Image permissions
Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? - The Law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich, as well as the poor, to sleep under the bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread. -- Anatole France - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Installing SM v.2.x in a HD Partition OTHER Than c:\
HenriK schrieb: HenriK wrote: My memory is that a workaround was required when one wanted to have SM v.1.x installed in a HD partition other than c:\. Does SM v.2.x also require some sort of a workaround if one desires it to be installed in a HD partition other than c:\? If so, where do I find the instructions for the workaround? Thanks in advance for the assistance. I am very appreciative of the good advice but I still am not doing something right or am a bit thick in the head. I copied the original profile location under 'Documents and Settings' on my c:\ drive (all of the stuff in the folder that has what appears to be a randomly generated name) and then pasted it to the partition where I really want these files to reside. I further pointed SeaMonkey e-mail to the new location. What has happened is quite weird. The mail now goes to the new location but the address book and the bookmarks (and perhaps other things) have remained in the original 'Documents and Settings' folder on my c:\ drive. Can anybody suggest what I might have done wrong and suggest a fix for the problem? Thanks, in advance, for suggestions and comments. Would be nice if you read yur own thread completely and try the suggestons made ;-) hhpo0u$cb...@news.albasani.net Same posting via google-groups: http://www.google.com/url?url=http://groups.google.com/g/23e7fd7b/t/217a293f339b5cf8/d/26c1ef4cc775c367%3Fq%3D%2326c1ef4cc775c367ei=sPBKS461JoLCQ9izqW0sa=tct=rescd=1source=groupsusg=AFQjCNFne6e2F9kEt2xDBWN5OzwntD-Qsw -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: check only
u...@domain.invalid schrieb: jim Jim, I swear I'll killfile you if you don't start using mozilla.test group for testing! People asked you more than once to do so... Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
test only
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: History search function
jim schrieb: Very interesting. I have never overtly installed any add-on to IE -- such as Windows Search. Just for clarification: It's more like a windows add-on, not a browser add-on. But as IE is highly integratd it affects it, too. regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: test
u...@domain.invalid wrote: jim Jim, I'm sure you have been told before that there is a whole newsgroup expressly for testing your ability to post to newsgroups. And I'm fairly certain you have been told that the news group is called mozilla.test, so why do you keep posting here?? -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
Hartmut Figge wrote: Daniel: NoOp wrote: Right, a 64bit build looks like this: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Oh!! Well that then prompts the question Where can I find true 64 bit versions?? Well, if you need such a version, you surely have a 64bit machine to run it on. And with such a machine you could build a 64bit version by your own and give Robert a link to it, so that he could upload it for others. :-P Hartmut Instruction, Hartmut, instructionsif I can be of use with my 64 bit Window 7 and/or Mandriva Linux, give me instructions, please. -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: check only
Martin Freitag wrote: u...@domain.invalid schrieb: jim Jim, I swear I'll killfile you if you don't start using mozilla.test group for testing! People asked you more than once to do so... Martin Glad to see it's not just me that Jim is p1551ng off!! -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Q about mail/news sorting
I would like to know what the difference is between Sort by: Date and Sort by: Received? After years with using the Suite and now SeaMonkey, I still haven't discovered the difference in hoe the mails and news posts/threads are sorted. As it seems to me, the sort order for threads in both cases is by the newest post, making the visible dates disordered since the older posts are covering the new. When choosing Sort by: Order Received I can see that the threads are sorted by the date of first post in the thread as it also is the oldest post. The other thing that puzzles me is, when changing the sorting in any way (e.g. from Date to Order Received) the date order is automatically changed. I considered this as a bug that I hope can be corrected. I prefer to see the threads/mails in Descended order, but every time I change any other sort option, the date order is changed to Ascending order and I have to go back to View - Sort by to change it back to Descending. Why can't that option stay even if I change an other sort option? -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: test only
On or about 1/11/2010 4:50 AM, jim typed the following: jim I wonder if 'jim' and 'u...@domain.invalid are one in the same? Both are using (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616. Is it possible that he is not seeing the news group mail at all for some reason and that's why he keeps posting 'test' mail? -- Ed http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1zhwu To the extent that we encourage people who enter our society not to learn American English, we consign them basically to a life without that opportunity. -Rep. John Porter ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: check only
On 1/11/2010 2:34 AM, Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: u...@domain.invalid schrieb: jim Jim, I swear I'll killfile you if you don't start using mozilla.test group for testing! People asked you more than once to do so... Martin Glad to see it's not just me that Jim is p1551ng off!! As someone else has pointed out, Jim may not be able to read the newsgroup, so he may not be seeing all the encouragement to use mozilla.test. There's no need to get angry; just ignore it :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Q about mail/news sorting
On 1/11/2010 3:41 AM, Arne wrote: I would like to know what the difference is between Sort by: Date and Sort by: Received? Do you mean Sort by: Order Received? That is the date/time the message showed up on your doorstep, regardless of the date shown in the Date header of the message. These can be different. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why wont SM 2 open my Mozilla profile?
