date:20110228

 I'm waiting on my
 host to add my IP to the
 firewall for me, so I can test that part of it (they setup
 the bog standard
 Solr for me, but I'm now trying to get it working with the
 multicore, as I
 think we are gonna need several Solr instances for
 different parts of the


If you have multicore setup, it is normal that below URL is not accessible.

http://localhost:210/solr/graphics

You should use the URL ending with 'graphics/admin/' instead. Even if you 
remove last slash, you will get 404 Error.

Here is the list of valid URLs:
http://localhost:210/solr/
http://localhost:210/solr
http://localhost:210/solr/graphics/admin/

Invalid (HTTP ERROR: 404) URLs:

http://localhost:210/solr/graphics
http://localhost:210/solr/graphics/
http://localhost:210/solr/graphics/admin

Re: Getting sum of all terms count in dataset instead of document count using TermsComponent....(and TermsComponent vs Facets)

 from head, but also tried on
  1.4.1.
 
 
 The instructions i posted works with 1.4.1. You need to
 import TermDocs in TermsComponent.java :
 
 import org.apache.lucene.index.TermDocs;

Ravish, did you get it working? Can you give us feedback?

Re: Problem with Solr and Nutch integration

2011-02-28 Thread Anurag

Solr uses jetty server  default, do u know that? you can run solr server
without using Tomcat (using jetty server).
Please describe the steps that led to the error. Which command u executed?

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Paul Rogers [via Lucene] 
ml-node+2590334-620834624-146...@n3.nabble.com wrote:

 Hi Guys

 I'm trying to integrate solr and nutch as per
 http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/, using the
 branch_3x from svn on Tomcat 6.  After adding the nutch requestHandler to

 solrconfig.xml while the solr-example will start on accessing the admin
 page
 I get the following error message:

 HTTP Status 404 - missing core name in path
 --

 *type* Status report

 *message* *missing core name in path*

 *description* *The requested resource (missing core name in path) is not
 available.*

 After  googling I found the following:

 I think you are seeing the effects of SOLR-1743 masking another error ...
 have you checked your log for other errors/exceptions being logged when
 you startup solr with that solrconfig.xml?

 Chris Hostetter

 My initial question is this, am I right in thinking that solr should be
 using the Tomcat 6 logging and that logs should be found at
 $CATALINA_HOME/logs/catalina.out?

 Thanks

 Paul


 --
  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
 below:

 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Solr-and-Nutch-integration-tp2590334p2590334.html
  To start a new topic under Solr - User, email
 ml-node+472068-1941297125-146...@n3.nabble.com
 To unsubscribe from Solr - User, click 
 herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=472068code=YW51cmFnLml0LmpvbGx5QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0NzIwNjh8LTIwOTgzNDQxOTY=.





-- 
Kumar Anurag


-
Kumar Anurag

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Solr-and-Nutch-integration-tp2590334p2594293.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

MorelikeThis not working with Shards(distributed Search)

2011-02-28 Thread Isha Garg


Hi,

 I am experimenting with the *morelikethis* to see if it also works 
with *distributed* search.But i did not get the solution yet.Can anyone 
help me regarding this. please provide me detailed description. as I 
didnt find it by updating 
MoreLikeThisComponent.java,MoreLikeThisHandler.java,ShardRequest.java 
specified in the AlternateDistributedMLT.patch .


Thanks in advance..
Isha Garg

Re: Create a tomcat service.

2011-02-28 Thread Jan Høydahl

You may have downloaded the wrong Tomcat package?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tomcat+windows+service

On 28. feb. 2011, at 12.25, rajini maski wrote:

  Does anybody have a script to create a tomcat service? I'm trying
 to set my system up to run multiple instances of tomcat at the same time (on
 different ports, obviously), and can't get the service to create properly.I
 tried to follow the steps mentioned in this
 linkhttp://doc.ittrium.com/ittrium/visit/A1x66x1y1x10ddx1x68y1x1209x1x68y1x1214x1x7d..
 But not successful in getting this thing done.. The service.bat
 file referring to an exe that is not available in the zip. Any help or
 suggestions?
 
 
 Thanks,
 Rajani.

Re: Create a tomcat service.

2011-02-28 Thread Savvas-Andreas Moysidis

Hi Rajini,

We use the following script ran from within {TOMCAT_HOME}\bin directory to
create service instances (assuming you are targeting Windows Server
environments..):

cd C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin

set CATALINA_BASE=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}

rem Delete service if it already exists
rem tomcat6 //DS//your_instance_name

tomcat6 //IS//your_instance_name --DisplayName={TOMCAT_HOME}
--Description=This is your instance description
--Install=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin\tomcat6.exe
--Classpath=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin\bootstrap.jar
--Jvm=auto
--Startup=auto
--StartMode=jvm
--StartPath=C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}
--StopMode=jvm
--StartClass=org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap
--StartParams=start
--StopClass=org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap
--StopParams=stop
--StopPath=C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}
--Startup=auto
--LogPath=%CATALINA_BASE%\logs
--StdOutput=auto
--StdError=auto
--JvmOptions=-Dcatalina.home='C:\Program Files\Apache Software
Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}';-Dcatalina.base=%CATALINA_BASE%;-Djava.io.tmpdir=%CATALINA_BASE%\temp;-Djava.endorsed.dirs='C:\Program
Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\endorsed'

rem Copy service applet tomcat6w.exe to instance name
copy tomcat6w.exe your_instance_name.exe /Y


Regards,
- Savvas

On 28 February 2011 12:15, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:

 You may have downloaded the wrong Tomcat package?

 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tomcat+windows+service

 On 28. feb. 2011, at 12.25, rajini maski wrote:

   Does anybody have a script to create a tomcat service? I'm
 trying
  to set my system up to run multiple instances of tomcat at the same time
 (on
  different ports, obviously), and can't get the service to create
 properly.I
  tried to follow the steps mentioned in this
  link
 http://doc.ittrium.com/ittrium/visit/A1x66x1y1x10ddx1x68y1x1209x1x68y1x1214x1x7d
 ..
  But not successful in getting this thing done.. The service.bat
  file referring to an exe that is not available in the zip. Any help or
  suggestions?
 
 
  Thanks,
  Rajani.

Re: Create a tomcat service.

2011-02-28 Thread Savvas-Andreas Moysidis

..--DisplayName doesn't *have* to be {TOMCAT_HOME} of course..just a copy
paste artifact.. :D

On 28 February 2011 12:21, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis 
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi Rajini,

 We use the following script ran from within {TOMCAT_HOME}\bin directory to
 create service instances (assuming you are targeting Windows Server
 environments..):

 cd C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin

 set CATALINA_BASE=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
 Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}

 rem Delete service if it already exists
 rem tomcat6 //DS//your_instance_name

 tomcat6 //IS//your_instance_name --DisplayName={TOMCAT_HOME}
 --Description=This is your instance description
 --Install=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
 Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin\tomcat6.exe
 --Classpath=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
 Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin\bootstrap.jar
 --Jvm=auto
 --Startup=auto
 --StartMode=jvm
 --StartPath=C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}
 --StopMode=jvm
 --StartClass=org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap
 --StartParams=start
 --StopClass=org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap
 --StopParams=stop
 --StopPath=C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}
 --Startup=auto
 --LogPath=%CATALINA_BASE%\logs
 --StdOutput=auto
 --StdError=auto
 --JvmOptions=-Dcatalina.home='C:\Program Files\Apache Software
 Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}';-Dcatalina.base=%CATALINA_BASE%;-Djava.io.tmpdir=%CATALINA_BASE%\temp;-Djava.endorsed.dirs='C:\Program
 Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\endorsed'

 rem Copy service applet tomcat6w.exe to instance name
 copy tomcat6w.exe your_instance_name.exe /Y


 Regards,
 - Savvas

 On 28 February 2011 12:15, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:

 You may have downloaded the wrong Tomcat package?

