon:WEBOFFICE+biguserpassword: (password entered)
It prompt for a password, I enter the password, and it said "invaliduser account." I then log on using just a username and leave out WEBOFFICE

user logon: biguser
password: (password entered)
It still gives me the same errorWhat do I need to do to be able to log onto a Win 2000 server from a Linux computer ?Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now

Re: [Samba] obey pam restrictions and encrypted passwords

2002-11-05 Thread Andrew Bartlett

On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 07:52, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Jr. wrote:
 Hello everybody,
 
 I´m using Red Hat 7.3 with Samba setup as a PDC, and
 I´m having a doubt.
 
 I am studying the directive obey pam restrictions
 because I would like to limit the number of logins
 with the same id. The documentation provided by SWAT
 tells me that encrypted passwords (like used by
 Windows98SE) will NOT follow these restrictions.
 
 Anybody could tell me if this information is really
 valid? If yes, there is any other way for me to setup
 Samba PDC server to do not allow more than one login
 with the same ID?

Encrypted passwords will not obey any restrictions that are set for the
'auth' part of PAM.  I just can't work. (What would you send as the
password?)

However, it can obey restrictions set under account or session, and that
is what this option enables.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: [Samba] getent not working / winbindd issues

Sean,

You don't actually need PAM for Samba to act as a Windows file server
dipping into the NT domain lists with winbindd for authentication.

I would remove your PAM configuration stuff and see if that cures it.

I run several large Samba servers here which do file/print to domain users.
There is no adjusted PAM config.

HTH
Noel

-Original Message-
From: Sean Patrick Ingles [mailto:ingless;visionsys.com]
Sent: 05 November 2002 20:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: [Samba] getent not working / winbindd issues


I was looking through all my SaMBa documentation with a fine-tooth comb,
and I noticed there is a line in the HOWTO, Section 12.4.3 Pluggable
Authentication Modules in the last paragraph it states: 

PAM is configured by providing control files in the directory
/etc/pam.d/ for each of the services that require authentication. When
an authentication request is made by an application the PAM code in the
C library looks up this control file to determine what modules to load
to do the authentication check and in what order. This interface makes
adding a new authentication service for Winbind very easy, all that
needs to be done is that the pam_winbind.so module is copied to
/lib/security/ and the PAM control files for relevant services are
updated to allow authentication via winbind. See the PAM documentation
for more details.

What exactly are the relevant services for SaMBa?

I've only been updating the /etc/pam.d/login file.

Below is my original question, which remains un-answered and I can't
seem to find any solution to it :(

Looks like I'll just have to deploy this fileserver with 2 logins, 1 to
the domain and 1 to the fileserver :(

-SP


-Original Message-
From: Sean Patrick Ingles 
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] getent not working / winbindd issues




I first start smbd -D and nmbd -D

Then I start winbindd

Then I join the domain (smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r DOMAINCONTROLLER -U
Administrator) It works

Then I check my Secret (wbinfo -t) and it's good

Then I list users and groups (wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g) and it works fine

However I still cannot get getent passwd and getent group working,
it just lists the local users or groups and hangs...

I verified that the libraries were in the /lib folder and symlinked, and
here is the output from ldconfig: 

[root@tux samba]# ldconfig -v | grep winbind
libnss_winbind.so - libnss_winbind.so

I restarted winbindd and typed getent passwd and it just lists my
local passwords and hangs.

Nothing is generated in my log.winbindd when I do this either.

I am also noticing that _occasionally_ the box will not allow anyone to
login until after I kill winbindd and sometimes winbindd locks up most
of the processor until I KILL -9 it.

uname -a: 

Linux tux.#.net 2.4.19 #1 Fri Oct 25 15:39:52 EDT 2002 i686
unknown

Here is my /etc/nsswitch.conf (abbreviated):

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files winbind
group:  files winbind

Here is my smb.conf:

[global]
 workgroup = vsionline
 server string = Samba %v -- TEST --
 security = domain
 password server = vsi-vsi-albany
 winbind uid = 1-2
 winbind gid = 1-2
 winbind separator = +
 winbind cache time = 10
 winbind enum users = Yes
 winbind enum groups = Yes

For reference, here is my /etc/pam.d/login:

[root@tux pam.d]# cat login
#%PAM-1.0
auth   required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
auth   sufficient   /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
auth   sufficient   /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass
auth   required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
auth   required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
accountsufficient   /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
accountrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
password   required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionoptional /lib/security/pam_console.so
[root@tux pam.d]#

Any assistance anyone can provide will be much appreciated!

-SP


===
 
   \/   // Sean Patrick Ingles
\  /   // Jr. Network Engineer
 \/   ___ // 
  \  /   // Vision Systems, Inc.
  __/   /   _/ 142 State Street
   Albany, NY 12207
www.visionsys.com   Landline: +1 518.434.4300 x1406
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax: +1 518.434.4304
 
==
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system

Re: [Samba] Samba limitations

2002-11-05 Thread Andrew Bartlett

On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 08:40, Rick Segeberg wrote:
 My company is seriously considering moving our existing NetWare 4.11
 file servers to Samba Linux servers (Red Hat 8).  Our current servers
 hold (on average) 400GB of data each (some much more) on various volumes
 (our largest volume at this time is 400GB).  Most of this space is used
 by multimedia files which are 1GB up to 4GB (yes, for a single file).
 We have about 200 users who have access to various directories across
 all of the servers, although we hope to consolidate that by making a
 separate server(s) for each major department.
 
 1) What kind of limitation (if any) does Samba have in being a file
 server?  By that I mean are there limitations on file sizes, volume
 sizes, number of files, number of users connected, performance issues,
 etc.  

Many of these are issues with the filesystem and Linux itself, rather
than Samba.  As such, using RedHat 8.0 is a good start - it gets you the
large file support etc.  (So 4GB should not be an issue).  Volume sizes
depend on the filesystem - I would suggest you get SGI's XFS enabled
kernel.

200 users isn't an issue, but you will want to use Samba 2.2.6 for
sendfile support.  (Increases performance, enable --with-sendfile. 
Enabled by default in 3.0).

If you have a lot of similarly names files, look into the 'mangling
method' smb.conf parameter - set to hash2 for better performance, (the
new default in 3.0).

 2) Has anyone found a good way to add space to an existing volume
 (something easy to do in NetWare) via RAID, stripping or whatever?  In
 other words, I will need to add space in the future by adding a hard
 drive and spanning an existing volume across that new hard drive.  I
 know I can do it via mount points, but that gets messy, and only adds
 space to the directory structure in which you mount the new drive,
 rather than to the entire volume.  We will be using RAID 5 (hardware
 based), but even after adding a drive to the array, you somehow have to
 expand the volume across the new space.

You will want to look into things like LVM, but I've not used this
myself.

 3) What are the gotchas on file system rights?  We do not have a PDC at
 this time, but when Samba 3.0 is final, would like to use our existing
 Windows 2000 AD domain (which is not actually used as a domain right
 now, but only for Exchange/Outlook functionality) to help manage those
 rights.

Samba 2.2 also supports integration into a Win2k domain, if you need
it.  The changes with 3.0 just make it use the native Win2k protocols
(with subsequent gains in efficiency, kerberos support etc).

The XFS kernel from SGI has ACL support, which can mirror most of the NT
ACL functionality.  There is a patch around for real NT ACLs if you
really want them.

 I would appreciate your feedback.  Samba is my file server at home, but
 that doesn't even compare to what we're looking at here.  Any advice,
 what not to do, etc. is welcome.

The big advise is to use the latest release, test, and find the areas
where it hurts.  Then come back and see what can be done about them.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Samba] Cannot access the COMMIT CHANGES tab in SWAT

2002-11-05 Thread John H Terpstra

On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Mr.George wrote:

 Dear Linux guru's

 I am a starter in redhat,i have a problem while configring SAMBA using
 SWAT.I'm not able to access the COMMIT CHANGES tab in swat which
 should be close to RESET VALUES and ADVANCED VIEW,to add further i
 dont even see the COMMIT CHNAGES tab on the screen anywhere,how am i
 supposed configure samba using swat.I would accept any
 recommendations.Pls do email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding your
 troubleshooting suggestions.

Might work better if you log on as root.

- John T.

-- 
John H Terpstra
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] INTERNAL ERROR in nmbd

2002-11-05 Thread Ury N . Stankevich

part of log.nmbd
--
standard_fail_register: Failed to register/refresh name GROVE1d on
subnet 10.103.102.1
[2002/11/06 00:01:17, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(38)
=== 
[2002/11/06 00:01:17, 0]lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)INTERNAL ERROR:
Signal 11 in pid 912 (2.2.6)Please read the file BUGS.txt in the
distribution
[2002/11/06 00:01:17, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)  
=== 
[2002/11/06 00:01:17, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: internal
error   

--
this occure after some random time after start, one day... one week...
samba configured as wins server and domain controller. if you wish - i
can attach config files.

__Ury
  
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Software Development $20-$25 USD per hour!

2002-11-05 Thread B2B

Dear IT Manager,

Have you ever thought of redesigning your website or creating an on-line
database, in short anything that has to do with software development; this
offer is right for you. Our highly skilled offshore programmers are
capable and ready to develop any of your e-commerce software dreams and
needs. 

We develop for ALL WINDOWS AND UNIX PLATFORMS
Auctions, Hosting Solutions, Shopping Carts, databases, networks, plus
Perl, PHP, C++, ASP, Cold Fusion, Java, Wap, XML, MS Access, SQL, etc.

From business analysis and consulting to web design, from coding to
testing we provide a full cycle of IT services.

Typical rates are $20-$25 per hour.

For more complete information about our company and services we provide
please visit http://www.smtprogramming.com 
I will be very glad to answer any of your questions ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Feel
free to contact us any time and all the estimates will be done for you
FREE of charge.

Thanks!

Paul Smirnov
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] problem reading and creating unicode filenames with Samba 3.0alpha20

2002-11-05 Thread Andrew Dibble

hey all,
i'm having a problem creating foreign-language filenames under Samba 3.0
alpha 20 (on stock redhat 7.3).  i would like to be able to open up the
share under win2k pro (english version), switch my language to Hebrew, and
type in a Hebrew filename.  when i do this, the file shows up as the hebrew
name until i refresh it, at which point the characters are replaced by
question marks.  (a ls in the directory on the linux box shows the same
thing - all 's)  this seems like a unicode issue -- it works fine with
another win2k smb server.  i thought samba 3.0 sent unicode over the wire by
default?  anyways, here is the global section of my smb.conf:

[global]
   security = share
   encrypt passwords = yes
   server string = samba3 (%v,%h)
   load printers = no
   log level = 5
   log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
   guest account = pcguest
   hosts allow = 10.0.0 192.168 localhost
   password level = 2
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY
   share modes = yes
   locking = yes
   strict locking = yes
   keepalive = 30
   unicode = yes
   unix charset = UTF8
   dos charset = UCS-2LE

i have also tried dos charset = UTF-8 and it did the same thing.. 

any ideas?

thanks,
-drew
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] ms dfs? What is it?

2002-11-05 Thread Matthew Hannigan

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0600, Michael Heironimus wrote:
 It's a distributed filesystem for Windows, allowing you to split the
 logical view of shares from the physical locations. You have one
 top-level DFS share that can be mounted by 95 and newer clients (as far
 [ ... ]

But I guess it uses the SMB protocol for the basics?

Matt
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] cross subnet browsing (win Xp problem)

2002-11-05 Thread Marian Mlcoch, Ing

Hi Daniel
Browsing on mixed subnets network cross routers is problem.
I dont undestand how is configured your leased line and routers but if your
Win98 clients on second network ok see first segment PCs then problem is
exatly in XP . You must set only tcpip protocol on XP and workgroup must be
some. And wins on XP must be set to samba IP.



- Original Message -
From: Daniellek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:31 PM
Subject: [Samba] cross subnet browsing (win Xp problem)


 I've got to networks connected through leased line, routing set between
 networks, WINS server running on Samba.

 There's one primary samba server, and Win98/WinXP clients connected to it.

 First network with samba server works great with win98 and winxp.

 Second network also works ok with win98 clients, but when I connect Winxp
 it can't even open my network places and show all computers on the
workgroup.
 (it dosen't show _any_ computers, just message to contact with
administrator
 of WORKGROUP :-)

 The same WinXP when connected directly to network with samba server works
OK.

 How can I make this WinXP in other office to see samba server/all
computers?

