[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1197
Freenet 0.7 build 1197 is now available, and is mandatory at midnight. Please upgrade. Nodes with auto-deploy-update disabled may have problems, since in 1195 a bug was introduced which broke the Update Now button, which is fixed in 1197. If you are in this situation please either update manually with update.sh/update.cmd, or turn on "Automatically install new versions" in the updater category (you can turn it back off once the node is running 1197). Apart from that bugfix and related ones, and a small French update from regivanx, I have reverted the recent changes related to long transfer times. Freenet should recover and use as much bandwidth as it was using before now. If you have adjusted your bandwidth limit to compensate for the problems, please change it back. However, this is not the end of the story - it is likely that 1198 will have some changes aimed at eliminating really slow request transfers, but hopefully these changes will be less disruptive. Thanks. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/1baaecac/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security
Ok, so this packet isn't forward to WAN by the router? On 1/13/09, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >> I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet >> port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I >> have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my >> computer (in opennet only)? > > It is sent to your LAN to make it easier to use FCP clients on computers > other > than the one you installed Freenet onto. >> >> (mDNS protocol) >> >> Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local >> Type: SRV (Service location) >> .000 0001 = Class: IN (0x0001) >> 0... = Cache flush: False >> Time to live: X hour >> Data length: X >> Priority: X >> Weight: X >> Port: MY DARKNET PORT >> Target: MY COMPUTER NAME >
[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my computer (in opennet only)? (mDNS protocol) Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local Type: SRV (Service location) .000 0001 = Class: IN (0x0001) 0... = Cache flush: False Time to live: X hour Data length: X Priority: X Weight: X Port: MY DARKNET PORT Target: MY COMPUTER NAME
[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is > > increased by 20 percent. > > > > With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced > > by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are > > backed off), often all nodes are backed off! > > I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. > > Everything is preemptively rejected, due to "Transfer speed (output)". I thought you said (on IRC) that you weren't connected anywhere because you didn't update? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/41378bbe/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] commandline modify config
On Sunday 11 January 2009 17:18, anonymous freenet wrote: > hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows. > reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain > times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big > big? is like 5k upload only. > > sorry if you is receive this times two, i send before but no see. Best way to do this is probably to make a script that talks FCP and sets the config option. http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetFCPSpec2Point0 > > also do you is no you got no archive any more here > http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/. you is need to go here > http://archives.freenetproject.org/list/support.en.html. but this page > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support is still tell > you go old page. > > thanks to all people. > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/dfbf1933/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] some translation in french
Applied in SVN r25051. Will be in the next build. Thanks! Please send translation updates to the devl list next time. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/a534a79c/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet > port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I > have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my > computer (in opennet only)? It is sent to your LAN to make it easier to use FCP clients on computers other than the one you installed Freenet onto. > > (mDNS protocol) > > Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local > Type: SRV (Service location) > .000 0001 = Class: IN (0x0001) > 0... = Cache flush: False > Time to live: X hour > Data length: X > Priority: X > Weight: X > Port: MY DARKNET PORT > Target: MY COMPUTER NAME -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/1106b9a6/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! Peer backoff reasons * FatalTimeout 1 * ForwardRejectedOverload 10 * InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 1 * Took too long (still running) 7 * TransferFailedInsert 1 A moment later : Peer backoff reasons * FatalTimeout 1 * ForwardRejectedOverload 9 * InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 2 * Took too long (still running) 5 * TransferFailedInsert 1 * TransferFailedRequest5 1
[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > > With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is > > > increased by 20 percent. > > > > > > With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is > > > reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected > > > (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! > > > > I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. > > > > Everything is preemptively rejected, due to "Transfer speed > > (output)". > > I thought you said (on IRC) that you weren't connected anywhere > because you didn't update? That was with 1195. With 1196 I do seem able to connect. Currently on opennet, for example, I am connected to 9, and disconnected from 9. The strangers stat's page shows some data flowing between my peers, 0% overload probability, %Time routable ~99.9% for the connected nodes, and 100% for the disconnected nodes :P.
[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is > increased by 20 percent. > > With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced > by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are > backed off), often all nodes are backed off! I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. Everything is preemptively rejected, due to "Transfer speed (output)".
[freenet-support] What did you do to the "Update Now" button in 1195?
Yeah, after about 10 minutes more peers came and now I'm also back to 20 :-) On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM, SmallSister development < smallsister at xs4all.nl> wrote: > For me the manual ugrade with update.sh went smoothly and I am fully > connected (20 "strangers") again on build 1196. > Are you sure you are on build 1196? (One or two peers would suggest that > you are still running build 1195.) > > Peter. > > Niels Egberts wrote: > > Mine would not auto-upgrade either (I waited for about 15 minutes, 1195 > > downloaded within a few minutes). Then I ran update.sh, which went > without > > trouble execpt for the fact that the node did not restart by itself, I > had > > to kill it. > > > > Now I'm connected to 1 opennet peer. > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM, SmallSister development < > > smallsister at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > >> Apparently build 1196 has been pushed out; the common "A new stable > >> version of Freenet is available" message box has appeared on the message > >> list. > >> > >> Unfortunately the "Update Now" button in the box only brings me to the > >> proxy home page and does not seem to do anything but bringing me to the > >> freenet proxy home page. > >> > >> Peter. > >> > >> I have to try the update.sh trick... will do soon > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/c616b04e/attachment.html>
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1196 and current status
Freenet 0.7 build 1196 is now available, and is mandatory. It should be downloaded by your node automatically. Please upgrade. We are still working on the request latency optimisations that we started on Saturday. We have discovered that the median time taken by a typical CHK request is vastly lower than the mean time taken by one, because every so often a data transfer takes a long time (many minutes in some cases). In this build we have extended the transfer backoff system to try to isolate nodes causing this trouble. Apologies for the continued disruption particularly to throughput, but if we can crack this one it should greatly improve latency and fproxy performance, hopefully permanently. Thanks for testing Freenet! Freenet remains an unfinished and in-progress system, and sometimes the best way to move things forward is to try things out on the live network ... None of the recent changes have in any way jeopardised anonymity as far as I know. This build also includes a fix for a NullPointerException introduced in the stalled request detection code in 1195, which was largely harmless, and a tweak to some code used by some plugins. Upgrade! Let us know if you fail to upgrade or notice any bugs... -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/84bfa0aa/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] What did you do to the Update Now button in 1195?
Apparently build 1196 has been pushed out; the common A new stable version of Freenet is available message box has appeared on the message list. Unfortunately the Update Now button in the box only brings me to the proxy home page and does not seem to do anything but bringing me to the freenet proxy home page. Peter. I have to try the update.sh trick... will do soon ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] What did you do to the Update Now button in 1195?
For me the manual ugrade with update.sh went smoothly and I am fully connected (20 strangers) again on build 1196. Are you sure you are on build 1196? (One or two peers would suggest that you are still running build 1195.) Peter. Niels Egberts wrote: Mine would not auto-upgrade either (I waited for about 15 minutes, 1195 downloaded within a few minutes). Then I ran update.sh, which went without trouble execpt for the fact that the node did not restart by itself, I had to kill it. Now I'm connected to 1 opennet peer. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: Apparently build 1196 has been pushed out; the common A new stable version of Freenet is available message box has appeared on the message list. Unfortunately the Update Now button in the box only brings me to the proxy home page and does not seem to do anything but bringing me to the freenet proxy home page. Peter. I have to try the update.sh trick... will do soon ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] What did you do to the Update Now button in 1195?
Yeah, after about 10 minutes more peers came and now I'm also back to 20 :-) On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: For me the manual ugrade with update.sh went smoothly and I am fully connected (20 strangers) again on build 1196. Are you sure you are on build 1196? (One or two peers would suggest that you are still running build 1195.) Peter. Niels Egberts wrote: Mine would not auto-upgrade either (I waited for about 15 minutes, 1195 downloaded within a few minutes). Then I ran update.sh, which went without trouble execpt for the fact that the node did not restart by itself, I had to kill it. Now I'm connected to 1 opennet peer. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: Apparently build 1196 has been pushed out; the common A new stable version of Freenet is available message box has appeared on the message list. Unfortunately the Update Now button in the box only brings me to the proxy home page and does not seem to do anything but bringing me to the freenet proxy home page. Peter. I have to try the update.sh trick... will do soon ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! Peer backoff reasons * FatalTimeout 1 * ForwardRejectedOverload 10 * InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 1 * Took too long (still running) 7 * TransferFailedInsert 1 A moment later : Peer backoff reasons * FatalTimeout 1 * ForwardRejectedOverload 9 * InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 2 * Took too long (still running) 5 * TransferFailedInsert 1 * TransferFailedRequest5 1 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my computer (in opennet only)? (mDNS protocol) Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local Type: SRV (Service location) .000 0001 = Class: IN (0x0001) 0... = Cache flush: False Time to live: X hour Data length: X Priority: X Weight: X Port: MY DARKNET PORT Target: MY COMPUTER NAME ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my computer (in opennet only)? It is sent to your LAN to make it easier to use FCP clients on computers other than the one you installed Freenet onto. (mDNS protocol) Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local Type: SRV (Service location) .000 0001 = Class: IN (0x0001) 0... = Cache flush: False Time to live: X hour Data length: X Priority: X Weight: X Port: MY DARKNET PORT Target: MY COMPUTER NAME pgpGenOb9nXU9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] some translation in french
Applied in SVN r25051. Will be in the next build. Thanks! Please send translation updates to the devl list next time. pgpKJzUtqHO5v.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] commandline modify config
On Sunday 11 January 2009 17:18, anonymous freenet wrote: hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows. reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big big? is like 5k upload only. sorry if you is receive this times two, i send before but no see. Best way to do this is probably to make a script that talks FCP and sets the config option. http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetFCPSpec2Point0 also do you is no you got no archive any more here http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/. you is need to go here http://archives.freenetproject.org/list/support.en.html. but this page http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support is still tell you go old page. thanks to all people. pgpN1bPhUaqCe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. Everything is preemptively rejected, due to Transfer speed (output). ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. Everything is preemptively rejected, due to Transfer speed (output). I thought you said (on IRC) that you weren't connected anywhere because you didn't update? pgpQJANCIuihT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. Everything is preemptively rejected, due to Transfer speed (output). I thought you said (on IRC) that you weren't connected anywhere because you didn't update? That was with 1195. With 1196 I do seem able to connect. Currently on opennet, for example, I am connected to 9, and disconnected from 9. The strangers stat's page shows some data flowing between my peers, 0% overload probability, %Time routable ~99.9% for the connected nodes, and 100% for the disconnected nodes :P. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1197
Freenet 0.7 build 1197 is now available, and is mandatory at midnight. Please upgrade. Nodes with auto-deploy-update disabled may have problems, since in 1195 a bug was introduced which broke the Update Now button, which is fixed in 1197. If you are in this situation please either update manually with update.sh/update.cmd, or turn on Automatically install new versions in the updater category (you can turn it back off once the node is running 1197). Apart from that bugfix and related ones, and a small French update from regivanx, I have reverted the recent changes related to long transfer times. Freenet should recover and use as much bandwidth as it was using before now. If you have adjusted your bandwidth limit to compensate for the problems, please change it back. However, this is not the end of the story - it is likely that 1198 will have some changes aimed at eliminating really slow request transfers, but hopefully these changes will be less disruptive. Thanks. pgpmEbgUqoxoC.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security
2009/1/13 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i 3buib3s...@gmail.com: Ok, so this packet isn't forward to WAN by the router? Target: MY COMPUTER NAME your computer is the target, so it seems not to do anything else but stay home. Your IP got translated to your computer name by your sniffer and is most certainly not in the packet itself. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
