Re: Solr Cores
How much query per second a single core can handle in this case.. regards On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Erick. Regards Sujatha On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: You can have a large number of cores, so people have multiple hundreds. Having multiple cores is preferred over having multiple JVMs since it's more efficient at sharing system resources. If you're running a 32 bit JVM, you are limited in the amount of memory you can let the JVM use, so that's a consideration, but otherwise use multiple cores in one JVM and give that JVM say, half of the physical memory on the machine and tune from there. Best Erick On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with each additional instance added. I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores , instead of individual instances. - Is there any limit to the number of cores ,for a single instance? - Will this decrease the permgen space as the LIB is shared.? - Would there be any decrease in performance with number of cores added? - Any thing else that I should know before moving into cores? Any help would be appreciated? Regards Sujatha
Re: CLOSE_WAIT after connecting to multiple shards from a primary shard
Hi Mukund, Since I am getting this issue for long time, I had done some hit and run. In my case I am connecting the local tomcat server using solrJ. SolrJ has max connection perhost 20 and per client 2. As I have heavy load and lots of dependency on solr so it seems very low. To increase the default perhost and per client connetions I done: MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager connectionManager=new MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager(); DefaultHttpMethodRetryHandler retryhandler = new DefaultHttpMethodRetryHandler(0, false); connectionManager.getParams().setMaxTotalConnections(500); connectionManager.getParams().setDefaultMaxConnectionsPerHost(500); connectionManager.closeIdleConnections(0L); connectionManager.getParams().setMaxTotalConnections(500); connectionManager.getParams().setDefaultMaxConnectionsPerHost(500); connectionManager.closeIdleConnections(0L); HttpClient httpClient=new HttpClient(connectionManager); httpClient.getHttpConnectionManager().getParams().setDefaultMaxConnectionsPerHost(500); httpClient.getHttpConnectionManager().getParams().setMaxTotalConnections(500); httpClient.getParams().setParameter(http.method.retry-handler, retryhandler); server=new CommonsHttpSolrServer(getSolrURL(), httpClient); I have 5 cores setup and I am using above code for each core in static block and using same instance across all the class. but it not seems any effect. still server die randomly in 1 to 2 days. I am using Tomcat instead of jetty. I already increase maxThread in tomcat to 500 Is there any limitation of tomcat for this much stress. But other end when I look using telnet there is not much thread is open. I have doubt in httpclient. any help.. regards On Tuesday 24 January 2012 07:27 AM, Mukunda Madhava wrote: Hi Ranveer, I dont have any solution to this problem. I havent got any response from the forums as well. I implemented custom design for distributed searching, as it gave me better control on the connections open. On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.com mailto:ranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mukunda, Did you get solution. Actually I am aslo getting same problem. Please help me to over come this problem. regards Ranveer On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Mukunda Madhava mukunda...@gmail.com mailto:mukunda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Otis, Sending to solr-user mailing list. We see this CLOSE_WAIT connections even when i do a simple http request via curl, that is, even when i do a simple curl using a primary and secondary shard query, like for e.g. curl http://primaryshardhost:8180/solr/core0/select?q=*%3A*shards=secondaryshardhost1:8090/solr/appgroup1_11053000_11053100 http://primaryshardhost:8180/solr/core0/select?q=*%3A*shards=secondaryshardhost1:8090/solr/appgroup1_11053000_11053100 While fetching data it is in ESTABLISHED state -sh-3.2$ netstat | grep ESTABLISHED | grep 8090 tcp0 0 primaryshardhost:36805 secondaryshardhost1:8090 ESTABLISHED After the request has come back, it is in CLOSE_WAIT state -sh-3.2$ netstat | grep CLOSE_WAIT | grep 8090 tcp1 0 primaryshardhost:36805 secondaryshardhost1:8090 CLOSE_WAIT why does Solr keep the connection to the shards in CLOSE_WAIT? Is this a feature of Solr? If we modify an OS property (I dont know how) to cleanup the CLOSE_WAITs will it cause an issue with subsequent searches? Can someone help me please? thanks, Mukunda On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, A few things: 1) why not send this to the Solr list? 2) you talk about searching, but the code sample is about optimizing the index. 3) I don't have SolrJ API in front of me, but isn't there is CommonsSolrServe ctor that takes in a URL instead of HttpClient instance? Try that one. Otis - Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Mukunda Madhava mukunda...@gmail.com mailto:mukunda...@gmail.com To: gene...@lucene.apache.org mailto:gene...@lucene.apache.org Sent: Mon, May 30, 2011 1:54:07 PM Subject: CLOSE_WAIT after connecting to multiple shards from a primary shard Hi, We are having
Re: Too many connections in CLOSE_WAIT state on master solr server