 --
 Daniel Fenert --== [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==--
 ==-P o w e r e d--b y--S l a c k w a r e-=-ICQ #37739641-==
 If you ask the wrong questions you get answers like '42' or 'God'.
 ===- http://daniel.fenert.net/ -=== +48604628083 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] How to start samba with linux 8.0

2002-11-05 Thread SW Kisters

Dear sirs,

How can I start automaticaly Samba with linux 8.0
not with rcsmb. So it starts automatically on booting
I read it on the internet pages some weeks ago but now 
I can't find it any more.

Thank you in advance.

Kind regards
SW Kisters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [SAMBA] Retaining ownership of files

2002-11-05 Thread Tommy . Fallsen

Title: RE: [SAMBA] Retaining ownership of files

-Original Message-
From: Yura Pismerov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 5. november 2002 15:59
To: Fallsen, Tommy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] Retaining ownership of files

chown -R group /path/to/the/share
chmod -R g+w /path/to/the/share group
find /path/to/the/share -type d -exec chmod g+s {} \;

In smb.conf you will need only 2 options:

create mode = 0664
directory mode = 0775

But all those 60+ developers should be in that group if they also have
direct (shell) access to the files. You also should change umask to 002
for their shells.

If you want to maintain different groups within the same share/directory
you can run the
same 3 commands I mentioned but replace share with particular
sub-directory name and group with particular group.
This setup will allow to maintain proper group ownership on OS level
(which takes precedence over Samba setup), so on the Samba level you
will only have to take care of the proper modes on the
files/directories.

I hope this helps.

I didn't notice this before, but I found a option inherit permissions, I assume this allows developers to create new dirs without worry about setting setgid on them? Using the settings you provided MS Word docs still would change owner, but not group. I don't see this as a problem, but I have to

Make sure the developers know this is how samba behave.

Tommy Fallsen

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi
I want users to edit each other files, but not having the ownership
changed at all I.e. user1 create a word doc, user2 can edit it, but
the ownership is not changed to user2.

force create mode
force directory mode
force user
force group

I know of these , but our share have tons of dirs with files that have
different users and groups, 60+ developers working together.

Are there any new options in 2.2.6 that can fix this?

thanks

~
Tommy Fallsen System Administrator
Kongsberg Defence Aerospace
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL: +47 32287783 MOB +47 93057326
WEB: http://www.kongsberg.com/eng/kog/

The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is
confidential and intended solely for the attention and use
of the named addressee(s). This information may be subject
to legal, professional or other privilege and further
distribution of it is strictly prohibited without our
authority. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or retain this message or any part of it, and should notify
us immediately.

RE: [samba] - servers keeps disapearing

2002-11-05 Thread Tommy . Fallsen

Title: RE: [samba] - servers keeps disapearing







 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Odenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 4. november 2002 09:29
 To: Fallsen, Tommy
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [samba] - servers keeps disapearing
 
 
 Hi,
 
  Is there a known problem with samba servers that keeps disappearing
  from network neighborhood? Had this problem with 2.2.3, have to
  restart nmbd to get them back on, but nmbd never stops.
 
 Yes - there _was_ a known problem with nmbd not reregistering names.
 Has disappeared since 2.2.5.
 
 Greetings,
 
 Christopher
 
 
 --
 ==
 Dipl.-Ing. Christopher Odenbach
 HNI Rechnerbetrieb
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tel.: +49 5251 60 6215
 ==



I run 2.2.5 on a server and nmbd shuts down after a few days.
Happends on earlier versions too.
Anyone else have this problem or does it only occur on Solaris?





Tommy Fallsen

Re: Fallout from the MS Anti-Trust decision.

2002-11-05 Thread Barry Dean

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 04 Nov 2002 6:49 pm, Richard Sharpe wrote:
 I suspect that MS has lots of problems on their hands. There is a steam
 roller of open source coming at them all over the world, and they have
 grown big and bloated and unable to move swiftly.

Not just open source, but reluctance from business to buy the latest Windows 
and Office products, reluctance from customers to upgrade constantly, 
complete failure of the XBox, losing out in the set-top-box market, not 
making any inroads into mobile phones. I am sure I could go on.

It's not just Open Source either. Don't forget that there are other 
technologies out there that can help in the fight against the Borg.. J2EE for 
instance is way better than .NOT.

 I say, lets just continue to make it easier for people to get off NT and
 onto Samba on UNIX :-)

I could not agree more. Active Directory is the biggest enemy here. As long 
as a site feels the need to base itself around AD, Windows desktops, Servers 
and closed proprietry software solutions will follow. This closes and bolts 
the door to better solutions.

- -- 

Barry Dean
Senior Computing Officer
Computing Service, University of Kent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9x5aX63PGDezn6TQRAs6IAJ9HKL2wzHmwYLJ+vu9gbb/Ev43C6ACg0uDE
1kIOdRf9HwjDB/pIgDqB2gM=
=Ramc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

net rpc vampire migration

2002-11-05 Thread Guillaume LACHENAL

I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
on my personal testing box (no hardware at work, it s a pity ...)

Just one question while my P200 is under heavy load :

does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?

this is the last missing feature for a complete -needed- migration
of our LAN.

We wan't to

1. 'clone' the NT-PDC info a Samba [3.0] PDC
2. shutdown the NT-PDC

without any modification (if possible) on domain members workstation

Does the vampire code (will) allow this ?

We can do testing / report and contribute to the release of 3.0 !

thx

G.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] :

 In the Roadmap to 3.0, we can see that this script need some testing 
 before release.
 
 As this kind of migration is the last issue with to cope with before 
 migration of our
 complete lan, I can contribute to testing !
 
 But I can't find this script in 3.0a20 nor via cvsweb (just a *quick* 
look 
 sorry)
 
 Is there anyone who
 * has tested the script
 * know where I can find it 
 ?

Volker Lendecke is responsible for this and it is known
as net rpc vampire in the HEAD branch.  Please
coordinate testing, reports, etc... on the samba-technical
list (since the feature is still under development). 

Thanks.

