Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'could this project be able to help rebui…'

2011-11-10 Thread DavidBombeRoden
Hi Dennis,

   could this project be able to help rebuild the internet in the
   advent of a society breakdown or in an apocylypse
  No.
 I think the question only asked if it *could help* -- not if Freenet
 alone would /necessarily/ achieve anything.

It can not help to _rebuild_ the internet because it _requires_ the internet. 
Simple as that. :)


Greetings,

David

-- 
David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-21 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On WOCHENTAG, tT. MONAT  23:21:53 Dennis Nezic wrote:

 And, I still don't quite understand why you can't check the status of a
 socket, or be notified of wget's FIN signal (It did send one, didn't
 it, or am I missing something?) -- isn't that fundamental to any tcp
 connection??

As Matthew already told you, finding out whether a socket has been disconnected 
can only be done by reading from or writing to the socket. We don’t do either 
until the request is finished. There’s your answer and it won’t change if you 
ask more often.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Building of Freenet stops at testing step

2011-04-09 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Friday 08 April 2011 17:40:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:

 Get a stack trace. Either attach a debugger or press ctrl+c (or was it
 ctrl+break? not sure on windows) while it is stalled.

Ctrl+Break in the console window on Windows, kill -QUIT on Linux/BSD/OS X.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] FCP information

2011-03-26 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Saturday 26 March 2011 20:52:41 CyberLeo wrote:

 Since the fetching and decoding are now handled by the node instead of
 the client, and the most detailed information offered by the
 SimpleProgress stanza is a blind block count, is there an easy way via
 the FCP to obtain a bitmap of unfetched/fetched/failed/fatal blocks for
 a given download or upload, so that such a progress bar can be
 constructed clientside?

No, that information is not exported via FCP. Due to Freenet 0.7’s multilevel 
splitfile encoding process it would also be quite difficult to display the 
same information that Freenet 0.5 gave you.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] jFCPlib : highlevel interface ?

2011-03-11 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Thursday 10 March 2011 09:04:38 Jean-Francois Romang wrote:

 I'm discovering freenet and trying to control a node using FCP in Java. I
 downloaded jFCPlib, but the highlevel interface
 (net.pterodactylus.fcp.highlevel.*) seems unfinished (ie no way to put or
 get some data) : do I miss something ?

Unfortunately not. FcpClient has a getURI method that will retrieve a single 
URI without many bells and whistles but the rest of the API was written on an 
I-need-it-now basis and never progressed further than what you see.

The method getConnection will return the underlying FcpConnection, though. 
This offers you the (more or less) full range of client commands available.


 Jeff

David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Saturday 26 February 2011 01:01:34 Dennis Nezic wrote:

  USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z
  3WQCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/
 I can't access this freesite. Despite hours of trying. (Other freesites
 seem to work fine.)

That’s because an edition hint of -1 will never look for edition 0.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:

 The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes.

On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for 
smaller communities to run Freenet in order to keep a “clean” network (by 
whatever standards).


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] msdnsdiscovery

2011-02-25 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Friday 25 February 2011 21:45:26 folkert wrote:

 I wonder why is msdnsdiscovery announcing itself on 192.168.64.1/24:

My guess is that the plugin does not know too much about Freenet’s 
configuration and simply announces on the first interface it can find. For 
more details, read the source. :)


 Folkert van Heusden

David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] jFCPlib jar?

2011-02-12 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Sunday 12 December 2010 21:44:28 Robert Foss wrote:

 Where can I find a compiled version of the jFCPlib jar?

Nowhere, I’m afraid. At least I don’t offer any precompiled versions. You have 
to build it yourself.


 thanks :)

No problem. :)

David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] jFCPlib jar?

2011-02-12 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Sunday 13 February 2011 02:03:20 Roland Haeder wrote:

 I would bet he is not a user. Please take a look at the date he sent it.

I am well aware that the mail is two months old.


 Please also remember that Frost has similar legit-looking messages but
 they are spam.
 
 I could be wrong, but does mail really take so long? :)

Only when toad forgets to moderate this lists for two months—which is what 
happened here. No evil stuff happening, please move along. ;)


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-20 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Thursday 20 January 2011 18:24:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:

 Fix!

Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to do that.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-20 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Thursday 20 January 2011 20:32:30 Dennis Nezic wrote:

   Fix!
  Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to
  do that.
 Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a thing
 as 'c-o-n-t-e-x-t', eh?) (Perhaps acquire a sense of humor while you're
 at it.)

The context here would be three messages in which you are ranting about how 
Freenet does not manage to do a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting and how 
it sucks and get worse all the time, ending all messages with the command 
“Fix!”. And though I can assure you that nothing is wrong with my humor, I 
fail to see anything funny in behaving like you specifically were the person 
Freenet has been developed for.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Build 1321 doesn't respect my bandwidth limits

2011-01-10 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Monday 10 January 2011 17:13:17 Dennis Nezic wrote:

 Fix!

With /that/ tone you should be prepared to offer money for fixing it; 
otherwise shut up.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Something is wrong with my java.net code?

