Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:25:23 -0500 Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to my customer site tonight and if they don't see any issues when the get back to work on Tuesday, I'll declare this fixed by Wednesday. It took me a few extra days to declare it fixed, but one of our unhappiest users just reported that he hasn't had any problems all week long! Thanks again, Jeremy! Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpKcTrM2cj2k.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:54:58 -0700 Ok, I've fixed up the smbldap_search code and added a max sleep replication time of 5 seconds. I've committed to 3.0 svn if you want to try it. This should fix the issue you've reported here. Let me know if not Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to my customer site tonight and if they don't see any issues when the get back to work on Tuesday, I'll declare this fixed by Wednesday. Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the beer that I owe you. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpEXmfGfG8ir.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:25:23PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:54:58 -0700 Ok, I've fixed up the smbldap_search code and added a max sleep replication time of 5 seconds. I've committed to 3.0 svn if you want to try it. This should fix the issue you've reported here. Let me know if not Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to my customer site tonight and if they don't see any issues when the get back to work on Tuesday, I'll declare this fixed by Wednesday. Cool ! Thanks a *lot*. I was really hoping it wasn't the new deferred open code :-). Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the beer that I owe you. I might just take you up on that. :-). Cheers, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:34:17 -0700 Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the beer that I owe you. I might just take you up on that. :-). That's one of the beauties of open source software. If I found a bug in commercial software, I don't think I could pay for the fix by promising to buy someone a beer at an uncertain date in the future. Besides, who wants to drink a beer with Bill Gates? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpyX05EhYgir.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:05:18AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:54:53 -0500 (I'm still trying to get a new debug log for you.) Sorry this took a while, but unfortunately I have other responsibilities. New log at http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblog The delay was from 10:09:52 to 10:11:17. At last ! Thanks ! The problem is here : 249646 [2004/07/01 10:09:52, 5] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search(932) 249647 smbldap_search: base = [dc=trinsics,dc=com], filter = [((sambaSID=S-1-5-21-904170827-898255731-2295272421-1407)( objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope = [2] 249648 [2004/07/01 10:09:52, 5] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search(950) 249649 smbldap_search: waiting 1117501 milliseconds for LDAP replication. 249650 [2004/07/01 10:11:17, 6] param/loadparm.c:lp_file_list_changed(2687) 249651 lp_file_list_changed() 249652 file /etc/samba3/smb.conf - /etc/samba3/smb.conf last mod_time: Wed Jun 30 16:11:03 2004 249653 249654 [2004/07/01 10:11:17, 5] smbd/connection.c:claim_connection(170) 249655 claiming 0 249656 [2004/07/01 10:11:17, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) 249657 getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Nothing to do with the new open code. There is a bug (not sure what yet) with calculating the sleep time in smbldap_search() (in fact I have *NO* idea what this code is for) that causes it to sleep for much more than 30 second - client times out, fun ensues Jerry, you might want to look at this. I'll fix this asap ! THANKS ! Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:05:18AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:54:53 -0500 (I'm still trying to get a new debug log for you.) Sorry this took a while, but unfortunately I have other responsibilities. New log at http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblog The delay was from 10:09:52 to 10:11:17. At last ! Thanks ! The problem is here : 249646 [2004/07/01 10:09:52, 5] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search(932) 249647 smbldap_search: base = [dc=trinsics,dc=com], filter = [((sambaSID=S-1-5-21-904170827-898255731-2295272421-1407)( objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope = [2] 249648 [2004/07/01 10:09:52, 5] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search(950) 249649 smbldap_search: waiting 1117501 milliseconds for LDAP replication. 249650 [2004/07/01 10:11:17, 6] param/loadparm.c:lp_file_list_changed(2687) 249651 lp_file_list_changed() 249652 file /etc/samba3/smb.conf - /etc/samba3/smb.conf last mod_time: Wed Jun 30 16:11:03 2004 249653 249654 [2004/07/01 10:11:17, 5] smbd/connection.c:claim_connection(170) 249655 claiming 0 249656 [2004/07/01 10:11:17, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) 249657 getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Nothing to do with the new open code. There is a bug (not sure what yet) with calculating the sleep time in smbldap_search() (in fact I have *NO* idea what this code is for) that causes it to sleep for much more than 30 second - client times out, fun ensues Ok, I've fixed up the smbldap_search code and added a max sleep replication time of 5 seconds. I've committed to 3.0 svn if you want to try it. This should fix the issue you've reported here. Let me know if not Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:27:31 -0700 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me th e error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporar y file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Ok, while I'm looking at the code, here's something that Andreas Haumer sent me about a related problem. But we did another test and we now know it has something to do with the version of MS Office: the error only occurs with (old) Excel from Office97, it does not occur with Excel from Office2003! I can't explain what is going on here, but maybe that's a hint for others having the same problem I was wondering what Excel version you're using ? I'm using Excel 2000, but we've also seen it with Excel 2003. Sorry. (I'm still trying to get a new debug log for you.) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpy8AWzd4Y0n.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 Logging was not at level 10, so this is what I got (the hang was between 14:56:36 and 14:57:54), so I think there's nothing useful in here. [2004/06/29 14:56:36, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service cwg initially as user cwg (uid=200, gid=203) (pid 24074) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service cwg initially as user cwg (uid=200, gid=203) (pid 23708) [2004/06/29 15:00:46, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) Do you want another debug level 10 report? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpdCs8LMJY4M.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 Logging was not at level 10, so this is what I got (the hang was between 14:56:36 and 14:57:54), so I think there's nothing useful in here. Nope, nothing there... Arh ! This is driving me nuts ! I can't reproduce it :-). A debug level 10 would be very helpful, as it's the same pid that is listed in all the (conflicting) deny modes. Which should be impossible, I just thought I'd mention that :-). I'm going to look at that code again. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 The strange thing is the Oplock value of none here Are you sure you have kernel oplocks set to no ? Use testparm to be sure and ensure you've restarted smbd or it won't take effect. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:47:34 -0700 The strange thing is the Oplock value of none here Are you sure you have kernel oplocks set to no ? Use testparm to be sure and ensure you've restarted smbd or it won't take effect. hmmm. what does this mean: Load smb config files from /etc/samba3/smb.conf Processing section [homes] Processing section [netlogon] Processing section [profiles] Processing section [groups] Processing section [InterChk] Processing section [local-soft] Processing section [pointmeridian] Processing section [print$] Processing section [software] Processing section [lp1] Loaded services file OK. WARNING: You have some share names that are longer than 12 characters. These may not be accessible to some older clients. (Eg. Windows9x, WindowsMe, and smbclient prior to Samba 3.0.) Invalid combination of parameters for service netlogon.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service profiles.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service groups. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service InterChk.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service local-soft. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service pointmeridian. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service print$. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service lp1. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] workgroup = TRINSICS interfaces = eth0, 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = Yes map to guest = Bad User smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 log level = 10 log file = /var/log/samba3/%m.log max log size = 2500 min protocol = NT1 deadtime = 1440 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE load printers = No add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g users -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = login.bat logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U logon drive = U: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 127 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes kernel oplocks = No ldap suffix = dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap machine suffix = ou=people,dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap user suffix = ou=people,dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=group,dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap admin dn = cn=wheel,o=trinsics,c=us ldap passwd sync = Yes min print space = 32768 delete veto files = Yes oplocks = No [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No veto files = /.?*/.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/Maildir/ browseable = No oplocks = Yes [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = Yes [profiles] path = /home/samba/ntprofile read only = No create mask = 0600 force create mode = 0600 directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0700 profile acls = Yes csc policy = disable [groups] comment = Group Shares path = /export/groups write list = @users force group = +users read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0770 map acl inherit = Yes veto files = /.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/ [InterChk] comment = Sophos InterCheck Share path = /export/intercheck read only = No map acl inherit = Yes [local-soft] comment = Local Software (not backed up) path = /export/local-soft write list = @users force group = +users read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0770 map acl inherit = Yes veto files = /.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/ [pointmeridian] comment = Point Meridian path = /export/pointmeridian read only = No map acl
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:16:24PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:47:34 -0700 The strange thing is the Oplock value of none here Are you sure you have kernel oplocks set to no ? Use testparm to be sure and ensure you've restarted smbd or it won't take effect. hmmm. what does this mean: Load smb config files from /etc/samba3/smb.conf Processing section [homes] Processing section [netlogon] Processing section [profiles] Processing section [groups] Processing section [InterChk] Processing section [local-soft] Processing section [pointmeridian] Processing section [print$] Processing section [software] Processing section [lp1] Loaded services file OK. WARNING: You have some share names that are longer than 12 characters. These may not be accessible to some older clients. (Eg. Windows9x, WindowsMe, and smbclient prior to Samba 3.0.) Invalid combination of parameters for service netlogon.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service profiles.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service groups. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service InterChk.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service local-soft. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service pointmeridian. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service print$. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service lp1. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions It just means whenever you turn oplocks off and don't turn off level 2 oplocks you've got an invalid combo. Doesn't hurt. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Ok, while I'm looking at the code, here's something that Andreas Haumer sent me about a related problem. But we did another test and we now know it has something to do with the version of MS Office: the error only occurs with (old) Excel from Office97, it does not occur with Excel from Office2003! I can't explain what is going on here, but maybe that's a hint for others having the same problem I was wondering what Excel version you're using ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700 Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to control the action of the defer open code. It's called defer sharing violations and it's set to yes by default (to emulate Windows correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing if the problem goes away. Thanks! I hope I can get to this in the next few days. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgprWPXPa3BBV.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700 Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to control the action of the defer open code. It's called defer sharing violations and it's set to yes by default (to emulate Windows correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing if the problem goes away. I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes. I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works there. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp92Bt5uS0CU.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:01:55 -0500 I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes. I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works there. It just failed differently. Now after I tell it to go ahead and overwrite, it hangs before trying to write the file and when it finally comes back it says: 'U:\bbu projection.xls' cannot be accessed. The file may be read-only, or you may be trying to access a read-only location. Or, the server the file is stored on may not be responding. What a terribly written error message...not to mention that I can't believe they can't tell the difference between a read-only file and the server not responding. I had logging back down to 1 and this appeared in the log: [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service groups initially as user cwg (uid=200 , gid=100) (pid 731) [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service groups initially as user cwg (uid=200 , gid=100) (pid 731) [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(830) oplock_break: end of file from client oplock_break failed for file bbu projection.xls (dev = 809, inode = 1570136, file_id = 23). [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(923) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service cwg Chris P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpfnOVureQLr.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:55AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700 Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to control the action of the defer open code. It's called defer sharing violations and it's set to yes by default (to emulate Windows correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing if the problem goes away. I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes. I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works there. Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:55AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:01:55 -0500 I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes. I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works there. It just failed differently. Now after I tell it to go ahead and overwrite, it hangs before trying to write the file and when it finally comes back it says: 'U:\bbu projection.xls' cannot be accessed. The file may be read-only, or you may be trying to access a read-only location. Or, the server the file is stored on may not be responding. What a terribly written error message...not to mention that I can't believe they can't tell the difference between a read-only file and the server not responding. I had logging back down to 1 and this appeared in the log: [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service groups initially as user cwg (uid=200 , gid=100) (pid 731) [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service groups initially as user cwg (uid=200 , gid=100) (pid 731) [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(830) oplock_break: end of file from client oplock_break failed for file bbu projection.xls (dev = 809, inode = 1570136, file_id = 23). [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(923) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service cwg Chris P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? Yes, it will. Are you sure you're running the SVN code. I did fix a bug recently (friday I think) that would cause a client to get a double return from a rename which might have caused that. Unless it's that, it doesn't look like a deferred open problem. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:23 -0700 P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? Yes, it will. Are you sure you're running the SVN code. I did fix a bug recently (friday I think) that would cause a client to get a double return from a rename which might have caused that. Unless it's that, it doesn't look like a deferred open problem. My customer is running a week-old SVN, I'm running one from this morning. Sounds like I should put this morning's SVN on their machine and leave oplocks off. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpdU3iE09nJG.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:18:39PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:23 -0700 P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? Yes, it will. Are you sure you're running the SVN code. I did fix a bug recently (friday I think) that would cause a client to get a double return from a rename which might have caused that. Unless it's that, it doesn't look like a deferred open problem. My customer is running a week-old SVN, I'm running one from this morning. Sounds like I should put this morning's SVN on their machine and leave oplocks off. Yes, todays svn is significantly better than 1 week old. I'll be doing lots of Q/A on it this week in preparation for 3.0.5pre2. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:20:40 -0700 I can't reproduce this :-(. I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpqKsOz2ZSXu.