Devils_Advocate wrote: Justin Wood (Callek)cal...@gmail.com wrote : On 1/9/2010 9:05 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: I need Seamonkey 2 to open my Mozilla profile from 1.1.18 to see all my stored passwords, but that profile doesnt show up in SM 2 to even BE opened. SM2 copied the profile data to a new profile architechture as used by Firefox, your old profile still exists and will be found/used if you run SM1.1.x if you no longer have it installed, feel free to download it and re-install and you'll have access to that data again. SM2 should have been able to import those old passwords though on first start. It imported the bookmarks I've been using, ok, but NOT the passwords, which is a BIG hassle. I looked up some things, about starting 2. using the -migrate thing, but that still wont do it, it imports bookmarks but not passwords. I installed SM2.0 from SM1.1.18 and it DID import all passwords usernames. The difference is that it no longer automaticly fills in the blanks but waits for you to type the first letter ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: check only
Mark Hansen schrieb: There's no need to get angry; just ignore it :) As we say in Bavaria: we even don't ignore him ;-) His invalid mailaddress seems to show to an installing problem? -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd Satelliten FAQ, PC-Tipps, Katzen, Mopped, Garten, Heimwerken: http://www.satgerd.de/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
new usenet feature in reply
I just discovered (by accident of course) that if you highlight some words in a posting then you reply to that posting Only the username and the Hightlighted Words are quoted in your reply! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:07:33 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox upgrades. For one thing there will not be any more profile migrations. You mean if the is a 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on of SM That it will just read your current Profiles?? If so that would be wonderful Just install the new application and star right where you left off. Well Firefox 3.6 uses the same profile system as Firefox 1.0. Although it is strongly recommended that you don't try to go back to Firefox 1.0 (or 2.0 or 3.0) with a profile that has been updated by Firefox 3.6. Ditto for Thunderbird. And of course Mozilla Suite profiles all the way back from 1.7 or even earlier are forward compatible until the end of the XPFE line at SeaMonkey 1.1. I don't see it being any different for SeaMonkey 2.0 going forward. Phil That's wonderful. No more worrying about having to convert profiles just install the new application and go. The way it should be. Just use what you already created. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: check only
On 1/11/2010 7:43 AM, Gerd Schweizer wrote: Mark Hansen schrieb: There's no need to get angry; just ignore it :) As we say in Bavaria: we even don't ignore him ;-) His invalid mailaddress seems to show to an installing problem? It doesn't mean there was a problem during installation. That's just the default name you get before you specifically set one. It does seem he's having a hard time getting the news reader up and running though. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Why wont SM 2 open my Mozilla profile?
Rick Merrill wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: Justin Wood (Callek)cal...@gmail.comwrote : On 1/9/2010 9:05 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: I need Seamonkey 2 to open my Mozilla profile from 1.1.18 to see all my stored passwords, but that profile doesnt show up in SM 2 to even BE opened. SM2 copied the profile data to a new profile architechture as used by Firefox, your old profile still exists and will be found/used if you run SM1.1.x if you no longer have it installed, feel free to download it and re-install and you'll have access to that data again. SM2 should have been able to import those old passwords though on first start. It imported the bookmarks I've been using, ok, but NOT the passwords, which is a BIG hassle. I looked up some things, about starting 2. using the -migrate thing, but that still wont do it, it imports bookmarks but not passwords. I installed SM2.0 from SM1.1.18 and it DID import all passwords usernames. The difference is that it no longer automaticly fills in the blanks but waits for you to type the first letter ... That's the new methods as mandated by Banks and Financial institutions. When really if your doing such they should be encrypted and use a Master Password would be proper thing to do. But because people hate using Master passwords the Financial institutions demanded this. You can get the old method back by following Directions at: http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-remember-passwords/ Note everytime there is an update to SM you will have to redo this. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote: Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? This is bug #78104. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Installing SM v.2.x in a HD Partition OTHER Than c:\