PLEASE HELP! samba2.2.6rc2cvs - solaris winbind pam - using user nobody instead of domain user

2002-11-05 Thread David Shapiro

Hello,

Used /usr/ccs/bin ld, as, make (solaris 8) and 2.95.3 20010315 (release)

I installed samba 2.2.6rc2cvs with

cd /usr/local/samba/source
env CFLAGS=-Wall -m32 -g ./configure \
--with-winbind \
--with-winbind-auth-challenge \
--with-acl-support \
--with-ssl \
--without-sendfile-support \
--with-included-popt \
--with-pam \
--with-smbwrapper

make  make install

ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.1
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.2
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.2
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so
/usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so

crle -l /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc -i /usr/j2se/lib/sparc -l /usr/lib -i
/usr/lib  -l /usr/local/lib -i /usr/local/lib -l /usr/local/ssl/lib -i
/usr/local/ssl/lib -i  /usr/lib/security -s /usr/lib/security -i
/usr/lib/secure -s /usr/lib/security

crle -64 -l /usr/lib/64 -i /usr/lib/64 -s /usr/lib/64/secure

pam.conf:

login   auth sufficient /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_winbind.so
login   auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
login   auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_dial_auth.so.1
#
rlogin  auth sufficient /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_rhosts_auth.so.1
rlogin  auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
dtlogin auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
rsh auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_rhosts_auth.so.1
other   auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
# Account management
#
login   account sufficient  /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_winbind.so
login   account requisite   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_roles.so.1
login   account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_projects.so.1
login   account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
dtlogin account requisite   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_roles.so.1
dtlogin account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_projects.so.1
dtlogin account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
other   account sufficient  /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_winbind.so
other   account requisite   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_roles.so.1
other   account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_projects.so.1


wbinfo -a INS+DavidSha%password (password was my password) returns:
plaintext password authentication succeeded

However, 
smbclient //optimus/samba-lib -UINS+DavidSha%password fails:
added interface ip=10.1.1.234 bcast=10.1.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Got a positive name query response from 10.1.4.11 ( 10.1.1.234 )
Domain=[INS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.6rc2cvs]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

log.optimus shows it tryint to log in with the user nobody:
er_in_list: checking user nobody in list INS+JamesF INS+DavidSha nobody
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(460)
  user_in_list: checking user |nobody| against |INS+JamesF|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(460)
  user_in_list: checking user |nobody| against |INS+DavidSha|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(460)
  user_in_list: checking user |nobody| against |nobody|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(466)
  user_in_list: user |nobody| matches |nobody|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(331)
  Invalid username/password for samba-lib [nobody]
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(110)
  error packet at smbd/reply.c(166) cmd=117 (SMBtconX)
NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

The smb.conf:
 Global parameters
[global]
coding system = 
client code page = 850
code page directory = /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages
workgroup = INS
netbios name = OPTIMUS
netbios aliases = 
netbios scope = 
server string = Samba %v on (%L)
interfaces = 10.1.1.234/24 127.0.0.1/24
bind interfaces only = Yes
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
update encrypted = No
allow trusted domains = Yes
hosts equiv = 
min passwd length = 5
map to guest = Never
null passwords = No
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = PDC,EXCHANGE_CORP
smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
root directory = 
pam password change = No
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd
passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed*
passwd chat debug = No
username map = 
password level = 0
username level = 0
unix password sync = No
restrict anonymous = No
lanman auth = Yes
use rhosts = No
admin log = No
log level = 10
syslog = 1
syslog only = No
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
max

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
 does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?

Yes, that is exactly the idea. To use it, make sure that all your scripts like

add machine script
add user script
add group script

etc are all set correct and working.

Hmmm. I need to write a HOWTO on this :-)

Volker



msg04272/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

PLEASE HELP! samba2.2.6rc2cvs - solaris winbind pam - using user nobody instead of domain user (additional info at top of this message)

2002-11-05 Thread David Shapiro

Sorry,

I forgot to mention that getent passwd and getent group do work (i.e.,
winbind answers).  Of course, the problem where large groups like Domain
Users do not return users or even mention of the existence of the group
still exists. 

-Original Message-
From: David Shapiro 
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:45 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: PLEASE HELP! samba2.2.6rc2cvs - solaris winbind pam - using
user nobody instead of domain user


Hello,

Used /usr/ccs/bin ld, as, make (solaris 8) and 2.95.3 20010315 (release)

I installed samba 2.2.6rc2cvs with

cd /usr/local/samba/source
env CFLAGS=-Wall -m32 -g ./configure \
--with-winbind \
--with-winbind-auth-challenge \
--with-acl-support \
--with-ssl \
--without-sendfile-support \
--with-included-popt \
--with-pam \
--with-smbwrapper

make  make install

ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.1
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.2
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so
/usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.2
ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so
/usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so

crle -l /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc -i /usr/j2se/lib/sparc -l /usr/lib -i
/usr/lib  -l /usr/local/lib -i /usr/local/lib -l /usr/local/ssl/lib -i
/usr/local/ssl/lib -i  /usr/lib/security -s /usr/lib/security -i
/usr/lib/secure -s /usr/lib/security

crle -64 -l /usr/lib/64 -i /usr/lib/64 -s /usr/lib/64/secure

pam.conf:

login   auth sufficient /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_winbind.so
login   auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
login   auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_dial_auth.so.1
#
rlogin  auth sufficient /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_rhosts_auth.so.1
rlogin  auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
dtlogin auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
rsh auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_rhosts_auth.so.1
other   auth required   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
# Account management
#
login   account sufficient  /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_winbind.so
login   account requisite   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_roles.so.1
login   account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_projects.so.1
login   account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
dtlogin account requisite   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_roles.so.1
dtlogin account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_projects.so.1
dtlogin account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so.1
#
other   account sufficient  /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_winbind.so
other   account requisite   /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_roles.so.1
other   account required/usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam_projects.so.1


wbinfo -a INS+DavidSha%password (password was my password) returns:
plaintext password authentication succeeded

However, 
smbclient //optimus/samba-lib -UINS+DavidSha%password fails:
added interface ip=10.1.1.234 bcast=10.1.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Got a positive name query response from 10.1.4.11 ( 10.1.1.234 )
Domain=[INS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.6rc2cvs]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

log.optimus shows it tryint to log in with the user nobody:
er_in_list: checking user nobody in list INS+JamesF INS+DavidSha nobody
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(460)
  user_in_list: checking user |nobody| against |INS+JamesF|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(460)
  user_in_list: checking user |nobody| against |INS+DavidSha|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(460)
  user_in_list: checking user |nobody| against |nobody|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(466)
  user_in_list: user |nobody| matches |nobody|
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(331)
  Invalid username/password for samba-lib [nobody]
[2002/11/05 09:39:24, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(110)
  error packet at smbd/reply.c(166) cmd=117 (SMBtconX)
NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

