Re: [sugar] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
Awesome! Thanks Bernie for taking this task. See you soon, Tomeu On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, while the exact schedule is still being work out, we now have a confirmed location: Training Room, 5th floor, Cambridge Innovation Center http://www.cictr.com/about.html The room -- courtesy of Open Learning Exchange (http://www.ole.org/) -- can host up to 45 people and is equipped with a 1024x768 projector, a huge whiteboard. Open wi-fi will be available, along with some yummy snacks from a nearby kitchen (mens sana in corpore sano). It is booked for these dates: Mon 17 12:00 - 17:00 Tue 189:00 - 17:00 Wed 199:00 - 17:00 We can probably stay after hours -- to be confirmed. Otherwise, we'll just head to a pub with free wi-fi and continue from there ;-) Walter is looking for another place for Thursday and Friday. We can probably use the Media Lab for the weekend. Participants please updarte the wiki with your ETA and whether you still need accommodation: http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp Mel, SJ and C.Scott: let's have a meeting tomorrow @ 2PM to partition the available time between Sugar talks, Sugar Labs marketing, OLPC employee meetings and the much anticipated Sugar hackathon. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mel, SJ and C.Scott: let's have a meeting tomorrow @ 2PM to partition the available time between Sugar talks, Sugar Labs marketing, OLPC employee meetings and the much anticipated Sugar hackathon. Christian Schmidt is interested to come and give a talk and hold a brainstorming session about UI. Saturday would work best for him, can we reserve a slot of the schedule for it? Thanks, Marco ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] ShoeBot (a free software DrawBot implementation) is out! Time to Sugarize some Ruby apps?
I tried some of the graphics libraries that use JavaScript + the canvas tag in Browse: * http://azarask.in/projects/algorithm-ink/ * http://glimr.rubyforge.org/cake/canvas.html * http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/basic/ * more examples at https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Drawing_Graphics_with_Canvas#See_also Unfortunately, Algorithm Ink (the most fun site to play around in) is deathly slow on the XO-1. The JavaScript and cairo tuning in Gecko 1.9.1 (the core of Firefox 3.1) should help. -- =S Page ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] greasemonkey and firefox3
Greasemonkey implements javascripts which are stored in a location specified by firefox. On my XO with 767, I have a script 'topics-offlineuserjs.user.js' which is located at: /home/olpc/isolation/1/gid_to_data_dir/10023/.mozilla/firefox/3kiawx2f.default/gm_scripts/topics-offlineuserjs.user.js I either need to find a way to tell Firefox where the script is (/home/olpc/Activities/Firefox-6.activity) or find a way that subsequent executions of Firefox can find this location. Do you have any advice for a stable location for this file? Tony ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Christian Schmidt is interested to come and give a talk and hold a brainstorming session about UI. Saturday would work best for him, can we reserve a slot of the schedule for it? Great! Please, update the list of proposals with these details. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in place of some of the custom solutions used now (xmlrpc instead of dbus perhaps?). I would also like to talk about using the colaboration API to talk to external services not on the jabber network(a moodle server for instance). As well as a possibly a few API changes to make these sorts of services easier to access for activity developers. Having a standards base and flexible collaboration framework that extends beyond the sugar ecosystem offers some very interesting possibilities. I would also like to discuss some of the jabber scalability problems, as well as how we manage grouping students into classes, and collaborating with other schools over the internet. If people thinks this is a good idea for discussion I will add it to the wiki. Thanks! --- Brendan Powers Resara LLC 1.888.357.9195 www.resara.com - Original Message - From: Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Christian Marc Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED], IAEP [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sugar List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 12:20:45 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York Subject: Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Christian Schmidt is interested to come and give a talk and hold a brainstorming session about UI. Saturday would work best for him, can we reserve a slot of the schedule for it? Great! Please, update the list of proposals with these details. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in place of some of the custom solutions used now (xmlrpc instead of dbus perhaps?). I would also like to talk about using the colaboration API to talk to external services not on the jabber network(a moodle server for instance). As well as a possibly a few API changes to make these sorts of services easier to access for activity developers. Having a standards base and flexible collaboration framework that extends beyond the sugar ecosystem offers some very interesting possibilities. I would also like to discuss some of the jabber scalability problems, as well as how we manage grouping students into classes, and collaborating with other schools over the internet. If people thinks this is a good idea for discussion I will add it to the wiki. I'm very interested in it. Unfortunately we won't have the Collabora guys at Sugarcamp, but I think we should discuss collaboration anyway (maybe we can involve them in some way remotely?). +1 about adding to the wiki by me :) Marco ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [RELEASE] Jukebox v3 released
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some notes on the sources: can you make those 644: Jukebox.activity/activity/activity.info Jukebox.activity/NEWS Jukebox.activity/jukeboxactivity.py and add a license field in activity.info http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_bundles#.info_File_Format There is no jukebox component in the d.l.o tracker - as I understand you are the new maintainer - shall I add one? Sorry for the late reply , I made a new release after fixing the issues. Please add me as the new maintainer , my trac username: kushal Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in place of some of the custom solutions used now (xmlrpc instead of dbus perhaps?). I would also like to talk about using the colaboration API to talk to external services not on the jabber network(a moodle server for instance). As well as a possibly a few API changes to make these sorts of services easier to access for activity developers. Having a standards base and flexible collaboration framework that extends beyond the sugar ecosystem offers some very interesting possibilities. I would also like to discuss some of the jabber scalability problems, as well as how we manage grouping students into classes, and collaborating with other schools over the internet. If people thinks this is a good idea for discussion I will add it to the wiki. I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability. I'm also quite curious about how Sugar runs in a LTSP environment and the challenges we can find there, so maybe Resara could talk a bit about that as well? Thanks, Tomeu ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in place of some of the custom solutions used now (xmlrpc instead of dbus perhaps?). I would also like to talk about using the colaboration API to talk to external services not on the jabber network(a moodle server for instance). As well as a possibly a few API changes to make these sorts of services easier to access for activity developers. Having a standards base and flexible collaboration framework that extends beyond the sugar ecosystem offers some very interesting possibilities. I would also like to discuss some of the jabber scalability problems, as well as how we manage grouping students into classes, and collaborating with other schools over the internet. If people thinks this is a good idea for discussion I will add it to the wiki. I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability. I'm interested in the topic as well -- we're already mapping out the space with ejabberd scalability issues, group handling and moodle integration on the server side of things. Integrating ejabberd and Moodle seems like the natural thing to do, I have to say. And ejabberd scalability issues, I think we have them well diagnosed -- though one of them is somewhat hard to fix. cheers, m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] How To Test An Activity instructions (testers needed!)
A new draft of the How To Test An Activity page (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_to_test_an_Activity) is up, and needs testers! If you are interested in testing, please grab an Activity (see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities to choose one), reply-all to this message so we know what Activities you're testing, and walk through steps 1 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_to_test_an_Activity#Pick_an_Activity, 2 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_to_test_an_Activity#Look_at_existing_resources, and 3 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_to_test_an_Activity#Product_and_Oracle_.28wiki_page.29, which are the ones that are currently complete. (Since each section builds on the ones before, I wanted to get feedback on the current draft first before building more.) Leave your comments on the talk page http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Talk:How_to_test_an_Activityaction=edit. This will encourage me to finish this page and make it better, faster. It would be great to get this feedback before our next Community Testing meeting, which is on IRC in *#olpc-meeting* on November 13 (Thursday), 22:00UTC/5pmEST. Thanks to Brian Jordan and Greg Dekoenigsberg, who are already trying these out for the Paint and Speak Activities! If you're interested in helping out on these instructions, please jump in and edit - feel free to grab me on IRC or email if you have questions, or want a more specific bite-sized volunteer assignment (I have many, and desperately need extra hands). Thanks, everyone! -- Mel Chua QA/Support Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability. I'm also quite curious about how Sugar runs in a LTSP environment and the challenges we can find there, so maybe Resara could talk a bit about that as well? It would be great to talk about sugar in ltsp environments. I think that the jabber, and ltsp stuff are mostly 2 different issues, although they have some things in common. I could put them both down on the wiki, and we could just talk about one after the other. That would be great. There is a bit of work started on that front. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
Brendan R. Powers wrote: I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in place of some of the custom solutions used now (xmlrpc instead of dbus perhaps?). I would also like to talk about using the colaboration API to talk to external services not on the jabber network(a moodle server for instance). As well as a possibly a few API changes to make these sorts of services easier to access for activity developers. Having a standards base and flexible collaboration framework that extends beyond the sugar ecosystem offers some very interesting possibilities. I would also like to discuss some of the jabber scalability problems, as well as how we manage grouping students into classes, and collaborating with other schools over the internet. If people thinks this is a good idea for discussion I will add it to the wiki. By all means, yes! Make sure you also involve Martin Langhoff (school server architect) and either Morgan Collet or Robert McQueen (not sure who of them worked more on the Sugar/Jabber integration). Cc'ing them all :-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
Brendan R. Powers wrote: It would be great to talk about sugar in ltsp environments. I think that the jabber, and ltsp stuff are mostly 2 different issues, although they have some things in common. I could put them both down on the wiki, and we could just talk about one after the other. David Van Assche (cc'd) has already been working in this direction, although I'm not sure he can make it for the Sugarcamp. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] [PATCH] Remove the hacks for asking the X server for screenshots and use gtk.Widget.get_snapshot() instead.
Hi,
just so this patch doesn't get lost while we rebase to F10, we should
apply it once OLPC rebases and check the performance improvement.
Regards,
Tomeu
From 96b5ec2fac8081fc41c698a347d7c8f529f9da70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:34:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove the hacks for asking the X server for screenshots and use gtk.Widget.get_snapshot() instead.
---
src/sugar/Makefile.am |4 +-
src/sugar/_sugarext.defs | 45 -
src/sugar/_sugarext.override |1 -
src/sugar/activity/activity.py | 39 ++-
src/sugar/sugar-preview.c | 139
src/sugar/sugar-preview.h | 62 --
tests/graphics/preview.py | 43
7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 324 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 src/sugar/sugar-preview.c
delete mode 100644 src/sugar/sugar-preview.h
delete mode 100644 tests/graphics/preview.py
diff --git a/src/sugar/Makefile.am b/src/sugar/Makefile.am
index dabb35d..fb87bf6 100644
--- a/src/sugar/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/sugar/Makefile.am
@@ -56,9 +56,7 @@ _sugarext_la_SOURCES = \
sugar-key-grabber.c \
sugar-key-grabber.h \
sugar-menu.h \
- sugar-menu.c \
- sugar-preview.h \
- sugar-preview.c
+ sugar-menu.c
BUILT_SOURCES = \
_sugarext.c \
diff --git a/src/sugar/_sugarext.defs b/src/sugar/_sugarext.defs
index c18e707..a6befa4 100644
--- a/src/sugar/_sugarext.defs
+++ b/src/sugar/_sugarext.defs
@@ -29,13 +29,6 @@
(gtype-id SUGAR_TYPE_GRID)
)
-(define-object Preview
- (in-module Sugar)
- (parent GObject)
- (c-name SugarPreview)
- (gtype-id SUGAR_TYPE_PREVIEW)
-)
-
(define-object IconEntry
(in-module Sexy)
(parent GtkEntry)
@@ -248,44 +241,6 @@
(return-type none)
)
-;; From sugar-preview.h
-
-(define-function sugar_preview_get_type
- (c-name sugar_preview_get_type)
- (return-type GType)
-)
-
-(define-method take_screenshot
- (of-object SugarPreview)
- (c-name sugar_preview_take_screenshot)
- (return-type none)
- (parameters
-'(GtkWidget widget)
- )
-)
-
-(define-method set_size
- (of-object SugarPreview)
- (c-name sugar_preview_set_size)
- (return-type none)
- (parameters
-'(int width)
-'(int height)
- )
-)
-
-(define-method clear
- (of-object SugarPreview)
- (c-name sugar_preview_clear)
- (return-type none)
-)
-
-(define-method get_pixbuf
- (of-object SugarPreview)
- (c-name sugar_preview_get_pixbuf)
- (return-type GdkPixbuf*)
-)
-
;; From eggsmclient.h
(define-function egg_sm_client_get_type
diff --git a/src/sugar/_sugarext.override b/src/sugar/_sugarext.override
index 39b5385..6b768bb 100644
--- a/src/sugar/_sugarext.override
+++ b/src/sugar/_sugarext.override
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ headers
#include sugar-grid.h
#include sugar-key-grabber.h
#include sugar-menu.h
-#include sugar-preview.h
#include sexy-icon-entry.h
#include gsm-session.h
#include gsm-xsmp.h
diff --git a/src/sugar/activity/activity.py b/src/sugar/activity/activity.py
index 39c2f48..3ab1aa8 100644
--- a/src/sugar/activity/activity.py
+++ b/src/sugar/activity/activity.py
@@ -469,20 +469,12 @@ class Activity(Window, gtk.Container):
self.connect('realize', self.__realize_cb)
self.connect('delete-event', self.__delete_event_cb)
-# watch visibility-notify-events to know when we can safely
-# take a screenshot of the activity
-self.add_events(gtk.gdk.VISIBILITY_NOTIFY_MASK)
-self.connect('visibility-notify-event',
- self.__visibility_notify_event_cb)
-self._fully_obscured = True
-
self._active = False
self._activity_id = handle.activity_id
self._pservice = presenceservice.get_instance()
self.shared_activity = None
self._share_id = None
self._join_id = None
-self._preview = _sugarext.Preview()
self._updating_jobject = False
self._closing = False
self._quit_requested = False
@@ -727,10 +719,15 @@ class Activity(Window, gtk.Container):
self._jobject = None
def _get_preview(self):
-pixbuf = self._preview.get_pixbuf()
-if pixbuf is None:
+
+if self.canvas is None or not hasattr(self.canvas, 'get_snapshot'):
return None
+pixmap = self.canvas.get_snapshot((-1, -1, 0, 0))
+width, height = pixmap.get_size()
+pixbuf = gtk.gdk.Pixbuf(gtk.gdk.COLORSPACE_RGB, 0, 8, width, height)
+pixbuf = pixbuf.get_from_drawable(pixmap, pixmap.get_colormap(),
+ 0, 0, 0, 0, width, height)
pixbuf = pixbuf.scale_simple(style.zoom(300), style.zoom(225),
gtk.gdk.INTERP_BILINEAR)
@@ -741,8 +738,6 @@ class Activity(Window, gtk.Container):
pixbuf.save_to_callback(save_func, 'png', user_data=preview_data)
preview_data = ''.join(preview_data)
-
Re: [sugar] add xcompmgr to the olpc-development stream builds
Erik Garrison wrote: I have attached a patch to bin/sugar.in which launches xcompmgr prior to starting matchbox. I have not tested this as I don't have a recent build of Sugar to test on an XO. In 8.2 it was possible to achieve the same result by adding a hook to main.py. On IRC I said we'd be better off moving this to olpc-session, so the Sugar codebase should stay clear of platform-specific support. However, I noticed we also run the window manager from there and it would make a lot of sense to keep the composing manager next to it. Some modern window managers even do both things. Perhaps these things should be moved to olpc-session? Either way, it could be done at a later point with a separate patch. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] add xcompmgr to the olpc-development stream builds
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I noticed we also run the window manager from there and it would make a lot of sense to keep the composing manager next to it. Some modern window managers even do both things. Perhaps these things should be moved to olpc-session? Either way, it could be done at a later point with a separate patch. I'm trying to stay more or less consistent with the separation between DM and desktop session, for practical reasons (Sugar needs to work fine if runned from gdm, for example). olpc-session is the equivalent of a DM, so I don't think it should run the window manager, nor the composite manager. Marco ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar on Edubuntu
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:18 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main, and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable, iirc. Its pretty much the same policy as debian. Scratch was recently rejected from MOTU for the similar reasons. Would it be such a problem if squeak (and other not-squeaky-clean components of sugar) were in ubuntu restricted or debian restricted? vik ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] from [geeks] : NodeBox art, animation and visualization via Python
Dave Crossland wrote: Ricardo Lafuente hello at ricardolafuente.com is working on a totally free software version of Nodebox. This is now available at www.tinkerhouse.net/shoebot/ ! :-) -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/from--geeks--%3A-NodeBox-art%2C-animation-and-visualization-via-Python-tp435818p1470342.html Sent from the OLPC Sugar mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] Sugarcamp hackathon (Was: Re: November conference (meeting notes))
Hey Mel, Sounds like a great event. I will be in Boston the weekend before and the weekend after the meeting, so I can help out where ever you need. Thanks david Also, a public thanks to Mel for providing me a place to stay during the event! On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Mel Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awesome. Ok, we're on. http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp_hackathon Please spread the word to all the Boston-area Sugar/Activity developers you know; I'm copying the local university chapters and the Boston-area OLPC list on this email so they're in the loop. Still looking for a location, but the date (and rough time) are set - evening of Nov. 17, which is a Monday and the first day of G1G1. -Mel Samuel Klein wrote: Nice. A good point about Thanksgiving week -- the converse is that the week before is often midterms for students. But there are a number of local activity developers (or would-be devs who haven't finished their first!) that would be excited to join. SJ On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Mel Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like an *excellent* plan to me! I'd be certainly glad to participate and I'm sure will be the same for Tomeu. We can also involve some Boston local activity authors to help out mentoring. Great! So if Tomeu or any other core Sugar dev can commit to being a second, I'll lock in the date, get a place, and start the gears in motion. (I'm already starting to look for locations and the like right now, but nothing firm yet.) Sounds very good, you can count on me as well. Thanks, Tomeu ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov
Thanks Marco. Friday may also be a possibility for me, if that would be easier to schedule. Christian _ From: Marco Pesenti Gritti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bernie Innocenti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: IAEP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sugar List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Christian Marc Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:04:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mel, SJ and C.Scott: let's have a meeting tomorrow @ 2PM to partition the available time between Sugar talks, Sugar Labs marketing, OLPC employee meetings and the much anticipated Sugar hackathon. Christian Schmidt is interested to come and give a talk and hold a brainstorming session about UI. Saturday would work best for him, can we reserve a slot of the schedule for it? Thanks, Marco ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
