[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1186

2008-11-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1186 is now available. Please upgrade, it will be mandatory 
on Tuesday. Changes:
- Fix a nasty race condition in the message handling code. Impact is uncertain 
but could be large - it broke an update-over-mandatory between nodes on the 
same computer in testing.
- Implement (long overdue) update over mandatory for freenet-ext.jar. Normally 
this will fetch both the main jar and the ext jar at the same time, if the 
node is too old to update over Freenet, or if it takes more than 3 hours to 
update. 
- Include the earliest compatible version of freenet-ext.jar in the manifest 
for the main jar. We will use this to ensure compatibility when updating in a 
near future build.
- Limit the size of the auto-detected datastore size to 256GB. This will 
ensure the Bloom filter is of a reasonable size (128MB at most), and avoid 
some crazy situations. Don't limit the Bloom filter size to 256MB any more, 
defaults to 1/2048th of the size of the store up to 2GB filter.
- Make the datastore size default to 100MB. The first-time wizard will 
configure it to a larger size, but the resize will occur online, and this 
gains us a few seconds on the first startup by not having to wait so long for 
preallocating it.
- Minor change to plugin loading and a minor bugfix to connection setup.

Please upgrade! If you find any bugs, please report them on the bug tracker. 
The "not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes" bug is sadly still with 
us, it will be fixed soon.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081129/2daaf22e/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Newbie to 0.7

2008-11-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 29 November 2008 08:38, Level 13 wrote:
> I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of
> 0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the
> computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the
> restrictive default settings about the memory and such).

Welcome! And thanks.
> 
> Now, to my questions... After one day, it still says:
> UDP Darknet port X Status unknown
> UDP Opennet port X Maybe port forwarded
> Why is this so? Both ports ARE port-forwarded, whereas the Darknet is
> not used yet (since I have "no friends" in a manner of speaking).
> However, an occasional packet to one of the ports is filtered every
> now and then, on either hardware firewall or the personal/software
> firewall (I hear it's because UDP packets tend to have problems with
> firewalls - or vice versa...). Other than that, browsing seems to work
> fine.

It is nontrivial to detect whether a port is forwarded or not, especially as 
some symmetric firewalls etc have long timeouts.

W.r.t. dropped packets ... if you have a low MTU and a firewall that drops 
fragmented packets, this can be bad for Freenet. What is your MTU?
> 
> Where is the setting for maximum number of connections the whole thing
> is allowed to maintain (which was pretty obvious in 0.5)? Is it the
> "Maximum number of Opennet peers", which is 20 at max? If so, how come
> only 20 is the upper limit?

20 is indeed the upper limit at the moment. More is not always better. Darknet 
nodes are unlikely to have more than 20, this was part of the thinking.
> 
> About accessing the node from elsewhere in the LAN -- isn't this
> configured in the "Hostnames or IP addresses that are allowed to
> connect to FProxy"? Because I put an internal IP of another computer
> in my LAN there, but I can't access the site from it.

You need to set the addresses to listen on as well.
> 
> As for these two...
> "Directories downloading is allowed to"
> "Directories uploading is allowed to"
> ...if I understand this correctly, putting the string "downloads"
> there will use the path defined in "Default download directory"
> setting (where e.g. I have "x:\download07" (without the quotes) -- is
> this correct)?
> What's the deal with "If this is set to "all" any user can download
> any file to anywhere on your computer!" -- does it actually mean that
> anyone who connects to my node will be able to read just about ANY
> file on the system?

Any user who has access to FCP.
> 
> Oh, and BTW, I got this status message even after the auto-update to
> the latest version:
> 
> 12 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
> even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
> Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at support at freenetproject.org.
> Please include this message and what version of the node you are
> running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your
> bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
> (12 IPs listed here).

Known problem, sorry... will release a build at some point in the near future 
which we believe fixes it, at which point we will need to know if it hasn't 
been fixed.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081129/a1919e59/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Newbie to 0.7

2008-11-29 Thread Level 13
I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of
0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the
computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the
restrictive default settings about the memory and such).

Now, to my questions... After one day, it still says:
UDP Darknet port X Status unknown
UDP Opennet port X Maybe port forwarded
Why is this so? Both ports ARE port-forwarded, whereas the Darknet is
not used yet (since I have "no friends" in a manner of speaking).
However, an occasional packet to one of the ports is filtered every
now and then, on either hardware firewall or the personal/software
firewall (I hear it's because UDP packets tend to have problems with
firewalls - or vice versa...). Other than that, browsing seems to work
fine.

Where is the setting for maximum number of connections the whole thing
is allowed to maintain (which was pretty obvious in 0.5)? Is it the
"Maximum number of Opennet peers", which is 20 at max? If so, how come
only 20 is the upper limit?

About accessing the node from elsewhere in the LAN -- isn't this
configured in the "Hostnames or IP addresses that are allowed to
connect to FProxy"? Because I put an internal IP of another computer
in my LAN there, but I can't access the site from it.

As for these two...
"Directories downloading is allowed to"
"Directories uploading is allowed to"
...if I understand this correctly, putting the string "downloads"
there will use the path defined in "Default download directory"
setting (where e.g. I have "x:\download07" (without the quotes) -- is
this correct)?
What's the deal with "If this is set to "all" any user can download
any file to anywhere on your computer!" -- does it actually mean that
anyone who connects to my node will be able to read just about ANY
file on the system?

Oh, and BTW, I got this status message even after the auto-update to
the latest version:

12 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at support at freenetproject.org.
Please include this message and what version of the node you are
running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your
bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
(12 IPs listed here).



[freenet-support] Newbie to 0.7

2008-11-29 Thread Level 13
I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of
0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the
computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the
restrictive default settings about the memory and such).

Now, to my questions... After one day, it still says:
UDP Darknet port X Status unknown
UDP Opennet port X Maybe port forwarded
Why is this so? Both ports ARE port-forwarded, whereas the Darknet is
not used yet (since I have no friends in a manner of speaking).
However, an occasional packet to one of the ports is filtered every
now and then, on either hardware firewall or the personal/software
firewall (I hear it's because UDP packets tend to have problems with
firewalls - or vice versa...). Other than that, browsing seems to work
fine.

Where is the setting for maximum number of connections the whole thing
is allowed to maintain (which was pretty obvious in 0.5)? Is it the
Maximum number of Opennet peers, which is 20 at max? If so, how come
only 20 is the upper limit?

About accessing the node from elsewhere in the LAN -- isn't this
configured in the Hostnames or IP addresses that are allowed to
connect to FProxy? Because I put an internal IP of another computer
in my LAN there, but I can't access the site from it.

As for these two...
Directories downloading is allowed to
Directories uploading is allowed to
...if I understand this correctly, putting the string downloads
there will use the path defined in Default download directory
setting (where e.g. I have x:\download07 (without the quotes) -- is
this correct)?
What's the deal with If this is set to all any user can download
any file to anywhere on your computer! -- does it actually mean that
anyone who connects to my node will be able to read just about ANY
file on the system?

Oh, and BTW, I got this status message even after the auto-update to
the latest version:

12 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please include this message and what version of the node you are
running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your
bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
(12 IPs listed here).
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Newbie to 0.7

2008-11-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 29 November 2008 08:38, Level 13 wrote:
 I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of
 0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the
 computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the
 restrictive default settings about the memory and such).

Welcome! And thanks.
 
 Now, to my questions... After one day, it still says:
 UDP Darknet port X Status unknown
 UDP Opennet port X Maybe port forwarded
 Why is this so? Both ports ARE port-forwarded, whereas the Darknet is
 not used yet (since I have no friends in a manner of speaking).
 However, an occasional packet to one of the ports is filtered every
 now and then, on either hardware firewall or the personal/software
 firewall (I hear it's because UDP packets tend to have problems with
 firewalls - or vice versa...). Other than that, browsing seems to work
 fine.

It is nontrivial to detect whether a port is forwarded or not, especially as 
some symmetric firewalls etc have long timeouts.

W.r.t. dropped packets ... if you have a low MTU and a firewall that drops 
fragmented packets, this can be bad for Freenet. What is your MTU?
 
 Where is the setting for maximum number of connections the whole thing
 is allowed to maintain (which was pretty obvious in 0.5)? Is it the
 Maximum number of Opennet peers, which is 20 at max? If so, how come
 only 20 is the upper limit?

20 is indeed the upper limit at the moment. More is not always better. Darknet 
nodes are unlikely to have more than 20, this was part of the thinking.
 
 About accessing the node from elsewhere in the LAN -- isn't this
 configured in the Hostnames or IP addresses that are allowed to
 connect to FProxy? Because I put an internal IP of another computer
 in my LAN there, but I can't access the site from it.

You need to set the addresses to listen on as well.
 
 As for these two...
 Directories downloading is allowed to
 Directories uploading is allowed to
 ...if I understand this correctly, putting the string downloads
 there will use the path defined in Default download directory
 setting (where e.g. I have x:\download07 (without the quotes) -- is
 this correct)?
 What's the deal with If this is set to all any user can download
 any file to anywhere on your computer! -- does it actually mean that
 anyone who connects to my node will be able to read just about ANY
 file on the system?

Any user who has access to FCP.
 
 Oh, and BTW, I got this status message even after the auto-update to
 the latest version:
 
 12 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
 even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
 Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
 https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Please include this message and what version of the node you are
 running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your
 bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
 (12 IPs listed here).

Known problem, sorry... will release a build at some point in the near future 
which we believe fixes it, at which point we will need to know if it hasn't 
been fixed.


pgpMdaSaZMs6q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1186

2008-11-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1186 is now available. Please upgrade, it will be mandatory 
on Tuesday. Changes:
- Fix a nasty race condition in the message handling code. Impact is uncertain 
but could be large - it broke an update-over-mandatory between nodes on the 
same computer in testing.
- Implement (long overdue) update over mandatory for freenet-ext.jar. Normally 
this will fetch both the main jar and the ext jar at the same time, if the 
node is too old to update over Freenet, or if it takes more than 3 hours to 
update. 
- Include the earliest compatible version of freenet-ext.jar in the manifest 
for the main jar. We will use this to ensure compatibility when updating in a 
near future build.
- Limit the size of the auto-detected datastore size to 256GB. This will 
ensure the Bloom filter is of a reasonable size (128MB at most), and avoid 
some crazy situations. Don't limit the Bloom filter size to 256MB any more, 
defaults to 1/2048th of the size of the store up to 2GB filter.
- Make the datastore size default to 100MB. The first-time wizard will 
configure it to a larger size, but the resize will occur online, and this 
gains us a few seconds on the first startup by not having to wait so long for 
preallocating it.
- Minor change to plugin loading and a minor bugfix to connection setup.

Please upgrade! If you find any bugs, please report them on the bug tracker. 
The not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes bug is sadly still with 
us, it will be fixed soon.


pgplBydJowJd5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1187

2008-11-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1187 is now available. Mostly minor changes but one was 
important for newly installed nodes:
- Maybe fix darknet peers losing their IP addresses (bug 2688). We were losing 
IPs on connect and on rekeying (every hour!).
- Keep a -1 setting for the Bloom filter size as -1. New nodes start off with 
a 100MB store (prior to 1186 with a 1GB store). The old behaviour would set 
the Bloom filter size once to 1/2048th of the store size: 50K, or 500K for 
pre-1186. Then the post-install wizard would change the store size, but *not* 
the Bloom filter size, resulting in far more false positives than needed, so 
far more disk access than needed.
- Allow MIME types on redirects in ClientPutComplexDir (useful for some client 
apps).
- Italian update from Luke771, and a couple of explanations improved.


pgp19VihLD2Rh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]