Re: What about FireFox spoofing in SM 2.1 ?
Jens Hatlak wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have added with about:config as url in SM browser ... A New string: general.useragent.extra.firefox - user set - string - NOT Firefox/3.5 Should i remove this before upgrading to SM 2.1 You can do that afterward. Basically it doesn't matter since the pref will not work with SM 2.1 any longer anyway. (another question - are the profiles SM2.0 and SM2.1 nearly identical ?) Yes. Bookmarks will be stored in places.sqlite in addition to history (as is already the case with SM 2.0) and there may be more minor differences. Thanks for you and for WLS who show me the UA in 2.1. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
BMG MUSIC
Click Here to Enter: http://mybestonlineguide.com/2/bmg-music . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG DIRECT MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICES SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT BMG MUSIC HOME PAGE BMG MUSIC ANDREA BOCELLI BMG MUSIC CUSTOMER SERVICE DEF LEPPARD NIPPON BMG MUSIC SCORE BMG MUSIC CENTER MAILING ADDRESS FOR BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC CANADA HOW CAN I CALL BMG MUSIC BMG CLASSICAL MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE PHONE NUMBER SONY BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE CENTER MUSIC BMG OWNER OF BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG MUSIC CANAD SONY BMG MUSIC DOWNLOAD BMG MUSIC ADDRESS BMG MUSIC SERVICE CLUB SHIPPING BMG MUSIC CLUB OWNERSHIP BMG MUSIC PHONE NUMBER BMG MUSIC WEBSITE BMG MUSIC SELECTIONS BMG MUSIC AUSTRALIA CHRISTIAN MUSIC BMG BMG MUSIC ROCK BMG MUSIC CATALOG BMG MUSIC CLUB CANAD BMG MUSIC CLUB CANADA BMG BMG CLASSICAL MUSIC SVC BMG MUSIC PENSION PLAN BMG MUSIC STORES BMG MUSIC HAIFETZ COLLECTION BMG MUSIC CONTACT INFORMATION HOW TO CONTACT BMG MUSIC SERVICE BMG MUSIC JOBS BMG MUSIC SERVICE NEWS BMG MUSIC SERVICE FRAUD PHONE NUMBER BMG MUSIC REMASTERED JETHRO TULL FROM BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SOURCE 800 NUMBER FOR BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG MUSIC SERVUICE SIGN UP FOR BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG JAZZ CLUB MUSIC BMG MUSIC TELEPHONE NUMBER BMG MUSIC COUPONS BMG MUSIC SERVICE CLUB NEWS BMG MUSIC NEW RAP CDS SONY BMG MUSIC VIDEOS BMG MUSIC CLUB STORE KEN BAINS BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC COUNTRY CLASSICS 1992 SONY BMG MUSIC CANADA INC MINORS AND BMG MUSIC CONTRACT BMG MUSIC FREE RSS BMG MUSIC CUSTOMER LOGIN BMG MUSIC PROMOTION ANIME BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG MUSIC WORLD PHONE CONTACT BMG MUSIC SERVICE GARY WINEBAR BMG MUSIC CLUBS BMG MUSIC CODES BMG MUSIC CDS BMG MUSIC PUBLISHING BUYS BMG MUSIC NEW YORK NY MEMBER BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC CLASSIC ROCK ESSENTIALS BMG MUSIC CLASSIC ROCK ONG BAK BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC CLUB PHONE NUMBER BMG MUSIC STORE BMG MUSIC GUIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC POLICY CHANGES SONGWRITER CONTEST NASHVILLE TN BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE MAILING ADDRESS SONY BMG MUSIC MARKETING PLAN SIMON COWELL BMG MUSIC SONEY BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICES CONTACT INFORMATION SONY BMG MUSIC DVD SALE SOUND AND SPIRIT MUSIC BMG BMG MUSIC SERVICE OFFER OVERVIEW SONY MUSIC BOX BMG BMG CLASSICAL MUSIC SERVICE BMG MUSIC SERVICE NO NEW MEMBERS BMG MUSIC SERVICE CLUB BMG MUSIC SOUND AND SPIRIT BMG MUSIC SERVICE INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA BMG MUSIC SINGAPORE BMG MUSIC BOX HOW TO CANCEL BMG MUSIC BMG LATIN MUSIC COM BMG MUSIC SERVICE GUITAR SALE CALLING BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE NUMBER CD CLUB LIKE BMG MUSIC CONTACT BMG MUSIC BMG SONY MUSIC CLUB BMG MUSIC SERVICE ORDER PENDING BMG RICORDI MUSIC BEUNOS ARIES BMG RECORDS MUSIC CLUB COLUMBIA HOUSE BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG SONY MUSIC BOX BMG MUSIC SERVICE ONLINE BMG MUSIC SERVICE INDIANAPOLIS BMG MUSIC SERVICE INDIANA COLUMBIA HOUSE BMG MUSIC MERGER COM BMG MUSIC SERVICE BMG MUSIC SERVICE MAGAZINE COLUMBIA HOUSE MUSIC BMG COLUMBIA HOUSE CDS BMG MUSIC SERVICES COM BMG MUSIC SERVICE DOWNLOADING MUSIC CLASSICAL MUSIC ONLINE AND BMG BMG MUSIC SERVICE IN INDIANAPOLIS CLASSICAL MUSIC BMG BMG MUSIC SERVICE MEMBERSHIP BMG MUSIC SERVICE MEL TORM BMG MUSIC SERVICE MEMBER LOG IN CLUB BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC TOLL FREE NUMBER BMG MUSIC SERVICECOM BMG MUSIC SERVICES SAID BMG MUSIC TERRE HAUTE BMG MUSIC VIDEOS BMG MUSIC SERVICE TELEPHONE BMG MUSIC SERVICE TOLL FREE NUMBER BMG MUSIC SERVICE TELEPHONE NUMBER BMG MUSIC SITE WEB BMG MUSIC SERVIVE BMG MUSIC SREVICE BMG MUSIC SONY BMG MUSIC SERVIE BMG MUSIC TELEPHONE BMG MUSIC SERVIE GUITARS SALE BMG MUSIC SERVIE GUITAR SALES BMG MUSIC SERVICE TEL BMG MUSIC SERVICE PAYMENTS ONLINE BMG MUSIC ZEPPELIN BMG MUSIC SERVICE PHONE MUNBER BMG MUSIC SERVICE PHNE NUMBER BMG MUSIC SERVICE OUT OF BUSINESS BMG PRODUCTION MUSIC UK BMG MUSICSEARCH CLASSICAL MUSIC BMG PRODUCTION MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE SHIPPING HANDLING FEES BMG MUSIC SERVICE SHIPPING COST BMG MUSIC SERVICE SOUND SPIRIT BMG MUSIC WEB SITE BMG MUSIC WHICH ENGAGED IN THE BMG MUSIC WITHOUT CREDIT CARD BMG MUSIC SERVICE PORTLAND BMG MUSIC SERVICE PHONE NUMBER 20 SONY BMG MUSIC DOWLOAD SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERAINMENT SONY BMG MUSIC CORPORATE BRANDING STRATEGY SONY BMG MUSIC BOX SONY BMG MUSIC CANADA SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT AUSTRALIA NEWS SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT ITALY SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT LP SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GREECE SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT CONTACT SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT DISTRIBUTION SONY BMG GOSPEL MUSIC PRICE OF 1 BMG MUSIC SERVICE PROMOTION CODES BMG MUSIC PRICE BMG MUSIC SERVICE PHONE NUMBER FOR BMG MUSIC SERVICE POINT OF CONTACT BMG MUSIC RCA MUSIC GROUP BMG MATT WALSH SELL MY BMG MUSIC CDS SONG BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT SEGA GT MUSIC BMG TRACKS RECORDER MUSIC GROUPS BMG SEARCH PHP Q BMG MUSIC SERVICE SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT LP CA U S MUSIC LICENSE BMG UNCHARTED MUSIC COMPETITION BMG AUSTRALIA TROY DICKSON SONY BMG MUSIC CANADA THEY ACQUIRED THE BMG MUSIC WHICH TOLL FREE NUMBER BMG MUSIC
Problem with ol
Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
[03.11.2010 13:22] »Hana Skoumalova« wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana I' m on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12 and no problem with the page ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
gNeandr wrote: [03.11.2010 13:22] »Hana Skoumalova« wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana I' m on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12 and no problem with the page No problem with the page on Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 either -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). Look more closely. I found numerous errors in your HTML: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html There appear to be no errors in your CSS: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21warning=0uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Perhaps you would want to consider not using XHTML. http://tekrider.net/html/doctype.php -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Hana Skoumalova wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Firefox/3.6.7 Lightning/1.1a1pre SeaMonkey/2.0.10 ID:20101027073647 I also see 13 as garbled:- http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142274367/sizes/l/in/photostream/ and the code looks excellent to me. Barry. http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142878112/sizes/z/in/photostream/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). Look more closely. I found numerous errors in your HTML: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I repent my sins, but now, I've corrected all errors and SM is still displaying that page incorrectly. The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Hana Skoumalova wrote: The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana Displays fine for me on Windows XP SP3 SM 2.0.10 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2pre NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 - Build ID: 20101027121512 -- You either teach people to treat you with dignity and respect, or you don't. This means you are partly responsible for the mistreatment that you get at the hands of someone else. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). Look more closely. I found numerous errors in your HTML: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I repent my sins, but now, I've corrected all errors and SM is still displaying that page incorrectly. The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I can confirm that the validator now says there are no errors, but the 13 still displays as the same garbled offset into the text. http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142971698/sizes/l/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142274367/sizes/l/in/photostream/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Le 3 novembre 2010, Beauregard T. Shagnasty a écrit : Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. What SM version did you try and on which OS? She already stated other browsers do work: I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). Look more closely. I found numerous errors in your HTML: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I repent my sins, but now, I've corrected all errors and SM is still displaying that page incorrectly. The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I can confirm that the validator now says there are no errors, but the 13 still displays as the same garbled offset into the text. http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142971698/sizes/l/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142274367/sizes/l/in/photostream/ Confirmed here with SM 2.0.10 - no errors, and the 13 at the bottom of the page overlaps the item text. -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
Hi! I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I entered. Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send to multiple people, without showing other names and letting them know it is a BCC, from one e-mail I send? Thank you in advance. :) -- The ants are my friends, they're blowin' in the wind. The ant, sir, is blowin' in the wind. --the misheard lyrics to Bob Dylan's Blowin' in the Wind /\___/\ Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). Look more closely. I found numerous errors in your HTML: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I repent my sins, but now, I've corrected all errors and SM is still displaying that page incorrectly. The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Futkl.ff.cuni.cz%2F~skoumal%2Fcsts-faq.html I can confirm that the validator now says there are no errors, but the 13 still displays as the same garbled offset into the text. http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142971698/sizes/l/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5142274367/sizes/l/in/photostream/ Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Firefox/3.6.7 Lightning/1.1a1pre SeaMonkey/2.0.10 ID:20101027073647 whatever it is, is getting worse (as reported by Lucas), with 9 10 and 13 now all moving across into the display-data content. http://www.flickr.com/photos/22198...@n03/5143118132/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
Ant wrote: I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I entered. Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send to multiple people, without showing other names and letting them know it is a BCC, from one e-mail I send? The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each *recipient's* name in the TO: field that /they/ see? You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one at a time. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
On 11/3/10 4:22 AM, Hana Skoumalova wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 No XHTML errors. No CSS errors. I do not see the problem, either in the list of items at the top or the detailed Q and A below. Further, I see a sublist under the details of item #2, running from 1 to 15; I do not see the problem there. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ I am again filtering and ignoring all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of the amount of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Lucas Levrel wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty a écrit : Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several browsers. What SM version did you try and on which OS? She already stated other browsers do work: On the computer currently available, 1.1.17 in Ubuntu Linux. The later SeaMonkey is on my wife's computer, not currently on. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each *recipient's* name in the TO: field that /they/ see? You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one at a time. My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. As soon as I stopped doing this the bounced mails stopped. The problems were with comcast, yahoo, frontiernet, and att. There are some very serious problems with the interference to Internet communications by arbitrary/unaccountable ISP-level filters that need to be addressed. But that is another discussion for another list. -- Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E http://KD4E.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day Defend free speech or lose your freedom. I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, b ut showing To: address?
d...@kd4e.com wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each *recipient's* name in the TO: field that /they/ see? You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one at a time. My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? As soon as I stopped doing this the bounced mails stopped. I regularly send coming events-type email to a club I belong to, as the webmaster. I'll put the club address in both the FROM: and the TO:, and all the members in the BCC:. It works, and I do not see rejections or filtering from the ISPs you mention, or any others. The problems were with comcast, yahoo, frontiernet, and att. My BCC: totals are generally in the 120-130 addresses range. There are some very serious problems with the interference to Internet communications by arbitrary/unaccountable ISP-level filters that need to be addressed. But that is another discussion for another list. Agreed. :-) -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a time. Something wrong with their filters mishandled it and there is not a good way to get them to fix it. In the 21st Century E-mail needs to be protected like First Class Mail. -- Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E http://KD4E.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day Defend free speech or lose your freedom. I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
d...@kd4e.com wrote: Beauregard wrote: doc wrote: My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a time.Something wrong with their filters mishandled it and there is not a good way to get them to fix it. So .. you are getting bounces from the recipients' ISPs. Try placing fewer, say less than 25, in the BCC:s. If you are composing these emails manually, try to split up the ISP domain names as well, e.g. only a couple of each ISP in each email. In the 21st Century E-mail needs to be protected like First Class Mail. I'll agree, but don't hold your breath. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a time.Something wrong with their filters mishandled it and there is not a good way to get them to fix it. So .. you are getting bounces from the recipients' ISPs. Try placing fewer, say less than 25, in the BCC:s. If you are composing these emails manually, try to split up the ISP domain names as well, e.g. only a couple of each ISP in each email. There is a single sub-folder in my Address Book which I was placing in the BCC field with about 35 recipients in it. In the 21st Century E-mail needs to be protected like First Class Mail. I'll agree, but don't hold your breath. Failure is not an option - it is simply a matter of applying a sufficient amount of pressure upon the right elected officials and bureaucrats. One way to begin is to tweak members of the media - reminding them that their E-mail (and that of their family and friends) is vulnerable to arbitrary blocking and that they will have no reliable recourse. Do the same with bureaucrats and elected officials and their families. Make it personal to them and they will act. Enlightened self-interest is a powerful motivator. -- Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E http://KD4E.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day Defend free speech or lose your freedom. I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?
d...@kd4e.com wrote: My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a time. Something wrong with their filters mishandled it and there is not a good way to get them to fix it. In the 21st Century E-mail needs to be protected like First Class Mail. If having the TO and FROM addresses the same is a problem, then why not just get yourself another address (yahoo, gmail, hotmail...) and use that in the TO field? Unless it is really the BCC that is causing the problem... -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: filter or not filter ? That run or not...
denewton a écrit : Ed Mullen a écrit : Leonidas Jones wrote: denewtonbertranddepomm...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, I explain that in english and in french beacause that is perhaps an bug... or one fuctionality unknown... When the navigator of Seamonkey is running only (no window for the mail), if it's mails in the server, there is the bip whith the message : « you have x mails » and the messages are charged in background in the inbox. If this messages must be filter whith the filter-rules, the message are charged but the filter is forced inactiv. Then the filter function become inoperante. I constate this, when I open the mail window : the messages aren’t filtered and the filter is inactiv. When the Mail window is open whith the navigator (preferences-options), or if, before the navigator, the mail windows is open only (Seamonkey.exe –mail), the filter function run correctly. In French : Quand le navigateur de seamonkey est ouvert seul (pas de fenêtre pour le courrier) , s’il y a des mails en attente sur le serveur, seamonkey avertit de ce courrier avec bip sonore et visuel : vous avez x courriers, et il les charge en arrière plan dans les courriers entrants. Si les messages qui sont arrivés répondent à un des critères d’un filtre actif, celui-ci est désactivé et les messages ne sont pas filtrés : je le constate quand j’ouvre la fenêtre des mails après le signalement de présence de mail, les mails sont dans le courrier entrant sans avoir été filtrés et le filtre correspondant n'est plus coché actif. Si, avant d’ouvrir le navigateur, je n’ouvre que le courrier (seamonkey.exe –mail) et qu’il y a des messages sur le serveur, ce phénomène ne se produit pas et la fonction filtre fonctionne correctement. C’est la même chose si à l’ouverture de seamonkey, la messagerie est ouverte en même temps que le navigateur (option dans les préférences). What about ? sincerly Bertrand It is possible, in Preferences, to set SeaMonkey to not check for mail until the mail client is opened. That works much better from here, and while it will not really solve your issue, it should work around it. Lee And the way to do that is ... Edit - Preferences - Mail Newsgroups - check the box for Only check for new mail after opening Mail Newsgroups. Whenever that feature was introduced it drove me crazy until I figured that one out. Please! Stop doing stuff for me! I'm smart enough (marginally) to know what I want to do and when I want to do it. I try and that run well. But ground of the question isn't resolve. Sincerly Bertrand Hello This solution has one big default : the password's arn't automatic when we connect a site whith has a login and password registred in Seamonkey. When we untag this option, the login and password are automatic. Then the solution is : open both the navigator and the mailer. that is a default of Seamonkey. Bertrand ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. Please state whether you see the strange 13 in the FAQ subjectol at the top of the page, or in the Q/A at the end of the page. Just to be certain. In the Q/A part at the bottom. I am trying the page at home and I see the same error. After upgrading to SM 2.0.10 I can see the same error at the item no. 10, as well. And I can see the same error in FF (version 3.16.12 for Ubuntu), with items 10 and 11. I see, now no errors. But is it my imagination, or were you using XHTML 1.0 *Strict* when I first looked at your page? It is now Transitional, which is for use with legacy pages. Did you read my suggestions about using HTML 4.01 Strict instead? HTML should give you greater cross-browser conformity. Yes, I changed Strict to Transitional to get rid of the last three errors, which however concerned the tag link and which probably didn't have any influence on the strange behaviour of ol items. This page will become a part of a larger web page, which uses XHTML, but I will try HTML to see what happens. Another tip you might want to consider: instead of using #q1 #q2 and so forth, use real words (no numbers) related to each of the FAQ points. (I don't read your language, so can't suggest any.) This way, if you later want to add another FAQ in the middle of the list, you won't have to renumber all the rest that come after it. Oh yeah, I will think about it. :-) Hana ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Hana Skoumalova wrote: This page will become a part of a larger web page, which uses XHTML, but I will try HTML to see what happens. Still no joy. Hana ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
I want to upgrade to 2.0xxx
I’m on a stable SM 1.1.18 for the Mac now. Is there a recommended way to go directly to the latest v.2.0.10? Or, must I DO it in stages? What should I remove first, if anything? Many thanks, keith whaley Mac OS 10.6.4 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:22:10 +0100, /Hana Skoumalova/:
I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with
displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed
correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to
the right into the text.
I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also
tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they
display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items).
The page showing the problem is at this address:
http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html
Although it looks just o.k. to me, could you try to apply the
following style rule in addition:
li {
clear: both;
}
I can only guess some font differences could cause the floated DTs
to descend below the containing DL/LI so the text in the marker of
the following box (LI) gets shifted. Floats are not as innocent as
they may look and they actually cause most of the problems I've
seen... especially with IE. :-)
--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 3 novembre 2010, Hana Skoumalova a écrit : I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Here both 10 and 13 are shifted to the right! Tested on 2.0.6 then 2.0.10 (your post made me realize I was still using 2.0.6). I use: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fr; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/2.0.10-1.1 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 Maybe you should post your SM string. At home, it is Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 I use these extensions: Adblock Plus, Autofill Forms, DownloadHelper, FlashGot, No Tooltip Timeout, SQLite Manager, and the Mostly Crystal theme. Did you try with a fresh profile? Yes, I did, but it didn't help. Hana ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:22:10 +0100, /Hana Skoumalova/:
I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with
displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed
correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to
the right into the text.
I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also
tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they
display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items).
The page showing the problem is at this address:
http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html
Although it looks just o.k. to me, could you try to apply the following
style rule in addition:
li {
clear: both;
}
This helped. Thank you, Stanimir! First, it looked as a SM's fault, but
now, it seems to be my mistake. I will remeber this.
Hana
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
On 11/3/10 7:42 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/3/10 4:22 AM, Hana Skoumalova wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find any. I also tried other browsers (FF, Google Chrome, FF on XP and IE) and they display the item correctly (or at least the same way as other items). The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 No XHTML errors. No CSS errors. I do not see the problem, either in the list of items at the top or the detailed Q and A below. Further, I see a sublist under the details of item #2, running from 1 to 15; I do not see the problem there. With IE 7, the numbers for the detailed Q and A appear one line above the Q, which is likely not what you want. I suggest you NOT use the dldtdd combination for the Q and A terms. This combination should be used only for defining terms. The Q is not a term to be defined, and the A is not a definition. Furthermore, this combination is supposed to be for a LIST of terms and definitions; but you haved coded a single term and definition for each list. In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ I am again filtering and ignoring all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of the amount of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
David E. Ross wrote: In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All elements should be closed, having an opening tag and a closing tag. If you don't, you would fail Strict validation. pThis is a paragraph./p -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want to upgrade to 2.0xxx
Keith Whaley wrote: I’m on a stable SM 1.1.18 for the Mac now. Is there a recommended way to go directly to the latest v.2.0.10? Or, must I DO it in stages? What should I remove first, if anything? My approach will be: (i am under windowsXP) 1. Stop SM. 2. Copy somewhere the 1.1.18 profile (in case of...) 3. Remove the SM 1.1.18 version 4. Install the SM 2.0.10 5. I think that if you start the SM 2.0.10 for the first time, the profile migration will occur. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Update to the problem Re: Moving profiles from XP to Win7
Zeb Carter wrote: I am in the process of setting up a new computer for a friend of mine - old computer running XP Home, new computer Win 7. Both have SM 2.0.8. I have created duplicate named profiles on the win 7 machine to match the XP machine. Working from a cloned copy of the XP drive, I have tried to copy the contents of the XP machine's profiles to their corresponding counterparts on the Win 7 system. Files are there but SM does not see the information there. In fact, of the 6 profiles, only one is actually working. When I try and open the new profiles, I get the dialogue asking me to create the new mail/news/RSS account(s). What am I doing wrong? I've copied the appropriate files into the proper locations but something is not working. Thanks in advance! Things are not going well. After having tried copying to the appropriate folders, deleting the .msf files, using MozBackup, creating new profiles and copying to them, things are still not working as they should. I still cannot see old mail in the inbox but did manage to get old sent mail working. Help!! Please. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
On 11/3/10 2:26 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David E. Ross wrote: In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All elements should be closed, having an opening tag and a closing tag. If you don't, you would fail Strict validation. pThis is a paragraph./p From the W3C HTML 4.01 specification: 9.3.1 Paragraphs: the P element ... Start tag: required, End tag: optional See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/text.html#h-9.3.1. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ I am again filtering and ignoring all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of the amount of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want to upgrade to 2.0xxx
Ray_Net wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I’m on a stable SM 1.1.18 for the Mac now. Is there a recommended way to go directly to the latest v.2.0.10? Or, must I DO it in stages? What should I remove first, if anything? My approach will be: (i am under windowsXP) 1. Stop SM. 2. Copy somewhere the 1.1.18 profile (in case of...) 3. Remove the SM 1.1.18 version 4. Install the SM 2.0.10 5. I think that if you start the SM 2.0.10 for the first time, the profile migration will occur. The above approach was what I did using Mac OS 10.6.4 I initially went from SM 1.1.18 to SM 2.0.6 without any problems. (Since upgraded to 2.0.10) The profile is now found in Home Folder/Library/Application Support/SeaMonkey M ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem with ol
David E. Ross wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David E. Ross wrote: In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All elements should be closed, having an opening tag and a closing tag. If you don't, you would fail Strict validation. pThis is a paragraph./p From the W3C HTML 4.01 specification: 9.3.1 Paragraphs: the P element ... Start tag: required, End tag: optional See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/text.html#h-9.3.1. Yes, I know what the spec says. But if you don't use closing tags in your coding, it's like trying to read a group of sentences without periods at the end. I did say should be closed, not must. Oh, and if you ever have thoughts about advancing to XHTML or HTML 5, you'll have to reinsert all those closing tags you took out. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
