Re: buttons are painted!

2015-12-01 Thread pjdkrunkt
On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 11:36:57 AM UTC-5, Rick Merrill wrote:
> Sm2.39, win 10 (from win 8), Dell 5000, long time user of seamonkey...
> 
> When I first launch Sm the windows appear but the icons of buttons 
> do not appear until I mouse over them!  What's up with that?
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Rick

There have been painting issues in other windows versions for some time now.  
The "new tab" button sometimes doesn't appear until I mouse over it for a few 
versions now in Win7.  I've also had issues with some themes not appearing.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Updateing Plugins

2015-03-24 Thread pjdkrunkt
Mozilla never really got any of that part of the Addons Manager working 
correctly in Firefox, so SeaMonkey has the same weirdness.  Mozilla is trying 
to get away from recommending Plugins so I suspect in the near future some of 
that stuff will be ripped out.  If you want a specific Plugin, you just need to 
go to it's official website and install it... you cannot install Plugins 
through Firefox/SeaMonkey anyway... they have to be installed at the OS level.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Previously typed addresses only doesn't work

2015-03-24 Thread pjdkrunkt
Firefox developers changed the mechanism for how this works and the SeaMonkey 
devs have not had a change to update the UI.  I've written up a guide for 
getting the settings back the way you want them here:

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=2920253
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag

2015-03-24 Thread pjdkrunkt
On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:33:24 PM UTC-4, mozilla-li...@spamgourmet.com 
wrote:
 Daniel wrote:
  On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote:
  On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote:
 
  Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why they don't separate
  out the newer versions, maybe they only list the most popular two
  individually.
 
  There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can
  change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc.
 
  Phil
 
  Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the Top N to 10
  and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-(
 
 2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's 
 been more active than any other individual version for about the last 
 week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put 
 together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the 
 rankings for the Top N are calculated!
 
 Mark.

IF the Top picks are cumulative then 2.33 will not be top because it hasn't 
been out long enough, and 2.26 will probably remain at the top because it was 
the stalled version, lasting for 3 entire release periods when 2.27 and 2.28 
were skipped.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: No WebGL?

2015-03-20 Thread pjdkrunkt
WebGL support is extremely spotty in Firefox.  It's blocked on almost all XP 
systems, and there are vast lists of GPU's it's blocked on.  Basically unless 
you are running the latest-and-greatest gaming system you shouldn't expect it 
to work.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey more secure than Firefox

2015-03-04 Thread pjdkrunkt
What a ridiculous steaming pile of garbage.  The entire premise upon which this 
study and it's conclusions are based is 100% backwards.  Most software 
companies do not publicly report security vulnerabilities until they are fixed 
and that fix is released.  

Also, a great many of the vulnerabilities in Firefox are discovered by Firefox 
developers and community members and patched before anyone on the outside even 
knows about them.  And one path of inquiry into a vulnerability will often lead 
to the discovery of other related possible vulnerabilities which also end up 
fixed.  There's even cases of vulnerabilities created by new code in 
development builds that is fixed long before the code that created the hole 
appears in a release version.  Security contests like PWN-2-OWN make all 
discovered vulnerabilities known to the software developers before results of 
the contest are published, giving firms a chance to fix them... note that IE 
scores on PWN-2-OWN are sometimes redacted for these reasons.  

So instead of high numbers of published vulnerabilities representing unsecure 
software, it generally represents the exact opposite... active and aggressive 
security testing and fixing.

So what's the least secure setup?  Anything that hasn't been updated.  
Especially if it's Windows running IE and Java. 


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Find box invoked without being requested

2014-12-14 Thread pjdkrunkt
Yes, it's an accessibility feature called Type Ahead Find which is enabled by 
default in SeaMonkey.  In about:config you can disable by setting these prefs 
to false: 

accessibility.typeaheadfind
accessibility.typeaheadfind.autostart

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?

2014-12-14 Thread pjdkrunkt
Mozilla's plugin-check page is updated manually and is *never* up-to-date.  In 
fact, it generally considers many ancient versions of plugins to be current and 
occasionally it will even say that brand new versions are out-of-date.  The 
plan was to convince the various plugins developers to adopt a system of 
notifications that all browsers could use to keep their plugins up-to-date.  
This likely was never considered because Google's answer was to simply bundle 
important plugins into Chrome, thus circumventing the whole mess.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!

2014-12-14 Thread pjdkrunkt
 On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:41:25 PM UTC-5, David E. Ross wrote:

 I have the PrefBar extension.  I created my own button to toggle the
 HTML5 preference, which is media.autoplay.enabled.  That way, HTML5 is
 not tied to Flash.
 


AFAIK, this preference stopped working some time ago and Mozilla is in no hurry 
to fix it for some reason.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-11 Thread pjdkrunkt
Does media.autoplay.enabled not work?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Ghostery 5.3.1 no longer supports SeaMonkey until new code

2014-06-11 Thread pjdkrunkt
One of the improvements in Australis is a new API for adding buttons to 
toolbars. There is talk of porting this code over to SeaMonkey.  But it seems 
rather obnoxious for an extension developer to stop supporting the standard 
methods for toolbar buttons which have worked since the olden days, and STILL 
works in Firefox.  

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: A good AdBlock Plus replacement for SeaMonkey web browsers?

2014-05-22 Thread pjdkrunkt
On Friday, May 16, 2014 2:03:20 PM UTC-4, Ant wrote:
 ABP is getting bloated and buggy especially with 
 
 https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1t=22906 , 
 
 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29247514- , etc. Are there any good ad 
 
 blocker replacements for SeaMonkeys in Linux/Debian, Mac OS X, and Windows?


To my knowledge, most of the alternative adblockers are really just copies of 
AdBlock Plus, built from the same exact source with one two differences.  And 
at least one of them was distributing spyware.

You can use a hosts file at the OS level to block URLs known to distribute ads. 
 It's not 100% the same as adblock, but there is no browser overhead to use it.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: x in tabs

2014-02-18 Thread pjdkrunkt
Hi guys, I am the developer of Sea Fox.  I knew some of you probably wouldn't 
like everything that Sea Fox does, so I've gotten permission from CatTheif to 
resurrect SeaTab X.  In the next few days SeaTab-X-2 should appear here: 
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/seatab-x-2/

It is not exactly like the last version of SeaTab X, and it does require that 
you change the browser.tabs.closeButtons setting to work the way you expect it 
to.

Please leave feedback here: 
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=48t=2802443
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: x in tabs

2014-02-18 Thread pjdkrunkt
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 2:28:17 PM UTC-5, EE wrote:
 
 
 Why does Sea Fox support the use of only 3 themes?  Why only support one 
 
 third-party theme?

Sea Fox *supports* any and all themes.  It is *not* the job of extensions to 
have custom icon sets for every single theme in the world.  That is the job of 
themers if they wish to do so.  I have provided icons for the Firefox-style 
theme because those icons already exist in Firefox 3 itself and because it 
makes sense to have it fully functioning.  Any themer who wishes to add support 
for Sea Fox is welcome to contact me on MozillaZine and I will provide 
instruction.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey