Tomcat EXE Source Code
Can anybody help me to get the source code of the Tomcat exe file i.e, source code of the installation exe . Thanks..
Re: CUSTOM JSP FOR APACHE SOLR
From looking at the source, I see only the following option available for me to write search results displaying jsp's: adjust SolrDispatchFilter to treat a JspResponseWriter specially by: - enriching the http-request with the search queries and reponses - forward the request down the chain It sounds bit difficult a modification of SolrDispatchFilter but it sounds to me to be useful (I would get all the webapp services in my jsp, e.g. for i18n, sessions, ...). It would also allow other implementations such as servlets. Thanks in advance to advice if it's a good or bad thing to do. paul Le 24 févr. 2011 à 23:47, Paul Libbrecht a écrit : Hello list, as suggested below, I tried to implement a custom ResponseWriter that would evaluate a JSP but that seems impossible: the HttpServletRequest and the HttpServletResponse are not available anymore. Have I missed something? Should I rather do a RequestHandler? Does anyone know an artificial way to run a JSP? (I rather not like it). thanks in advance paul Le 2 févr. 2011 à 20:42, Tomás Fernández Löbbe a écrit : Hi Paul, I don't fully understand what you want to do. The way, I think, SolrJ is intended to be used is from a client application (outside Solr). If what you want is something like what's done with Velocity I think you could implement a response writer that renders the JSP and send it on the response. Tomás On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote: Tomas, I also know velocity can be used and works well. I would be interested to a simpler way to have the objects of SOLR available in a jsp than write a custom jsp processor as a request handler; indeed, this seems to be the way solrj is expected to be used in the wiki page. Actually I migrated to velocity (which I like less than jsp) just because I did not find a response to this question. paul Le 31 janv. 2011 à 21:53, Tomás Fernández Löbbe a écrit : Hi John, you can use whatever you want for building your application, using Solr on the backend (JSP included). You should find all the information you need on Solr's wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ http://wiki.apache.org/solr/including some client libraries to easy integrate your application with Solr: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolrfor fast prototyping you could use Velocity: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/VelocityResponseWriter http://wiki.apache.org/solr/VelocityResponseWriterAnyway, I recommend you to start with Solr's tutorial: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html Good luck, http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.htmlTomás 2011/1/31 JOHN JAIRO GÓMEZ LAVERDE jjai...@hotmail.com SOLR LUCENE DEVELOPERS Hi i am new to solr and i like to make a custom search page for enterprise users in JSP that takes the results of Apache Solr. - Where i can find some useful examples for that topic ? - Is JSP the correct approach to solve mi requirement ? - If not what is the best solution to build a customize search page for my users? Thanks from South America JOHN JAIRO GOMEZ LAVERDE Bogotá - Colombia
Re: DIH regex remove email + extract url
Hi Koji,
My question was more about the solr DIH syntax. It doesn't work either
with the new regex.
Especially the syntax for this:
field column=source xpath=/product/url regex=http:\/\/(.*?)\/(.*)
/ --- Is it correct? (not the regex, the syntax)?
Example: url=http://www.abcd.com/product.php?id=324 -- i want to index
source = abcd.com
thanks for your help
Le 25/02/2011 01:43, Koji Sekiguchi a écrit :
Hi Rosa,
field column=description xpath=/product/content
regex=[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4} replaceWith= /
Shouldn't it be regex=[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-z]{2,4}?
field column=source xpath=/product/url
regex=http://(.*?)\\/(.*) /
Example: url=http://www.abcd.com/product.php?id=324 -- i want to
index source = abcd.com
Probably it could be regex=http:\/\/(.*?)\/(.*)
I use a regex web tool:
http://www.regexplanet.com/simple/index.html
Koji
Re: Ramdirectory
I have used this without issue. In the example solrconfig.xml replace
this line:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory
class=${solr.directoryFactory:solr.StandardDirectoryFactory}/
with this one:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory class=solr.RAMDirectoryFactory/
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks - yeah that is why I asked how to use it. But I still don't know
how to use it.
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/javadoc/org/apache/solr/core/
RAMDirectoryFactory.html
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465
directoryProvider class=org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory
!-- Parameters as required by the implementation --
/directoryProvider
Is that right? Examples? Options?
Where do I put that in solrconfig.xml ? Do I put it in
mainIndex/directoryProvider ?
I know that SOLR-465 is more generic, but
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-480 seems easier to use.
Thanks.
On 2/24/11 6:21 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I could not figure out how to setup the ramdirectory option in
solrconfig.XML. Does anyone have an example for 1.4?
it wasn't an option in 1.4.
as Koji had already mentioned in the other thread where you chimed in
and asked about this, it was added in the 3x branch...
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-Solr-Index-main-in-RAM-td25671
66.html
-Hoss
--
Thanks,
Matt Weber
upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
I have tried the steps indicated here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler and when I try to parse a document nothing would happen, no error.. I have copied the jar files everywhere, and nothing.. can anyone give me the steps on how to upgrade just tika, btw, currently on 1.4.1 has tika 0.4 thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/upgrading-to-Tika-0-9-on-Solr-1-4-1-tp2570526p2570526.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
LetterTokenizer + EdgeNGram + apostrophe in query = invalid result
I have the following field defined in my schema: fieldType name=ngram class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.LetterTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=1 maxGramSize=25 / /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.LetterTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType field name=person type=ngram indexed=true stored=true / I have the default field set to person and have indexed the following document: add doc field name=id![CDATA[1001116609]]/field field name=person![CDATA[Vincent M D'Onofrio]]/field /doc /add The following queries return the result as expected using the standard request handler: vincent m d onofrio d'o onofrio d onofrio The following query fails: d'onofrio This is weird because d'o returns a result. As soon as I type the n I start to get no results. I ran this though the field analysis page and it shows that this query is being tokenized correctly and should yield a result. I am using a build of trunk Solr (r1073990) and the example solrconfig.xml. I am also using the example schema with the addition of my ngram field. Any ideas? I have tried this with other word's containing an apostrophe and they all stop returning results after 4 characters. Thanks, Matt Weber
Partial search extremly slow
Since my users wanted to have a partial search functionality I had to introduce following. I have declared two EdgeNGram filters with both side back and front since they wanted to have partial search working from any side. fieldType name=edgytext class=solr.TextField analyzer tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=1maxGramSize=25 side=back/ filter class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=1maxGramSize=25 side=front/ /analyzer /fieldType When executing search (which brings back 4K plus records from the index) response time extremely slow. The two db columns which I index and search against are huge and where one of the db columns is of type CLOB. This is to give you an idea that this db column of type CLOB is being indexed with edgyText and also searched upon. From documentation I understand partial search behaves slow due to gram nature. what's the best way to implement this functionality and still get good response time? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Partial-search-extremly-slow-tp2572861p2572861.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr running on many sites
Hi Grant, Multi Sites == Multi Cores? :) http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore have a look Regards Stefan On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Grant Longhurst grant.longhu...@ecorner.com.au wrote: Hi, We are a e-commerce service provider and are looking at using solr for all the site searches. Was just wondering what the best way is to set it up for many sites instead of just one? Thanks. Regards, Grant Longhurst Technical Consultant eCorner Pty Ltd Phone: +61 2 9494 0200 Email: grant.longhu...@ecorner.com.au mailto:grant.longhu...@ecorner.com.au Web - www.ecorner.com.au Buy a store - www.ecornerstoresplus.com.au http://www.ecornerstoresplus.com.au/ Buy email security - www.cloudmark.com.au Need Support - www.ecorner.com.au/support http://www.ecorner.com.au/support Need Help! - help.ecorner.com http://help.ecorner.com/
Re: Make syntax highlighter caseinsensitive
Hi,
On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
The idea is that by not storing the caseInsensitiveBody I save some
space and gain some performance. So I query against the
caseInsensitiveBody and generate highlighting from the case sensitive
one.
The problem is that as a result, I am missing highlighting terms. For
example, when I search for solr and get a match in caseInsensitiveBody
for solr but that it is Solr in the original document, no highlighting
is done.
Is there a way around this? Currently I am using the following
highlighting params:
'hl' = 'on',
'hl.fl' = 'header,body',
'hl.usePhraseHighlighter' = 'true',
'hl.highlightMultiTerm' = 'true',
'hl.fragsize' = 200,
'hl.regex.pattern' = '[-\w ,/\n\\']{20,200}',
Tarjei,
Maybe silly question, but why no you make body field case insensitive
and eliminate caseInsensitiveBody field, and then query and highlight on
just body field?
Not silly. I need to support usage scenarios where case matters as well
as scenarios where case doesn't matter.
The best part would be if I could use one field for this, store it and
handle case sensitivity in the query phase, but as I understand it, that
is not possible.
Regards,
Tarjei
Koji
--
Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
Tarjei Huse
Mobil: 920 63 413
Re: Tomcat EXE Source Code
Why do you want it? Try asking on the Tomcat list :) -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 25. feb. 2011, at 09.16, rajini maski wrote: Can anybody help me to get the source code of the Tomcat exe file i.e, source code of the installation exe . Thanks..
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
Your best bet is perhaps upgrading to latest 1.4 branch, i.e. 1.4.2-dev (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/) It includes Tika 0.8-SNAPSHOT and is a compatible drop-in (war/jar) replacement with lots of other bug fixes you'd also like (check changes.txt). svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4 cd branch-1.4 ant dist -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 24. feb. 2011, at 21.42, jo wrote: I have tried the steps indicated here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler and when I try to parse a document nothing would happen, no error.. I have copied the jar files everywhere, and nothing.. can anyone give me the steps on how to upgrade just tika, btw, currently on 1.4.1 has tika 0.4 thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/upgrading-to-Tika-0-9-on-Solr-1-4-1-tp2570526p2570526.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Tomcat EXE Source Code
I am trying to configure tomcat multi instances with that many number of services configured too. Right now that particular tomcat exe let create only one. If the same exe run again and tried to configure at other destination folder ,It throws an exception as service already exists.How can I fix this problem.. Any suggestions? On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote: Why do you want it? Try asking on the Tomcat list :) -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 25. feb. 2011, at 09.16, rajini maski wrote: Can anybody help me to get the source code of the Tomcat exe file i.e, source code of the installation exe . Thanks..
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
You don't want to use 0.8 if you're parsing PDF. Your best bet is perhaps upgrading to latest 1.4 branch, i.e. 1.4.2-dev (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/) It includes Tika 0.8-SNAPSHOT and is a compatible drop-in (war/jar) replacement with lots of other bug fixes you'd also like (check changes.txt). svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4 cd branch-1.4 ant dist -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 24. feb. 2011, at 21.42, jo wrote: I have tried the steps indicated here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler and when I try to parse a document nothing would happen, no error.. I have copied the jar files everywhere, and nothing.. can anyone give me the steps on how to upgrade just tika, btw, currently on 1.4.1 has tika 0.4 thank you
Re: DIH regex remove email + extract url
Hi Rosa, Are you sure you have transformer=RegexTransformer in your entity/? My question was more about the solr DIH syntax. It doesn't work either with the new regex. Especially the syntax for this: field column=source xpath=/product/url regex=http:\/\/(.*?)\/(.*) / --- Is it correct? (not the regex, the syntax)? In this case, I think you need to have two field names in groupNames, because you have two groups (.*?) (.*) in your regex. But I'm not confident. Please try if you'd like... Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: CUSTOM JSP FOR APACHE SOLR
On Feb 1, 2011, at 08:58 , Estrada Groups wrote: Has anyone noticed the rails application that installs with Solr4.0? I am interested to hear some feedback on that one... I guess you're talking about the client/ruby/flare stuff? It's been untouched for quite a while and has not been upgraded to Rails3. It still works, and has a lot of (in my biased opinion! :) slick features that folks can borrow from. At one point Koji had a public demo site using it that I thought was way cool. Flare was used as a basis for the initial version of Blacklight http://projectblacklight.org/. Blacklight has since evolved dramatically into a very full featured (and mostly general purpose) way cool front-end to Solr. I still sometimes fire up Flare for demonstration purposes (saved searches that become facet.query's, Simile Timeline integration, and pie charts demo nicely). At this point, Flare is as-is... try it out if you are Ruby/Rails savvy. Erik
Re: Tomcat EXE Source Code
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:42 PM, rajini maski rajinima...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to configure tomcat multi instances with that many number of services configured too. Right now that particular tomcat exe let create only one. If the same exe run again and tried to configure at other destination folder ,It throws an exception as service already exists.How can I fix this problem.. Any suggestions? [...] This question properly belongs on a tomcat list, but if I understand your need correctly, you could try the results returned by searching Google for tomcat multiple instances. There is no need to modify the Tomcat source code. Regards, Gora
Re: problem when search grouping word
Any idea? On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Chamnap Chhorn chamnapchh...@gmail.comwrote: There are many product names. How could I list them all, and the list is growing fast as well? On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Grijesh pintu.grij...@gmail.com wrote: may synonym will help - Thanx: Grijesh http://lucidimagination.com -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/problem-when-search-grouping-word-tp2566499p2566550.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Chhorn Chamnap http://chamnapchhorn.blogspot.com/ -- Chhorn Chamnap http://chamnapchhorn.blogspot.com/
solr score issue
Hi sir , Can anyone explain me how this score is being calculated. i am searching here software engineer using dismax handler. Total documents indexed are 477 and query results are 28. Query is like that - q=software+engineerfq=location%3Adelhi dismax setting is - str name=qf alltext title^2 functional_role^1 /str str name=pf body^100 /str Here alltext field is made by copying all fields. body field contains detail of job. I am unable to understand how these scores have been calculated. From where to start score calculating and what are default score for any term matching. str name=20080604/3eb9a7b30131a782a0c0a0e2cdb2b6b8.html 0.5901718 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0032821721 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0026574256 = (MATCH) max plus 0.1 times others of: 0.0026574256 = (MATCH) weight(alltext:softwar in 339), product of: 0.0067262817 = queryWeight(alltext:softwar), product of: 3.6121683 = idf(docFreq=34, maxDocs=477) 0.0018621174 = queryNorm 0.39508092 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(alltext:softwar in 339), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(alltext:softwar)=1) 3.6121683 = idf(docFreq=34, maxDocs=477) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(field=alltext, doc=339) 6.2474643E-4 = (MATCH) max plus 0.1 times others of: 6.2474643E-4 = (MATCH) weight(alltext:engin in 339), product of: 0.0032613424 = queryWeight(alltext:engin), product of: 1.7514161 = idf(docFreq=224, maxDocs=477) 0.0018621174 = queryNorm 0.19156113 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(alltext:engin in 339), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(alltext:engin)=1) 1.7514161 = idf(docFreq=224, maxDocs=477) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(field=alltext, doc=339) 0.5868896 = weight(body:softwar engin^100.0 in 339), product of: 0.9995919 = queryWeight(body:softwar engin^100.0), product of: 100.0 = boost 5.3680387 = idf(body: softwar=34 engin=223) 0.0018621174 = queryNorm 0.58712924 = fieldWeight(body:softwar engin in 339), product of: 1.0 = tf(phraseFreq=1.0) 5.3680387 = idf(body: softwar=34 engin=223) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(field=body, doc=339) /str please suggest me. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-score-issue-tp2574680p2574680.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: solr admin result page error
