Re: Foxit Reader problem

2008-12-15 Thread Ed Mullen

ST wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

ST wrote:

Hello,

I uninstalled Acrobat and installed Foxit reader.  It works fine as a 
separate program to view PDF files, but there is a problem if I click

on a pdf file from a Seamonkey window.

It starts to download, but then freezes.  A popup will come up with a 
'Server Busy' heading. The message says: The application cannot be 
completed because [file name] (application/pdf object) Seamonkey 
program is not responding.


Then there are two boxes below that can be clicked.  One says Switch 
[which when clicked does nothing] and the other says Retry.  If Retry 
is clicked, it goes away for a few seconds then the original popup 
comes back. There is a Cancel button also, but that is grayed out.  I 
can't close the program after that without using the task manager. 
The task manager shows Foxit as being loaded, but if I kill that 
program I'm still frozen and have to kill Seamonkey also.


I tried adding Foxit to the helper applications but that did nothing.


Simply setting Foxit as the default file handler in Windows should be 
enough to automatically create the Helper Application listing in 
SeaMonkey.  FWIW, here are HA screens from my properly operating 
Foxit/SeaMonkey installation.


http://edmullen.net/temp/capfox1.jpg

If you click the Edit button on that screen you'll get this:

http://edmullen.net/temp/capfox2.jpg



Hello,

Those are my settings also.

ST


What version of Windows?
What version of Foxit?

Have you tried uninstalling Foxit and re-installing it?

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
How come abbreviated is such a long word?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: BUG in 1.1.13 version ?

2008-12-15 Thread Bertrand

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo a écrit :

Bertrand wrote:

The mail-adresses-file gestion had problems.
first : any adresses-lists from the previous version dosn't come in 
the message adresse when we give his name


I have no idea what you're trying to say with this.

I explan it in frensh below


second : when we create an new adresses-list in a profile, this news 
list is visible in the other profils (tools/change profil to get in 
an other profile).
I verify that the modification date from the aboot.mab isn't modify in 
the other profiles.

The new list in the others mail-adresses-file are then chimera, not real.
Excuse my english
Sincerly
Bertrand de Pommery


what happens when you switch profiles without using Tools? I mean 
switching profiles use the profile manager




Hello
Excuse for my so bad english, Peter
I write it in frensh :
Dans le carnet d'adresses a des problèmes de gestion :
premièrement : certaines listes d'adresses ne sont plus retrouvées en 
écrivant son nom dans les adresses de la rédaction d'un mail (écrit en 
rouge, comme inconnu)
deuxièmement : en créant une liste dans un de mes profils (j'en ai 4), 
je l'ai retrouvée dans deux autres (je n'ai pas regardé le dernier). 
Mais après fermeture de Seamonkey, j'ai constaté que les fichiers 
abook.mab n'avaient pas changé de date de modification hormis celui du 
profil où j'avais créé la liste, bien sur. Dans cette expérimentation, 
je n'ai pas fermé Seamonkey mais je suis passé d'un profil à l'autre par 
le menu outils/changer de profil qui ouvre le gestionnaire de profil 
(profile manager). C'était donc une liste fantôme dans les autres profils.
En repassant en 1.1.12, les carnets d'adresses sont redevenus corrects, 
sans la liste fantôme. Ce qui était normal au vu des dates de modification.


Cordialement
Bertrand
Is anyone can translate this text for the people not reading the frensh 
language, my english is so bad...

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Foxit Reader problem

2008-12-15 Thread Bertrand

ST a écrit :

Hello,

I uninstalled Acrobat and installed Foxit reader.  It works fine as a 
separate program to view PDF files, but there is a problem if I click

on a pdf file from a Seamonkey window.

It starts to download, but then freezes.  A popup will come up with a 
'Server Busy' heading. The message says: The application cannot be 
completed because [file name] (application/pdf object) Seamonkey program 
is not responding.


Then there are two boxes below that can be clicked.  One says Switch 
[which when clicked does nothing] and the other says Retry.  If Retry is 
clicked, it goes away for a few seconds then the original popup comes 
back. There is a Cancel button also, but that is grayed out.  I can't 
close the program after that without using the task manager. The task 
manager shows Foxit as being loaded, but if I kill that program I'm 
still frozen and have to kill Seamonkey also.


I tried adding Foxit to the helper applications but that did nothing.

Suggestions would be appreciated?

Thanks,

ST
I always have problem with Foxit with OS W98se, Me or XP. It say me that 
Foxit is perhapps better in version 3. I don't tray.

Bertrand
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Concerning Firefox and presumably SeaMonkey security

2008-12-15 Thread Robert Kaiser

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Robert Kaiser wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Mozilla's Firefox web browser versions 2 and 3 top the list with 40
reported flaws.


The real interesting part is how many users out there (absolute or
percentage) are using products with unfixed security flaws? How many
days of having no fix for a known security vulnerability did the
different products have?
It not important how many different flaws there were in any given
product,


Come again?? Not important how many flaws made it past all internal
quality controls and presumably beta testing into a released version
of the product?


There is no internal in open source. Everything is public. The open 
community is the testing and quality control, be it in testing or in 
code reviews. Every single line of the code is out there for everyone to 
look at, user, developer, white hat or black hat. And that's why we 
don't hide minor flaws that probably cannot be exploited, as companies 
with closed source like to do. We label everything we find in our own 
development that has been in a release as security relevant and publish 
at least a minor severity advisory once we release the updates that fix 
this flaw. Most of the issues you'll see in Mozilla software are 
actually first published by us, and together with a version that 
actually contains the fixes, and together with the source code that 
fixes it. How many others do things that way? You just cannot compare 
apples with oranges, sorry.



Non organizational users, i.e. without centralized upgrade,
are unlikely to upgrade promptly. Heck, even centers with
dedicated computer administration, are often behind on versions
and fixes.


So, what you're saying basically means that anyone using centralized 
upgrades voluntarily is insecure. Well, if they like being insecure, why 
do we care about their security at all?


Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: BUG in 1.1.13 version ?

2008-12-15 Thread John Doue

Bertrand wrote:

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo a écrit :

Bertrand wrote:

The mail-adresses-file gestion had problems.
first : any adresses-lists from the previous version dosn't come in 
the message adresse when we give his name


I have no idea what you're trying to say with this.

I explan it in frensh below


second : when we create an new adresses-list in a profile, this news 
list is visible in the other profils (tools/change profil to get in 
an other profile).
I verify that the modification date from the aboot.mab isn't modify 
in the other profiles.
The new list in the others mail-adresses-file are then chimera, not 
real.

Excuse my english
Sincerly
Bertrand de Pommery


what happens when you switch profiles without using Tools? I mean 
switching profiles use the profile manager




Hello
Excuse for my so bad english, Peter
I write it in frensh :
Dans le carnet d'adresses a des problèmes de gestion :
premièrement : certaines listes d'adresses ne sont plus retrouvées en 
écrivant son nom dans les adresses de la rédaction d'un mail (écrit en 
rouge, comme inconnu)
deuxièmement : en créant une liste dans un de mes profils (j'en ai 4), 
je l'ai retrouvée dans deux autres (je n'ai pas regardé le dernier). 
Mais après fermeture de Seamonkey, j'ai constaté que les fichiers 
abook.mab n'avaient pas changé de date de modification hormis celui du 
profil où j'avais créé la liste, bien sur. Dans cette expérimentation, 
je n'ai pas fermé Seamonkey mais je suis passé d'un profil à l'autre par 
le menu outils/changer de profil qui ouvre le gestionnaire de profil 
(profile manager). C'était donc une liste fantôme dans les autres profils.
En repassant en 1.1.12, les carnets d'adresses sont redevenus corrects, 
sans la liste fantôme. Ce qui était normal au vu des dates de modification.


Cordialement
Bertrand
Is anyone can translate this text for the people not reading the frensh 
language, my english is so bad...


Bertrand,

Tu n'as essayé cette manip en fermant SM 1.1.13 complétement puis en 
relançant?


--
John Doue
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: BUG in 1.1.13 version ?

2008-12-15 Thread John Doue

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

John Doue wrote:

John Doue wrote:

Bertrand wrote:

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo a écrit :

Bertrand wrote:

The mail-adresses-file gestion had problems.
first : any adresses-lists from the previous version dosn't come 
in the message adresse when we give his name


I have no idea what you're trying to say with this.

I explan it in frensh below


second : when we create an new adresses-list in a profile, this 
news list is visible in the other profils (tools/change profil 
to get in an other profile).
I verify that the modification date from the aboot.mab isn't 
modify in the other profiles.
The new list in the others mail-adresses-file are then chimera, 
not real.

