[freenet-support] NPE in http://localhost:8888/servlet/nodestatus/inboundRequests.txt with build 60158
15.7.2004 12:46:37 (freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread, YThread-29, ERROR): Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job [EMAIL PROTECTED] java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.client.http.NodeStatusServlet.sendPerHostStats(NodeStatusServlet.java:2074) at freenet.client.http.NodeStatusServlet.doGet(NodeStatusServlet.java:193) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(Unknown Source) at freenet.interfaces.servlet.ServletContainer.handle(ServletContainer.java:82) at freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterface$ConnectionShell.run(LocalNIOInterface.java:268) at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285) -- Mika Hirvonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ Get Freenet from: http://cs181027153.pp.htv.fi:8891/J0~0J7ajDJE/ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:54:35 + (UTC) From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ...The government in New Zealand has decided that 256/256 is the highest broadband speed that our telecom monomoply needs to make available to competitors. :-( ...128/128 is the fastest connection available domestically without a monthly bandwidth cap... Wow Wayne! What a nightmarish situation. Bandwidth capping? 128/128? You guys need to do some serious political work in order to get rid of that monopoly. We had a similar situation here (Denmark), but luckily the telecom monopoly was removed in the mid nineties before the internet took off for real. Btw. cant you get internet feed from cable- and/or electricity-companies as well? That would create some competition. Regards, J ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations
On 16/07/2004, at 7:52 AM, Garb wrote: Message: 3 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:54:35 + (UTC) From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ...The government in New Zealand has decided that 256/256 is the highest broadband speed that our telecom monomoply needs to make available to competitors. :-( ...128/128 is the fastest connection available domestically without a monthly bandwidth cap... Wow Wayne! What a nightmarish situation. Bandwidth capping? 128/128? You guys need to do some serious political work in order to get rid of that monopoly. We had a similar situation here (Denmark), but luckily the telecom monopoly was removed in the mid nineties before the internet took off for real. Btw. cant you get internet feed from cable- and/or electricity-companies as well? That would create some competition. There is no legal monopoly in New Zealand. The marketplace is completely deregulated. There are no legal entry barriers to the market place and very few barriers to become a network operator (benefits like compulsory land access, instant fines for cable breakage...). The monopoly is because of the population distribution - nobody other than Telecom is willing to have wires to most of the population, it costs a lot for little return. The only reason Telecom will put up with it is because the wires were put in place by the government. That said, there's a group of students (including myself ;) at Victoria University who're planning to roll out a large scale IP network based on Cat-5e cable and Power over Ethernet. We've already solved most of the problems ;) Visit http://www.nzwired.net/ if you're interested. The company will be non-profit. -- Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sitharus.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Freenet cause my winXP box to die
My setup: Athlon XP 2600 + Barton @2.20 Ghz 512 Ram (192 Java) Winxp sp1 plus all updates Data store was 16 GB but is now less than 1 GB (long story but basically I thought maybe the large data store was causing the freeze up so I deleted it and started over.) Sun Java RTE 1.4.2 (3,4 and 5) same problem with all versions running stable 5084 Hi fellow freenetters. I have had a serious setback for the past couple weeks. About 2 weeks ago was the first time I had this problem..the problem is that freenet (or perhaps java,,not sure) began to freeze up my xp box. Not rock solid, but I was unable to shut down freenet with the systray icon. In fact once I was "frozen" I was unable to open any programs or close any that were already open and would have to hit my reset button to restart. At first I thought it was my mozilla browser because it would freeze after I opened it to see the gateway or stats pages. This would happen within minutes of starting my node. Then I found that even if my node ran for an hour without opening my browser that I would still be frozen. I use DUmeter to monitor my up and downstreams. It seems the connection would choke out after a few minutes?? wtf is going on? I have not changed anything on my end except updates at windows update. ? Since it first happened a couple weeks ago I have completely redone my system. Fresh format, clean install of windows. Clean install of freenet and I am having exactly the same problem. I seem to recall someone else a few months back complaining of a similar problem but I have as yet been unable to find a reference in the archives. Frost runs fine. Fuqid otoh does not. When I try to "abort all tasks" fuqid hangs. But the freeze ups happen when I am not running any freenet apps so I don't think fuqid is the problem. What about the fact that I have my drives encrypted with dcpp. Would that affect freenet operation? Is there possibly a conflict with the dcpp driver? Now I am grasping at straws because I ran my system encrypted for several weeks before the problems started. damn, I hate computers sometimes. They sure have a knack of humbling one :) I welcome any suggestions because as it stands now I am unable to run my node at all and unless I can figure out what's going on I will have to ditch the freenet project completely and that would be a shame. thanks for any and all suggestions. regards, Gar ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