Hi Markus, the result of my investigation is that Lucene currently can only handle UTF-8 code within BMP [Basic Multilingual Plane] (plane 0) = 0x. Any code above BMP might end in unpredictable results which is bad. If you get invalid UTF-8 from the index and use wt=xml it gives the error page. This is due to encoding=text/xml and charset=utf-8 in the header. If you use wt=json then the encoding is text/plain and charset=utf-8. Because of text/plain you don't get an error page but nevertheless the content is invalid. I guess it replaces all invalid code with UTF-8 BOM. So currently no solution, even not with JSON. This should (hopefully) be fixed with Lucene 3.1. Regards, Bernd Am 11.02.2011 15:50, schrieb Markus Jelsma: No i haven't located the issue. It might be Solr but it could also be Xerces having trouble with it. You can possibly work around the problem by using the JSONResponseWriter. On Friday 11 February 2011 15:45:23 Bernd Fehling wrote: Hi Markus, yes it looks like the same issue. There is also a \u utf8-code in your dump. Till now I followed it into XMLResponseWriter. Some steps before the result in a buffer looks good and the utf8-code is correct. Really hard to debug this freaky problem. Have you looked deeper into this and located the bug? It is definately a bug and has nothing to do with firefox. Regards, Bernd Am 11.02.2011 13:48, schrieb Markus Jelsma: It looks like you hit the same issue as i did a while ago: http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg46510.html On Friday 11 February 2011 08:59:27 Bernd Fehling wrote: Dear list, after loading some documents via DIH which also include urls I get this yellow XML error page as search result from solr admin GUI after a search. It says XML processing error not well-formed. The code it argues about is: arr name=dcurls strhttp://eprints.soton.ac.uk/43350//str strhttp://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1112/S0024610706023143/str strMartinez-Perez, Conchita and Nucinkis, Brita E.A. (2006) Cohomological dimension of Mackey functors for infinite groups. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 74, (2), 379-396. (doi:10.1112/S0024610706023143 lt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S002461070602314\ugt;)/str/arr See the \u utf8-code in the last line. 1. the loaded data is valid, well-formed and checked with xmllint. No errors. 2. there is no \u utf8-code in the source data. 3. the data is loaded via DIH without any errors. 4. if opening the source-view of the result page with firefox there is also no \u utf8-code. Only idea I have is solr itself or the result page generation. How to proceed, what else to check? Regards, Bernd -- * Bernd FehlingUniversitätsbibliothek Bielefeld Dipl.-Inform. (FH)Universitätsstr. 25 Tel. +49 521 106-4060 Fax. +49 521 106-4052 bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de33615 Bielefeld BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine - www.base-search.net *
Re: Tomcat EXE Source Code
Some of these links may help... http://www.google.com/search?client=safarirls=enq=apache+tomcat+downloadie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8 Adam On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:16 AM, rajini maski wrote: Can anybody help me to get the source code of the Tomcat exe file i.e, source code of the installation exe . Thanks..
Re: Make syntax highlighter caseinsensitive
(11/02/25 18:30), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
The idea is that by not storing the caseInsensitiveBody I save some
space and gain some performance. So I query against the
caseInsensitiveBody and generate highlighting from the case sensitive
one.
The problem is that as a result, I am missing highlighting terms. For
example, when I search for solr and get a match in caseInsensitiveBody
for solr but that it is Solr in the original document, no highlighting
is done.
Is there a way around this? Currently I am using the following
highlighting params:
'hl' = 'on',
'hl.fl' = 'header,body',
'hl.usePhraseHighlighter' = 'true',
'hl.highlightMultiTerm' = 'true',
'hl.fragsize' = 200,
'hl.regex.pattern' = '[-\w ,/\n\\']{20,200}',
Tarjei,
Maybe silly question, but why no you make body field case insensitive
and eliminate caseInsensitiveBody field, and then query and highlight on
just body field?
Not silly. I need to support usage scenarios where case matters as well
as scenarios where case doesn't matter.
The best part would be if I could use one field for this, store it and
handle case sensitivity in the query phase, but as I understand it, that
is not possible.
Hi Tarjei,
If I understand it correctly, you want to highlight case insensitive way.
If so, it is easy. You have:
body: indexed but not stored
caseInsensitiveBody: indexed and stored
and request hl.fl=caseInsensitiveBody ?
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: Tomcat EXE Source Code
I am trying to configure tomcat multi instances with that many number of services configured too. Right now that particular tomcat exe let create only one. If the same exe run again and tried to configure at other destination folder ,It throws an exception as service already exists.How can I fix this problem.. Any suggestions? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/179/use-multiple-catalina-base-to-setup-tomcat-6-instances-on-windows
Re: solr score issue
Check the Need help in understanding output of searcher.explain() function thread. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/201008.mbox/%3CAANLkTi=m9a1guhrahpeyqaxhu9gta9fjbnr7-8-zi...@mail.gmail.com%3E Regards, Jayendra On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Bagesh Sharma mail.bag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi sir , Can anyone explain me how this score is being calculated. i am searching here software engineer using dismax handler. Total documents indexed are 477 and query results are 28. Query is like that - q=software+engineerfq=location%3Adelhi dismax setting is - str name=qf alltext title^2 functional_role^1 /str str name=pf body^100 /str Here alltext field is made by copying all fields. body field contains detail of job. I am unable to understand how these scores have been calculated. From where to start score calculating and what are default score for any term matching. str name=20080604/3eb9a7b30131a782a0c0a0e2cdb2b6b8.html 0.5901718 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0032821721 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0026574256 = (MATCH) max plus 0.1 times others of: 0.0026574256 = (MATCH) weight(alltext:softwar in 339), product of: 0.0067262817 = queryWeight(alltext:softwar), product of: 3.6121683 = idf(docFreq=34, maxDocs=477) 0.0018621174 = queryNorm 0.39508092 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(alltext:softwar in 339), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(alltext:softwar)=1) 3.6121683 = idf(docFreq=34, maxDocs=477) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(field=alltext, doc=339) 6.2474643E-4 = (MATCH) max plus 0.1 times others of: 6.2474643E-4 = (MATCH) weight(alltext:engin in 339), product of: 0.0032613424 = queryWeight(alltext:engin), product of: 1.7514161 = idf(docFreq=224, maxDocs=477) 0.0018621174 = queryNorm 0.19156113 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(alltext:engin in 339), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(alltext:engin)=1) 1.7514161 = idf(docFreq=224, maxDocs=477) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(field=alltext, doc=339) 0.5868896 = weight(body:softwar engin^100.0 in 339), product of: 0.9995919 = queryWeight(body:softwar engin^100.0), product of: 100.0 = boost 5.3680387 = idf(body: softwar=34 engin=223) 0.0018621174 = queryNorm 0.58712924 = fieldWeight(body:softwar engin in 339), product of: 1.0 = tf(phraseFreq=1.0) 5.3680387 = idf(body: softwar=34 engin=223) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(field=body, doc=339) /str please suggest me. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-score-issue-tp2574680p2574680.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Question on writing custom UpdateHandler
I am trying to write my own custom UpdateHandler that extends
DirectUpdateHandler2.
I would like to be able to query the current state of the index within
the addDoc method. How would I be able to accomplish this?
I tried something like the following but it was a big fat fail as it
quickly created an enormous amount of indexes files and I received a
too many open files exception.
/iwCommit.lock();
try {
openWriter();
docs = new IndexSearcher(writer.getReader()).search(query, MAX_DOCS);
} finally {
iwCommit.unlock();
}/
I'm guessing the call to new IndexSearcher is at fault but I'm unsure of
a way around this.
Thanks for your help!
Re: Question on writing custom UpdateHandler
Or how can I perform a query on the current state of the index from
within an UpdateProcessor?
Thanks
On 2/25/11 6:30 AM, Mark wrote:
I am trying to write my own custom UpdateHandler that extends
DirectUpdateHandler2.
I would like to be able to query the current state of the index within
the addDoc method. How would I be able to accomplish this?
I tried something like the following but it was a big fat fail as it
quickly created an enormous amount of indexes files and I received a
too many open files exception.
/iwCommit.lock();
try {
openWriter();
docs = new IndexSearcher(writer.getReader()).search(query, MAX_DOCS);
} finally {
iwCommit.unlock();
}/
I'm guessing the call to new IndexSearcher is at fault but I'm unsure
of a way around this.
Thanks for your help!
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
Hi Jo, You may consider checking out Tika trunk, where we recently have a Tika JAX-RS web service [1] committed as part of the tika-server module. You could probably wire DIH into it and accomplish the same thing. Cheers, Chris [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-593 On Feb 24, 2011, at 12:42 PM, jo wrote: I have tried the steps indicated here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler and when I try to parse a document nothing would happen, no error.. I have copied the jar files everywhere, and nothing.. can anyone give me the steps on how to upgrade just tika, btw, currently on 1.4.1 has tika 0.4 thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/upgrading-to-Tika-0-9-on-Solr-1-4-1-tp2570526p2570526.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
manually editing spellcheck dictionary
I'm using an index based spellcheck dictionary and I was wondering if there were a way for me to manually remove certain words from the dictionary. Some of my content has some mis-spellings, and for example when I search for the word sherrif (which should be spelled sheriff), it get recommendations like sherriff or sherri instead. If I could remove those words, it would seem like the system would work a little better.
Re: manually editing spellcheck dictionary
If the dictionary is a Lucene index, wouldn't it be as simple as delete using a term query? Something like this: IndexReader sdreader = new IndexReader(); sdreader.delete(new Term(word, sherri)); ... sdreader.optimize(); sdreader.close(); I am guessing your dictionary is built dynamically using content words. If so, you may want to run the words through an aspell like filter (jazzy.sf.net is a Java implementation of aspell that works quite well with single words) to determine if more of these should be removed, and whether they should be added in the first place. -sujit On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 10:41 -0700, Tanner Postert wrote: I'm using an index based spellcheck dictionary and I was wondering if there were a way for me to manually remove certain words from the dictionary. Some of my content has some mis-spellings, and for example when I search for the word sherrif (which should be spelled sheriff), it get recommendations like sherriff or sherri instead. If I could remove those words, it would seem like the system would work a little better.
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
You guys are great.. I will stick for now to the release version and if I have problem parsing I will give the branch jars a try the reason I am looking for upgrading tika is because tika keeps improving on things like languages, mime type support, and so on thanks again JO -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/upgrading-to-Tika-0-9-on-Solr-1-4-1-tp2570526p2576658.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
hi if you want to index pdf files then use tika 0.6 because 0.7 and 0.8 does not detect the correctly the pdfParse
Re: Omitting tf but not positions
I also have a case (yellow-page) where IDF comes in and destroys the rank. A company listing with a word which occurs in few other listings is not necessarily better than others just because of that. When it gets to the extreme value of IDF=1, we get an artificially high IDF boost. It is not killed by omitNorms, neither by omitTermFrequencyAndPositions. Any per-field way to get rid of the IDF effect? Or should I override idf() in Similarity? -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 15. des. 2010, at 13.27, Robert Muir wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent jan@cominvent.com wrote: Any way to disable TF/IDF normalization without also disabling positions? see Similarity.tf(float) and Similarity.tf(int) if you want to change this for both terms and phrases just override Similarity.tf(float), since by default Similarity.tf(int) delegates to that. otherwise, override both. of course the big limitation being you cant customize Similarity per-field yet.
Re: Omitting tf but not positions
Jan, You are correct, you'll need your own Similarity class. Have a look at SweetSpotSimilarity (http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/api/contrib-misc/org/apache/lucene/misc/SweetSpotSimilarity.html) On 2/25/11 10:57 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: I also have a case (yellow-page) where IDF comes in and destroys the rank. A company listing with a word which occurs in few other listings is not necessarily better than others just because of that. When it gets to the extreme value of IDF=1, we get an artificially high IDF boost. It is not killed by omitNorms, neither by omitTermFrequencyAndPositions. Any per-field way to get rid of the IDF effect? Or should I override idf() in Similarity? -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 15. des. 2010, at 13.27, Robert Muir wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent jan@cominvent.com wrote: Any way to disable TF/IDF normalization without also disabling positions? see Similarity.tf(float) and Similarity.tf(int) if you want to change this for both terms and phrases just override Similarity.tf(float), since by default Similarity.tf(int) delegates to that. otherwise, override both. of course the big limitation being you cant customize Similarity per-field yet.
Re: Omitting tf but not positions
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote: I also have a case (yellow-page) where IDF comes in and destroys the rank. A company listing with a word which occurs in few other listings is not necessarily better than others just because of that. When it gets to the extreme value of IDF=1, we get an artificially high IDF boost. It is not killed by omitNorms, neither by omitTermFrequencyAndPositions. Any per-field way to get rid of the IDF effect? Or should I override idf() in Similarity? Hi Jan, my reply was back in december. These days in lucene/solr trunk, you can customize Similarity on a per-field basis. So your yellow-page field can have a completely different similarity (tf, idf, lengthnorm, etc). For that field you can disable things like TF and IDF entirely, e.g. just set it to a constant such as 1 or if you think thats too risky, consider an alternative ranking scheme that doesn't use the IDF at all such as the example in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2864 For now, you have to implement SimilarityProvider in a java class (with something like a hashmap returning different similaritys for different fields), and set this up with the similarity hook in schema.xml, but there is an issue open to make this easier: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2338
Re: boosting based on number of terms matched?
: I'm using the edismax handler, although my question is probably the same for : dismax. When the user types a long query, I use the mm parameter so that : only 75% of terms need to match. This works fine, however, sometimes documents : that only match 75% of the terms show up higher in my results than documents : that match 100%. I'd like to set a boost so that documents that match 100% : will be much more likely to be put ahead of documents that only match 75%. Can : anyone give me a pointer of how to do this? Thanks, this is essentially the default behavior -- mm just sets a minimum number of clauses to be considered a match, but the coord factor still applies and penalizes docs based on how many clauses they don't match. if you are seeing docs that match fewer terms score higher then docs matching more terms it is likely because of the boosts you already have specified (either in the qf, or maybe using the bf), but the discrepency could be based on other standard scoring factors as well (lengthNorm, index time doc boosts, the IDF of the terms, etc... this is where it beocmes neccessary to start looking at score explanations and really thinking through the data. -Hoss
Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?
