On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:33:24 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > Daniel wrote: > > On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote: > >> On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote: > >> > >>> Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why "they" don't separate > >>> out the newer versions, maybe "they" only list the most popular two > >>> individually. > >> > >> There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can > >> change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc. > >> > >> Phil > >> > > Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the "Top N" to 10 > > and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-( > > 2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's > been more active than any other individual version for about the last > week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put > together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the > rankings for the Top N are calculated! > > Mark.
IF the "Top" picks are cumulative then 2.33 will not be top because it hasn't been out long enough, and 2.26 will probably remain at the top because it was the "stalled" version, lasting for 3 entire release periods when 2.27 and 2.28 were skipped. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
