Re: [freenet-support] doctype and other html tags through fproxy
Michal Charemza wrote: !DOCTYPE, instead of !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it remove/shorten them? Also, I've noticed that the default gateway page does have a full doctype tag, why, if Yes, because you could harvest the visitors' IP addresses by putting the DTD to your own WWW server and waiting for the visitors' browsers to automatically retrieve it. is fproxy that removes the tags from freesites, does it let this one through? Fproxy doesn't filter it's own pages, just the freesites. 2. I have noticed on some pages they have this sort of section in the header: !--index titleThe Freedom Engine/title categoryIndex/category descriptionThe mother of all freesite link lists./description activelinkActiveLink.jpg/activelink address typeDBR/address type authorCofE/author -- What are all the tags for? Is there a list of all the tags you can put in this section somewhere? These tags were used with TFEE, an index site with an automatic spider. DFI's spider might still use them, though. -- Mika Hirvonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] doctype and other html tags through fproxy
!DOCTYPE, instead of !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah The test site I inserted into my own node did have a full doctype tag when I wrote it, but it didn't when I retrieved it, it just had !DOCTYPE. Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it remove/shorten them? Also, I've noticed that the default gateway page does have a full doctype tag, why, if is fproxy that removes the tags from freesites, does it let this one through? This is a very likely possibility because the doctype makes reference to a W3C DTD which is a public internet link. The annonymity filter needs to remove references to internet sites since most browsers will send a referral URL that invades your privacy (it essence if the web browser goes to the validation site it will do so with the address of the page you are viewing. This invades your privacy becomes someone reading the access logs can find out what freesite you were visiting). The government could subpoena W3C's weblogs to find out about freesite accesses and they'll have an IP number attached to the visit to their site so the referral freesite URI + the IP number access in W3C's log could be used against you if the material you were accessing is outlawed in the jurisdiction of W3C's server or any government system that sees packets along the route to W3C. They could visit the same freesite by the referal URI and find out what book you were reading at the time 2. I have noticed on some pages they have this sort of section in the header: !--index titleThe Freedom Engine/title categoryIndex/category descriptionThe mother of all freesite link lists./description activelinkActiveLink.jpg/activelink address typeDBR/address type authorCofE/author -- These are the meta tags used by freesites to support their inclusion onto the various indexing freesites. title - ovbious, this is the site's name category - what kind of site is this? I don't have knowledge about what acceptable values for this are description - textual description of the freesite activelink - the site icon to be associated with your freesite (think like the little banner icons many people put onto their regular internet websites for people to link to them with) addresstype - again I'm iffy on all the acceptable values but DBR AFAIK means the address of this freesite permutates automatically to a different site name either daily or weekly at midnight GMT. A site marked as DBR has to reinsert itself at the new DBR generated redirect key or the site effectively disappears (unless you select go to earlier site in the error screen that comes up for references to DBR sites that haven't been updated yet [or your routing can't find the new content yet]). The alternative to DBR is to using revisions by putting an integer in the URI part of your site. You start the integer at 1 on your first insertion of the site. Your site forward references a number of 'editions' ahead (that you have not yet inserted) by refering to the same uri echanging 1 for 2, 2,3 3,4 etc for several steps (usally four or five). You have an activelink image on each edition so on the existing (edition 1) page shows up for edition 1. If you haven't inserted a new edition then the other activelinks show up as broken images. But if at somepoint you insert with the integer now set to 2 the #2 activelink comes alive and the visitor to the #1 site now knows (by the unbroken activelink) that a second edition is now available. To be nice to people that might want to check on older content your edition list should be design so that when more editions are available that your have edition links that you put forward and at least one previous edition so the users can backtrack the editions of your freesite. ie: site using 5 edition links (the numbers in [] would be your edition activelinks) first edition: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] second edition: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] third edition: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] fourth edition: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] fifth edition: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] sixth edition: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] The edition list 'scrolls' as you have more editions than links the user can still follow the backlinks to get to previous editions. Or you can keep a permanent edition list with at least one forward edition link). You'd probably do it with buckets. This following setup would let you do four editions before having having to add another row for the next five editions: while publishing edition 1-4: [ 1] [ 2] [ 3] [ 4] [ 5] while publisihing edition 5-9: [ 1] [ 2] [ 3] [ 4] [ 5] [ 6] [ 7] [ 8] [ 9] [10] while publisihing edition 10-14: [ 1] [ 2] [ 3] [ 4] [ 5] [ 6] [ 7] [ 8] [ 9] [10] [11] [12] [12] [14] [15] while publisihing edition 15-19: [ 1] [ 2] [ 3] [ 4] [ 5] [ 6] [ 7] [ 8] [ 9] [10] [11] [12] [12] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]
[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, this bug is really somewhere inside freenet. Either the accept() call was not handled quick enough (dunno how accept is called in nio) or Fred really closes open sockets without having sent any data. Consistently? Can you write me a test case? Since it has never happened on my node, no; sorry. I could try to write an app that just sets up a bunch of ClientPut requests, but i cannot be sure if they are the reason for the disconnection of fred. BTW i don't have any node atm anyway (my build on hd is 6441 and it hasn't been started for a few months), so i'd have to set up a new node first... Perhaps I'll do that. But not *now*. BTW2 have you fixed that bug where a plain site was detected as a container (i mailed you on 2004-01-10 with a way to reproduce it) and thus unbrowsable? mihi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] How do I add node refs to my node's routing table?
On Sunday 14 March 2004 09:35 pm, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: I'm getting way too many RNF/DNFs so any way to expand the available routing would be a welcome thing either node. about 60% of the time it doesn't even get off the originating node. I've tried putting each other's node's ref into the seedfile but the nodes don't seem to want to use them. As I said earlier the windows version just complains that there are no estimator fieldsets for the noderef and won't import it. RNF's and DNF's occur for various reasons. It could be the network in general is overloaded, or the node holding the key is specifically overloaded or split from the network. However the no estimator fieldsets messsage sounds like a bug.. I will forward the question over to the dev list. As for the rest I couldn't say. On the freebsd node (at the other IP number) the only way I've gotten it to use the other node is by making it the only entiry in the seedfile. This had the disadvantage that not only was is restricted to whereever the windows node could get to its available freenet routes, but to my shock, it wasn't learning about visitors as many freenet docs have suggested the node should be able to. Nodes would connect and it even made outbound connections but it's list of available routes under the node status subsection still reported only one host in the routing table. I've ruled out firewall issues on both sides becuase both sides can negotiate outbound connections and receive inbound connections. I've also double check in the environment and the node are reporting the correct WAN-side router IP numbers and access ports. -- Jay Oliveri GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 FCPTools Maintainer www.sf.net/users/joliveri ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] doctype and other html tags through fproxy
On 15 Mar 2004 at 14:10, Mika Hirvonen wrote: Michal Charemza wrote: !DOCTYPE, instead of !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it remove/shorten them? Also, I've noticed that the default gateway page does have a full doctype tag, why, if Yes, because you could harvest the visitors' IP addresses by putting the DTD to your own WWW server and waiting for the visitors' browsers to automatically retrieve it. What about inline images? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
