Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
On 9/11/2010 3:13 PM PT, Ray_Net typed: Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this suggestion) Maybe you should correct this bug/implement this suggestion if you know how to program. Mozilla could use some extra help. BTW, you misspelled developers. -- We now go live to Ollie Williams in Channel 5 traffic chopper. What's scene? --Tom Tucker. Everyone looks like ants! That is probably because you're up so high. from Family Guy. /\___/\ Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.09.2010 17:13, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Chris Ilias wrote: On 10-09-10 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task Is the intent of your post to get help with something, or draw attention of developers? Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this suggestion) You allude minimum work, is this from your own personal experience as a programmer or are you just making a guess? i think ... a personal expérience... the coding could be like... If Reply-header-like-forward is true then begin reply-header-composition end; The reply-header-composition could be call forward-header-composition; or a copy/paste of the forward-header-composition coding. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
Ant wrote: On 9/11/2010 3:13 PM PT, Ray_Net typed: Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this suggestion) Maybe you should correct this bug/implement this suggestion if you know how to program. Mozilla could use some extra help. That's the problem, i don't kow if my programmming experience will be enough, and if i must install programs on my computer(o compile something) , if i need all the SM sources, if my tests/modifications will interfere with my installed SM, if ...etc BTW, you misspelled developers. Sorry, my motherlanguage is french :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task But, Ray, a solution was provided in Comment 7 of the thread If that's what you need, then forward it.. Problem solved. I see for this bug: Assigned To: Nobody; OK to take it and work on it Status: NEW (instead of CLOSED) i see also: Whiteboard: [workaround: comment #61] instead of : Whiteboard: [CLOSED: Use Forward instead of Reply] The problem is not solved ... it's just a detour ... When you do a reply the mail adress is filled. When you do a forward ..the mail adress is not filled. So you have to fiddle ... and fiddle twice. I repeat the solution is to work on it for at a maximum of 1 minute. If you're not happy with the current solution, Ray, you are allowed to work on your own solution to work on it for at a maximum of 1 minute Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
On 12.09.2010 03:03, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.09.2010 17:13, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Chris Ilias wrote: On 10-09-10 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task Is the intent of your post to get help with something, or draw attention of developers? Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this suggestion) You allude minimum work, is this from your own personal experience as a programmer or are you just making a guess? i think ... a personal expérience... the coding could be like... If Reply-header-like-forward is true then begin reply-header-composition end; The reply-header-composition could be call forward-header-composition; or a copy/paste of the forward-header-composition coding. File a RFE bug. -- *Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion* www.ufaq.org Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Flock - Thunderbird ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.09.2010 03:03, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.09.2010 17:13, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Chris Ilias wrote: On 10-09-10 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task Is the intent of your post to get help with something, or draw attention of developers? Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this suggestion) You allude minimum work, is this from your own personal experience as a programmer or are you just making a guess? i think ... a personal expérience... the coding could be like... If Reply-header-like-forward is true then begin reply-header-composition end; Thereply-header-composition could be callforward-header-composition; or a copy/paste of theforward-header-composition coding. File a RFE bug. Just done: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595696 but i think that this will be immediately closed like: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 218258 :-( :-( ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task But, Ray, a solution was provided in Comment 7 of the thread If that's what you need, then forward it.. Problem solved. Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task Well, let's see, just how much are you paying them anyway? But, Ray, a solution was provided in Comment 7 of the thread If that's what you need, then forward it.. Problem solved. Daniel Good: a workaround that should satisfy everybody. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds
On 11.09.2010 17:13, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Chris Ilias wrote: On 10-09-10 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task Is the intent of your post to get help with something, or draw attention of developers? Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this suggestion) You allude minimum work, is this from your own personal experience as a programmer or are you just making a guess? -- *Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion* www.ufaq.org Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Flock - Thunderbird ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