Hello, I've asked this on the Tika mailing list w/o an answer, so apologies for cross-posting. I'm trying to find information that tells me specifically what metadata is provided for the different supported document formats. Unfortunately all I was able to find so far is The Metadata produced depends on the type of document submitted. Currently, I'm using ExtractingRequestHandler from Solr 1.4 (with Tika 0.4), so I'm particularly interested in that version, but also in changes that are provided in newer versions of Tika. Where are the best places to look for such information? Thanks in advance, Andreas
Re: DIH regex remove email + extract url
Hi Koji, Yes of course i have RegexTransformer in my entity/. What i'm not sure is the syntax of this field column=source xpath=/product/url regex= / i don't need any other parameter here? Rosa Le 25/02/2011 12:21, Koji Sekiguchi a écrit : Hi Rosa, Are you sure you have transformer=RegexTransformer in your entity/? My question was more about the solr DIH syntax. It doesn't work either with the new regex. Especially the syntax for this: field column=source xpath=/product/url regex=http:\/\/(.*?)\/(.*) / --- Is it correct? (not the regex, the syntax)? In this case, I think you need to have two field names in groupNames, because you have two groups (.*?) (.*) in your regex. But I'm not confident. Please try if you'd like... Koji
Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?
Hi Andreas, In Tika 0.8+, you can run the --list-met-models command from tika-app: java -jar tika-app-version.jar --list-met-models And get a print out of the met keys that Tika supports. Some parsers add their own that aren't part of this met listing, but this is a relatively comprehensive list. Cheers, Chris On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Andreas Kemkes wrote: Hello, I've asked this on the Tika mailing list w/o an answer, so apologies for cross-posting. I'm trying to find information that tells me specifically what metadata is provided for the different supported document formats. Unfortunately all I was able to find so far is The Metadata produced depends on the type of document submitted. Currently, I'm using ExtractingRequestHandler from Solr 1.4 (with Tika 0.4), so I'm particularly interested in that version, but also in changes that are provided in newer versions of Tika. Where are the best places to look for such information? Thanks in advance, Andreas ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?
Hi Chris, Thank you so much - that's a great start. Andreas From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: u...@tika.apache.org u...@tika.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 1:21:33 PM Subject: Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format? Hi Andreas, In Tika 0.8+, you can run the --list-met-models command from tika-app: java -jar tika-app-version.jar --list-met-models And get a print out of the met keys that Tika supports. Some parsers add their own that aren't part of this met listing, but this is a relatively comprehensive list. Cheers, Chris On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Andreas Kemkes wrote: Hello, I've asked this on the Tika mailing list w/o an answer, so apologies for cross-posting. I'm trying to find information that tells me specifically what metadata is provided for the different supported document formats. Unfortunately all I was able to find so far is The Metadata produced depends on the type of document submitted. Currently, I'm using ExtractingRequestHandler from Solr 1.4 (with Tika 0.4), so I'm particularly interested in that version, but also in changes that are provided in newer versions of Tika. Where are the best places to look for such information? Thanks in advance, Andreas ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
According to the Tika release notes, it's fixed in 0.9. Haven't tried it myself. A critical backwards incompatible bug in PDF parsing that was introduced in Tika 0.8 has been fixed. (TIKA-548) Andreas From: Darx Oman darxo...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 10:33:39 AM Subject: Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1 hi if you want to index pdf files then use tika 0.6 because 0.7 and 0.8 does not detect the correctly the pdfParse
Case insensitive but number sensitive string?
I want a string field that is case insensitive. This is what I tried: fieldType name=cistring class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType However, it is matching opengl for opengl128. I want exact string matches, but I want them case-insensitive. What did I do wrong?
Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1
Yep it's fixed in 0.9. Cheers, Chris On Feb 25, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Andreas Kemkes wrote: According to the Tika release notes, it's fixed in 0.9. Haven't tried it myself. A critical backwards incompatible bug in PDF parsing that was introduced in Tika 0.8 has been fixed. (TIKA-548) Andreas From: Darx Oman darxo...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 10:33:39 AM Subject: Re: upgrading to Tika 0.9 on Solr 1.4.1 hi if you want to index pdf files then use tika 0.6 because 0.7 and 0.8 does not detect the correctly the pdfParse ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: Case insensitive but number sensitive string?
I want a string field that is case insensitive. This is what I tried: fieldType name=cistring class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType However, it is matching opengl for opengl128. I want exact string matches, but I want them case-insensitive. What did I do wrong? class=solr.StrField should be class=solr.TextField
Re: Case insensitive but number sensitive string?
Ahmet Arslan iorixxx at yahoo.com writes: I want a string field that is case insensitive. This is what I tried: fieldType name=cistring class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType However, it is matching opengl for opengl128. I want exact string matches, but I want them case-insensitive. What did I do wrong? class=solr.StrField should be class=solr.TextField This is what I ended up with. Seems to work: fieldType name=cistring class=solr.TextField sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType
Re: DIH regex remove email + extract url
(11/02/26 5:24), Rosa (Anuncios) wrote: Hi Koji, Yes of course i have RegexTransformer in my entity/. What i'm not sure is the syntax of this field column=source xpath=/product/url regex= / i don't need any other parameter here? Hi Rosa, So I've mentioned groupNames attribute for field element in previous mail. Did you try it? Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?