The smb.conf:
 Global parameters
[global]
coding system = 
client code page = 850
code page directory = /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages
workgroup = INS
netbios name = OPTIMUS
netbios aliases = 
netbios scope = 
server string = Samba %v on (%L)
interfaces = 10.1.1.234/24 127.0.0.1/24
bind interfaces only = Yes
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
update encrypted = No
allow trusted domains = Yes
hosts equiv = 
min passwd length = 5
map to guest = Never
null passwords = No
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = PDC,EXCHANGE_CORP
smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
root directory = 
pam password change = No
passwd program =

Re: net rpc vampire migration

2002-11-05 Thread Guillaume LACHENAL

as 3.0 is still in alpha state, do you think is there a way
to use 'net rpc vampire' from 3.0 on samba 2.2.6 ?

thanks





Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/05/02 15:53
Please respond to Volker.Lendecke

 
To: Guillaume LACHENAL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: net rpc vampire  migration


On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
 does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?

Yes, that is exactly the idea. To use it, make sure that all your scripts 
like

add machine script
add user script
add group script

etc are all set correct and working.

Hmmm. I need to write a HOWTO on this :-)

Volker





atte2x0n.dat
Description: Binary data

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
 as 3.0 is still in alpha state, do you think is there a way
 to use 'net rpc vampire' from 3.0 on samba 2.2.6 ?

No, not possible. That's really a 3.0 only feature.

Volker



msg04276/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

net rpc getsid

2002-11-05 Thread Guillaume LACHENAL

In case of a PDC migration, when doing
'net rpc getsid', what's about users/computers authentication
if two DC with the same SID are up on the network ?

smbfs missing files

2002-11-05 Thread Steven French

 I try to get a list of all of about 19,000 directories,
 and then in each of these, a few hundred files.
 It seems to just not see some of the directories and some
 of the files when it goes through.

Have you tried one of the other clients (jcifs or smbclient or the Linux
cifs vfs) to see if it can display those files?  Do any of the
filenames/patch components (that do not display) contain international
characters above 128 decimal?   Can the missing directory/file be displayed
individually (e.g. by stat filename or ls filename)?

Steve French
Senior Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin
phone: 512-838-2294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:

 I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
 on my personal testing box (no hardware at work, it s a pity ...)
 
 Just one question while my P200 is under heavy load :
 
 does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?

That is what it is for.

You might also be interested in the profiles tool I put up recently which 
seems to allow you to fix NTUSER.DAT so that it has the correct SIDs.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: smbfs missing files

2002-11-05 Thread Urban Widmark

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Jeff Ames wrote:

 This sounds like the same problem as the bug reports 21471, 21407, 21561,
 and 21694 discuss, but I couldn't find a solution anywhere.  I'm just

I guess I should update those...

 writing to add a data point, and also to ask whether there is any known
 fix or workaround for this at the time.  If this would be better submitted
 as a bug report instead of this list, please let me know.

There is a known problem with win2k listings. It doesn't like us using the
continue bit at all. You should be able to trigger this with smbclient
too.

Try this patch for 2.4.19
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.19-rc1-ALL.patch.gz

It changes smbfs to use the same method as win2k does when listing files
on another win2k machine (there is a lot of other stuff in there too,
including 2G files and unicode).

Note that there is a known report of this breaking listings vs NT4, which
is why the change hasn't been made in the official kernel yet.


I have been meaning to compare what win2k sends to and NT4 when listing
and see if it does anything differently from win2k-win2k. I guess it
could be a NT4/non-unicode-client issue.

/Urban

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:36:44AM -0800, Tim Potter wrote:
 If you can get net rpc vampire to spit out a smbpasswd file then
 that could be used with a Samba 2.2 environment.

For that pwdump is easier. The problem is 2.2 will kill your RID's.
That's the hole point of vampire in 3.0

Volker



msg04282/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: net rpc vampire migration

2002-11-05 Thread Simo Sorce

Richard, do you confirm NTUSER.DAT files works ok after that change?

Simo.

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:56, Richard Sharpe wrote:
 On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
 
  I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
  on my personal testing box (no hardware at work, it s a pity ...)
  
  Just one question while my P200 is under heavy load :
  
  does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?
 
 That is what it is for.
 
 You might also be interested in the profiles tool I put up recently which 
 seems to allow you to fix NTUSER.DAT so that it has the correct SIDs.
 
 Regards
 -
 Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com
-- 
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:

 Richard, do you confirm NTUSER.DAT files works ok after that change?

Seems to work for me. I changed my Server's name, rejoined, ran the 
program and changed both the OWNER and GROUP SID, and it seemed to work.

I want to try it again, but you could try it as well.
 
 Simo.
 
 On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:56, Richard Sharpe wrote:
  On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
  
   I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
   on my personal testing box (no hardware at work, it s a pity ...)
   
   Just one question while my P200 is under heavy load :
   
   does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?
  
  That is what it is for.
  
  You might also be interested in the profiles tool I put up recently which 
  seems to allow you to fix NTUSER.DAT so that it has the correct SIDs.
  
  Regards
  -
  Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com
 

-- 
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: smbfs missing files

2002-11-05 Thread Jeff Ames

 Have you tried one of the other clients (jcifs or smbclient or the Linux
 cifs vfs) to see if it can display those files?

Not yet.  Is there any way to do scripting in smbclient?  Something along
the lines of (in bash): (for ((i=0;i1000;++i)); do /bin/ls|wc
-l;done)|sort -n|uniq -c

 Do any of the filenames/patch components (that do not display) contain
 international characters above 128 decimal?

No.  I've had problems with, for example, directories of the form archN,
N=some number between 1 and 60, and with files of the form runN.ns,
N=number between 1 and 600.

 Can the missing directory/file be displayed individually (e.g. by stat
 filename or ls filename)?

No  It doesn't consistently miss a certain file.  It just seems to
randomly skip a few here and there.  If I just 'ls' a directory once,
everything has shown up so far.  If I run 'ls' 1000 times, I usually
get all the files.  But if I keep running 'ls' 1000 times, I eventually
get something like 910 listings with everything, and 90 listings missing 6
files.

