Composer
Is it possible to sort the tables? If yes, how? Thanks! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
Hello, I set the preferences to require a click to activate plug-ins, but it doesn't work with Flash (it usually works for PDF content), eg: http://www.corriere.it/politica/12_dicembre_11/Berlusconi-che-ci-importa-dello-spread_0f328ec8-4368-11e2-b89b-3cf6075586fe.shtml I do see the plug-in icon and the link to activate, but nothing happens. I also have Flashblock 1.3.18 installed, and it always worked (nad still work on Firefox 17.0.1). So, what's broken ? About Flashblock I now see the last version is 1.5.15.1 , so why SM is not updating my installed release? Gabriel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: render mode
MCBastos wrote: HTML 4.01 Strict is becoming less useful nowadays that most browsers at least recognize the HTML5 header. I respectfully disagree. If your intention is to code to a ratified W3C specification, then HTML 4.01 is your specification of choice; if you want your code to take advantage of bleeding-edge technoology (that allows, for example, Ebay to waste your bandwidth with advertising videos in which you have zero interest), and if you are willing to re-write your page every time the HTML 5 /draft/ specification changes (it is described by the W3C as a work-in-progress), then by all means adopt HTML 5, but don't expect that the page that you write today will necessarily be valid in one year's time. Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
Gabriel wrote: I set the preferences to require a click to activate plug-ins, but it doesn't work with Flash (it usually works for PDF content), eg: http://www.corriere.it/politica/12_dicembre_11/Berlusconi-che-ci-importa-dello-spread_0f328ec8-4368-11e2-b89b-3cf6075586fe.shtml Here it works as expected with the click-to-activate feature on, though the changing focus of the window with even the latest Flash plugin is rather annoying. Sleeky. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: render mode
Philip TAYLOR wrote: don't expect that the page that you write today will necessarily be valid in one year's time. That's why I put a link to the validator on each page, but I failed to realize that the standards could change so fast;-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email Name Liist
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:55:00 -0800, Michael Gordon mgord...@earthlink.net wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: Is there an easy way to change the sequence of email addresses listed in the mail program? I remember that this was a problem a couple years ago and I wonder if something was changed to make it easy. John, What part of the e-mail program are you asking about? The Addressbook? Michael G Not the addressbooks (those with whom I exchange mail) but the names of my own email addresses. I just looked it up - they show in the folder pane on the left side (via F9). All my addresses show there including all the subfolders I set up for separating mail via Message Filters. (FWIW; XP SM 2.14.1) I recently added a new address and it appears at the bottom of the list. I'd like to move it up to near the top and I'm looking for an easy way to do that. -- JohnW-Mpls ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: render mode
Rick Merrill wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: don't expect that the page that you write today will necessarily be valid in one year's time. That's why I put a link to the validator on each page, but I failed to realize that the standards could change so fast;-) Those validator links aren't something any of your visitors will be interested in, and may even be confusing to them. Better would be for you to install a tool so you can readily validate for yourself. Install Chris Pederick's Web Developer Toolbar and it's just a couple of clicks away. http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/ -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: render mode
Rick Merrill wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: don't expect that the page that you write today will necessarily be valid in one year's time. That's why I put a link to the validator on each page, but I failed to realize that the standards could change so fast;-) The problem is (and this is not something that is widely appreciated), HTML 5 is /not/ a standard. It may become one, it may not; at the moment it is a draft specification, a work-in-progress : it has not been afforded the W3C seal of approval by becoming a formal recommendation, unlike HTML 4.01 and related specifications. As the W3C HTML 5 page proudly trumpets : This is a work in progress! For the latest updates from the HTML WG, possibly including important bug fixes, please look at the editor's draft instead. whereas under W3C HTML Specifications we read : Specifications HTML HTML+ ~July 1993 HTML 2.0, RFC 1866, November 1995, Tim Berners Lee, Dan Connolly HTML 3.2, W3C Recommendation, 14 January 1997, Dave Raggett, Author HTML 4.01, W3C Recommendation, 24 December 1999, Dave Raggett, Arnaud Le Hors, Ian Jacobs, Editors XHTML XHTML 1.0, W3C Recommendation, revised 1 August 2002, Steven Pemberton, et al., Authors XHTML™ 1.1 - Module-based XHTML, W3C Recommendation, 31 May 2001, Murray Altheim, Shane McCarron, Editors Future of HTML and XHTML HTML5, a work in progress, intends to replace HTML 3.2, HTML 4, and XHTML 1.x. Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
On 12/12/12 3:42 AM, Gabriel wrote: [snipped] About Flashblock I now see the last version is 1.5.15.1 , so why SM is not updating my installed release? Gabriel The latest Flashblock version for SeaMonkey at is 1.3.19. Flashblock 1.5.15.1 is for Firefox. The two browsers require different versions. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Composer
Agnes wrote: Is it possible to sort the tables? If yes, how? Thanks! Sorry but I think you are out of luck. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Composer
Agnes wrote: Is it possible to sort the tables? If yes, how? Thanks! Agnes, Not that I am aware of, Composer was created to make data holding elements (like tables, cells, rows, columns, and CSS controlled boxes.) You will need to find one of two solutions: 1. a database, or spreadsheet that can sort within its own application, and then export the results in HTML coded tables. (The last I read Microsoft can do very well on creating web standards coding, they have hteir own proprietary coding cor Office products.) 2. A CGI program you can install on your web server that can import data records and fields and sort on the fly, and can write standards HTML code for the data elements (cells, rows, columns, etc.) Michael G -- Armadillo Web Development www.armadilloweb.com Cell: 903.244.3644 Opening your Door to Opportunity and inviting the world to walk through. Character is doing the right thing... Even when no one is watching... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Composer
A Williams wrote: Agnes wrote: Is it possible to sort the tables? If yes, how? Thanks! Sorry but I think you are out of luck. /What/ tables ? If data tables, why not copy them into Excel, sort them there and then paste them back again ? Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email Name Liist
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:55:00 -0800, Michael Gordon mgord...@earthlink.net wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: Is there an easy way to change the sequence of email addresses listed in the mail program? I remember that this was a problem a couple years ago and I wonder if something was changed to make it easy. John, What part of the e-mail program are you asking about? The Addressbook? Michael G Not the addressbooks (those with whom I exchange mail) but the names of my own email addresses. I just looked it up - they show in the folder pane on the left side (via F9). All my addresses show there including all the subfolders I set up for separating mail via Message Filters. (FWIW; XP SM 2.14.1) I recently added a new address and it appears at the bottom of the list. I'd like to move it up to near the top and I'm looking for an easy way to do that. John, I now understand your question, you are asking about your mail account names in the left panel. Yes there is a way to change the order in which these appear in the Accounts Panel. You could edit your profile, but that is not an easy task, you can install an extension for SeaMonkey where you can custom set your accounts with a few clicks. Take a look a Folder Pane and be sure you download and install the correct version for your mail Verizon. Read the instructions for setting the various attributes. I have it and it works very well. http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#folderpanetools Michael G -- Armadillo Web Development www.armadilloweb.com Cell: 903.244.3644 Opening your Door to Opportunity and inviting the world to walk through. Character is doing the right thing... Even when no one is watching... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Composer
Michael Gordon wrote: (The last I read Microsoft can do very well on creating web standards coding, ... Wherever did you read that? A Microsoft page, perhaps? It is well known that Microsoft follows their own web standards and is why you so often see special IE sections of code in web pages: workarounds for MS non- standard idiosyncrasies. they have hteir own proprietary coding cor Office products.) ..which trumps your very well statement above. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
On 12/12/12 17.38, David E. Ross ha scritto: On 12/12/12 3:42 AM, Gabriel wrote: [snipped] About Flashblock I now see the last version is 1.5.15.1 , so why SM is not updating my installed release? Gabriel The latest Flashblock version for SeaMonkey at is 1.3.19. Flashblock 1.5.15.1 is for Firefox. The two browsers require different versions. You're right, still SM didn't auto update my Flashblock to 1.3.19 (I did it manually). Gabriel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
On 12/12/12 13.46, Sleeky ha scritto: Gabriel wrote: I set the preferences to require a click to activate plug-ins, but it doesn't work with Flash (it usually works for PDF content), eg: http://www.corriere.it/politica/12_dicembre_11/Berlusconi-che-ci-importa-dello-spread_0f328ec8-4368-11e2-b89b-3cf6075586fe.shtml Here it works as expected with the click-to-activate feature on, though the changing focus of the window with even the latest Flash plugin is rather annoying. What version of SM are you using? My build is User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15 Build identifier: 20121206083934 It dosn't work even for YouTube, eg: http://youtu.be/6sufNXgsUxY I will try deactivating Flashblock. Gabriel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
On 12/12/12 9:31 AM, Gabriel wrote: On 12/12/12 13.46, Sleeky ha scritto: Gabriel wrote: I set the preferences to require a click to activate plug-ins, but it doesn't work with Flash (it usually works for PDF content), eg: http://www.corriere.it/politica/12_dicembre_11/Berlusconi-che-ci-importa-dello-spread_0f328ec8-4368-11e2-b89b-3cf6075586fe.shtml Here it works as expected with the click-to-activate feature on, though the changing focus of the window with even the latest Flash plugin is rather annoying. What version of SM are you using? My build is User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15 Build identifier: 20121206083934 It dosn't work even for YouTube, eg: http://youtu.be/6sufNXgsUxY I will try deactivating Flashblock. Gabriel SeaMOnkey 2.15 has not yet been released for end users. There have been a number of problems with the implementation of click-to-play. See bug #738698 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738698. This is a tracking bug for such problems. It is currently dependent on 36 open bugs for specific problems, including #736998 and #785836 (links available at #738698), which are specific to Flash. See also the related tracking bug #774937 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774937. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mbox handling messed up in SeaMonkey 2.14?
Philip TAYLOR p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: Rob wrote: Ok, I just wanted to note that there have been and maybe there still are some problems with IMAP accounts. Sometimes attachments appear to be corrupted, even when settings are such that there is no offline store. It does not happen all the time and it is difficult to get a grip on. Exchange 2010 server ? Philip Taylor No. There have been reports from users with several IMAP servers. I have seen this myself on UW IMAPD. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: render mode
Interviewed by CNN on 12/12/2012 10:14, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: HTML 4.01 Strict is becoming less useful nowadays that most browsers at least recognize the HTML5 header. I respectfully disagree. If your intention is to code to a ratified W3C specification, then HTML 4.01 is your specification of choice; if you want your code to take advantage of bleeding-edge technoology (that allows, for example, Ebay to waste your bandwidth with advertising videos in which you have zero interest), and if you are willing to re-write your page every time the HTML 5 /draft/ specification changes (it is described by the W3C as a work-in-progress), then by all means adopt HTML 5, but don't expect that the page that you write today will necessarily be valid in one year's time. You do have a point, but the reality of the Web is that developers seldom restrict themselves to stable, ratified standards. And, while there are a lot of experimental stuff being done under the HTML5 banner which are still in flux, and indeed are subject to change at any time, there are features which are quite stable and enjoy very wide support among user-agents. My point was not that 4.01 strict is useless; I did not say that. It was that it lost some of its usefulness, because even if you are *not* using bleeding-edge stuff, using an HTML5 declaration gives you some convenience and loses very little, if anything. For instance, some elements were deprecated in HTML4 but brought back in HTML5. So, you have basically three choices regarding them: - Use them, declare as Transitional and trigger Quirks mode; - Not use them (working around them by essentially recreating the same functionality in CSS), which is more work, and declare as Strict, getting Standards mode; - Or use them, declare as HTML5 and get Strict mode. Essentially, you get to have your cake and eat it too. Yes, people using very old browsers (IE 6 and the like) may have some problems with pages declared as HTML5. But then, those old browsers will have problems with just about *anything* you throw them that hasn't been specifically checked for stupid-bugs-compatibility. If you don't mind breaking compatibility with middlin'-old browsers then you also get to use some of the more established and stable features of HTML5. These haven't been substantially changed in quite a while. In some cases, the traditional alternatives are simply no good. For instance, Flash is going away; it was never available on iOS, it's being phased out on other mobile platforms and, I think, Linux, and I wouldn't give it more than a couple years on Mac and Windows either. So if you want to embed video, the most widely supported option is HTML5 video (well, you still have to encode it twice, once with H.264, once with WebM... but it works in most platforms). It's not a ratified standard, but it's the closest thing to one we have *ever* had. Flash was never a standard, neither were RealVideo, WindowsMedia or QuickTime. Being conservative when adopting HTML5 features is probably a very good idea; but eschewing it altogether while waiting for final ratification (which admittedly might take more than ten years) is not. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Nintendo Game Boy. * Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.14.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Composer
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: (The last I read Microsoft can do very well on creating web standards coding, ... Wherever did you read that? A Microsoft page, perhaps? It is well known that Microsoft follows their own web standards and is why you so often see special IE sections of code in web pages: workarounds for MS non- standard idiosyncrasies. they have hteir own proprietary coding cor Office products.) ..which trumps your very well statement above. Older versions of Internet Exploder were very non-standard. Newer versions (the last thing read implies newer) are apparently a lot better. Having said that, my experience is limited but I have yet to see a version of Excel which produces decent html. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: render mode
MCBastos wrote: Being conservative when adopting HTML5 features is probably a very good idea; but eschewing it altogether while waiting for final ratification (which admittedly might take more than ten years) is not. I hear your arguments, I recognise their merit, but I also continue to disagree. That said, this is not the correct forum within which to debate such issues, so I will say no more on this subject (except, perhaps, that bringing back elements that were quite correctly deprecated in HTML 4.01 is more about pragmatism that it is about semantic markup, and is, to my mind, a clear indication of the driving forces that lie behind HTML 5). Philip Taylor ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Composer
A Williams wrote: Having said that, my experience is limited but I have yet to see a version of Excel which produces decent html. I remember the answer to the question What are the worst HTML editors? as being, in order: 1. Microsoft Publisher, 2. Microsoft Excel, 3. Microsoft Word, and 4. Microsoft FrontPage.:-) -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
memory leak in SeaMonkey 2.14 for linux x64?
I recently noticed that my system was slowing down a bit, so I took a look at what my resource manager was showing. Memory seemed to be tight, so I took a look and found that SM 2.14 was using almost 1G of memory! I shut it down, which took several seconds and restarted it. That reduced its memory usage to about 400M. Does this suggest a memory leak somewhere? I am running Linux Mint 11 Katya x64 edition on this laptop. SM is: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14 Build identifier: 20121123160306 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
2.14.1 64 bit Linux fails with Lightning
I know, not supported, not official, has been working. Will fall back until it works again. Events list comes up, but attempts to add items fail. http://webster.tmr.com/~davidsen/Lightning-ng.png Permissions and ownership checked, and I know it's not supported, just reporting. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com Running in a test environment ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Clear cache ??
WaltS wrote: On 12/05/2012 03:15 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: WaltS wrote: How do you bypass the domain-masking frame? Right-click / This frame / Shew only this frame. Or, as I did because I was looking at the source, see that it's in a frame and go direct to the real URL from there. :-) I looked at the source, but missed the real URL. So I have to read source code now, to know if I am on the real URL? Why wasn't I redirected automagically? Think about that a minute... Refresh happens when the current page changes, or you do a forced manual reload. Since the page you were viewing didn't change, there was no way to know that the link target changed. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com Running in a test environment ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.14.1 64 bit Linux fails with Lightning
On 12/12/2012 01:25 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: I know, not supported, not official, has been working. Will fall back until it works again. Events list comes up, but attempts to add items fail. http://webster.tmr.com/~davidsen/Lightning-ng.png Permissions and ownership checked, and I know it's not supported, just reporting. It would be helpful if you tell us which version of Lightning you are talking about... Lighting 1.9 works fine for me with: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Build identifier: 20121129230834 My SeaMonkey is run from a home directory. You appear to be running from a system-wide install (/usr/local)? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: memory leak in SeaMonkey 2.14 for linux x64?
On 12/12/2012 12:53 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: I recently noticed that my system was slowing down a bit, so I took a look at what my resource manager was showing. Memory seemed to be tight, so I took a look and found that SM 2.14 was using almost 1G of memory! I shut it down, which took several seconds and restarted it. That reduced its memory usage to about 400M. Does this suggest a memory leak somewhere? I am running Linux Mint 11 Katya x64 edition on this laptop. SM is: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14 Build identifier: 20121123160306 Yup. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Build identifier: 20121129230834 From about:memory Main Process Explicit Allocations 913.39 MB (100.0%) -- explicit ├──472.87 MB (51.77%) ── heap-unclassified ├──301.04 MB (32.96%) -- window-objects Other Measurements 416 (100.0%) -- js-compartments ├──358 (86.06%) ── system └───58 (13.94%) ── user 260.56 MB (100.0%) -- js-main-runtime ├──230.57 MB (88.49%) -- compartments ... htop is showing 2085M virtual, 997M resident. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: memory leak in SeaMonkey 2.14 for linux x64?
NoOp wrote: On 12/12/2012 12:53 PM, David H. Durgee wrote: I recently noticed that my system was slowing down a bit, so I took a look at what my resource manager was showing. Memory seemed to be tight, so I took a look and found that SM 2.14 was using almost 1G of memory! I shut it down, which took several seconds and restarted it. That reduced its memory usage to about 400M. Does this suggest a memory leak somewhere? I am running Linux Mint 11 Katya x64 edition on this laptop. SM is: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14 Build identifier: 20121123160306 Yup. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Build identifier: 20121129230834 From about:memory Main Process Explicit Allocations 913.39 MB (100.0%) -- explicit ├──472.87 MB (51.77%) ── heap-unclassified ├──301.04 MB (32.96%) -- window-objects Other Measurements 416 (100.0%) -- js-compartments ├──358 (86.06%) ── system └───58 (13.94%) ── user 260.56 MB (100.0%) -- js-main-runtime ├──230.57 MB (88.49%) -- compartments ... htop is showing 2085M virtual, 997M resident. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17a1 Build identifier: 20121209074029 Main Process Explicit Allocations 301.39 MB (100.0%) -- explicit ├───92.82 MB (30.80%) ── heap-unclassified ├───67.67 MB (22.45%) -- window-objects Other Measurements 291 (100.0%) -- js-compartments ├──277 (95.19%) ── system └───14 (04.81%) ── user 143.29 MB (100.0%) -- js-main-runtime ├──121.42 MB (84.73%) -- compartments Virtual 992M resident 401M Things are getting better ;-) -- Carbon: Father of the elements. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Did Seamonkey Window behavior change?
PhillipJones wrote: brianb...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a general issue with Adobe ? I have just downloaded Ver 2.13 and then 2.14 of Seamonkey and Adobe does not function. I will try an earlier version of Adobe as well. Additionally Seamonkey often stalls when attempting to download a 2nd page of data after requesting a new URL. Running windows 7 I just off the Chat with acrobat. Its seem adobe hasn't sought fit to have a working PDFviewer Plugin for FireFox or SeaMonkey. Suggest you uninstall Adobe and try Sumatra PDF http://blog.kowalczyk.info/software/sumatrapdf/free-pdf-reader.html I got rid of a lot of problems by uninstalling Adobe. No more update spam, needless clutter, conflicts, etc. etc. IMHO the Adobe product is vastly over rated. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click to activate plug-in : doesn't work for Flash content (SM 2.15b3)
Gabriel wrote: What version of SM are you using? SM 2.14.1, the latest stable version. Regards, Sleeky ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