 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tomcat+windows+service

 On 28. feb. 2011, at 12.25, rajini maski wrote:

   Does anybody have a script to create a tomcat service? I'm
 trying
  to set my system up to run multiple instances of tomcat at the same time
 (on
  different ports, obviously), and can't get the service to create
 properly.I
  tried to follow the steps mentioned in this
  link
 http://doc.ittrium.com/ittrium/visit/A1x66x1y1x10ddx1x68y1x1209x1x68y1x1214x1x7d
 ..
  But not successful in getting this thing done.. The service.bat
  file referring to an exe that is not available in the zip. Any help or
  suggestions?
 
 
  Thanks,
  Rajani.

Distances in spatial search (Solr 4.0)

2011-02-28 Thread Alexandre Rocco

Hi guys,

We are implementing a separate index on our website, that will be dedicated
to spatial search.
I've downloaded a build of Solr 4.0 to try the spatial features and got the
geodist working really fast.

We now have 2 other features that will be needed on this project:
1. Returning the distance from the reference point to the search hit (in
kilometers)
2. Sorting by the distance.

On item 2, the wiki doc points that a distance function can be used but I
was not able to find good info on how to accomplish it.
Also, returning the distance (item 1) is noted as currently being in
development and there is some workaround to get it.

Anyone had experience with the spatial feature and could help with some
pointers on how to achieve it?

Thanks,
Alexandre

Re: Understanding multi-field queries with q and fq

Hi, Otis.

I have been playing with dismax (defType=dismax, not qt=dismax -- not sure
about the difference). It looks like eDismax won't be available until Solr
3.1, correct?

We actually have to pass hundreds of Oracle OLS labels in each request for
each user (e.g., Loan Officer can see her customers' data, but VP can see
all customer data).   I've been passing them as an fq parameter, but have
recently learned that's bad, since fq parameters participate in caching.  

We obviously *only* want the label comparisons performed against the label
field. (Those values won't be present in the other search-able fields that
the dismax would run all query parameters against.)

Is there some dismax query magic that would allow us to match the labels in
an uncached manner against only the labels field, but match the user-entered
query against the qf fields?   If not, I think we're stuck with moving the
labels piece to q and the user query to fq and sticking with the standard
handler.


Thanks!



Otis Gospodnetic-2 wrote:
 
 Hi mrw,
 
 It sounds like you (e)dismax is what you should look into.  You didn't
 mention 
 it/them, so I'm assuming you're not aware of them.
 
 See: http://search-lucene.com/?q=dismax+OR+edismaxfc_project=Solr
 
 Otis
 
 Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
 Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
 
 
 
 - Original Message 
 From: mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 1:56:24 PM
 Subject: Understanding multi-field queries with q and fq
 
 
 
 After searching this list, Google, and looking through the Pugh book, I 
 am a
 little confused about the right way to structure a query.
 
 The  Packt book uses the example of the MusicBrainz DB full of song
 metadata. 
 What if they also had the song lyrics in English and German as files  on
 disk, and wanted to index them along with the metadata, so that  each
 document would basically have song title, artist, publisher, date,  ...,
 All_Metadata (copy field of all metadata fields), Text_English,  and
 Text_German fields?  
 
 There can only be one default field,  correct?  So if we want to search
 for
 all songs containing (zeppelin AND  (dog OR merle)) do we 
 
 repeat the entire query text for all three major  fields in the 'q'
 clause
 (assuming we don't want to use the  cache):
 
 q=(+All_Metadata:zeppelin AND (dog OR  merle)+Text_English:zeppelin AND
 (dog
 OR merle)+Text_German:(zeppelin AND  (dog OR merle))
 
 or repeat the entire query text for all three major  fields in the 'fq'
 clause (assuming we want to use the  cache):
 
 q=*:*fq=(+All_Metadata:zeppelin AND (dog OR 
 merle)+Text_English:zeppelin
 AND (dog OR merle)+Text_German:zeppelin AND (dog  OR merle))
 
 ?
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 -- 
 View this message in  context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Understanding-multi-field-queries-with-q-and-fq-tp2528866p2528866.html

 Sent  from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Understanding-multi-field-queries-with-q-and-fq-tp2528866p2596242.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Basic Dismax syntax question

Say I have an index with first_name and last_name fields, and also a copy
field for the full name called full_name.  Say I add two employees:
Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon Dynamite.

If I search for just the first or last name, or both names, with mm=1, I get
the expected results:

q=NapoleondefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1  // 2
results
q=BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 // 2
results
q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1
// 2 results


However, if I try to search for both names with mm=2 (which I think means
term1 AND term2), I get 0 results:

q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2
// 0 results
q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=full_namemm=2 // 0
results

I also see this when I put all fields (including the copy field) into the qf
parameter.


Thoughts?


Thanks!


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2596768.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Basic Dismax syntax question

2011-02-28 Thread Tanner Postert

i noticed that your search terms are using caps vs lower case, are your
search fields perhaps not set to lowercase the terms and/or the search
term?

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Say I have an index with first_name and last_name fields, and also a copy
 field for the full name called full_name.  Say I add two employees:
 Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon Dynamite.

 If I search for just the first or last name, or both names, with mm=1, I
 get
 the expected results:

 q=NapoleondefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1  // 2
 results
 q=BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 // 2
 results

 q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1
 // 2 results


 However, if I try to search for both names with mm=2 (which I think means
 term1 AND term2), I get 0 results:


 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2
// 0 results
 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=full_namemm=2 // 0
 results

 I also see this when I put all fields (including the copy field) into the
 qf
 parameter.


 Thoughts?


 Thanks!


 --
 View this message in context:
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2596768.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Solr Payloads retrieval

2011-02-28 Thread Fabiano Nunes

Hi!

I'm studying a migration from pure Lucene to Solr, but I need a crucial
feature:
Is it posible to retrieve payloads from Solr?

I'm storing the coordinates from each term in its payload to highlight
images in client-side.

Thank you,

Re: Problems with JSP pages?

2011-02-28 Thread Chris Hostetter


: I'm on Windows Vista, using the trunk. Some of the JSP pages do not
: execute, but instead Jetty downloads them.
: 
: solr/admin/get-properties.jsp for example. This is called by the 'JAVA
: PROPERTIES' button in the main admin page.
: 
: Is this a known problem/quirk for Windows? Or fallout from a jetty
: change? Or...?

I can't reproduce using trunk or 3x (as of r1075445)

can any one else reproduce this on windows?

Lance: anything interesting in the logs from jetty?  are you using the 
plain vanilla solr example or something else?


-Hoss

setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

So I think I ought to be able to set up a particular solr core to use a 
different file for solrconfig.xml.


(The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and slave in 
replication have the exact same repo checkout for their conf directory, 
but have the master using a different solrconfig.xml, one set up to be 
master.)


Solr 1.4.1, using this for guidance: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin

But no matter what I try, while I get no errors in the log file (should 
I be looking for errors somewhere else?), the core doesn't successfully 
come up.


I am trying in the solr.xml, to do this:

core name=master_prod instanceDir=master_prod 
config=master-solrconfig.xml

property name=dataDir value=/opt/solr/solr_indexer/master_prod/data /
/core

Or I try this instead:

core name=master_prod instanceDir=master_prod 
config=master-solrconfig.xml

property name=dataDir value=/opt/solr/solr_indexer/master_prod/data /
property name=configName value=master-solrconfig.xml /
/core

With either of these, in the log file things look like they started up 
succesfully but it doesn't appear to actually be so, the core is 
actually inaccessible. Maybe there's an error in my 
master-solrconfig.xml, but I don't think so, and there's nothing in the 
log on that either.  Or maybe I'm not doing things right as far as 
telling it to use the 'config file' solrconfig.xml in a different location.


Can anyone confirm for me that this is possible, and what the right way 
to try and do it is?

Search Result from Multiple Cores

2011-02-28 Thread pankaj bhatt

Hi All,
   Can anyone please help me in getting the results from multiple cores (
all cores maintain there separate indexes, no sharding).
  Suppose I had three cores: -   Core A ( SQL Server DB), Core B (
FileSystem), Core C (MySQL)

  if i search for word Java then the combined results from all the cores
should come up ordering by their ranking. I even found a patch for this in
JIRA but the issue is still unresolved.

 Can any of you, please help me.

/ Pankaj

Re: Basic Dismax syntax question

--- On Mon, 2/28/11, mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com
 Subject: Basic Dismax syntax question
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Date: Monday, February 28, 2011, 7:41 PM
 Say I have an index with first_name
 and last_name fields, and also a copy
 field for the full name called full_name.  Say I add
 two employees:
 Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon Dynamite.

 If I search for just the first or last name, or both names,
 with mm=1, I get
 the expected results:

 q=NapoleondefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 
     // 2
 results
 q=BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 
    // 2
 results
 q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1
 // 2 results

 However, if I try to search for both names with mm=2 (which
 I think means
 term1 AND term2), I get 0 results:

 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2
     // 0 results
 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=full_namemm=2 
    // 0
 results

 I also see this when I put all fields (including the copy
 field) into the qf
 parameter.

debugQuery=on will dump useful information. What is the field types of 
first_name, last_name and full_name? 

What happens when you query first letter uppercased?

q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2

Re: Solr Payloads retrieval

2011-02-28 Thread Sujit Pal

Yes, check out the field type payloads in the schema.xml file. If you
set up one or more of your fields as type payloads (you would use the
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilterFactory during indexing in your analyzer
chain), you can then use the PayloadTermQuery to query it with, scoring
can be done with a custom PayloadSimilarity implementation. Check out
this (slightly dated) article for more information.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/ 

-sujit

On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 14:49 -0300, Fabiano Nunes wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I'm studying a migration from pure Lucene to Solr, but I need a crucial
 feature:
 Is it posible to retrieve payloads from Solr?
 
 I'm storing the coordinates from each term in its payload to highlight
 images in client-side.
 
 Thank you,

Re: Basic Dismax syntax question

They're all set to LC.  I was just coming up with a safe example to post.  

It sounds like you don't see an issue with the syntax we're using?

Thanks


tjpoe wrote:
 
 i noticed that your search terms are using caps vs lower case, are your
 search fields perhaps not set to lowercase the terms and/or the search
 term?
 
 On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Say I have an index with first_name and last_name fields, and also a copy
 field for the full name called full_name.  Say I add two employees:
 Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon Dynamite.

 If I search for just the first or last name, or both names, with mm=1, I
 get
 the expected results:

 q=NapoleondefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1  //
 2
 results
 q=BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 //
 2
 results

 q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1
 // 2 results


 However, if I try to search for both names with mm=2 (which I think means
 term1 AND term2), I get 0 results:


 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2
// 0 results
 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=full_namemm=2 // 0
 results

 I also see this when I put all fields (including the copy field) into the
 qf
 parameter.


 Thoughts?


 Thanks!


 --
 View this message in context:
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2596768.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2597447.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?

2011-02-28 Thread Andreas Kemkes

Chris:

Yes, I only see the output below.

I'm familiar with the information in 
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler, except for 
the tika.config part, which I haven't touched.

Even when running documents through Tika directly, the output of metadata is 
highly dependent on what metadata the document contains (obviously).  I haven't 
found the right place in the Tika source code yet either.  Would digging into 
POI, PDFBox, ... help me any further on my pursuit?  A Matrix that lists the 
complete set of metadata for the most popular formats would sure be helpful to 
me.  I would help providing it, if properly directed.

Thanks,

Andreas

PS: I've also noticed some differences in the date formats being used (using 
version 0.9).  Is that something I should be concerned about when using it 
through SolrCell?

meta name=Creation-Date content=Mon May 17 10:10:15 PDT 2010/ (from a 
Word 
document)
meta name=Creation-Date content=2011-01-03T18:45:50Z/ (from a PDF)





From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 4:11:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tika metadata extracted per supported document format?

Hi Andreas,

 java -jar tika-app-0.9.jar --list-met-models
 TikaMetadataKeys
 PROTECTED
 RESOURCE_NAME_KEY
 TikaMimeKeys
 MIME_TYPE_MAGIC
 TIKA_MIME_FILE
 
 Both 0.8 and 0.9 give me the same list.  Is that a configuration issue?

Strange -- those are the only met models you're seeing listed?

 
 I'm a bit unclear if that gets me to what I was looking for - metadata 
 like content_type or last_modified.  Or am I confusing Tika metadata 
 with SolrCell metadata?
 
 I thought SolrCell metadata comes from Tika, or does it not?

It does come from Tika that's for sure, but in SolrCell, there is a 
configuration for the ExtractingRequestHandler that remaps
the field names from Tika to Solr. So that's probably where it's coming from. 
Check this out:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler

HTH!

Cheers,
Chris

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++

Re: Basic Dismax syntax question

Fields are str type.

The issue happens regardless of case.  I just threw in some examples using
names to highlight the issue.  In the actual index, the data is the affected
fields is all LC, and I'm searching in LC.  

Sounds like the syntax looks okay to you? 


Thanks


iorixxx wrote:
 
 
 --- On Mon, 2/28/11, mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 From: mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com
 Subject: Basic Dismax syntax question
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Date: Monday, February 28, 2011, 7:41 PM
 Say I have an index with first_name
 and last_name fields, and also a copy
 field for the full name called full_name.  Say I add
 two employees:
 Napoleon Bonaparte and Napoleon Dynamite.
 
 If I search for just the first or last name, or both names,
 with mm=1, I get
 the expected results:
 
 q=NapoleondefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 
     // 2
 results
 q=BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1 
    // 2
 results
 q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=1
 // 2 results
 
 
 However, if I try to search for both names with mm=2 (which
 I think means
 term1 AND term2), I get 0 results:
 
 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2
     // 0 results
 q=napoleon%20bonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=full_namemm=2 
    // 0
 results
 
 I also see this when I put all fields (including the copy
 field) into the qf
 parameter.
 
 debugQuery=on will dump useful information. What is the field types of
 first_name, last_name and full_name? 
 
 What happens when you query first letter uppercased?
 
 q=Napoleon%20BonapartedefType=dismaxtie=0.1qf=first_name%20last_namemm=2
 
 
 
  
 
 


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2597510.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

 (The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
 slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
 their conf directory, but have the master using a different
 solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)

How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node

please make JSONWriter public

2011-02-28 Thread Paul Libbrecht


Hello fellow SOLR experts,

may I ask to make top-level and public the class 
org.apache.solr.request.JSONWriter
inside
org.apache.solr.request.JSONResponseWriter
I am re-using it to output JSON search result to code that I wish not to change 
on the client but the current visibility settings (JSONWriter is package 
protected) makes it impossible for me without actually copying the code (which 
is possible thanks to the good open-source nature).

thanks in advance

paul

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core


On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:

(The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
their conf directory, but have the master using a different
solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)

How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node



That isn't great, becuase there are more differences in optimal 
solrconfig.xml between master and slave than just the replication 
handler difference, which that URL covers.


A master (which won't be queried against) doesn't need spellcheck 
running after commits, but the slave does. A master doesn't need slow 
newsearcher/firstsearcher query warm-ups, but the slave does. The master 
may be better with different (lower) cache settings, since it won't be 
used to service live queries.


The documentation clearly suggests it _ought_ to be possible to tell a 
core the name of it's config file (default solrconfig.xml) to be 
something other than solrconfig.xml -- but I havent' been able to make 
it work, and find the lack of any errors in the log file when it's not 
working to be frustrating.


Has anyone actually done this? Can anyone confirm that it's even 
possible, and the documentation isn't just taking me for a ride?

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working,
when it's not working:

INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/66 config=null

config=null, that's not right. When I try to over-ride the config file
name in solr.xml core config, I can't seem to put a name in there that
works to find a file that does actually exist. Unless I put the name
solrconfig.xml in there, then it works fine, heh.

On 2/28/2011 3:00 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:

(The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
their conf directory, but have the master using a different
solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)

How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node

That isn't great, becuase there are more differences in optimal
solrconfig.xml between master and slave than just the replication
handler difference, which that URL covers.

A master (which won't be queried against) doesn't need spellcheck
running after commits, but the slave does. A master doesn't need slow
newsearcher/firstsearcher query warm-ups, but the slave does. The master
may be better with different (lower) cache settings, since it won't be
used to service live queries.

The documentation clearly suggests it _ought_ to be possible to tell a
core the name of it's config file (default solrconfig.xml) to be
something other than solrconfig.xml -- but I havent' been able to make
it work, and find the lack of any errors in the log file when it's not
working to be frustrating.

Has anyone actually done this? Can anyone confirm that it's even
possible, and the documentation isn't just taking me for a ride?

RE: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

2011-02-28 Thread Dyer, James

Jonathan,

When I was first setting up replication a couple weeks ago, I had this working, 
as described here: 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replicating_solrconfig.xml

I created the slave's solrconfig.xml and saved it on the master in the conf 
dir as solrconfig_slave.xml, then began the confFiles parameter on the 
master with solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,etc.  And it was 
working (v1.4.1).  I'm not sure why you haven't had good luck with this but you 
can at least know it is possible to get it to work.

I think to get the slave up and running for the first time I saved the slave's 
version on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  It then would copy over any changed 
versions of solrconfig_slave.xml from the master to the slave, saving them on 
the slave as solrconfig.xml.  But I primed it by giving it its config file 
in-sync to start with.

I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're 
using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server to 
buy)...

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu] 
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working, 
when it's not working:

INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/66  config=null

config=null, that's not right.  When I try to over-ride the config file 
name in solr.xml core config, I can't seem to put a name in there that 
works to find a file that does actually exist.  Unless I put the name 
solrconfig.xml in there, then it works fine, heh.



On 2/28/2011 3:00 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
 On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
 (The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
 slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
 their conf directory, but have the master using a different
 solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)
 How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node

 That isn't great, becuase there are more differences in optimal
 solrconfig.xml between master and slave than just the replication
 handler difference, which that URL covers.

 A master (which won't be queried against) doesn't need spellcheck
 running after commits, but the slave does. A master doesn't need slow
 newsearcher/firstsearcher query warm-ups, but the slave does. The master
 may be better with different (lower) cache settings, since it won't be
 used to service live queries.

 The documentation clearly suggests it _ought_ to be possible to tell a
 core the name of it's config file (default solrconfig.xml) to be
 something other than solrconfig.xml -- but I havent' been able to make
 it work, and find the lack of any errors in the log file when it's not
 working to be frustrating.

 Has anyone actually done this? Can anyone confirm that it's even
 possible, and the documentation isn't just taking me for a ride?

Re: Problem with Solr and Nutch integration

2011-02-28 Thread Paul Rogers

Hi Anurag

Thanks for the prompt reply.

I'm following the tutorial at

http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/

I have built solr and the example and added it to Tomcat as per

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat

and this (solr-example) all appears to work fine (I can access the solr
admin page at 
http://localhost:8080/solr-example/admin/http://sol001:8080/solr-example/admin/
and
search using the same).

I have copied the nutch schema.xml across and replaced the example one.
 Again everything seems to work fine.

However when I add the request handler:

requestHandler name=/nutch class=solr.SearchHandler 
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
float name=tie0.01/float
str name=qf
content^0.5 anchor^1.0 title^1.2
/str
str name=pf
content^0.5 anchor^1.5 title^1.2 site^1.5
/str
str name=fl
url
/str
str name=mm
2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%
/str
int name=ps100/int
bool hl=true/
str name=q.alt*:*/str
str name=hl.fltitle url content/str
str name=f.title.hl.fragsize0/str
str name=f.title.hl.alternateFieldtitle/str
str name=f.url.hl.fragsize0/str
str name=f.url.hl.alternateFieldurl/str
str name=f.content.hl.fragmenterregex/str
/lst
/requestHandler


and restart the solr-example app under tomcat I get the following error:

HTTP Status 404 - missing core name in path
--

*type* Status report

*message* *missing core name in path*

*description* *The requested resource (missing core name in path) is not
available.*
*
*
As soon as I comment out the request handler the example appears to work
again.

From the previous mentioned post I understand that this error is masking the
actual error and I need to check the logs.  However I'm unsure exactly where
these are located.

I was hoping if I could post them It'd allow you guys to suggest a solution.

Many thanks


Paul
On 28 February 2011 11:37, Anurag anurag.it.jo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Solr uses jetty server  default, do u know that? you can run solr server
 without using Tomcat (using jetty server).
 Please describe the steps that led to the error. Which command u executed?

Re: How to handle special character in filter query

2011-02-28 Thread cyang2010

Thanks you both.

In order to get it (e.g.  filter query  -- http://...fq:genres=ACTION 
ADVENTURE) work in browser, i have to explicitly put url encode for special
character, regardless what following solution i use:

1. Using double quote on filter query field 

2. Using escape on special character.  In my case, it is white space and 
within the ACTION  ADVENTURE


3. Using raw query Qparser


It looks like someone already asked the question before and get answered:

http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fq-field-with-facets-td2559948.html


Thanks for your help.



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-handle-special-character-in-filter-query-tp2579978p2598130.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Problem with sorting using functions.

2011-02-28 Thread John Sherwood

This works:
/select/?q=*:*sort=price desc

This throws a 400 error:
/select/?q=*:*sort=sum(1, 1) desc

Missing sort order.

I'm using 1.4.2.  I've tried all sorts of different numbers, functions, and
fields but nothing seems to change that error.  Any ideas?

Indexed, but cannot search

2011-02-28 Thread Brian Lamb

Hi all,

I was able to get my installation of Solr indexed using dataimport. However,
I cannot seem to get search working. I can verify that the data is there by
going to:

http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on

This gives me the response: result name=response numFound=234961
start=0

But when I go to

http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=dogversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on

I get the response: result name=response numFound=0 start=0

I know that dog should return some results because it is the first result
when I select all the records. So what am I doing incorrectly that would
prevent me from seeing results?

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Yeah, I'm actually _not_ trying to get replication to copy over the 
config files.  Instead, I'm assuming the config files are all there, and 
I'm actually trying to get one of the cores to _use_ a file that 
actually on disk in that core is called, eg, solrconfig_slave.xml.


This wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin

suggests I _ought_ to be able to do that, to tell a particular core to 
use a config file of any name I want. But I'm having trouble getting it 
to work. But that could be my own local mistake of some kind too. Just 
makes it harder to figure out when I'm not even exactly sure how you're 
_supposed_ to be able to do that -- CoreAdmin wiki page implies at least 
two different ways you should be able to do it, but doesn't include an 
actual example so I'm not sure if I'm understanding what it's implying 
correctly -- or if the actual 1.4.1 behavior matches what's in that wiki 
page anyway.


On 2/28/2011 3:14 PM, Dyer, James wrote:

Jonathan,

When I was first setting up replication a couple weeks ago, I had this working, 
as described here: 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replicating_solrconfig.xml

I created the slave's solrconfig.xml and saved it on the master in the conf dir as 
solrconfig_slave.xml, then began the confFiles parameter on the master with 
solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,etc.  And it was working (v1.4.1).  I'm not sure why you haven't had 
good luck with this but you can at least know it is possible to get it to work.

I think to get the slave up and running for the first time I saved the slave's version on the slave as 
solrconfig.xml.  It then would copy over any changed versions of solrconfig_slave.xml 
from the master to the slave, saving them on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  But I primed it by 
giving it its config file in-sync to start with.

I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're 
using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server to 
buy)...

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working,
when it's not working:

INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/66  config=null

config=null, that's not right.  When I try to over-ride the config file
name in solr.xml core config, I can't seem to put a name in there that
works to find a file that does actually exist.  Unless I put the name
solrconfig.xml in there, then it works fine, heh.



On 2/28/2011 3:00 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:

(The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
their conf directory, but have the master using a different
solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)

How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node


That isn't great, becuase there are more differences in optimal
solrconfig.xml between master and slave than just the replication
handler difference, which that URL covers.

A master (which won't be queried against) doesn't need spellcheck
running after commits, but the slave does. A master doesn't need slow
newsearcher/firstsearcher query warm-ups, but the slave does. The master
may be better with different (lower) cache settings, since it won't be
used to service live queries.

The documentation clearly suggests it _ought_ to be possible to tell a
core the name of it's config file (default solrconfig.xml) to be
something other than solrconfig.xml -- but I havent' been able to make
it work, and find the lack of any errors in the log file when it's not
working to be frustrating.

Has anyone actually done this? Can anyone confirm that it's even
possible, and the documentation isn't just taking me for a ride?

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Aha, wait, I think I've made it work, as simple as this in the solr.xml 
core config, to make a core use a solrconfig.xml file with a different name:


... core name=master_prod instanceDir=master_prod 
config=master-solrconfig.xml ...


Not sure why that didn't work the first half a dozen times I tried. May 
have had a syntax error in my master-solrconfig.xml file, even though 
the Solr log files didn't report any, maybe when there's a syntax error 
Solr just silently gives up on the config file and presents an empty 
index, I dunno.


On 2/28/2011 3:46 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

Yeah, I'm actually _not_ trying to get replication to copy over the
config files.  Instead, I'm assuming the config files are all there, and
I'm actually trying to get one of the cores to _use_ a file that
actually on disk in that core is called, eg, solrconfig_slave.xml.

This wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin

suggests I _ought_ to be able to do that, to tell a particular core to
use a config file of any name I want. But I'm having trouble getting it
to work. But that could be my own local mistake of some kind too. Just
makes it harder to figure out when I'm not even exactly sure how you're
_supposed_ to be able to do that -- CoreAdmin wiki page implies at least
two different ways you should be able to do it, but doesn't include an
actual example so I'm not sure if I'm understanding what it's implying
correctly -- or if the actual 1.4.1 behavior matches what's in that wiki
page anyway.

On 2/28/2011 3:14 PM, Dyer, James wrote:

Jonathan,

When I was first setting up replication a couple weeks ago, I had this working, 
as described here: 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replicating_solrconfig.xml

I created the slave's solrconfig.xml and saved it on the master in the conf dir as 
solrconfig_slave.xml, then began the confFiles parameter on the master with 
solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,etc.  And it was working (v1.4.1).  I'm not sure why you haven't had 
good luck with this but you can at least know it is possible to get it to work.

I think to get the slave up and running for the first time I saved the slave's version on the slave as 
solrconfig.xml.  It then would copy over any changed versions of solrconfig_slave.xml 
from the master to the slave, saving them on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  But I primed it by 
giving it its config file in-sync to start with.

I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're 
using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server to 
buy)...

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working,
when it's not working:

INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/66  config=null

config=null, that's not right.  When I try to over-ride the config file
name in solr.xml core config, I can't seem to put a name in there that
works to find a file that does actually exist.  Unless I put the name
solrconfig.xml in there, then it works fine, heh.



On 2/28/2011 3:00 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:

(The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
their conf directory, but have the master using a different
solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)

How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node


That isn't great, becuase there are more differences in optimal
solrconfig.xml between master and slave than just the replication
handler difference, which that URL covers.

A master (which won't be queried against) doesn't need spellcheck
running after commits, but the slave does. A master doesn't need slow
newsearcher/firstsearcher query warm-ups, but the slave does. The master
may be better with different (lower) cache settings, since it won't be
used to service live queries.

The documentation clearly suggests it _ought_ to be possible to tell a
core the name of it's config file (default solrconfig.xml) to be
something other than solrconfig.xml -- but I havent' been able to make
it work, and find the lack of any errors in the log file when it's not
working to be frustrating.

Has anyone actually done this? Can anyone confirm that it's even
possible, and the documentation isn't just taking me for a ride?

Sub entities

2011-02-28 Thread Brian Lamb

Hi all,

I was able to get my dataimport to work correctly but I'm a little unclear
as to how the entity within an entity works in regards to search results.
When I do a search for all results, it seems only the outermost responses
are returned. For example, I have the following in my db config file:

dataConfig
  dataSource type=JdbcDataSource name=mystuff batchSize=-1
driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost/db?characterEncoding=UTF8amp;zeroDateTimeBehavior=convertToNull
user=user password=password/
document
  entity name=animal dataSource=mystuff query=SELECT * FROM
animals
field column=id name=id /
field column=type name=type /
field column=genus name=genus /

!-- Add in the species --
entity name=specie_relations dataSource=mystuff query=SELECT
specie_id FROMspecie_relations WHERE animal_id=${animal.id}
  entity name=species dataSource=mystuff query=SELECT specie
FROM species WHERE id=${specie_relations.specie_id}
field column=specie name=specie /
  /entity
/entity
  /entity
/document
  /dataSource
/dataConfig

However, specie never shows up in my search results:

doc
  str name=typeMammal/str
  str name=id1/str
  str name=genusCanis/str
/doc

I had hoped the results would include the species. Can it? If so, what is my
malfunction?

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

And in other news of other possibilities. If I DID want to use the same 
solrconfig.xml for both master and slave, but disable the 
newsearcher/firstsearcher queries on master, it _looks_ like I can use 
the techique here:


http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node

Applied to newsearcher/firstsearcher too:

listener event=firstSearcher class=solr.QuerySenderListener  
enable=${enable.slave:false}


Now that listener will only be turned on if enable.slave is set to true. 
Might make more sense to use a different property value there, like 
enable.searcher or something.


I'm not entirely sure in what places the enable attribute is 
recognized and in what places it isn't, but it LOOKS like it's 
recognized on the listener tag.  I think.



On 2/28/2011 3:52 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

Aha, wait, I think I've made it work, as simple as this in the solr.xml
core config, to make a core use a solrconfig.xml file with a different name:

...core name=master_prod instanceDir=master_prod
config=master-solrconfig.xml  ...

Not sure why that didn't work the first half a dozen times I tried. May
have had a syntax error in my master-solrconfig.xml file, even though
the Solr log files didn't report any, maybe when there's a syntax error
Solr just silently gives up on the config file and presents an empty
index, I dunno.

On 2/28/2011 3:46 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

Yeah, I'm actually _not_ trying to get replication to copy over the
config files.  Instead, I'm assuming the config files are all there, and
I'm actually trying to get one of the cores to _use_ a file that
actually on disk in that core is called, eg, solrconfig_slave.xml.

This wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin

suggests I _ought_ to be able to do that, to tell a particular core to
use a config file of any name I want. But I'm having trouble getting it
to work. But that could be my own local mistake of some kind too. Just
makes it harder to figure out when I'm not even exactly sure how you're
_supposed_ to be able to do that -- CoreAdmin wiki page implies at least
two different ways you should be able to do it, but doesn't include an
actual example so I'm not sure if I'm understanding what it's implying
correctly -- or if the actual 1.4.1 behavior matches what's in that wiki
page anyway.

On 2/28/2011 3:14 PM, Dyer, James wrote:

Jonathan,

When I was first setting up replication a couple weeks ago, I had this working, 
as described here: 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replicating_solrconfig.xml

I created the slave's solrconfig.xml and saved it on the master in the conf dir as 
solrconfig_slave.xml, then began the confFiles parameter on the master with 
solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,etc.  And it was working (v1.4.1).  I'm not sure why you haven't had 
good luck with this but you can at least know it is possible to get it to work.

I think to get the slave up and running for the first time I saved the slave's version on the slave as 
solrconfig.xml.  It then would copy over any changed versions of solrconfig_slave.xml 
from the master to the slave, saving them on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  But I primed it by 
giving it its config file in-sync to start with.

I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're 
using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server to 
buy)...

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working,
when it's not working:

INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/66  config=null

config=null, that's not right.  When I try to over-ride the config file
name in solr.xml core config, I can't seem to put a name in there that
works to find a file that does actually exist.  Unless I put the name
solrconfig.xml in there, then it works fine, heh.



On 2/28/2011 3:00 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:

(The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and
slave in replication have the exact same repo checkout for
their conf directory, but have the master using a different
solrconfig.xml, one set up to be master.)

How about using same solrconfig.xml for master too? As described here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node


That isn't great, becuase there are more differences in optimal
solrconfig.xml between master and slave than just the replication
handler difference, which that URL covers.

A master (which won't be queried against) doesn't need spellcheck
running after commits, but the slave does. A master doesn't need slow
newsearcher/firstsearcher query warm-ups, but the slave does. The master
may be better with

Re: Problem with Solr and Nutch integration

2011-02-28 Thread Anurag

The above mentioned requesthandler lies in schema file or solrconfig file
of Solr?
I integrated solr and nutch and requesthandler lies in SolrConfig.xml.

This is my some content of my solrconfig.xml. As far as Jetty server is
concerned its working, don't know about solrtomcat.


requestHandler name=/nutch class=solr.SearchHandler 
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
float name=tie0.01/float
str name=qf
content^0.5 anchor^1.0 title^1.2
/str
str name=pf
content^0.5 anchor^1.5 title^1.2 site^1.5
/str
str name=fl
url
/str
str name=mm
2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%
/str
int name=ps100/int
bool hl=true/
str name=q.alt*:*/str
str name=hl.fltitle url content/str
str name=f.title.hl.fragsize0/str
str name=f.title.hl.alternateFieldtitle/str
str name=f.url.hl.fragsize0/str
str name=f.url.hl.alternateFieldurl/str
str name=f.content.hl.fragmenterregex/str
/lst
/requestHandler
requestHandler name=/nutch class=solr.SearchHandler 
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
float name=tie0.01/float
str name=qf
content^0.5 anchor^1.0 title^1.2
/str
str name=pf
content^0.5 anchor^1.5 title^1.2 site^1.5
/str
str name=fl
url
/str
str name=mm
2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%
/str
int name=ps100/int
bool hl=true/
str name=q.alt*:*/str
str name=hl.fltitle url content/str
str name=f.title.hl.fragsize0/str
str name=f.title.hl.alternateFieldtitle/str
str name=f.url.hl.fragsize0/str
str name=f.url.hl.alternateFieldurl/str
str name=f.content.hl.fragmenterregex/str
/lst
/requestHandler



But yeah deploying solr.war file in tomcat 6 on  my system works.


On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Paul Rogers [via Lucene] 
ml-node+2598137-98595181-146...@n3.nabble.com wrote:

 Hi Anurag

 Thanks for the prompt reply.

 I'm following the tutorial at

 http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/

 I have built solr and the example and added it to Tomcat as per

 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat

 and this (solr-example) all appears to work fine (I can access the solr
 admin page at http://localhost:8080/solr-example/admin/
 http://sol001:8080/solr-example/admin/
 and
 search using the same).

 I have copied the nutch schema.xml across and replaced the example one.
  Again everything seems to work fine.

 However when I add the request handler:

 requestHandler name=/nutch class=solr.SearchHandler 
 lst name=defaults
 str name=defTypedismax/str
 str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
 float name=tie0.01/float
 str name=qf
 content^0.5 anchor^1.0 title^1.2
 /str
 str name=pf
 content^0.5 anchor^1.5 title^1.2 site^1.5
 /str
 str name=fl
 url
 /str
 str name=mm
 2-1 5-2 690%
 /str
 int name=ps100/int
 bool hl=true/
 str name=q.alt*:*/str
 str name=hl.fltitle url content/str
 str name=f.title.hl.fragsize0/str
 str name=f.title.hl.alternateFieldtitle/str
 str name=f.url.hl.fragsize0/str
 str name=f.url.hl.alternateFieldurl/str
 str name=f.content.hl.fragmenterregex/str
 /lst
 /requestHandler


 and restart the solr-example app under tomcat I get the following error:

 HTTP Status 404 - missing core name in path
 --

 *type* Status report

 *message* *missing core name in path*

 *description* *The requested resource (missing core name in path) is not
 available.*
 *
 *
 As soon as I comment out the request handler the example appears to work
 again.

 From the previous mentioned post I understand that this error is masking
 the
 actual error and I need to check the logs.  However I'm unsure exactly
 where
 these are located.

 I was hoping if I could post them It'd allow you guys to suggest a
 solution.

 Many thanks


 Paul
 On 28 February 2011 11:37, Anurag [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2598137i=0
 wrote:

  Solr uses jetty server  default, do u know that? you can run solr server
  without using Tomcat (using jetty server).
  Please describe the steps that led to the error. Which command u
 executed?
 
 


 --
  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
 below:

 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Solr-and-Nutch-integration-tp2590334p2598137.html
  To start a new topic under Solr - User, email
 ml-node+472068-1941297125-146...@n3.nabble.com
 To unsubscribe from Solr - User, click 
 herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=472068code=YW51cmFnLml0LmpvbGx5QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0NzIwNjh8LTIwOTgzNDQxOTY=.





-- 
Kumar Anurag


-
Kumar Anurag

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Solr-and-Nutch-integration-tp2590334p2598526.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

2011-02-28 Thread Dyer, James

Just did a quick search for ' enable= ' in the 1.4.1 source.  Looks like from 
the example solrconfig.xml, both searchComponent and requestHandler tags 
can take the enable attribute.  Its only shown with the ClusteringComponent 
so I'm not sure if just any SC or RH will honor it.  Also see the unit test 
TestPluginEnable.java, which seems to show that the StandardRequestHandler 
will honor it.

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311


-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu] 
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

And in other news of other possibilities. If I DID want to use the same 
solrconfig.xml for both master and slave, but disable the 
newsearcher/firstsearcher queries on master, it _looks_ like I can use 
the techique here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node

Applied to newsearcher/firstsearcher too:

listener event=firstSearcher class=solr.QuerySenderListener  
enable=${enable.slave:false}

Now that listener will only be turned on if enable.slave is set to true. 
Might make more sense to use a different property value there, like 
enable.searcher or something.

I'm not entirely sure in what places the enable attribute is 
recognized and in what places it isn't, but it LOOKS like it's 
recognized on the listener tag.  I think.


On 2/28/2011 3:52 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
 Aha, wait, I think I've made it work, as simple as this in the solr.xml
 core config, to make a core use a solrconfig.xml file with a different name:

 ...core name=master_prod instanceDir=master_prod
 config=master-solrconfig.xml  ...

 Not sure why that didn't work the first half a dozen times I tried. May
 have had a syntax error in my master-solrconfig.xml file, even though
 the Solr log files didn't report any, maybe when there's a syntax error
 Solr just silently gives up on the config file and presents an empty
 index, I dunno.

 On 2/28/2011 3:46 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
 Yeah, I'm actually _not_ trying to get replication to copy over the
 config files.  Instead, I'm assuming the config files are all there, and
 I'm actually trying to get one of the cores to _use_ a file that
 actually on disk in that core is called, eg, solrconfig_slave.xml.

 This wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin

 suggests I _ought_ to be able to do that, to tell a particular core to
 use a config file of any name I want. But I'm having trouble getting it
 to work. But that could be my own local mistake of some kind too. Just
 makes it harder to figure out when I'm not even exactly sure how you're
 _supposed_ to be able to do that -- CoreAdmin wiki page implies at least
 two different ways you should be able to do it, but doesn't include an
 actual example so I'm not sure if I'm understanding what it's implying
 correctly -- or if the actual 1.4.1 behavior matches what's in that wiki
 page anyway.

 On 2/28/2011 3:14 PM, Dyer, James wrote:
 Jonathan,

 When I was first setting up replication a couple weeks ago, I had this 
 working, as described here: 
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replicating_solrconfig.xml

 I created the slave's solrconfig.xml and saved it on the master in the 
 conf dir as solrconfig_slave.xml, then began the confFiles parameter 
 on the master with solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,etc.  
 And it was working (v1.4.1).  I'm not sure why you haven't had good luck 
 with this but you can at least know it is possible to get it to work.

 I think to get the slave up and running for the first time I saved the 
 slave's version on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  It then would copy over 
 any changed versions of solrconfig_slave.xml from the master to the 
 slave, saving them on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  But I primed it by 
 giving it its config file in-sync to start with.

 I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're 
 using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server 
 to buy)...

 James Dyer
 E-Commerce Systems
 Ingram Content Group
 (615) 213-4311

 -Original Message-
 From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
 Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:03 PM
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

 Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working,
 when it's not working:

 INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/66  config=null

 config=null, that's not right.  When I try to over-ride the config file
 name in solr.xml core config, I can't seem to put a name in there that
 works to find a file that does actually exist.  Unless I put the name
 solrconfig.xml in there, then it works fine, heh.



 On 2/28/2011 3:00 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
 On 2/28/2011 1:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
 (The reason I want to do this is so I can have master and

Re: Problem with sorting using functions.

2011-02-28 Thread Geert-Jan Brits

sort by functionquery is only available from solr 3.1 (from :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function)


2011/2/28 John Sherwood j...@storecrowd.com

 This works:
 /select/?q=*:*sort=price desc

 This throws a 400 error:
 /select/?q=*:*sort=sum(1, 1) desc

 Missing sort order.

 I'm using 1.4.2.  I've tried all sorts of different numbers, functions, and
 fields but nothing seems to change that error.  Any ideas?

Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Hmm, I'm pretty sure I'm seeing that listener can take an 'enable' 
attribute too.  Even though that's not a searchComponent or a 
requestComponent, is it?


After toggling enable back on forth on a listener and restarting Solr 
and watching my logs closely, I am as confident as I can be that it 
mysteriously is being respected on listener. Go figure.


Convenient for me, because I wanted to disable my expensive and 
timeconsuming newSearcher/firstSearcher warming queries on a core marked 
'master'.


On 2/28/2011 4:21 PM, Dyer, James wrote:

Just did a quick search for ' enable= ' in the 1.4.1 source.  Looks like from the example solrconfig.xml, 
bothsearchComponent  andrequestHandler  tags can take the enable attribute.  Its only shown with 
the ClusteringComponent so I'm not sure if just any SC or RH will honor it.  Also see the unit test 
TestPluginEnable.java, which seems to show that the StandardRequestHandler will honor it.

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311


-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

And in other news of other possibilities. If I DID want to use the same
solrconfig.xml for both master and slave, but disable the
newsearcher/firstsearcher queries on master, it _looks_ like I can use
the techique here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node

Applied to newsearcher/firstsearcher too:

listener event=firstSearcher class=solr.QuerySenderListener
enable=${enable.slave:false}

Now that listener will only be turned on if enable.slave is set to true.
Might make more sense to use a different property value there, like
enable.searcher or something.

I'm not entirely sure in what places the enable attribute is
recognized and in what places it isn't, but it LOOKS like it's
recognized on thelistener  tag.  I think.


On 2/28/2011 3:52 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

Aha, wait, I think I've made it work, as simple as this in the solr.xml
core config, to make a core use a solrconfig.xml file with a different name:

...core name=master_prod instanceDir=master_prod
config=master-solrconfig.xml   ...

Not sure why that didn't work the first half a dozen times I tried. May
have had a syntax error in my master-solrconfig.xml file, even though
the Solr log files didn't report any, maybe when there's a syntax error
Solr just silently gives up on the config file and presents an empty
index, I dunno.

On 2/28/2011 3:46 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

Yeah, I'm actually _not_ trying to get replication to copy over the
config files.  Instead, I'm assuming the config files are all there, and
I'm actually trying to get one of the cores to _use_ a file that
actually on disk in that core is called, eg, solrconfig_slave.xml.

This wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin

suggests I _ought_ to be able to do that, to tell a particular core to
use a config file of any name I want. But I'm having trouble getting it
to work. But that could be my own local mistake of some kind too. Just
makes it harder to figure out when I'm not even exactly sure how you're
_supposed_ to be able to do that -- CoreAdmin wiki page implies at least
two different ways you should be able to do it, but doesn't include an
actual example so I'm not sure if I'm understanding what it's implying
correctly -- or if the actual 1.4.1 behavior matches what's in that wiki
page anyway.