2010-11-02 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 04:14:18 Dennis Nezic wrote:

 What's going on with the networking code?

Very normal behaviour. Most threads are waiting in ServerSocket.accept() which 
is expected as those threads are waiting for somebody to connect. You have a 
NetworkInterface (for fproxy), a UdpSocketHandler (for FNP), an SMTP server 
and an IMAP server (sounds like Freemail), and an existing FCP connection that 
is waiting to receive data (from Frost or FMS, possibly).

Thank you for reporting allegedly suspicious behaviour—this repost is 
completely bogus, though. :)


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?

2010-10-16 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Saturday 16 October 2010 10:58:30 Dennis Nezic wrote:

 Oh, right, it is also very insecure. I'm not sure what incognito mode
 is, and believe it or not, not everyone uses Firefox or Chrome, but
 won't JavaScript still leak information like a drunk widow? (Ie. your
 browser, display resolution, and other potentially de-anonymizing
 stuff?) Sure, FProxy will try to filter scripts, but having (ugly)
 gaping holes lying around doesn't comfort me. (Although, even if
 (the various?) JavaScript implementations were made more
 anonymous-friendly, and even if they were made to work with less than
 100% cpu, it's still just plain ugly / script-unfriendly / etc.)

You obviously have not understood what we are actually talking about. We are 
NOT planning to allow freesites to execute arbitrary JavaScript. (And I had 
thought that would have been clear.)

We are talking about the Freenet web interface being spiced up with JavaScript 
to increase usability. Freesites will keep being denied any JavaScript, as 
usual.


David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] jSite trouble

2010-01-26 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 13:26:51 Marco A. Calamari wrote:

 I'm using jSite to insert an already inserted freesite;
 I was unable to find how define and change what files
 are included in a container (from the interface).

That’s because it is disabled. (I feel like I have written this before.)


 It will be useful also to see some sort of log about successful/
 failed insert, and to force the insertion of a site also if
 some files failed to insert.

jSite does not insert single files. The complete insert is one large blob of 
data, it either fails or succeeds. Logging could be done, though.


 I was unable to find any docs about jSite other than
 generic user guide; anyone can give help or point me to
 some docs?

jSite does have its own homepage:

u...@e3myofyp5avg6wyn16imhri6j7nj8980fm~aqe4ex1u,QvbWT0ImE0TwLODTl7EoJx2NBnwDxTbLTE6zkB-
eGPs,AQACAAE/jSite/7/

There is a documentation page which is not yet complete but still more 
complete than anything you can currently find on Freenet.


 Thanks.   Marco

David


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] (correction) hang on install

2007-10-27 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:43 -0400, Michael R. Hines wrote:
> I fixed it my self by removing internationalization call from the faulting 
> line.

The l10n call never was the problem, that call was missing the name of
the HTML node (which should have been "#"). Fixed in more recent
versions, sorry for the late reply. :)


David

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: 



[freenet-support] hang on install

2007-10-10 Thread DavidBombeRoden
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 13:19 -0400, Michael R. Hines wrote:

> java.lang.AssertionError
> at freenet.support.HTMLNode.(HTMLNode.java:46)
> at freenet.support.HTMLNode.(HTMLNode.java:31)
> at freenet.support.HTMLNode.(HTMLNode.java:58)

Fixed in r15442.

I really wonder why nobody noticed that before. Maybe you're the only
one running freenet with assertions enabled. :)


Bombe
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: 



[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-31 Thread David 'Bombe' Roden
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 23:47, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:

> Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was
> shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I
> don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for
> freenetbut it might be worth looking in to.

That would involve platform-specific code, there's no way to do that in 
java.


David
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 



[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-31 Thread David 'Bombe' Roden
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:35, inverse wrote:

> beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's
> homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be
> filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this is
> exactly what's happening in China.

Yes, the session bytes that are used to initiate connections are 
typical.


> Public-key encrypted communications show constant patterns the moment
> a public key is exchanged between hosts.

Communication between 0.7 nodes doesn't have to exchange public keys, 
those are already known as they are contained in the node reference.


David
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 



Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread David 'Bombe' Roden
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:35, inverse wrote:

 beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's
 homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be
 filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this is
 exactly what's happening in China.

Yes, the session bytes that are used to initiate connections are 
typical.


 Public-key encrypted communications show constant patterns the moment
 a public key is exchanged between hosts.

Communication between 0.7 nodes doesn't have to exchange public keys, 
those are already known as they are contained in the node reference.


David


pgp3I7rk5J72S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread David 'Bombe' Roden
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 23:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was
 shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I
 don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for
 freenetbut it might be worth looking in to.

That would involve platform-specific code, there's no way to do that in 
java.


David


pgpjzwSgsXhpB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-24 Thread David 'Bombe' Roden
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, an ominous cow herd wrote:

> My question, which has yet to be answered, is why did the Freenet
> project break with the previous release model and start directing new
> users to the unstable alpha 0.7 release?

Because Freenet 0.5 and Freenet 0.7 are two separate applications. They 
are _not_ different branches of the same application.


David
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: