Re: Different dictionary for different accounts and per specific message?
Arne wrote: Daniel wrote: Kjell Rilbe wrote: Hi, I'm Swedish and write most of my emails in Swedish, so would like to use the Swedish dictionary for spell checking in my e-mails. But I also write messages in several forums, in which case I write in English and would like to use the English dictionary. Also, I write in some mailing lists, which are normal e-mails, and I would like to use English dictionary for these. So, can I configure SeaMonkey to use THIS dictionary for THESE accounts, but THAT dictionary for these OTHER accounts, and also use THIS dictionary for messages to THESE recipients? If not, could such a feature be added? Kjell Kjell, one solution to your situation would be to set yourself up two profiles in SeaMonkey, one using a Swedish dictionary, the other using an English dictionary. You can set both profiles to use the same Inbox, Sent, News servers, etc, just if you need to change languages, select Tools-Switch Profiles and select the profile that uses the other dictionary. Why make it so difficult, when you can install the Dictionary Switcher extension? ;) Not a big one for extensions, Arne, but if the extension does what Kjell wants, then good. Where might he get it from?? Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Ray_Net wrote: It's not very clear explanation, so i will be more specific: Did you mean that in Windows VISTA SM1 is composed of: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ and in Windows VISTA SM2 is composed of: C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ No. Where did I say that? In any Windows OS there are are two places an application might put your data. In XP they are C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ In Vista and Windows 7 they are C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ In each pair let us call the first one Roaming and the second Local. Roaming means that if you are connected to a corporate domain (which I am sure you are not), the data is synchronized to the domain server, and will be available on any machine that you use to log into the domain. Local means that the data is only on your machine. A possible strategy is for an application to always use the Roaming directory, except for features that require a large amount of data (which would be prohibitively expensive to synchronize). I am not 100% sure of the strategies that SM1 and SM2 use. They certainly use the Roaming directory, and at least SM2 uses the Local directory (but I am not quite sure for what). -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
I want to make it clear at the beginning of this message that I tend to be reluctant to change (i.e., learning how to do things differently). I am also a person who likes to keep my world as simple as possible (getting too old to learn new tricks all of the time). I also have limited technical skills to fix problems, when they are encountered. Now, with all of that said, I will proceed with my request for help, guidance, or for any applicable comments sent my way. I continue to use SeaMonkey version 1.1.8. I have it working like an old shoe. It is doing everything I want it to do, and I understand it fairly well. I know that a day is coming when this version will become limited in accessing some web sites. Thus, I am contemplating installing the latest version of SeaMonkey on my system. I want to continue to use my old 1.1.8 version as my primary, while I make an effort to learn the latest version of SeaMonkey. I understand that I can have both on my system simultaneously without one interfering with the other. I believe I can set the new version up without transferring my address book, bookmarks, mail, etc. to the newer version. Yes, I know that I will have to establish a new profile for the new version. Is there anything incorrect about what I have said to this point? Someday, I hope to feel comfortable enough with the new version that I will want to make it my primary. This is where I am not sure of the steps I will be required to take at that time. In my mind, I think I will remove (via add/remove) the new version from my system along with its associated profile. I will then add the new version back to my system and let it move my profile, address book, bookmarks, messages, etc from the 1.1.8 version to the new version. How am I doing with my thinking? Is there a better or easier way of accomplishing this task? I suppose I could leave both old and new versions of this software on my system permanently. I would then simply start downloading my messages to the new version and in time it would by default become my primary version. In time, I could then remove the old version and its associated profile. What happens when two profiles are active on the same computer? Will it ask each time SeaMonkey is opened for the profile to use? I am guessing that each version will have its own ICON on my desktop and it will open the correct profile for that ICON--is that correct? If I move from the old to new version, leaving both on my system, is there a way to copy the bookmarks, address book, messages, etc. to the new version? If so, how is this accomplished? What specific files get copied in the old version and where are they placed in the new version? As I said in earlier correspondence, I have concerns about my being able to make the new version of SeaMonkey work properly. I continue to hear of individuals on this group having problems with the new version. I also am hearing more and more people raving about the new version. I know that I can always find help here, if something goes wrong along the way. Thanks for hearing me out and for any help/comments/suggestions sent my way on this subject. Frog ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change default from br to p
Right, what I'd like is for those br tags to actually be p tags. And br tags should appear as br / if they have to appear at all. But standards aside, I'm hoping there's a way to tweak Composer to add a keystroke for p insertion. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change default from br to p
On 17.02.2010 07:43, Jeff wrote: --- Original Message --- Right, what I'd like is for those br tags to actually be p tags. And br tags should appear as br / if they have to appear at all. But standards aside, I'm hoping there's a way to tweak Composer to add a keystroke for p insertion. Please quote at least SOME relevant text from previous replies. What was the original question, thanks. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion www.ufaq.org Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Goodbye Seamonkey
I hate to betray my own words but I cannot resist the temptation… '-_- On 14/02/10 18:03, Benoit Renard wrote: That's not the message I was referring to, though the message I am referring to is quoted in it. I'm referring to this passage: I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows (which is better than tabs.). Oh, and where in the world better is a synonym of faster? Your own words have been: Then again, Philip Jones has claimed that new windows are faster than new tabs, which is objectively wrong. http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/msg/469bab6f5d777642 AFAIK, better is often a subjective valuation that depends on specific user needs and preferences. Philip Jones stressed us many times explaining why he doesn't like tabs so it's obvious that he thinks that new windows are better than new tabs! But this doesn't mean he thinks (or wrote) that new windows are also *faster* than new tabs. -- Andrea XFox Govoni AIM/iChat/ICQ: x...@mac.com Yahoo! ID: xfox82 Skype Name: draykan PGP KeyID: 0x212E69C1 Fingerprint: FBE1 CA7D 34BE 4A53 9639 5C36 B7A0 605F 212E 69C1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
On 2/17/2010 4:41 AM, Frog wrote: I continue to use SeaMonkey version 1.1.8. I have it working like an old shoe. It is doing everything I want it to do, and I understand it fairly well. I know that a day is coming when this version will become limited in accessing some web sites. Thus, I am contemplating installing the latest version of SeaMonkey on my system. I want to continue to use my old 1.1.8 version as my primary, while I make an effort to learn the latest version of SeaMonkey. I understand that I can have both on my system simultaneously without one interfering with the other. I believe I can set the new version up without transferring my address book, bookmarks, mail, etc. to the newer version. Yes, I know that I will have to establish a new profile for the new version. Is there anything incorrect about what I have said to this point? When you migrate your 1.1.X profile into a 2.X profile, your 1.1.X profile is not touched. The information is copied not moved. So when you test your 2.X installation, you can do so with all your 1.1.X profile data like bookmarks, passwords, address book entries, etc. Just keep in mind that any changes made by SeaMonkey to outside resources, like your e-mail server will affect both applications. For example, if you download your e-mail from your mail server to your local machine (not leaving the mail on the server), then the first SM to get it wins. As a result, if you want to test SM 2.X with your actual e-mail server, you probably want to configure it to leave messages on the server, so your live SM 1.1.X version will still be able to get the e-mail messages. Someday, I hope to feel comfortable enough with the new version that I will want to make it my primary. This is where I am not sure of the steps I will be required to take at that time. In my mind, I think I will remove (via add/remove) the new version from my system along with its associated profile. I will then add the new version back to my system and let it move my profile, address book, bookmarks, messages, etc from the 1.1.8 version to the new version. How am I doing with my thinking? Is there a better or easier way of accomplishing this task? It won't move your 1.1.X profile data, it will copy (migrate) it. I suppose I could leave both old and new versions of this software on my system permanently. I would then simply start downloading my messages to the new version and in time it would by default become my primary version. In time, I could then remove the old version and its associated profile. That is certainly an option. Just keep in mind that if one version downloads messages and removes them from the server, the other version won't see the messages. What happens when two profiles are active on the same computer? SeaMonkey will make sure no other instances are running, to make sure you don't hurt yourself. However, you can run SM 2.X while an instance of SM 1.1.X is running, by passing a special command-line parameter - which I'm drawing a blank on at the moment. Perhaps someone else will chime-in and provide it. It's something like --no-remote (I think). Will it ask each time SeaMonkey is opened for the profile to use? SM 1.1.X won't see the SM 2.X profiles. SM 2.X won't see the SM 1.1.X profiles. So, having one profile for each version won't result is either version asking which profile to use. I am guessing that each version will have its own ICON on my desktop and it will open the correct profile for that ICON--is that correct? You can set it up that way, but it won't be set up that way by default. When you install SM 2.x, it assume you want to replace all the existing SM 1.1.X start menu/shortcuts. However, nothing prevents you from setting up any start menus/shortcuts you want. Just remember that you can't run both at the same time unless you deal with the special command-line parameter (mentioned above). If I move from the old to new version, leaving both on my system, is there a way to copy the bookmarks, address book, messages, etc. to the new version? If so, how is this accomplished? What specific files get copied in the old version and where are they placed in the new version? Answered above. Best Regards, ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
David Wilkinson a couché sur son écran : Ray_Net wrote: It's not very clear explanation, so i will be more specific: Did you mean that in Windows VISTA SM1 is composed of: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ and in Windows VISTA SM2 is composed of: C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ No. Where did I say that? In any Windows OS there are are two places an application might put your data. In XP they are C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ In Vista and Windows 7 they are C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ In each pair let us call the first one Roaming and the second Local. Roaming means that if you are connected to a corporate domain (which I am sure you are not), the data is synchronized to the domain server, and will be available on any machine that you use to log into the domain. Local means that the data is only on your machine. A possible strategy is for an application to always use the Roaming directory, except for features that require a large amount of data (which would be prohibitively expensive to synchronize). I am not 100% sure of the strategies that SM1 and SM2 use. They certainly use the Roaming directory, and at least SM2 uses the Local directory (but I am not quite sure for what). I can confirm for XP, that I have sm1 (as well as sm2 now)in both \application data\... and \local\application data\... Very confusing. Is there some site|faq|other where is explained what the files are used for, in fact specially the ...\local\application data\ one. The other one is quite know for me at least. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Ray_Net avait soumis l'idée : Bernard Mercier wrote: Ray_Net avait prétendu : I am under windows XP and under the RAY user login. With SM 1.1.18 the config/profile is located in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ With SM 2.0.2 the SM config/profile is located in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\ and in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Extensions\ and in: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\ Therefore after removing SM 1.1.18, installing/migrating to SM 2.0.2 i can remove the SM 1.1.18 config/profile by removing the directory: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ Could someone modify the previous text to match a Windows Vista machine ? (I wish to cleanely migrate my friend from SM1 to SM2 under his Vista pc.) Glad this point is raised. I installed sm2 also and did the import of sm1 stuff. So if I understand well, I have now twi identique data structures one for sm1 and now one for sm2. So doubling up the space used on the HDD. Can this be confirmed? If I use sometimes sm1 and sometimes sm2, I suppose the data structure of both will be different, unless there is a sync function somewhere. Probably best is to remove the old sm1 and it's data structure, so no confusiong can be there then. A good way of doing? Add/remove programs remove SM1. Add/remove programs remove SM2. Install SM2 Remove only the C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\ directory. I forgot that removing sm1 didn't remove the corresponding data of it and still can be imported at the install of sm2. Thank you. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
Mark Hansen wrote: SeaMonkey will make sure no other instances are running, to make sure you don't hurt yourself. However, you can run SM 2.X while an instance of SM 1.1.X is running, by passing a special command-line parameter - which I'm drawing a blank on at the moment. Perhaps someone else will chime-in and provide it. It's something like --no-remote (I think). Close, it's -no-remote (only one leading minus) actually. ;-) https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Command_Line_Options HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
I rushed into ver.2 without unistalling ver.1.18 or learning about any installation procedures or command line parameters and royally screwed things up. I had to reinstall WinXP because of disk file errors. I routinely reinstall XP anyway so it wasn't a super big deal, but I lost all my address book entries and bookmarks and had to redownload months of emails from the server. Now I'm using ver.2 and am not happy with all the bugs. Not sure whether to stick with Seamonkey or shift over to Firefox or Opera and Thunderbird. For the moment I'm just hanging in there on the hope that SM2 will eventually even out. And that's assuming that it will be supported adequately by most websites. I'd be glad to hear what others are planning to do in this uncertain situation. Mark Hansen wrote: SeaMonkey will make sure no other instances are running, to make sure you don't hurt yourself. However, you can run SM 2.X while an instance of SM 1.1.X is running, by passing a special command-line parameter - which I'm drawing a blank on at the moment. Perhaps someone else will chime-in and provide it. It's something like --no-remote (I think). Close, it's -no-remote (only one leading minus) actually.;-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.3 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Release Notes. Note: All SeaMonkey 1.x and old Mozilla or Netscape suite users are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0.x by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-02-17 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.3 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
Peter Anton a écrit : I routinely reinstall XP anyway so it wasn't a super big deal, but I lost all my address book entries and bookmarks and had to redownload months of emails from the server. That's why I always make a backup of my profile whenever I upgrade or install software. Not just for SM either. It's a good habit that saves a lot of grief. Now I'm using ver.2 and am not happy with all the bugs. What causes you trouble? S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
David Wilkinson wrote: Ray_Net wrote: It's not very clear explanation, so i will be more specific: Did you mean that in Windows VISTA SM1 is composed of: C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ and in Windows VISTA SM2 is composed of: C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ No. Where did I say that? In any Windows OS there are are two places an application might put your data. In XP they are C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Application Data\ C:\Documents and Settings\RAY\Local Settings\Application Data\ In Vista and Windows 7 they are C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Roaming\ C:\Users\RAY\AppData\Local\ In each pair let us call the first one Roaming and the second Local. Roaming means that if you are connected to a corporate domain (which I am sure you are not), the data is synchronized to the domain server, and will be available on any machine that you use to log into the domain. Local means that the data is only on your machine. A possible strategy is for an application to always use the Roaming directory, except for features that require a large amount of data (which would be prohibitively expensive to synchronize). I am not 100% sure of the strategies that SM1 and SM2 use. They certainly use the Roaming directory, and at least SM2 uses the Local directory (but I am not quite sure for what). Ok, thanks for fine tuning my infos : i have seen on my pc with XP: Application Data\ and Local Settings\Application Data\ containing datas from SM1 and SM2 and i did not log in a domain... But the question was: Where are located SM2 datas on a Windows Vista machine. Is it somebody that can answer this ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Ray_Net wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Ray_Net wrote: /snip/ Ok, thanks for fine tuning my infos : i have seen on my pc with XP: Application Data\ and Local Settings\Application Data\ containing datas from SM1 and SM2 and i did not log in a domain... But the question was: Where are located SM2 datas on a Windows Vista machine. Is it somebody that can answer this ? C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change default from br to p
Ray_Net wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 17.02.2010 07:43, Jeff wrote: --- Original Message --- Right, what I'd like is for thosebr tags to actually bep tags. Andbr tags should appear asbr / if they have to appear at all. But standards aside, I'm hoping there's a way to tweak Composer to add a keystroke forp insertion. Please quote at least SOME relevant text from previous replies. What was the original question, thanks. This was the original message: Is there a way to get the default enter keystroke in Composer to insert p tags rather than br tags as the default? And the answer is, not that I know of. Composer is kind of the Suite's ugly stepchild. There has very little development of it while more pressing issues with browser and mail/news/rss have been and are being dealt with. There are supposed to be some changes in that come 2.1 time, though that is quite a ways off. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