Excuse my english
Sincerly
Bertrand de Pommery


what happens when you switch profiles without using Tools? I mean 
switching profiles use the profile manager




Hello
Excuse for my so bad english, Peter
I write it in frensh :
Dans le carnet d'adresses a des problèmes de gestion :
premièrement : certaines listes d'adresses ne sont plus retrouvées 
en écrivant son nom dans les adresses de la rédaction d'un mail 
(écrit en rouge, comme inconnu)
deuxièmement : en créant une liste dans un de mes profils (j'en ai 
4), je l'ai retrouvée dans deux autres (je n'ai pas regardé le 
dernier). Mais après fermeture de Seamonkey, j'ai constaté que les 
fichiers abook.mab n'avaient pas changé de date de modification 
hormis celui du profil où j'avais créé la liste, bien sur. Dans 
cette expérimentation, je n'ai pas fermé Seamonkey mais je suis 
passé d'un profil à l'autre par le menu outils/changer de profil 
qui ouvre le gestionnaire de profil (profile manager). C'était donc 
une liste fantôme dans les autres profils.
En repassant en 1.1.12, les carnets d'adresses sont redevenus 
corrects, sans la liste fantôme. Ce qui était normal au vu des dates 
de modification.


Cordialement
Bertrand
Is anyone can translate this text for the people not reading the 
frensh language, my english is so bad...


I will attempt to translate this - not literally -:
__
in the Address book, there are management problems.
firstly, addresses sometimes do not show up automatically while 
typing the first characters on an address in mail fields (added by 
me: like To, CC, and so on).


secondly, after creating a list in one of my profiles (I have 4 of 
them), I found it in two of the others (did not check the last one). 
But after closing SM, I find that the abook.mab files modification 
dates remained unchanged, except for the one in the profile where I 
created the list, of course. While doing this test, I did not shut 
down SM but switched profiles via the Menu Tools, Switch profiles. 
Seems to me it was a ghost list in the other profiles. Going back to 
1.1.12 corrected the issue, the ghost list disappeared. Which is 
normal given the modification dates.

__

The first issue seems clear to me, Peter.
The second, I understand a ghost addresses list appears in profiles 
different from the one a new list was created in. This appears to be 
the case using the Switching function. The OP does not seem to have 
tested this by shutting down SM and restarting it and he went back to 
1.1.12 which solved the problem.


Apparently, the OP went back to 1.1.12 immediately, without having 
tried shutting down and restarting 1.1.12, for fear of make the 
problem worse.




well, since I couldn't understand what was being said, I mentioned this 
in my first post, so I will mention it again.  When I use Tools, Switch 
Profile, sometimes things from the profile I'm in will show up in 
another.  That is why I said don't use Tools to switch profiles.  
Instead, close SM and start the SM profile manager, and switch profiles 
that way.



I kind of suspected this. T'as compris, Bertrand?

--
John Doue
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0a2 issues

2008-12-15 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500, /Ed Mullen/:


Just trying SM 2.0a2 and immediately noticed:

2.  In my userChrome.css file is the following:

/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item  .toolbarbutton-icon {
  display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */

which turns off the icons in the Personal Toolbar which, again, I really 
need in order to save space.  Been using this one for a long time too 
and it no longer works.  I wonder if the Personal Toolbar's name has 
been changed in the code which would account for this.


I think you just need the important keyword.  As far as I see using 
the DOM Inspector there's already another important style rule which 
affects the display property, so you surely need to add !important 
to your declaration.


--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0a2 issues

2008-12-15 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo

Ed Mullen wrote:


2.  In my userChrome.css file is the following:

/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item  .toolbarbutton-icon {
  display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */

which turns off the icons in the Personal Toolbar which, again, I really 
need in order to save space.  Been using this one for a long time too 
and it no longer works.  I wonder if the Personal Toolbar's name has 
been changed in the code which would account for this.


this is one of those new things in SM 2.  The entries 
for the personal toolbar has changed.


--
*IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email 
help Emails to me may become public


Notice: This posting is protected under the Free Speech 
Laws, which applies everywhere in the FREE world, 
except for some strange reason, not to the mozilla.org 
newsgroup servers, where your posting may get you banned.


Peter Potamus  His Magic Flying Balloon:
http://melaman2.com/cartoons/singles/mp3/p-potamus.mp3
http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Concerning Firefox and presumably SeaMonkey security

2008-12-15 Thread NoOp
On 12/13/2008 08:34 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

 Of note to everyone here is that Mozilla (SeaMonkey, Firefox etc.) 
 report EVERY security bug once fixed and what it was. Some companies 
 like IE, Apple, and possibly even Google (for chrome -- no data), if a 
 security bug is only ever found and reported internally, they won't make 
 it even known that it _ever_ existed. Where we do and fix it anyway. It 
 is a very open community, therefore the potential for others to 
 accurately gauge what bugs are fixed on our side is high, whereas on 
 Microsoft or Apple's side is relatively low.
 

Agree.

Along these lines, this might be of interest to try with SeaMonkey...

http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/
[Google Chrome Receives Lowest Password Security Score]
  http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/pm-evaluator/
[Password Manager Evaluator v2.0]

If I get some time later I'll try it with SM 1.1.14 and 2.0a3pre to see
what the results are.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Concerning Firefox and presumably SeaMonkey security

2008-12-15 Thread NoOp
On 12/15/2008 03:58 PM, John Boyle wrote:

   
 To ALL: There is a question that comes to my mind, as I see a SM 1.1.14
 is mentioned, but cannot find that anywhere. Is there really a version
 1.1.14 or is that a typo? :-[
 

Tomorrow, or at least within a few days hopefully. I'm using a
pre-released version. 1.1.13 is the currently released version.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0a2 issues

2008-12-15 Thread Robert Kaiser

Ed Mullen wrote:

2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:

/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item  .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */

which turns off the icons in the Personal Toolbar which, again, I really
need in order to save space. Been using this one for a long time too and
it no longer works. I wonder if the Personal Toolbar's name has been
changed in the code which would account for this.


Could you please file a bug that the personal toolbar doesn't respect 
the toolbar icon/test mode controls? I think that if you select the 
personal toolbar to be text-only, the personal toolbar items should 
follow that.


Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Concerning Firefox and presumably SeaMonkey security

2008-12-15 Thread Barry Edwin Gilmour

NoOp wrote:

On 12/15/2008 02:58 PM, NoOp wrote:
   

On 12/13/2008 08:34 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

 

Of note to everyone here is that Mozilla (SeaMonkey, Firefox etc.)
report EVERY security bug once fixed and what it was. Some companies
like IE, Apple, and possibly even Google (for chrome -- no data), if a
security bug is only ever found and reported internally, they won't make
it even known that it _ever_ existed. Where we do and fix it anyway. It
is a very open community, therefore the potential for others to
accurately gauge what bugs are fixed on our side is high, whereas on
Microsoft or Apple's side is relatively low.

   

Agree.

Along these lines, this might be of interest to try with SeaMonkey...

http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/
[Google Chrome Receives Lowest Password Security Score]
   http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/pm-evaluator/
[Password Manager Evaluator v2.0]

If I get some time later I'll try it with SM 1.1.14 and 2.0a3pre to see
what the results are.

 


1.1.14:
Report
Test Performed  Result
Action Authority Checked on Retrieval   FAILED
Action Authority Checked on SaveFAILED
Action Authority Raises WarningsFAILED
Action Path Checked on RetrievalFAILED
Action Path Checked on Save FAILED
Action Scheme Checked on Retrieval  FAILED
Action Scheme Checked on Save   FAILED
Action Scheme Raises Warnings   FAILED
Action Scheme Prevented if Unsafe   FAILED
Autocomplete=Off Prevents Form FillsFAILED
Invisiblility Prevents Form Fills   PASSED
Method Checked on Retrieval FAILED
Method Raises Warnings  FAILED
Multiple Paths Per User Per Authority   FAILED
Multiple Ports Per User Per HostFAILED
Multi. Schemes Per User Per Authority   FAILED
Page Path Checked on Retrieval  FAILED
Random Name Attr. Prevents Form Fills   PASSED
User Required for PW Retrieval  FAILED
User Required for PW Save   FAILED
Valid URIs Don't Break Anything PASSED

I reckon I'll run the test again to make sure that I did everything
correct.
   
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081215 
Lightning/1.0pre SeaMonkey/2.0a3pre ID:20081215000501

Report
Action Authority Checked on RetrievalFAILED
Action Authority Checked on Save FAILED
Action Authority Raises Warnings FAILED
Action Path Checked on Retrieval FAILED
Action Path Checked on Save FAILED
Action Scheme Checked on Retrieval FAILED
Action Scheme Checked on Save FAILED
Action Scheme Raises Warnings FAILED
Action Scheme Prevented if Unsafe PASSED
Autocomplete=Off Prevents Form Fills FAILED
Invisiblility Prevents Form Fills PASSED
Method Checked on Retrieval FAILED
Method Raises Warnings FAILED
Multiple Paths Per User Per AuthorityFAILED
Multiple Ports Per User Per Host FAILED
Multi. Schemes Per User Per AuthorityFAILED
Page Path Checked on Retrieval FAILED
Random Name Attr. Prevents Form FillsPASSED
User Required for PW Retrieval FAILED
User Required for PW Save FAILED
Valid URIs Don't Break Anything PASSED

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey