Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:53:55 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: You actually have time for vacation?? :-) I needed to make time to avoid burn-out. And I could do so in November, those three weeks were worth every second. ;-) I agree. Since coming back from his vacation KaiRo has stopped biting peoples heads off every time they breath the wrong way. I mean he was even polite to BenoitRen! Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]If love is blind, lingerie makes great braille. * TagZilla 0.066.6 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:53:55 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: You actually have time for vacation?? :-) I needed to make time to avoid burn-out. And I could do so in November, those three weeks were worth every second. ;-) I agree. Since coming back from his vacation KaiRo has stopped biting peoples heads off every time they breath the wrong way. I mean he was even polite to BenoitRen! Phil Wait till you retire. Then you get no vacations. I haven't been on a Vacation since I had to retire under disability in 1991. My recommendation to all is die with your boots on. Stay hunched over that computer, or keep that soldering iron in your hand until the last drop of life goes out. Retirement is no fun after the first year. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Phillip Jones wrote: Retirement is no fun after the first year. You're doing it wrong. -JW (retired 10 years and still loving it) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Retirement is no fun after the first year. You're doing it wrong. -JW (retired 10 years and still loving it) The problem is money. If you have money. But living in Social Security, you lucky to just pay your bills. Just like I'd love to get a new laptop but in order to do so I'll have to pull funds out of my retirement. My vehicle is a 1991 with no dream of getting another. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Phillip Jones wrote: J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Retirement is no fun after the first year. You're doing it wrong. -JW (retired 10 years and still loving it) The problem is money. If you have money. But living in Social Security, you lucky to just pay your bills. Ah. Understood, and sorry to hear that - being broke sucks. Being SE my entire career, and having _no_ faith whatsoever in SS, I did a pretty good job of saving on my own along the way, and so find myself now in good shape, with SS and my wife's GE pension still around the corner. -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:53:55 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: You actually have time for vacation?? :-) I needed to make time to avoid burn-out. And I could do so in November, those three weeks were worth every second. ;-) I agree. Since coming back from his vacation KaiRo has stopped biting peoples heads off every time they breath the wrong way. I mean he was even polite to BenoitRen! Phil Wait till you retire. Then you get no vacations. I haven't been on a Vacation since I had to retire under disability in 1991. My recommendation to all is die with your boots on. Stay hunched over that computer, or keep that soldering iron in your hand until the last drop of life goes out. Retirement is no fun after the first year. ...ya gotta have hobbies...I got a small dose of what retirement will be like when I was off on medical leave for near a year...I can't WAIT to be retired...I got LOTS of hobbies... -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the streets. FF 3.5.5 was a very short-cycle crash-fix-only release and we didn't have the resources to create an update at that time (mostly because our only build and release engineer, that is my humble self, was just about to go into a vacation), so we still went with the regularly scheduled security update as a base, which is today's FF 3.5.6 release. And that's why SeaMonkey 2.0.1 has been in testing mode for about a week now and just was made public (it's pretty normal to have 1-2 weeks of testing phase before we make a release public, so that we can catch any unexpected problems that might still be in the release builds). Robert Kaiser You actually have time for vacation?? :-) I just update to 2.0.1 seems to cleared up a problem I turned into Bugzilla a week or two ago. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Phillip Jones wrote: You actually have time for vacation?? :-) I needed to make time to avoid burn-out. And I could do so in November, those three weeks were worth every second. ;-) I just update to 2.0.1 seems to cleared up a problem I turned into Bugzilla a week or two ago. Good to hear! Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? I know about using nighties I used to do that myself to test and comment. When the comments went in one ear and out the other I quit using nighties. I figured my comments didn't count for anything, so why risk damaging my computer for nothing. But believe I read either in this forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the streets. well I've updated to FF3.5.5 a couple of weeks ago, and still no update. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Phillip Jones wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? I know about using nighties I used to do that myself to test and comment. When the comments went in one ear and out the other I quit using nighties. I figured my comments didn't count for anything, so why risk damaging my computer for nothing. But believe I read either in this forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the streets. well I've updated to FF3.5.5 a couple of weeks ago, and still no update. So all these people talking about SM 2.0.1 are using the nightlies? I think you must be right, but this is not generally apparent from the way they talk. -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
Phillip Jones wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? But believe I read either in this forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the streets. well I've updated to FF3.5.5 a couple of weeks ago, and still no update. That's because they'll both be released *today*. ;-) The people already using 2.0.1 are those who installed the latest 2.0.1 release candidate which now that no new release candidate will be released, is exactly what will be released as 2.0.1 later today (well most probably that is, only KaiRo knows for sure). Release candidates cannot be distinguished from final versions because the last of the former will always be released as the latter, unchanged. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
David Wilkinson wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? /snip/ So all these people talking about SM 2.0.1 are using the nightlies? I think you must be right, but this is not generally apparent from the way they talk. Its a release candidate that we were asked to test, should be released today I think. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? Thanks all. I got it now. It's the release candidate. -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1
NoOp wrote: On 12/15/2009 11:21 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? But believe I read either in this forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the streets. well I've updated to FF3.5.5 a couple of weeks ago, and still no update. That's because they'll both be released *today*. ;-) Apparently not yet as of 19:12 PDT Missed by 4 minutes, see Robert's post. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