Hi, I am facing same problem. Did -Dhttp.maxConnections resolve the problem ? Please let us know! regards Ranveer On Thursday 15 December 2011 11:30 AM, samarth s wrote: Thanks Erick and Mikhail. I'll try this out. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Erick Ericksonerickerick...@gmail.com wrote: I'm guessing (and it's just a guess) that what's happening is that the container is queueing up your requests while waiting for the other connections to close, so Mikhail's suggestion seems like a good idea. Best Erick On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:28 AM, samarth s samarth.s.seksa...@gmail.com wrote: The updates to the master are user driven, and are needed to be visible quickly. Hence, the high frequency of replication. It may be that too many replication requests are being handled at a time, but why should that result in half closed connections? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Erick Ericksonerickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Replicating 40 cores every 20 seconds is just *asking* for trouble. How often do your cores change on the master? How big are they? Is there any chance you just have too many cores replicating at once? Best Erick On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote: You can try to reuse your connections (prevent them from closing) by specifying -Dhttp.maxConnections=http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.htmlN in jvm startup params. At client JVM!. Number should be chosen considering the number of connection you'd like to keep alive. Let me know if it works for you. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:57 PM, samarth ssamarth.s.seksa...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I am using solr replication and am experiencing a lot of connections in the state CLOSE_WAIT at the master solr server. These disappear after a while, but till then the master solr stops responding. There are about 130 open connections on the master server with the client as the slave m/c and all are in the state CLOSE_WAIT. Also, the client port specified on the master solr server netstat results is not visible in the netstat results on the client (slave solr) m/c. Following is my environment: - 40 cores in the master solr on m/c 1 - 40 cores in the slave solr on m/c 2 - The replication poll interval is 20 seconds. - Replication part in solrconfig.xml in the slave solr: requestHandler name=/replication class=solr.ReplicationHandler lst name=slave !--fully qualified url for the replication handler of master-- str name=masterUrl$mastercorename/replication/str !--Interval in which the slave should poll master .Format is HH:mm:ss . If this is absent slave does not poll automatically. But a fetchindex can be triggered from the admin or the http API-- str name=pollInterval00:00:20/str !-- The following values are used when the slave connects to the master to download the index files. Default values implicitly set as 5000ms and 1ms respectively. The user DOES NOT need to specify these unless the bandwidth is extremely low or if there is an extremely high latency-- str name=httpConnTimeout5000/str str name=httpReadTimeout1/str /lst /requestHandler Thanks for any pointers. -- Regards, Samarth -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Developer Grid Dynamics tel. 1-415-738-8644 Skype: mkhludnev http://www.griddynamics.com mkhlud...@griddynamics.com -- Regards, Samarth
Re: field value getting null with special char
Hi Erick,
I am using SolrQuery.setFields and following are my code :
query.setParam(fq, type:Livescore);
query.addSortField(last_updated, ORDER.desc);
query.setRows(5);
I think solr is connecting to server because with same query I am
getting field value other than special char field value.
regards
Ranveer
On Sunday 25 September 2011 12:11 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
I can't imagine that the ( or ) is a problem. So I think we need to see
how you're using SolrJ. In particular, are you asking for the
field in question to be returned (e.g. SolrQuery.setFields or addField)?
Second question: Are you sure your SolrJ is connecting to the server you
connect to with the browser? You should see activity in the logs for both
cases.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Ranveer Kumarranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Is any help.. I am unable to figure out..
On 20-Sep-2011 2:22 PM, Ranveerranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing problem to get value from solr server for a particular field.
My environment is :
Red hat 5.3
Solr 3.3
Jdk 1.6.24
Tomcat 6.2x
Fetching value using SolrJ
When using *:* on browser it show but when using solrj all value coming
except few fields those have special char.
str name=fetch_value1Scoring (TEST)/str
str name=fetch_value2Scoring rate 3/4 (5)/str
above value coming on browser but getting blank in solrj. I also noticed
that all field with '(' or ')' have this kind of problem.
If this is related to '(' then how to skip special char so can get value
in solrj.
regards
Ranveer
field value getting null with special char
Hi All,
I am facing problem to get value from solr server for a particular field.
My environment is :
Red hat 5.3
Solr 3.3
Jdk 1.6.24
Tomcat 6.2x
Fetching value using SolrJ
When using *:* on browser it show but when using solrj all value coming
except few fields those have special char.
str name=fetch_value1Scoring (TEST)/str
str name=fetch_value2Scoring rate 3/4 (5)/str
above value coming on browser but getting blank in solrj. I also noticed
that all field with '(' or ')' have this kind of problem.
If this is related to '(' then how to skip special char so can get value
in solrj.
regards
Ranveer
Re: field value getting null with special char
Is any help.. I am unable to figure out..
On 20-Sep-2011 2:22 PM, Ranveer ranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing problem to get value from solr server for a particular field.
My environment is :
Red hat 5.3
Solr 3.3
Jdk 1.6.24
Tomcat 6.2x
Fetching value using SolrJ
When using *:* on browser it show but when using solrj all value coming
except few fields those have special char.
str name=fetch_value1Scoring (TEST)/str
str name=fetch_value2Scoring rate 3/4 (5)/str
above value coming on browser but getting blank in solrj. I also noticed
that all field with '(' or ')' have this kind of problem.
If this is related to '(' then how to skip special char so can get value
in solrj.
regards
Ranveer
Re: category tree navigation with the help of solr
Hi Priti, You can do this by adding an extra field (string type) for facet on which you need to send query. 1.One product can belong to more than one categories. You can put internal flag for that category at index time, and at the time of query you can send that flag to query. More of less same thing I am doing in www.jagranjosh.com and videos.jagran.com regards Ranveer On Monday 05 Septyember 2011 01:09 PM, Tony Qiu wrote: Dear Gupta, In my case, I am doing something similar to you. I use tow core, one core I build category's tree, another core I use to build the product's information include the leaf cat of products. So when one search I get, I will facet the leaf cat, then get the category tree in the category core via product's leafcat (or you can cache the category tree in you memery). Hope this can help u. 2011/9/5 Priti Guptapgupt...@sapient.com Hi, We are using solr in our ecommerce application.we are indexing on different attributes of products. We want to create category tree with the help of solr. There are following points about catgory and products to be considered, 1.One product can belong to more than one categories. 2.category is a hierarchical facet. 3.More than one categories can share same name. It would be a great help if someone can suggest a way to index and query data based on the above architecture. Thanks, Priti
not equals query in solr
Hi All, How to do negative query in solr. Following are the criteria : I have state and city field where I want to filter only those state and city which is not blank. something like: state NOT AND city NOT . I tried -state: but its not working. Or suggest me to do this in better way.. regards Ranveer
Re: not equals query in solr
Hi, is it right way to do : q=(state:[* TO *] AND city:[* TO *]) regards Ranveer On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, How to do negative query in solr. Following are the criteria : I have state and city field where I want to filter only those state and city which is not blank. something like: state NOT AND city NOT . I tried -state: but its not working. Or suggest me to do this in better way.. regards Ranveer
Re: not equals query in solr
any help... On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, is it right way to do : q=(state:[* TO *] AND city:[* TO *]) regards Ranveer On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, How to do negative query in solr. Following are the criteria : I have state and city field where I want to filter only those state and city which is not blank. something like: state NOT AND city NOT . I tried -state: but its not working. Or suggest me to do this in better way.. regards Ranveer
how to get row no. of current record
Hi, How to know the row number of current record. i.e : suppose we have 10 million record indexed. Currently I am on 5th records and id of the this record is XYZ00234, how to know that the current record rows no is 5th. thanks.. regards Ranveer
Re: how to get row no. of current record
any help.. On Tuesday 02 August 2011 11:22 PM, Ranveer wrote: Hi, How to know the row number of current record. i.e : suppose we have 10 million record indexed. Currently I am on 5th records and id of the this record is XYZ00234, how to know that the current record rows no is 5th. thanks..
Re: how to get row no. of current record
Hi Anshum, Thanks for reply. My requirement is to get result start from current id. For this I need to set start rows. I am looking something like Jonty's post : http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/previous-and-next-rows-of-current-record-td3187935.html thanks Ranveer On Wednesday 03 August 2011 08:31 AM, Anshum wrote: Hi Ranveer, I'm not really sure if you mean lucene's docid (as that's the auto increment id used in here). Why would you need that in the first place? I'd suggest you not to expose that. Let me know in case you wanted something else. Also, perhaps you could explain the exact usecase and one of us give you a better solution. Hope that helps. -- Anshum Gupta http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Ranveer ranveer.s...@gmail.com mailto:ranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, How to know the row number of current record. i.e : suppose we have 10 million record indexed. Currently I am on 5th records and id of the this record is XYZ00234, how to know that the current record rows no is 5th. thanks.. regards Ranveer
Re: Announcement/Invitation: Melbourne Solr/Lucene Users Group
Hi, I m intrested to atained but not in aus.:-( Regards On 21-Jul-2011 9:45 AM, Dave Hall dave.h...@skwashd.com wrote: Hi Tal, On 21/07/11 14:04, Tal Rotbart wrote: We have noticed that there is a blossoming of Apache Solr/Lucene usage development in Melbourne in addition to a lack of an unofficial, relaxed gathering to allow some fruitful information and experience exchange. We're trying to put together a laid back meet up for developers (and other interested people) who are currently using Apache Solr (and/or Lucene) or would like to learn more about it. Aiming for it to be a high signal/noise ratio group, with meet ups probably once every two months. This sounds great! I'm not sure I'll be a regular, but if I'm around town when it is on I will try to drop in. The first meet up is still TBD, but please join the group if you're keen to join us for pizza, beer, and a discussion about Solr once we figure out the date of the first meeting. Once a date is decided please update the Melbourne *UG wiki page so others can find out about it. The wiki has meeting times for various user groups around town, which might help you find a time which doesn't clash with other groups. Check out at http://perl.net.au/wiki/Melbourne Cheers Dave
Re: commit time and lock
Dear all, Kindly help me.. thanks On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:46 AM, Jonty Rhods wrote: I am using solrj to index the data. I have around 5 docs indexed. As at the time of commit due to lock server stop giving response so I was calculating commit time: double starttemp = System.currentTimeMillis(); server.add(docs); server.commit(); System.out.println(total time in commit = + (System.currentTimeMillis() - starttemp)/1000); It taking around 9 second to commit the 5000 docs with 15 fields. However I am not confirm the lock time of index whether it is start since server.add(docs); time or server.commit(); time only. If I am changing from above to following server.add(docs); double starttemp = System.currentTimeMillis(); server.commit(); System.out.println(total time in commit = + (System.currentTimeMillis() - starttemp)/1000); then commit time becomes less then 1 second. I am not sure which one is right. please help. regards Jonty
Re: query about the server configuration
thanks.. However I am still not clear about that How can I achieve the requirement: 1. I have around 1 file to index daily. 2. I need to index in every 5 minutes 3. size of the files are 50mb per day 4. 10 to 20 concurrent users please help.. regards On Monday 20 June 2011 06:07 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: From Ahmet Arslan's email to Ranveer: It uses HttpClient under the hood. You can pass httpClient to its constructor too. It seems that MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager has setMaxConnectionsPerHost method. String serverPath = http://localhost:8983/solr;; HttpClient client = new HttpClient(new MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager()); URL url = new URL(serverPath); CommonsHttpSolrServer solrServer = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url, client); Best Erick On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Jonty Rhodsjonty.rh...@gmail.com wrote: I forgot an important point that I need to commit the server in 2 to 5 minutes.. please help.. regards On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Ranveerranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote: Please help I am also in same situation. regards On Sunday 19 June 2011 12:59 PM, Jonty Rhods wrote: Dear all, I am quite new and not work on solr for heavy request. I have following server configuration: 16GB RAM 16 CPU I need to index update in every minutes and at least more than 5000 docs per day. Size of the data per day will be around 50 MB. I am expecting 10 to 30 concurrent hit on server which is 2 million hits per day and around 30 to 40 concurrent user at peak our. Right now I had configure core and using static method to call solr server in solrj (SolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer();). I am worried that at peak our static instance of the server in solrj will not able to perform the response and it will become slow. Is there any way to open more then one connection of server instance in the SolrJ like connection pool which we are using in Database related connection pooling (Apache DBCP or Hibernate). Please help me to configure the server as my heavy requirements. thanks for your help. regards jonty
Re: query about the server configuration
Please help I am also in same situation. regards On Sunday 19 June 2011 12:59 PM, Jonty Rhods wrote: Dear all, I am quite new and not work on solr for heavy request. I have following server configuration: 16GB RAM 16 CPU I need to index update in every minutes and at least more than 5000 docs per day. Size of the data per day will be around 50 MB. I am expecting 10 to 30 concurrent hit on server which is 2 million hits per day and around 30 to 40 concurrent user at peak our. Right now I had configure core and using static method to call solr server in solrj (SolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer();). I am worried that at peak our static instance of the server in solrj will not able to perform the response and it will become slow. Is there any way to open more then one connection of server instance in the SolrJ like connection pool which we are using in Database related connection pooling (Apache DBCP or Hibernate). Please help me to configure the server as my heavy requirements. thanks for your help. regards jonty
Re: about the SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(URL);
thanks.. however few more query. How to maintain connections threads (max and min settings)? What would be ideal setting for max in setMaxConnectionsPerHost method. Will it be ok for 30 to 40 concurrent user. How thread will be maintain for MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager class. On Sunday 19 June 2011 02:04 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: for heavy use (30 to 40 concurrent user) will it work. How to open and maintain more connection at a time like connection pool. So user cat receive fast response.. It uses HttpClient under the hood. You can pass httpClient to its constructor too. It seems that MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager has setMaxConnectionsPerHost method. String serverPath = http://localhost:8983/solr;; HttpClient client = new HttpClient(new MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager()); URL url = new URL(serverPath); CommonsHttpSolrServer solrServer = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url, client);
about the SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(URL);
Dear all, I am using SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(URL); through out the class. How can I improve the connection, in my case: should I need to close the server after fetching the result or CommonsHttpSolrServer(URL); will maintain at their end. There is other way: I can make this as static and can use through out the classes. please suggest.. regards
Re: scheduling imports and heartbeats
You should use cron for that.. On 10 Nov 2010 08:47, Tri Nguyen tringuye...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Can I configure solr to schedule imports at a specified time (say once a day, once an hour, etc)? Also, does solr have some sort of heartbeat mechanism? Thanks, Tri
Re: SolrJ Response + JSON
Rajani is right you can get response by passing wt=json. But I think if you want to use solrj then you will require to parse binary format data in json format or you can use third party json parser. regards Ranveer http://www.onlymyhealth.com On Thursday 29 July 2010 09:55 AM, rajini maski wrote: Yeah right... This query will do it http://localhost:8090/solr/select/?q=*:*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onwt=json This will do your work... This is more liike using xsl transformation supported by solr..:) Regards, Rajani Maski On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Mark Allanmark.al...@ed.ac.uk wrote: I think you should just be able to addwt=json to the end of your query (or change whatever the existing wt parameter is in your URL). Mark On 28 Jul 2010, at 12:54 pm, MitchK wrote: Hello community, I need to transform SolrJ - responses into JSON, after some computing on those results by another application has finished. I can not do those computations on the Solr - side. So, I really have to translate SolrJ's output into JSON. Any experiences how to do so without writing your own JSON-writer? Thank you. - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-Response-JSON-tp1002024p1002024.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Re: display solr result in JSP
Hi, very simple to display value in jsp. if you are using solrj then simply store value in bean from java class and can display. same thing you can do in servlet too.. get the solr server response and return in bean or can display directly(in servlet). hope you will able to do. regards Ranveer On Wednesday 28 July 2010 08:11 PM, Ma, Xiaohui (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C] wrote: I am new for solr. Just got example xml file index and search by following solr tutorial. I wonder how I can get the search result display in a JSP. I really appreciate any suggestions you can give. Thanks so much, Xiaohui
Re: simple question from a newbie
I think you using wild-card search or should use wild-card search. but first of all please provide the schema and configuration file for more details. regards Ranveer On Wednesday 28 July 2010 07:51 PM, Nguyen, Vincent (CDC/OSELS/NCPHI) (CTR) wrote: Hi, I'm new to Solr and have a rather dumb question. I want to do a query that returns all the Titles that start with a certain letter. For example I have these titles: Results of in-mine research in support Cancer Reports State injury indicators report Cancer Reports Indexed dermal bibliography Childhood agricultural-related injury report Childhood agricultural injury prevention I want the query to return: Cancer Reports Cancer Reports Childhood agricultural-related injury report Childhood agricultural injury prevention I want something like dc.title=c* type query I know that I can facet by dc.title and then use the parameter facet.prefix=c but it returns something like this: Cancer Reports [2] Childhood agricultural-related injury report [1] Childhood agricultural injury prevention [1] Vincent Vu Nguyen Division of Science Quality and Translation Office of the Associate Director for Science Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 404-498-6154 Century Bldg 2400 Atlanta, GA 30329
Re: logic for auto-index
Hi Peter, actually I want the index process should start automatically. right now I am doing mannually. same thing I want to start indexing when less load on server i.e. late night. So setting auto will fix my problem.. On Wednesday 02 June 2010 02:00 PM, Peter Karich wrote: Hi Jonty, what is your specific problem? You could use a cronjob or the Java-lib called quartz to automate this task. Or did you mean replication? Regards, Peter. Hi All, I am very new to solr as well as java too. I require to use solrj for indexing also require to index automatically once in 24 hour. I wrote java code for indexing now I want to do further coding for automatic process. Could you suggest or give me sample code for automatic index process.. please help.. with regards Jonty.
max no of column in schema
Hi, How many column can we defined in schema. I have already around 100 column in schema.. thanks
Re: require synonym filter on string field
On 4/29/10 3:45 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: Ranveer Kumar wrote: Hi, I require to configure synonym to exact match. The field I need to search is string type. I tried to configure by the text but in text, due to whitespace tokenizer exact match not found. My requirement is : suppose user search by solr user and exact solr user (or equivalant synonym) are available then only return result.. my fieldType is string and I want to configure synonym on string field. or Is there any other way to index without tokenize (as it is) string and configure synonym for that field? please help.. Why don't you use KeywordTokenizer? And if you want to treat text in synonyms.txt as string as well, set tokenizerFactory attribute to KeywordTokenizerFactory. Koji Hi Koji, thanks for reply. where should I use the KeywordTokenizerFactory in string or in text field. I am wondering that KeywordTokenizerFactory will work or not in textfield. Actually as I understood about the KeywordTokenizerFactory that : KeywordTokenizerFactory is tokenize the keyword. for example : 'solr user' will tokenize to 'solr' and 'user' because solr and user are keyword.. My requirement is to index as 'solr user'
synonym filter problem for string or phrase
Hi, I am trying to configure synonym filter. my requirement is: when user searching by phrase like what is solr user? then it should be replace with solr user. something like : what is solr user? = solr user My schema for particular field is: fieldType name=text_sync class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.TrimFilterFactory / filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true tokenizerFactory=KeywordTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType it seems working fine while trying by analysis.jsp but not by url http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select?q=what is solr user? or http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select?q=what is solr user? Please guide me for achieve desire result.
Re: synonym filter problem for string or phrase
On 4/29/10 8:50 PM, Marco Martinez wrote: Hi Ranveer, If you don't specify a field type in the q parameter, the search will be done searching in your default search field defined in the solrconfig.xml, its your default field a text_sync field? Regards, Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/4/29 Ranveerranveer.s...@gmail.com Hi, I am trying to configure synonym filter. my requirement is: when user searching by phrase like what is solr user? then it should be replace with solr user. something like : what is solr user? = solr user My schema for particular field is: fieldType name=text_sync class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.TrimFilterFactory / filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true tokenizerFactory=KeywordTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType it seems working fine while trying by analysis.jsp but not by url http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select?q=what is solr user? or http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select?q=what is solr user? Please guide me for achieve desire result. Hi Marco, thanks. yes my default search field is text_sync. I am getting result now but not as I expect. following is my synonym.txt what is bone cancer=bone cancer what is bone cancer?=bone cancer what is of bone cancer=bone cancer what is symptom of bone cancer=bone cancer what is symptoms of bone cancer=bone cancer in above I am getting result of all synonym but not the last one what is symptoms of bone cancer=bone cancer. I think due to stemming I am not getting expected result. However when I am checking result from the analysis.jsp, its giving expected result. I am confused.. Also I want to know best approach to configure synonym for my requirement. thanks with regards
Re: Facet count problem
I am.using text for type, which is static. For example: type is a field and I am using type for categorization. For news type I am using news and for blog using blog.. type is a text field. On Apr 17, 2010 8:38 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: I am facing problem to get facet result count. I must be wrong somewhere. I am getting proper ... Are you faceting on a tokenized field? What is the fieldType of your field?
Re: Facet count problem
Hi Erick, My schema configuration is following. fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ !--tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/-- !-- in this example, we will only use synonyms at query time filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=index_synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=false/ -- !-- Case insensitive stop word removal. add enablePositionIncrements=true in both the index and query analyzers to leave a 'gap' for more accurate phrase queries. -- filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory language=English protected=protwords.txt/ /analyzer analyzer type=query charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/!-- escapedTags=lt;,gt;/ -- tokenizer class=solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ !--tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/-- !--tokenizer class=solr.HTMLStripStandardTokenizerFactory/-- !-- filter class=solr.LengthFilterFactory min=2 max=50 / -- filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory language=English protected=protwords.txt/ /analyzer /fieldType field name=type type=text indexed=true stored=true/ !-- copy field for default search-- copyField source=type dest=text/ On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote: Can we see the actual field definitions from your schema file. Ahmet's question is vital and is best answered if you'll copy/paste the relevant configuration entries But based on what you *have* posted, I'd guess you're trying to facet on tokenized fields, which is not recommended. You might take a look at: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists, it'll help you frame your questions in a manner that gets you your answers as fast as possibld. Best Erick On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote: I am.using text for type, which is static. For example: type is a field and I am using type for categorization. For news type I am using news and for blog using blog.. type is a text field. On Apr 17, 2010 8:38 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: I am facing problem to get facet result count. I must be wrong somewhere. I am getting proper ... Are you faceting on a tokenized field? What is the fieldType of your field?
Re: HTMLStripCharFilterFactory configuration problem
Hi Sven, Thanks for reply.. but how will I get the stored value instead of indexed value.. where I need to configure to get stored instead of indexed value. please help... thanks with regards On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Sven Maurmann sven.maurm...@kippdata.dewrote: Hi, please note that you get the stored value of the field as a result and not the indexed one. Cheers, Sven --On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 02:54:52 PM +0530 Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am facing problem to configure HTMLStripCharFilterFactory. following is the schema : fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory language=English protected=protwords.txt/ /analyzer analyzer type=query charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/!-- escapedTags=lt;,gt;/ -- tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ !-- filter class=solr.LengthFilterFactory min=2 max=50 / -- filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory language=English protected=protwords.txt/ /analyzer /fieldType when I am checking with analysis.jsp it giving true result. But in my query result still I am getting html tage.. I am using solrj client.. please help me -- kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH Sven Maurmann Tel: 0228 98549 -12 Bornheimer Str. 33a Fax: 0228 98549 -50 D-53111 Bonnsven.maurm...@kippdata.de HRB 8018 Amtsgericht Bonn / USt.-IdNr. DE 196 457 417 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Thomas Höfer, Rainer Jung, Sven Maurmann
Facet count problem
Hi,
I am facing problem to get facet result count. I must be wrong somewhere.
I am getting proper result count when searching by single word, but when
searching by string then result count become wrong.
for example : -
search keyword : Bagdad bomb blast.
I am getting 5 result count for facet country. but when clicking on the
facet browser actual value is more then 5.
When searching by bagdad then result count is fine.
when using url to check the response for string
http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select?q=bagdad bomb
blastfacet=onfacet.field=typefq=type:news
it giving the result count 8 which is right.
I am using solrj client. following is my code:-
query.setFacet(true);
// query.addFacetQuery(type:+)
query.addFacetField(type);
query.addFacetQuery(qq);
query.setFacetSort(index);
ListFacetField listFacet = rsp.getFacetFields();
IteratorFacetField itr = listFacet.iterator();
log.info(listFacet.size());
for (int i = 0; i listFacet.size(); i++) {
FacetField facetField = itr.next();
ListFacetField.Count fList = facetField.getValues();
if (fList == null) {
break;
}
log.info(fList.size());
IteratorFacetField.Count flistItr = fList.iterator();
for (int j = 0; j fList.size(); j++) {
FacetField.Count ff = flistItr.next();
labelValueBean = new LabelValueBean();
labelValueBean.setLabel(ff.getName());
labelValueBean.setValue(Long.toString(ff.getCount()));
log.info(ff.getName() + : + ff.getCount());
listLabelValueBean.add(labelValueBean);
}
}
please help..
thanks
with regards
Re: HTMLStripCharFilterFactory configuration problem
thanks.. Actually I am using SolrJ client.. Is there anyway to do same using solrj. thanks On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks for reply.. but how will I get the stored value instead of indexed value.. where I need to configure to get stored instead of indexed value. please help... You need to remove html tags before analysis (charfilter, tokenizer, tokenfilter) phase. For example if you are using DIH to index, you can use HTMLStripTransformer[1]. How are you indexing your data? [1]http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#HTMLStripTransformer
HTMLStripCharFilterFactory configuration problem
Hi all, I am facing problem to configure HTMLStripCharFilterFactory. following is the schema : fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory language=English protected=protwords.txt/ /analyzer analyzer type=query charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/!-- escapedTags=lt;,gt;/ -- tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ !-- filter class=solr.LengthFilterFactory min=2 max=50 / -- filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory language=English protected=protwords.txt/ /analyzer /fieldType when I am checking with analysis.jsp it giving true result. But in my query result still I am getting html tage.. I am using solrj client.. please help me
how to patch solr
Hi All, I have no idea about How to run patch? I am using windows os and I need to patch https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12407047/SOLR-1139.patch Currently I download solr 1.4 and using. Should I need to download source code and compiled. or can patch jar (compiled) file directly.. please guide from basics.. thanks
Re: Facet search concept problem
Hi Eric, Raju Thanks for reply.. It means I need to index separate table data (news, article and blog), currently I am joining the table and making a single rows for all three table. One other thing I want to know that, in this case (if i indexing table data separately then) some column of the table is not common. so it will go blank while indexing for other table. for example: news and article have some other column like, city which is not common and not in the other table, if I am indexing other table then this column will go blank. is this ok to leaving blank field? also in this case no. of column will increase so is there any limitation in solr regarding no. of column? thanks On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM, NarasimhaRaju rajux...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, you should have a new field in your index say 'type' which will have values 'news','article' and 'blog' for documents news,article and blog respectively. when searching with facet's elabled make use of this 'type' field then you will get what you wanted. Regards, P.N.Raju, From: Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sun, February 14, 2010 5:45:54 AM Subject: Facet search concept problem Hi All, My concept still not clear about facet search. I am trying to search using facet query. I am indexing data from three table, following is the detail of table: table name: news news_id news_details table name : article article_id article_details table name: blog blog_id blog_details I am indexing above tables as: id news_id news_details article_id article_details blog_id blog_details Now I want, when user search by soccer game and search match in all field news(5), article(4) and blog(2), then it should be list like: news(5) article(4) blog(2) currently facet listing like: soccer(5) game(6) please help me.. thanks
Facet search concept problem
Hi All, My concept still not clear about facet search. I am trying to search using facet query. I am indexing data from three table, following is the detail of table: table name: news news_id news_details table name : article article_id article_details table name: blog blog_id blog_details I am indexing above tables as: id news_id news_details article_id article_details blog_id blog_details Now I want, when user search by soccer game and search match in all field news(5), article(4) and blog(2), then it should be list like: news(5) article(4) blog(2) currently facet listing like: soccer(5) game(6) please help me.. thanks
joining two field for query
Hi all, I need logic in solr to join two field in query; I indexed two field : id and body(text type). 5 rows are indexed: id=1 : text= nokia samsung id=2 : text= sony vaio nokia samsung id=3 : text= vaio nokia etc.. I am searching by q=id:1 returning result perfectly, returning nokia samsung. I am searching by nokia and resulting (listing) 1,2,3 field with short description. There is link on search list(like google), by clicking on link performing new search (opening doc from index), for this search I want to join two fields: id:1 + queryString (nokia samsung) to return only id:1 record and want to highlight the field nokia samsung. something like : q=id:1 + body:nokia samsung basically I want to highlight the query string when clicking on link and opening the new windows (like google cache). please help.. thanks
Re: joining two field for query (Solved)
Hi Ahmet, Thank you very much.. my problem solved.. with regards On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: I am searching by nokia and resulting (listing) 1,2,3 field with short description. There is link on search list(like google), by clicking on link performing new search (opening doc from index), for this search I want to join two fields: id:1 + queryString (nokia samsung) to return only id:1 record and want to highlight the field nokia samsung. something like : q=id:1 + body:nokia samsung basically I want to highlight the query string when clicking on link and opening the new windows (like google cache). When the user clicks document (id=1), you can use these parameters: q=body:(nokia samsung)fq=id:1hl=truehl.fl=body
Embedded Solr problem
Hi All, I am still very new to solr. Currently I am facing problem to use EmbeddedSolrServer. following is my code: File home = new File(D:/ranveer/java/solr_home/solr/first); CoreContainer coreContainer = new CoreContainer(); SolrConfig config = null; config = new SolrConfig(home + /core1,solrconfig.xml,null); CoreDescriptor descriptor = new CoreDescriptor(coreContainer,core1,home + /core1); SolrCore core = new SolrCore(core1, home+/core1/data, config, new IndexSchema(config, schema.xml,null), descriptor); coreContainer.register(core.getName(), core, true); final EmbeddedSolrServer server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, core1); Now my problem is every time when I making request for search SolrCore is initializing the core. I want if the core/instance of core is already start then just use previously started core. Due to this problem right now searching is taking too much time. I tried to close core after search but same thing when fresh search result is made, solr is starting from very basic. please help.. thanks
Re: Embedded Solr problem
Hi Sven, thanks for reply. yes i notice that every time when request, new instance is created of solr server. could you please guide me to do the same ( initialization to create an instance of SolrServer, once during first request). On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Sven Maurmann sven.maurm...@kippdata.dewrote: Hi, would it be possible that you instantiate a new instance of your SolrServer every time you do a query? You should use the code you quoted in your mail once during initialization to create an instance of SolrServer (the interface being implemented by EmbeddedSolrServer) and subsquently use the query method of SolrServer to do the query. Cheers, Sven --On Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010 21:54 +0530 Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am still very new to solr. Currently I am facing problem to use EmbeddedSolrServer. following is my code: File home = new File(D:/ranveer/java/solr_home/solr/first); CoreContainer coreContainer = new CoreContainer(); SolrConfig config = null; config = new SolrConfig(home + /core1,solrconfig.xml,null); CoreDescriptor descriptor = new CoreDescriptor(coreContainer,core1,home + /core1); SolrCore core = new SolrCore(core1, home+/core1/data, config, new IndexSchema(config, schema.xml,null), descriptor); coreContainer.register(core.getName(), core, true); final EmbeddedSolrServer server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, core1); Now my problem is every time when I making request for search SolrCore is initializing the core. I want if the core/instance of core is already start then just use previously started core. Due to this problem right now searching is taking too much time. I tried to close core after search but same thing when fresh search result is made, solr is starting from very basic. please help.. thanks
html tag problem while searching
Hi All, I have problem related to html tag. Basically in database some column carry html tage, for example p Hello how are you? /p I am indexing same as it is in index. I am filtering solr supported special character at query time. now the problem is when I am searching by p then result is *p Hello how are you? /p* I dont want to search in html tag content? please help? thanks
getting error when : in the query
Hi All, Facing problem when someone searching the string which carry special character : . For example: when querying by ipod:touch then throwing exception due to : . Jan 31, 2010 9:56:35 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field ipod my full query is : http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=ipod:touchhl=truestart=0rows=10hl.fragsize=0hl.fl=bodyhl.snippets=2wt=xmlversion=2.2 is there any configuration to allow : in query. please help. thanks with regards Ranveer K Kumar
Re: getting error when : in the query
Hi thanks for reply. Is it possible to filter the special character. If I will allow then need to put \ before every special character, which will consume time and create performance issue. So I want to just filter those special char from user input query. However I would also like to know that, is there any short way to put \ before special character which will not effect the performance. thanks with regards On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:09 PM, NarasimhaRaju rajux...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, you have to escape lucene special characters present in usersearch term before handing it over to QueryParser. for more info look at http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters “ There are only 10 types of people in this world:- Those who understand binary and those who don’t “ Regards, P.N.Raju, From: Ranveer Kumar ranveer.s...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 5:35:37 PM Subject: getting error when : in the query Hi All, Facing problem when someone searching the string which carry special character : . For example: when querying by ipod:touch then throwing exception due to : . Jan 31, 2010 9:56:35 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field ipod my full query is : http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=ipod:touchhl=truestart=0rows=10hl.fragsize=0hl.fl=bodyhl.snippets=2wt=xmlversion=2.2 is there any configuration to allow : in query. please help. thanks with regards Ranveer K Kumar
How to disable wildcard search
Hi all, How to remove/disable wildcard search in solr. I have no requirement of wildcard. is there any configuration to disable wildcard search in solr. I am using solrj for searching.. thanks With regards Ranveer K Kumar
Re: Hindi language support in solr
Hi Robert, Thanks for reply. As you write, I used textgen but still not able to search hindi text. Might be missing some important configuration. following is my schema.xml configuration fieldType name=textgen class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=0/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=0/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fields field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true required=true / field name=cat_name type=textgen indexed=true stored=true / field name=title type=textgen indexed=true stored=true / field name=summary type=textgen indexed=true stored=true / field name=textgen type=textgen indexed=true stored=false multiValued=true/ /fields uniqueKeyid/uniqueKey defaultSearchFieldtextgen/defaultSearchField solrQueryParser defaultOperator=OR/ copyField source=title dest=textgen/ copyField source=cat_name dest=textgen/ copyField source=summary dest=textgen/ In the summary field there are hindi keywords. Please help.. thanks with regards Ranveer K Kumar On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: hello, take a look at field type textgen (a general unstemmed text field) the whitespacetokenizer + worddelimiterfilter used by this type will work correctly for hindi tokenization and punctuation. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ranveer kumar ranveer.k.ku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am very new in solr. I download latest release 1.4 and install. For Indexing and Searching I am using SolrJ api. My Question is How to enable solr to search hindi language text ?. Please Help me.. thanks with regards Ranveer K Kumar -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
Hindi language support in solr
Hi all, I am very new in solr. I download latest release 1.4 and install. For Indexing and Searching I am using SolrJ api. My Question is How to enable solr to search hindi language text ?. Please Help me.. thanks with regards Ranveer K Kumar