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:42:18 -0500, HenriK bedp...@attglobal.net wrote: HenriK wrote: My memory is that a workaround was required when one wanted to have SM v.1.x installed in a HD partition other than c:\. Does SM v.2.x also require some sort of a workaround if one desires it to be installed in a HD partition other than c:\? If so, where do I find the instructions for the workaround? Thanks in advance for the assistance. I am very appreciative of the good advice but I still am not doing something right or am a bit thick in the head. I copied the original profile location under 'Documents and Settings' on my c:\ drive (all of the stuff in the folder that has what appears to be a randomly generated name) and then pasted it to the partition where I really want these files to reside. I further pointed SeaMonkey e-mail to the new location. What has happened is quite weird. The mail now goes to the new location but the address book and the bookmarks (and perhaps other things) have remained in the original 'Documents and Settings' folder on my c:\ drive. Can anybody suggest what I might have done wrong and suggest a fix for the problem? Thanks, in advance, for suggestions and comments. The following is the memo I left myself after I upped to SM2 .0 on my C: drive and then moved my SM 1.18 profile on my D: drive to a new folder on the D: drive for SM 2.0. + + + + + + Moving SM2 Profile SM newsgp I successfully moved my SM2 profile from under XP on my C: drive to my D: drive where I keep all my data files. Took me only 3 installs to get it right! [grin] First thing was to clean up old SM files under XP. That included uninstalling SM1.1.18 and deleting the SM2 profile that had been created when I tried a beta copy of SM2 (location - C:\Documents and Settings\John W\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles) Install of SM2 was easy including importing all my SM1.1.18 profile info that was on my D: drive. I then created a new directory on my D: drive for the SM2 profile (I labeled it moz). With SM2 running again, I hit Tools|Switch Profile and clicked to create a new profile. I selected my new D:\moz as the location and named the new profile (JW for me). Closed SM. Using Win Explorer, I copied my SM1 profile files under D:\nsp to the new SM2 profile location, D:\moz. That is: I copied everything under that crazy code number (that Netscape assigned when I first set-up that profile) D:\nsp\jw\6tw0u8b7.slt to D\moz. Exited Explorer. Restarted SM2 and all my old profile info came up just fine with Browser, Mail, Addresses all looking and acting just like SM1. After that, I did clean up - went back to Tools|Switch Profile and deleted the default profile that was set up when I first installed SM2. + + + + + + -- JohnW-Mpls ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: test only
jim wrote: jim Jim, please, please, please don't post test messages in the support groups. We've been over and over this over the years, and it still comes back after a while. Post test messages in mozilla.test. I have copied you on this via email, in case you are having some problem seeing your posts in the group. Feel free to email me back if you are having a problem. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 9/1/2010 18:57, OldTimer told the world: The install instruction at the download site (www.chuonthis.com)stated to save the file to [SeaMonkey] but I don't know which file to use. 1) c:\Documents Settings\sony\Application Data\Mozilla\Seamonkey ? (There's also an extension subfolder in Mozilla). 2) c:\program Files\Mozilla.org\SeaMonkey ? For the time being I've placed the download file (folderpane.xpi) on my desktop. The install instructions are to open Tools and select Extensions and click Install button. The Tools menu in either SM folder (above) doesn't have Extensions, but does have Add-on Manager. However when I click on Add-on Manager there's no folderpane extension listed. And I thought I was doing so well getting it downloaded to my PC. Can you take me through the next steps? Oh, you are almost there. You already have the folderpane.xpi file, and you already know where the Add-On Manager is. Now: - Open the Add-On Manager. - Click on the second icon (Extensions) -- the one that looks like a green jigsaw puzzle piece. - Click on the Install button on the lower left. - Select the folderpane.xpi file from where you saved it (apparently your desktop) and open it. There you go! The folderpane.xpi fanished from my desktop and there's no sign of it when I Search. So I downloaded it again. When I attempted to Install it in the Add-On Manager I got the message: Incompatible Extension: Folderpane Tools will not be installed because it does not provide secure updates. I decided to try the easier way and so I deleted folderpane.xpi and as per instructions at Dotnetwizard.net to turn compatibility checking back on ...by going into 'about.config' and type 'extensions.checkCompatibility' into the search bar at top of list .. when your entry comes up, right click on it and select 'Toggle'from the context menu. 1st problem: I don't have a search bar at the top of the list - There's a Filter bar. So I scrolled down to locate extensions.checkCompatibility 2nd problem: There's no listing for extensions.checkCompatibility?? Does this mean I've done something serious? (could this have anything to do with SM freezing in Compose after first letter of an address is entered?) Where to now? Ed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote: Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? This is bug #78104. Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104. Interesting Bug (I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings using the HTML Validator extension) I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is Mozilla's Home Page and my website. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: new usenet feature in reply
Rick Merrill wrote: I just discovered (by accident of course) that if you highlight some words in a posting then you reply to that posting Only the username and the Hightlighted Words are quoted in your reply! Isn't it great?!! :) I discovered it accidentally too. Some people in my mail and usenet groups just refuse to clip to what is needed to be coherent, and this really saves time in composing a reply. Kudos to whoever changed it! bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
mark messages read after ...
I experimented with a setting that marked messages as read after some amount of time ... and now I cannot find that setting again ;-0 But I did attempt due diligence in checking out the New HELP system which is much improved! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mark messages read after ...
On 1/11/2010 10:19 AM, Rick Merrill wrote: I experimented with a setting that marked messages as read after some amount of time ... and now I cannot find that setting again ;-0 But I did attempt due diligence in checking out the New HELP system which is much improved! In SeaMonkey 1.1.X, go to Edit - Preferences - Mail Newsgroups - Message Display and have a look in the General box. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
On 1/11/2010 10:03 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote: Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? This is bug #78104. Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104. Interesting Bug (I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings using the HTML Validator extension) I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is Mozilla's Home Page and my website. While the W3C validator reported 14 warnings (not 291) for the cited bug report, it did not find any HTML errors. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mark messages read after ...
Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/11/2010 10:19 AM, Rick Merrill wrote: I experimented with a setting that marked messages as read after some amount of time ... and now I cannot find that setting again ;-0 But I did attempt due diligence in checking out the New HELP system which is much improved! In SeaMonkey 1.1.X, go to Edit - Preferences - Mail Newsgroups - Message Display and have a look in the General box. Thanks so much - and it was so easy too! :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Wallet Preference Variables
In my user.js file, I have set wallet.crypto and wallet.crypto.autocompleteoverride both to True. From various comments in this newsgroup, I get the impression that Wallet is no longer used. Are these preference variables still recognized? -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Update
As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.2 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Release Notes. Note: All SeaMonkey 1.x and old Mozilla or Netscape suite users are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0.x by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-01-11 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.2 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SM 2.0.1- old (1.18) SM mail (inbox) still in use!?
Am 09.01.2010 00:05 schrieb Rainer: ... Any idea why seamonkey still uses my old e-mail files? What must I do before I can delete the old profile? I am wondering if nobody else has experienced this behaviour? Updating to SM 2.0.1 and then deleting the files in the old profile must be an often used way?! Rainer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
Phillip Jones wrote: (I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings using the HTML Validator extension) I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is Mozilla's Home Page and my website. There are plenty of non-bozos out there: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.clamwin.com/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://communitylinux.org http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.debian.org/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://fark.com http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.gentoo.org/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.ghacks.net/2010/01/02/how-to-choose-a-linux-distribution-flow-chart/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.ic3.gov/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.linuxcommand.org/man_pages/lsmod8.html http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.nerdkits.com/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.noooxml.org/irregularities http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.opera.com/support/mastering/kiosk/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://users.skynet.be/fa258499/extensions.html http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.skype.com/products/skypeout/rates/connection_fee.html http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://veecad.com/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SM 2.0.1- old (1.18) SM mail (inbox) still in use!?
Rainer a écrit : Am 09.01.2010 00:05 schrieb Rainer: ... Any idea why seamonkey still uses my old e-mail files? What must I do before I can delete the old profile? I am wondering if nobody else has experienced this behaviour? Updating to SM 2.0.1 and then deleting the files in the old profile must be an often used way?! It's impossible for version 2 to use a version 1 profile. I'm thinking that you were using Quick Launch. If that is the case, then, even though you have installeed 2.0.x, it's 1.1.x that gets launched every time you launch SM. Which would explain why your old email files are still used and why deleting them seems to be causing problems. You need to disable Quick Launch to use version 2. S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
On Jan 11, 2:24 am, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Daniel: NoOp wrote: Right, a 64bit build looks like this: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Oh!! Well that then prompts the question Where can I find true 64 bit versions?? Well, if you need such a version, you surely have a 64bit machine to run it on. And with such a machine you could build a 64bit version by your own and give Robert a link to it, so that he could upload it for others. :-P Hartmut Instruction, Hartmut, instructionsif I can be of use with my 64 bit Window 7 and/or Mandriva Linux, give me instructions, please. -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel I've done a build from release sources on Mandriva Linux 2010 x86_64 by following the instructions in the README linked on the release page: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.0.1#source Read http://developer.mozilla.org/en/Build_Documentation for instructions on how to build your own copy of SeaMonkey. Rolf ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
video problem/question
Trying to watch a video on SM 1.1.18 without success. Tried FF 3.5.6 and was successful. Below is URL. Any suggestions other than going to SM2. http://www.thefoxnation.com/judge-andrew-napolitano/2010/01/11/judge-andrew-napolitanos-constitution-and-freedom-part-1 Thanks ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Installing SM v.2.x in a HD Partition OTHER Than c:\
Martin Freitag wrote: HenriK schrieb: HenriK wrote: My memory is that a workaround was required when one wanted to have SM v.1.x installed in a HD partition other than c:\. Does SM v.2.x also require some sort of a workaround if one desires it to be installed in a HD partition other than c:\? If so, where do I find the instructions for the workaround? Thanks in advance for the assistance. I am very appreciative of the good advice but I still am not doing something right or am a bit thick in the head. I copied the original profile location under 'Documents and Settings' on my c:\ drive (all of the stuff in the folder that has what appears to be a randomly generated name) and then pasted it to the partition where I really want these files to reside. I further pointed SeaMonkey e-mail to the new location. What has happened is quite weird. The mail now goes to the new location but the address book and the bookmarks (and perhaps other things) have remained in the original 'Documents and Settings' folder on my c:\ drive. Can anybody suggest what I might have done wrong and suggest a fix for the problem? Thanks, in advance, for suggestions and comments. Would be nice if you read yur own thread completely and try the suggestons made ;-) hhpo0u$cb...@news.albasani.net Same posting via google-groups: http://www.google.com/url?url=http://groups.google.com/g/23e7fd7b/t/217a293f339b5cf8/d/26c1ef4cc775c367%3Fq%3D%2326c1ef4cc775c367ei=sPBKS461JoLCQ9izqW0sa=tct=rescd=1source=groupsusg=AFQjCNFne6e2F9kEt2xDBWN5OzwntD-Qsw Rest assured that I while I may be 72 and have had considerable eye surgery, I still see well enough to read things accurately and completely. I printed out your suggestions and, so far as I can tell, did exactly what you said to do. However, I should have also mentioned that when I deleted the original profile in 'Documents and Settings' that , SM 2.01 wouldn't work any more and returned the following error message when I tried to start either SeaMonkey or SeaMonkey Mail: SeaMonkey is already running but is not responding. To open an new window, you must first close the existing SeaMonkey process, or restart your system. As I don't understand what it means to ... close the existing SeaMonkey process ... and I don't see any SeaMonkey things when I do contr-alt-del, I repeatedly cold booted the system, but the same error message keeps being returned. SeaMonkey and SeaMonkey e-mail only worked again when I restored the deleted profile to its original location. I.e., something goes haywire when the original profile is deleted from 'Documents and Settings'. Second, the hhpo0u$cb...@news.albasani.net reference you give appears to be in the form of an e-mail address, rather than a URL, or is in a form that I don't understand. Please clarify. Thank you, in advance, for your assistance. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SM 2.0.1- old (1.18) SM mail (inbox) still in use!?
Am 11.01.2010 21:41 schrieb Mark Hansen: On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, S. Beaulieu wrote: It's impossible for version 2 to use a version 1 profile. I'm thinking that you were using Quick Launch. ... You need to disable Quick Launch to use version 2. S. ... and make sure nothing else is launching version 1.1.X SM as well, like a Startup action, for example. I am not using Quick Launch, and this is definitely Seamonkey 2.0.1 running. SM 2.0.1 shows all my (imported from 1.18) mails as it should. Then I close SM, rename the old profile, and start SM (2.0.1 for sure ;) again, and open the mail window. If I now click for the first time to a mail or folder, the warning message ... /pop.gmx.net/Inbox could not be found appears. After cklicking 'OK' all messages seam to appear as usual, I do not see any differences. I have two mail accounts (lets say 'mail A' and 'mail B') in SM and the 'local Folders'. The message appears if I click the first time on a item in 'mail A'. After 'ok', I can read all folders / messages in 'mail A' without a warning. As soon as I click on an item in 'mail B', I get again the warning message again one time. Same for 'local folders'. Kind regards Rainer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 10:03 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote: Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? This is bug #78104. Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104. Interesting Bug (I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings using the HTML Validator extension) I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is Mozilla's Home Page and my website. While the W3C validator reported 14 warnings (not 291) for the cited bug report, it did not find any HTML errors. http://www.phillipmjones.net/Finderpicture002.png -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 10:03 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote: Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? This is bug #78104. Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104. Interesting Bug (I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings using the HTML Validator extension) I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is Mozilla's Home Page and my website. While the W3C validator reported 14 warnings (not 291) for the cited bug report, it did not find any HTML errors. http://www.phillipmjones.net/Finderpicture002.png http://www.phillipmjones.net/SeaMonkeypicture001a.png http://www.phillipmjones.net/SeaMonkeypicture002a.png -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SM 2.0.1- old (1.18) SM mail (inbox) still in use!?
Rainer wrote: Am 11.01.2010 21:41 schrieb Mark Hansen: On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, S. Beaulieu wrote: It's impossible for version 2 to use a version 1 profile. I'm thinking that you were using Quick Launch. ... You need to disable Quick Launch to use version 2. S. ... and make sure nothing else is launching version 1.1.X SM as well, like a Startup action, for example. I am not using Quick Launch, and this is definitely Seamonkey 2.0.1 running. SM 2.0.1 shows all my (imported from 1.18) mails as it should. Then I close SM, rename the old profile, and start SM (2.0.1 for sure ;) again, and open the mail window. If I now click for the first time to a mail or folder, the warning message ... /pop.gmx.net/Inbox could not be found appears. After cklicking 'OK' all messages seam to appear as usual, I do not see any differences. I have two mail accounts (lets say 'mail A' and 'mail B') in SM and the 'local Folders'. The message appears if I click the first time on a item in 'mail A'. After 'ok', I can read all folders / messages in 'mail A' without a warning. As soon as I click on an item in 'mail B', I get again the warning message again one time. Same for 'local folders'. Kind regards Rainer Look in Mail Newsgroup Account Settings. FInd your mail accounts in the left pane, and then look under Server Settings. IN Server Settings find the field which says Local Directory. Tell us what it says. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
On 01/11/2010 02:24 AM, Daniel wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Daniel: NoOp wrote: Right, a 64bit build looks like this: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Oh!! Well that then prompts the question Where can I find true 64 bit versions?? Well, if you need such a version, you surely have a 64bit machine to run it on. And with such a machine you could build a 64bit version by your own and give Robert a link to it, so that he could upload it for others. :-P Hartmut Instruction, Hartmut, instructionsif I can be of use with my 64 bit Window 7 and/or Mandriva Linux, give me instructions, please. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Build_Documentation I'll give it a go later this week w/linux if that works out ok I may try Win7 as it's a dual-boot laptop. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
OldTimer wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 9/1/2010 18:57, OldTimer told the world: The install instruction at the download site (www.chuonthis.com)stated to save the file to [SeaMonkey] but I don't know which file to use. 1) c:\Documents Settings\sony\Application Data\Mozilla\Seamonkey ? (There's also an extension subfolder in Mozilla). 2) c:\program Files\Mozilla.org\SeaMonkey ? For the time being I've placed the download file (folderpane.xpi) on my desktop. The install instructions are to open Tools and select Extensions and click Install button. The Tools menu in either SM folder (above) doesn't have Extensions, but does have Add-on Manager. However when I click on Add-on Manager there's no folderpane extension listed. And I thought I was doing so well getting it downloaded to my PC. Can you take me through the next steps? Oh, you are almost there. You already have the folderpane.xpi file, and you already know where the Add-On Manager is. Now: - Open the Add-On Manager. - Click on the second icon (Extensions) -- the one that looks like a green jigsaw puzzle piece. - Click on the Install button on the lower left. - Select the folderpane.xpi file from where you saved it (apparently your desktop) and open it. There you go! The folderpane.xpi fanished from my desktop and there's no sign of it when I Search. So I downloaded it again. When I attempted to Install it in the Add-On Manager I got the message: Incompatible Extension: Folderpane Tools will not be installed because it does not provide secure updates. I decided to try the easier way and so I deleted folderpane.xpi and as per instructions at Dotnetwizard.net to turn compatibility checking back on ...by going into 'about.config' and type 'extensions.checkCompatibility' into the search bar at top of list .. when your entry comes up, right click on it and select 'Toggle'from the context menu. 1st problem: I don't have a search bar at the top of the list - There's a Filter bar. So I scrolled down to locate extensions.checkCompatibility 2nd problem: There's no listing for extensions.checkCompatibility?? Does this mean I've done something serious? (could this have anything to do with SM freezing in Compose after first letter of an address is entered?) Where to now? Ed Well, I went ahead and tried the easier way - (thanks to MCBastos Philip), and my accounts are arranged in the order I want and I've also set a different account as default. You can't know how much your help has been appreciated. But now I'm still left with the two questions: 1) I understand I originally disabled the compatibility check. How can I be sure it has been enabled and if it hasn't, how can I enable it in the light of my comments in my previous message? 2) Do you think any of this has anything to do with SM compose freezing? If not, I'll start another thread for this problem. Thanks, Ed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
chk
test only .jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SM 2.0.1- old (1.18) SM mail (inbox) still in use!?
On 1/11/2010 4:00 PM, Rainer wrote: Am 12.01.2010 00:29 schrieb Leonidas Jones: Look in Mail Newsgroup Account Settings. FInd your mail accounts in the left pane, and then look under Server Settings. IN Server Settings find the field which says Local Directory. Tell us what it says. Lee All local directories point to the NEW (2.0.1) profile, I had already checked this. But in this very moment I found the reason for my problem: In 'Settings' (not the mail-and-newsgroup settings, but the 'normal' settings), there are the categories: Is it called 'Settings' in your application? It's called 'Preferences' in mine. Perhaps you're using a different language, and it gets translated differently? I'm glad to hear you got it sorted out. Best Regards, ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SM 2.0.1- old (1.18) SM mail (inbox) still in use!?
Am 12.01.2010 01:30 schrieb Mark Hansen: Is it called 'Settings' in your application? It's called 'Preferences' in mine. Perhaps you're using a different language, and it gets translated differently? I'm glad to hear you got it sorted out. Ah yes, I am using the German version and tried to translate it back to English ;-) Kind Regards Rainer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.
Bah, it was fine on my new office machine and now it has duplicate login prompts too. :( On 1/10/2010 12:31 PM PT, Ant typed: I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, deleted this specific account files and folders/directories from my C:\Documents and Settings\FooBar\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\whatever123.default\News\, checked my prefs.js file (no signs of the old ones I just deleted), etc. After restarting SM and making a new acount, I still see the same problem. Am I mising something else to clean/delete? I do not have this problem on my new office machine with 64-bit Windows 7 HP (Dell OEM) with a clean install and setup from scratch. I am using an old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 at home that has the problems. I did NOT upgrade/migrate from SM v1.1.18 (just did a clean install and setup from scratch). -- Phillip Pi (aka Ant) Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst Partner Engineering/Internet Service Provider/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit Symantec Corporation www.symantec.com - Email: phillip...@symantec.comsymc (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail) - Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Thank you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Address Book Syncing
MCBastos wrote: Zindus seems to be a bit more focused on Zimbra (which I don't use) than gMail, Just to be clear - the zindus addon doesn't focus on Zimbra in preference to Google. In fact, due to the relative size of the user bases, the reverse has probably been true of late. But it's true that the zindus addon isn't google-specific, see: http://www.zindus.com/blog/2008/04/22/a-contact-sync-server-for-thunderbird/ Philip Chee wrote: In the SeaMonkey 2.1, Thunderbird 3.2 timeframe a Thunderbird developer, jcranmer, plans to rewrite the addressbook APIs to make them saner, actually usable by extensions such as weave and provide a unique ID for each addressbook entry which we currently don't have. This last is the main sticking point for any extension that wants to sync addressbooks Two quick observations: 1. the rewrite targets and timelines suggested above seem far from assured - here's the last thing I read about it: http://quetzalcoatal.blogspot.com/2010/01/predicted-work-on-thunderbird.html 2. sync addons don't really need contacts to have a mozilla-provided unique id because they can assign ids to contacts as per-contact attributes. That's how the zindus addon manages contact uniqueness. Regards - Leni. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
Interviewed by CNN on 11/1/2010 22:12, OldTimer told the world: OldTimer wrote: But now I'm still left with the two questions: 1) I understand I originally disabled the compatibility check. How can I be sure it has been enabled and if it hasn't, how can I enable it in the light of my comments in my previous message? Just open the Add-On list. If compatibility is still disabled, you will see a warning and a button to re-enable it. 2) Do you think any of this has anything to do with SM compose freezing? If not, I'll start another thread for this problem. I'm unaware of any connection, but then, I don't use the Composer. But you may try disabling Folderpane Tools now that you set things the way you like -- no, the account order will *not* revert to the way it was before. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... BOFH excuse #292: We ran out of dial tone and we're and waiting for the phone company to deliver another bottle. *Added by TagZilla 0.0661 running on Seamonkey 2.0.2 * http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Collected addresses full?
Martin Freitag wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Thanks. Have completed the export to LDIF, deleted all content from the Collected Addresses ab in SM, closed the program. Not sure which file I'm looking for in Windows Explorer -- is it history.mab? Yes. I also see a file history.mab.bak, size 2659 KB. That's just a backup. BTW, it does seem to be collecting addresses now. Nice. Feel free to import your collected addresses then if you need them. Otherwise, happy collecting ;-) I'd say more than half are from spammers, but there are hundreds of good ones that I should keep. It might take me weeks to go through and sort them all out -- easier to just let SM keep collecting. This is probably why I let it get so large in the first place. ;-\ -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
JeffM wrote: Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. There are a lot of bozos who are putting up Web pages but who have NO IDEA what they are doing. The next time you encounter this situation, go to this page: http://validator.w3.org/ Feed in the URL of the page with problems. You should see something like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.debian.org/ **Passed** and not like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8 3134 Errors At that point, you will know where to place the blame. Of course, some reported errors are just plain silly: Line 9, Column 47: Attribute BORDER is not a valid attribute. Did you mean border? (from a frameset declaration) -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
NoOp wrote: On 01/09/2010 04:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM jef...@email.com wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq Turn on cookies works for me: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100106 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Without cookies, the page comes up blank except for the basiceFax edge left English | United States [ Change ] Sign Up ProductsPricing Promotions Enterprise Contact Us My Account Who knew? I mean, if we weren't techies, would we have a clue what was wrong? Sites that require cookies without bothering to tell you or provide alternate content are among my pet peeves. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: check only
Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/11/2010 7:43 AM, Gerd Schweizer wrote: Mark Hansen schrieb: There's no need to get angry; just ignore it :) As we say in Bavaria: we even don't ignore him ;-) His invalid mailaddress seems to show to an installing problem? It doesn't mean there was a problem during installation. That's just the default name you get before you specifically set one. I always assumed he was intentionally concealing his real address. Lots of people do that on newsgroups. It does seem he's having a hard time getting the news reader up and running though. As far as I'm concerned, if he can't read the NG, it's useless for him to post here, so he won't even notice if Martin plonks him. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Q about mail/news sorting
Arne wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/11/2010 3:41 AM, Arne wrote: I would like to know what the difference is between Sort by: Date and Sort by: Received? Do you mean Sort by: Order Received? That is the date/time the message showed up on your doorstep, regardless of the date shown in the Date header of the message. These can be different. No, I don't mean Sort by: Order Received. As I wrote, I can see what happen with that sort order. But I can't see what happen with the plain Received sorting that is different from sorting by Date. OK, here's a theory: If you look at a message header, you'll see that it contains Date: and Received: fields. The Date: field is the date attached by the sending computer, which may or may not be accurate. The Received: fields are attached by the various servers that handle the message en route. So if you sort by Date:, you're sorting by when the sender's computer thought it sent it, and if you sort by Received:, you're sorting by when one of the mail servers thought it got it. Could be as much as several days apart. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Ping Chris Ilias
I think that sometime ago Chris posted that he wasn't maintaining his website: http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/ Chris, any plans to update for 2.x? Or, perhaps turn the site into a wiki so that others can update etc? Thanks BTW it's still an *excellent* SM resource. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: video problem/question
Norvin wrote: Trying to watch a video on SM 1.1.18 without success. Tried FF 3.5.6 and was successful. Below is URL. Any suggestions other than going to SM2. http://www.thefoxnation.com/judge-andrew-napolitano/2010/01/11/judge-andrew-napolitanos-constitution-and-freedom-part-1 Had trouble here, too, but once I wiped the vomit off my screen I could see it OK... All kidding aside, it's blank here, too. Plays OK in Internet Exploiter 8 even after I rejected all their cookies. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 11/1/2010 22:12, OldTimer told the world: OldTimer wrote: But now I'm still left with the two questions: 1) I understand I originally disabled the compatibility check. How can I be sure it has been enabled and if it hasn't, how can I enable it in the light of my comments in my previous message? Just open the Add-On list. If compatibility is still disabled, you will see a warning and a button to re-enable it. 2) Do you think any of this has anything to do with SM compose freezing? If not, I'll start another thread for this problem. I'm unaware of any connection, but then, I don't use the Composer. But you may try disabling Folderpane Tools now that you set things the way you like -- no, the account order will *not* revert to the way it was before. I updated SM to 2.0.2 and everything is now working. Thanks for all your help. This has been a blast and I've learned a little more about SM in the process. Thanks, again Ed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: about:crashes invalid url SM 2.0.3pre linux - 64bit
On 1/11/2010 5:08 PM, NoOp wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100110 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Anyone else getting this message in the 64bit version of SeaMonkey? - In the url bar enter: about:crashes - Result on this system: Alert! The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded. Works just fine on my 32bit SM - same 2.0.3pre version. Can you reply with the info from that about:buildconfig I'd like to see if it includes breakpad based on that. - ~Justin Wood (Callek) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wallet Preference Variables
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:02:08 -0800, David E. Ross wrote: In my user.js file, I have set wallet.crypto and wallet.crypto.autocompleteoverride both to True. From various comments in this newsgroup, I get the impression that Wallet is no longer used. Are these preference variables still recognized? No. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Update
Robert Kaiser wrote: As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.2 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.2 Release Notes. Note: All SeaMonkey 1.x and old Mozilla or Netscape suite users are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0.x by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-01-11 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.2 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator Can the SeaMonkey v.2.0.2 update be installed on top of (i.e., without deinstallation of) v.2.0.1? I am not quite clear on the best approach for v.2.x. updates. Thank you, in advance, for your assistance. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Image permissions
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote: Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server only' (although I already use adblock). I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked. Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com Now the problem is that the image permissions window forces you to specify the full URL of each subdomain separately. Can we have wildcard support in a future release, eg always block *.doubleclick.net, or always allow *.twimg.com ? This is bug #78104. Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104. Wow, quite an old bug. But it seems to suggest adding AdBlock like features into Mozilla as the thread progresses. Instead of going into regexes, it would be nice to be just able to allow simple wildcards for permissible image servers. - Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea; massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it. -- Gene Spafford,1992 - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
