Re: How to block e-mail

2009-10-17 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

John Doue wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:



ldj1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

How do I block e-mail from a certain e-mail address? I have seamonkey 
and pop mail sbcglobal.net.


Two basic approaches:

1) If your ISP offers this option, set up a filter on the server so 
the messages get trashed before you ever download them. This may be 
relevant: http://promo.sbcglobal.net/sbcyahoodsl/faq.html#emailQ10


2) Set up a filter on your local machine that moves the targeted 
messages to trash whenever you download them. Ideally, it also marks 
them as read. Click the account name in the folder list and choose 
Manage message filters.


The advantage of the first option is efficiency/elegance -- you don't 
waste time and resources downloading and then trashing them, and you 
can't possibly be annoyed by something you never see. The disadvantage 
is that it's permanent and unrecoverable (unless we're talking about a 
system that doesn't purge messages from trash until they've been there 
for a week or so).


The advantage of the second option is that you can periodically scan 
through your trash to make sure you're not filtering legitimate 
messages; as above, this relies on your trash-emptying settings. For 
example, my machine is set to empty trash on exit, so if I want the 
opportunity to review, I have to either do so before exiting or filter 
to junk, where messages survive for a week. The disadvantage of the 
second option, conversely, is that you spend time and resources 
downloading junk, and you might be tempted to view it and aggravate 
yourself.


I agree with this analysis but I would suggest a third approach as an 
alternative to the first Paul suggests since I believe (might be wrong 
though) most ISPs limit the filtering possibility to Web mail.


Various ISPs offer the user various capabilities; since I'm not an 
sbcglobal subscriber I can only speculate.


In my case, my company's web host (Hostway) affords the ability to view 
email through a webmail interface or to download it by the conventional 
POP method. I can even do both with a particular message -- view it 
through the webmail interface, leave it in the Inbox, and then download 
it later through POP mail.


They also offer a customizable filtering system called CleanMail Plus, 
whereby I can white- or blacklist potential senders, overriding their 
general spam-filtering system. And I can set the aggressiveness of the 
spam-filtering system as well.


To get my mail, I personally subscribe to a mail service (spamcop) which 
provides a lot of possibilities. Among them, the possibility to block 
certain addresses. The corresponding emails (along with emails 
considered as spam by spamcop) are stored on a specific directory of the 
server for a certain period of time (not sure, but 30 days I believe) 
with the possibility to release them. The user just needs to visit 
spamcop site to review and decide on the necessary action.


In spamcop settings, it is possible to stipulate a periodic reporting of 
such held mail which helps the user review held mail without having to 
login.


Of course, I have no interest in advertizing spamcop, I am just a very 
satisfied user. And of course also, there is a cost for this service 
(around $30.00 IIRC), well worth it in my opinion.


And the end of the day, this approach combines the advantages of the two 
offered by Paul. But unless you are willing to take the risk of missing 
some emails which could be important, some time has to be dedicated, one 
way or the other, to the reviewing emails ...


I generally try to limit my use of filtering on the server because of 
its unrecoverability. With a broadband connection, it's little skin off 
my nose to download and filter to junk, and I do periodically scan the 
subject/author lines in the junk folder to make sure I'm not filtering 
legitimate messages. I have a dozen or so addresses blacklisted on the 
server, but those people have gone above and beyond the call of doody 
and earned this treatment.


Our ISP's spam filter does a pretty good job; with SM's Junk folder set 
to purge messages when they reach an age of seven days, it normally has 
30-40 messages awaiting deletion, with an overall traffic level of 
300-400 incoming messages per business day and 100 per day on weekends.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


How to block e-mail

2009-10-16 Thread ldj1002
How do I block e-mail from a certain e-mail address? I have seamonkey 
and pop mail sbcglobal.net.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to block e-mail

2009-10-16 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM,  ldj1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 How do I block e-mail from a certain e-mail address? I have seamonkey and
 pop mail sbcglobal.net.

Create a message filter that deletes e-mails from that address.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How to block e-mail

2009-10-16 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

ldj1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

How do I block e-mail from a certain e-mail address? I have seamonkey 
and pop mail sbcglobal.net.


Two basic approaches:

1) If your ISP offers this option, set up a filter on the server so the 
messages get trashed before you ever download them. This may be 
relevant: http://promo.sbcglobal.net/sbcyahoodsl/faq.html#emailQ10


2) Set up a filter on your local machine that moves the targeted 
messages to trash whenever you download them. Ideally, it also marks 
them as read. Click the account name in the folder list and choose 
Manage message filters.


The advantage of the first option is efficiency/elegance -- you don't 
waste time and resources downloading and then trashing them, and you 
can't possibly be annoyed by something you never see. The disadvantage 
is that it's permanent and unrecoverable (unless we're talking about a 
system that doesn't purge messages from trash until they've been there 
for a week or so).


The advantage of the second option is that you can periodically scan 
through your trash to make sure you're not filtering legitimate 
messages; as above, this relies on your trash-emptying settings. For 
example, my machine is set to empty trash on exit, so if I want the 
opportunity to review, I have to either do so before exiting or filter 
to junk, where messages survive for a week. The disadvantage of the 
second option, conversely, is that you spend time and resources 
downloading junk, and you might be tempted to view it and aggravate 
yourself.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey