Re: SeaMonkey v.2.49.4 and Kaspersky Internet Security 2019

[Christian Riechers]

On 12/31/18 7:00 PM, Henrik37 wrote:
> Henrik37 wrote:
>> When my license for Kaspersky Internet Security (KIS) recently
>> expired, I installed KIS 2019.  As many SM users already know, there
>> has been some incompatibility between SM and KIS for several years -
>> mostly (in my experience) involving security certificate data bases. 
>> My solution to this problem has been to retain the current KIS license
>> but revert to KIS 2015.
>>
>> In trying to make KIS 2019 work, I queried Kaspersky Support.  They
>> sent me instructions for inserting a KIS 19 certificate into FireFox
>> (FF). These instructions don't seem very useful as SM and FF have
>> become quite different - as I understand it.
>>
>> Has anyone else had this SM/KIS security certificate incompatibility
>> problem?  How was the problem solved?
>>
>> Alternatively, would it be worth my trying to replace the security
>> certificate file in SM v.2.49.4 with the KIS 2019 security certificate
>> file?  If so, where is the SM 2.49.4 security certificate file located?
>>
>> I see a 'cert8.db' entry in the 'Mozilla' folder that has the same
>> date as when I installed KIS 2019.  If it sounds like I am pretty much
>> confused, I am.  I am 81 years old and haven't been up-to-date on
>> software construction in years and didn't know all that much to start
>> with.
>>
>> All help will be useful and much appreciated.
>  Many, many, thanks to both gentlemen for the good advice.  Problem solved.

Congratulations. You just gave Kaspersky permissions to read all your
encrypted communication when using Seamonkey. That includes every
password you send to a server to login to a web site. I'd hope you do
have a lot of faith in Kaspersky.

Also see https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/error-codes-secure-websites
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lastpass 3

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/29/2017 11:06 AM, Richmond wrote:
> I see some security issue is being fixed in lastpass, but also that
> lastpass will be phasing out version 3. Is there a way to get 4 in SM?
> Is this due to the new web extension standard?

Exactly right.
https://blog.lastpass.com/2017/03/plans-to-retire-the-lastpass-3-3-2-firefox-add-on.html/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: less secure apps

[Christian Riechers]

On 04/16/2016 12:05 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
> Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian Riechers/:
>> For Thunderbird OAuth2 only works for the gmail.com and googlemail.com
>> domains.
> 
> Doesn't appear true given my later comment.

I probably should have been more specific.
OAuth2 can be selected as Authentication Method within Account Settings
when the server domain name is either gmail.com or googlemail.com.
This goes for IMAP and SMTP servers only.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: less secure apps

[Christian Riechers]

On 04/16/2016 10:33 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
> Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:16:29 -0500, »Q« wrote:
>> In ,
>> Rick Merrill  wrote:
>>> I have not heard of  OAuth 2.0 - an open standard - is it not
>>> compatible with seamonkey?
>>
>> I don't know.  According to
>> , Thunderbird has
>> supports it as of v. 38, so maybe it's coming to SeaMonkey.
> 
> I've tried changing the Server Settings / Authentication method of my
> Gmail account (in SeaMonkey) to "OAuth2", and the first time I've tried
> to open the Inbox I've been presented with a web form (in a new window)
> to log in.  Then I've been able to use my account from SeaMonkey just
> like before, even when I've set my Google account to not allow "less
> secure apps".

With OAuth2 "less secure apps" don't need to be allowed.

> This appears o.k. but then I've found I'm not able to do the same with
> my company account, which is also provided by Google but using a
> dedicated domain name (the company domain).  For some reason my username
> in the OAuth2 login form is always changed to @gmail.com,
> rather than using @ which appears to break the
> whole thing.

For Thunderbird OAuth2 only works for the gmail.com and googlemail.com
domains.

> It's interesting that a colleague of mine using
> Thunderbird doesn't experience the same, and is now using OAuth2 for
> accessing his company account from withing Thunderbird.

Why don't you ask your colleague?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Gmail not permitted?

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/13/2016 04:58 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Christian Riechers wrote:
>> On 03/12/2016 10:40 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>> Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote:
>>>> Similar, but not exactly that reason. Google is promoting its own
>>>> protocol for authentications, on the basis that the current scheme of
>>>> login + password is flawed. It may or may not be true (I read it some
>>>> time ago, and I don't really like it too much). The protocol is not
>>>> closed (Google is, AFAIK, not asking for money for sites or services
>>>> wanting to use it), so it is more like Google wants to be recognized
>>>> for being the author of a critical shift in how services authenticate.
>>>
>>> What protocol?
>>
>> OAuth2
> 
> For web browser authorization. Again, for a mail client? Not a push for
> their webmail portal?

Thunderbird has implemented OAuth2 authentication for Gmail IMAP and
SMTP since v38.
The benefit is that one doesn't need to jump through hoops anymore and
allow 'less secure' apps for Gmail.
I don't know about Seamonkey.

> <https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1039130>

That post is more than a year old.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Gmail not permitted?

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/12/2016 10:40 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote:
>> Similar, but not exactly that reason. Google is promoting its own
>> protocol for authentications, on the basis that the current scheme of
>> login + password is flawed. It may or may not be true (I read it some
>> time ago, and I don't really like it too much). The protocol is not
>> closed (Google is, AFAIK, not asking for money for sites or services
>> wanting to use it), so it is more like Google wants to be recognized
>> for being the author of a critical shift in how services authenticate.
> 
> What protocol?

OAuth2

> Currently using SSL/StartTLS,

In this context SSL/TLS has got nothing to do with the way you
authenticate to your Gmail account.

> do you mean TLS 1.0? IIRC

No.

> Mozilla tried disabling it by default, but it broke too many websites so
> folk could do things like online banking... Or is this some special
> protocol where Chrome takes a DNS sample? ;-)

It is scary how you arbitrarily throw in new terms completely out of
context.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Sudden problem with Yahoo mail

[Christian Riechers]

On 04/13/2014 06:16 PM, Paul wrote:
 WaltS48 wrote:
 On 04/13/2014 11:13 AM, Paul wrote:

snip

 Yahoo redid their Certificate due to the Heartbleed bug.
 You can either use non ssl mail or get their new certificate.

 How may one get that new certificate?

You get the cert when accessing the server via SSL/TLS.

 I misspoke. 

Indeed.

 We users don't get the actual certificate, we just access
 and confirm the website that uses it.

Then how do you think your browser can verify the cert if you don't get it?

 In the past I have had to rename
 cert8.db in the Windows Mozilla folder, start SM and then go to the
 website in question.
 A new cert8.db was created using the latest certificate info which
 solved the problem.

That is the troubleshooting procedure in case your certificate store got
corrupted. There is no point deleting cert8.db in order to get a new
cert from Yahoo.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Filter Creation Broke

[Christian Riechers]

On 04/13/2014 04:43 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
 Geoff Welsh wrote:
 PhillipJones wrote:
 Philip Taylor wrote:
 PhillipJones wrote:
 (I'm on Beta Channel)

 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  If it's Fixed, Don't Break it

 Practise what you preach ?  :-)

 I try to. I update to 26.1 beta only for security reasons.
 I had to revert back to 25.0 beta  because of this major problem
 ..

 Forgive my ignorance of the hacking world, but how is a Beta of any
 software more secure than stable version?
 
 Even Beta Channel versions go through security updates They are no less
 secure than regular versions. They are just tinkering with the code to
 add features or make more efficient.

But reverting to 25.0 beta after 25.0 has been released is a silly idea.

-- 
Christian

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Filter Creation Broke

[Christian Riechers]

On 04/13/2014 07:01 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
 On 04/13/2014 12:53 PM, Christian Riechers wrote:
 On 04/13/2014 04:43 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
 Geoff Welsh wrote:
 PhillipJones wrote:
 Philip Taylor wrote:
 PhillipJones wrote:
 (I'm on Beta Channel)

 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  If it's Fixed, Don't Break it

 Practise what you preach ?  :-)

 I try to. I update to 26.1 beta only for security reasons.
 I had to revert back to 25.0 beta  because of this major problem
 ..

 Forgive my ignorance of the hacking world, but how is a Beta of any
 software more secure than stable version?

 Even Beta Channel versions go through security updates They are no less
 secure than regular versions. They are just tinkering with the code to
 add features or make more efficient.

 But reverting to 25.0 beta after 25.0 has been released is a silly idea.
 
 I'm on 29.0b7. Are you referring to SeaMonkey 2.25? AFAIK there is no 25
 or 26.

My bad. Seamonkey 2.25 beta and 2.26 beta respectively. I guess that's
what Phillip was talking about.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why is SeaMonkey refusing to connect to NON secure page saying not trusted cert?

[Christian Riechers]

On 01/26/2014 03:18 AM, Desiree wrote:
 Both SeaMonkey 2.23 and Fx 24.2.0 refuse to connect to a NONsecure site
 claiming the site is https and claiming invalid cert. Both browsers
 refuse to let me look at the cert and make a security exception if I
 wish. (I should not need to make any exception because the site is not
 secure in the first place but Fx and SM think it is).  The site is
 http://www.tvfool.com.  I can use both IE 10 and Opera 12.15 with no
 problems at the site and no matter which pages I access at the site
 neither IE or Opera claim the page is a secure one.
 
 So, why does SM think the site is https?  Secondly, why is SM (and Fx)
 not allowing me to examine the cert? (If this was a secure site,
 probably the cert might be from an authority that I list in my browsers
 as untrusted because I want to make an individual decision (after
 being notified which authority the site is using and examining the cert)
 for any sites using certs from certain authorities.
 
 Also, on sites that are secure, where the certifying authority is listed
 by me in SeaMonkey (and Fx) as untrusted, and I make an exception and
 click the box to make the exception permanent, why is that never
 remembered? It used to be remembered if I checked the box to make the
 exception permanent for a specific site.  IE and Opera have no
 difficulty remembering exceptions so what happened recently to Fx and SM
 to make them unable to remember permanent exceptions made by the user?
 
 http://i.imgur.com/DmXmtl5.png
 
 I am trying to go to this specific page (which SM and Fx mistakenly
 think is a secure page but is not):
 
 http://www.tvfool.com/index.php?option=com_wrapperItemid=29
 
 Note (on the above screen shot) the lack of any way to make a security
 exception for this supposed secure page.

It works fine here with FF. Even though the site isn't a https site,
there probably is some content sent encrypted. The browser requests a
certificate for www.tvfool.com. The actual certificate is:
*.tvfool.com

issuer
 Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority

which is issued by
 Go Daddy Class 2 CA

You don't see this normally, because it's all happening in the
background. But an add-on like Certificate Patrol makes it visible to
the user, and allows access to all stored server certificates.

I guess the reason for not being prompted for the exception is because
the site isn't https in the first place.
The reason for getting the error is possibly a corrupted certificate
store of your SM installation.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.23 New Mail account Wizard

[Christian Riechers]

On 01/21/2014 01:24 AM, David Guymer wrote:
 This wizard points to a point where it wants to edit an existing news
 account and does not ask if news or email.
 
 David Guymer

It probably helps reading the release notes.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.23/#issues

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Restore sessions from SSL web pages like Webmails?

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/08/2013 06:09 AM, Ant wrote:

On 3/7/2013 2:48 PM PT, Christian Riechers typed:


I just noticed secured webmails are restored with logged in (assuming
not logged off/out) if my Mozilla's Gecko-based web browsers (SeaMonkey
v2.16 and Firefox v19.0 in Windows [XP Pro. SP3, and 64-bit Vista HPE
SP2 and W7 EE SP1) is restarted with sessions saved.

Is this by design? Thank you in advance. :)


I think it is. What's the value of the pref
browser.sessionstore.privacy_level in your FF/SM?

See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.sessionstore.privacy_level


Thanks. 0 in my SM. I thought it was interesting that caches don't keep
data through SSL connections, but does for sessions.


You'd need to set it to 2 to forget the session after restart. Highly 
recommended.


--
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Restore sessions from SSL web pages like Webmails?

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/07/2013 08:12 PM, Ant wrote:

Hello!

I just noticed secured webmails are restored with logged in (assuming
not logged off/out) if my Mozilla's Gecko-based web browsers (SeaMonkey
v2.16 and Firefox v19.0 in Windows [XP Pro. SP3, and 64-bit Vista HPE
SP2 and W7 EE SP1) is restarted with sessions saved.

Is this by design? Thank you in advance. :)


I think it is. What's the value of the pref 
browser.sessionstore.privacy_level in your FF/SM?


See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.sessionstore.privacy_level

--
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.13 Problems.

[Christian Riechers]

On 10/10/2012 04:25 PM, LR wrote:

On Oct 10, 10:10 am, LR lr...@superlink.net wrote:

I just installed 2.13 and I'm having some trouble loading some sites.


Another problem.

I tried to use email and 2.13 doesn't seem to remember my old accounts
and is asking me to set up new ones.

Suggestions?

LR


The article is for TB, but should apply to SM as well.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Recovering_a_profile_that_suddenly_disappeared

--
Christian

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mozilla/Firefox Sync issues...

[Christian Riechers]

On 05/24/2012 05:00 PM, MCBastos wrote:
 An annoyance. I recently decided to give a try to the new native-UI beta
 version of Firefox for Android. (By the way, yes, it IS very very fast,
 and it looks very nice...)
 
 Since all my bookmarks are in Sync, being shared between Seamonkey,
 desktop Firefox, portable Seamonkey and the old XUL-interface Android
 Firefox, I added this new one to Sync...
 
 Apparently the bookmarks engine in the new Portable Firefox has some
 bugs. First, it sorted all my bookmarks alphabetically. That wouldn't
 have been TOO bad, most of them are sorted anyway. But...
 
 ...it doesn't seem to consider separator boundaries when sorting. For
 instance, I have a bookmark folder with the links for several webcomics.
 They are separated thematically; computer/geek strips in one group,
 general-interest strips in another... if I tell desktop
 Firefox/Seamonkey to sort the folder, it treats each group as a separate
 sorting domain, and sorts the bookmars *inside* the group without mixing
 the group.
 
 The new Mobile Firefox did something very weird: it apparently ignored
 the separators for sorting purposes, but left them in place anyway. So
 if I had a list like this (female names in a group, male names in
 another group):
 
 Alice Eve Mallory Peggy | Bob Charlie Dave Trent Walter
 
 It would sort the folder like this:
 
 Alice Bob Charlie Dave | Eve Mallory Peggy Trent Walter
 
 ...keeping the separator between the fourth and fifth bookmarks. Which
 does not help at all, of course.
 
 I have been fixing my bookmarks list by hand... I just hope this is a
 first-sync issue only, and it won't mess everything again next time I
 use Mobile Firefox.

My experience with Sync on FF for Android has been rather negative so
far. It's not reliable, it's slow to propagate updates to other
instances, it doesn't work consistently.
Therefore I only use it to carry my desktop bookmarks to the phone via a
SM test profile on the desktop machine.
I don't want it to screw up my bookmarks in the production profile,
which I have no doubt it would manage to do.
You may find this article interesting, it gives some background
information on the implementation.
http://www.morbo.org/2012/05/history-and-bookmarks-in-firefox-for.html
Sync on FF for Android certainly isn't a trivial thing to get right, but
it isn't ready for prime time yet in my view.

-- 
Christian

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

[Christian Riechers]

On 05/12/2012 05:24 AM, NoOp wrote:
 On 05/08/2012 06:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
 Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
 1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
 the same systems with:

 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox/15.0a1
 (Firefox Nightly)
 Chromium: 18.0.1025.168 (Developer Build 134367 Linux) Ubuntu 11.04
 Ephipany Web Browser 2.30.6

 Other applications:
 LibreOffice 3.5.3.2
 LibreOffice 3.4.6

 Java 7u4 is not working on SeaMonkey
 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120429
 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1
 on either system. If Java is backed down to 6u32 then SeaMonkey (and
 Prefbar 6.1 - Ping Manuel) pick it up fine. Tested using
 http://java.com|Do I have Java?

 SeaMonkey  Firefox Java plugin path:
 Java(TM) Plug-in 1.7.0_04
 File: /opt/java/32/jre1.7.0_04/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so

 Also tested:
 o Clean 'test' profiles (created new SM profiles and did not use any
 existing profiles).
 o Prefbar 6.1 on Firefox - no issues, so I tested with the existing
 SeaMonkey profiles with Prefbar turned off/on/uninstalled/newly reinstalled.
 o Windows SM 2.9.1 versions + Java 7_4: WinXP  Win7  all work fine.
 o SeaMonkey 2.9.0 - no change.

 No Java related files exist in ~/.mozilla. All versions of Firefox,
 Firefox Nightlies, and SeaMonkey are run from ~/seamonkey (user home
 directories). pluginreg.dat in SeaMonkey shows:

 [INVALID]
 /opt/java/32/jre1.7.0_04/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so:$
 1334223796000:$

 Whereas pluginreg.dat in Firefox shows:

 libnpjp2.so:$
 /opt/java/32/jre1.7.0_04/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so:$
 :$
 1334223796000:0:5:$
 a href=http://java.sun.com;Java/a plug-in for NPAPI-based browsers.:$
 Java(TM) Plug-in 1.7.0_04:$
 36
 0:application/x-java-vm:Java#153 Plug-in::$
 1:application/x-java-applet:Java#153 Plug-in Applet::$
 etc.

 Note: I've renamed pluginreg.dat in SeaMonkey  let SM rebuild the data
 - result is the same.

 Anyone else experiencing the same/similar?

 Added note: mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey is also copied on this msg. I've
 set the followup-to mozilla.support.seamonkey.

 Nobody else? Anyone else (linux) have sun java jre1.7.0_04 installed and
 set as the default java? Again, in Firefox it works fine, in SeaMonkey
 (even with a clean test profile) it does not. *And* with the default
 profile  prefbar 6.1 installed, prefbar declares No Java Plugin
 found!. I suspect it may be a path problem as the same prefbar 6.1
 works just fine in Firefox (I even copy the 6.1 profile to Firefox to test.

I do see the exact same behavior here with OpenSuSE 11.4.
Java 1.7.0_04 works fine with both, FF12 and FF13 beta, but does not
work with SM 2.9.1. I also have the [invalid] section in pluginreg.dat.
Java doesn't even show up in the Add-on manager under plugins.
I haven't noticed before, since I don't use SM often, and Java is
disabled most of the time anyway.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey Help is back…with screencasts!

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/30/2012 11:21 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
 I've finished updating http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/!
 
 Aside from content now being up to date, the big change is that it is
 mostly screencasts. I've written a blog post about it at
 http://ilias.ca/blog/2012/03/seamonkey-help-is-back-with-screencasts/.
 

With both, Seamonkey 2.8 and FF 12 beta 3 on Linux I do get this error
message on the home page:
The screencasts on this site use HTML5 video in WebM format. Make sure
you have SeaMonkey 2.1 or higher, or one of the supported browsers.
The webcasts are working though.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: html5 demo

[Christian Riechers]

On 08/10/2011 11:11 AM, Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Do you see something?
 
 http://robhawkes.github.com/webgl-html5-audio-visualiser/
 
 
 I only see a black screen with Seamonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5!
 
 
 I'm on Linux xUbuntu 11.04
 

Have you set the pref for the path to your Mesa library?
In about:config filter for 'webgl.osmesalib'. Mine is set to
'/usr/lib/libOSMesa.so'.
It works for me using FF6 on Linux. You may also need to allow WebGL in
Noscript, in case that is installed.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cant see videos

[Christian Riechers]

On 05/07/2011 08:29 PM, FDVS wrote:
 Here is some more data.
 In SM, when I click this link (it's a moving graphic of the building of
 the international space station) I get a message saying I need to
 install the latest Flash player.  So I download it and then close SM,
 install the player.
 Reopen SM and try the link again.  I get the same warning as if it does
 not recognize the AF player I just installed.
 
