Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Leendert A. Hartog 
Just never thought of having to update the license file as well, as I 
figured the MayaS 2016 file would still be valid for the SP2 as well...

Thanks for your patience, all...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

-Oorspronkelijk bericht- 
From: Maurice Patel

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 8:13 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Cool! I am glad it all worked out in the end. Sorry that you had to go 
through this.

Maurice

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. 
Hartog

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:11 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Problem solved...
After going back to registeronce and getting a new license file, there does 
appear to have been something wrong with my original license file,
dating from the time when the MayaS 2016 bundle was first released, as it 
was missing an "INCREMENT 86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F" block.

With this new license everything seems to work as expected.

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: hk-v...@iscs-i.com<mailto:hk-v...@iscs-i.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 6:23 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Cc: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")


Have you tried Autodesk's licensing parser to validate your file:

http://www.licenseparser.com/

Cheers,

Henry

On 2015-12-10 10:17, Leendert A. Hartog wrote:

Could there be something wrong with my license file?

Is there someone who could check this, where I could send my current license 
file to?


Normal "interfaced" Softimage 2015 and Maya 2016 run properly off it,

Only problem I've faced so far are the missing "2016" batch licenses...



Greetz

Leendert

AKA Hirazi Blue

Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de



-Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Maurice Patel

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:44 PM

To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>

Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")



I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so 
for the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' 
had to be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was 
the R2 version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in 
the software. The only software updates have been the service packs which 
were issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet 
identified an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are 
continuing to look into this.




Maurice Patel

Tél:  514 954-7134

Cell: 514 242-6549



-Original Message-

From: 
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com> 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>] 
On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]


Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM

To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>

Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")



I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:





https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s

uites_2016_readme_enu.htm



The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites 
and keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says 
that that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but 
"Softimage 2015 R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.


The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does 
copy the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed 
it, figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out.




Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time 
working on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s 
not the case. It would be nice though to have more information on what if 
anything makes these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might 
be.




Joey









On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, 
"softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com> 
on behalf of Leendert A. Hartog" 
<softimage-boun...@listproc.autodes

Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Leendert A. Hartog 
Problem solved...
After going back to registeronce and getting a new license file, there does 
appear to have been something wrong with my original license file, 
dating from the time when the MayaS 2016 bundle was first released, as it was 
missing an "INCREMENT 86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F" block. 
With this new license everything seems to work as expected.

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: hk-v...@iscs-i.com 
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 6:23 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
Cc: Leendert A. Hartog 
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Have you tried Autodesk's licensing parser to validate your file:

http://www.licenseparser.com/

Cheers,

Henry

On 2015-12-10 10:17, Leendert A. Hartog wrote:

Could there be something wrong with my license file?
Is there someone who could check this, where I could send my current license 
file to?
Normal "interfaced" Softimage 2015 and Maya 2016 run properly off it,
Only problem I've faced so far are the missing "2016" batch licenses...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

-Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Maurice Patel
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:44 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so for 
the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' had to 
be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was the R2 
version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in the 
software. The only software updates have been the service packs which were 
issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet identified 
an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are continuing to look 
into this.

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph 
G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:


https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s
uites_2016_readme_enu.htm

The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites and 
keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says that 
that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but "Softimage 2015 
R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.
The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does copy 
the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed it, 
figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out.

Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time working 
on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s not the case. 
It would be nice though to have more information on what if anything makes 
these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might be.

Joey




On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, "softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
Leendert A. Hartog" <softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is 
bundled with the license for Maya 2016. It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP 
weren't identical, otherwise there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two 
different versions. But I could be mistaken... Greetz Leendert AKA Hirazi Blue 
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de -Oorspronkelijk 
bericht- From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II] Sent: Wednesday, 
December 9, 2015 10:58 PM To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: RE: 
Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F") Leendert, Is your install 
base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume whatever it is it must be 
installed from a 2016 package? There was a warning somewhere that said the two 
versions should not be installed at the same time. Is it possible you have both 
installed somehow? When I run xsibatch here using the 2015 version, it tells me 
it is checking out: === 
Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0 
=== License information: 
using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F] I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed. If your 
version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it, it must be the SI 
2016 R2 ver

RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Maurice Patel 
Cool! I am glad it all worked out in the end. Sorry that you had to go through 
this.
Maurice

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:11 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Problem solved...
After going back to registeronce and getting a new license file, there does 
appear to have been something wrong with my original license file,
dating from the time when the MayaS 2016 bundle was first released, as it was 
missing an "INCREMENT 86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F" block.
With this new license everything seems to work as expected.

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: hk-v...@iscs-i.com<mailto:hk-v...@iscs-i.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 6:23 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Cc: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")


Have you tried Autodesk's licensing parser to validate your file:

http://www.licenseparser.com/

Cheers,

Henry

On 2015-12-10 10:17, Leendert A. Hartog wrote:

Could there be something wrong with my license file?

Is there someone who could check this, where I could send my current license 
file to?

Normal "interfaced" Softimage 2015 and Maya 2016 run properly off it,

Only problem I've faced so far are the missing "2016" batch licenses...



Greetz

Leendert

AKA Hirazi Blue

Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de



-Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Maurice Patel

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:44 PM

To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>

Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")



I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so for 
the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' had to 
be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was the R2 
version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in the 
software. The only software updates have been the service packs which were 
issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet identified 
an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are continuing to look 
into this.



Maurice Patel

Tél:  514 954-7134

Cell: 514 242-6549



-Original Message-

From: 
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>]
 On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM

To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>

Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")



I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:





https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s

uites_2016_readme_enu.htm



The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites and 
keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says that 
that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but "Softimage 2015 
R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.

The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does copy 
the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed it, 
figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out.



Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time working 
on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s not the case. 
It would be nice though to have more information on what if anything makes 
these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might be.



Joey









On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, 
"softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
 on behalf of Leendert A. Hartog" 
<softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
 on behalf of hirazib...@live.nl<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>> wrote:
Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is bundled with the license 
for Maya 2016. It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP weren't identical, 
otherwise there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two different versions. But 
I could be mistaken... Greetz Leendert AKA Hirazi Blue Softimage hobbyist, 
admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de -Oorspron

Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread hk-vndr 
 

Have you tried Autodesk's licensing parser to validate your file: 

http://www.licenseparser.com/ 

Cheers, 

Henry 

On 2015-12-10 10:17, Leendert A. Hartog wrote: 

> Could there be something wrong with my license file?
> Is there someone who could check this, where I could send my current license 
> file to?
> Normal "interfaced" Softimage 2015 and Maya 2016 run properly off it,
> Only problem I've faced so far are the missing "2016" batch licenses...
> 
> Greetz
> Leendert
> AKA Hirazi Blue
> Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de
> 
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Maurice Patel
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:44 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so 
> for the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' 
> had to be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was 
> the R2 version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in 
> the software. The only software updates have been the service packs which 
> were issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet 
> identified an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are 
> continuing to look into this.
> 
> Maurice Patel
> Tél: 514 954-7134
> Cell: 514 242-6549
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
> [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, 
> Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:
> 
> https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s 
> [1]
> uites_2016_readme_enu.htm
> 
> The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
> Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites 
> and keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says 
> that that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but 
> "Softimage 2015 R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.
> The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does 
> copy the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed 
> it, figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out.
> 
> Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time working 
> on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s not the 
> case. It would be nice though to have more information on what if anything 
> makes these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might be.
> 
> Joey
> 
> On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, "softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
> Leendert A. Hartog" <softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
> hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:
> Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is bundled with the license 
> for Maya 2016. It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP weren't identical, 
> otherwise there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two different versions. 
> But I could be mistaken... Greetz Leendert AKA Hirazi Blue Softimage 
> hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de -Oorspronkelijk 
> bericht- From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II] Sent: Wednesday, 
> December 9, 2015 10:58 PM To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: RE: 
> Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F") Leendert, Is your 
> install base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume whatever it is it 
> must be installed from a 2016 package? There was a warning somewhere that 
> said the two versions should not be installed at the same time. Is it 
> possible you have both installed somehow? When I run xsibatch here using the 
> 2015 version, it tells me it is checking out: 
> ===
Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0 
=== License information: 
using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F] I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed. If your 
version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it, it must be the SI 
2016 R2 version that you are trying to run? The reason I ask is that since the 
SI 2015 SP2 package is supposed to be identical (?) to the SI 2016 R2 package, 
it might be possible to uninstall the 2016 version and install the 2015 one 
that way the 2015 software might only look for licenses with &

RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Maurice Patel 
I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so for 
the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' had to 
be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was the R2 
version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in the 
software. The only software updates have been the service packs which were 
issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet identified 
an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are continuing to look 
into this.

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph 
G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:


https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s
uites_2016_readme_enu.htm

The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites and 
keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says that 
that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but "Softimage 2015 
R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.
The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does copy 
the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed it, 
figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out. 

Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time working 
on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s not the case. 
It would be nice though to have more information on what if anything makes 
these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might be.

Joey




On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, "softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
Leendert A. Hartog" <softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:

>Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is bundled with the 
>license for Maya 2016.
>It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP weren't identical, otherwise 
>there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two different versions.
>But I could be mistaken...
>
>Greetz
>Leendert
>AKA Hirazi Blue
>Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de
>
>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:58 PM
>To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
>
>Leendert,
>
>Is your install base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume 
>whatever it is it must be installed from a 2016 package?
>
>There was a warning somewhere that said the two versions should not be 
>installed at the same time. Is it possible you have both installed 
>somehow?
>
>When I run xsibatch here using the 2015 version, it tells me it is 
>checking
>out:
>
>===
> Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0
>===
>
>License information: using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F]
>
>I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed.
>
>If your version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it, 
>it must be the SI 2016 R2 version that you are trying to run?
>
>The reason I ask is that since the SI 2015 SP2 package is supposed to 
>be identical (?) to the SI 2016 R2 package, it might be possible to 
>uninstall the 2016 version and install the 2015 one that way the 2015 
>software might only look for licenses with "2015" in it. Maybe that 
>will let you get production going till the problem is sorted out?
>
>
>--
>Joey Ponthieux
>LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II) Science 
>Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI) NASA Langley Research Center 
>__
>Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not 
>represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage- 
>> boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Maurice Patel
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:35 PM
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
>>
>> No problem, If others are having similar problems and can provide 
>>more  data  it may help find a

Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II] 
I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:


https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s
uites_2016_readme_enu.htm

The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites
and keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it
says that that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but
"Softimage 2015 R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.
The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does
copy the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never
installed it, figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes
out. 

Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time
working on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s
not the case. It would be nice though to have more information on what if
anything makes these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might
be.

Joey




On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, "softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of
Leendert A. Hartog" <softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of
hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:

>Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is bundled with the
>license 
>for Maya 2016.
>It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP weren't identical,
>otherwise there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two different versions.
>But I could be mistaken...
>
>Greetz
>Leendert
>AKA Hirazi Blue
>Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de
>
>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:58 PM
>To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
>
>Leendert,
>
>Is your install base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume
>whatever 
>it is it must be installed from a 2016 package?
>
>There was a warning somewhere that said the two versions should not be
>installed at the same time. Is it possible you have both installed
>somehow?
>
>When I run xsibatch here using the 2015 version, it tells me it is
>checking 
>out:
>
>===
> Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0
>===
>
>License information: using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F]
>
>I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed.
>
>If your version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it, it
>must be the SI 2016 R2 version that you are trying to run?
>
>The reason I ask is that since the SI 2015 SP2 package is supposed to be
>identical (?) to the SI 2016 R2 package, it might be possible to
>uninstall 
>the 2016 version and install the 2015 one that way the 2015 software
>might 
>only look for licenses with "2015" in it. Maybe that will let you get
>production going till the problem is sorted out?
>
>
>--
>Joey Ponthieux
>LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II)
>Science Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI)
>NASA Langley Research Center
>__
>Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
>represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-
>> boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Maurice Patel
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:35 PM
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
>>
>> No problem, If others are having similar problems and can provide more
>> data
>> it may help find a solution faster. Hopefully we can get to the bottom
>>of 
>> this
>> quickly.
>> Maurice
>>
>> Maurice Patel
>> Tél:  514 954-7134
>> Cell: 514 242-6549
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-
>> boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:56 PM
>> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>> Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
>>
>> Sorry, I understood your mail. The point I was trying to make was that
>> others
>> should probably speak up, if they experience the same problem.
>> I understand there is nothing much you can do for me if it is a problem
>> that
>> only affects me.
>> But if there is some bug lurking in the background, mor

Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Leendert A. Hartog 

Could there be something wrong with my license file?
Is there someone who could check this, where I could send my current license 
file to?

Normal "interfaced" Softimage 2015 and Maya 2016 run properly off it,
Only problem I've faced so far are the missing "2016" batch licenses...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

-Oorspronkelijk bericht- 
From: Maurice Patel

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:44 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so 
for the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' 
had to be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was 
the R2 version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in 
the software. The only software updates have been the service packs which 
were issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet 
identified an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are 
continuing to look into this.


Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, 
Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:


https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s
uites_2016_readme_enu.htm

The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites 
and keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says 
that that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but 
"Softimage 2015 R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.
The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does 
copy the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed 
it, figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out.


Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time 
working on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s 
not the case. It would be nice though to have more information on what if 
anything makes these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might 
be.


Joey




On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, "softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
Leendert A. Hartog" <softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:



Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is bundled with the
license for Maya 2016.
It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP weren't identical, otherwise
there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two different versions.
But I could be mistaken...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:58 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Leendert,

Is your install base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume
whatever it is it must be installed from a 2016 package?

There was a warning somewhere that said the two versions should not be
installed at the same time. Is it possible you have both installed
somehow?

When I run xsibatch here using the 2015 version, it tells me it is
checking
out:

   ===
Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0
   ===

   License information: using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F]

I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed.

If your version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it,
it must be the SI 2016 R2 version that you are trying to run?

The reason I ask is that since the SI 2015 SP2 package is supposed to
be identical (?) to the SI 2016 R2 package, it might be possible to
uninstall the 2016 version and install the 2015 one that way the 2015
software might only look for licenses with "2015" in it. Maybe that
will let you get production going till the problem is sorted out?


--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II) Science
Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI) NASA Langley Research Center
__
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.


-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-
boun...@listproc.

RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-10 Thread Maurice Patel 
My normal answer to this kind of question would typically be contact support. I 
am not sure otherwise as you would need to talk to the licensing team. You 
could try the chat here. 
https://knowledge.autodesk.com/contactus/activation-registration/registering-product
maurice

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:17 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Could there be something wrong with my license file?
Is there someone who could check this, where I could send my current license 
file to?
Normal "interfaced" Softimage 2015 and Maya 2016 run properly off it, Only 
problem I've faced so far are the missing "2016" batch licenses...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Maurice Patel
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:44 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I can help clarify. There is no difference. There was no Softimage 2016 so for 
the 2016 release of the Suites and the Maya/3ds Max bundles a 'bridge' 
had to be created for Softimage 2015 to go into the new offering. This was the 
R2 version and apart from licensing requirements there was no change in the 
software. The only software updates have been the service packs which were 
issued separately. Our QA team reported today that they have not yet identified 
an issue in their tests (Batch is working) but that they are continuing to look 
into this.

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Ponthieux, Joseph 
G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:53 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I just installed 2016 ECSU and recalled seeing this in the release notes:


https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/entertainment_creation_s
uites_2016_readme_enu.htm

The Softimage Notes suggest that SI 15 and 16 are identical. I suspected 
Softimage would be renamed 2016 in order to keep it included in the suites and 
keep it's identity as a suite component for reference. Thing is it says that 
that version with the 2016 suite is not "Softimage 2016 R2" but "Softimage 2015 
R2" and that 2015 R2 only works with 2016 license keys.
The installer doesn't install it automatically as in the past, but it does copy 
the necessary installation package to do so manually. I never installed it, 
figured I'd wait till next year to see if a final SP comes out.

Looking at these notes you'd think the only thing they spend any time working 
on is FBX but all you have to do is open Maya 2016 to know that¹s not the case. 
It would be nice though to have more information on what if anything makes 
these Softimage versions any different, assuming they might be.

Joey




On 12/9/15 5:15 PM, "softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
Leendert A. Hartog" <softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com on behalf of 
hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:

>Thanks. The installed version is the R2-SP2 that is bundled with the 
>license for Maya 2016.
>It was my impression that SP2 and R2-SP weren't identical, otherwise 
>there wouldn't be a reason to distribute two different versions.
>But I could be mistaken...
>
>Greetz
>Leendert
>AKA Hirazi Blue
>Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de
>
>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:58 PM
>To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
>
>Leendert,
>
>Is your install base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume 
>whatever it is it must be installed from a 2016 package?
>
>There was a warning somewhere that said the two versions should not be 
>installed at the same time. Is it possible you have both installed 
>somehow?
>
>When I run xsibatch here using the 2015 version, it tells me it is 
>checking
>out:
>
>===
> Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0
>===
>
>License information: using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F]
>
>I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed.
>
>If your version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it, 
>it must be the SI 2016 R2 version that you

Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-09 Thread Leendert A. Hartog 
I’ve changed the title of the thread to make it more meaningful and perhaps get 
it noticed better...
Would be nice, if someone from Autodesk could look into this issue,
while the software technically is still supported.
I’m not on subscription any more,
so I have no other way to bring this to their attention...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog 
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:29 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

After having stopped the server, setting the FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS to 3 and 
running XSI.bat, all I get is the “there is no interactive network license 
(...)” error and nothing in the command window...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Stephen Blair 
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:18 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

When Softimage can get a license, you won't see anything from 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS=3 
The license manager should show what licenses are checked out.


If you really wanted to see what license Softimage interactive tries to check 
out, you'd have to stop the license server and then start Softimage with 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS set.

Softimage 2015 SP1 will cascade through the licenses like this:

Feature:   86269SFTIM_2015_0F
Feature:   86270SIECS_2015_0F
Feature:   86458SIECS_2016_0F
Feature:   863983DSMXS_2015_0F
Feature:   864733DSMXS_2016_0F
Feature:   86400MAYAS_2015_0F
Feature:   86441MAYAS_2016_0F
Feature:   86243ENCSU_2015_0F
Feature:   86435ENCSU_2016_0F
Feature:   86248ESEC_2015_0F

---
Autodesk® Softimage® 2015
---
Error: there is no interactive network license available to run Autodesk 
Softimage 2015.
Would you like to run in Standalone mode?
---
Yes   No   
---

Feature:   SFTIM_F_S





On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Leendert A. Hartog  wrote:

  The regular Softimage interface runs without errors, even started from the 
command prompt with “FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS” set to 3...

  Greetz
  Leendert
  AKA Hirazi Blue
  Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

  From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II] 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 3:27 PM
  To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
  Subject: RE: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

  The Softimage 15 R2 interface runs though, correct? Even though your license 
lists the item 86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F. Its only the batch gives the error?



  --

  Joey Ponthieux

  LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II)

  Science Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI)

  NASA Langley Research Center

  __

  Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not 

  represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.



  From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Jens Lindgren
  Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 7:29 AM
  To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
  Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"



  The Softimage that is boundled with 2016 products is called Softimage 2015 
(SP2) R2. R2 menas it will use 2016 licenses, H instead of G in product key.

  So I'm guessing you just need to get the 2016 license from AD.



  On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Leendert A. Hartog  wrote:

This is 2015 SP2 (the one bundled to MayaS 2016)



From: Leendert A. Hartog 

Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 12:53 PM

To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 

Subject: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"



Hi list,

while trying to check out a batch license, I get the following errors 
(after setting “ FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS to 3”) as attached to this mail.