Hi Chris, java -jar tika-app-0.9.jar --list-met-models TikaMetadataKeys PROTECTED RESOURCE_NAME_KEY TikaMimeKeys MIME_TYPE_MAGIC TIKA_MIME_FILE Both 0.8 and 0.9 give me the same list. Is that a configuration issue? I'm a bit unclear if that gets me to what I was looking for - metadata like content_type or last_modified. Or am I confusing Tika metadata with SolrCell metadata? I thought SolrCell metadata comes from Tika, or does it not? Regards, Andreas From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: u...@tika.apache.org u...@tika.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 1:21:33 PM Subject: Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format? Hi Andreas, In Tika 0.8+, you can run the --list-met-models command from tika-app: java -jar tika-app-version.jar --list-met-models And get a print out of the met keys that Tika supports. Some parsers add their own that aren't part of this met listing, but this is a relatively comprehensive list. Cheers, Chris On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Andreas Kemkes wrote: Hello, I've asked this on the Tika mailing list w/o an answer, so apologies for cross-posting. I'm trying to find information that tells me specifically what metadata is provided for the different supported document formats. Unfortunately all I was able to find so far is The Metadata produced depends on the type of document submitted. Currently, I'm using ExtractingRequestHandler from Solr 1.4 (with Tika 0.4), so I'm particularly interested in that version, but also in changes that are provided in newer versions of Tika. Where are the best places to look for such information? Thanks in advance, Andreas ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?
Hi Andreas, java -jar tika-app-0.9.jar --list-met-models TikaMetadataKeys PROTECTED RESOURCE_NAME_KEY TikaMimeKeys MIME_TYPE_MAGIC TIKA_MIME_FILE Both 0.8 and 0.9 give me the same list. Is that a configuration issue? Strange -- those are the only met models you're seeing listed? I'm a bit unclear if that gets me to what I was looking for - metadata like content_type or last_modified. Or am I confusing Tika metadata with SolrCell metadata? I thought SolrCell metadata comes from Tika, or does it not? It does come from Tika that's for sure, but in SolrCell, there is a configuration for the ExtractingRequestHandler that remaps the field names from Tika to Solr. So that's probably where it's coming from. Check this out: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler HTH! Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Help on query time boosting effect using standardQueryParser
For the solr example(exampleDIH), how do i achieve the following with standard queryparser? search all docs which name field contains memory (primary query logic), Within that resultset, boost the doc matches features:battery (boosting logic). Note that I have to use standard queryparser in my project (for the sake of fuzzy prefix query and etc). I tried using the following query, but it returns result that does not match name:memory: query: str name=rawquerystringname:memory features:battery^100 /str str name=querystringname:memory features:battery^100 /str str name=parsedqueryname:memori features:batteri^100.0/str str name=parsedquery_toStringname:memori features:batteri^100.0/str genreate result: result name=response numFound=4 start=0 maxScore=0.23815624 The top result only contains features:battery, but does not have memory in name field -- unexpected result. I don't want such doc as part of the result. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Help-on-query-time-boosting-effect-using-standardQueryParser-tp2579763p2579763.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Help on query time boosting effect using standardQueryParser
Once i change the query to be: +name:memory features:battery^100 str name=rawquerystring+name:memory features:battery^100 /str str name=querystring+name:memory features:battery^100 /str str name=parsedquery+name:memori features:batteri^100.0/str str name=parsedquery_toString+name:memori features:batteri^100.0/str Then it gets rid of result that only result which does not match name:memory. However, I wonder if there is better way of achieving this? Is there something in standardquery that just affect the ranking? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Help-on-query-time-boosting-effect-using-standardQueryParser-tp2579763p2579800.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr running on many sites
You would want to evaluate the size and the number of searched, plus how often the index will need changed data. There is no recipe just good experience. Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Stefan Matheis matheis.ste...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Grant, Multi Sites == Multi Cores? :) http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore have a look Regards Stefan On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Grant Longhurst grant.longhu...@ecorner.com.au wrote: Hi, We are a e-commerce service provider and are looking at using solr for all the site searches. Was just wondering what the best way is to set it up for many sites instead of just one? Thanks. Regards, Grant Longhurst Technical Consultant eCorner Pty Ltd Phone: +61 2 9494 0200 Email: grant.longhu...@ecorner.com.au mailto:grant.longhu...@ecorner.com.au Web - www.ecorner.com.au Buy a store - www.ecornerstoresplus.com.au http://www.ecornerstoresplus.com.au/ Buy email security - www.cloudmark.com.au Need Support - www.ecorner.com.au/support http://www.ecorner.com.au/support Need Help! - help.ecorner.com http://help.ecorner.com/
How to handle special character in filter query
How to handle special character when constructing filter query? for example, i want to do something like: http://.fq=genre:ACTION ADVENTURE How do i handle the space and in the filter query part? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-handle-special-character-in-filter-query-tp2579978p2579978.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Problems with JSP pages?
I'm on Windows Vista, using the trunk. Some of the JSP pages do not execute, but instead Jetty downloads them. solr/admin/get-properties.jsp for example. This is called by the 'JAVA PROPERTIES' button in the main admin page. Is this a known problem/quirk for Windows? Or fallout from a jetty change? Or...? -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