On 2/28/2011 3:14 PM, Dyer, James wrote:

Jonathan,

When I was first setting up replication a couple weeks ago, I had this working, 
as described here: 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replicating_solrconfig.xml

I created the slave's solrconfig.xml and saved it on the master in the conf dir as 
solrconfig_slave.xml, then began the confFiles parameter on the master with 
solrconfig_slave.xml:solrconfig.xml,schema.xml,etc.  And it was working (v1.4.1).  I'm not sure why you haven't had 
good luck with this but you can at least know it is possible to get it to work.

I think to get the slave up and running for the first time I saved the slave's version on the slave as 
solrconfig.xml.  It then would copy over any changed versions of solrconfig_slave.xml 
from the master to the slave, saving them on the slave as solrconfig.xml.  But I primed it by 
giving it its config file in-sync to start with.

I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're 
using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server to 
buy)...

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: setting different solrconfig.xml for a core

Okay, I did manage to find a clue from the log that it's not working,
when it's

Re: Problem with sorting using functions.

2011-02-28 Thread John Sherwood

Fair call.  Thanks.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Geert-Jan Brits gbr...@gmail.com wrote:

 sort by functionquery is only available from solr 3.1 (from :
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function)


 2011/2/28 John Sherwood j...@storecrowd.com

  This works:
  /select/?q=*:*sort=price desc
 
  This throws a 400 error:
  /select/?q=*:*sort=sum(1, 1) desc
 
  Missing sort order.
 
  I'm using 1.4.2.  I've tried all sorts of different numbers, functions,
 and
  fields but nothing seems to change that error.  Any ideas?

suggestion: do not require masterUrl for slave config

Suggestion, curious what other people think of it, if I should bother 
filing a JIRA and/or trying to come up with a patch.


Currently, when you configure a replication lst name=slave, you HAVE 
to give it a masterUrl.


SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: 'masterUrl' is required 
for a slave

at org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller.init(SnapPuller.java:126)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.ReplicationHandler.inform(ReplicationHandler.java:775)
at 
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.inform(SolrResourceLoader.java:508)

at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.init(SolrCore.java:588)


At first this makes sense, why would you want a slave without a 
masterUrl?  But since you can supply the masterUrl as a query parameter 
in /replication?command=fetchIndexmasterUrl=X, there's really no reason 
to require you to specify it in the solrconfig.xml, if you are planning 
on not having automatic polling, but just triggering replication 
manually, and supplying the masterUrl in the command every time.   This 
can sometimes be convenient for letting some other monitor process 
decide when and how to replicate, instead of having solr itself be 
configured for pulling via polling.


Does that make any sense?

Re: Problem with sorting using functions.

2011-02-28 Thread John Sherwood

Fair call.  Thanks.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Geert-Jan Brits gbr...@gmail.com wrote:
 sort by functionquery is only available from solr 3.1 (from :
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function)


 2011/2/28 John Sherwood j...@storecrowd.com

 This works:
 /select/?q=*:*sort=price desc

 This throws a 400 error:
 /select/?q=*:*sort=sum(1, 1) desc

 Missing sort order.

 I'm using 1.4.2.  I've tried all sorts of different numbers, functions, and
 fields but nothing seems to change that error.  Any ideas?

multi-core solr, specifying the data directory

Unless I'm doing something wrong, in my experience in multi-core Solr in 
1.4.1, you NEED to explicitly provide an absolute path to the 'data' dir.


I set up multi-core like this:

cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=some_core instanceDir=some_core
/core
/cores


Now, setting instanceDir like that works for Solr to look for the 'conf' 
directory in the default location you'd expect, ./some_core/conf.


You'd expect it to look for the 'data' dir for an index in 
./some_core/data too, by default.  But it does not seem to. It's still 
looking for the 'data' directory in the _main_ solr.home/data, not under 
the relevant core directory.


The only way I can manage to get it to look for the /data directory 
where I expect is to spell it out with a full absolute path:


core name=some_core instanceDir=some_core
property name=dataDir value=/path/to/main/solr/some_core/data /
/core

And then in the solrconfig.xml do a dataDir${dataDir}/dataDir

Is this what everyone else does too? Or am I missing a better way of 
doing this?  I would have thought it would just work, with Solr by 
default looking for a ./data subdir of the specified instanceDir.  But 
it definitely doesn't seem to do that.


Should it? Anyone know if Solr in trunk past 1.4.1 has been changed to 
do what I expect? Or am I wrong to expect it? Or does everyone else do 
multi-core in some different way than me where this doesn't come up?


Jonathan

Re: Indexed, but cannot search

2011-02-28 Thread Upayavira

q=dog is equivalent to q=text:dog (where the default search field is
defined as text at the bottom of schema.xml).

If you want to specify a different field, well, you need to tell it :-)

Is that it?

Upayavira

On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:38 -0500, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I was able to get my installation of Solr indexed using dataimport.
 However,
 I cannot seem to get search working. I can verify that the data is there
 by
 going to:
 
 http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
 
 This gives me the response: result name=response numFound=234961
 start=0
 
 But when I go to
 
 http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=dogversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
 
 I get the response: result name=response numFound=0 start=0
 
 I know that dog should return some results because it is the first result
 when I select all the records. So what am I doing incorrectly that would
 prevent me from seeing results?
 
--- 
Enterprise Search Consultant at Sourcesense UK, 
Making Sense of Open Source

Disabling caching for fq param?

Based on what I've read here and what I could find on the web, it seems that
each fq clause essentially gets its own results cache.  Is that correct?

We have a corporate policy of passing the user's Oracle OLS labels into the
index in order to be matched against the labels field.  I currently separate
this from the user's query text by sticking it into an fq param...

?q=user-entered expression
fq=labels:the label values expression
qf=song metadata copy field song lyrics field
tie=0.1
defType=dismax

...but since its value (a collection of hundreds of label values) only apply
to that user, the accompanying result set won't be reusable by other users:

My understanding is that this query will result in two result sets (q and
fq) being cached separately, with the union of the two sets being returned
to the user.  (Is that correct?)

There are thousands of users, each with a unique combination of labels, so
there seems to be little value in caching the result set created from the fq
labels param.  It would be beneficial if there were some kind of fq
parameter override to indicate to Solr to not cache the results?


Thanks!




-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Disabling-caching-for-fq-param-tp2600188p2600188.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Distances in spatial search (Solr 4.0)

2011-02-28 Thread Bill Bell

Use sort with geodist() to sort by distance.

Getting the distance returned us documented on the wiki if you are not using 
score. see reference to _Val_

Bill Bell
Sent from mobile


On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi guys,
 
 We are implementing a separate index on our website, that will be dedicated
 to spatial search.
 I've downloaded a build of Solr 4.0 to try the spatial features and got the
 geodist working really fast.
 
 We now have 2 other features that will be needed on this project:
 1. Returning the distance from the reference point to the search hit (in
 kilometers)
 2. Sorting by the distance.
 
 On item 2, the wiki doc points that a distance function can be used but I
 was not able to find good info on how to accomplish it.
 Also, returning the distance (item 1) is noted as currently being in
 development and there is some workaround to get it.
 
 Anyone had experience with the spatial feature and could help with some
 pointers on how to achieve it?
 
 Thanks,
 Alexandre

RE: Disabling caching for fq param?