Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
Le 17/05/2010 17:49, Marco Martinez a écrit : No, the equivalent for this will be: - A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler Hey, let's say I have : - a field named A with specific contents - a field named B with specific contents - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) ?? Thanks, Xavier yes you're right I figured it after posting.
Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
No, the equivalent for this will be: - A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler > Hey, > > let's say I have : > > - a field named A with specific contents > > - a field named B with specific contents > > - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. > > Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : > > - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) > - C: (the lazy fox) > > ?? > > Thanks, > > Xavier > > > >
Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
Le 17/05/2010 16:57, Xavier Schepler a écrit : Hey, let's say I have : - a field named A with specific contents - a field named B with specific contents - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) ?? Thanks, Xavier I made some tests and it appears than the second query is much faster than the first ...
