[pfSense Support] helo there

2007-04-20 Thread Arthur Mitchell
Hi my name is Arthur and i have a problem setting up my pfsense pptp server i 
get it working but i want clients to acces my network and if been struggeling 
for three weeks so how do i foward my server's add to a local lan add to open a 
windows file server?

[pfSense Support] R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

2007-04-20 Thread Quirino Santilli
Furthermore, looking at the routing table the WanMonitorIpAddress and the 
Wan2MonitorIpAddress share the same gateway, the default gateway.
I think that it's not a visualization problem, It really doesn't fetch the 
interfaces when adding a Load Balancer Pool.

10x in advance.

r3N0oV4



-Messaggio originale-
Da: Quirino Santilli 
Inviato: venerdì 20 aprile 2007 10.15
A: 'support@pfsense.com'
Oggetto: R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

Ok, I updated and the issue solved, but now when adding a Load Balancer Pool in 
the list field I see something strange: on my howto the list format is 
WAN|(WanMonitorIpAddress) and WAN2|(Wan2MonitorIpAddress). On my firewall 
installation the results are different, the list field is in that format: 
|(WanMonitorIpAddress) and |(Wan2MonitorIpAddress).
It seems like that the Interfaces in the resulting config is missing. Even when 
I look at the load balancer's list the Server/Gateway field is empty and the 
monitor field has no corresponding interface.

Is it a configuration problem?

10x

r3N0oV4


-Messaggio originale-
Da: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: giovedì 19 aprile 2007 19.35
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

On 4/19/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was finally configuring pfSense as a multi-wan / load-balancing /
 fail-over firewall for my company when i found something strange.

 Looking at the howto at this address
 http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing i
 found that the load-balancer had a behaviour field that in my 1.0.1
 installation is not available. To make you believe I'm not fooling, you can
 find attached the interface that comes out in my installation and the one
 available on the howto.



 Can you tell me why?

Upgrade to a recent snapshot.

http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

2007-04-20 Thread Quirino Santilli
Ok, I updated and the issue solved, but now when adding a Load Balancer Pool in 
the list field I see something strange: on my howto the list format is 
WAN|(WanMonitorIpAddress) and WAN2|(Wan2MonitorIpAddress). On my firewall 
installation the results are different, the list field is in that format: 
|(WanMonitorIpAddress) and |(Wan2MonitorIpAddress).
It seems like that the Interfaces in the resulting config is missing. Even when 
I look at the load balancer's list the Server/Gateway field is empty and the 
monitor field has no corresponding interface.

Is it a configuration problem?

10x

r3N0oV4


-Messaggio originale-
Da: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: giovedì 19 aprile 2007 19.35
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

On 4/19/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was finally configuring pfSense as a multi-wan / load-balancing /
 fail-over firewall for my company when i found something strange.

 Looking at the howto at this address
 http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing i
 found that the load-balancer had a behaviour field that in my 1.0.1
 installation is not available. To make you believe I'm not fooling, you can
 find attached the interface that comes out in my installation and the one
 available on the howto.



 Can you tell me why?

Upgrade to a recent snapshot.

http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] problem upgrading version 1.0 - wrong signatures in dowloaded iso.tgz

2007-04-20 Thread Antonio Rossi

Dear Sirs,

I'd like to upgrade from version 1.0 to 1.01 using the web interface
System:Firmware:Manual Update, but when I upload the file 
pfSense-1.0.1-LiveCD-Installer.iso.gz (taken from various mirror) always
get the error message of  wrong signature.

It this correct?

--
Antonio Rossi


[pfSense Support] Can't boot from last Embedded Snapshot

2007-04-20 Thread Josep Pujadas i Jubany
Hello!

My steps:

1.- A new CF card (in order to minimize my out-of-service time)
2.- Download 
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/embedded/pfSense.img.gz
3.- gunzip pfSense.img.gz
4.- Replace config.xml at pfSense.img (with my last config.xml saved) using 
replace_conf.sh from http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1998.0.html
5.- Resize pfSense.img to 1024 MByte (for my new CF) using mkflash_new.sh 
http://pfsense.org/cgi-
bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/tools/builder_scripts/mkflash_new.sh?
rev=1.1;content-type=application%2Fx-sh
6.- Write pfSense-1024MB.img.gz to my new CF.
7.- Shutdown / Turn Off / Extract Old CF / Put New CF / Turn On

I can't boot. My box sees the CF card as ad2. Is a FabiaTech FX5620 from 
http://linitx.com/product_info.php?cPath=4products_id=909

Is it possible that Embedded image only works for ad0 ? If yes, how to change 
it before writting my CF ?

I need to change to the last Snapshot for VPN stability, please help!

Thanks,

Josep Pujadas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Can't boot from last Embedded Snapshot

2007-04-20 Thread Ryan Wagoner
You don't need to resize the flash image to match your cf card. The
replace_conf.sh script I wrote and I use it all the time with snapshots.
You might try just writing the snapshot image to your cf card and
booting it without all the extras to see if it works. Then add back in
your config, test, then resize the image if you still want to. 

-Original Message-
From: Josep Pujadas i Jubany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:50 AM
To: pfSense
Subject: [pfSense Support] Can't boot from last Embedded Snapshot

Hello!

My steps:

1.- A new CF card (in order to minimize my out-of-service time)
2.- Download
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/embedded/pfSense.img.gz
3.- gunzip pfSense.img.gz
4.- Replace config.xml at pfSense.img (with my last config.xml saved)
using replace_conf.sh from
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1998.0.html
5.- Resize pfSense.img to 1024 MByte (for my new CF) using
mkflash_new.sh
http://pfsense.org/cgi-
bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/tools/builder_scripts/mkflash_new.sh?
rev=1.1;content-type=application%2Fx-sh
6.- Write pfSense-1024MB.img.gz to my new CF.
7.- Shutdown / Turn Off / Extract Old CF / Put New CF / Turn On

I can't boot. My box sees the CF card as ad2. Is a FabiaTech FX5620 from
http://linitx.com/product_info.php?cPath=4products_id=909

Is it possible that Embedded image only works for ad0 ? If yes, how to
change it before writting my CF ?

I need to change to the last Snapshot for VPN stability, please help!

Thanks,

Josep Pujadas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] helo there

2007-04-20 Thread Chris Buechler

Arthur Mitchell wrote:
Hi my name is Arthur and i have a problem setting up my pfsense pptp 
server i get it working but i want clients to acces my network and if 
been struggeling for three weeks so how do i foward my server's add to 
a local lan add to open a windows file server?


Do you have an allow rule on the PPTP interface?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] problem upgrading version 1.0 - wrong signatures in dowloaded iso.tgz

2007-04-20 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
that's because its the wrong file. that's the ISO image for burning the 
installer to CD.
you want pfSense-Full-Update-1.0.1.tgz or one of the snapshots.
 
-Sean


Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:10:17 +0200From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: [pfSense Support] problem upgrading version 1.0 - wrong signatures 
in dowloaded iso.tgzDear Sirs,I'd like to upgrade from version 1.0 to 1.01 
using the web interface System:Firmware:Manual Update, but when I upload the 
file pfSense-1.0.1-LiveCD-Installer.iso.gz (taken from various mirror) always 
get the error message of  wrong signature. It this correct?-- Antonio Rossi
_
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx

RE: [pfSense Support] helo there

2007-04-20 Thread Tim Dickson
Also, keep your PPTP addresses in the same subnet as your file server.
If you don't, you'll have to go into some advanced routing...
-Tim

-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:33 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] helo there

Arthur Mitchell wrote:
 Hi my name is Arthur and i have a problem setting up my pfsense pptp 
 server i get it working but i want clients to acces my network and if 
 been struggeling for three weeks so how do i foward my server's add to

 a local lan add to open a windows file server?

Do you have an allow rule on the PPTP interface?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

2007-04-20 Thread Scott Ullrich

Remove the members of the pool and re-add them.

Scott


On 4/20/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Furthermore, looking at the routing table the WanMonitorIpAddress and the 
Wan2MonitorIpAddress share the same gateway, the default gateway.
I think that it's not a visualization problem, It really doesn't fetch the 
interfaces when adding a Load Balancer Pool.

10x in advance.

r3N0oV4



-Messaggio originale-
Da: Quirino Santilli
Inviato: venerdì 20 aprile 2007 10.15
A: 'support@pfsense.com'
Oggetto: R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

Ok, I updated and the issue solved, but now when adding a Load Balancer Pool in the list field I see something 
strange: on my howto the list format is WAN|(WanMonitorIpAddress) and WAN2|(Wan2MonitorIpAddress). On my 
firewall installation the results are different, the list field is in that format: |(WanMonitorIpAddress) and 
|(Wan2MonitorIpAddress).
It seems like that the Interfaces in the resulting config is missing. Even when I look at 
the load balancer's list the Server/Gateway field is empty and the monitor 
field has no corresponding interface.

Is it a configuration problem?

10x

r3N0oV4


-Messaggio originale-
Da: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: giovedì 19 aprile 2007 19.35
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?

On 4/19/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was finally configuring pfSense as a multi-wan / load-balancing /
 fail-over firewall for my company when i found something strange.

 Looking at the howto at this address
 http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing i
 found that the load-balancer had a behaviour field that in my 1.0.1
 installation is not available. To make you believe I'm not fooling, you can
 find attached the interface that comes out in my installation and the one
 available on the howto.



 Can you tell me why?

Upgrade to a recent snapshot.

http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]