RE: [freenet-support] A few basic questions
b/w As a photographer that means black and white On the Internet it often means by the way What does it mean here? some use b/w for bandwidth... ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Rantsies
Good to hear. Wonder if it is because of working NGR or simply because the unstable network is smaller.. I believe that this isn't known yet. Don't things work better when it's bigger? :-) It should do.. If routing was working well and able to cope with the growth and load balancing. Hmm.. Well.. Actually they both speak exactly the same language.. The Then, no reason why 'stable' couldn't actually talk well with other stable nodes and ngr ones? And just keep the unstable only dealing with ngr for testing? As of yesterday there where three types of nodes.. Stable, all non-NGR Unstable, anti-NGR (build 6281) Unstable, NGR (build 6281+) The previous two types could talk to each other.. The last type could only talk to its siblings Hmmm.. Not play really.. The intention is to make it work... Perception skewers reality. I don't know WHY unstable works, but I see that it does. I tested again yesterday with stable (getting new seednodes) and I still couldn't *do* anything. Ie, couldn't retrieve any 'known' keys. So, either all the linked content just isn't there any more on 'stable', or something is still broke. Whether by luck or talent, it seems that they have gotten unstable 'working'. Possibly anti-NGR... Probabilistic caching. Prevent nodes from caching data whose source they aren't routing-wise close to. Why? I don't understand this... ideally, shouldn't a node cache *everything* that runs through it, given enough space? It does, until the DS is 90% full.. After that it tries to enhance specialization by selectively accept stuff into its store.. NGR Keep track of not only which nodes have what data.. Also keep track of how fast they can supply it. Err, um... keep track of what nodes have what data? That doesn't sound like a good idea at all. Hopefully, you mean, keep track of what nodes can GET what data. I hope, at least, that would be the way it works. No, I don't have the GPL, but I know someone who can get it for ya... I'm just passing your request on... Right, my mistake.. Problem #8: OCO. Massive amounts of CPU is used for connection negotiations due to heavy encryption stuff used in there. OCO amplified this latent issue. I read Toad's roadmap, and it seems that at least udp is being considered. Great. This is how it SHOULD be done: Or, at least, an option. If you're on lower bandwidth, udp should be fine, no? And solves having a ton of connections always open. It'd put more load on the machine, but, probably still acceptable. The problem is not the TCP connections.. It is all about FNP connections (currently over TCP but they would have the same problem even over UDP). The problem is that two nodes has to autheticate with each other to verify that the Peer is who he says he is.. This is true no matter if the underlying transport would be TCP or UDP. 1. Multiplexing, would allow a single connections to send multiple messages simultaneously thereby enabling us to keep only one single connection open to each node, compared to keeping one free connection the each node. Ah, so THAT is why I see so multiple instances of a node in the OC window? Because this is yet to be done? Yep. If someone wants to add missing things to the list then feel free to do so. That's a pretty nice list, and certainly gives me a new perspective. Good, that was the intention :) There is no play involved.. Most everything is done for a quite good reason :) Nahh.. They don't really dismiss it.. They just want things to start working at all first :) Any help would be very appreciated. I think they're doing a good job with unstable. It just is non-intuitive that your best hope is NOT to get the stable release: I think it'd be helpful for the main page to reflect that unstable isn't really so much 'broken' as 'in need of constant update'. Meaning, if you are downloading the latest build each day, chances are you're probably be better off than downloading the stable at all. But, that's just my experience so far. Usually stable is the best hope.. It is just that here has been a rough couple of months lately.. /N ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Help Respond Soon
What kind of error messages do you see? And also are you using some kind of broadband router/software firewall /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Red Dem0n Sent: den 25 oktober 2003 23:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Help Respond Soon I've been trying to get this Freenet to load the websites but its not doing it at all. I have been leaving it on for a long time now. Right now I have 2.40ghz, 768DDRRAM, and cable modem. I would like to know what I should set my settings to so I can get the best results possible and make the pages load more faster, because I havent been able to get any to load except the main page which takes forever to load the little images. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] browser
freenet has co opted my browser. when i log on to the net my browser would default to my ISP(earthlink) homepage.now it defaults to 127.0.0.1:. i cannot get it to go to any other website. even by using favorites or history. the default browser for earthlink is IE 6.0. this also happens to be how i access my mail. any ideas? --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] browser
Title: Message How about using the 'Address' field then? I allows you to navigate to ANY web page in the whole wide world. Also, you can type in any start page you want in 'Tools\Internet Options\Home page'. If that doesn't work then I would suggest that you have a talk with Microsoft. And if you cannot remember the address of your previous 'Earthlink' start page then I suggest you have a talk with Earthlink. /N -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert GreenageSent: den 29 oktober 2003 15:08To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [freenet-support] browser freenet has co opted my browser. when i log on to the net my browser would default to my ISP(earthlink) homepage.now it defaults to 127.0.0.1:. i cannot get it to go to any other website. even by using favorites or history. the default browser for earthlink is IE 6.0. this also happens to be how i access my mail. any ideas? --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] browser
This is nothing to do with Freenet. It sounds like you've accidentally set 127.0.0.1: as your homepage. Did you know that if you accidentally press CTRL+D while using IE 6.0 it will set the current page to be your homepage? It sounds as if this is what you have done. If you're using IE 6.0 you can set your homepage by clicking on Tools, Internet Options, and typing a new address where it says Address: If you want to set it back to Earthlink's homepage, the address you should enter is probably http://start.earthlink.net/ Favourites and History have nothing to do with your homepage. Favourites and History manage your favourites (on the Favourites menu and the Links toolbar) and your history (shows you which pages you've visited recently) respectively. Freenet does *not* change a browser's homepage setting. Only the user can do this themselves. hope this helps, d freenet has co opted my browser. when i log on to the net my browser would default to my ISP(earthlink) homepage.now it defaults to 127.0.0.1:. i cannot get it to go to any other website. even by using favorites or history. the default browser for earthlink is IE 6.0. this also happens to be how i access my mail. any ideas? --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet.___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] browser
tools - options - connections - lan settings. Fill in the correct proxy information, or no proxy information, as required by earthlink. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Robert GreenageSent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:08 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [freenet-support] browser freenet has co opted my browser. when i log on to the net my browser would default to my ISP(earthlink) homepage.now it defaults to 127.0.0.1:. i cannot get it to go to any other website. even by using favorites or history. the default browser for earthlink is IE 6.0. this also happens to be how i access my mail. any ideas? --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Re: Support Digest, Vol 3, Issue 38
I don't see any error messages at all, I figured maybe it was something due to the uptime of the program so i kept it on about 10-12 hours, and the only difference I saw was that when I started Freenet it was at a load of 100%, after the 10-12 hours it was at a load of 0%. So I'm guessing there might be something wrong with the settings, although it is under the default settings at the moment. There's no router/software firewall I have right now so that couldnt be the issue. Message: 5 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:54:30 +0100 From: Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Help Respond Soon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii What kind of error messages do you see? And also are you using some kind of broadband router/software firewall /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Red Dem0n Sent: den 25 oktober 2003 23:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Help Respond Soon I've been trying to get this Freenet to load the websites but its not doing it at all. I have been leaving it on for a long time now. Right now I have 2.40ghz, 768DDRRAM, and cable modem. I would like to know what I should set my settings to so I can get the best results possible and make the pages load more faster, because I havent been able to get any to load except the main page which takes forever to load the little images. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Re: Support Digest, Vol 3, Issue 38
Hmm.. Ok, so what exacltly is it that doesn't work for you? Is it getting the ActiveLinks in the web interface? Is it navigating to a freesite? If it is the second then you should get a message saying something like 'Route not found' or possibly 'Data not found' or something.. What does the page you get say? /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Red Dem0n Sent: den 29 oktober 2003 16:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Support Digest, Vol 3, Issue 38 I don't see any error messages at all, I figured maybe it was something due to the uptime of the program so i kept it on about 10-12 hours, and the only difference I saw was that when I started Freenet it was at a load of 100%, after the 10-12 hours it was at a load of 0%. So I'm guessing there might be something wrong with the settings, although it is under the default settings at the moment. There's no router/software firewall I have right now so that couldnt be the issue. Message: 5 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:54:30 +0100 From: Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Help Respond Soon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii What kind of error messages do you see? And also are you using some kind of broadband router/software firewall /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Red Dem0n Sent: den 25 oktober 2003 23:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Help Respond Soon I've been trying to get this Freenet to load the websites but its not doing it at all. I have been leaving it on for a long time now. Right now I have 2.40ghz, 768DDRRAM, and cable modem. I would like to know what I should set my settings to so I can get the best results possible and make the pages load more faster, because I havent been able to get any to load except the main page which takes forever to load the little images. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Re: A few basic questions
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:34:21 -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: b/w As a photographer that means black and white On the Internet it often means by the way What does it mean here? bandwidth? mihi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Waited more than 200ms to dequeue
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 36 in queue,1498 millis since enqueued last item, 288503 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. Build: 6286 java version "1.4.2_01"Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition(build 1.4.2_01-b06)Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_01-b06, mixedmode) Debian stable2.4.18-bf2.4 RegardsSøren Yahoo! Mail - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og virusscan___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] browser
Some are just a little short on being helpful. Tell the poor guy how to get his mail. You are not helping him by telling him to use one of his other browsers without advise on at least how to get his mail. I have a machine set up with Linux; unfortunately it DOES NOT RUN the majority of third party software. Most of us really don't want to be limited to just three main packages. And do recall that most of the user aids are about as useful on Linux as the instructions on Microsoft's own operating system. Third party software in the MS world does have pretty good user instructions and even some of the help systems are pretty good (wish I could say the same for the Gate's Help Files or even most Linux instructions that forgot the dictionary of jargon -- like most of the instructions on FreeNet). I'm not a particular lover of MS ware. I have one machine with an MS operating system on it that absolutely refuses to access the Internet, but short of a reformat of the primary disk, I can well appreciate it never will. The MS system is pure crap when it messes up itself. [Original Message] From: David McNab [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 10/30/2003 8:32:32 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] browser On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:26, Robert Greenage wrote: I have received many answers to my problem. However, none have worked.When I log on to my ISP IE6.0 loads and automatically goes to 127.0.0.1.:. then I get the error message res://C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\SHDOCLC.DLL/dnserror.dns. In properties the correct earthlink address is the default start page. And the address is correct.I can start other browsers opera and Mozilla. I can also access the earthlink start page with those browsers. The problem of email is the major issue. I even reinstalled IE 6.0 without any success. Please help. You answered your own question, Robert - choose another browser. Opera and Mozilla are both excellent. My choice would be Mozilla because of its superior standards compliance. Your loyalty to Microsoft is horrifically misplaced. M$ internet apps are the single biggest risk to your online security. Give them up. Use some *real* softare. (I won't admonish you here to use a *real* operating system like Linux, BSD or OSX, because *that* could be seen as trolling.) Cheers David --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. [Original Message] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 10/29/03 8:14:46 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] browser This is nothing to do with Freenet. It sounds like you've accidentally set 127.0.0.1: as your homepage. Did you know that if you accidentally press CTRL+D while using IE 6.0 it will set the current page to be your homepage? It sounds as if this is what you have done. If you're using IE 6.0 you can set your homepage by clicking on Tools, Internet Options, and typing a new address where it says Address: If you want to set it back to Earthlink's homepage, the address you should enter is probably http://start.earthlink.net/ Favourites and History have nothing to do with your homepage. Favourites and History manage your favourites (on the Favourites menu and the Links toolbar) and your history (shows you which pages you've visited recently) respectively. Freenet does *not* change a browser's homepage setting. Only the user can do this themselves. hope this helps, d freenet has co opted my browser. when i log on to the net my browser would default to my ISP(earthlink) homepage.now it defaults to 127.0.0.1:. i cannot get it to go to any other website. even by using favorites or history. the default browser for earthlink is IE 6.0. this also happens to be how i access my mail. any ideas? --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet.___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- Cheers David ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Transient node detected
when Launching Frost I get this. ( Transient node detected You are running a TRANSIENT node. Better run a PERMANENT freenet node. ) How do I run a PERMANENT freenet node? I currently have a DSL and Cable internet connection and can leave my comp's on all the time. I am also willing to donate my space and bandwith - and computer skills to help freenet. Thanks Phil Deck ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] 5029 overloads
What is your thread limit? From the looks of that it is incredibly low... Also, are you using YThreads or QThreads... what you might want to do is increase your thread limit to something closer to 200 or 300 and change to YThreads. --B On Wed, 10/29/03 at 22:06:53 -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: I've been running 5029 for over a day. I noticed recently that outgoing bandwidth decreased significantly. Is this problem already known about? From General Information: Current routingTime 207ms Curent messageSendTimeRequest 496ms Pooled threads running jobs 47 (117.5%) Pooled threads which are idle 45 Current upstream bandwidth usage 2962 bytes/second (24.1%) Reason for refusing connections: activeThreads(47) = maximumThreads (40) Reason for QueryRejecting requests: Estimated load (100%) overloadLow (85%) It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load100% [Rejecting incoming connections and requests!] Reason for load: Load due to thread limit = 117.5% Load due to routingTime = 73.1% = 85% + 15% * (207.953 - 1000.000) / 1000.000 = overloadLow (85%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 82.5% = 85% + 15% * (496.871 - 1000.000) / 3000.000 = overloadLow (85%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(177714) = limit (589824.009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (12288) * 60 From Environment: Thread Pool Total pooled threads 75 Available pooled threads 34 Pooled threads in use 41 Pooled Thread Consumers Class Threads used Checkpoint: Connection opener 1 freenet.Message: Accepted 1 freenet.Message: DataNotFound 1 freenet.Message: DataReply1 freenet.Message: DataRequest 1 freenet.Message: QueryRejected2 freenet.Message: QueryRestarted 1 freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterface$ConnectionShell 12 freenet.node.states.data.DataStateInitiator 14 freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:true5 freenet.node.states.request.RequestInitiator 2 -Martin ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
