Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-09-30 Thread Martha Mattson
I would think that one of the criteria for lower level care for those patients 
would be the ability to get q 2 hours vital signs for at least 24 hours, and do 
serial lactates q 6 hours for 24 hours as well.  If staffing or new technology 
in a step-down or telemetry would support this,  then deterioration would be 
able to be picked up more quickly and it should be safe to admit the patient 
there, rather than ICU.

 

Martie

Martie Mattson, RN, MSN, CNS, CCRN(a)

Critical Care Consultant and Educator

 mailto:mattsonconsult...@comcast.net mattsonconsult...@comcast.net

(415) 412-2364

 

 

From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Mary Draper
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:32 AM
To: Jamie Roney
Cc: sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

 

If they are hemodynamically stable and have responded to fluids, they could go 
to a telemetry unit but those nurses have 4-5 patients and subtle changes 
leading to instability can get missed. 




Mary Draper RN BSN CCRN

Quality Manager-Best Practice Support

Quality Management Supervisor

Office (925) 674-2045 tel:(925)%20674-2045 

Cell (925) 451-8792 tel:(925)%20451-8792 

Fax (925) 674-2373 tel:(925)%20674-2373 

 mailto:mary.dra...@johnmuirhealth.com mary.dra...@johnmuirhealth.com


On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Jamie Roney jro...@covhs.org 
mailto:jro...@covhs.org  wrote:

Dr. Townsend,
Is there a sepsis specific risk/treatment stratification tool available to 
assist in answering your question of placement in a possible lower level of 
care? Or is there a tool to assist with septic patients who can be discharged 
home versus admitted due to probable deterioration into severe sepsis?

Thank you,
Jamie

Jamie Roney, BSN, RN-BC, BSHCM, CCRN
COVENANT HEALTH SEPSIS COORDINATOR
Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren't used to an environment where 
excellence is expected. ~Steve Jobs

3615 19th Street, Lubbock, TX 79410
T: (806) 725-4689C: (806) 773-1914
www.covenanthealth.org http://www.covenanthealth.org 
..



-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org  
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
mailto:sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org '
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org mailto:towns...@sutterhealth.org 
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
mailto:Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Notice from St. Joseph Health System:
Please note that the information contained in this message may be privileged 
and confidential and protected from disclosure.
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
mailto:Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-09-28 Thread Mary Draper
If they are hemodynamically stable and have responded to fluids, they could go 
to a telemetry unit but those nurses have 4-5 patients and subtle changes 
leading to instability can get missed.

Mary Draper RN BSN CCRN
Quality Manager-Best Practice Support
Quality Management Supervisor
Office (925) 674-2045tel:(925)%20674-2045
Cell (925) 451-8792tel:(925)%20451-8792
Fax (925) 674-2373tel:(925)%20674-2373
mary.dra...@johnmuirhealth.commailto:mary.dra...@johnmuirhealth.com

On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Jamie Roney 
jro...@covhs.orgmailto:jro...@covhs.org wrote:

Dr. Townsend,
Is there a sepsis specific risk/treatment stratification tool available to 
assist in answering your question of placement in a possible lower level of 
care? Or is there a tool to assist with septic patients who can be discharged 
home versus admitted due to probable deterioration into severe sepsis?

Thank you,
Jamie

Jamie Roney, BSN, RN-BC, BSHCM, CCRN
COVENANT HEALTH SEPSIS COORDINATOR
Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren't used to an environment where 
excellence is expected. ~Steve Jobs

3615 19th Street, Lubbock, TX 79410
T: (806) 725-4689C: (806) 773-1914
www.covenanthealth.orghttp://www.covenanthealth.org
..



-Original Message-
From: 
sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.orgmailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
 [mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:32 AM
To: 
'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.orgmailto:sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.orgmailto:towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.orgmailto:Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Notice from St. Joseph Health System:
Please note that the information contained in this message may be privileged 
and confidential and protected from disclosure.
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.orgmailto:Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-22 Thread Juanita Fernandes
I have to agree with Mary Ann. Our hospital tracks admissions that are
transferred from an inpatient unit to the ICU within 24 hours of
admission. The nurse to patient ratio on inpatient units does not always
lend itself to frequent enough assessments to catch patients early on in
the game. We try to advocate for the ICU if the patient is in severe
sepsis. When we talk about being stabilized in the ED we are often
giving a lot of fluids - something that the inpatient nurses do not have
orders for and are not comfortable with. I have encouraged my ED staff
to cut the patient's fluid back to the rate that has been ordered on the
inpatient orders. If there is change in VS they then have something to
go to the hospitalist with to support the need for ICU. 

 
Juanita Fernandes, RN, BSN, CEN

Emergency Department Nurse Educator
Concord Hospital
250 Pleasant Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301
(603) 227-7000 ext. 3138
Pager (603) 221-1104
 On 3/18/2013 at 12:19 PM, Daly, Mary Ann
dal...@sutterhealth.org wrote:

Since I have gotten some feedback regarding my post about our admission
to ICU ratio to mortality I wanted to clarify.
I wasn't suggesting that every patient in every hospital with severe
sepsis requires an ICU admission. Just stating how our data supports
this for our institutions (6 in all)

Perhaps if we had more optimal care in other areas of the hospital the
necessity would be less for ICU

That said, I am reading many posts about 'good clinical medicine' and
deciding the disposition of the patient on a case-by-case basis.  This
is akin to how we treated cardiac patients (and in some cases still do)
i.e. deciding  the  extent of cardiac involvement based on 'how the
patient looks'. The problem with placing patients who has responded to
initial therapy on the floors - is the level of surveillance and the
rapid response to timely assessments = all done more effectively in the
ICU setting.  

I would rather admit a stable patient to ICU for 6-12 hours then
transfer knowing that stability has been maintained then wait for a
patient to decompensate on the floors (data shows patients are typically
in organ failure for 12 hrs to 2-3 days before they are transferred)
which confers an increased mortality risk. This is supported by the SSC
data base for the US and Europe. 
  

Thanks, 

Mary Ann Daly, RN BSN CCRN DC 
Regional Clinical Initiative Lead-Sepsis and ICU Liberation (ABCDE)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant 
Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region 
E-mail: dal...@sutterhealth.org 
Blackberry: 916.200.5604   Office: 916.614.6370
ý You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change
something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. R.
Buckminster Fuller



-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of
peggy.siene...@hcahealthcare.com
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:05 AM
To: Townsend, Sean, M.D.; sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

Sean,
My answer is NO...they do not all need ICU.  I think it is very patient
specific and determined by how close to the edge they arefor lack
of a better way to say it right now. The numbers do not ALWAYS reflect
the patient statusWe put some on the medical unit that seem to be
stable after ED treatmentsure, a tiny few may end up being RRT'ed
later...but for the most partthose with SS that are admitted to the
floor instead of ICU seem to be OK once they get the antibiotic and
fluids in ED and stabilize rather quickly.  I would never treat it as a
black and white decision with strictly numbers and test results. One has
to see the patient and know the patient...including co-morbidities and
response to the treatment you have initiated already.  Just my 2 cents.

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of
Townsend, Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to
think I knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be
admitted to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring
do they deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor?
Need the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541

Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-20 Thread Matt Reavill
Thank you Mary Ann,

The 'ICU for a while' brings up a good point.  Again it's not a choice.

DRG 870 SEPTICEMIA OR SEVERE SEPSIS W MV 96+ HOURS
DRG 871 SEPTICEMIA OR SEVERE SEPSIS W/O MV 96+ HOURS W MCC
DRG 872 SEPTICEMIA OR SEVERE SEPSIS W/O MV 96+ HOURS W/O MCC

If following the protocol in the Emergency Department locks in the words
Severe Sepsis, the DRG choices are fairly few.

Since CMS defines Severe Sepsis as a Major Complication and Comorbid
Condition (No real way to reach DRG 872 anyway) it's really not much of a
choice.  Link below.

http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/49063853?access_key=key-pc7882f7c4p9l3y76yj
 
If you want to get reimbursed for treating Severe Sepsis then you'll have to
treat it the way CMS is expecting it done.