 However the link does work in IE on same laptop.
 WinXP
 SM 2.0.14
 Thanks
 Dave
 the link:
 
 http://i.usatoday.net/tech/graphics/iss_timeline/flash.htm
 

There are different Windows versions of Flash Player for IE and other
browsers.
Make sure you download the right one for other browsers from the Adobe
web site.
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/
Once installed make sure Flash is visible in the Plugins section of the
Add-ons Manager. The current Flash version is 10.2.159.1.
I like the Space Station animation. It plays fine here in FF 4.0.1 and
Seamonkey 2.1b3 under Linux.

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Does Seamonkey use latest Firefox engine?

[Christian Riechers]

On 03/27/2011 12:38 PM, Stereotactic wrote:
 
 
 On 03/27/2011 03:42 PM, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
 On 2011-03-27, Stereotactic wrote:

 On 03/27/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
 Seamonkey 2.0 ~ Thunderbird 3.0 + Firefox 3.5

 Seamonkey 2.1 ~ Thunderbird 3.3 + Firefox 4.0
 Where can I download the latest build? Does this have a ppa for Ubuntu
 10.10? I'd be more than happy to report bugs and assist around here on
 the lists.
 http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey/2.1b2/

 is running fine here in Debian squeeze and wheezy (i386).
 Am talking about the latest build based on Gecko. The link doesn't work
 either :(
 Regards,

 Howard E.

 

http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b2/

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Synchronizing bookmarks -- Seamonkey and Firefox

[Christian Riechers]

On 01/23/2011 03:10 PM, jim wrote:
 Seamonkey 2.04
 Firefox 3.6.13
 
 I have a situation where my bookmarks are pretty well diverged now.  They
 used to be synchronized when they both used html files but have not been
 for several years.
 
 I have seamonkey bookmarks that aren't in firefox and firefox bookmarks
 that aren't in seamonkey.
 
 Is there a clever way to merge the two places.sqlite files and end up with
 no duplicates?
 
 Thanks,
 
 jim

If you're willing to use SM2.1b1 you can try the FF Sync add-on. For
FF3.6.13 Sync is available as add-on, for FF4 it's already built in.
Sync used to work reasonably well, but with the last upgrade to  version
1.6 it tends to screw things up. It seems version 1.6.2 is out now,
which claims to address these issues, but I haven't tried it.
I have switched to Xmarks after the trouble with Sync, and it works just
fine for me with FF and Chrome, but I believe Seamonkey is not supported
by Xmarks.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/firefox-sync/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firefox-sync/

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

[Christian Riechers]

On 09/17/2010 12:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
 David E. Ross wrote:
 On 9/16/10 2:57 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
 Daniel wrote:
 Phillip Jones wrote:
 Leonidas Jones wrote:
 Rich Grayrbg_smth...@graysmail.com   wrote:
 Robert Kaiser wrote:
 ... SeaMonkey 2.0.8 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as

[snip]

 Starting with  2.07  they built in a sanitizer code into SM in which I
 you belong to a HTML Group that allows sound and movies within the post.
 you can go to inserthtml and insert it. but after its posted its
 removed by default. The developer types are becoming paranoid and almost
 dictatorial like with what they want to allow you to do with your own
 computer. If people on the other end in the intended group want to see
 it or not its their discretion to open it or not.

 Were it not for that ability to test in a Group sound code recently, I
 would not have figured out  a way to insert properly in my website. So
 until its turned off I am sticking with 2.0.6 untill it physically won't
 work. Oh its in the latest version of TB as well.


 Are you sure this problem is not caused by filters in the newsgroup
 servers?

 Audio and video files embedded in messages travel the Internet as
 attachments, not inline.  They become inline when received and merged by
 your E-mail or news client (e.g., Thunderbird, SeaMonkey).  Furthermore,
 they travel the Internet as binary attachments.  Many newsgroup servers
 strip away binary attachments.

 here is the actual code when you open about config:
 
 mailnews.display.html_sanitizer.allowed.tags
 

[snip]

This may help to get you going again with the latest SM.
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.thunderbird/browse_thread/thread/206b23578f113e07#

-- 
Christian
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey