Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
Hi Scott and all,
I don't experience Squid dying in pfsense yet. But, I
did experience this in the past when Squid core dumps
in my custom FreeBSD box.
The possibility of Squid dying or terminating (for
whatever reason) is not remote and with the rdr rules
for transparent proxying still in effect, this could
effectively block http traffic.
A solution could be to use a script (See the RunCache
script for squid as reference) to periodically check
if squid is still running and when it's not, the
script should set the filter dirty flag to reload the
filters.
With this solution, the /etc/inc/filter.inc should
also be modified to allow removal of the rdr rule for
transparent proxying only when squid has died or
terminated.
...
if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1)
if(is_process_running(squid)) {
//insert rule for transp proxy
}
else {
//remove rdr rule for transp proxy
}
...
I hope this makes my point clear.
Miles
--- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SQUID should not be dying. If it is then I need to
deactivate the
package until a new one is released on the freebsd
site.
Scott
On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No need to file a ticket. Thanks for the swift
action.
I'll wait till next release then.
Also, I am concerned of the Squid process dying
for
any reason and the rdr rule for transparent
proxying
is still in effect. This will block http traffic
to
the internet. Any solution for this?
Thanks again.
Miles
--- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The solution here is to set the filter dirty
flag in
the squid startup
script. This will force the rules to be
reloaded
and then squid will
be running.
I'll take care of it shortly.
Scott
On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albert, can you file a ticket on this at
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ?
I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up,
but I
suppose that's open
for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm
wondering if we're even
starting up squid before the filter.
Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the
is_process_running
statement and tell us how long you have to
sleep
for to get reliable
results? Also, what speed hardware is this on?
Thanks
--Bill
On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think it is actually a BUG in the script
/etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the
squid
process
at boot time which will return FALSE because
no
package is loaded during this time yet. See
the
/etc/rc script for the loading sequence.
The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes
the
pf
rules is called before executing rc.d items.
Please
see the /etc/rc script.
As a solution, the
if(is_process_running(squid))
at line no. 1134 of the file
/etc/inc/filter.inc
must
be commented out.
Cheers!
--- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When the squid package has installed
properly
without any errors type:
# pfctl -sr | grep rdr
if that returns a rule and trans.proxy
still
doesn't
work (make sure
the squid process is running) then I would
suggest
you read the squid
logs to findout why it doesn't cache.
/bkw
On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent
proxy is
missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes
transparent
proxying NOT to function properly. The
corresponding
pass rules are present however.
The problem is corrected by commenting
out
line#
1134
of /etc/inc/filter.inc:
if
(is_package_installed(squid) ==
1)
//if
(is_process_running(squid))
Could it be because this function was
called
at
the
time when squid has not fully loaded
itself?
If
this
is the case, then it would be better if
the
rc
loader
for squid be given enough time to
sleep
for a
while
before exiting.
Thanks.
Miles
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best
spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
##
BKW - Bachman Kharazmi
bahkha AT gmail DOT com
uin:
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
SQUID should not be dying. If it is then I need to deactivate the package until a new one is released on the freebsd site. Scott On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No need to file a ticket. Thanks for the swift action. I'll wait till next release then. Also, I am concerned of the Squid process dying for any reason and the rdr rule for transparent proxying is still in effect. This will block http traffic to the internet. Any solution for this? Thanks again. Miles --- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will be running. I'll take care of it shortly. Scott On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert, can you file a ticket on this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ? I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up, but I suppose that's open for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm wondering if we're even starting up squid before the filter. Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the is_process_running statement and tell us how long you have to sleep for to get reliable results? Also, what speed hardware is this on? Thanks --Bill On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail DOT com uin: #24089491 SWEDEN ## - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
I've now tried squid. I works well for me running 0.76.4 The installation succeeds and the squid process starts in right order. The rdr rules 'DOES' exist in my rules.debug and has been enabled. I've read all squid logs and it does transperant caching out of the box. Now I'll leave the process running for a few hours while using inet and see what happens... /bkw On 8/17/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SQUID should not be dying. If it is then I need to deactivate the package until a new one is released on the freebsd site. Scott On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No need to file a ticket. Thanks for the swift action. I'll wait till next release then. Also, I am concerned of the Squid process dying for any reason and the rdr rule for transparent proxying is still in effect. This will block http traffic to the internet. Any solution for this? Thanks again. Miles --- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will be running. I'll take care of it shortly. Scott On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert, can you file a ticket on this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ? I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up, but I suppose that's open for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm wondering if we're even starting up squid before the filter. Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the is_process_running statement and tell us how long you have to sleep for to get reliable results? Also, what speed hardware is this on? Thanks --Bill On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail DOT com uin: #24089491 SWEDEN ## - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
BKW, Any chance of doing some type of automated web browsing from a machine and let it run overnight? IE: the client machine would keep randomly surfing to sites.. Scott On 8/17/05, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've now tried squid. I works well for me running 0.76.4 The installation succeeds and the squid process starts in right order. The rdr rules 'DOES' exist in my rules.debug and has been enabled. I've read all squid logs and it does transperant caching out of the box. Now I'll leave the process running for a few hours while using inet and see what happens... /bkw On 8/17/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SQUID should not be dying. If it is then I need to deactivate the package until a new one is released on the freebsd site. Scott On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No need to file a ticket. Thanks for the swift action. I'll wait till next release then. Also, I am concerned of the Squid process dying for any reason and the rdr rule for transparent proxying is still in effect. This will block http traffic to the internet. Any solution for this? Thanks again. Miles --- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will be running. I'll take care of it shortly. Scott On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert, can you file a ticket on this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ? I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up, but I suppose that's open for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm wondering if we're even starting up squid before the filter. Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the is_process_running statement and tell us how long you have to sleep for to get reliable results? Also, what speed hardware is this on? Thanks --Bill On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail DOT com uin: #24089491 SWEDEN ## - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
sounds fun and useful atm. I'll search and see what I can find, I'am pretty sure there are tools for that.. /bkw On 8/17/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BKW, Any chance of doing some type of automated web browsing from a machine and let it run overnight? IE: the client machine would keep randomly surfing to sites.. Scott On 8/17/05, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've now tried squid. I works well for me running 0.76.4 The installation succeeds and the squid process starts in right order. The rdr rules 'DOES' exist in my rules.debug and has been enabled. I've read all squid logs and it does transperant caching out of the box. Now I'll leave the process running for a few hours while using inet and see what happens... /bkw On 8/17/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SQUID should not be dying. If it is then I need to deactivate the package until a new one is released on the freebsd site. Scott On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No need to file a ticket. Thanks for the swift action. I'll wait till next release then. Also, I am concerned of the Squid process dying for any reason and the rdr rule for transparent proxying is still in effect. This will block http traffic to the internet. Any solution for this? Thanks again. Miles --- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will be running. I'll take care of it shortly. Scott On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert, can you file a ticket on this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ? I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up, but I suppose that's open for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm wondering if we're even starting up squid before the filter. Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the is_process_running statement and tell us how long you have to sleep for to get reliable results? Also, what speed hardware is this on? Thanks --Bill On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail DOT com uin: #24089491 SWEDEN ## - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will be running. I'll take care of it shortly. Scott On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert, can you file a ticket on this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ? I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up, but I suppose that's open for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm wondering if we're even starting up squid before the filter. Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the is_process_running statement and tell us how long you have to sleep for to get reliable results? Also, what speed hardware is this on? Thanks --Bill On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail DOT com uin: #24089491 SWEDEN ## - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 0.76.2: No rdr rule for Squid Transparent Proxy
No need to file a ticket. Thanks for the swift action. I'll wait till next release then. Also, I am concerned of the Squid process dying for any reason and the rdr rule for transparent proxying is still in effect. This will block http traffic to the internet. Any solution for this? Thanks again. Miles --- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will be running. I'll take care of it shortly. Scott On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert, can you file a ticket on this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/ ? I'd rather not delay boot until squid is up, but I suppose that's open for debate. Without looking at the code, I'm wondering if we're even starting up squid before the filter. Can you insert a sleep(); statement before the is_process_running statement and tell us how long you have to sleep for to get reliable results? Also, what speed hardware is this on? Thanks --Bill On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is actually a BUG in the script /etc/inc/filter.inc that checks for the squid process at boot time which will return FALSE because no package is loaded during this time yet. See the /etc/rc script for the loading sequence. The /etc/rc.bootup script that initializes the pf rules is called before executing rc.d items. Please see the /etc/rc script. As a solution, the if(is_process_running(squid)) at line no. 1134 of the file /etc/inc/filter.inc must be commented out. Cheers! --- Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the squid package has installed properly without any errors type: # pfctl -sr | grep rdr if that returns a rule and trans.proxy still doesn't work (make sure the squid process is running) then I would suggest you read the squid logs to findout why it doesn't cache. /bkw On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The rdr (nat) rule for squid transparent proxy is missing on pfsense 0.76.2 which causes transparent proxying NOT to function properly. The corresponding pass rules are present however. The problem is corrected by commenting out line# 1134 of /etc/inc/filter.inc: if (is_package_installed(squid) == 1) //if (is_process_running(squid)) Could it be because this function was called at the time when squid has not fully loaded itself? If this is the case, then it would be better if the rc loader for squid be given enough time to sleep for a while before exiting. Thanks. Miles __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## BKW - Bachman Kharazmi bahkha AT gmail DOT com uin: #24089491 SWEDEN ## - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