Matt Reavill

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Daly, Mary
Ann
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:19 AM
To: 'peggy.siene...@hcahealthcare.com'; Townsend, Sean, M.D.;
'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

Since I have gotten some feedback regarding my post about our admission to
ICU ratio to mortality I wanted to clarify.
 I wasn't suggesting that every patient in every hospital with severe sepsis
requires an ICU admission. Just stating how our data supports this for our
institutions (6 in all)

Perhaps if we had more optimal care in other areas of the hospital the
necessity would be less for ICU

That said, I am reading many posts about 'good clinical medicine' and
deciding the disposition of the patient on a case-by-case basis.  This is
akin to how we treated cardiac patients (and in some cases still do) i.e.
deciding  the  extent of cardiac involvement based on 'how the patient
looks'. The problem with placing patients who has responded to initial
therapy on the floors - is the level of surveillance and the rapid response
to timely assessments = all done more effectively in the ICU setting.  

I would rather admit a stable patient to ICU for 6-12 hours then transfer
knowing that stability has been maintained then wait for a patient to
decompensate on the floors (data shows patients are typically in organ
failure for 12 hrs to 2-3 days before they are transferred) which confers an
increased mortality risk. This is supported by the SSC data base for the US
and Europe. 
  

Thanks, 

Mary Ann Daly, RN BSN CCRN DC
Regional Clinical Initiative Lead-Sepsis and ICU Liberation (ABCDE) Gordon
and Betty Moore Foundation Grant Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region
E-mail: dal...@sutterhealth.org
Blackberry: 916.200.5604   Office: 916.614.6370 ‎ You never change things by
fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that
makes the existing model obsolete. R. Buckminster Fuller



-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of
peggy.siene...@hcahealthcare.com
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:05 AM
To: Townsend, Sean, M.D.; sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

Sean,
My answer is NO...they do not all need ICU.  I think it is very patient
specific and determined by how close to the edge they arefor lack of a
better way to say it right now. The numbers do not ALWAYS reflect the
patient statusWe put some on the medical unit that seem to be stable
after ED treatmentsure, a tiny few may end up being RRT'ed later...but
for the most partthose with SS that are admitted to the floor instead of
ICU seem to be OK once they get the antibiotic and fluids in ED and
stabilize rather quickly.  I would never treat it as a black and white
decision with strictly numbers and test results. One has to see the patient
and know the patient...including co-morbidities and response to the
treatment you have initiated already.  Just my 2 cents.

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend,
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be
admitted to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do
they deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor?
Need the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San

Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-20 Thread Cormack, Patricia (WS)
Mary Ann,

The clinical decisions should be driven by the Severe sepsis screening tool, 
not just whether the patient looks good. Step down units in organizations that 
allow severe sepsis to be admitted to step-down usually have severe sepsis 
orders that trigger aggressive fluid management and transfer if the patient's 
lactate trends up or BP trends down. If the process is thought out and 
education is broad and accountability is established, severe sepsis can 
definitely be safely managed outside of the ICU. Many severe sepsis patient are 
admitted to the ICU based on what the organ failure is and ICU criteria. The 
early identification, early antibiotic, and monitoring for progression in 
patients without lactic acidosis or hypotension can be effectively achieved 
outside ICU. So case by case basis is not based on clinician opinion, but an 
established protocol/process determined by our sepsis team.

Patty

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Daly, Mary Ann
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:19 AM
To: 'peggy.siene...@hcahealthcare.com'; Townsend, Sean, M.D.; 
'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

Since I have gotten some feedback regarding my post about our admission to ICU 
ratio to mortality I wanted to clarify.
 I wasn't suggesting that every patient in every hospital with severe sepsis 
requires an ICU admission. Just stating how our data supports this for our 
institutions (6 in all)

Perhaps if we had more optimal care in other areas of the hospital the 
necessity would be less for ICU

That said, I am reading many posts about 'good clinical medicine' and deciding 
the disposition of the patient on a case-by-case basis.  This is akin to how we 
treated cardiac patients (and in some cases still do) i.e. deciding  the  
extent of cardiac involvement based on 'how the patient looks'. The problem 
with placing patients who has responded to initial therapy on the floors - is 
the level of surveillance and the rapid response to timely assessments = all 
done more effectively in the ICU setting.  

I would rather admit a stable patient to ICU for 6-12 hours then transfer 
knowing that stability has been maintained then wait for a patient to 
decompensate on the floors (data shows patients are typically in organ failure 
for 12 hrs to 2-3 days before they are transferred) which confers an increased 
mortality risk. This is supported by the SSC data base for the US and Europe. 
  

Thanks, 

Mary Ann Daly, RN BSN CCRN DC 
Regional Clinical Initiative Lead-Sepsis and ICU Liberation (ABCDE)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant 
Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region 
E-mail: dal...@sutterhealth.org 
Blackberry: 916.200.5604   Office: 916.614.6370
‎ You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change 
something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. R. 
Buckminster Fuller



-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of 
peggy.siene...@hcahealthcare.com
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:05 AM
To: Townsend, Sean, M.D.; sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

Sean,
My answer is NO...they do not all need ICU.  I think it is very patient 
specific and determined by how close to the edge they arefor lack of a 
better way to say it right now. The numbers do not ALWAYS reflect the patient 
statusWe put some on the medical unit that seem to be stable after ED 
treatmentsure, a tiny few may end up being RRT'ed later...but for the most 
partthose with SS that are admitted to the floor instead of ICU seem to be 
OK once they get the antibiotic and fluids in ED and stabilize rather quickly.  
I would never treat it as a black and white decision with strictly numbers and 
test results. One has to see the patient and know the patient...including 
co-morbidities and response to the treatment you have initiated already.  Just 
my 2 cents.

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics

Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-19 Thread Daly, Mary Ann
Since I have gotten some feedback regarding my post about our admission to ICU 
ratio to mortality I wanted to clarify.
 I wasn't suggesting that every patient in every hospital with severe sepsis 
requires an ICU admission. Just stating how our data supports this for our 
institutions (6 in all)

Perhaps if we had more optimal care in other areas of the hospital the 
necessity would be less for ICU

That said, I am reading many posts about 'good clinical medicine' and deciding 
the disposition of the patient on a case-by-case basis.  This is akin to how we 
treated cardiac patients (and in some cases still do) i.e. deciding  the  
extent of cardiac involvement based on 'how the patient looks'. The problem 
with placing patients who has responded to initial therapy on the floors - is 
the level of surveillance and the rapid response to timely assessments = all 
done more effectively in the ICU setting.  

I would rather admit a stable patient to ICU for 6-12 hours then transfer 
knowing that stability has been maintained then wait for a patient to 
decompensate on the floors (data shows patients are typically in organ failure 
for 12 hrs to 2-3 days before they are transferred) which confers an increased 
mortality risk. This is supported by the SSC data base for the US and Europe. 
  

Thanks, 

Mary Ann Daly, RN BSN CCRN DC 
Regional Clinical Initiative Lead-Sepsis and ICU Liberation (ABCDE)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant 
Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region 
E-mail: dal...@sutterhealth.org 
Blackberry: 916.200.5604   Office: 916.614.6370
‎ You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change 
something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. R. 
Buckminster Fuller



-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of 
peggy.siene...@hcahealthcare.com
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:05 AM
To: Townsend, Sean, M.D.; sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

Sean,
My answer is NO...they do not all need ICU.  I think it is very patient 
specific and determined by how close to the edge they arefor lack of a 
better way to say it right now. The numbers do not ALWAYS reflect the patient 
statusWe put some on the medical unit that seem to be stable after ED 
treatmentsure, a tiny few may end up being RRT'ed later...but for the most 
partthose with SS that are admitted to the floor instead of ICU seem to be 
OK once they get the antibiotic and fluids in ED and stabilize rather quickly.  
I would never treat it as a black and white decision with strictly numbers and 
test results. One has to see the patient and know the patient...including 
co-morbidities and response to the treatment you have initiated already.  Just 
my 2 cents.

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-18 Thread Fuchs, Barry
From our recent study on the coding of severe sepsis cases, in whittaker s, et 
al CCM 2013, where our gold standard reference group was all ED pt's 
prospectively screened for severe sepsis, the proportion of severe sepsis cases 
that were cared for in the ICU vs floors was ~ 50%. As was previously stated, 
the icu cohort are primarily EGDT eligible, hemodynamically unstable, pt's as 
well as those with acute respiratory failure that complicates or follows 
presentation. Of note, this study did not include severe sepsis cases that 
developed in-house, but there is no reason to think that the care venue would 
differ in these cases. 
Hope this helps. 
Barry Fuchs 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 17, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Terry Clemmer terry.clem...@imail.org wrote:

 Severe sepsis no, it depends on what organs are failing, septic shock yes.
 
 Terry P. Clemmer, MD
 Director of Critical Care Medicine
 LDS Hospital
 8th Ave and 'C' Street
 Salt Lake City, Utah 84143
 
 Phone 801-408-3661
 E-mail: terry.clem...@imail.org
 
 
 Confidential Report for Improvement of Hospital, Facility and Patient 
 Care--Not Part of Medical Record and Not to be Used in Litigation--Prepared 
 Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 26-25-1 et seq., or Idaho Code Ann. § 39-1392 et 
 seq.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
 [mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
 Sean, M.D.
 Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:32 AM
 To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
 Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?
 
 It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
 knew the answer.
 
 Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be 
 admitted to the ICU ?
 
 Examples:
 
 1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
 2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
 3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.
 
 Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do 
 they deserve?
 
 By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
 spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
 the ICU? Why?
 
 Sean
 
 
 Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
 Vice President of Quality  Safety
 California Pacific Medical Center
 2330 Clay Street, #301
 San Francisco, CA 94115
 email towns...@sutterhealth.org
 office (415) 600-5770
 fax (415) 600-1541
 ___
 Sepsisgroups mailing list
 Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
 http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
 ___
 Sepsisgroups mailing list
 Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
 http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have 
received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, 
and delete the original message.
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-18 Thread Townsend, Sean, M.D.
Dear Doris,

Questions about strategies to improve practice on the listserv are a good 
thing. Not having a strategy beyond everyone's best judgment is probably not 
the right answer on the exam.

I'm sure you have great judgment, but we all know many colleagues who would 
benefit from some guidance on where to place patients.

Judgment alone hasn't done much to get adherence to best therapies. In the 
world's best example, Intermountain Healthcare in Utah, adherence to bundled 
therapies is 85% or so. Their mortality rate for severe sepsis is less than 
10%. The rest of us can't say either of those things. Their publication is in 
peer review and soon we'll all see clearly the power of their example.

I just wanted to survey the crowd that has demonstrated interest in this 
subject for what they do so I can fix my own problems.

Sean




Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541

-Original Message-
From: Doberenz, Doris 
[doris.dober...@imperial.nhs.ukmailto:doris.dober...@imperial.nhs.uk]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 08:44 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?


Why is so much written about this without much real content? How many more or 
less rhetoric questions with or without answers because our patients and their 
diseases and severity actually vary... OOOPS who'd have thought that!? For 
example 'where severe sepsis belongs' will depend on seeing the patient as a 
clinician in addition to certain quite clear severity criteria in their context 
and conjunction e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, resp rate, urine output, lab 
signs of organ failure, lactate, central venous sats if available), and to 
decide how severe the whole situation is and thus how much monitoring and 
support a specific patient in a specific situation and severity needs. How many 
more mails and how many more pages of guidelines and time and expense of 
development of these guidelines by experts do we need for this and how many not 
always sufficiently evidence based but dictatorial bundles, which then get 
overtaken by the scientific evidence (e.g APC, steroids)??? Back t
 o the shopfloor (and the floor or the ICU according to the real need) and back 
to basics, and back to applying good medicine and good science for each 
individual patient and his or her specific situation rather than being spoonfed 
and dictated bundle criteria from some institute without sufficient robust 
and durable scientific evidence...


Doris Doberenz FRCA FFICM EDAIC EDA
Consultant
Intensive Care Unit and Anaesthetic Department
Charing Cross Hospital
Fulham Palace Rd
London W6 8RF
Tel 020 3311 1234 bleep 5742
Mobile 07855 754 160









-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: 15 March 2013 06:32
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust notice: The contents of
this
e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address
to
which it is addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not
the
addressee of this e-mail you may not copy, forward, disclose or
otherwise use it in any form whatsoever. If you have received this
e-mail in error please telephone the Imperial College Healthcare
NHS
Trust on +44 (0)20 3311 3311 and ask for the person who sent
you the
email. Please also delete the message from your computer. [end]
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list

Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread Daly, Mary Ann
Sean, 
Although I believe you know the answer that comes from Sutter Health - 
Sacramento Sierra Region from our data that you have seen, the answer to your 
question is, IMHO, fairly pragmatic. In our larger (community) hospitals, as 
many severe sepsis patients as possible go directly from ED to the ICU (2/3 - 
3/4) and in those institutions our mortality rates are significantly improved. 
But our smaller hospitals, where the ICU bed capacity is 6-8, the majority of 
severe sepsis patients are admitted to med- surg with attendant higher 
mortality rates. (with one notable exception in Amador where a small hospital 
with an 6 bed ICU admits severe sepsis patients to the unit more frequently 
again with an attendant lower mortality rate)

Thanks, 

Mary Ann Daly, RN BSN CCRN DC 
Regional Clinical Initiative Lead-Sepsis and ICU Liberation (ABCDE)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant 
Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region 
E-mail: dal...@sutterhealth.org 
Blackberry: 916.200.5604   Office: 916.614.6370
‎ You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change 
something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. R. 
Buckminster Fuller


-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:32 PM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread Doberenz, Doris
Why is so much written about this without much real content? How many more or 
less rhetoric questions with or without answers because our patients and their 
diseases and severity actually vary... OOOPS who'd have thought that!? For 
example 'where severe sepsis belongs' will depend on seeing the patient as a 
clinician in addition to certain quite clear severity criteria in their context 
and conjunction e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, resp rate, urine output, lab 
signs of organ failure, lactate, central venous sats if available), and to 
decide how severe the whole situation is and thus how much monitoring and 
support a specific patient in a specific situation and severity needs. How many 
more mails and how many more pages of guidelines and time and expense of 
development of these guidelines by experts do we need for this and how many not 
always sufficiently evidence based but dictatorial bundles, which then get 
overtaken by the scientific evidence (e.g APC, steroids)??? Back t
 o the shopfloor (and the floor or the ICU according to the real need) and back 
to basics, and back to applying good medicine and good science for each 
individual patient and his or her specific situation rather than being spoonfed 
and dictated bundle criteria from some institute without sufficient robust 
and durable scientific evidence...

 
Doris Doberenz FRCA FFICM EDAIC EDA
Consultant
Intensive Care Unit and Anaesthetic Department
Charing Cross Hospital
Fulham Palace Rd
London W6 8RF
Tel 020 3311 1234 bleep 5742
Mobile 07855 754 160









-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: 15 March 2013 06:32
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust notice: The contents of 
this
e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address 
to
which it is addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not 
the
addressee of this e-mail you may not copy, forward, disclose or
otherwise use it in any form whatsoever. If you have received this
e-mail in error please telephone the Imperial College Healthcare 
NHS
Trust on +44 (0)20 3311 3311 and ask for the person who sent 
you the
email. Please also delete the message from your computer. [end]
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread fsebat
Sean,

 

At our institution and I am sure at other hospitals a number of septic patients 
are admitted to the floor and subsequently within 24hr are transferred to CC- 
sicker and likely with longer LOS than if they had been initial monitored and 
fluid resuscitated more closely in CC from the onset.

 

 CC units in best practice hospital according to the APACHE III data base have 
between 10 to 20 low risk monitor patients (i.e. are not actively receiving a 
CC dependent intervention) but are At-Risk this I believe is appropriate 
similar to negative lap rate for appendectomies  so as to not miss any- as the 
down side is great. If your institution has an experience different than above 
then perhaps your may have too many low risk monitor patients in CC  and could 
benefit from a change in strategy .

 

 Looking at our data however we are still admitting too many patents that would 
benefit from intensive monitoring to the floors with delay in resuscitation and 
its associated morbidity and mortality.

 

Your question I believe is where is the break point when a CC admission is not 
need for a septic patient. In my opinion if you still meet sever sepsis 
criteria after initial ED or floor resuscitation (1000cc of fluids and 
antibiotics) you will likely benefit from CC. Moving a septic patient out of CC 
after 6 or 12hr, if no longer, needed makes more sense than transferring to CC 
after 6 or 12 hr of under resuscitation.

 

My thoughts, Frank.

 

Frank Sebat MD FCCM

Medical Director of RRS

Kaweah Delta Medical Center

Visalia 

 


  Sent: ‎March‎ ‎14‎, ‎2013 ‎11‎:‎31‎ ‎PM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?
 

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread Matt Reavill
Hello Dr. Townsend,

The successful systematic approach to the determination of Severe Sepsis has
no choice but the ICU.  The death statistics used to propagate the protocols
adoption have left no other choice but an all out attempt to prevent the
patient's well researched impending death.  That being the ICU as universal
best place to try and prevent it.

Saying you don't need the ICU to those who have yet to adopt a sepsis
protocol is to say to them that they're not really in that great of danger.

An awareness campaign is a double edged sword.


Matt Reavill


-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend,
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be
admitted to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do
they deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor?
Need the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread Ron Daniels
Hi Sean,

Certainly in the UK, to take all patients with severe sepsis to ITU would
swamp our services very quickly! We have relatively few ITU beds per capita
and would adopt a more pragmatic approach, assessing first response to
therapy and admitting those requiring haemodynamic and/or other organ
support only.

That said, we do have the luxury of Critical Care Outreach to keep an eye
on such patients on the wards...


BW

Ron

On Friday, March 15, 2013, Townsend, Sean, M.D. wrote:

 It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think
 I knew the answer.

 Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be
 admitted to the ICU ?

 Examples:

 1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
 2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
 3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

 Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do
 they deserve?

 By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad
 spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor?
 Need the ICU? Why?

 Sean


 Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
 Vice President of Quality  Safety
 California Pacific Medical Center
 2330 Clay Street, #301
 San Francisco, CA 94115
 email towns...@sutterhealth.org javascript:;
 office (415) 600-5770
 fax (415) 600-1541
 ___
 Sepsisgroups mailing list
 Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org javascript:;
 http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org



-- 
Dr Ron Daniels

*Chair- UK Sepsis Trust*
*Chief Executive- Global Sepsis Alliance
Founding Fellow- Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine*

*Suspect sepsis- save someone’s life today!*
*
Twitter: @Sepsis UK*
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread Silvers MD, Jeffrey H
Our answer to your question is no.  Everyone who needs EGDT and agrees to 
treatment gets admitted to the ICU.  If the patient gets adequate evaluation, 
treatment and stabilization in the emergency room, then a very large percentage 
of patients with severe sepsis can be treated outside of the ICU.

Jeffrey Silvers, M.D.
Medical Director of Quality
Eden Medical Center Castro Valley, CA

-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:32 PM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


Re: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

2013-03-17 Thread Terry Clemmer
Severe sepsis no, it depends on what organs are failing, septic shock yes.

Terry P. Clemmer, MD
Director of Critical Care Medicine
LDS Hospital
8th Ave and 'C' Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84143

Phone 801-408-3661
E-mail: terry.clem...@imail.org


Confidential Report for Improvement of Hospital, Facility and Patient 
Care--Not Part of Medical Record and Not to be Used in Litigation--Prepared 
Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 26-25-1 et seq., or Idaho Code Ann. § 39-1392 et 
seq.


-Original Message-
From: sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org 
[mailto:sepsisgroups-boun...@lists.sepsisgroups.org] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:32 AM
To: 'sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality  Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email towns...@sutterhealth.org
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
___
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org