Re: [Bulk] [RCSE] The posts that meant the most

2008-08-27 Thread Chuck Anderson
I too have been a subscriber from the start.  The oldest post in my 
Humor folder is from November, 1995 and I did not save earlier posts.


Early on, I realized that there was a lot of good information from 
real experts so began saving the technical posts in separate 
folders.  Some of the folders were for aerodynamics, electronics, 
structures, flutter, humor, soaring history, launch equipment, and 
one just for Joe Wurts posts.  The good technical stuff has vanished 
from RCSE so it won't be the loss it could have been if RCSE had 
disappeared 10 years ago.  I collected some of the best on 
aerodynamics and structures into a word document for easy reference 
and it turned out to be over a hundred pages.


RC Groups is a poor substitute for what RCSE has been but I suppose I 
will have to do with what is available.


Chuck Anderson 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] A typical post from the good old days

2008-08-27 Thread Chuck Anderson
This is a typical post from the good old days when RCSE was 
young.  But like all of us, RCSE declined with age.   This is what 
made RCSE so great.  Now all we get is what is the latest and 
greatest moldy and who won the last contest.  Maybe it is time for 
RCSE to depart.


This was the first of several posts Joe made about dynamic soaring.

Chuck Anderson

From: Joe  Wurts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 28 May 96 02:35:19 EDT
Subject: Dynamic Soaring
Status: RO

For quite a long time I've heard about dynamic soaring, but have 
almost never really used it in any operational sense while flying rc 
gliders.  In fact, I've kind of filed it under the Holy Grail 
category. Just one of those things that you read about.  But I've now 
had  a bit of practical experience with it.


One of the slopes that I have been flying at has a very pronounced 
razor back to it (Parker Mountain near Acton CA).  What is really 
neat about it is that the air behind the hill is completely 
separated. That is, it can be blowing 25 mph on the face, and behind 
the hill, it is almost calm and sometimes even blowing softly in the 
opposite direction.  It turns out that this is an absolutely perfect 
set-up for dynamic soaring.  All you have to do is fly straight 
down-wind over the hill into the calm air and turn around.  If you 
want, when you  come back over the upwind face, turn around and 
repeat.  With each turn, you get an amazing boost in the energy of 
the glider.The first time I really played with this was with my 
Floyd, and on the second go-around I fluttered the wings.  The plane 
will take an extended vertical dive without any possibility of 
flutter, so I was able to get it to above the terminal velocity of 
the glider in horizontal flight!!!


One thing that is especially wild is when the wind dies down a bit, 
and you can just stay up in the normal lift in minimum sink mode. 
Start doing the orbiting for the dynamic soaring and you can get up 
to about three times the speed that you can when you just fly in the 
normal slope lift.  Wild stuff.  What really gets entertaining is 
when you make a mistake behind the hill.  The air is a bit turbulent, 
and occasionally I miss the air (read: smite the earth).  This is 
where a good foamie comes in handy.  I woulda never really 
investigated this phenomena without a crash-proof plane.


If your slope has separated air behind the hill, and you do not mind 
occasionally crashing while you learn a new trick, give this a 
try.  Caution, I'd recommend trying this maneuver out sometime when 
you have the hill to yourself.  It takes a little getting used to... 
And a hint, the lower you go on the downwind side, the better off you 
are (more delta-vee typically).


Joe Wurts


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] In Memory of RCSE

2008-08-25 Thread Chuck Anderson
Sorry to hear that RCSE is ending soon.  RCSE is the ONLY  reason I 
still subscribe to Model Airplane News.  I feel that was the least I 
could do for giving us RCSE.  My oldest issue of MAN is dated 1947 
and I still have most issues since then.  It has been many years 
since MAN has had anything of interest to me so I will not renew my 
subscription when it expires.


MAN has been slicking up and dumbing down for years until it has sunk 
to little more than a picture magazine.  When I need something to 
read, I go to the attic and bring down a few issues of MAN, Model 
Builder, RCM, or Air Trails to read.  They are a lot more interesting 
than anything published today.  Model Builder was the last really 
interesting model magazine.


Chuck

At 04:15 PM 8/25/2008, you wrote:

The time is now for the end of RCSE.

RCSE has been around forever in Internet years, since the 90's.  I 
can't even remember when it started. Some of the online stuff goes 
back to around 1999, I know I have some stuff back to 1996 and that 
is definitely not the oldest stuff.


Posts to the list have gone down, mostly stuff about events that are 
happening out there.  There hasn't been too much serious discussion 
in a while and flame wars, well everyone has been civilized.


The equipment that the list is running on is aging and it's kind of 
hard to get excited about a mailing list these days.  RCSE has been 
around forever in Internet years, since the early 90's.  I can't 
even remember when it started. The computer guys at Airage want to 
shut the server down as soon as they can.  It's not too cool to be 
running a Windows NT server these days.  There are probably other 
security reasons to shut it down.


I don't have a shut down date for RCSE, but expect it to be 
soon.So if you have any favorite memories, please post them to 
the list before it goes away. Maybe you can mention your favorite 
technical guru's discussion, flame war or Sal bashing.  And sorry, 
RCSE won't cover the infamous challenge by Lucas to Joe.


Thanks for the memories.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Removing old covering, more info

2008-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:49 AM 8/18/2008, you wrote:
It's hard to tell what type of covering it is... It's over 40 years 
old so it can't be any type of iron on,  Its not silk, but does apear to be

dope based

Craig


Skyloft was a popular covering material from the late 60s.  Skyloft 
was a nylon mat material that looked a lot like silkspan but was much 
stronger.  It was applied with dope just like silkspan.  I used it to 
cover several RC pattern models between 1969 and 1974 and even 
covered a free flight wing with skyloft.  If you crashed a built up 
model covered with skyloft, you never needed a trash bag for the 
parts after a crash.  The skyloft served quite well to contain the parts.  :)


Chuck



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Tullahom Fall Soaring Contest

2008-08-07 Thread Chuck Anderson
I never heard that one before but  have heard 
many complaints about not flying all classes each 
day.  I quit going to Florida contests when they 
started flying a different class every day.  It 
was too far to drive for a one day contest.


Chuck

At 08:52 AM 8/7/2008, you wrote:
Some people were complaining about flying 
multiple models on the same day - so we are trying something different??


Don
www.donclevelandrealty.com

In a message dated 8/6/2008 8:00:55 P.M. Central 
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Why are we not flying all classes both days as we
have been doing for the last 338 years.

Chuck

At 05:25 PM 8/6/2008, you wrote:

The Tullahoma, Tn Coffee Airfoilers announce the
Fall RC Soaring Contest for RES and Unlimited
sailplanes September 13/14 at the club field
with pilots meeting scheduled for 9:00 am.  We
will fly RES on Saturday the 13th and Unlimited
on Sunday the 14th. The format will be
Man-on-Man – task to be
determined.  Awards:  1st, 2nd, and 3rd for each
day. Come join us at one of the finest flying
sites in the Southeast.  CD Don Cleveland:
contact
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
For field information see http://www.cafes.net/herb/

Don
www.donclevelandrealty.com




--
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in
your budget?
http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert- 
review?ncid=aolaut000517Read

reviews on AOL Autos.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane 
News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe 
requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please 
note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages 
must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format






--
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in 
your budget? 
http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut000517Read 
reviews on AOL Autos.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Tullahom Fall Soaring Contest

2008-08-06 Thread Chuck Anderson
Why are we not flying all classes both days as we 
have been doing for the last 338 years.


Chuck

At 05:25 PM 8/6/2008, you wrote:

The Tullahoma, Tn Coffee Airfoilers announce the 
Fall RC Soaring Contest for RES and Unlimited 
sailplanes September 13/14 at the club field 
with pilots meeting scheduled for 9:00 am.  We 
will fly RES on Saturday the 13th and Unlimited 
on Sunday the 14th. The format will be 
Man-on-Man – task to be 
determined.  Awards:  1st, 2nd, and 3rd for each 
day. Come join us at one of the finest flying 
sites in the Southeast.  CD Don Cleveland: 
contact 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] 
For field information see http://www.cafes.net/herb/


Don
www.donclevelandrealty.com




--
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in 
your budget? 
http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut000517Read 
reviews on AOL Autos.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Tullahom Fall Soaring Contest Typo

2008-08-06 Thread Chuck Anderson
While the Coffee Airfoilers have been holding 
sailplane contests for a long time, it's not been 
quite that long.  It should have read  for the last 38 years.


At 08:00 PM 8/6/2008, you wrote:
Why are we not flying all classes both days as 
we have been doing for the last 338 years.


Chuck

At 05:25 PM 8/6/2008, you wrote:

The Tullahoma, Tn Coffee Airfoilers announce 
the Fall RC Soaring Contest for RES and 
Unlimited sailplanes September 13/14 at the 
club field with pilots meeting scheduled for 
9:00 am.  We will fly RES on Saturday the 13th 
and Unlimited on Sunday the 14th. The format 
will be Man-on-Man ­ task to be 
determined.  Awards:  1st, 2nd, and 3rd for 
each day. Come join us at one of the finest 
flying sites in the Southeast.  CD Don 
Cleveland: contact 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] 
For field information see http://www.cafes.net/herb/


Don
www.donclevelandrealty.com




--
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits 
in your budget? 
http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut000517Read 
reviews on AOL Autos.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane 
News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe 
requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please 
note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages 
must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Contests within contests

2008-08-05 Thread Chuck Anderson
I have been doing this at all the contests I have run for the last 30 
years without problems.  Fly the same task with the same task times 
works without problems,  It is a natural.  I don't even see a problem 
flying man-on-man with mixed classes.  RES is as capable as Unlimited 
as far as the duration aspect is concerned.  In fact, I usually fly 
my RES in Unlimited rather that assemble two different models.  My 
Unlimited model serves as my backup when flying in Unlimited.

\
Chuck Anderson



At 04:44 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:

I am not sure if I posted this idea before, so if I did, give it another
thought in the context of the NATs discussions that have happened of late.
Has anyone tried contests within contests?   We often have classes of flyers
segregated by level, but have we done classes of planes within a contest?

For example, you run a winch launched contest but capture who is flying
ailerons and who is flying RES. So you have an overall winner, an aileron
winner and a RES winner without having to run separate contests.  Or maybe
you run Unlimited but capture the 2M planes as a class within the contest.

Has this been done?   Seems it would not be all that hard with the right
computer software. It would seem to me that it would encourage more people
to fly.  A person might feel outclassed with their 2M RES against Supras and
Pikes, but if they can be recognized in 2M or RES within the contest maybe
you get more participation.  It will probably need some software revisions
but once that is done, the computer manages it.  If you use an excel
spreadsheet type approach, then add a column for airplane class.  You
register the pilot and the plane.

Stupid idea?  Great idea?  My experience is  limited here so I don't know
what has been tried.

Best regards,
Ed Anderson


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] No Nats This Year

2008-07-24 Thread Chuck Anderson
Unfortunately, I had to cancel my trip to the Nats this year.  It 
will be the first Nats I have missed since I retired in 1994 and the 
first I have missed since 1974 for reasons other that I couldn't get 
off from work.


I came close to missing 1997.  That year, my eye doctor was carving 
on my left eye with a laser the morning 2-meter was starting.  Even 
then, my wife drove me to Muncie in time to make one token flight in 
Nostalgia.


Chuck Anderson


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] About CDs collecting model information

2008-07-02 Thread Chuck Anderson
I agree.  If someone wants a list of what was flown, let them collect 
the information.  The CD has enough to do.


On July 12, I expect to CD the Coffee Airfoilers RES contest.  This 
will be the 40th year that I have been the CD for at least one AMA 
sanctioned contest.  I have been the CD for at least one sailplane 
contest every year since 1971 and even ran a quarter final and a 
semifinal contest in the 1976 F3B team selection program.  I expect 
to retire as a CD after this years RES contest.


Chuck Anderson

At 11:19 AM 7/2/2008, you wrote:
   The CD of a major event is busy enough before,  during, and 
usually wiped out after the event. An extra responsibility like 
collecting model information is something the CD, usually a 
volunteer who does not fly the event, probably doesn't need.
   Ask yourself this question: just exactly what would I do with 
this information if I had it?

   Speaking from experience,
   Jim Deck
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [Bulk] [RCSE] Unusally High Reports of Carbon Sliver Removals from World Hospitals Today!

2008-04-27 Thread Chuck Anderson
Put a little scratch in the rod and even you will be able to break 
it.  I do not use carbon fiber wing or stab rods because of notch sensitivity.


Chuck

At 09:12 PM 4/26/2008, you wrote:
The new channels were flooded with news of strange snapping sounds 
being heard around the world from basements and garages, and later 
hospitals and clinics reported a strange increase in guys with 
Carbon slivers needing removal


So did any of you guys try breaking a 1/8 carbon tube the length of 
a usual stab axle rod today?


Just wondering what your observations about the experiment are?

The topic actually inspired me to modify my build on the MPX Cularis 
kit to use a 1/8 carbon tube for its stab axle, instead of the 
skinny steel one.  Which will break first, the foam stab or the 1/8 
carbon stab axle?

Gordy




--
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp0030002851AOL Autos.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Snow and Ice at the SWC Today?

2008-02-13 Thread Chuck Anderson

Aren't you glad you moved SOUTH to Louisville?  :)

Chuck 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Snow and Ice at the SWC Today?

2008-02-13 Thread Chuck Anderson

Aren't you glad you moved SOUTH to Louisville?  :)

Chuck 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Dedicated to Gordy!

2008-02-13 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 10:21 AM 2/13/2008, you wrote:
I guess I don't understand the problems most people have with 
winter.  Sure sunny weather is great but if its sunny all the time 
when do you build?  Here in the PNW it was another great day.  It 
rained all day so I got lots of building done before I headed out to 
the slope.  It was fantastic.  One of the best days I've had on the 
slope in a while.   The seenery was beautiful, the conditions were 
near perfect with moderate winds and temps in the upper 
20's.  Tomorrow night I'm going back to the slope for some more 
turns.  I just can't get enough of skiing.


and you?


But the ski boat has trouble with the ice flows.   :)

Chuck 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re: Airfoil flight comparison( HN-216)?

2008-02-01 Thread Chuck Anderson
For over 25 years, I used a system that prevented launching unless 
both the transmitter and receiver were own.  Basically, it was a 
capture tow hook that had to be opened by radio to hook the towline 
to the tow hook and then latched by radio.  It was an EK remote 
release tow hook with a pin at the back that prevented the tow ring 
from coming off.  The EK tow hook was activated by a rigid 
pushrod.  It worked until I ran out of EK tow hooks and began flying 
models too large for the light weight EK tow hook.  In that time, I 
used Rocket City Proto tow hooks that could not easily be modified to 
prevent latching with the radio off for Sailaires and larger 
sailplanes.  When using the Protow, I did launch a Sailaire one time 
with the radio off.  I was lucky and retrieved it with no damage 
after a 45 minute flight.


  A standard tow hook could be made into a capture tow hook by 
installing a retractable pin at the back of the tow hook to prevent 
the tow ring from being attached without the pin being retracted by 
radio.  The pin would also prevent pop offs if left latched until 
just before starting the zoom.   I haven't yet tried this because I 
am too lazy.  Instead I ALWAYS wiggle the controls and see the 
controls move just before hitting the peddle no matter how many times 
I have done it after turning the radios on.  I did launch with the 
radio off three times after I quit using capture tow hooks.


Chuck Anderson

At 08:27 AM 2/1/2008, you wrote:

Gentlemen, I would like your feedback on something I created last
season in a bit of a whim. I have been competing at various TD tasks
in the Northwest over the last 3 years. Over this time I have
witnessed far too many launches where the pilot after the fact
admitted that he/she did not turn on the aircraft. Needless to say
most of the aircraft were lost or seriously damaged. So in search of a
solution I went to a local electronics shop and asked a young guy if
he could give me a hand designing a safety component that might help
avoid this scenario.

Basically we designed a switch with a small tilt sensor and some
latching circuitry. The result is this:

If you remember to turn on the plane the switch works as expected. The
plane powers on and off as it would normally.

If you turn OFF the plane and tilt the aircraft in the desired launch
angle ( this is set by the pilot) the plane turns ITSELF on and stays
on until the circuit is reset by disconnecting / interrupting the
battery. The draw is tiny and the circuit and switch itself 1xx .25
or double the size of a typical 20 amp RC switch.   I have tested the
product in the lab and i know a shop that could likely get the size
down to half its current size or close to the size of a standard
switch

This would of course cost some money out of pocket but I am not sure
if the target market is too limited to bother creating this solution
for. For the most part, the elite pilots I watch either don't even use
a switch or are very disciplined in their launch methodology. The
target market is more appropriately general pilots who may be
approaching the more senior years as well as new pilots.


What do you think people? At your local club have you seen anyone toss
an un-powered glider to its death? Would a product like this be of
value as a replacement for the standard on off switch for your more
senior members or new eager  soaring enthusiasts?


David Webb
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re: capture towhooks

2008-02-01 Thread Chuck Anderson
I only used either the EK Remote Release tow hook which I converted 
to a capture tow hook for models up to 115 inch span such as the 
Paragon.  These models didn't zoom very well and I could usually do 
as well by towing as slow as possible to minimize the amount of 
towline reeled in.  Nothing is more hopeless than  to zoom a Sailaire 
so I always towed as slow as possible and used a capture tow hook to 
avoid popoffs.  The only capture tow hook that was strong enough for 
Sailaire size models was the Rocket City Protow.   Ten years ago when 
I was having eye problems, I flew a Sailaire in Unlimited at the 
Nats.  I towed so slow the winchmaster always made me launch  either 
first or last.


As I said before, a conventional tow hook could be made into a 
capture tow hook by installing a retractable pin at the back of a 
regular tow hook.  The pin would have to be retracted to hook up the 
tow hook.  If this was done with a servo, both the transmitter and 
receiver would have to be on to hook up.  The pin would then be 
retracted after stabilized in the launch and before starting the zoom 
so it shouldn't affect the zoom.


Chuck Anderson

At 06:20 PM 2/1/2008, you wrote:

Capture  tow-hooks don't work well with zoom-launching techniques.
Operation of such increases pilot load during arguably the most
critical portion of a sailplane flight, seemingly causing a problem
rather than solving one.

FYI, those older  types of (nylon) hooks can bind and not release at
high line tension:  I know this because I had it happen and destroy a
plane.  (in combination with a ratcheting winch - another bad idea).

For the forgetful, perhaps a Remove-Before-Flight device (flag
connected to plug-type switch, etc.) would solve the problem.

Using such a device is a no-brainer that requires only a low-tech
approach and costs only pennies.

Ain't old age wonderful?

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Almost as good as flying

2008-02-01 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 04:56 PM 2/1/2008, you wrote:
Aw, c'mon Chuck, you know you miss it...hope to see you at the 
Gateway Open this year (June 22-23).


I don't miss the St. Louis wether.  Too cold and snow in the winter 
and too hot in the summer.  I do miss the Gateway Open but won't be 
able to make it any more.  I can still fly my models but She who must 
be obeyed wont let me drive that far alone since my stroke in 1999 
and her back problem makes driving over 4 hours too painful.   I try 
to go to contest that take no longer than 4 hours driving 
although  we did make the Nats last year by taking two days for the 7 
hour drive to Muncie.  If only the Gateway Open was at O'Fallon, IL 
instead of O'Fallon, MO.


Chuck 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Winter blues and USA F3J fundraising

2008-01-31 Thread Chuck Anderson
Good post about team expenses.   Much as I dislike the F3X events, I 
support our teams and try to make a small donation.  (Us retired 
fliers don't have Gordys resources)  I also think all donations 
should be voluntary.Another problem for AMA is the increased 
number of teams to be supported and the increased number of team 
support people. As I remember, the team we sent to the first F3B 
event in 1977 had the three fliers and a manager.   How many does it 
take now?  Maybe Skip can provide a more accurate number for that 
first team since he was there.


Chuck

At 05:35 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote:

I can contribute to this thread.  The information is not secret, it is a
published document and applies to ALL AMA supported FAI teams and there are
quite a few of them, not just F3B/J AND we constitute some of the largest
teams.  AMA contributes the following to the FAI teams:

- $400 to the team fund - this typically is allocated towards the airfare,
but can be for any team expense
- Entry Fees for all pilots, managers and support staff
- FAI registration fees
- Banquet costs for all team members
- If food is prepared and served on site by the organizers, it is paid for
- Lodging for the contest days and 1 day prior and after
(These expenses are supported as actual expenses up to 900 Swiss Francs
($832 USD) per team member - not counting the $400 for the airfare)

The US F3J team is comprised this year of 7 pilots (including Cody R. the
returning Junior WC) Junior and Senior Managers, and 4 tow people for an
entourage of 13 people.  Last cycle the AMA approved funding for the Junior
team manager and 2 separate towers for the junior team, and this cycle they
waived their normal policy and are also funding the returning junior WC (who
competed in the team selections) so you can see that the AMA is INCREASING
their overall support for F3J in particular.

Unfortunately costs are very high for this trip.  Airfares are nearly double
what the fares were to Martin last cycle, and since the flying site is quite
some distance from both the airport and the hotels we will have very high
ground transportation costs - we will need 3 large vans for all the people
and equipment.

The total budget for the trip looks like about $45K with AMA supporting
about $15K which is about the same as last cycle, so we have  huge hill to
climb.  In previous cycles the soaring community has been very generous and
we basically broke even on the last cycle. With the generosity of many
people we can hopefully raise enough funds to make the final accounting
minimally painful to the pilots and team managers (tower costs are fully
reimbursed by the team).

I also appreciate the offer of clubs adding a fee to their contests to
support the F3J team.  However, as desperately as we need the funding, I am
not a fan of taxing pilots to support our goals.  People need to support
the organizations and groups that they choose to support.  I would prefer
that clubs solicit donations at their events to support the team. I am all
for specific fundraising events where pilots attend specifically to support
the team. I will be preparing a brochure that you can print and pass out for
raffle sales, merchandise sale and donations at your events, I hope to have
that done this weekend.

I am very optimistic that our supporters will again come through and help us
send a thoroughly prepared team to Turkey with nothing to worry about except
winning the golds!!!

Thanks to all of our sponsors and supporters again

Jim Monaco
US F3J Team Manager 2008


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Mid South

2008-01-21 Thread Chuck Anderson
Wonder if they have the Soccer Moms under control this  time.  They 
didn't the last time the Mid South was in Atlanta.


Chuck

At 05:11 PM 1/21/2008, you wrote:
Yes. In Atlanta.  They (the Atlanta guys) were gonna have it here in 
Tullahoma, and then found/decided to use the Atlanta site. Brian Smith

- Original Message - From: Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: soaring@airage.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 4:46 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Mid South


I hear Mid South will be held over Memorial Day weekend. What I 
have not heard is where. Has this been decided?



Mark




Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
AOL are generally NOT in text format



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.8/1235 - Release Date: 
1/21/2008 9:39 AM


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Contests format.

2008-01-13 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 04:32 PM 1/12/2008, you wrote:

In 1971, the North Bay Soaring Society (NBSS)  hosted a three task
contest in Santa Rosa, Calif. with tasks almost identical to F3B.
Regis


The 1979 LSF Tournament in Lockport, IL also used the three  task 
format.  I flew in that one and didn't like it any better than I 
did  when I flew F3B in 1976.


Chuck 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] what are you building this winter?

2008-01-12 Thread Chuck Anderson
I have another original under way.  It is a development of the LilAn 
that I developed over the last two years but incorporating some 
things I was experimenting with 30 years ago.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re: Challenge...

2008-01-11 Thread Chuck Anderson
The original English version was fun but not the FAI version unless 
you have two healthy linebackers for towers.   And the mass launches 
are great for midairs.  Almost like watching the start of a F1 race.


Chuck Anderson

At 07:51 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:

From the FAI  web page. The second sentence fascinates me.

F3J - Thermal Duration Gliders

This class is very popular as it is a single task event with simple
rules. The competitors try to keep their models aloft for exactly 10
minutes and land as close as possible to a designated spot.

Launching the model is achieved by hand towing, where two persons with
a 150m-monofilament line pull the model.

Pilots are divided in groups, after a matrix schedule, so that during
the preliminary or qualifying rounds, they compete against as many as
possible of the other pilots. Then the top pilots fly in a single
group the Final or Fly-Off rounds, which determine the winner.


Excuse my ignorance I am new to the world of soaring. Are they
launching like this in international competition? Sounds fun.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Contests format.

2008-01-11 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 08:49 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
It's been a long time since I flew it, but Triathalon seemed like a 
challenging event for contests.  Anyone still flying that?



Ron


I think that Triathalon is the best contest event I have ever 
flown.  Modern models and superstrong launch equipment make it less 
of a challenge that it did when it was designed back in 1976 but it 
is still good.  I would like MOM better if it used triathalon scoring 
instead of normalizing scores.  I think that a great event would be 
to assign a launch time for each round for every flier before the 
contest starts but it would be impossible to run because of winch and 
weather problems.  But I can dream can't I.  :)


Chuck 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Contests format.

2008-01-11 Thread Chuck Anderson
Left out an important part of the last sentence.  Why can't  I catch 
errors like before hitting the send button.  :(

Chuck

At 08:49 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
It's been a long time since I flew it, but Triathalon seemed like a 
challenging event for contests.  Anyone still flying that?



Ron


I think that Triathalon is the best contest event I have ever 
flown.  Modern models and superstrong launch equipment make it less 
of a challenge that it did when it was designed back in 1976 but it 
is still good.  I would like MOM better if it used triathalon scoring 
instead of normalizing scores.  I think that a great event would be 
triathalon with and assigned  launch time for each round for every 
flier before the contest starts but it would be impossible to run 
because of winch and weather problems.  But I can dream can't I.  :)


Chuck  


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Contest Format

2008-01-11 Thread Chuck Anderson
This modern generation seems to think everybody has to win.  Cheat if 
necessary but win.   I don't feel that way.  Winning isn't necessary 
but competition is.  I don't look at who beat me.  I look at all the 
people I beat.  Placing 17th in unlimited at the Nats with a Sailaire 
against all the moldies was almost as good as winning and I did beat 
a lot of them.


Chuck

At 10:19 AM 1/11/2008, you wrote:
Since it seems we need to make it interesting for the next 
generation to participate in our hobby, perhaps we should just hand 
out participation ribbons to everyone?  Or perhaps the Top 3rd get a 
Blue Ribbon, Middle 3rd get Red Ribbons, and the last 3rd or 
thermalling challenged get White Ribbons.   LOL


Everybody wins and nobody should be offended.

Jeeez, what's this world coming to.


Steve


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: Delays on posts from rcgroups.com (was :RE: [RCSE] Re: Challenge...)

2008-01-09 Thread Chuck Anderson
Thanks for the screening.  I appreciate it.  And, by the way, I think 
you meant to say that screening is done to ensue that spam is NOT 
posted.  :) But I got the message.


Chuck Anderson

At 11:28 AM 1/9/2008, you wrote:

RCSE sends posts from people directly subscribed to the list immediately
to all those on the list.

If you receive RCSE through a forwarder or post from a web based forum
(such as rcgroups.com), those posts need to be screened by one of the
moderators before it will be posted to the subscribers.  This is all
done to ensure that SPAM and other off-topic posts are sent to everyone
on RCSE.  The downside is that the moderators (Mike L and myself) have
lives, and don't always get around to approving posts.  When there is a
delay, this is why.

-l


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Contest Format

2008-01-09 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 06:29 PM 1/9/2008, you wrote:
Interesting twist on seeded MoM.  But one of the things I always 
enjoyed in this contest format was getting a good burial in a contest. Jim


This is the thing I hate most about MOM.  I never liked the idea of 
shafting a fellow competitor.  It always seemed to me to be 
unethical.  The other thing I don't like about seeded MOM is 
normalizing the scores.  The idea of giving one man 1000 points for a 
flight while giving another flier half as many points for flying 
twice as long in a different group is morally wrong.  I have seen 
this happen.  In seeded MOM, normalizing isn't needed.  That's 
already done by making you fly against your peers.  Normalizing may 
be more beneficial when seeding isn't possible.


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] 14th Anniversary

2008-01-08 Thread Chuck Anderson
Today is the fourteenth anniversary of my meeting Gordy.  It was on a 
cold January day in 1995 that I got a call from Gordy Stahl.  He said 
that he was passing through and would like to meet me.  I couldn't 
remember anybody named Gordy but said OK.  I then looked into my 
records and found that a few years earlier I had sold him an early 
version of my Airfoil Plot program.


It is almost impossible to give directions to my house to anybody not 
familiar with Tullahoma so I said to give me a call when he got off 
the Interstate and I would meet him at the model airplane 
field.  Gordy was driving a pickup towing a long long trailer 
carrying some earth moving machinery.  I live way back in the woods 
on a narrow driveway but some how Gordy made it my drive without 
hitting any oak trees.  Fortunately  I have a circle drive in front 
of my house so he didn't have to turn that rig around because I 
didn't have 40 acres.


I assumed that Gordy wanted to talk about airfoils and plotting 
software but it turned out that he wanted to see my models.  I had 
just finished restoring my Corvette and my shop was still cluttered 
with car tools so most of my models were in storage and I didn't have 
anything to show.  We discussed flying and Gordy remarked that he 
didn't like contests because he didn't like spending a whole day for 
only a few flights.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Jack Benny is 39 and 2.4 is 38? Gordy Does it again !!

2007-12-26 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 08:30 AM 12/26/2007, you wrote:
2.4g for me, is very exciting, can't wait till I get one, however, I 
am not in a real big rush.
My 72 Mhz, Airtronics, Mpx 4000, and JR 9303 Stuff works very well, 
My Futuba stuff is in a box in the corner,

and I can afford to sit back and watch what shakes out of the whole mixture.


I agree with Jack except that  I have converted my backup Evo to 2.4 
in order to experiment with 2.4.  I refuse to go back to plastic 
porcupines just to get 2.4 so my only choice was to use XPS.  XPS 
does not yet offer an end plug receiver that will fit in my 
sailplanes so I have flown my XPS only in an old model that I keep 
for flight testing radio equipment.  No need to rush since my Evo 
with Hitec Superslime receivers still does everything I need and 
there are no local fliers on my frequency.  I may convert some of my 
sailplanes when suitable receivers become available but see no need 
to rush out and buy more 2.4 receivers before I have to.


Chuck  


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-24 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 01:18 PM 12/23/2007, you wrote:
So Chuck,  Tell us how the tension limiter worked and how well it 
worked. What were the good points and problems?  Could such a scheme 
be used effectively today?


The Jam/Feb 1977 issue of Sailplane contained an article by Chet 
Tuthill describing the winch system developed by Jim Robinson and 
other members of the Coffee Airfoilers model airplane club.  The 
tension limiter was a major part of that article.  The tension 
limiter was a separate base for the standard winch.  For normal 
flying, the winch was removed from the base and used  like any other winch.


The base for the winch  had a pivot just ahead of the CG of the winch 
and battery and had a microswitch at the rear of the platform.  The 
tension limiter switch was wired in series with the foot peddle.  A 
spring held the platform against the switch until line tension caused 
the platform to rock forward opening the tension limiter 
switch.  When line tension decreased, the spring forced the platform 
aft closing the switch.  The inertia of the winch and battery gave a 
very smooth pulsing when launching larger models if the contestant 
held the foot peddle down and let the winch do the pulsing.


The tension limiter proved to be very reliable and we used if for 
many years.  As usual, there ain't no free lunch.  The tension 
limiter winch took a few minutes longer to set up but the 
considerable reduction in broken lines made it worth while.  The 
tension limiter was set by attaching a 25 pound spring scale to the 
tow ring and the bolt compressing the spring was screwed down until 
the desired pull was reached with the foot peddle held down.  We 
checked the tension limiter between rounds and adjusted as necessary 
to maintain a contestant pull.   The winch and turnaround were both 
mounted on the ground so the tension usually changed as the dew on 
the grass evaporated.   Mounting the winch and turnaround off the 
ground would reduce this problem.


After a few years, we began receiving complaints about not being able 
to zoom so in order to satisfy those who came to zoom instead of 
thermal, we added a bypass switch.  If the contestant chose to bypass 
the tension limiter, NO RELAUNCHES were permitted for broken tow 
lines.  A few people had trouble taping the peddle while the tension 
limiter was cycling.  These fliers could usually get better launches 
by putting the metal to the metal and letting the tension limiter do 
the tapping.  Fliers with Oly II's and similar models didn't notice 
any difference from normal winches.


We finally got tired of listening to complaints about not being able 
to get good zooms so discontinued using the tension limiter and went 
to heavier towlines.  The original tension limiter base is still 
rusting in the weeds behind my shed in the woods behind my house.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-24 Thread Chuck Anderson
This afternoon, I went out in the woods behind my garage and dug out 
the original tension limiter winch base and brushed off the leaves to 
take some photographs.  The base is rusty and  the wiring is shot but 
could be refurbished with a little sand blasting, painting, 
and  replace the  wiring.  I posted the photos on RC Groups for those 
who would like to know what it looked like.


Chuck Anderson

At 09:50 AM 12/24/2007, you wrote:
We ran one of those in Cincinnati, for years, It was mine that I had 
built, from the plans, that I think I still have.

We quit using it for the very reasons that Chuck has stated.
I ended up giving the frame away...Damn it was 30 years ago

--
Jack Strother
Granger, IN

LSF 2948
LSF Level V  #117
LSF Official 1996 - 2004
CSS Gold


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re JW/NZ Quake

2007-12-22 Thread Chuck Anderson
I last talked to Joe at the Nats last summer.  At that time, he said 
that they would be leaving for New Zealand the week after Visalia and 
I saw that his scores at Visalia were posted on the internet.


Chuck Anderson

At 09:23 AM 12/21/2007, you wrote:

His last main event in the US was at the June XC event at Montague 
this year.  He won everything.



I'm pretty sure I saw him at Visalia this year. I could be wrong, I 
spent a lot of time at the beer tent.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re:line breaks

2007-12-22 Thread Chuck Anderson
I must agree with Brian.  My first winch used a two inch diameter 
welded aluminum drum on a standard 12 volt Ford starter motor with a 
12 volt battery.  The two inch drum didn't produce enough line speed 
to break lines so easy and we used much smaller lines.  We finally 
switched to larger drums when contestants began complaining about 
lack of power for good zooms.  What they were really complaining 
about was the lack of line speeds.  Unfortunately, the man who 
fabricated our drums is no longer with us and we never found another 
fabricator who could produce good welds and the end plates frequently 
broke.  I still have the winch I built in 1972 with the welded 
aluminum 2 inch drum.  We took it out last year and did a few 
launches and everybody was amazed at how much softer and smoother the 
launches were when compared to our standard winches.  Maybe we should 
regulate the  winch drum diameter.


Chuck Anderson

At 09:51 AM 12/21/2007, you wrote:

With all due respect I disagree Jeff.
At our local field when we launch to the north, it takes all the 
line off the drum.. We get much softer, less powerful launches.. As 
opposed to when we launch to the south we still have approximately 
half the winch line left on the drum at the time of launch and the 
launches are much more aggressive/powerful and all the broken lines 
and broken models come at the south side.. Just My observations here 
in Tullahoma.. Brian Smith

- Original Message - From: Jeff Steifel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: soaring@airage.com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: ***SPAMTAGPTD: [RCSE] Winch/Sharon


Charlie less drum diameter will lead to more line breaks. Since you 
have more torque you can now crank more turns in and break the line 
easier. -- Jeff Steifel


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-22 Thread Chuck Anderson

I did and used such a winch over 30 years ago.

Chuck Anderson


At 02:40 PM 12/21/2007, you wrote:
There have been various proposals about limiting winch current via a 
series resistor, but nobody has mentioned directly governing line tension.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Icon/High End

2007-12-13 Thread Chuck Anderson
AS my friend said when I called his Sailaire ugly,  They are all 
pretty when specked out.  But that was back in the day when soaring 
was the objective.  :)


Chuck Anderson


At 10:04 AM 12/13/2007, you wrote:
Mr. Perkins' comment, the High End is pretty, only proves the old 
adage, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  It's pretty much 
common knowledge that the days of beautiful sailplanes ended with 
the last Dodgson design.

   Jim Deck


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] 2.4 GHz

2007-12-05 Thread Chuck Anderson
I agree that the Evo is the best available transmitter for most 
sailplanes.  Since Hitec, Futaba, and JR make transmitters that are 
capable of doing what I need, my choice is based on feel and balance 
as well as programming methods.  I still remember the disgusting feel 
I had when I tried to get used to my first JR plastic porcupine 
transmitter.  Awkward feel and balance with all the switches in the 
wrong places with no way to put them where they belong.  My aluminum 
box transmitters had a much better feel and balance and I could put 
the switches where I needed rather than where someone else decided 
they should be.  My first programmable transmitter was a Micropro and 
I understood the logic behind the programming.  Never did understand 
the logic behind the random selections of buttons and the correct 
sequence to accomplish what I wanted to do in my Airtronics, Futaba, 
and Hitec transmitters and I always had to have the manual when I 
went to change anything.


In 1933, I had a booth next Karlton at Visalia and he tried to sell 
me on his pizza box transmitters but I preferred my single stick 
Micropro.  By 2001, Micropro was long out of business and I was using 
a Hitec transmitter when I had a radio problem at Visalia.  After the 
first day, Karlton talked me into trying a Cockpit  MM.  Five minutes 
into the first flight the next day, Karlton sold me a radio.  The 
Cockpit had absolutely the best feel and balance of any two stick 
transmitter I have ever used.  I promptly sold all my Futaba and 
Hitec transmitters except for one that I kept for models that needed 
more that the Cockpit could provide.  I ordered an Evo the day 
Karlton announced that he was accepting orders.  It took over a year 
but I received one of the first Evos that were imported into the US 
and I promptly sold my last Hitec.  The Evo has so much better 
ergonomics and programming than anything else available today that I 
can't see ever changing unless both my Evos quit working and new ones 
are longer available.


My backup Evo has been converted to 2.4 with XPS and test flown in 
the old model I use for  testing new and repaired radios.   I am now 
waiting for end pin receivers to convert all my models to XPS.


Chuck

PS.  I still feel the Cockpit MM has the best ergonomics of any 
transmitter I have ever flown.


At 07:09 PM 12/4/2007, you wrote:

I tried to respond to Jack Iafret's posting but got bounced by the system so
I am posting this separately. I agree with Jack that the Profi has very
powerful programming. However, I traded mine for 2 - 12 Ch Evos because, for
me, the programming is even easier, although with a few less options (most
of which I would never use), and because the Evo has a much better
geometry/weight for hand launch. I have been flying the Evo for several
years in TD, F5J, F5B, hand launch and a couple of electric sport planes and
helicopters. XPS offers a great, easy to install 2.4 GHz module for the Evo
(and Profi for that matter). I have been using the XPS 2.4 Ghz system in a
F5J Graphite with a good bit of carbon in the fuselage. It seems to work
great so far. XPS now has 8 and 10 Ch full range receivers. They are coming
out with end pin versions of these as well as top and end pin 12 Ch
receivers. For all the gliders the end pin receiver will be a very positive
addition. I won't comment on the schedule for these new receivers because
that is one of the more frustrating things about dealing with XPS. The 2.4
GHz components from XPS that I do have though work great and I get to keep
the Evo programming. I will wait a little longer for end pin receivers
before I switch to a 9303.



Bruce T.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] 2.4 GHz back in 1933

2007-12-05 Thread Chuck Anderson

Two 3s instead of two 9s sure makes a difference.  :)

Chuck

At 10:18 AM 12/5/2007, you wrote:
Wow, in 1933 it must have just been you and Karlton out in the 
middle of no where.  You guys were way ahead of the times.  LOL


Occasionally/often frustrated;
...never defeated...


 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:40:02 -0600
 To: soaring@airage.com
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] 2.4 GHz

 I agree that the Evo is the best available transmitter for most
 sailplanes. Since Hitec, Futaba, and JR make transmitters that are
 capable of doing what I need, my choice is based on feel and balance
 as well as programming methods. I still remember the disgusting feel
 I had when I tried to get used to my first JR plastic porcupine
 transmitter. Awkward feel and balance with all the switches in the
 wrong places with no way to put them where they belong. My aluminum
 box transmitters had a much better feel and balance and I could put
 the switches where I needed rather than where someone else decided
 they should be. My first programmable transmitter was a Micropro and
 I understood the logic behind the programming. Never did understand
 the logic behind the random selections of buttons and the correct
 sequence to accomplish what I wanted to do in my Airtronics, Futaba,
 and Hitec transmitters and I always had to have the manual when I
 went to change anything.

 In 1933, I had a booth next Karlton at Visalia and he tried to sell
 me on his pizza box transmitters but I preferred my single stick
 Micropro. By 2001, Micropro was long out of business and I was using
 a Hitec transmitter when I had a radio problem at Visalia. After the
 first day, Karlton talked me into trying a Cockpit MM. Five minutes
 into the first flight the next day, Karlton sold me a radio. The
 Cockpit had absolutely the best feel and balance of any two stick
 transmitter I have ever used. I promptly sold all my Futaba and
 Hitec transmitters except for one that I kept for models that needed
 more that the Cockpit could provide. I ordered an Evo the day
 Karlton announced that he was accepting orders. It took over a year
 but I received one of the first Evos that were imported into the US
 and I promptly sold my last Hitec. The Evo has so much better
 ergonomics and programming than anything else available today that I
 can't see ever changing unless both my Evos quit working and new ones
 are longer available.

 My backup Evo has been converted to 2.4 with XPS and test flown in
 the old model I use for testing new and repaired radios. I am now
 waiting for end pin receivers to convert all my models to XPS.

 Chuck

 PS. I still feel the Cockpit MM has the best ergonomics of any
 transmitter I have ever flown.

 At 07:09 PM 12/4/2007, you wrote:
 I tried to respond to Jack Iafret's posting but got bounced by 
the system so

 I am posting this separately. I agree with Jack that the Profi has very
 powerful programming. However, I traded mine for 2 - 12 Ch Evos 
because, for

 me, the programming is even easier, although with a few less options (most
 of which I would never use), and because the Evo has a much better
 geometry/weight for hand launch. I have been flying the Evo for several
 years in TD, F5J, F5B, hand launch and a couple of electric 
sport planes and
 helicopters. XPS offers a great, easy to install 2.4 GHz module 
for the Evo

 (and Profi for that matter). I have been using the XPS 2.4 Ghz system in a
 F5J Graphite with a good bit of carbon in the fuselage. It seems to work
 great so far. XPS now has 8 and 10 Ch full range receivers. They 
are coming

 out with end pin versions of these as well as top and end pin 12 Ch
 receivers. For all the gliders the end pin receiver will be a 
very positive

 addition. I won't comment on the schedule for these new receivers because
 that is one of the more frustrating things about dealing with XPS. The 2.4
 GHz components from XPS that I do have though work great and I get to keep
 the Evo programming. I will wait a little longer for end pin receivers
 before I switch to a 9303.
 
 
 
 Bruce T.
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send
 subscribe and unsubscribe requests to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME
 turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
 are generally NOT in text format

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format



--
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. 
http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_powerofwindows_112007Power 
up!


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL 

Re: [RCSE] FOR SALE Multiplex Cockpit Radio

2007-12-05 Thread Chuck Anderson
I have owned two Multiplex MM and still have one for my RES 
models.  It is my favorite radio and it would still be my primary 
sailplane radio if it only had Crow.  I wish my Evo was in the 
Cockpit MM case.