It seems that when doing this 'ls' loop, the ones that miss files occur
together.  In a recent test, I got iterations 83 through 269 counting 4
fewer files than they should've, but all the rest were fine.  I got one
such segment that lasted about four seconds (123 iterations miscounted).
It seems that it doesn't last much longer than that, when it does occur.
It also seems highly likely that they're missing the same files, within
one of the segments, since they all show the same (wrong) number of files.

Jeff

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Volker Lendecke wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:36:44AM -0800, Tim Potter wrote:
  If you can get net rpc vampire to spit out a smbpasswd file then
  that could be used with a Samba 2.2 environment.
 
 For that pwdump is easier. The problem is 2.2 will kill your RID's.
 That's the hole point of vampire in 3.0

Hmmm, so what backend do you need to be using to preserve the RIDs?

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: net rpc vampire migration

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:18:55AM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
 Hmmm, so what backend do you need to be using to preserve the RIDs?

A 'rich' one, ie currently tdb or ldap, probably mysql as well.

Volker



msg04287/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Samba Help !!!

2002-11-05 Thread Rana Huq









Hi,



I am trying to use samba 2.2.6 (Under RedHat 7.3) to replace
a NT file server.

But I would like to have the folder and file security as
offered by NT.



I also like to validate the domain users via NT 4.0 SP6a
domain.

I am having hard time making it work.



Please help.



My smb.conf
file looks like this.



[global]



 workgroup = AMSIDOMN

 netbios name = ISLINUX

; allow trusted domains = yes

; nt acl support =
yes 

 server string = Test Server
%v



 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m

 max log size = 50

 security = domain 

 password server = *

 encrypt passwords = yes

 smb passwd file =
/etc/samba/smbpasswd

 socket options = TCP_NODELAY
SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192

 dns proxy = no 

 large readwrite = Yes

 



# Share
Definitions ==

[data]

 comment = Data Folder

 path = /usr/data

 read only = no

 create mask = 0765

 directory mask = 0777

 delete readonly = yes

 writable = yes

 



Samba server joined the NT domain successfully.

I can view the samba server and the data folder but it still
asks me for user name and password when I am trying to access the data folder.

I would like to maintain the user name and password only on
NT domain controller.



Also I would like to optimize this samba server for
Microsoft network.



I am not sure what I am doing wrong. 



Forgive me, I am a new user as far as samba and Linux goes.



Thanks in advance,



Rana Huq

Re: samba-technical -- confirmation of subscription -- request 315311

2002-11-05 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels

On Tue, 05 Nov 2002 21:03:12 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 samba-technical -- confirmation of subscription -- request 315311
 
 We have received a request from 213.166.48.35 for subscription of your
 email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to the
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.  To confirm the request,
 please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 either:
 
 - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional Re: is
 ok),
 
 - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the
 message body: 
 
 confirm 315311
 
 (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email
 interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right
 form.)
 
 If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard
 this message.  Send questions to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
Stefaan
-- 
One man alone can be pretty dumb sometimes, but for real bona fide
stupidity there ain't nothing can beat teamwork. -- Mark Twain

recent python changes

2002-11-05 Thread Guenther Deschner

hi,

a very small fix for the Makefile...

bye,
guenther
-- 
Guenther Deschner  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux AGGnuPG: 8EE11688
Berliner Str. 27  phone:  +49 (0) 30 / 430944778
D-13507 Berlin   fax:  +49 (0) 30 / 43732804

--- Makefile.in 2002-11-05 22:28:04.0 +0100
+++ Makefile.in 2002-11-05 22:28:08.0 +0100
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@
echo Use the option --with-python to configure python; \
exit 1; fi
PYTHON_OBJS=$(PYTHON_OBJS) PYTHON_CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FLAGS) \
-x1 LIBS=$(LIBS) \
+   LIBS=$(LIBS) \
$(PYTHON) python/setup.py build
 
 python_install: $(PYTHON_OBJS)



msg04293/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: recent python changes

2002-11-05 Thread Tim Potter

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Guenther Deschner wrote:

 a very small fix for the Makefile...

 -x1   LIBS=$(LIBS) \
 + LIBS=$(LIBS) \

Thanks - you can tell I'm an emacs user and that my control key
doesn't work very well.  (-:


Tim.

Problems with map hidden (and possibly map system)

2002-11-05 Thread Glen Gibb

Hi all,

I encountered a problem with map hidden a week or two ago and posted a
patch to fix the problem. However, it appears that it slipped under radar
as I didn't receive any comments (either positive or negative). So I'm
reposting the information, hopefully with a clearer explanation.

Summary:

The problem arrises on shares with map hidden enabled when an NTCreate
message is sent and the file already exists, but the NTCreate specifies
the opposite value for hidden as the current file.

Detailed description:
=
I came across this problem when I enabled map hidden on a profiles share.
When copying hidden files to the profiles share, XP does the following:

1. An NTCreate message is sent to the server with the hidden bit NOT set,
with the file name set to a temporary file.
2. The NTCreate succeeds, and the appropriate message is returned to the
client.
3. The client sends a close message to the server, and the file is closed.
4. The client then sends another NTCreate message to the server, passing
in the same file name, but with the the hidden bit SET. (The server is
instructed to truncate the file if it already exists).

Step 4 fails on the samba server because the existing file has a different
set of attributes to that requested. In open_file_shared1 in smbd/open.c,
there is  a check performed when the file already exists to compare the
attributes, and this test is failing.

I've attached a patch that attempts to change the attributes on an
NTCreate when the TRUNCate flag is set, and only if the attribute change
fails does the NTCreate fail.

I'm using the patch in a 2.2.6 system without any problems. I haven't
tested this in 3, but the code is identical in smbd/open.c in the relevant
section.

Can someone have a look at the attached patch (against 2.2.6) to check if
it is the correct solution. If there are any problems please let me know.

BTW, if anyone would like a look, I can send a packet dump that shows XP
doing the above sequence of steps.

Looking forward to receiving feedback.

Thanks
Glen Gibb
Ridley College

PS. Is there an ideal format for sending in bug reports/patches?

--- open.c.orig Sat Oct 26 21:14:11 2002
+++ open.c  Sat Oct 26 21:14:21 2002
 -822,11 +822,13 
/* We only care about matching attributes on file exists and truncate. */
if (file_existed  (GET_FILE_OPEN_DISPOSITION(ofun) == FILE_EXISTS_TRUNCATE)) 
{
if (!open_match_attributes(conn, fname, psbuf-st_mode, mode)) {
-   DEBUG(5,(open_file_shared: attributes missmatch for file %s 
(0%o, 0%o)\n,
-   fname, psbuf-st_mode, mode ));
-   file_free(fsp);
-   errno = EACCES;
-   return NULL;
+   if (vfs_chmod(conn,fname,mode) != 0) {
+   DEBUG(5,(open_file_shared: attributes missmatch for 
+file %s (0%o, 0%o)\n,
+   fname, psbuf-st_mode, mode 
+));
+   file_free(fsp);
+   errno = EACCES;
+   return NULL;
+   }
}
}

Re: Problems with map hidden (and possibly map system)

2002-11-05 Thread jra

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:25:50AM +1100, Glen Gibb wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I encountered a problem with map hidden a week or two ago and posted a
 patch to fix the problem. However, it appears that it slipped under radar
 as I didn't receive any comments (either positive or negative). So I'm
 reposting the information, hopefully with a clearer explanation.
 
 Summary:
 
 The problem arrises on shares with map hidden enabled when an NTCreate
 message is sent and the file already exists, but the NTCreate specifies
 the opposite value for hidden as the current file.
 
 Detailed description:
 =
 I came across this problem when I enabled map hidden on a profiles share.
 When copying hidden files to the profiles share, XP does the following:
 
 1. An NTCreate message is sent to the server with the hidden bit NOT set,
 with the file name set to a temporary file.
 2. The NTCreate succeeds, and the appropriate message is returned to the
 client.
 3. The client sends a close message to the server, and the file is closed.
 4. The client then sends another NTCreate message to the server, passing
 in the same file name, but with the the hidden bit SET. (The server is
 instructed to truncate the file if it already exists).
 
 Step 4 fails on the samba server because the existing file has a different
 set of attributes to that requested. In open_file_shared1 in smbd/open.c,
 there is  a check performed when the file already exists to compare the
 attributes, and this test is failing.

Have you tested this against a Windows 2000 or XP server ? What is
the behavior there ?

Jeremy.

Re: Problems with map hidden (and possibly map system)

2002-11-05 Thread Glen Gibb

 Have you tested this against a Windows 2000 or XP server ? What is
 the behavior there ?


No, sorry. I don't have access to a 2k/XP server (at least not for at
a month or so).

Glen

Re: Problems with map hidden (and possibly map system)

2002-11-05 Thread Glen Gibb

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Glen Gibb wrote:

  Have you tested this against a Windows 2000 or XP server ? What is
  the behavior there ?
 

 No, sorry. I don't have access to a 2k/XP server (at least not for at
 a month or so).


I've done a little more testing (between a Win2K and an NT4 server at a
site that I don't manage), and I can cofirm that this is a Samba only
problem.


New Test Case:
==

1. Create a file on a local drive
2. Copy the file to the server (eg. by dragging).
3. Change the hidden attribute of the local file
4. Copy file to server
5. A message will appear asking if you want to replace the file. Say yes


Copying from 2k to NT works fine.
Copying from 2k to Samba with map hidden = no works fine
Copying from 2k to Samba with map hidden = yes FAILS (ps. make sure the
create mask doesn't clear the world execute bit).


Hope this helps.
Glen

Issue with Samba CVS HEAD configure on Solaris

2002-11-05 Thread Kris Van Hees

I ran into an issue running the configure script on a Solaris box with the
Sun C compiler (Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3 Patch 111679-08 2002/05/09).
Here is what happens (when trying to get a shared library):

The problem is apparantly that the SUNWspro C compiler does not allow the
output file of a compilation to have an arbitrary extension (.po in this case).
With GCC it works perfectly.

During the configure execution, the following message is displayed:

--- START
checking ability to build shared libraries... true
checking linker flags for shared libraries... -G ${CFLAGS}
checking compiler flags for position-independent code... 
checking whether building shared libraries actually works... cc: illegal suffix
of output filename
no
--- END

The commands that are executed during the test whether building shared
libraries actually works are:

--- START
install location/SUNWspro/bin/cc -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O -g 
-KPIC -c -o shlib.po ./tests/shlib.c
install location/SUNWspro/6.2.0p7/exec/SUNWspro/bin/cc -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O -g -G -O -g -o shlib.so shlib.po
--- END

Has anyone else ran into this problem, and is this just an option I overlooked
or is the indeed an issue where configuring and compiling Samba CVS HEAD is not
at all possible with the Sun Workshop C compiler because of the above problem?
I guess it would be possible to simply rewrite the logic for handling shared
libraries to work around this silly issue?

Kris

Re: WindowsXP Pro. can't acccess to SAMBA act as PDC!!

2002-11-05 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 22:09, werachat sittiparsong wrote:
 
this is not samba support
this is samba-technical (for technical discussion about samba internals)
this message belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Dear Samba support
 
 so i've provided Samba act as PDC for Domain logon from Windows98SE clients for 
logon to that domian,itz work ass well  but for my problem with WindowXP Pro. can't 
logon through SAMBA act as PDC.

this is probably the signorseal problem
you need to apply the reg file to your xp clients.

google for signorseal for more info

brad

samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

Hi,

I have been tracking down a problem with profiles that was reported last 
year to do with names like '31/2 Floppy (A).lnk' where 1/2 is the special 
character that shows up as 1/2 under Windows.

This problem does not occur with Linux and Samba 2.0.7, and does not occur 
with Samba-head and Slowaris or FreeBSD, however, it does it occur with 
Linux (RedHat 7.2) and samba-head.

The problem occurs when server_push is called to transfer the name to the 
response as a UNICODE string. However, while the string is fully in the 
buffer, for some reason, there is a 0x00 0x00 right after the 0x33 0x00 
inserted for the 3.

Now investigating why server_push is screwing the string up.
 
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

»ý»ýÇÑ ÈÁú·Î Æ÷¸£³ë»çÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¼Ò°³ÇØµå¸³´Ï´Ù

2002-11-05 Thread ½â½Ã¿ì¸Õ









°íÇ°°Ý Æ÷¸£³ë»çÀÌÆ® ¶±°ÉÀ» ¼Ò°³ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
  




»ý»ýÇÑ ÈÁú·Î ¼ºÀÎ»çÀÌÆ®¸¦
¿©·¯ºÐ¿¡°Ô
¼Ò°³ÇØµå¸³´Ï´Ù.

 




º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ×¿¡ ÀÇ°Å
Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ
¹öÆ°À» Å¬¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÃ³¸®°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áý´Ï´Ù.

Re: samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

2002-11-05 Thread jra

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:34:28PM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have been tracking down a problem with profiles that was reported last 
 year to do with names like '31/2 Floppy (A).lnk' where 1/2 is the special 
 character that shows up as 1/2 under Windows.
 
 This problem does not occur with Linux and Samba 2.0.7, and does not occur 
 with Samba-head and Slowaris or FreeBSD, however, it does it occur with 
 Linux (RedHat 7.2) and samba-head.
 
 The problem occurs when server_push is called to transfer the name to the 
 response as a UNICODE string. However, while the string is fully in the 
 buffer, for some reason, there is a 0x00 0x00 right after the 0x33 0x00 
 inserted for the 3.
 
 Now investigating why server_push is screwing the string up.

Oh. Do you have the unix character set set to iso8859-1 ? I
don't think that character set has a 1/2 character. Try
setting it to utf8 and see if this fixes it.

Jeremy.

Re: samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:34:28PM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I have been tracking down a problem with profiles that was reported last 
  year to do with names like '31/2 Floppy (A).lnk' where 1/2 is the special 
  character that shows up as 1/2 under Windows.
  
  This problem does not occur with Linux and Samba 2.0.7, and does not occur 
  with Samba-head and Slowaris or FreeBSD, however, it does it occur with 
  Linux (RedHat 7.2) and samba-head.
  
  The problem occurs when server_push is called to transfer the name to the 
  response as a UNICODE string. However, while the string is fully in the 
  buffer, for some reason, there is a 0x00 0x00 right after the 0x33 0x00 
  inserted for the 3.
  
  Now investigating why server_push is screwing the string up.
 
 Oh. Do you have the unix character set set to iso8859-1 ? I
 don't think that character set has a 1/2 character. Try
 setting it to utf8 and see if this fixes it.

I probably do. What is the default? I have not explicitely set it either 
under FreeBSD, Slowaris, nor Linux.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:34:28PM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I have been tracking down a problem with profiles that was reported last 
  year to do with names like '31/2 Floppy (A).lnk' where 1/2 is the special 
  character that shows up as 1/2 under Windows.
  
  This problem does not occur with Linux and Samba 2.0.7, and does not occur 
  with Samba-head and Slowaris or FreeBSD, however, it does it occur with 
  Linux (RedHat 7.2) and samba-head.
  
  The problem occurs when server_push is called to transfer the name to the 
  response as a UNICODE string. However, while the string is fully in the 
  buffer, for some reason, there is a 0x00 0x00 right after the 0x33 0x00 
  inserted for the 3.
  
  Now investigating why server_push is screwing the string up.
 
 Oh. Do you have the unix character set set to iso8859-1 ? I
 don't think that character set has a 1/2 character. Try
 setting it to utf8 and see if this fixes it.

Actually, when I display the file name under FreeBSD or Linux, it shows up 
as the  chevron ligature thingy.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:

 On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I probably do. What is the default? I have not explicitely set it either 
 under FreeBSD, Slowaris, nor Linux.

OK, the char in question is showing up as 0xAB, and is being converted to 
0x00 0x00 by smb_iconv!

This is only happening under Linux.

Now investigating why.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh. Do you have the unix character set set to iso8859-1 ? I
 don't think that character set has a 1/2 character. Try
 setting it to utf8 and see if this fixes it.

Hmmm, Under FreeBSD, that character is encoded as 0xC2 0xBD while under 
Linux it is encoded as 0xAB ...

So, I think it might be a failure to do with the creation of the file in 
the first place ...

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

Re: samba-head bug relating to windows special chars (1/2)

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:

 On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Oh. Do you have the unix character set set to iso8859-1 ? I
  don't think that character set has a 1/2 character. Try
  setting it to utf8 and see if this fixes it.
 
 Hmmm, Under FreeBSD, that character is encoded as 0xC2 0xBD while under 
 Linux it is encoded as 0xAB ...
 
 So, I think it might be a failure to do with the creation of the file in 
 the first place ...

OK, I have confirmed that. I copied the file from FreeBSD to Linux, and 
Samba displayed it correctly under Win2K.

This looks more like a file creation problem.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com

CVS update: samba/docs/htmldocs


Date:   Tue Nov  5 16:22:34 2002
Author: jelmer

Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/htmldocs
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28058/htmldocs

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_2_2
smb.conf.5.html 
Log Message:

The default of 'announce version' is 4.9, not 4.5


Revisions:
smb.conf.5.html 1.15.2.80 = 1.15.2.81

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smb.conf.5.html?r1=1.15.2.80r2=1.15.2.81

CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/manpages


Date:   Tue Nov  5 16:26:19 2002
Author: jelmer

Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/manpages
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28923/docs/docbook/manpages

Modified Files:
smb.conf.5.sgml 
Log Message:

The default for 'announce version' is 4.9, not 4.5 or 4.2


Revisions:
smb.conf.5.sgml 1.61 = 1.62

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml?r1=1.61r2=1.62

CVS update: samba/source


Date:   Tue Nov  5 16:36:38 2002
Author: jelmer

Update of /home/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32080

Modified Files:
configure 
Log Message:

Rerun autoconf


Revisions:
configure   1.340 = 1.341
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/configure?r1=1.340r2=1.341

CVS update: sambaweb

2002-11-05 Thread mbp


Date:   Wed Nov  6 03:46:56 2002
Author: mbp

Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1466

Modified Files:
download.html 
Log Message:
Patch from Noel Koethe:

2 link corrections and made the source html a bit more readable.


Revisions:
download.html   1.11 = 1.12
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/sambaweb/download.html?r1=1.11r2=1.12

CVS update: sambaweb

2002-11-05 Thread mbp


Date:   Wed Nov  6 03:47:42 2002
Author: mbp

Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1629

Modified Files:
contacts.html 
Log Message:
Patch from Noel Koethe:

a small fix and the Openproject IRC network has renamed itself to
freenode


Revisions:
contacts.html   1.1 = 1.2
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/sambaweb/contacts.html?r1=1.1r2=1.2

CVS update: samba/examples/pdb/mysql