Peter Anton wrote: I rushed into ver.2 without unistalling ver.1.18 or learning about any installation procedures or command line parameters and royally screwed things up. I had to reinstall WinXP because of disk file errors. I routinely reinstall XP anyway so it wasn't a super big deal, but I lost all my address book entries and bookmarks and had to redownload months of emails from the server. Now I'm using ver.2 and am not happy with all the bugs. Not sure whether to stick with Seamonkey or shift over to Firefox or Opera and Thunderbird. For the moment I'm just hanging in there on the hope that SM2 will eventually even out. And that's assuming that it will be supported adequately by most websites. I'd be glad to hear what others are planning to do in this uncertain situation. Mark Hansen wrote: SeaMonkey will make sure no other instances are running, to make sure you don't hurt yourself. However, you can run SM 2.X while an instance of SM 1.1.X is running, by passing a special command-line parameter - which I'm drawing a blank on at the moment. Perhaps someone else will chime-in and provide it. It's something like --no-remote (I think). Close, it's -no-remote (only one leading minus) actually.;-) I had some trouble getting from 18 but since I go thing straightened oit with v2, I have done each update and am now running 2.0.3 with no problems. Stan ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Robert Kaiser wrote: As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.3 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Release Notes. Note: All SeaMonkey 1.x and old Mozilla or Netscape suite users are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0.x by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-02-17 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.3 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator I just get this update ... and he told me that my french language pack 2.0.2 is not compatible and should be disabled. Which i did - expecting that with the new 2.0.3 i will be able to check-and-update to a french language pack 2.0.3 and used this one. BUT the french language pack 2.0.3 seems unavailable. Therefore i am reluctant to upgrade my french-friend from 1.1.14 to 2.0.x ... because any SM2 upgrade will not permit him to work (he did not know enough english) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ATT security certificate error
Phillip Jones wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: robert.ga...@att.net wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: As many of you know, ATT is doing away with its WorldNet service and switching those users to its Dial Internet service. After making the appropriate changes to my server settings in SeaMonkey, I get the following error message every time I poll for new mail: Security Error: Domain Name Mismatch Paul, I also used Worldnet and have changed over to the Dial Internet service. I've not had problems receiving email so I'd expect that you should have success with the settings I'm using. new address user.n...@att.net old address user.n...@worldnet.att.net Server Type: POP Mail Server Server Name: postoffice.att.net Port: 110 Connection security: none Outgoing Server (SMTP): mailhost.att.net Because this was an account change from Worldnet to Dial Internet and not a new account, no change in email password was necessary. Well, obviously if I switch from SSL to an unsecured connection, SM won't look at the certificate and the issue vanishes. But they recommend port 995 and I'm happy to oblige. When I first made the changeover (see upthread), I followed instructions and used ipostoffice.att.net on port 995 and SM kept nagging me that the certificate didn't belong to ipostoffice.att.net, but to ipostoffice.worldnet.att.net. I was clicking OK, go ahead and make the connection, thank you very much for asking AGAIN, but I tired of it and asked for an automated way to tell SM that this particular certificate was OK. Turns out there's no way, so I've gone back to specifying ipostoffice.worldnet.att.net. But you would know that if you had read the whole thread, or even my original query. I'm going to ask a dumb question so feel free to pummel me into the ground.;-) If you like, but I won't get any pleasure out of it. does the message give you an option to accept permanently the certificate? No. If it had, I would have done so and that would've been the end of it. -- And as to the fellow's suggestion above. he was trying to do a good faith effort to get you running. The tone of your message, you sounded as if you were trying make him look stupid, for suggesting such a thing. Let's not overdramatize; I wasn't trying to make him look stupid. But to join at the end of a thread after an issue has been resolved and propose something that has already been discussed as if it were new isn't helpful. You tried your way, you failed, So he was suggesting an alternative method to get you running. Now it begins to look like you haven't read the thread either. If you'll read upthread you'll see that the issue has been resolved, though not exactly the way I would have hoped. I've gone back to using the soon-to-be-obsolete worldnet address, which does not provoke the prompt. Somewhere between now and March 15, ATT will probably fix the certificate issue and I'll find I have to use the new mail server address; easily managed. This will be the last time I go to the trouble of reiterating everything that has gone before in the thread. If you have something to contribute, great, but if you just want to see how well I can paraphrase, please go somewhere else. I have better things to do with my time. Thank you. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Change default from br to p
On 17.02.2010 15:50, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 17.02.2010 07:43, Jeff wrote: --- Original Message --- Right, what I'd like is for thosebr tags to actually bep tags. Andbr tags should appear asbr / if they have to appear at all. But standards aside, I'm hoping there's a way to tweak Composer to add a keystroke forp insertion. Please quote at least SOME relevant text from previous replies. What was the original question, thanks. This was the original message: Is there a way to get the default enter keystroke in Composer to insert p tags rather than br tags as the default? Thanks .. I know of no way that can be done without editing the source code. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion www.ufaq.org Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Leonidas Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Ray_Net wrote: /snip/ Ok, thanks for fine tuning my infos : i have seen on my pc with XP: Application Data\ and Local Settings\Application Data\ containing datas from SM1 and SM2 and i did not log in a domain... But the question was: Where are located SM2 datas on a Windows Vista machine. Is it somebody that can answer this ? C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey Is the C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Local\ empty ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