Chuck Anderson

At 07:57 PM 12/4/2007, you wrote:

BLOWING OUT THE 72Mhz Stuff  This is a cute little radio

Selling for $85 includes shipping CONUS and a great deal

 if you snooze on this one!!!  you will loose

Radio in excellent condition comes with manual and special charge 
plug to fit Sirius charger


JR/Airtronics shift

smokinjoe


Usage: Air
Channels: 7
Modulation: FM
Frequency: 72MHz
Computerized: Yes
General Specs:
- Trainer Mode: Both
- Mode Select: Yes
- 9 Models
- Model Copy
Controls and Trim:
- DigitalTrim
- Trim Reset
- Trim Memory
- 7 Channel Servo Reverse
- 1 Slide Controls
Special Functions:
- 15 Mixes
- Limited Dual Rates
- Limited Exponential
Display Warning:
- LCD Display
- Timer
Applications:
- Electric Helicopters
- Sport
- Standard Airplane
Acrobatic Functions
- Aileron Differential
- Aileron to Rudder Mixing
- Air Brake Control
- Elevon Function
- Flap to Elevator
- Flapperon Function
- V-Tail Function
Helicopter Functions
- Hover Throttle
- Idle Up
- Offsets
- Pitch Trim
- Swash Select
- Swash Throttle Mix

Joe Rodriguez
Surf City Automotive Group
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
714-322-4926


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; Benchmarks- Get Real.

2007-12-03 Thread Chuck Anderson
That is about how long it takes me to get my 132 inch span RES model 
ready to fly after I get to  the field. The model fits in my van 
ready to fly except that the outer wing panels have to be plugged in 
and taped on.  The model was designed with a 3 piece wing with a 48 
inch center wing that will fit in my van when bolted to the fuselage. 
If someone has a winch set up, it takes me longer that that  to get 
from my van to the winch.  If Brian Smith is there, he often has my 
model assembled by the time I get out of the van.  :)


Chuck

At 01:29 AM 12/3/2007, you wrote:
Everybody has good points but listen to this. I place my 2 or 3 
DLG's in the back of my minivan, assembled and ready to fly. The one 
I want to fly first is charging as I drive to the field. I get to 
the field, put my card on the board and am flying 180 seconds later.



Admitedly, sometimes there is very little low level lift, but other than that,

Beat that!


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Okay so I have two tasks left for LSF5..You?

2007-11-20 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 11:16 AM 11/20/2007, you wrote:

GR and 8 Hour... About a third of the way through the CSS Silver Program.

Lets hear about where you are in your tasks to complete LSF5 and CSS.

Those of you at other levels, start your own thread :-)
Gordy
Louisville, nice weather today, warm, light winds.


One fourth the way through Level V since 1996 and I will stay 
there.  Completed level V wins in 1996 but will never stand on a 
slope for 8 hours so won't bother with the 2 hour thermal and goal and return.


 I knew that I would not stand on a slope for 8 hours when I started 
back in 1972 so I quit trying after achieving level IV in 1976.  I 
didn't try for the level V wins but they just happened in the next 20 
years.  What I remember most about those 20 years was when I won, 
there were less than 20 contestants and when there were over 20 
contestants, I had a lot of seconds.  Since I had no intention of 
completing level V, I didn't worry about it.  It was all for fun anyway.


Chuck 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] I Beat Gordy - Tangerine 06 Buttons....IF Huntsville, Tullahoma, Georgia,VA,

2006-11-04 Thread Chuck Anderson

All plus I don't like driving on I75 on holiday weekends.

Chuck Anderson

At 08:50 AM 11/4/2006, you wrote:

What are you saying Chuck?
Don't like driving 12 hours?  Don't like traveling through 
Atlanta?  Or Don't like Man on Man?  :-)


Steve


At 02:13 PM 11/3/2006, Chuck Anderson wrote:

At 10:55 AM 11/3/2006, you wrote:

Hi guys,
I'll be talking to Ben Wilson (inventor publisher of the coveted 
world wide I Beat Gordy buttons)...to cook some special edition 
buttons for the Florida Tangerine ChampionshipBUT I am on a 
quest to get my 20+ man contests in for my LSF5 journey


SO I need everyone to come!

This is a Man on Man, Seeded, RES, 2m, Unlimited event with a 
special added mini event at the enda Fly Off!  Simple L4 
landings, so what not to gas up for?


Come on USA, make your plan for the weekend following Thanksgiving!

Yes you too John Stone, and Bubba, and Randy and Clevelands and 
Chuck and well everyone!


See you there!


Gordy

Sorry but I won't be driving 12 hours on I75 through Atlanta on a 
holiday weekend to fly on a man on man contest.


Chuck

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] I Beat Gordy - Tangerine 06 Buttons....IF Huntsville, Tullahoma, Georgia,VA,

2006-11-03 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 10:55 AM 11/3/2006, you wrote:

Hi guys,
I'll be talking to Ben Wilson (inventor publisher of the coveted 
world wide I Beat Gordy buttons)...to cook some special edition 
buttons for the Florida Tangerine ChampionshipBUT I am on a 
quest to get my 20+ man contests in for my LSF5 journey


SO I need everyone to come!

This is a Man on Man, Seeded, RES, 2m, Unlimited event with a 
special added mini event at the enda Fly Off!  Simple L4 
landings, so what not to gas up for?


Come on USA, make your plan for the weekend following Thanksgiving!

Yes you too John Stone, and Bubba, and Randy and Clevelands and 
Chuck and well everyone!


See you there!


Gordy

Sorry but I won't be driving 12 hours on I75 through Atlanta on a 
holiday weekend to fly on a man on man contest.


Chuck


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Lithium Ion batteries

2006-10-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
Why do so many people want to put a fire bomb in a transmitter or in 
a model other than electric?  The NiMh batteries in my Evo will last 
about four times longer than I will ever fly in one day.  If, by 
chance, I do fly longer than normal, then I will simply recharge the 
transmitter with the SiriusCharge mounted in my van.  In fact, I 
normally use the SiriusCharge to charge my transmitter and model on 
the way to the field so I always start with a full charge.  I haven't 
been  very happy with the service I have gotten with the NiMh and 
Li-ion batteries in my cameras and computers so I have decided to 
stick to Nicads for my model and replace the NiMh battery in my Evo 
with  a 1100 mah Nicad battery when the existing battery dies.  I 
will only have enough battery to fly three times more than normal but 
I can live with that.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Lithium Ion batteries

2006-10-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
I first used Nicads in a model in 1963 and in my transmitters shortly 
after.  I have plug and forget chargers and battery testers for my 
equipment.  I have no need for more advanced technology that can 
start fires if misused.  Anything that stores power has the potential 
of starting a fire but Nicads can't fuel the fire.  If I have a need 
for new technology, then I will use it but I see no need to use 
something just because it is new technology.  After all, I was using 
Nicads for my airborne power packs long before most modelers.


Chuck Anderson

t 01:47 PM 10/20/2006, you wrote:

An accurate statement would be why do folks not follow instructions, and use
due diligence with new technology? It certainly is not the battery or packs
fault when they fail...


Simon Van Leeuwen
PnP Systems - The E-Harness of Choice
Radius Systems
Cogito Ergo Zoom


Quoting Chuck Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Why do so many people want to put a fire bomb in a transmitter or in
 a model other than electric?  The NiMh batteries in my Evo will last
 about four times longer than I will ever fly in one day.  If, by
 chance, I do fly longer than normal, then I will simply recharge the
 transmitter with the SiriusCharge mounted in my van.  In fact, I
 normally use the SiriusCharge to charge my transmitter and model on
 the way to the field so I always start with a full charge.  I haven't
 been  very happy with the service I have gotten with the NiMh and
 Li-ion batteries in my cameras and computers so I have decided to
 stick to Nicads for my model and replace the NiMh battery in my Evo
 with  a 1100 mah Nicad battery when the existing battery dies.  I
 will only have enough battery to fly three times more than normal but
 I can live with that.

 Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re: Stopwatch Recommendation

2006-10-19 Thread Chuck Anderson
I don't worry about it.  :-)  I don't think I have flown more than 
one or two such contests in the last 20  years.  Back in the days 
when we flew a lot of three-for-15, the final round was the 
only  time we had to worry about odd target times was in the last 
round.  When I had fly an odd target time, I adjusted the 30 second 
key point and flew a normal pattern without a countdown.  In those 
days, I could normally hit  the target time within 2 or 3 seconds 
without a countdown if I hit the 30 second point.  Since then, my 
landing skills have decreased and the competition is much better so I 
still don't have to worry about hitting the target time.  :-)


Chuck Anderson


At 10:37 AM 10/19/2006, you wrote:
What happens when you have to do a time like 6:53?  Such as a 
contest where an add up total flight time occurs.  Our yearly 
Turkey shoot because of a weighted time formula, target times do 
not necessarily end up on the whole minute.


Steve Meyer
SOAR
LSF IV


At 05:42 PM 10/17/2006, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Glad I don't have a problem finding a stopwatch.  I don't fly hand 
launch and I don't countdown for the landing.  Thirty five years 
ago, we didn't have fancy countdown watches so I learned to land 
counting up for the last minute.  My landing pattern is opposite 
the touchdown point at 30, turn base at 40, roll out on final at 
50, and touch down at 60.  I paid $6 for my last stopwatch at Walmart.  :-)


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
AOL are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Full Range Spread Spektrum, the DX7

2006-10-19 Thread Chuck Anderson
Have you noticed that all the Holiday Inn experts on those forums 
have shut since he demonstrated them at a recent event.


Chuck Anderson

At 03:38 PM 10/19/2006, you wrote:
Yep. He is all over several forums. He maintains that his system is 
the be all, end all of SS. As of today the only public demonstration 
has been in a foamy and a 29% Giles (electric). He makes some 
fascinating claims but as of yet has not provided any real proof 
beyond his own unverified claims.


Jack Dubich wrote:

Has anyone seen or heard of Extreme Power Systems.
www.extremepowersystems.net


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Own a Multiplex Radio?

2006-10-19 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 07:23 PM 10/19/2006, you wrote:

Jim,
 I am also a Hitec/Multiplex dealer, and I have good pricing and service


 :-)
George


And the best charger for Multiplex transmitters.  I have two, one for 
my van and one for the shop as well as a Super Test Pro for cycling 
the batteries.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re: Stopwatch Recommendation

2006-10-17 Thread Chuck Anderson
Glad I don't have a problem finding a stopwatch.  I don't fly hand 
launch and I don't countdown for the landing.  Thirty five years ago, 
we didn't have fancy countdown watches so I learned to land counting 
up for the last minute.  My landing pattern is opposite the touchdown 
point at 30, turn base at 40, roll out on final at 50, and touch down 
at 60.  I paid $6 for my last stopwatch at Walmart.  :-)


Chuck Anderson  


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Last War Story

2006-10-14 Thread Chuck Anderson
This post concludes the war stories about my experiences in flying 
while serving in the Air Force and Air National Guard.  These stories 
began almost 10 years ago when I posted a story about flying a C124 
in a strong mountain wave to a thread about mountain waves.  I am now 
out of stories.  Thanks to all the compliments I have received 
about  the stories.  At the Nats last summer, I talked to a few who 
missed part 1 of the current story.  If anyone would like a Word 
document of the complete unabridged story,  send me an email address.


This is the third  part of a story I wrote about flying target for 
training F86D pilots.  Part 1 posted here a few months ago covered 
the initial climb out to altitude and the view of the stars  on a 
moonless night above an overcast while part two  covered the actual 
high altitude intercept.  This story covers the end of the mission 
and has a little more action.  This story was extracted from a story 
I wrote titled The Face of God and took place in February, 1956.


Chuck Anderson


The second high altitude mission hand been canceled and I was ordered 
to descend to 25,000 feet to fly target for students just learning to 
fly intercepts.  Fun time was over and the real work was just starting.


The visibility was technically 5 miles in haze but I was having 
trouble seeing the fighters more than one minute to go.  Part of the 
problem was the lack of a horizon.  This required me to spend more 
time scanning instruments leaving less time for observing the 
fighters.  The fighters didn't have that problem since the radar 
scope displayed sufficient information to fly intercepts without 
reference to instruments.


One of the students was very timid and his intercepts and were always 
getting dragged into a tail chase while the other was very aggressive 
and set up ahead of the beam.  After each had completed his first 
intercept, I mentally tagged them Casper and Tiger.  On his third 
pass, Tiger got too far ahead and did not start drifting aft fast 
enough after the 20 seconds to go call.  I called off the intercept 
while rolling down and away from the fighter while Tiger pulled up 
and turned into the target as briefed to maximum miss distance.


I had trouble picking up Tiger on his next pass but finally saw him 
up just as he called 20 seconds to go.  He was way ahead of the beam 
and not drifting aft at all so I called break and started a sharp 
turn down and away from Tiger.  Tiger was still holding the same 
angle off the nose as his red wing tip light moved down while his 
green wing tip light moved up.  He wasn't pulling up as 
briefed.  Collision course!


At the last second, I pulled the stick back into my stomach and Tiger 
passed under me.  There was a sharp THUMP as Tiger's wing tip hit my 
T33 somewhere aft.  I immediately reached down and checked that I had 
removed the right seat armrest safety pin.  At least I could bail out 
if necessary.


I leveled the plane and it responded normally to control inputs.  I 
then looked out to my left and saw Tiger below me in a rolling 
dive.  I was surprised that he was still so close and realized that 
checking the seat pin and leveling the airplane had only taken a 
couple of seconds.  My first impression was that Tiger was going 
in!  Just as this thought flashed through my mind, Tiger stopped 
rolling and leveled off.


I turned my attention back to my own plane and set about evaluating 
the damage.  I throttled back and slowed to 175 knots.  There were no 
unusual vibrations or noise and the airplane response to control 
inputs was normal.  So far, so good but I know Tiger hit me.  Is the 
tail hanging on by a single bolt or what?


The controller was issuing instructions to set us up for the next 
intercept when Tiger informed him that we just had a midair 
collision!  Control then asked about my status.  I responded that the 
airplane appeared to be flying normally so far.  The controller then 
gave me the heading for Tyndall and ask me to contact Tyndall 
Approach Control.  Approach asked me to confirm that I had an 
emergency.  I said that I had an emergency with unknown damage from a 
mid-air collision.  Approach then wanted to know if I had performed a 
controllability check.  I replied negative and said that everything 
felt normal and to stand by for a controllability check.


Gear and flaps up or down for the controllability check?  Tiger had 
passed just under my right wing but I had no way of knowing where he 
hit my plane or if there was any damage to the wing flaps or landing 
gear doors.  Also, I didn't want to retract the gear once it was 
down.  Therefore, I decided to do a clean controllability check and 
execute a no flap landing.  I reduced power and let the airspeed 
slowly decay to 140 knots.  That's slow enough!  I can do a no flaps 
landing at that speed if required.  Then I advanced power until the 
airspeed was back up to 175 knots and informed approach control of my 
intention

Re: [RCSE] What if LSF had been born on the East coast..

2006-09-17 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 05:50 AM 9/17/2006, you wrote:
The contests were definitely more attainable then.  My first CASA 
Open contest at the Polo Field had over 100 pilots.  That was only 
10 years ago.   I got many of my contest points at the monthly CASA 
contest at Manassas Battlefield.  Now finding even 10 pilots for a 
monthly contest anywhere in VA is nearly impossible.  Winning a 
monthly club contest was a lot easier than the ESL or a NATS.


T


Don't forget that the LSF was formed in the late 60's and there were 
fewer real experts back then.  We were all beginners.I was 
thinking of the slope and cross country tasks.   All were definitely 
doable in the East  but would the members of the ECSS have set a 
different set of tasks more suited to East coast conditions there 
rather than slope sites like Tory Pines and the wide open spaces of 
much of California?   Much of what is now Silicon Valley was still 
farms and orchards as late as 1970.  I remember flying pattern ships 
on a model field near the Lockheed Missile Plant there. 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Oh What A Ride, Extra 300 That Is

2006-09-14 Thread Chuck Anderson

  I really enjoyed this.

Chuck

At 10:10 PM 9/14/2006, you wrote:
For the purests that are discussing the LSF right now, sorry, I have 
to write about this.  For the rest of us that are bored stiff, 
something to read.


I work for a company that sells a lot of Klein Tools, like we are 
the second/third largest distributors in the U.S.  Well, if you have 
not seen it, KT sponsors a gentleman by the name of Michael Mancuso, 
who lives on Long Island and flies an Extra 300 at events and many 
of the IRL races the KT's also has a large vested interest in.  You 
can find info on Mike at www.mmairshow.com and you can see the ship there.


Well last fall, my two direct bosses got to take about 15 minute 
rides each in the ship in SC and had a great time, they new I was 
very jealous.  There time frame was short so there was no way I 
could get there.  Well, our KT rep said that if I was going to be 
where Mike was this summer sometime, to let him know and he would 
see what he could do to get me a ride.  Well, the SOAR guys Fred 
contest was the same weekend as the IRL race in Joliet IL and I 
checked to see if I could go.  Well, after about a month of waiting, 
the Tuesday before the Fred, the call came to meet Mike at Joliet 
Airport on Friday at 1:00.  I was there at 11:00 to make sure.


About 12:15 he overflew the field and then made the approach and 
landed, I met them on the ramp at shutdown, his first words were, 
You're not ready or anything are you ?  Well, duh!  Well, we shot 
the stuff for a while talking about my flying background, RC 
soaring, and my father.  A young man was with him and he asked Mike 
if he wanted the stick out of the front seat, he said no and I knew 
this was shaping up real well.  We took off to the east, and he 
said, do you know where your field is that you are flying at, I said 
sure and he said take it and take us there.  The contest was to be 
held west of Plainfield IL so we moved to PLF and then west and in 
nothing flat were over the field.  Well, there were a few cars down 
there and I could see a winch and a ship or two on the ground, 
nothing in the air.  I said this was the place and he said are you 
ready for some stuff, of course I said.  There is no formal 
aerobatic box in the area and Mike said this was as good a place as any.


Well, off we went, four point roll, immelemens, loops, full roll 
rate rolls, eight points, tail slides, snaps, 6G pulls all with the 
smoke on.  My guts were going everywhere, but holding 
together.  After what seemed like a lot of stuff, he told me to take 
it back and catch my breath, then he let me do a roll, and full 
rudder turn.  Compared to the pitch and roll axis, the yaw axis took 
a lot of umph, the other two, you could breath that way and it was 
going there.  The ship flies very nice and is not twitchy per se, 
but it definately has major authority in power and pitch and 
roll.  After about 30 minutes of flying, he told to head back to 
Joliet and I figured he would take the ship somewhere along the 
way.  We kept on going, I asked if he wanted a me to set up on a 
left down wind, it was an afirmative and to get to 1700' indicated 
pattern altitude.  So I kept on trucking and when we had passed the 
end of the active and nothing was said, I went ahead and started a 
turn to base and final.  About 2/3 of the way around Mike comes on a 
says to start feeding in some right rudder, for a slip ( a pretty 
major one by my experiences) and he told to me maintain 90 indicated 
on final approach.  At this point I am still thinking he is going to 
take the ship finally, I have never even been close to landing a 
tail dragger in my life, much less land anything in years.  We keep 
on going and at about 50' he tells to let off the rudder and start a 
flair and we preoceeded to make a full stall landing touching down 
on the tail whell first.  Mike took it back when he applied the 
brakes an that was the end of my ride.


We pulled up to the ops building and shut down, standing up and 
stepping off the ship was the only time I felt like I could have 
blown the load, but I just took my time and we all proceeded to the 
building.  It took about 5-6 hours to feel somewhat normal again, 
when you are not in shape for it, aero hurts a bit.  We talked for a 
while more and then they took off for University Airport in Boling 
Brook where they were hangered for the weekend.


After they left, I went out to the field to see if the guys were 
still there, you get a recording of the flight on DVD, but something 
like this is way better if your buds see it.  Rich and Pat were 
there and I asked if anything cool had happened, Oh nothing much 
and said really, and then Rich saw me smile and he said that was you 
wasn't and I said yes.  He said there was no way that someone that 
did not know about them would have done that right over their heads, 
and I said I wanted to let them in on my fun.


Mike asked me if I had always wanted a ride in a 300 

[RCSE] LSF Discussion

2006-09-13 Thread Chuck Anderson
I have been following this discussion with 
interest and some good ideas have been advanced, 
however I have seen no discussion of the two most 
important items.  Who will do the work and how 
will it be financed.  I have been a member of LSF 
since 1972 and joined the old East Coast Soaring 
Society about the same time.  I have observed the 
troubles encountered by both 
organizations.  Perhaps a little history will 
help some of the younger generation understand my concerns.


LSF was founded in 1969 by a lCalifornia group 
after an earlier attempt had failed.  It was a 
volunteer group that had no dues or funding 
source other than a request for postage stamps 
and entry fees from an LSF tournament.  LSF 
rapidly expanded to a world wide organization 
that soon led to burnout of the founding 
group.  In 1973, control of the LSF was passed to 
Dan Pruss and others around Chicago IL.  Things 
struggled along until Dan’s death in 1986 and the 
LSF also almost died shortly after.


Bob Steel rescued the records and, with Mike 
Stump, Cal Posthuma and a few other dedicated 
Midwest LSF members, revived the LSF.  They also 
revived the LSF tournament in 1992 to finance the 
LSF.  The last LSF tournament was held at Muncie 
in 1994.  Mike Stump worked out an agreement with 
AMA to run the Soaring events at the AMA Nats 
starting in 1995 and share income from the entry 
fees.  LSF finally had finally solved the funding problem.


Prior to 1976, soaring was not an official AMA 
event.  In 1973, AMA established a Soaring 
Advisory Committee to establish soaring as an 
official event.  The Soaring Advisory Committee 
recognized the National Soaring Society (formally 
East Coast  Soaring Society) as the soaring 
special interest group in 1974 and turned over 
most of it’s functions to that group.  NSS soon 
ran into the same problems as LSF:  Worker 
burnout and finances.  Finally, in 1995, NSS 
could not run the soaring events at the Nats so 
that lead to Mike Stump’s agreement with AMA for 
LSF to run the soaring events at the Nats and share the revenue.


I ask my question again.  How do they propose to 
run and finance the program, or do they expect to parasite off LSF?


Chuck Andeson
LSF 586 Level IV
ECSS/NSS 72-361
AMA Soaring Advisory Committee 1983-1985
NSS District V VP 1985-1987
NSS  Treasurer 1988
1989 – presentno office and never again.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] What if LSF had been born on the East coast..

2006-09-13 Thread Chuck Anderson
What would  the tasks have been if LSF had been born on the East 
Coast?  LSF was formed as a local California group to promote 
sailplane flying back in 1969 and the achievement tasks were 
developed to suit local conditions that allowed long thermal flights, 
long slope flights, and lots of wide open spaces for cross 
country.  At that time, the other major group promoting soaring was 
the East Coast Soaring Society.   Imagine what tasks ECSS  would have 
developed  for  the weak lift, wooded hills and tree lined roads 
of  Pennsylvania, New York, and New England.


Chuck Anderson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] JW Comes in Last in Masters ...roster!

2006-09-07 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:08 AM 9/7/2006, you wrote:

Wow!

Build it and they will come certainly applies to this list of hooligans! :-)

Even Doug Pike is signed up to make the trek from hose'r country eh?

This is gonna be a heck of a party!

Got my room locked in!
Gordy


Nice list.  I was amazed to see that I know and have flown with most 
of them.  Yes, even Gordy.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] LSF Discussion

2006-09-07 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 11:13 PM 9/7/2006, you wrote:
snip

These DO NOT have to be a blood and guts type of contest, merely an
opportunity to fly together, thereby learning from each other and improving
the overall skill level.  When the other local flyers see how much fun is
being had they will join in, even if they KNOW they have not a whisper of a
chance to win.  They are there because it's FUN.  And, this does not require
a $2,000 moldie and a $600+ computer radio - it can be done with a 'lowly'
Gentle Lady, Spirit, Aspire or HOB 2 x 4.


I think that's what is wrong with so many current contests with the 
emphasis on win, win, win and not enough emphasis on fun.  Why not 
back off a little and put some fun back.  Fly events that don't 
require a moldie.  Maybe a round of three-for-fifteen and a few 
rounds of two minute precision.  That's how I learned to land on the 
spot on time  over 30 years ago and it can be done with an Oly II or 
Gentle Lady.  And be sure to have a Novice class with best trophies 
for them.  I have been flying contests on one type or another since 
1950 and I don't really care for another trophy unless it is for a 
really important contest.  For the rest, just announce my name if I 
place.  Of course I don't have to worry about that very often any more. :-)


Chuck Anderson

   
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] LSF discussion

2006-09-06 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 11:08 PM 9/5/2006, you wrote:
OK, probably most members of RCSE are aware of it but, for those who 
aren't, a good discussion concerning the LSF is taking place in 
Sailplane Talk on RCGroups.  Both members  non-members of the LSF 
may find it interesting.


Here we go again with the same old discussion for the umpteenth time 
by the same people who want awards without doing the work to run such 
a program.  Let somebody else do it and they will reap the 
rewards.   Rode this Mary-go-around too many times.


One thing this discussion has done was to liven up RCSE.  Things were 
getting so slow I was thinking of posting part 3 of my last war story.


Chuck Andeson LSF IV LSF583, NSS 72,361 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re:Really practical ideas

2006-09-02 Thread Chuck Anderson

Would you also award bonus points for appropriate clothing?  :-)

At 09:02 PM 9/2/2006, you wrote:

This is REALLY GREAT. I further suggest that we offer free entry to well
endowed young ladies, be they novice or expert.


From time to time, the topic of attracting new flyers  into competition
has been batted about on this forum.  A hearty Well  Done to the Long
Island Silent Flyers for a very practical solution -  quoting from their
recent posting:
New to the contests are the Novice  class, and Novices can register for
FREE.
Under 18 and Over 65 are also  free for other classes.  Note that it not
only attracts new blood but  also entices those of us with tired, old blood.
May their endeavor be  successful and spark a new  trend.
Jim  Deck

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re:[RCSE] Great Ideas

2006-08-15 Thread Chuck Anderson
While we are discussing great ideas, why doesn't anybody build a 
switch harness with a better charge plug.  The servo plugs most of 
them use for connecting the charger are totally inadequate for any 
application where they are frequently connected and 
disconnected.  Ever have one short out and melt in your hand while 
plugging in the charger? I have on more than one  occasion. Like 
Minnie Pearls brother inspecting hot horseshoes, I didn't hold on 
very long. :-)  Trouble was some of the melted plastic stuck to my 
fingers.  :-(


The best switch harness I have ever used came with my last Evo.  I 
bought Karlton Spindel's last Evo and he threw in  two extra switch 
harnesses.  About the only fault I have found is that it is so 
big.  The switch is about the same size as a Hitec 225 servo.  One 
lead has a standard plug for connecting to the receiver while the 
other lead has a hefty plug that matches Multiplex batteries.  There 
is no charge lead.  Instead, the charger plugs into the switch with 
the same connector as used for the battery.  Since I don't use 
Multiplex batteries, I cut off the battery plug and install a 
standard battery connector.  I used  the Multiplex battery plug to 
make an adaptor for my Sirius Charge charger.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] MS Outlook question

2006-08-14 Thread Chuck Anderson
A little over 20 years ago, I wrote an airfoil plot program for the 
Commodore 64.  I soon ported it to the Atari, TRS80, and other 
computers using the 6502 computer chip except for the Apple 
II.  Apple, in it's infinite wisdom, crippled the operating system so 
that basic programs could not send graphics to printers without 
special machine language routines.  I soon ported the program to 
MS-DOS computers and even to the original 128k Mac.  The only 
computer that had trouble running my program was the Mac.  Every 
month or so, Apple would issue an upgrade to the Mac operating system 
that required changes to my program. By 1988, I decided that I was 
selling enough programs to justify purchasing a real computer and 
evaluated everyone that I could afford.  The choices boiled down to 
the second generation Mac, the Amiga with the MS-DOS option, and a 
Gateway 2000.  I really didn't like the Mac that much and didn't like 
Apple's record of abandoning users of their earlier computers. 
(Applle III, Lisa, and the 128K Mac).  Cost ruled out the  Amiga so I 
wound up buying the very  first Gateway 2000.  I have never regretted 
the decision because  the programs II  wrote for the first Gateway 
will still run on my new Dell computer.  I can also use most of the 
software I bought over the last 20 years.


Chuck Anderson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Some thoughts on the Nats

2006-08-12 Thread Chuck Anderson
 to do this.   Or is there 
more to generating a flight order than we are told.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Nats Scores

2006-08-03 Thread Chuck Anderson
Are all the scores from the Nats posted anywhere?   Some people would 
like to know where they finished and need the data to fill out the 
LSF achievement form.  Not me since I finished Level V contest 
requirements 10 years ago.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] After the 2006 NATS - 2 Meter Comments

2006-08-02 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 11:25 PM 7/31/2006, you wrote:
snip

 I am not sure just when the 2 meter
class became codified.  There was only one class at the first LSF
contest (1971) - held at the Nelson glider ranch, Livermore, Ca.
BTW, that same year, an early form of f3b was  flown at the NBSS
contest in Santa Rosa, Ca.  Regis


I am not sure when the 2-meter class was codified.  I first flew 
2-meter at the LSF Tournament  at Lockport, IL in 1979 and was the 
first contest for the Winglet Spica.  In 1980 and 1981, 2-meter event 
was still unofficial and flown the day after Standard Class and 
Unlimited.  In 1983, 2-meter was flown at the same time as Standard 
and Unlimited.   I remember it well as I flew all three classes with 
the Spica by changing the wing tips between classes.  I am not sure 
about  1982 but think it was an official event since it was not flown 
after the Nats was over.  I have a photo of Carl Goldberg talking to 
me about winglets as I was changing from the winglets to the standard 
class wing tips for the next flight.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] 2M Rambles

2006-08-01 Thread Chuck Anderson
At last!  An interesting discussion.  Reminds me of the good old days 
or RCSE from about 10 years ago.  I have a notebook full of posts 
about stability and control from1995 to1998.  Lots more interesting 
than what happened, or didn't happen, at the latest contest.  I had a 
lot of success flying a low aspect ratio model in 2-meter with the 
Winglet Spica.  It's first contest was in the 1979 LSF Tournament at 
Lockport, IL.  It was the only model I flew in 2-meter contest until 
I retired it after the 1998 Nats after 20 years of service.  In the 
early years, it had no competition while by 1998 it was no 
competition.  I did complete my Level 5 contest requirements with the 
Winglet Spica in 1996 with a win in Unlimited and high point for the 
contest.  I had to fly the Spica after damaging my Unlimited model 
before the start of the contest.


I am surprised that nobody has mentioned using winglets for 2-meter 
models.  The Winglet Spica had a 10 ich chord wing with 10 inch high 
winglets and had the same performance as the same model with 100 inch 
wing span and almost as good as it had with a 115 inch span 
wing.  There ain't no free lunch and the large winglets had two major 
disadvantages.  Winglets are a one speed device and the winglets are 
sensitive to wind gusts when landing.  The very large winglets and 
wide chord wing did make the model much easier to see and I never had 
trouble identifying my model in a thermal with a lot of others.  :-)


snip

I've broken up with multiple women in the last few
months... need to do enough models to keep up with the
naming process... ;-)

Possibly Lil Beeotch - we'll see

D

snip

If I used Daryl's method of naming my models, I wouldn't have 
many.  Tomorrow is my 49th wedding anniversary.


Chuck Anderson  
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] After the 2006 NATS - 2 Meter Comments

2006-07-31 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 10:40 AM 7/31/2006, you wrote:

The real question is why fly different classes in the first place?.  If
the tasks are all the same, then why change to planes that have less
functionality or lower capability? Even F3J contests are just TD 
with a man tow.  So why are there

different events for the same thing?


LSF first divided soaring into two classes sometime before 1973.  By 
1973, the SOAR Nats had grown so large that they decided to adopt the 
LSF class system in order to award more trophies without awarding 
trophies so far down the list.  After all, a fourth  place trophy 
sounds better than a 10th place trophy for the same score.  As I 
remember, 100 inch span was chosen because about half the fliers had 
models with wing spans over 100 inches and there were a lot of kits 
with wing spans between 90 and 100 inches on the market.  At least 
that was the explanation given when the SOAR Nats established 
standard class as models with wing spans up to 100 inches according 
to an article published in Sailplane.  I could look it up but I am 
too lazy to search my collection of Sailplane magazines.  :-)


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Some thoughts on the Nats

2006-07-30 Thread Chuck Anderson
Just a few more thoughts on the Nats.  I agree with everything Jim 
and Marc said.  This was the smoothest Nats I have attended and I 
have been to a lot of them.  I flew my first Nats at the old SOAR 
Nats in 1974 and have not missed one since except when my job 
prevented me from getting off long enough and I haven't missed a one 
since I retired.  I do have a couple of minor complaints.


First, the landing spot was dangerously close to the safety 
line.  There is no reason for the spot to be closer than 25 feet from 
the safety line.


Second, the landing spots were not directly behind the corresponding 
winch.  This is more of a problem for me since I started using a cane 
to walk on uneven ground.  On the last round of RES, I launched from 
a winch on the left site of the tent and my landing spot was on the 
other side.  Walking that far while trying to fly my model was difficult.


Third, we need to allow late entry if there is an open frequency.  I 
know of at least two people who would have entered RES if they could 
have entered after they arrived for Unlimited.  I used late entry to 
fly in several Nats before I retired.  I I had no trouble getting 
time off to fly contest except when I had a test in the wind 
tunnel.  In 1983, I didn't enter because I had a long test scheduled 
just before the test and I didn't know if I would be finished in time 
to drive to Springfield, Massitutes.  At noon on Friday before the 
Soaring event started, I realized that If I worked late I could 
finish the final report by noon on Saturday.  I left Tullahoma at 
noon on Saturday and drove to Springfield arriving just before the 4 
PM Sunday late entry deadline.  Flying started the next morning and I 
was able to enter 2-meter, Standard, and Unlimited.  We flew all 
three classes each day and I actually won a trophy in 
2-meter.   Since the flight order is computer generated, there is no 
reason  we couldn't allow late entry and raise a little more money 
with late entry fees.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Another War Story

2006-07-23 Thread Chuck Anderson
I have received requests for more stories about my flying 
experiences.  Since there hasn't been much activity on RCSE lately, 
this seemed an appropriate time to post another story.  This is 
actually the second part of a story I wrote about flying target for 
training F86D pilots.  Part 1 posted here a few months ago covered 
the initial climb out to altitude and the view of the stars  on a 
moonless night above an overcast.  This part covers the actual high 
altitude intercept.  Part three will cover the end of the mission and 
has a little more action.  This story was extracted from a story I 
wrote titled The Face of God.   This story took place in February, 1956.


Chuck Anderson

TARGET

After reaching 42,000 feet altitude, Control put me in a holding 
pattern over Albany Georgia until the fighters were airborne.  Fox 
Flight was the call sign of the first group of fighters.  Fox 1 and 2 
were students getting their final check ride in night intercepts 
while Fox 3 was the instructor monitoring his students by 
radar.  Control was directing Fox 1 while Fox 2 and 3 were holding 
position five miles apart using their own radar.  Control then turned 
me towards the target while the fighter string climbed out in the 
opposite direction on a parallel track offset about 30 miles to the 
east.  The target, Panama City, laws about 200 miles ahead.


When Fox 1 called level at Angles 42, Fox flight was at my altitude 
and about 30 miles ahead but I still couldn't see him.  The stars 
were visible all the way to the horizon and the aircraft lights 
blended right in.  When Fox 1 was about 15 miles away the controller 
turned Fox flight to its final attack vector 90 degrees to my 
heading.  All three airplanes simultaneously turned to the final 
attack heading.  If all went well, they would cross my path at 
45-second intervals.


 The afterburner flames became visible at my 10 o'clock position as 
they turned perpendicular to my flight path so I gave a Tallyho to 
tell control I had the fighters in sight.  Fox flight  followed with 
their Tallyhos as they locked on.  The controller then gave Fox 
flight the heading to turn to after completing their passes.  Fox 
flight now completed the attack using the F86D radar.


Fox 1 called 20 seconds to go and began to drift aft as his fire 
control system switched from a collision course to a lead collision 
course.  As soon as I was satisfied that we were not on a collision 
course, I cleared Fox 1 to complete the pass.  If I had not been 
satisfied that the pass was safe then I would have called Break and 
started a standard break away maneuver.  I would turn down and away 
from the fighter while the fighter would break up and towards 
me.  This maneuver was designed to maximize the miss distance for 
most situations.  Following procedures was most important since the 
rate of closure between the target and fighter was over 800 mph and 
the miss distance was less than 500 feet.


Fox 1 was drifting aft at a nice rate and would pass well to my 
rear.  Fox 1's afterburner flame was blue white and streamed out far 
behind the aircraft.  It made the aircraft easy to see on high 
altitude missions.  Flying target was much more challenging at 
altitudes below 25,000 feet where the F86D was not running in 
afterburner.  There, only the aircraft lights were visible and the 
F86D was much harder to pick up early in the intercept.


As soon as each F86D completed their intercept, they turned left 45 
degrees set up for another pass.   Each fighter was supposed to have 
two passes to shoot down the enemy bomber before he had a chance to 
drop his bomb.  The fighters didn't have much of a speed advantage 
over the target and it was hard to get far enough ahead for a second 
pass before the bomb release point.


We had a sharp controller and Fox flight completed the second pass 
before I reached the theoretical bomb release point.  After the last 
pass was completed, I turned back towards Albany for another 
intercept and resumed my stargazing while the controller vectored Fox 
flight for a radar recovery at Tyndall AFB.  I had been airborne 
almost an hour and a half and had sufficient fuel for at least 
another hour and a half.  On the other hand, the F86s had been 
airborne only about 30 minutes were almost out of fuel.  Afterburners 
are exceptionally fuel greedy and the high altitude missions were 
afterburner all the way.



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Re:JR Scan Select receiver feedback

2006-07-09 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 01:43 PM 7/9/2006, you wrote:

Got one a week or so ago and the range check was about 1/2 that of a  Hitec
Super Slim in identical setups.  Now I am in a quandry as I don't know
whether the Hitec is that good or do I have a defective JR.  It's been a
few months but as I recall I got similar results comparing a Shadow 3 to
the Hitec.  I relegated the Shadow to an electric that doesn't get very far
away.  Really frustrating as I would like a good small synth rx to go with
the Evo.
Tom Finch


Thomas Finch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EarthLink Revolves Around You.


I have been testing a Hitec Fusion 9 receiver in an old sailplane to 
see if it can replace my trusty Super Slim.  So far, everything looks 
good (except for the price).   Ground range check with the antenna 
collapsed completely inside the case is almost identical to the Super 
Slim.  I have the crystal controlled Evo so being synthesized isn't 
of any value right now.  When I get around to replacing the Super 
Slims, I may have a reason for getting a synthesized module for my Evos.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Hitec Fusion 9 Channel IPD RX's...tested and flown.

2006-07-09 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 02:50 PM 7/9/2006, you wrote:
snip

I really like the Fusion, it fits in the plane nicely and is very 
easy to program, AND you can use a Polk Remote program button ...if 
you don't want to have to poke in to the case for the Set Button.
About a month or two of flying on it so farin Gordy years that's 
equal to most you guys flying it for a year :)

Gordy


Just what is the Polk Remote program button and how do I get one 
without buying a Polk receiver.


On antenna extension .  I always have at least one section of the 
antenna extended whenever the transmitter is on except when range 
checking. Learned about this the hard way about 40 years ago with my 
first Microavionics transmitter.   I have trouble walking far enough 
to range check with one section of the antenna extended.


Chuck

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] First RC model

2006-07-03 Thread Chuck Anderson
I learned to fly RC in 1956 flying a Berkeley Bootstraps powered by 
an OK Cub 14 with a Lorenz two tube superregen receiver driving a 
Southwest Magnetic Actuator.  Somehow the model survived until I got 
out of t he Air Force and I still have it.


When I resumed RC modeling in 1963, I became enamored with a gull 
wing power pod sailplane published in Flying Models.  It was an 
unstable beast and frequently fell into an unrecoverable spiral 
dive.  The club expert took the transmitter and said Let me show you 
how to fly.  He promptly spiraled it into the ground and handed the 
transmitter back to me without saying a word.  I decided that I could 
design a better one so I did.  The result was the Tern published in 
the May, 1967 RCM.


The Tern used a Controlaire 5 receiver and I retired it to hang from 
my shop ceiling when CB radio made the superregin receiver 
unusable.  In 1970, I had replaced my first proportional radio system 
and was looking for something to do with the Microavonics radio. I 
remembered the fun I had searching for thermals with the Tern so I 
build another one large enough to house the giant Orbit servos and 
called it the Tern II.  It originally had a Cox TD 09 in the 
nose.  When we started using winches, the engine was replaced with a 
nose cone and a lot of lead to become my first true sailplane.


By 1974, the Tern had evolved to the Tern IV which won a first place 
trophy in Standard class and placed 8th overall at the SOAR Nats that year.


All of the models described here (except the unstable gull wing 
monster) still exist but not in flyable condition.  The Tern IV could 
be refurbished but the wing spars aren't strong enough for modern 
winches.  Ironically, the Tern IV is not eligible to fly in nostalgia 
even though it has a 1974 first place Nats trophy because it was 
never published or kitted.


Chuck Anderson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Silicone

2006-06-22 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 05:53 PM 6/22/2006, you wrote:
Silicone II is the worst caulk I've ever used. (I got it free after 
rebate at HD)  I used it on my house in some places, and it took 
forever to cure, did not smooth out well and was not very good.   I 
had to pull it all out. It came off easily in one long strip.  I 
went back to good old acrylic caulk and standard silicone.


I use goop for my servos.  In planes with the servo area reinforced, 
I just put packing tape around them, sand the tape a bit, put a 
dollop of marine goop on and wiggle it in place.  Great on carbon 
and glass, but not for foam.  For that, I just tape up the servo and 
use two part liquid foam.  A little goes a long way.  Great for 
holding control rods in the fuse also. You can get some at BP (Balsa Products)

http://www.bphobbies.com/view.asp?id=V907984pid=U221687
Tom


I have no problem with Silicone for installing servos.  I use a 
strange new device called screws.  :-).  Sorry but I couldn't resist.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Looking for a 2-M

2006-06-21 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 05:01 PM 6/21/2006, you wrote:
In a message dated 6/21/2006 4:23:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

That could open up a day for XC every year instead of every two.  Tired eyes
can see a big plane

My 2 meter models are ready to go!  Too bad you old guys cannot 
fly small, fast sailplanes!


Don Richmond
San Diego, CA (Virginia Beach, VA today)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hilaunch.com


I can still fly small fast planes but only by keeping them close 
enough to see which doesn't work too well for thermal soaring tasks.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Tangerine Soaring Championship - Nov. 25th 26th

2006-06-21 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 12:24 PM 6/21/2006, you wrote:

Tangerine Pre-Announcement

Its early yet but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on 
Tangerine2006 to be held in Orlando, Florida November 25th and 
26th.  (Weekend after Thanksgiving Day)


This year we will be running the contest in a seeded Man-on-man format.



Sorry to hear that you will be using seeded man on man format this 
year.  I will probably be in Tampa that weekend visiting my 
daughter's family but won't bother to drive over to Orlando for a 
seeded man-on-man contest.   I have fond memories of the original 
Tangerine when it was held on December 30 and 31 and was a truly 
national contest second only to the SOAR Nats drawing snowbird fliers 
from all over snow country as far west as Colorado along with many 
contestants from Texas.


Chuck Anderson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Looking for a 2-M

2006-06-21 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 10:54 PM 6/21/2006, you wrote:
You guys just need to explore low aspect ratio design so you can see 
the plane. I doubt if an 8:1 2M is much harder to see than a 16:1 
unlimited. Hide radio in tapered wing.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format



I have.  I flew my  Winglet Spica in 2-meter at every Nats I attended 
between 1979 and 1998,  It had an aspect ratio of 7.8 and 10 inch 
high winglets.   I do not fly it anymore because it is so hard to see 
compared to my Sailaire or Compulsion.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Multiplex Cockpit

2006-06-03 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 07:30 AM 6/3/2006, you wrote:
Anyone on the exchange using the Multiplex Cockpit who  can give me 
pros and cons for the radio.

Thanks
EDG
Pittsburgh


I have owned two and consider the Cockpit to be the best  two-stick 
transmitter I have ever owned.  It's only shortcoming was  the lack 
of a free mixer and a 600 mah battery.  I really like the feel and 
balance and would still be using it if it had even one free mix for 
crow.  All the other fancy stuff I could live without.  I bought my 
first Cockpit  in 2001 and promptly sold all my other transmitters 
except for one for my full house sailplane.  I placed my order for an 
Evo the day it was announced.  My only disappointment with the Evo is 
that it is so much bigger and heavier than the Cockpit.  I now have 
two Evos and a Cockpit for my RES sailplanes.  My backup Cockpit was 
sold to a fellow club member who is still using it.  He liked it so 
much that he bought another for a backup.  The Cockpit was overpriced 
when new but good used ones can be had at a very reasonable price and 
Ernie is available for service.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] RE: Soaring V1 #7609

2006-05-10 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 10:18 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:

Misty Meadows is near Solon Iowa which is between Iowa City and Cedar
Rapids. On a larger scale it is 200 miles west of Chicago, 250 miles
north of St. Louis and 300 miles south of Minneapolis.
And 600 miles Northwest of Tullahoma, TN  which is too far to go to a 
contest but I did manage to schedule a trip to South Dakota on his 
contest weekend back in 2001.  I don't fly HL or 2-Meter so could 
only fly on Sunday.  It was very windy with a SE wind over 15 
mph.  Landing downslope over the hill to the spot at the edge of the 
pond was a real challenge and I was able to work slope lift on final 
for almost another minute on one flight.  I actually got on the spot 
on every flight but on one flight, the wind picked up the model and 
flipped it inverted before I could get to it.  A line of 
thunderstorms approaching at noon prompted me to get an early start 
to South Dakota.


I have always scheduled trips to coincide with contests whenever 
possible.  It is always fun to visit and see all the different flying 
sites.  Gordy has it right.  Schedule travel to visit as many 
contests as possible.  They are all fun and you can meet the most 
interesting people.


Chuck Anderson 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Nats Memories (War story)

2006-05-02 Thread Chuck Anderson
In 1974, I attended my first SOAR Nats and have attended either the 
AMA Nats or the LSF Tournament every year since then except when I 
couldn't get off from work.  I retired in 1994 and bought a lap top 
computer and a van for travel to contests.  Since that time, I have 
kept a log of my experiences at the Nats.   This is a slightly edited 
copy of my log from the 1994 LSF tournament.  That was the first 
contest held at the new AMA field at Muncie.  I had just encountered 
the first of my vision problems that had caused me to sell my Shadow 
to Johnny Berlin and restricted me to flying a Sailaire.


Chuck Anderson

Monday.
Arrived at the AMA flying site at 1 PM.  Hand launched was almost 
finished.  Found good tent site right next to Louisville Club.  Right 
at home since I was a member of that club briefly in the Mid 
1980's.  First impression of the site is good.  Adequate gravel 
parking lots in good locations.  The glider site is on a small knoll 
facing southwest.  Wind is out of the southwest and forecast to 
remain there.  LSF crew is setting up AMA tent and putting out winches.


Tuesday First day of 2-meter.
Wind is out of north.  Everyone is busy moving winches, tents, 
etc.  Decided to leave my tent setup since forecast is for wind to be 
from the South.  Did not start until almost noon but still managed to 
get in 4 rounds of 2 meter.  Had radio problems and did not fly 4th round.


Wednesday.  Second day of 2-meter
Wind still out of north.  Left tent on hill and flew out of 
van.  Radio problems appear to be fixed.  Problem was in switch 
wiring.  Plugged battery directly into receiver seemed to fix 
problem.  Flew much better but still had problems seeing 
model.  Extremely cold so bought an LSF jacket.  It was too big but 
kept me warm.


HL Golf was held after flying at a golf course just east of the AMA 
flying site.  I was hoping to find something to eat as I was getting 
very hungry.   No luck.  It was just a golf course without even a 
snack bar.  Decided to skip the golf and try to find a better place to eat.


Thursday.  First day of Unlimited
8 AM   Sitting in the van watching it rain and listening to the 
thunder rumble.  Ain't we having fun.   Michael Selig is here.  First 
time I have seen him since he came to Tullahoma to fly in our contest 
about 10 years ago.  He was flying a prototype of his new Opus 
Sailplane that Sal Defransisco will be selling.  Looks very good but 
almost anything Michael flies looks good.  Talked to him briefly 
about his new airfoil for RPV's. that was written up in Aviation Week 
a couple of weeks ago.


Everybody leaving parking lot and heading back to Museum .  Discussed 
future of LSF Na;ts with Mike Stump.  He will run LSF for another 
year and hopes to have the LSF Nats firmly established by then so he 
can turn it over to someone else.


10 AM.  Everybody heading back out to the field..  Erected tent and 
assembled model.  Started raining just as I finished checking 
in.  Disassembled model and put it back in van.


1 PM  Sitting in van watching rain.  it has been raining for an 
hour.  Set up under tent and demoed plot programs to several people 
including Skip Miller.  Skip seemed interested but has a Mac. Moved 
back to van when rain started blowing too much.


Don Edberg showed me how he converted a rental compact car into a 
model carrier by folding down a back seat that didn't originally fold down.


Finally got in one round of 7 minute between showers.  7.03 and slid 
out of landing circle.


Friday.  Second day of Unlimited
  Finally started almost on time.  Cloudy with low ceilings but 
flyable.  Good zoom disappears in clouds. Sailaire disappeared in 
cloud just after launch.  Lost approximately 100 ft with spoilers to 
get out of cloud.  6:47 and no landing.. Didn't make it back to 
landing area.  Contest went down hill from there.  Landed out twice 
because I did not allow for big sink on final.  One nice thing 
though.  I flew with Fred Weaver in one round.  Don Vickers later 
told me that Fred wasn't happy about flying against that Gas 
Bag.   He didn't know that I couldn't see the model well enough to 
get out to where the lift was.  I was launching high enough for an 
easy max on all flights but there was sink around the hill near the 
landing areas.


After the flying was over, the CD assembled all the models and pilots 
for photographs by a flier that had an electric model rigged up to 
take aerial pictures.  This delayed trophy handouts for 15 
minutes.  After the camera plane landed, it was discovered that the 
camera hadn't worked.


Banquet was held at the Roberts Hotel downtown.  I was late and most 
tables were occupied except for two that had reserved signs.   The 
Louisville club was also late but didn't let the reserved sign deter 
them.  When the waiter didn't know who the table was reserved for, 
they decided that it was reserved for us.  After the meal had 
started, Luther Mitchell and Herk Stokely came

[RCSE] LSF World Soaring Masters

2006-05-01 Thread Chuck Anderson
Since the contest is restricted to LSF member and LSF is a world wide 
organization, I see no problem in calling it a World Soaring Masters 
contest.  LSF has also had a number of Soaring Masters contests in the past.


Chuck Anderson LSF 583 Level IV  (ain't gonna stand on no slope for 8 hours)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Guaranteed World Soaring Masters....

2006-04-12 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 05:51 PM 4/12/2006, you wrote:


Guys... we're barely getting over 150 open class
competitors at Visalia these days you really think
there will be significantly more than 150 guys trying
to go to... dare I say it Muncie? Or as Karen puts
it... MoonSay
Given a choice, I'll take Visalia.  I prefer a contest that is a 
better balance between flying and fun.  I have always wished for a 
Visalia East close enough to drive to but this isn't it.  I would go 
back to Visalia but after my  recent experiences with the Terminal 
Stupid Asses, I don't fly anywhere unless  I have to and I don't have 
to go to a contest.  I'm still trying to talk my wife into taking a 
leisurely three week driving tour of the country between here and 
California some September and October.  If Don Richmond can drive 
across the country so often, I don't see why we couldn't.


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] NATS registrations

2006-04-02 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 07:38 PM 4/2/2006, you wrote:



 Well boys, daylight savings time has arrived, it's April, 

Remember, Indiana finally got with the world and is changing their clocks,
so we will have an extra hour of sun in Muncie this summer.  Gives guys lots
of after hours flying time and Gordy can shoot more landing in preperation
for that Nats plaque.   Also, to back up what Barry has said, I know that
many schedules finalize in the last minute, but if you know you are coming
go ahead and help Barry out and get that entry in.  That means you
Siebanaler, git-r-done!

Marc Gellart
Nats ED


 I hope the Nats doesn't use the extra hour of daylight to fly 
another round.  Last year, the first day of Unlimited ran so long 
that I had trouble landing in the last round because of the setting 
sun was blinding me.  I was so exhausted that I canceled the planned 
supper with friends and ate a hamburger in the motel after 9 
PM.   There is more to the Nats than flying.  I prefer the way 
Visalia runs their contest.  It is a better balance of flying and partying.


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Robert L Scott

2006-03-01 Thread Chuck Anderson
Tonight, I found that Robert L. Scott, the author of God Is My 
Copilot, just died.  He was one of my heros that I got to meet, even 
if only for a few minutes.  The following is a story about meeting 
him that I wrote a couple of years ago.


Chuck Anderson

When I was in elementary school, I read two books that had a 
significant influence on my life.  The first was I Wanted Wings by 
Bernie Ley and the other was God Is my Copilot by Colonel Robert L. 
Scott.  God Is My Copilot was made into a very poor movie with some 
good flying scenes that I enjoyed in spite of the stupid 
script.  Col. Scott built and flew model airplanes during WW I and 
even built a hang glider that he promptly crashed into a thorn 
bush.  I tried to emulate his model flying but skipped the glider part.


Robert L Scott graduated from West Point the year I was born but, 
strange as it seems, our Air Force careers overlapped.  General Scott 
retired from the Air Force in October 1957 while I completed my tour 
of active duty in January 1958.


I have owned a paper back copy of God Is My Copilot since the early 
50s and read it many times.  In 1990, I found a 1943 first edition of 
God Is My Copilot in a used bookstore in San Angelo, Texas.  I had 
heard that General Scott had retired to his hometown of Macon, GA and 
spent a lot of time in the Aviation Museum at Robins AFB.  I always 
stop at every aviation museum I pass but never managed to get to the 
one at Robins AFB until November 2002.  I stopped in for a couple of 
hours and was surprised at the number of airplanes on display.  They 
even had one of every plane I flew in my 26 years in the Air Force, 
Air Force Reserve, and Air National Guard.


When I arrived, I ask about General Scott and was told that he was in 
that day but had gone to lunch.  He was over 90 years old and I was 
surprised to find he was still active in the museum.  I waited around 
until General Scott returned.  A tall slender gray-haired man entered 
and I finally got to meet a hero that had such a great influence in 
my life.  He retired as a General but to me, he will always be 
Colonel Robert L. Scott of the Flying Tigers.


Now my 1943 original edition of God is my Copilot is autographed by the author.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Carbon Supra #48 flies - weight 61 oz !

2006-02-23 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:23 PM 2/21/2006, Mark Drela wrote:


The all-moving Supra stab is aerodynamically balanced,
so the stab servo loads from the airload are minimal.

The only loads the stab servo will see is due to the
inertial load when the boom cracks the whip in the zoom.


That is one of the reasons my stabs pivot around the rear wire.  I 
also clamp  the stab to the front wire with very small wheel 
collars.  I never lose a stab in flight and the weight of the front 
wire and wheel collars almost balances the stab about the pivot. 
Clamping the front wire to the horn also means that the weight of the 
stab horn also contributes to balancing the stab about the pivot.   I 
then sweep the stab as necessary to put the pivot at  25% MAC.  I 
started doing this back in 1974 to reduce the chances of stab 
flutter.  Those obsessed with minimizing weight could leave off the 
wheel collars and still reduce the inertia loads.  :-)


Chuck Anderson

PS The stab sweep also helps me identify my model in a gaggle. :-)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] The First Synthesized TX Module

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:43 AM 2/21/2006, you wrote:
Sorry guys, neither Hitec or Futaba was the first.  Kraft had the 
earliest version that I know of, in the 1979-1980 time frame.  It 
was affectionatley termed dial-a-crash after the notion that a 
forgetful or malicious person could dial in a frequency that caused 
another to crash.  This was in the days of only 8 frequencies.  It 
was a bulky unit and didn't really catch on, and the Japanese 
invasion (Futaba, World) was occuring which pretty much doomed the 
American made radios.  There used to be a bunch: Orbit, Kraft, 
Milcott, Ace, Heathkit, etc.  Kraft as long since gone the way of 
the other RC pioneering companies.  Only one left that I am aware of 
is Ace by virtue of diversifying into other areas of RC.


Jim Thomas



I was wondering how long it would take for someone to remember 
Kraft's Dial-A-Crash system.  And the ACE we knew is gone too.  If 
they were still in business, I would still be flying Micropro Single 
Stick transmitters.


Chuck Anderson


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] The First Synthesized TX Module

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck Anderson
Since we are into reminiscing about the good old days, I witnessed 
more radio control development  than most currently active 
modelers.  I got my first radio in 1953,  It was a Berkley Aertrol 
that I paid $49 for and received a bag of resistors, condensers, 
tubes, and wire along with an escapement, transmitter case, and a 
27.255 crystal. I was in college during most of the reed era so 
missed that phase.  I watched Space Control, Sampy, and Orbit analog 
proportional systems being developed and finally managed to afford a 
1967 Microavonics system that cost a monath's take home pay.  At that 
time, a lot of the local fliers were using the first Kraft digital 
proportional system with servos using wire-wound feed pots that 
needed to be cleaned periodically.  The hot radio for pattern fliers 
in 1967 was EK until several top pattern fliers including Jim 
Kirkland, Ron Chidgney, Jim Whitley, Doc Edwards, and other top 
fliers got together and hired Jim Fostgate away from EK and set up 
Proline to develop a radio to their specifications.  The early 
Prolines were build in Athens, Alabama and was built from precision 
lab quality electronics and Ron Chidgney's stick assembly.  The 
control sticks from the Proline Competition transmitters still have 
not been equaled.


In 1969, I bought my first Proline transmitter when they were still 
in Athens Alabama 100 miles from Tullahoma,  I was flying pattern 
contests at that time and switched to single stick Prolines in 
1971.  I continued to fly Proline until 1993 when I  began flying 
full house sailplanes and needed mixers.  I flew single stick 
Micropro transmitters until 2000 when the Micropro began showing it's 
age.  I tried Futaba and Hitec but was very unhappy with the ToysRUs 
styling, awkward feel and balance, and programming that I never 
really understood.Then I discovered the Multiplex Cockpit which 
led me to the Evo.  Now if only I could get an Evo with a Chidgney 
single stick, I would never need anything more.


I still see no need for Dial-A-Crash and don't use a lot of the 
features of my Evo.   All my models are on the same channel and use 
the same setup so my models will always fly when I launch no matter 
which model I have selected.  It might not be in trim but it will at 
least be flyable.  Guess why I developed this setup. :-)  Maybe when 
I can get a cheap, reliable synthesized receiver no bigger than my 
Superslim receiver


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] AG36 Coordinates

2006-02-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
I have been looking at the Bubble Dancer airfoils but am unable to 
find coordinates for AG35, AG36, AG37 or AG38 in normal COR 
format.  Coordinates for these airfoils on the Charles River  site 
listed as COR and DAT airfoils are apparently referenced to the 
bottom surface of the airfoil instead of the chord line.  I haven't 
seen airfoil coordinates referenced to the bottom surface since the 
free flight airfoils from over 50 years ago.  Coordinates for other 
Drela airfoils that I have checked are in the normal COR format 
referenced to the chord line.


While my plot program can plot airfoils from coordinates referenced 
to the bottom of the airfoil in the old NACA format, it can't plot 
them from airfoils in COR or DAT format that are referenced to the 
bottom surface.  Daryl sent me coordinates for the AG35 airfoil in 
coordinates referenced to the chord line but I am in need of 
coordinates for the AG36 referenced to the chord line.  Anybody know 
where I can find them  in normal COR format?


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] AG36 Coordinates

2006-02-18 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 10:49 AM 2/18/2006, you wrote:

I've got them in my compufoil3d airfoil library.  Do you want me to send
them to you?

Dan Fink


Thanks for the offer but Mark Mech has already sent me a set of 
coordinates that will work with my Airfoil Plot program.  RCSE is 
great for getting information in a hurry.   I would still like to 
know why coordinates for the AG 35 series of airfoils are referenced 
to the bottom of the airfoil instead of the chord line as was done 
with all  the other Drela airfoils that I checked.


Chuck Anderson


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Super Vision without bionics

2006-02-09 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 07:43 PM 2/9/2006, you wrote:
What if you could get a pair of glasses that would double the 
distance of your vision?


http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70181-0.html



Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net


I'd settle for a pair that would give me back the vision I had 30 
years ago.  Then maybe I could get another Nats win.  :-)


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Do you like long wings?

2006-02-09 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:21 PM 2/9/2006, you wrote:

How about a 5M (195) TD model?

http://www.soaringusa.com/products/product.htm?product_id=16505category_id=259



Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net


Launching models this size is very difficult, especially if there is 
any wind.  In 1979 I designed a sailplane with a 169 inch span and 
flew it in unlimited at the 1981 and 1982 Nats.  The Dragon Lady was 
a real handful to launch in any wind and  I finally retired it from 
anything except cross country.  I launched the model myself at both 
Nats but I really needed a pit crew.   There is a photo of the Dragon 
Lady being launched in the SOAR report for the 1985 Great Race.  I 
was flying, Ed Wilson was throwing, and a team member was on each 
wing tip stabilizing the model.   That was on the first day before 
the high winds that year.  We didn't even try to fly it on the windy days.


Chuck Anderson



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE about assisted soaring, value of winning.

2006-01-23 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 08:22 PM 1/23/2006, you wrote:
snip
Please tell us. . .other than ego satisfaction, just why do you want 
to win sailplane contests? What is it that's so *essential* 
about this form of competition???


After my eye surgery in 1997, I investigated thermal sensors and gyro 
to assist me in flying my models.  After some experimenting, I found 
that the best solution was to fly large, stable models and don't let 
them get too far away.  If any thermal  sensor, gyro, or auto 
pilot  would help me to fly the model I would use them.


 Fun flies are not for me.  Any time I want to fun fly, all I have 
to do is to hook up the winch trailer and drive 15 minutes to the 
model field.  It is a lot cheaper than driving several hours and 
spending a night in a motel.   Contests are for seeing how well I am 
flying in comparison to others.  At my age and with my handicaps, 
winning is being able to fly in a contest.  Remember,  this is a HOBBY.


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Molded Supra Raw Weights

2006-01-21 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:22 AM 1/21/2006, you wrote:

smip

This message is directed to a small group of new molded supra owners, and
probably not of interest to other.

snip
On the contrary, this is exactly what I like to see on RCSE.  It is 
much more interesting than a report on sloping at the local dam or 
skying out in a thermal.  Even though I won't be buying a molded 
Supra any time soon (and probably never will), I like to read about 
what others are building, the problems they encounter, and the 
solutions to those problems.  Over the years, I have learned a lot by 
watching what others are building and the mistakes they make.  Lots 
cheaper than making them yourself.  I make enough without repeating 
mistakes others have made.  :-)


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Computer Guided Thermaling

2006-01-20 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 01:34 AM 1/20/2006, you wrote:
In a message dated 1/20/2006 1:44:50 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The old fashioned way? With a picolario stuck in your
ear? I'm sorry... but i don't remember that from the
old days

You're too young - use of telemetering audio variometers in US RC 
soaring competition goes back to about 1969-70, at least two types 
were then commercially available.  They were routinely used by a 
number of the more consistent winners.  By the mid to late '70s, 
they had about the same must have status as the latest hi $ moldie 
today!  Good Lift!


I picked up a thermal sensor from Don Clark at the 74 SOAR Nats and 
used it for a couple of years.  I found that I could do as well 
without it so stopped using it for everything except for initial 
trimming and cross country.  When I was listening to the  thermal 
sensor, I was not catching the little indications from the way the 
model was flying.  The only time I had an advantage with the thermal 
sensor was when the model was directly overhead or at extreme visual range.


Chuck Anderson


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Picalario Pixilation

2006-01-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
My copilot always handled the radios and my wife does the talking on 
the cellphone.  :-)


Chuck Anderson

At 10:09 AM 1/20/2006, you wrote:
In a message dated 1/20/2006 10:59:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if the common belief that pilots can't listen to an 
altimeter and fly RC at the same time is related to the pretty well 
proven fact that driving and talking on a cell phone is an accident 
waiting to happen.


Hang up and fly.

Tom H. Nagel

You should stay out of full size planes Tom, power or sailplanes if 
that is true !  Bill G.



Bill Grenoble
LSF 7558 IV
Hawksnest Soaring
Shermans Dale, PA


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Speaking of Insanity...RES wize that is

2006-01-18 Thread Chuck Anderson

Does it use the same stealth fuselage as the standard Ava?

Chuck Anderson

At 06:45 PM 1/18/2006, you wrote:

Hi guys,

Most of you know that I literally live to fly RES, nuthin I like 
better, other than maybe 2m and noisy little electric crap buzzing 
around while I am trying to listen to thermals :-)


However, I flew my AVA once and in a contest and manage to win. It 
was ugly flying to say the least, the cat calls and howls of 
laughter might give you an idea of just how wobbly gobbly I fly 
three channel planes


But I have only owned a Sailaire, never really flew one but always 
like the idea of having a really BIG sailplane for competitions 
etc.  When I called Barry and told him I was out of the RES game and 
had sold my AVA, he said PERFECT TIMING GORDY!I just figured 
that his wife forgot to hide the expresso again, but he continued to 
tell me about the new Super AVA147 spanso I said, what the 
hell send one over.


Anyone flown one yet?  I think it weighs something like 25ozs all up 
with 3 giant servos in it and a Picolario, LoLo, and one of 
Sheldon's battery monitor, glitch testers...at least I am sure 
that's what everyone else's will come in on their particular 
scales.  Likely I will just drop in three Volz servos, no switch, a 
Polk Seeker synth RX and 4 1250 sub c nicads.


In anycase sounds like it could be a good ship for some of the LSF 5 
work I need to do this season.


Let me know if you have one or ordered one (misery loves company:-) 
or have flown one.

Gordy
PS, Barry promised to give me his car for posting this stuff :-)


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] AG35 file format

2006-01-12 Thread Chuck Anderson
I had some time to kill and decided to look at the Bubble Dancer 
airfoils.  I downloaded the AG35.COR  from the Charles River web site 
file but the coordinates are not in any format that I recognize.  All 
the other COR airfoil files that I am familiar with  reference the Y 
coordinates to the chord line.  The AG35.COR files apparently 
reference a line through the bottom of the airfoil at the 30% 
chord.  What program uses data files in this format.  Is there a 
source for the AG35, AG36, and AG37 airfoils in true COR or DAT format?


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Best sailplane airline case?

2006-01-10 Thread Chuck Anderson
For 10 years, I carried my model to Visalia and Phoenix in an archery 
bow case.  I even built a model with a 132 inch  wing with plug in 
tips that would fit in the bow case.  It traveled as checked baggage 
and I never had any problems or model damage.  I have traveled to 
Visalia and Phoenix only once since 911.  No problem with the 
Terribly Stupid Asses on those trips but I found a better solution to 
the TSA problem.  I only go to contest close enough to drive to in 
less than 2 days.


Chuck Anderson  


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Supras done

2006-01-06 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 09:42 AM 1/5/2006, you wrote:

He who launches highest... wins...

D


Not necessarily.  As you get older, you will find that he who 
launches highest frequently loses sight of his model.


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Supra wing joiners

2005-12-29 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 07:35 PM 12/28/2005, you wrote:

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chuck Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 The bagged Supra isn't restricted to only three wing joiner
 angles.  You can bend them to any angle you desire. :-)

Chuck,

Actually, the Dr. Drela designed supra has straight carbon joiner rods
(it is a 3 peice wing).  The joiner angle is set into angled verticle
grain basswood.  So in effect, it has only one polyhedral option.

Ryan


I was referring to the Supra wing from Phil Barnes.

Chuck Andeson


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Supra wing joiners

2005-12-28 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 12:47 PM 12/28/2005, you wrote:
Another interesting aspect of the molded Supra is the wing joiner 
options.  The pilot can choose to fly 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 degree joiners.


I can see guys talking in a MoM flight line now...  How much weight 
are you packin'?   Are you using a 5 degree bend?  ;-)

Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net


The bagged Supra isn't restricted to only three wing joiner 
angles.  You can bend them to any angle you desire. :-)  Actually, I 
have found that all modern sailplanes that I have tried are grossly 
deficient in lateral stability.  Lateral stability   doesn't matter 
as long as the model is close enough to see clearly but I find  I 
need more dihedral as my eyes grow older.


Chuck Anderson  


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] An analogy (regarding Model Aviation magazine)

2005-11-02 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 07:17 AM 11/2/2005, you wrote:

Jim,

I think you are right on here. Another analogy would
be how many of us drive cars but do not take part in
competition? But many many people want to know what
has happened in competitions around the world be it
F1, Indy, LeMans, NASCAR etc.

snip

I do, or rather did in my younger days.  I also no longer fly real 
airplanes but it (and racing) are still a part of my life even though 
I no longer participate except as a spectator.  I also still  enjoy 
reading about free flight, control line, scale, and all the other 
phases of model airplanes that I have enjoyed over the 
years.  Therefore, I am unhappy with the decline in the content of 
Model Aviation,  I used to read most of the columns in Model 
Aviation.  I have picked up a lot of ideas from them that have been 
useful in other types of models.  Now most of these columns are gone.


Alas, Model Aviation has followed the trend to slick up and dumb down 
the magazine for the illiterate generation.  Lots of color pictures 
printed on glossy paper that is hard to read because of the glare and 
no drawings, schematics, and technical details of the models.  Even 
the District Vice President's column has degenerated into nothing but 
pictures of clubs in their districts.  I used to spend several hours 
reading Model Aviation.  I spent less than 10 minutes reading the 
last issue on Model Aviation because there was only three articles 
that included any technical content.  I had my own roll-up spray 
booth over 30 years ago, I have been carving wing tips from balsa 
blocks for over 60 years, and I no longer build scale models that 
need louvers so these articles didn't take long to scan.


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: Re: [RCSE] Nats Issue and AMA ED

2005-10-31 Thread Chuck Anderson
I remember hearing somewhere that  AMA has had some members stopping 
in wanting to fly at the AMA site but were disappointed that they 
were denied because there was an official event on the site.  Don't 
remember where I heard this.  I have certainly never heard of any 
problems with local fliers complaining about not being able to fly at 
the AMA site.


I can understand why many sailplane fliers don't want anything to do 
with contest the way most of  them are conducted today.  We seem to 
have two types of sailplane fliers.  Those who only want to fly MOM 
and those who want nothing to do with contests.  How about a contest 
somewhere in between MOM and fun flying.  Used to be a lot of them 
but not any more.  :-(


Chuck Anderson 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Grumblings of an old man.

2005-10-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
Where did you get this information.   AMA cannot make changes.  Only 
AMA members can submit rules change proposals.  Then the change only 
becomes official after the Contest Board votes to approve it in a 
preliminary vote and again in a final vote.  I just received the 
proposed changes to Soaring rules today for the 2007 rules change 
cycle and there was no proposal to change the class names in any of 
them.  Summaries of all the proposals are published on the AMA web site.


Chuck Anderson
District V Soaring Contest Board member

At 01:35 PM 10/18/2005, you wrote:

There is not an Open class sailplane any longer.   The Open 
sailplane class name was changed to Standard.  My guess is that the 
AMA changed the name to eliminate any confusion with the Junior, 
Senior and Open classes, which refer to the pilot's age.  But, by 
all means, let's call the Unlimited class Open and perpetuate the 
confusion.  Maybe Unlimited is too long of a word. When someone says 
they have an Open class sailplane, are they referring to the old 
Standard class or is it one that can only be flown by someone 19 or older?


It's disheartening when CDs of contests and vendors don't call 
sailplane classes by their proper names.  A multiple age class 
contest with multiple sailplane classes should say:


Junior:Unlimited, RES
Senior:   Unlimited, RES
Open:Unlimited, RES, 2 Meter

Or something similar.



George MeyersWD6EQS
AMA 2750
Fresno, California

Graduierte, schule der harten klopfen
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


  1   2   3   >