OR query
Hi, I have a query that searches through every field to find the text 'london' (constituencies:(london) OR label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) Which works fine, but when I want to filter my results. Say I want to filter down to constituencies that exactly match 'london', but also search the rest of the fields to make sure that the keyword still matches elsewhere (label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (constituencies:london) Sometimes I get zero results because label, name and office don't have the keyword 'london', but I know constituencies does, so results should be 0. But if try: (constituencies:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (label:london) returns results because constituencies is in one of the OR queries. Is there a way to say if none of the OR quires bring back a result at least search the AND? Thanks
Re: OR query
Thanks, I've tried doing lst name=params str name=wtxml/str str name=fq (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0/ and str name=fq+ian +paisley paisley, ian/str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str But neither return any results On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote: Use filter queries to filter or drill down: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fqhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq Also consider using dismax/edismax queries, which are designed to match on any of multiple fields. Also be careful to put a space between each left parenthesis and field name since there is a known bug that causes such queries to fail. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:24 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: OR query Hi, I have a query that searches through every field to find the text 'london' (constituencies:(london) OR label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) Which works fine, but when I want to filter my results. Say I want to filter down to constituencies that exactly match 'london', but also search the rest of the fields to make sure that the keyword still matches elsewhere (label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (constituencies:london) Sometimes I get zero results because label, name and office don't have the keyword 'london', but I know constituencies does, so results should be 0. But if try: (constituencies:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (label:london) returns results because constituencies is in one of the OR queries. Is there a way to say if none of the OR quires bring back a result at least search the AND? Thanks
Re: OR query
I've tried both ways and I still get zero results with this. Even though name_long:paisley, ian will return results. str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote: You're using query and filter query backwards - the query is what you are looking for (the OR), while the filter query is the constraint on the query - the drill down. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:38 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query Thanks, I've tried doing lst name=params str name=wtxml/str str name=fq (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0/ and str name=fq+ian +paisley paisley, ian/str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str But neither return any results On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com **wrote: Use filter queries to filter or drill down: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fqhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http:**//wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fqhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq Also consider using dismax/edismax queries, which are designed to match on any of multiple fields. Also be careful to put a space between each left parenthesis and field name since there is a known bug that causes such queries to fail. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:24 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: OR query Hi, I have a query that searches through every field to find the text 'london' (constituencies:(london) OR label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) Which works fine, but when I want to filter my results. Say I want to filter down to constituencies that exactly match 'london', but also search the rest of the fields to make sure that the keyword still matches elsewhere (label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (constituencies:london) Sometimes I get zero results because label, name and office don't have the keyword 'london', but I know constituencies does, so results should be 0. But if try: (constituencies:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (label:london) returns results because constituencies is in one of the OR queries. Is there a way to say if none of the OR quires bring back a result at least search the AND? Thanks
Re: OR query
My fields are field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true required=true multiValued=false / field name=name type=text_general indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=name_long type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=type type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=label type=text_general indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=label_long type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=date type=date indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=constituencies type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=office type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ And doing str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(+ian +paisley) OR label:(+ian +paisley) OR office:(+ian +paisley)) /str /lst And str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian AND paisley) OR label:(ian AND paisley) OR office:(ian AND paisley)) /str return zero results. However, if I do str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q *:* OR (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str /lst I do get results, but I'm not sure if putting *:* at the start will break things down the line with other queries. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingramcontent.comwrote: If the fields you're querying are of type String (1 token), then you need to escape the whitespace with a backslash, like this: label:ian\ paisley If they are of type Text (multiple tokens), sometimes you need to explicitly insert AND between each token, either with: label:(ian AND paisley) or label:(+ian +paisley) I think this is the case with edismax, which somewhat supports boolean queries but with caveats... You can also turn debugQuery on to figure out why things are not matching. James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Michael Jones [mailto:michaelj...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:48 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query I've tried both ways and I still get zero results with this. Even though name_long:paisley, ian will return results. str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote: You're using query and filter query backwards - the query is what you are looking for (the OR), while the filter query is the constraint on the query - the drill down. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:38 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query Thanks, I've tried doing lst name=params str name=wtxml/str str name=fq (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0/ and str name=fq+ian +paisley paisley, ian/str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str But neither return any results On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com **wrote: Use filter queries to filter or drill down: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http:**//wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq Also consider using dismax/edismax queries, which are designed to match on any of multiple fields. Also be careful to put a space between each left parenthesis and field name since there is a known bug that causes such queries to fail. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:24 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: OR query Hi, I have a query that searches through every field to find the text 'london' (constituencies:(london) OR label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) Which works fine, but when I want to filter my results. Say I want to filter down to constituencies that exactly match 'london', but also search the rest of the fields to make sure that the keyword still matches elsewhere (label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (constituencies:london) Sometimes I get zero results because label, name and office don't have the keyword 'london', but I know constituencies does, so results should be 0. But if try: (constituencies:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (label:london) returns results because constituencies is in one of the OR queries. Is there a way to say if none of the OR quires bring back a result at least search the AND? Thanks
Re: OR query
str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q *:* OR (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str /lst Does actually give me incorrect results for other queries. :( On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Michael Jones michaelj...@gmail.comwrote: My fields are field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true required=true multiValued=false / field name=name type=text_general indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=name_long type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=type type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=label type=text_general indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=label_long type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=date type=date indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=constituencies type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=office type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ And doing str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(+ian +paisley) OR label:(+ian +paisley) OR office:(+ian +paisley)) /str /lst And str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian AND paisley) OR label:(ian AND paisley) OR office:(ian AND paisley)) /str return zero results. However, if I do str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q *:* OR (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str /lst I do get results, but I'm not sure if putting *:* at the start will break things down the line with other queries. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingramcontent.com wrote: If the fields you're querying are of type String (1 token), then you need to escape the whitespace with a backslash, like this: label:ian\ paisley If they are of type Text (multiple tokens), sometimes you need to explicitly insert AND between each token, either with: label:(ian AND paisley) or label:(+ian +paisley) I think this is the case with edismax, which somewhat supports boolean queries but with caveats... You can also turn debugQuery on to figure out why things are not matching. James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Michael Jones [mailto:michaelj...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:48 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query I've tried both ways and I still get zero results with this. Even though name_long:paisley, ian will return results. str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote: You're using query and filter query backwards - the query is what you are looking for (the OR), while the filter query is the constraint on the query - the drill down. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:38 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query Thanks, I've tried doing lst name=params str name=wtxml/str str name=fq (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0/ and str name=fq+ian +paisley paisley, ian/str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str But neither return any results On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com **wrote: Use filter queries to filter or drill down: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http:**//wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq Also consider using dismax/edismax queries, which are designed to match on any of multiple fields. Also be careful to put a space between each left parenthesis and field name since there is a known bug that causes such queries to fail. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:24 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: OR query Hi, I have a query that searches through every field to find the text 'london' (constituencies:(london) OR label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) Which works fine, but when I want to filter my results. Say I want to filter down to constituencies that exactly match 'london', but also search the rest of the fields to make sure that the keyword still matches elsewhere (label:(london) OR name:(london) OR office:(london)) AND (constituencies:london) Sometimes I get zero results because label, name and office don't have the keyword 'london', but I know constituencies does
Re: OR query
Ok, I think I see where the problem is coming from. I do a search for 'ian paisley' over all four fields and get 900 results. And in my returned facets there is 'paisley, ian' in the name facet. If you only search for his name, name_long:paisley, ian - you get 200 results. But if someone does a free text search over the four fields then tries to filter by name then they get zero results because he doesn't exist where his name and label match in the same record. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingramcontent.comwrote: I notice here that both constituencies and office are type string, so these probably have only 1 token. In this case, you need to search with the whitespace escaped with a backslash. Besides this, I'm not entirely sure what more to tell you. You're going to have to verify that some documents with 'name_long:paisley, ian' also contain that name in either constituencies, label, or office. It could be that things aren't being indexed as you think. James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Michael Jones [mailto:michaelj...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:43 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query My fields are field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true required=true multiValued=false / field name=name type=text_general indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=name_long type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=type type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=label type=text_general indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=label_long type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=date type=date indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=constituencies type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=office type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ And doing str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(+ian +paisley) OR label:(+ian +paisley) OR office:(+ian +paisley)) /str /lst And str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian AND paisley) OR label:(ian AND paisley) OR office:(ian AND paisley)) /str return zero results. However, if I do str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q *:* OR (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str /lst I do get results, but I'm not sure if putting *:* at the start will break things down the line with other queries. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingramcontent.comwrote: If the fields you're querying are of type String (1 token), then you need to escape the whitespace with a backslash, like this: label:ian\ paisley If they are of type Text (multiple tokens), sometimes you need to explicitly insert AND between each token, either with: label:(ian AND paisley) or label:(+ian +paisley) I think this is the case with edismax, which somewhat supports boolean queries but with caveats... You can also turn debugQuery on to figure out why things are not matching. James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Michael Jones [mailto:michaelj...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:48 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query I've tried both ways and I still get zero results with this. Even though name_long:paisley, ian will return results. str name=fqname_long:paisley, ian/str str name=q (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote: You're using query and filter query backwards - the query is what you are looking for (the OR), while the filter query is the constraint on the query - the drill down. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Michael Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:38 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: OR query Thanks, I've tried doing lst name=params str name=wtxml/str str name=fq (constituencies:(ian paisley) OR label:(ian paisley) OR office:(ian paisley)) /str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0/ and str name=fq+ian +paisley paisley, ian/str str name=qname_long:paisley, ian/str But neither return any results On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com **wrote: Use filter queries to filter or drill down: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http:**//wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#fq http://wiki.apache.org/solr
Re: fieldtype for name
Thanks. It isn't necessarily the need to match 'dick' to 'robert' but to search for: 'name surname' name, surname' 'surname name' 'surname, name' And nothing else, I don't need to worry about nick names or abbreviations of a name, just the above variations. I think I might use text_ws. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Uwe Reh r...@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de wrote: Hi Michael, in our index ob bibliographic metadata, we see the need for at least tree fields: - name_facet: String as type, because the facet should should represent the original inverted format from our data. - name: TextField for searching. This field is heavily analyzed to match different orders, to match synonyms, phonetic similarity, German umlauts and other European stuff. - name_lc: TextField. This field is just mapped to lower case. It's used to boost docs with the same style of writing like the users input. Uwe Am 08.01.2013 15:30, schrieb Michael Jones: Hi, What would be the best fieldtype for a persons name? at the moment I'm using text_general but, if I search for bob smith, some results I get back might be rob thomas. In that it's matched 'ob'. But I only really want results that are either 'bob smith' 'bob, smith' 'smith, bob' 'smith bob' Thanks
Re: fieldtype for name
Also. I'm allowing users to do enter a name with quotes to search for an exact name. So at the moment only smith, robert will return any results where *robert smith* will return all variations including 'smith, herbert' On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Michael Jones michaelj...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks. It isn't necessarily the need to match 'dick' to 'robert' but to search for: 'name surname' name, surname' 'surname name' 'surname, name' And nothing else, I don't need to worry about nick names or abbreviations of a name, just the above variations. I think I might use text_ws. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Uwe Reh r...@hebis.uni-frankfurt.dewrote: Hi Michael, in our index ob bibliographic metadata, we see the need for at least tree fields: - name_facet: String as type, because the facet should should represent the original inverted format from our data. - name: TextField for searching. This field is heavily analyzed to match different orders, to match synonyms, phonetic similarity, German umlauts and other European stuff. - name_lc: TextField. This field is just mapped to lower case. It's used to boost docs with the same style of writing like the users input. Uwe Am 08.01.2013 15:30, schrieb Michael Jones: Hi, What would be the best fieldtype for a persons name? at the moment I'm using text_general but, if I search for bob smith, some results I get back might be rob thomas. In that it's matched 'ob'. But I only really want results that are either 'bob smith' 'bob, smith' 'smith, bob' 'smith bob' Thanks
Re: fieldtype for name
Hi, My schema file is here http://pastebin.com/ArY7xVUJ Query (name:'ian paisley') returns ~ 3000 results Query (name:'paisley, ian') returns ~ 250 results - That is how the name is stored, so is returning just the results with that person. I need all variations to return 250 results Query (name:*ian paisley*) returns ~ 8000 results - but acceptable as I know it has a wild card. Thanks On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Without seeing the configs I would guess default query operator might be OR (and check docs for mm parameter on the Wiki) or there are ngrams involved. Former is more likely. Otis Solr ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Jan 9, 2013 6:16 AM, Michael Jones michaelj...@gmail.com wrote: Also. I'm allowing users to do enter a name with quotes to search for an exact name. So at the moment only smith, robert will return any results where *robert smith* will return all variations including 'smith, herbert' On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Michael Jones michaelj...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. It isn't necessarily the need to match 'dick' to 'robert' but to search for: 'name surname' name, surname' 'surname name' 'surname, name' And nothing else, I don't need to worry about nick names or abbreviations of a name, just the above variations. I think I might use text_ws. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Uwe Reh r...@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de wrote: Hi Michael, in our index ob bibliographic metadata, we see the need for at least tree fields: - name_facet: String as type, because the facet should should represent the original inverted format from our data. - name: TextField for searching. This field is heavily analyzed to match different orders, to match synonyms, phonetic similarity, German umlauts and other European stuff. - name_lc: TextField. This field is just mapped to lower case. It's used to boost docs with the same style of writing like the users input. Uwe Am 08.01.2013 15:30, schrieb Michael Jones: Hi, What would be the best fieldtype for a persons name? at the moment I'm using text_general but, if I search for bob smith, some results I get back might be rob thomas. In that it's matched 'ob'. But I only really want results that are either 'bob smith' 'bob, smith' 'smith, bob' 'smith bob' Thanks
Re: fieldtype for name
Brilliant! Thank you! On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: q=name:(ian paisley)q.op=AND
fieldtype for name
Hi, What would be the best fieldtype for a persons name? at the moment I'm using text_general but, if I search for bob smith, some results I get back might be rob thomas. In that it's matched 'ob'. But I only really want results that are either 'bob smith' 'bob, smith' 'smith, bob' 'smith bob' Thanks
Re: multiple attribute
Hi, Sorry if anyone found my question confusing. I have an XML document that is nested file foo bar/ thunk/ /foo /file And I know that with solr that you have to flatten your data, so I was just trying to workout the best way to do a search on nested document. I was looking to see if instead of having multiple nodes, I would have those nodes as attributes on one single node and still be able to search. So if my node looked like field name=person date=2000-01-01 location=earth username=bob job=test index=true / I would be able to search: date 2002 location = earth job = test But I'm not sure if that is the best way to do it? I know I would have to specify a type for each attribute in the config. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote: Michael, Your question is a little bit confusing. Business entities have attributes. We model entities as documents, and attributes as fields. That's why adding attributes to a filed is contradictory. Btw there few nearby conceptions in Lucene, which are Payloads and TermsPositions. About the problem itself I can suggest: - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing - it supports faceting - block join http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/01/searching-relational-content-with.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076 - patch only but really performant - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SurroundQueryParser available in 4.0 can be used by the way proposed here http://goo.gl/R2bxc video http://vimeo.com/album/2012142/video/33817062 Have a good dive! On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Michael Jones michaelj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know that solr doesn't provide support for nested documents, but can I add multiple attributes to a field? add document field name=test foo=one bar =two index=true And specify an index on those attributes? I have a nested document that needs to be saved and searched. If the above can not be achieved what would be a suitable alternative? Would I have to do something like: add document field name=test foo=one bar =two field name=foo index=trueone/field field name=bar index=truetwo/field And just return name=test ? Thanks -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics http://www.griddynamics.com mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