Weird thing is FlexLM seems to want to check out “86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F” , 
which (due to the EOL) doesn’t exist...



Greetz

Leendert

AKA Hirazi Blue

Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de








  -- 

  Jens Lindgren

  

  VFX Supervisor & Lead TD

  Magoo 3D Studios

Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-09 Thread Leendert A. Hartog 
After having contacted Maurice Patel directly, I was informed this was the 
first time the devs heard of this issue.
My question to you all now is, does anyone else experience this problem as well?
I am not “on support” anymore, so my sole report doesn’t carry that much 
weight...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog 
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:35 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I’ve changed the title of the thread to make it more meaningful and perhaps get 
it noticed better...
Would be nice, if someone from Autodesk could look into this issue,
while the software technically is still supported.
I’m not on subscription any more,
so I have no other way to bring this to their attention...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog 
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:29 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

After having stopped the server, setting the FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS to 3 and 
running XSI.bat, all I get is the “there is no interactive network license 
(...)” error and nothing in the command window...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Stephen Blair 
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:18 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

When Softimage can get a license, you won't see anything from 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS=3 
The license manager should show what licenses are checked out.


If you really wanted to see what license Softimage interactive tries to check 
out, you'd have to stop the license server and then start Softimage with 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS set.

Softimage 2015 SP1 will cascade through the licenses like this:

Feature:   86269SFTIM_2015_0F
Feature:   86270SIECS_2015_0F
Feature:   86458SIECS_2016_0F
Feature:   863983DSMXS_2015_0F
Feature:   864733DSMXS_2016_0F
Feature:   86400MAYAS_2015_0F
Feature:   86441MAYAS_2016_0F
Feature:   86243ENCSU_2015_0F
Feature:   86435ENCSU_2016_0F
Feature:   86248ESEC_2015_0F

---
Autodesk® Softimage® 2015
---
Error: there is no interactive network license available to run Autodesk 
Softimage 2015.
Would you like to run in Standalone mode?
---
Yes   No   
---

Feature:   SFTIM_F_S





On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Leendert A. Hartog <hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:

  The regular Softimage interface runs without errors, even started from the 
command prompt with “FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS” set to 3...

  Greetz
  Leendert
  AKA Hirazi Blue
  Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

  From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II] 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 3:27 PM
  To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 
  Subject: RE: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

  The Softimage 15 R2 interface runs though, correct? Even though your license 
lists the item 86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F. Its only the batch gives the error?



  --

  Joey Ponthieux

  LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II)

  Science Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI)

  NASA Langley Research Center

  __

  Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not 

  represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.



  From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Jens Lindgren
  Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 7:29 AM
  To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
  Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"



  The Softimage that is boundled with 2016 products is called Softimage 2015 
(SP2) R2. R2 menas it will use 2016 licenses, H instead of G in product key.

  So I'm guessing you just need to get the 2016 license from AD.



  On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Leendert A. Hartog <hirazib...@live.nl> wrote:

This is 2015 SP2 (the one bundled to MayaS 2016)



From: Leendert A. Hartog 

Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 12:53 PM

To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com 

Subject: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"



Hi list,

while trying to check out a batch license, I get the following errors 
(after setting “ FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS to 3”) as attached to this mail.

Weird thing is FlexLM seems to want to check out “86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F” , 
which (due to the EOL) doesn’t exist...



Greetz

Leendert

AKA Hirazi Blue

Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de








  -- 

  Jens Lindgren

  

  VFX Supervisor & Lead TD

  Magoo 3D Studios

RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-09 Thread Maurice Patel 
No problem, If others are having similar problems and can provide more data it 
may help find a solution faster. Hopefully we can get to the bottom of this 
quickly. 
Maurice

Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

-Original Message-
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:56 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Sorry, I understood your mail. The point I was trying to make was that others 
should probably speak up, if they experience the same problem.
I understand there is nothing much you can do for me if it is a problem that 
only affects me.
But if there is some bug lurking in the background, more reports would 
undoubtably help.
Sorry for the confusion, I didn't intentionally wanted to misrepresent your 
mail to me...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Maurice Patel
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 9:32 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

Hi Leendert,

I think you misunderstood my response. My intention was not to imply that your 
report carried no weight otherwise why would we have already escalated your 
issue with the dev team, even before you contacted us?

My point was as you were not going through the normal support channels we could 
not help you if the problem is with your setup. As I mentioned in my email, we 
will keep you posted if our engineers find an issue/solution on our end.

Maurice


Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. 
Hartog
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:17 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

After having contacted Maurice Patel directly, I was informed this was the 
first time the devs heard of this issue.
My question to you all now is, does anyone else experience this problem as well?
I am not “on support” anymore, so my sole report doesn’t carry that much 
weight...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:35 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I’ve changed the title of the thread to make it more meaningful and perhaps get 
it noticed better...
Would be nice, if someone from Autodesk could look into this issue, while the 
software technically is still supported.
I’m not on subscription any more,
so I have no other way to bring this to their attention...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:29 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

After having stopped the server, setting the FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS to 3 and 
running XSI.bat, all I get is the “there is no interactive network license 
(...)” error and nothing in the command window...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Stephen Blair<mailto:stephenrbl...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:18 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

When Softimage can get a license, you won't see anything from
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS=3
The license manager should show what licenses are checked out.

If you really wanted to see what license Softimage interactive tries to check 
out, you'd have to stop the license server and then start Softimage with 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS set.

Softimage 2015 SP1 will cascade through the licenses like this:

Feature:   86269SFTIM_2015_0F
Feature:   86270SIECS_2015_0F
Feature:   86458SIECS_2016_0F
Feature:   863983DSMXS_2015_0F
Feature:   864733DSMXS_2016_0F
Feature:   86400MAYAS_2015_0F
Feature:   86441MAYAS_2016_0F
Feature:   86243ENCSU_2015_0F
Feature:   86435ENCSU_2016_0F
Feature:   86248ESEC_2015_0F

---
Autodesk® Softimage® 2015
---
Error: there is no interactive network license available to run Autodesk 
Softimage 2015.
Would you like to run in Standalone mode?
---
Yes   No
---

Feature:   SFTIM_F_S





On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Lee

RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-09 Thread Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II] 
Leendert,

Is your install base strictly Softimage or is it a suite? I presume whatever it 
is it must be installed from a 2016 package?

There was a warning somewhere that said the two versions should not be 
installed at the same time. Is it possible you have both installed somehow?

When I run xsibatch here using the 2015 version, it tells me it is checking 
out: 

===
 Autodesk Softimage 13.0.114.0
===

License information: using [86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F]

I don't have SI 2016 R2 installed.

If your version is looking to something with 2016 license code in it, it must 
be the SI 2016 R2 version that you are trying to run? 

The reason I ask is that since the SI 2015 SP2 package is supposed to be 
identical (?) to the SI 2016 R2 package, it might be possible to uninstall the 
2016 version and install the 2015 one that way the 2015 software might only 
look for licenses with "2015" in it. Maybe that will let you get production 
going till the problem is sorted out?


--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II)
Science Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI)
NASA Langley Research Center
__
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not 
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.

> -Original Message-
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-
> boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Maurice Patel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:35 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> No problem, If others are having similar problems and can provide more data
> it may help find a solution faster. Hopefully we can get to the bottom of this
> quickly.
> Maurice
> 
> Maurice Patel
> Tél:  514 954-7134
> Cell: 514 242-6549
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-
> boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:56 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> Sorry, I understood your mail. The point I was trying to make was that others
> should probably speak up, if they experience the same problem.
> I understand there is nothing much you can do for me if it is a problem that
> only affects me.
> But if there is some bug lurking in the background, more reports would
> undoubtably help.
> Sorry for the confusion, I didn't intentionally wanted to misrepresent your
> mail to me...
> 
> Greetz
> Leendert
> AKA Hirazi Blue
> Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> From: Maurice Patel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 9:32 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> Hi Leendert,
> 
> I think you misunderstood my response. My intention was not to imply that
> your report carried no weight otherwise why would we have already
> escalated your issue with the dev team, even before you contacted us?
> 
> My point was as you were not going through the normal support channels
> we could not help you if the problem is with your setup. As I mentioned in
> my email, we will keep you posted if our engineers find an issue/solution on
> our end.
> 
> Maurice
> 
> 
> Maurice Patel
> Tél:  514 954-7134
> Cell: 514 242-6549
> 
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
> [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert
> A.
> Hartog
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:17 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> After having contacted Maurice Patel directly, I was informed this was the
> first time the devs heard of this issue.
> My question to you all now is, does anyone else experience this problem as
> well?
> I am not “on support” anymore, so my sole report doesn’t carry that much
> weight...
> 
> Greetz
> Leendert
> AKA Hirazi Blue
> Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de
> 
> From: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:35 AM
> To:
> softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> >
> Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")
> 
> I’ve changed the title of the thread to make it more meaningful and perhaps
> ge

RE: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

2015-12-09 Thread Maurice Patel 
Hi Leendert,

I think you misunderstood my response. My intention was not to imply that your 
report carried no weight otherwise why would we have already escalated your 
issue with the dev team, even before you contacted us?

My point was as you were not going through the normal support channels we could 
not help you if the problem is with your setup. As I mentioned in my email, we 
will keep you posted if our engineers find an issue/solution on our end.

Maurice


Maurice Patel
Tél:  514 954-7134
Cell: 514 242-6549

From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Leendert A. Hartog
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:17 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

After having contacted Maurice Patel directly, I was informed this was the 
first time the devs heard of this issue.
My question to you all now is, does anyone else experience this problem as well?
I am not “on support” anymore, so my sole report doesn’t carry that much 
weight...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:35 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: Licensing error R2-SP2 (was ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F")

I’ve changed the title of the thread to make it more meaningful and perhaps get 
it noticed better...
Would be nice, if someone from Autodesk could look into this issue,
while the software technically is still supported.
I’m not on subscription any more,
so I have no other way to bring this to their attention...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Leendert A. Hartog<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:29 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

After having stopped the server, setting the FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS to 3 and 
running XSI.bat, all I get is the “there is no interactive network license 
(...)” error and nothing in the command window...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com & xsiforum.de

From: Stephen Blair<mailto:stephenrbl...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:18 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

When Softimage can get a license, you won't see anything from 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS=3
The license manager should show what licenses are checked out.

If you really wanted to see what license Softimage interactive tries to check 
out, you'd have to stop the license server and then start Softimage with 
FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS set.

Softimage 2015 SP1 will cascade through the licenses like this:

Feature:   86269SFTIM_2015_0F
Feature:   86270SIECS_2015_0F
Feature:   86458SIECS_2016_0F
Feature:   863983DSMXS_2015_0F
Feature:   864733DSMXS_2016_0F
Feature:   86400MAYAS_2015_0F
Feature:   86441MAYAS_2016_0F
Feature:   86243ENCSU_2015_0F
Feature:   86435ENCSU_2016_0F
Feature:   86248ESEC_2015_0F

---
Autodesk® Softimage® 2015
---
Error: there is no interactive network license available to run Autodesk 
Softimage 2015.
Would you like to run in Standalone mode?
---
Yes   No
---

Feature:   SFTIM_F_S





On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Leendert A. Hartog 
<hirazib...@live.nl<mailto:hirazib...@live.nl>> wrote:
The regular Softimage interface runs without errors, even started from the 
command prompt with “FLEXLM_DIAGNOSTICS” set to 3...

Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
Softimage hobbyist, admin at si-community.com<http://si-community.com> & 
xsiforum.de<http://xsiforum.de>

From: Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES II]<mailto:j.ponthi...@nasa.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 3:27 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: RE: ""86269SFTIMSIB_2016_0F"

The Softimage 15 R2 interface runs though, correct? Even though your license 
lists the item 86269SFTIMSIB_2015_0F. Its only the batch gives the error?

--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES II)
Science Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI)
NASA Langley Research Center
__
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.

From: 
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-bou