[RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-21 Thread schrederman

If you come to my contest, you'll be launching on 180# line and if you
break it, you'll fly it. Just because you have no skill, just brute
strength, is not my problem, either. So who says we have to cater to
your HIGHER line strength needs. There is something in the rule book
about the CD settting the rules of a particular contest. If I have
everyone showing up with ICON 8s or whatever, 300# line is what I need
to provide. My suggestion of 180# line doesn't actually cater to
anyone. It's still too heavy for lots of models. It's actually strong
enough to launch your Icon or my Onyx JW. The real world is that not
everyone wants the latest carbon gobbler to fall out of the tree... so
DUUUHHH!!! yourself. Wake up ... it ain't all about you.


-- 
schrederman

schrederman's Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=13218
View this thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=788570

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-21 Thread ivanbrian
This was too cute Jack.. I tried to reply privately, but your mail is 
bouncing.. Brian Smith

\


: schrederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: soaring@airage.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:14 PM
Subject: [RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist





DUUUHHH!!! yourself. Wake up ... it ain't all about you.


--
schrederman


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-20 Thread chris
This is all Bogus, What is everyone getting their lines in a Twist?

No where does it say that a CD must provide launching mechanisms for
specific plane designs.

What is the problem???  A CD provides a launch method that can launch
all planes.  Just because the same launching system cannot get 2Meter
planes launched high is not his problem.

The Airbus is only the Airbus because GE, or whomever, makes a engine
that can power the plane.  So what if the little planes cannot travel
across the great herring pond as efficiently as the big ones.

Heck, if the line breaks, just get bigger lines or stronger lines.  In
Fishing they use wire lines to met the stronger requirements.  What's
the problem here, can't the old Icon 1 or the Sharon , or perhaps the
High End have better winches for them to use?  You can also use
clothesline rope if you want.

There is nothing in any rule book that says lighter lines need be
provided.  So, buck it up and get a better launching plane.  Get rid of
that old NOS  or woodie class and come into the REAL world.

I am sick of everyone thinking that we have to cater to the lighter
planes.  If the Icon 1 can't launch on the new winches, then get off
your tails and get a plane that can launch.

This is so bogus to hear  everyone complain.  Look at all the
aerodynamic and composite advancements, and use them.

Duu.

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, December 20, 2007 9:08 am
 To: soaring@airage.com

 In a message dated 12/20/2007 8:48:45 AM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I'm sure this will be a very dynamic plane and competitive with the Euro
 models. My concern is the launching equipment. With the current crop of 
 moldies,
 line breaks and winch bogging and ultimate failure are becoming more 
 prevelant.
  Heavy enough line for these new super ships, will be a burden for the
 lighter planes. Yes, I've CD'd lots of contests and a few big ones.

 We've tried some heavy line and it is great for the heavier planes but the
 lighter planes and 2 meters have a helluva time overcoming the line drag and
 weight.

 Where do we draw the line?

 Darwin N. Barrie
 Chandler AZ

 

 It could be that the wing area is not more than the Sharon, just a higher
 aspect ratio, and that it won't generate more lift, but will just have less 
 drag
 and be more efficient.

 Bill Wingstedt




 **See AOL's top rated recipes
 (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop000304)
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-20 Thread Darwin N. Barrie

Chris,

It is much more than throwing on heavier line. We experimented with  
heavier line. It does not give in the launch and many will have  
difficulties adapting at first. Secondly, and the most critical,  the  
reels are maxed out. We cannot go to much bigger line because the  
reels will have to be changed out for larger ones. Or, use a  
turnaround 300' out!! That would be popular.


I can tell you it is very frustrating to run a big contest and have  
everything from a Sleazy Glider to a 140+ plane to launch. Throw in  
the fact that there are some people out there that winning is so  
important that they will go for it all even if it breaks a line.  
These are usually the notorious sandbaggers too!!!


Darwin N. Barrie
Chandler AZ
On Dec 20, 2007, at 10:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


This is all Bogus, What is everyone getting their lines in a Twist?

No where does it say that a CD must provide launching mechanisms for
specific plane designs.

What is the problem???  A CD provides a launch method that can launch
all planes.  Just because the same launching system cannot get 2Meter
planes launched high is not his problem.

The Airbus is only the Airbus because GE, or whomever, makes a engine
that can power the plane.  So what if the little planes cannot travel
across the great herring pond as efficiently as the big ones.

Heck, if the line breaks, just get bigger lines or stronger lines.  In
Fishing they use wire lines to met the stronger requirements.  What's
the problem here, can't the old Icon 1 or the Sharon , or perhaps the
High End have better winches for them to use?  You can also use
clothesline rope if you want.

There is nothing in any rule book that says lighter lines need be
provided.  So, buck it up and get a better launching plane.  Get  
rid of

that old NOS  or woodie class and come into the REAL world.

I am sick of everyone thinking that we have to cater to the lighter
planes.  If the Icon 1 can't launch on the new winches, then get off
your tails and get a plane that can launch.

This is so bogus to hear  everyone complain.  Look at all the
aerodynamic and composite advancements, and use them.

Duu.

Chris



 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, December 20, 2007 9:08 am
To: soaring@airage.com

In a message dated 12/20/2007 8:48:45 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sure this will be a very dynamic plane and competitive with  
the Euro
models. My concern is the launching equipment. With the current  
crop of moldies,
line breaks and winch bogging and ultimate failure are becoming  
more prevelant.
 Heavy enough line for these new super ships, will be a burden  
for the

lighter planes. Yes, I've CD'd lots of contests and a few big ones.

We've tried some heavy line and it is great for the heavier planes  
but the
lighter planes and 2 meters have a helluva time overcoming the  
line drag and

weight.

Where do we draw the line?

Darwin N. Barrie
Chandler AZ



It could be that the wing area is not more than the Sharon, just a  
higher
aspect ratio, and that it won't generate more lift, but will just  
have less drag

and be more efficient.

Bill Wingstedt




**See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop000304)
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send  
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe  
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.   
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are  
generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send  
subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe  
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.   
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are  
generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-20 Thread David Webb
Now we are using seriously offending terms...*#^!baggers I would stay
clear from this type of incendiary remark if I were you:) I prefer
the PC term optimal condition competitor

But I agree we can't keep increasing the line size.

On Dec 20, 2007 10:12 AM, Darwin N. Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Chris,

 It is much more than throwing on heavier line. We experimented with
 heavier line. It does not give in the launch and many will have
 difficulties adapting at first. Secondly, and the most critical,  the
 reels are maxed out. We cannot go to much bigger line because the
 reels will have to be changed out for larger ones. Or, use a
 turnaround 300' out!! That would be popular.

 I can tell you it is very frustrating to run a big contest and have
 everything from a Sleazy Glider to a 140+ plane to launch. Throw in
 the fact that there are some people out there that winning is so
 important that they will go for it all even if it breaks a line.
 These are usually the notorious sandbaggers too!!!

 Darwin N. Barrie
 Chandler AZ

 On Dec 20, 2007, at 10:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  This is all Bogus, What is everyone getting their lines in a Twist?
 
  No where does it say that a CD must provide launching mechanisms for
  specific plane designs.
 
  What is the problem???  A CD provides a launch method that can launch
  all planes.  Just because the same launching system cannot get 2Meter
  planes launched high is not his problem.
 
  The Airbus is only the Airbus because GE, or whomever, makes a engine
  that can power the plane.  So what if the little planes cannot travel
  across the great herring pond as efficiently as the big ones.
 
  Heck, if the line breaks, just get bigger lines or stronger lines.  In
  Fishing they use wire lines to met the stronger requirements.  What's
  the problem here, can't the old Icon 1 or the Sharon , or perhaps the
  High End have better winches for them to use?  You can also use
  clothesline rope if you want.
 
  There is nothing in any rule book that says lighter lines need be
  provided.  So, buck it up and get a better launching plane.  Get
  rid of
  that old NOS  or woodie class and come into the REAL world.
 
  I am sick of everyone thinking that we have to cater to the lighter
  planes.  If the Icon 1 can't launch on the new winches, then get off
  your tails and get a plane that can launch.
 
  This is so bogus to hear  everyone complain.  Look at all the
  aerodynamic and composite advancements, and use them.
 
  Duu.
 
  Chris
 
 
   Original Message 
  Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thu, December 20, 2007 9:08 am
  To: soaring@airage.com
 
  In a message dated 12/20/2007 8:48:45 AM Central Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I'm sure this will be a very dynamic plane and competitive with
  the Euro
  models. My concern is the launching equipment. With the current
  crop of moldies,
  line breaks and winch bogging and ultimate failure are becoming
  more prevelant.
   Heavy enough line for these new super ships, will be a burden
  for the
  lighter planes. Yes, I've CD'd lots of contests and a few big ones.
 
  We've tried some heavy line and it is great for the heavier planes
  but the
  lighter planes and 2 meters have a helluva time overcoming the
  line drag and
  weight.
 
  Where do we draw the line?
 
  Darwin N. Barrie
  Chandler AZ
 
  
 
  It could be that the wing area is not more than the Sharon, just a
  higher
  aspect ratio, and that it won't generate more lift, but will just
  have less drag
  and be more efficient.
 
  Bill Wingstedt
 
 
 
 
  **See AOL's top rated recipes
  (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop000304)
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe
  messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
  generally NOT in text format
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe
  messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
  generally NOT in text format

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages 

Re: [RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-20 Thread Pat McCleave
Guys,

I look at it this way.  When I get to go to a contest, I am already happy to 
not be flying and not working.  I have CD some contests myself in the past so I 
know what the CD and his crew have gone through to put the contest on so I can 
attend and I appreciate that.  The last thing I am worried about is the size of 
line they have on their club winches whether I am flying an Icon or 2 meter.  I 
go up to the line and launch.  If I break the line, I know not to push it so 
hard the next time.  I have never been denied a relaunch for a broken line so I 
have never had to just fly it out.  If I break a line, I always try to 
volunteer to help fix the next line break after my flight since it is hard to 
fix the one you just broke when you are normally sent to the next winch to get 
in line to go.  If you are flying a 2 meter and winch is strung with heavy line 
so what.  You should have the opportunity to get just as high a launch as the 
other guys flying 2 meters so what is the big deal.  Are we not really all 
doing this as way to get away from work and troubles of the day to spend 
quality time with friends.  I think it is cool that Don is coming out with a 
new plane and that we should be talking about the merits of the new plane, not 
worrying about how well the winch lines are going to hold up to it.  BTW, are 
there any pictures out there anywhere yet of this new Beast?

See Ya,

Pat McCleave
Wichita, KS


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format