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500 I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail I just had exactly the same thing happen again. Since it was identical, I'm not going to post the log. However, this time I ran smbstatus while it was hung and noticed two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 2106 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/EC94B140 Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 2106 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/EC94B140 Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 2106 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 In fact, I see that there are still two locks even after excel let me work again. I hope this is all useful, Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpiPXtyh2PsO.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:25:29AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500 I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail I just had exactly the same thing happen again. Since it was identical, I'm not going to post the log. However, this time I ran smbstatus while it was hung and noticed two locks on the temporary file: Ok, I've found a logic error in the deferred open code w.r.t. renames. I'll email when I've fixed it in SVN. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:25:29AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500 I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail I just had exactly the same thing happen again. Since it was identical, I'm not going to post the log. However, this time I ran smbstatus while it was hung and noticed two locks on the temporary file: Ok, can you check out the current SVN and tell me if you can still reproduce it ? I just fixed a missing deferred open bug which would allow two copies of the same open to be reprocessed simultaneously (and send 2 replies !) in the NTrename case. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:25:29AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500 I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail I just had exactly the same thing happen again. Since it was identical, I'm not going to post the log. However, this time I ran smbstatus while it was hung and noticed two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 2106 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/EC94B140 Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 2106 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/EC94B140 Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 2106 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 In fact, I see that there are still two locks even after excel let me work again. Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to control the action of the defer open code. It's called defer sharing violations and it's set to yes by default (to emulate Windows correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing if the problem goes away. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base=ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com scope=2 filter=((objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(gidNumber=99)) where group 99 is the nobody group. I'm assuming as a result that this error is a red herring. I really need some guidance here. I've got some pretty frustrated users who don't even want to tell me when they're having problems any more. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpu11R9tAzPJ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:04:37 -0500 From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base=ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com scope=2 filter=((objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(gidNumber=99)) where group 99 is the nobody group. I'm assuming as a result that this error is a red herring. I really need some guidance here. I've got some pretty frustrated users who don't even want to tell me when they're having problems any more. ~sigh~ It looks like my second message got posted to the list, but not my first (probably because I included the original user complaint as an attachment), so I'm going to restate it differently. I'm now running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1202 which I built this weekend. It solved some of the issues we've been seeing, but we're still getting reports of delays while trying to open files of over a minute. The message I originally forwarded mentioned twice this morning. Here's the server log for that user with the above mentioned LDAP search failures removed since they appear to be unrelated (they happen much more often than the problem and nobody complains when they do happen): [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1400) failed to decode PDU [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/06/24 07:38:14, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service profiles initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 30493) [2004/06/24 07:38:31, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) product1 (10.2.240.173) closed connection to service profiles [2004/06/24 07:38:32, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service netlogon initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 30493) [2004/06/24 07:38:34, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service bjames initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 30493) [2004/06/24 07:40:00, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) product1 (10.2.240.173) closed connection to service netlogon [2004/06/24 08:24:41, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service bjames initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 20578) [2004/06/24 08:50:08, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) product1 (10.2.240.173) closed connection to service bjames [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/24 09:10:48, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service bjames initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 10715) [2004/06/24 09:19:45, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1055) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 20578 on port 4027 for dev = 811, inode = 541045, file_id = 23 [2004/06/24 09:19:45, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(731) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by process 20578 after break ! For file My Documents/Product/Game Buys/July/gamebuyJULY.2004.xls, dev = 811, inode = 541045. Deleting it to continue... [2004/06/24
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:30:09AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: It solved some of the issues we've been seeing, but we're still getting reports of delays while trying to open files of over a minute. The message I originally forwarded mentioned twice this morning. Here's the server log for that user with the above mentioned LDAP search failures removed since they appear to be unrelated (they happen much more often than the problem and nobody complains when they do happen): [2004/06/24 09:19:45, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1055) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 20578 on port 4027 for dev = 811, inode = 541045, file_id = 23 Check network hardware (negotiation etc). This is usually called by a flakey network. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:29:32 -0700 Check network hardware (negotiation etc). This is usually called by a flakey network. ~sigh~ Thanks, but neither the server nor the switch are showing any network problems. Hell, we aren't even seeing any collisions on the server: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:B7:3E:A0:4D inet addr:10.2.240.1 Bcast:10.2.240.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:52198838 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:47574112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 RX bytes:591919497 (564.4 Mb) TX bytes:2269551243 (2164.4 Mb) Any firewalling hardware/software involved? Particularly the windows xp firewall? -- Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:00:48AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: ~sigh~ Thanks, but neither the server nor the switch are showing any network problems. Hell, we aren't even seeing any collisions on the server: Ok, so can you reproduce this ? Are you using latest svn code ? If you can reproduce this at will please tell me how and I'll look at it immediately. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:02:07 -0700 On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:00:48AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: ~sigh~ Thanks, but neither the server nor the switch are showing any netw ork problems. Hell, we aren't even seeing any collisions on the server: Ok, so can you reproduce this ? Are you using latest svn code ? If you can reproduce this at will please tell me how and I'll look at it immediately. I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpl3b1c6X7e8.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500 I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Got it! Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch. When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over itself. Say that you want to save the file over itself. Things go to hell. I just did this on a W2K box and my co-worker did it on an XP box. I don't know how long lunch has to be. We had Thai. (Stir fried red herring!) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpfZ3UZ5VCSz.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:45:03PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500 I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Got it! Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch. When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over itself. Say that you want to save the file over itself. Things go to hell. I just did this on a W2K box and my co-worker did it on an XP box. I don't know how long lunch has to be. We had Thai. (Stir fried red herring!) Ok, thanks. A couple of questions. What MS-Office version ? What Samba code version (is this current svn code) ? What is your platform ? What oplock settings do you have in your smb.conf ? Jeremy. (What is your favourite color, what is the flight speed of a fully laden sparrow... :-) ? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:48:43 -0700 Ok, thanks. A couple of questions. What MS-Office version ? What Samba code version (is this current svn code) ? What is your platform ? What oplock settings do you have in your smb.conf ? I'm running Excel 2K on Win2k. Samba was built this base weekend from SVN (3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1202). The server is mandrake Linux kernel 2.4.22-30mdk. kernel oplocks = Yes oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No Oplocks settings have been changed repeatedly as we've tried to figure things out. I intend to turn them back on again. (What is your favourite color, what is the flight speed of a fully laden sparrow... :-) ? Blueno red. African or European? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpTamrUQ56Cx.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:45:03PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500 I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Got it! Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch. When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over itself. Say that you want to save the file over itself. Things go to hell. I just did this on a W2K box and my co-worker did it on an XP box. I don't know how long lunch has to be. We had Thai. (Stir fried red herring!) Ok, I'm using these oplock settings with the current svn code : kernel oplocks = Yes oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No from a XP client using Excel 2000 9.0.3821 SR-1, I've saved it and am now going to lunch :-). I'll let you know if it happens for me. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:45:03PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500 I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Got it! Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch. When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over itself. Say that you want to save the file over itself. Things go to hell. I just did this on a W2K box and my co-worker did it on an XP box. I don't know how long lunch has to be. We had Thai. (Stir fried red herring!) I'm still trying to reproduce this. Can you send me a debug level 10 of you reproducing it please ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:45:03PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500 I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Got it! Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch. When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over itself. Say that you want to save the file over itself. Things go to hell. I just did this on a W2K box and my co-worker did it on an XP box. I don't know how long lunch has to be. We had Thai. (Stir fried red herring!) I can't reproduce this :-(. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