David Wilkinson wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I expected SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista not the two places of a mozilla directory in Windows7. In other words,and in short, after remove SM1 and install SM2 in a Vista machine Where is the directory(ies)(profile stuff) of the old SM1 that i can delete ? superb if i have the directories(profile stuff) of SM1 and SM2 explained. Ray: First of all, Vista and Windows 7 are the same. ... What??? They may share some common features for a particular purpose, but they are most certainly NOT the same! -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Ray_Net a écrit : I just get this update ... and he told me that my french language pack 2.0.2 is not compatible and should be disabled. Which i did - expecting that with the new 2.0.3 i will be able to check-and-update to a french language pack 2.0.3 and used this one. BUT the french language pack 2.0.3 seems unavailable. Therefore i am reluctant to upgrade my french-friend from 1.1.14 to 2.0.x ... because any SM2 upgrade will not permit him to work (he did not know enough english) I had the same thing happen when I switched from 2.0 to 2.0.1. Don't worry: it didn't change anything and my SM still is in French. I think it's because the language components simply are now included in the software itself without our having to download it separately. As I said, I just ignored the message and went ahead, and everything remained in French. I don't see why that would have changed in 2.0.3. S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Ray_Net wrote: I just get this update ... and he told me that my french language pack 2.0.2 is not compatible and should be disabled. Which i did - expecting that with the new 2.0.3 i will be able to check-and-update to a french language pack 2.0.3 and used this one. BUT the french language pack 2.0.3 seems unavailable. Therefore i am reluctant to upgrade my french-friend from 1.1.14 to 2.0.x ... because any SM2 upgrade will not permit him to work (he did not know enough english) 1) It's probably best to use the French version right away. 2) If you're using language packs despite that, the 2.0.3 language packs available from the download page are now compatible with all future 2.0.x versions and will not bring up that warning. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
Thank you for responding to my message. I do have a few places where I need a little more clarification. See my comments-questions below. Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/17/2010 4:41 AM, Frog wrote: I continue to use SeaMonkey version 1.1.8. I have it working like an old shoe. It is doing everything I want it to do, and I understand it fairly well. I know that a day is coming when this version will become limited in accessing some web sites. Thus, I am contemplating installing the latest version of SeaMonkey on my system. I want to continue to use my old 1.1.8 version as my primary, while I make an effort to learn the latest version of SeaMonkey. I understand that I can have both on my system simultaneously without one interfering with the other. I believe I can set the new version up without transferring my address book, bookmarks, mail, etc. to the newer version. Yes, I know that I will have to establish a new profile for the new version. Is there anything incorrect about what I have said to this point? When you migrate your 1.1.X profile into a 2.X profile, your 1.1.X profile is not touched. The information is copied not moved. So when you test your 2.X installation, you can do so with all your 1.1.X profile data like bookmarks, passwords, address book entries, etc. I understand. The same profile will be present/available in both versions. Just keep in mind that any changes made by SeaMonkey to outside resources, like your e-mail server will affect both applications. For example, if you download your e-mail from your mail server to your local machine (not leaving the mail on the server), then the first SM to get it wins. As a result, if you want to test SM 2.X with your actual e-mail server, you probably want to configure it to leave messages on the server, so your live SM 1.1.X version will still be able to get the e-mail messages. I understand. I remember a setting that allowed mail to be downloaded without removing it from the server--I will have to locate that setting again. Someday, I hope to feel comfortable enough with the new version that I will want to make it my primary. This is where I am not sure of the steps I will be required to take at that time. In my mind, I think I will remove (via add/remove) the new version from my system along with its associated profile. I will then add the new version back to my system and let it move my profile, address book, bookmarks, messages, etc from the 1.1.8 version to the new version. How am I doing with my thinking? Is there a better or easier way of accomplishing this task? It won't move your 1.1.X profile data, it will copy (migrate) it. I am not sure I understand this action. I know that all of my messages will be present on my old SeaMonkey application on decision day (the day I decide to move to the new version of SeaMonkey), but only some of the total messages will be present on my new version of SeaMonkey. What are the steps I will be required to take in order to make all of the messages on the old version appear on the new version at that time? I know that my profile is located at C:\Documents and Settings\frog\application Data\Mozilla\Profiles. I also know that my mail messages are also included under this Profile. I suppose I could leave both old and new versions of this software on my system permanently. I would then simply start downloading my messages to the new version and in time it would by default become my primary version. In time, I could then remove the old version and its associated profile. That is certainly an option. Just keep in mind that if one version downloads messages and removes them from the server, the other version won't see the messages. Understand. I will have to cause the old version to leave the messages on the server and cause the new version to remove the messages when the switch is made. What happens when two profiles are active on the same computer? SeaMonkey will make sure no other instances are running, to make sure you don't hurt yourself. However, you can run SM 2.X while an instance of SM 1.1.X is running, by passing a special command-line parameter - which I'm drawing a blank on at the moment. Perhaps someone else will chime-in and provide it. It's something like --no-remote (I think). I'm not sure I will want to take this action--not sure enough of my technical skills to take this action at this time. Will it ask each time SeaMonkey is opened for the profile to use? SM 1.1.X won't see the SM 2.X profiles. SM 2.X won't see the SM 1.1.X profiles. So, having one profile for each version won't result is either version asking which profile to use. I will likely employ the same profile information on both versions. I am guessing that each version will have its own ICON on my desktop and it will open the correct profile for that ICON--is that correct? You can set it up that way, but it won't be set up that way by
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
Jens Hatlak wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: SeaMonkey will make sure no other instances are running, to make sure you don't hurt yourself. However, you can run SM 2.X while an instance of SM 1.1.X is running, by passing a special command-line parameter - which I'm drawing a blank on at the moment. Perhaps someone else will chime-in and provide it. It's something like --no-remote (I think). Close, it's -no-remote (only one leading minus) actually. ;-) https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Command_Line_Options HTH Jens Thanks for the information. I will attempt to understand this before I take any steps to make it happen. I do like the idea of being able to have both SeaMonkey versions active at the same time; however, not at the expense of doing something that causes both systems to stop working. Frog ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sm 1.18 Jpeg Default
How do I change the default application for jpeg files being called up via SM 1.18? Preferences offers a way to change Helper Applications but not the Default - and I'm stuck with an unavoidable default to an unworkable app. -- JohnW-Mpls ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Changing Bugzilla password
A couple of days ago, I was going to make a post to Bugzilla, but stuffed up my password, so was locked out. I requested a new password, received an e-mail with a link where I had to enter a new password (twice) which I did, and got a page telling me the token had expired. Last night, I again requested a new password and this morning I had an e-mail with a link to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/token.cgi?t=jYhy8cFjn3a=cfmpw and telling me If you do nothing, the request will lapse after 3 days (on February 20, 2010 at 02:56 PST) or when you log in successfully. Well, I'm well with-in the time limit, but again, I'm getting the message telling me The token you submitted does not exist, has expired, or has been canceled. Anybody know what's going on?? Any suggestions?? Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
Frog wrote: Thank you for responding to my message. I do have a few places where I need a little more clarification. See my comments-questions below. ---snip--- As a result, if you want to test SM 2.X with your actual e-mail server, you probably want to configure it to leave messages on the server, so your live SM 1.1.X version will still be able to get the e-mail messages. I understand. I remember a setting that allowed mail to be downloaded without removing it from the server--I will have to locate that setting again. The setting is leave messages on sever you have to go into mail newsgroup account settings. then server settings. click leave messages on server and also tick until I delete them. You have to for each email box, and and each newsgroup server. ---snip--- Best Regards, Thanks very much for your help. I would be lost, if it were not for individuals like yourself helping me with my problems. Frog -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sm 1.18 Jpeg Default
JohnW-Mpls wrote: How do I change the default application for jpeg files being called up via SM 1.18? Preferences offers a way to change Helper Applications but not the Default - and I'm stuck with an unavoidable default to an unworkable app. In preferences (for Mac) or whatever its called for PC's go to Browser helper applications. choose jpg double-click and button will appear it will give you option browse for a desired application -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Robert Kaiser wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I just get this update ... and he told me that my french language pack 2.0.2 is not compatible and should be disabled. Which i did - expecting that with the new 2.0.3 i will be able to check-and-update to a french language pack 2.0.3 and used this one. BUT the french language pack 2.0.3 seems unavailable. Therefore i am reluctant to upgrade my french-friend from 1.1.14 to 2.0.x ... because any SM2 upgrade will not permit him to work (he did not know enough english) 1) It's probably best to use the French version right away. 2) If you're using language packs despite that, the 2.0.3 language packs available from the download page are now compatible with all future 2.0.x versions and will not bring up that warning. What should i do now ? Re-enable french language pack 2.0.2 or: - uninstall french language pack 2.0.2 - install french language pack 2.0.3 from the page http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#langpacks the second step bring me a little line saying: Seamonkey prevented this site(www.seamonkey-project.org) from asking you to install software on your computer. Could i click on the Install sotware button ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Robert Kaiser wrote: As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process, SeaMonkey 2.0.3 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to this latest release. If you already have SeaMonkey 2.0, you will receive an automated update notification within 24 to 48 hours. This update can also be applied manually by selecting Check for Updates... from the Help menu. For a list of changes and more information, please review the SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Release Notes. Note: All SeaMonkey 1.x and old Mozilla or Netscape suite users are encouraged to upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0.x by downloading it from www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-02-17 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.3 System Requirements: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/system-requirements Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey project coordinator I'm already using the RC candidate is there any reason to download the gold version and install it. I've noticed for now my crashes have disappeared. Still have a nagging problem with when sending email or replies to emails the window indicating progress remains on screen long after item is sent and copy has been made and saved. Have to dismiss the progress bar. I have let it run for 5 minutes in background just to see if it would quit on it own. I have posted a bug. so far no one has even looked at it. Gues pay back for some comments I've made for other bugs. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Goodbye Seamonkey
Daniel wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Daniel wrote: Several times, over the years, I have suggested that there *SHOULD* be a clickable link as part of the Mail Newsgroup splash screen, but, sadly, I'm still waiting. The alteration would have to happen in chrome://messenger/content/start.xhtml but I don't know how to do it. If you ask how to do it for yourself only: 1. Go to your SeaMonkey install directory 2. Open chrome/messenger.jar with a ZIP program (e.g. 7-Zip) 3. Edit content/messenger/start.xhtml ( 4. Open chrome/en-US.jar with a ZIP program 5. Edit en-US/messenger/start.dtd ) Your changes will be overwritten whenever you update SM. If you ask how to do it for everyone: 1. File a bughttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=SeaMonkey 2. Describe exactly what you propose 3. Find someone to implement it 4. Get the module owner (Karsten) to accept it HTH Jens Yes, Jens, you are right, I should put it in through Bugzilla.and if I can remember my password, I will!! On the given page ... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=SeaMonkey ... you have the possibility to retrieve/create a new password based on your email adress: it's written: If you have an account, but have forgotten your password, enter your e-mail address below and submit a request to change your password. Ray, I've got myself in a messfirst time I wasn't sure of my password, tried several, until bugzilla barred me, then I located my real password and tried to retrieve/create my password, but, because I was barred, I cannot even change my password, so now I guess I'll have to make a new profile. Shouldn't this be temporary? Try again. If that doesn't work, ask for support from an administrator. Yep, it's been a couple of days, so I'll have to give this a try. Daniel Now my new password is expiring before it's used.see new thread Changing Bugzilla password Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Goodbye Seamonkey
Andrea Govoni wrote: On 15/02/10 12:42, Daniel wrote: Andrea, are we talking about the same thing?? After reading this message, I don't think so. Two situations. Whilst you are reading here, you also have your browser open set to whatever your home page may be. You then click on the above link to make sure it is the right message. In one situation, the groups.google page opens in a Tab of your browser, sharing the browser with your homepage. In the other situation, a second browser opens to display the groups.google all on its own. One browser window with two tabs open or two browser windows each with one tab open. Finally I understand why you don't understand. You're missing a third situation, the one that I, Philip Jones and others called same window. In this situation, the Google Groups page opens in the *same window* of the homepage, replacing its content (the homepage) with the new content (the Google Groups page). The result is always one browser window with only one open tab. To enable this behavior go to Preferences… -- Browser -- Tabbed Browsing -- Links from other applications -- The current tab/window. OK, so we've moved on from the original New Windows v Tabs to just using the same window. OK, Andrea, I can live with that!! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Changing Bugzilla password
In news:wr-dnyakp7ithohwnz2dnuvz_rwdn...@mozilla.org, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: [about problems resetting a BMO password] Well, I'm well with-in the time limit, but again, I'm getting the message telling me The token you submitted does not exist, has expired, or has been canceled. Anybody know what's going on?? Any suggestions?? You could try mailing bugzilla-admin[at]mozilla[dot]org -- »Q« /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / against html e-mailX http://asciiribbon.org/ / \ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Changing Bugzilla password
»Q«: [...] http://asciiribbon.org/ You should that to http://www.asciiribbon.org/ ;) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Somewhat afraid to make the change from 1.1.8 to new SeaMonkey
On 2/17/2010 3:03 PM, Frog wrote: Thank you for responding to my message. I do have a few places where I need a little more clarification. See my comments-questions below. Mark Hansen wrote: On 2/17/2010 4:41 AM, Frog wrote: I continue to use SeaMonkey version 1.1.8. I have it working like an old shoe. It is doing everything I want it to do, and I understand it fairly well. I know that a day is coming when this version will become limited in accessing some web sites. Thus, I am contemplating installing the latest version of SeaMonkey on my system. I want to continue to use my old 1.1.8 version as my primary, while I make an effort to learn the latest version of SeaMonkey. I understand that I can have both on my system simultaneously without one interfering with the other. I believe I can set the new version up without transferring my address book, bookmarks, mail, etc. to the newer version. Yes, I know that I will have to establish a new profile for the new version. Is there anything incorrect about what I have said to this point? When you migrate your 1.1.X profile into a 2.X profile, your 1.1.X profile is not touched. The information is copied not moved. So when you test your 2.X installation, you can do so with all your 1.1.X profile data like bookmarks, passwords, address book entries, etc. I understand. The same profile will be present/available in both versions. No. Once you migrate the 1.1.X profile data into your 2.X profile, you will have two completely separate profiles, your original 1.1.X profile (unchanged by the migration) and the new 2.X profile (created using the 1.1.X profile data as a starting point). Just keep in mind that any changes made by SeaMonkey to outside resources, like your e-mail server will affect both applications. For example, if you download your e-mail from your mail server to your local machine (not leaving the mail on the server), then the first SM to get it wins. As a result, if you want to test SM 2.X with your actual e-mail server, you probably want to configure it to leave messages on the server, so your live SM 1.1.X version will still be able to get the e-mail messages. I understand. I remember a setting that allowed mail to be downloaded without removing it from the server--I will have to locate that setting again. Someday, I hope to feel comfortable enough with the new version that I will want to make it my primary. This is where I am not sure of the steps I will be required to take at that time. In my mind, I think I will remove (via add/remove) the new version from my system along with its associated profile. I will then add the new version back to my system and let it move my profile, address book, bookmarks, messages, etc from the 1.1.8 version to the new version. How am I doing with my thinking? Is there a better or easier way of accomplishing this task? It won't move your 1.1.X profile data, it will copy (migrate) it. I am not sure I understand this action. I know that all of my messages will be present on my old SeaMonkey application on decision day (the day I decide to move to the new version of SeaMonkey), but only some of the total messages will be present on my new version of SeaMonkey. What are the steps I will be required to take in order to make all of the messages on the old version appear on the new version at that time? I know that my profile is located at C:\Documents and Settings\frog\application Data\Mozilla\Profiles. I also know that my mail messages are also included under this Profile. If you have all your messages in the 1.1.X profile, what's the harm in deleting the 2.X profile and re-migrating the 1.1.X profile to 2.X? Just realize that any work you do in the 2.X profile before you perform the final migration is going to be thrown away (this is why you tell the 2.X version of SeaMonkey to leave messages on the server - so your 1.1.X version will be the one to download and delete them from the server). I suppose I could leave both old and new versions of this software on my system permanently. I would then simply start downloading my messages to the new version and in time it would by default become my primary version. In time, I could then remove the old version and its associated profile. That is certainly an option. Just keep in mind that if one version downloads messages and removes them from the server, the other version won't see the messages. Understand. I will have to cause the old version to leave the messages on the server and cause the new version to remove the messages when the switch is made. I would assume that you would have a trial period where you are using both - to test SM 2.X. During this time, SM 2.X will not delete any messages from the server - this is so your 1.1.X version will still pick them up. After you make your final switch to SM 2.X, don't use SM 1.1.X
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
On 2/17/2010 4:11 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Still have a nagging problem with when sending email or replies to emails the window indicating progress remains on screen long after item is sent and copy has been made and saved. Have to dismiss the progress bar. I have let it run for 5 minutes in background just to see if it would quit on it own. I have posted a bug. so far no one has even looked at it. How do you know that? People can look at software without notifying you, can't they? Gues pay back for some comments I've made for other bugs. Or maybe this one? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Ray_Net wrote: What should i do now ? Re-enable french language pack 2.0.2 or: - uninstall french language pack 2.0.2 - install french language pack 2.0.3 from the page http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#langpacks You don't need to uninstall, just install the new one. the second step bring me a little line saying: Seamonkey prevented this site(www.seamonkey-project.org) from asking you to install software on your computer. Could i click on the Install sotware button ? Yes. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
Phillip Jones wrote: I'm already using the RC candidate is there any reason to download the gold version and install it. I've noticed for now my crashes have disappeared. The candidates and the release are the same thing, as usual. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Interviewed by CNN on 17/2/2010 20:30, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: First of all, Vista and Windows 7 are the same. ... What??? They may share some common features for a particular purpose, but they are most certainly NOT the same! Well, 7 is an improved version of Vista. It inherits most of the big changes Vista introduced, and from a maintenance point of view, it's very similar. The 7 is actually a misnomer -- its version number is 6.1, with Vista being 6.0. Kinda like the similarity between Windows 2000 and Windows XP: as long as something didn't need/refer to a new feature introduced in XP, most tasks could be performed in the same way in both. By the way, 2000 was version 5.0 and XP was 5.1... So, they are not the same but they share a lot more than some common features for a particular purpose. Siblings would be a good word for it. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... BOFH excuse #45: virus attack, luser responsible *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.0.3 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM1 and SM2 config/profile locations with Windows Vista
Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Ray_Net wrote: /snip/ Ok, thanks for fine tuning my infos : i have seen on my pc with XP: Application Data\ and Local Settings\Application Data\ containing datas from SM1 and SM2 and i did not log in a domain... But the question was: Where are located SM2 datas on a Windows Vista machine. Is it somebody that can answer this ? C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey Is the C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Local\ empty ? No there is a similar structure there, but it contains only the cache, xul.mfl, and xpc.mfl. The nits and bolts of the profile are in the Roaming subdirectory. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't Cut, Copy or Paste in SM 2.0.1
S. Beaulieu wrote: TMitchell a écrit : Why suddenly can't I cut, copy or paste text (from within SM or pasting something from a program like Word into SM) using Win XP keyboard shortcuts or the SM edit option buttons? Is there some security setting or something that needs attention? It's a known issue (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601) due to a conflict to McAfee (sometimes hidden because McAfee is repackaged under an ISP name). You need to uninstall its Site Adviser component (which isn't in the Add/Remove programs menu) in Program Files - McAfee - Site Adviser. S. I disabled the SA service and things work fine now. Thank you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't Cut, Copy or Paste in SM 2.0.1
TMitchell wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: TMitchell a écrit : Why suddenly can't I cut, copy or paste text (from within SM or pasting something from a program like Word into SM) using Win XP keyboard shortcuts or the SM edit option buttons? Is there some security setting or something that needs attention? It's a known issue (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601) due to a conflict to McAfee (sometimes hidden because McAfee is repackaged under an ISP name). You need to uninstall its Site Adviser component (which isn't in the Add/Remove programs menu) in Program Files - McAfee - Site Adviser. S. I disabled the SA service and things work fine now. Thank you. With 2.0.3, things should even work with SA, and newer SA versions also work fine even with 2.0.1, by the way. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.3 Security Update
On 18/02/10 01:11, Phillip Jones wrote: Still have a nagging problem with when sending email or replies to emails the window indicating progress remains on screen long after item is sent and copy has been made and saved. Have to dismiss the progress bar. I have let it run for 5 minutes in background just to see if it would quit on it own. I have posted a bug. Please post the bug number the next time. :) I found it as bug 544783: Email/News Sent Progress bar does not dismiss (applies to email or News post) [1]. This is an old SeaMonkey issue (see my comment on the bug page for details). I've just voted for it. Best regards, [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544783 -- Andrea XFox Govoni AIM/iChat/ICQ: x...@mac.com Yahoo! ID: xfox82 Skype Name: draykan PGP KeyID: 0x212E69C1 Fingerprint: FBE1 CA7D 34BE 4A53 9639 5C36 B7A0 605F 212E 69C1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
