On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:20, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:49:36 -0500
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than an
interface?
It's a high priority for another milestone. It is not slated for the
current iteration. Though, when I did that, I didn't know if there would
be another RC, so I marked it ahead. But at this point, there's no
reason not to go ahead and do it this weekend.
Just to clarify, we're simply docuementing the design rationale. There
are not any plans to change how the ActionForm works right now.
And you're really going to have to break both of my arms and/or kick me
out of Struts development if you want ActionForm *ever* changed to an
interface again -- in *any* future Struts release. I think it's an
absolutely horrible idea, for reasons that have been documented way too
many times to count.
Come on Craig, tell us how you *really* feelLOL!!
Craig McClanahan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James Mitchell
Software Developer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
