[Biofuel] World must wake up to the dangers of biofuels

2006-09-10 Thread D. Mindock
http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=60393

Kew boss: 'World must wake up to the dangers of biofuels'
Source:  Copyright 2006, Independent (UK)
Date:  September 9, 2006


The world should wake up to the dangers of the mass production of biofuels, 
which are increasingly seen as a major solution to global warming, according 
to Professor Sir Peter Crane, director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

Extensive production of biofuel crops, such as oil palms, could destroy 
remaining areas of rainforest and bring about a new cycle of worldwide 
intensive agriculture involving vast applications of artificial fertilisers 
and pesticides, and requiring enormous water resources, said Professor 
Crane, who as the head of Kew Gardens is the world's leading plant 
scientist.

There are big opportunities with biofuels, but there are big problems too, 
he said. It's not a free lunch.

Professor Crane, 52, is retiring from Kew after seven very successful years 
to take up a chair at the University of Chicago, and gave his biofuels 
warning as part of a valedictory interview with The Independent.

It comes at a critical moment. The production of road transport fuels made 
from crops, which do not add to the greenhouse gases causing global warming, 
is now starting to take off around the globe, and is likely to grow vastly. 
It will be one of the main agricultural developments of the 21st century.

The attraction of biofuels in the fight against climate change is that they 
are carbon neutral. Unlike the fossil fuels, oil, gas and coal, which when 
burnt add to the net amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the CO2 
which biofuels produce when ignited has been absorbed from the atmosphere by 
the crops used to make them, and so the net atmospheric amount is not 
increased.

The best known biofuels are ethanol, a petrol substitute made from sugar 
cane, sugar beet or maize, widely used in Brazil and coming into use in many 
other countries, and biodiesel, which is made from oil palms, oilseed rape 
or recycled vegetable oil.

American output of ethanol from maize is now rising at 30 per cent a year; 
Germany is raising output of biodiesel by nearly 50 per cent a year and 
China has built the world's biggest ethanol plant. Britain jumped on to the 
biofuels bandwagon this year with an obligation on British petrol companies 
to blend a fixed proportion of biofuels with all the petrol and diesel that 
they sell on garage forecourts. But Sir Peter sounded a strongly cautionary 
note about the new developments. If we're serious about biofuels, we're 
going to have to produce them in a much more sustainable way than intensive 
agriculture has given us in the past, he said.
He voiced a concern which has already been highlighted by some environmental 
groups - that mass expansion of biofuel production might lead to a new round 
of rainforest destruction, especially with crops such as oil palm. Oil palm 
needs warm humid conditions and is largely grown in south-east Asia on land 
from which rainforest has been cleared. Expansion of oil palm production is 
going to have to be handled extremely carefully to ensure that it doesn't 
start to eat into the remaining pieces of rainforest that still exist, 
Professor Crane said.

He went on: We're going to have to get biofuels off land that's already 
degraded, perhaps land that's not valuable for other purposes, for 
conservation or for agriculture. And we've got to do it without creating 
other problems with the kinds of inputs that in the past have gone into 
intensive agriculture.

It was possible that intensive biofuel production might involve too much 
nitrogen-based fertiliser, pesticides and herbicides, in order to get the 
desired level of production, he said, as well as taking up enormous amounts 
of scarce water in irrigation.

Sir Peter will be succeeded as director at Kew by Professor Stephen Hopper 
from the University of Western Australia. In his timeat the Royal Botanic 
Gardens he has been one of the leading figures in world plant conservation, 
and was a principal architect of the UN's Global Plant Conservation 
Strategy.

Under his direction, Kew has been leading the way in one of the strategy's 
first aims - to provide a working checklist of all the plants of the world. 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Secret to cheap petrol is coal

2006-09-10 Thread D. Mindock
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/secret-to-cheap-petrol-is-coal/2006/09/09/1157222384113.html

Secret to cheap petrol is coal
Jason Dowling
September 10, 2006


A $5 BILLION proposal to turn some of Victoria's abundant brown coal into 
diesel moved a step closer after the State Government revealed it was about 
to grant a mining licence to the company behind the project.
Energy Minister Theo Theophanous told The Sunday Age that the project aimed 
to produce about 60,000 barrels a day of high-quality diesel fuel at a much 
lower cost than present world prices.

He said an announcement on a mining licence for Monash Energy was likely to 
be made before the November 25 state election.

The mining licence approval would include details of the total investment 
and when the plant would be operational.

The first stage, which will cost between $300 million and $400 million, 
would be a demonstration plant that could be up and running in six years.

The entire project should be operational in 10 years.

The project has the backing of Shell and the big mining company Anglo 
American.

A key aspect of the project, promoted as clean energy, would be the 
minimising of greenhouse gas emissions by separating the carbon dioxide from 
the brown coal and storing it underground - a project known as 
geosequestration.

About $1.5 billion of the $5 billion project would be spent on the 
geosequestration process, Mr Theophanous said.

The project would be one of the world's biggest carbon dioxide capture and 
storage projects, with the gas stored deep underground in the offshore oil 
and gas fields in the Gippsland Basin.

Mr Theophanous told The Sunday Age that a trial geosequestration project 
near Warrnambool had received $4 million in State Government money and would 
likely begin depositing carbon dioxide underground next year.
We have to find out - does it work and how safe is it? he said. It would 
be selfish to not worry about global warming, leaving it to our children.

Victoria is estimated to have about 500 years of brown coal reserves in the 
Latrobe Valley.

Mr Theophanous said that if geosequestration was successful, Victoria could 
cut to close to zero the emissions from new brown coal power stations in 
the future. He said Victoria would need a new base-load power station in the 
next decade, but he did not expect the geosequestration technology to be 
ready until the power station after next. Mr Theophanous said it would also 
be unlikely the geosequestration technology would have much impact on 
emissions from Victoria's existing power stations.

Peter Cook, chief executive of the company CO2CRC, which is behind the 
geosequestration trial at Nirranda, near Warrnambool, said its success was 
absolutely crucial to the future of the Monash Energy coal-to-diesel 
project.

Dr Cook said there had been keen interest in the geosequestration trial from 
around the world.
He said representatives from other countries and the International Energy 
Agency would be in Melbourne next month to examine the geosequestration 
trial. He said they would look at how the carbon could be monitored once it 
was stored underground.

The project is expected to be the first geosequestration trial in Australia 
when up and running next year.
Opposition Leader Ted Baillieu said he supported any project that tackled 
carbon dioxide emissions at their source.

But a Greenpeace energy campaigner, Mark Wakeham, said geosequestration was 
untried and expensive.
We don't know whether the CO 2 can be stored for the long term, he said. 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] soap or mono- and diglycerides

2006-09-10 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:05:59PM -0700, Ken Provost wrote:
 
 On Sep 9, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
 
 
  I'm talking about the result I get from the washing test. I know the
  soap formation is only possible in presence of water dissolving
  the lye. That's probably why aggresive mixing in the test
  could produce the soap in my case.
 
 
 Except by the time you're washing, the NaOH will be so dilute it
 shouldn't produce any additional soap. I think all your glycerides
 and all your soap will be present already -- if you want to know
 the relative proportions, an FFA assay or gas chromatogram
 are possible ways.

One of the reasons I raised this question is that I'd like to know for
sure, after my product fails the wash test, whether I should increase
the amount of lye or decrease it.


-- 
cheers,

 Rafal Szczesniak  **mir[at]diament.iit.pwr.wroc.pl
 Samba Team member mi***[at]samba.org
+-+
 *BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba  http://www.samba.org
+-+


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] World must wake up to the dangers of biofuels

2006-09-10 Thread MK DuPree



Of course, the solution to 
all of this is to make more use of our bicycles or even better yet our 
feet. What the world must wake up to is the nightmare we've created with 
our technology...for what purpose? To get from here to there faster? 
More conveniently? Oh, to live longer? Why? Fear? 
Convenience? More money for more power to bonk your neighbor? 
Madness run amok!!! Oh, but they say I'm the one who is mad! Hell 
yes I'm mad...and probably crazy too. Whatever. I'm going outside to 
pull some weeds and listen to the bees buzz. Mike DuPree

- Original Message - 
From: "D. Mindock" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 5:28 
AM
Subject: [Biofuel] World must wake up to 
the dangers of biofuels
 http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=60393  Kew boss: 'World must wake up to the 
dangers of biofuels' Source: Copyright 2006, Independent 
(UK) Date: September 9, 2006   The world 
should wake up to the dangers of the mass production of biofuels,  which 
are increasingly seen as a major solution to global warming, according  
to Professor Sir Peter Crane, director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, 
Kew.  Extensive production of biofuel crops, such as oil palms, 
could destroy  remaining areas of rainforest and bring about a new cycle 
of worldwide  intensive agriculture involving vast applications of 
artificial fertilisers  and pesticides, and requiring enormous water 
resources, said Professor  Crane, who as the head of Kew Gardens is the 
world's leading plant  scientist.  "There are big 
opportunities with biofuels, but there are big problems too,"  he said. 
"It's not a free lunch."  Professor Crane, 52, is retiring from 
Kew after seven very successful years  to take up a chair at the 
University of Chicago, and gave his biofuels  warning as part of a 
valedictory interview with The Independent.  It comes at a 
critical moment. The production of road transport fuels made  from 
crops, which do not add to the greenhouse gases causing global warming,  
is now starting to take off around the globe, and is likely to grow vastly. 
 It will be one of the main agricultural developments of the 21st 
century.  The attraction of biofuels in the fight against 
climate change is that they  are "carbon neutral". Unlike the fossil 
fuels, oil, gas and coal, which when  burnt add to the net amount of 
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the CO2  which biofuels produce when 
ignited has been absorbed from the atmosphere by  the crops used to make 
them, and so the net atmospheric amount is not  increased. 
 The best known biofuels are ethanol, a petrol substitute made from 
sugar  cane, sugar beet or maize, widely used in Brazil and coming into 
use in many  other countries, and biodiesel, which is made from oil 
palms, oilseed rape  or recycled vegetable oil.  
American output of ethanol from maize is now rising at 30 per cent a year; 
 Germany is raising output of biodiesel by nearly 50 per cent a year and 
 China has built the world's biggest ethanol plant. Britain jumped on to 
the  biofuels bandwagon this year with an obligation on British petrol 
companies  to blend a fixed proportion of biofuels with all the petrol 
and diesel that  they sell on garage forecourts. But Sir Peter sounded a 
strongly cautionary  note about the new developments. "If we're serious 
about biofuels, we're  going to have to produce them in a much more 
sustainable way than intensive  agriculture has given us in the past," 
he said. He voiced a concern which has already been highlighted by some 
environmental  groups - that mass expansion of biofuel production might 
lead to a new round  of rainforest destruction, especially with crops 
such as oil palm. Oil palm  needs warm humid conditions and is largely 
grown in south-east Asia on land  from which rainforest has been 
cleared. "Expansion of oil palm production is  going to have to be 
handled extremely carefully to ensure that it doesn't  start to eat into 
the remaining pieces of rainforest that still exist,"  Professor Crane 
said.  He went on: "We're going to have to get biofuels off land 
that's already  degraded, perhaps land that's not valuable for other 
purposes, for  conservation or for agriculture. And we've got to do it 
without creating  other problems with the kinds of inputs that in the 
past have gone into  intensive agriculture."  It was 
possible that intensive biofuel production might involve too much  
nitrogen-based fertiliser, pesticides and herbicides, in order to get the 
 desired level of production, he said, as well as taking up enormous 
amounts  of scarce water in irrigation.  Sir Peter will 
be succeeded as director at Kew by Professor Stephen Hopper  from the 
University of Western Australia. In his timeat the Royal Botanic  
Gardens he has been one of the leading figures in world plant conservation, 
 and was a principal architect of the UN's Global Plant Conservation 
 Strategy.  

Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Gregg Davidson
I hope Disney grows some major cojones,ones the size of 16lb bowling balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand up to what's inthe mini serieslike a vampire doesto sunlight. Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the USSenate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not evenfunny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, againstDisney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entireDemocratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious trouble.Read it, then read my analysis of it
 below:September 7, 2006Mr. Robert A. IgerPresident and CEOThe Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetBurbank CA 91521Dear Mr. Iger,We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of ThePath to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports fromexperts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and seriousinaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about thetragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, themanner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertisedsuggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major andwell respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancelthis broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a
 teaching tool in schoolsacross America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed andfactually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be agross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, toyour shareholders, and to the nation.The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcastlicense predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principleobligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest.Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty ofbroadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an openand accurate discussion of political ideas and events.Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Reportand are using that assertion as
 part of the promotional campaign for it. The9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks,and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the veryevents themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by anywho attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educationalprogram. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When youtake on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an importantevent, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.”Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 isbased on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, aswell as other experts on the issues,
 disagree.Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners whorecently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying tothink how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the waythat they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,”New York Times, September 6, 2006]Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national securityadvisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of theprogram’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent,“It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized asInaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as aconsultant to
 ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought theywere making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, hasadmitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries IsCriticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven falserecounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of itscreators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, thatDisney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning ofand the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries,
 Mr.Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs andtalk shows.Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could beconstrued as right-wing 

[Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread robert and benita rabello




Hello everyone!

 I have a FOREST of sunflowers in my garden this year. (The tallest
one measured over four meters in height when I finally cut it down.)
But now I have dozens of seed heads laying next to my compost pile. I
don't know what to do with them, and my saintly mother-in-law is
getting upset at me for letting them "rot" on the ground.

 Is there an inexpensive, simple solution to getting the seeds out
of their hulls? (I like sunflower seeds, especially in salads.) If I
leave the seed heads out, I'm thinking that they might represent a food
source for birds, but the only birds that hang around here in the
winter are crows, ravens and seagulls--species I've never seen using
sunflower seeds as a food source. (And I'm not sure I want a bunch of
crows hanging around my house either!)

 Any ideas for what I could do about this?


robert luis rabello
"The Edge of Justice"
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread Ken Provost
On Sep 10, 2006, at 9:31 AM, robert and benita rabello wrote: Hello everyone! I have a FOREST of sunflowers in my garden this year. I don't knowwhat to do with them, and my saintly mother-in-law is getting upset atme for letting them "rot" on the ground. Any ideas for what I could do about this?Get yourself a seed press and make sunflower oil -- great on salads,and makes good biodiesel!Better yet, ship them all to ME and I'LL make sunflower oil :-)-K___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread robert and benita rabello
Ken Provost wrote:

 Get yourself a seed press and make sunflower oil -- great on salads,
 and makes good biodiesel!


I like my salads naked, and I don't own a diesel.  But, where can 
I find a seed press?


 Better yet, ship them all to ME and I'LL make sunflower oil :-)


Wouldn't there be a food miles issue with that?  : -) 

Of course, you could come and visit, enjoy our hospitality, then 
take as many as you want with you when you leave . . .

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Mike Weaver
Yeah! And I wish Clinton's legacy would stop forcing us to borrow all 
that money - what is it - 2 billion a week?


And I'm really mad about Clinton's Legacy making up all those stories 
about WMD in Iraq!


And I really wish Clinton's Legacy would follow through on its promise 
to catch Osama bin Laden.


Stop it, Clinton's Legacy, Stop it now! You're all to blame.





Gregg Davidson wrote:

I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling 
balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series 
anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand 
up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight.


*/Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:



This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of
the US
Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of
Disney, it's
not even
funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative,
against
Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the
entire
Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in
serious
trouble.

Read it, then read my analysis of it below:
September 7, 2006

Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521

Dear Mr. Iger,

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming
broadcast of The
Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless
reports from
experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and
serious
inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the
American people
about the
tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day.
Furthermore,
the
manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and
advertised
suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like
Disney and a
major and
well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to
cancel
this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching
tool in
schools
across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and
factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to
children
would be a
gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to
the law,
to
your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free
broadcast
license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle
obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the
public interest.
Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in
the duty
of
broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting
an open
and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission
Report
and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign
for it.
The
9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11
attacks,
and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed,
the very
events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme
care by
any
who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or
educational
program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment,
“When you
take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an
important
event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.�

Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.

Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path
to 9/11
is
based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners
themselves,
as
well as other experts on the issues, disagree.

Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11
Commissioners
who
recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we
were trying
to
think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s
findings
the way
that they had.� [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate
and
Biased,�
New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national
security
advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed�
and said
of the
program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an
intelligence
agent,
“It’s 180 degrees from what happened.� [“9/11 Miniseries Is
Criticized as
Inaccurate and Biased,� New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a
consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through 

Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread DHAJOGLO
On Sunday, September 10, 2006  7:31 AM, Gregg Davidson wrote:
I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling balls, 
calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series anyway.

Well, I would imagine Disney/ABC wouldn't need huevos that large to spin a few 
lies about 9/11... I mean, after all, BushCo has manged to lie up one side and 
down the other and I'm quite certian they all have tiny tiny testies.


Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand up to what's in 
the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight.


According to the abc website, this story goes back to 1993 to start the tale of 
Osama and 9/11.. Seems if they want to blame some people they may as well start 
back when Reagan was underwriting the conflict in Afganastan, or when Reagan 
traded arms with both Iran and Iraq, or when Bush Senior really pissed off 
Osama with Air Bases in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War.  After all of 
that, it does seem Clinton is a bastard for boinking a secretary rather than 
toying with the middle east like the two presidents before him.



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Mike Weaver
Stop muddying the waters.  The Clinton Admistration's Legacy just came 
and put crabgrass in my lawn.



DHAJOGLO wrote:

On Sunday, September 10, 2006  7:31 AM, Gregg Davidson wrote:
  

I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling balls, 
calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series anyway.



Well, I would imagine Disney/ABC wouldn't need huevos that large to spin a few 
lies about 9/11... I mean, after all, BushCo has manged to lie up one side and 
down the other and I'm quite certian they all have tiny tiny testies.


  

Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand up to what's 
in the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight.




According to the abc website, this story goes back to 1993 to start the tale 
of Osama and 9/11.. Seems if they want to blame some people they may as well 
start back when Reagan was underwriting the conflict in Afganastan, or when 
Reagan traded arms with both Iran and Iraq, or when Bush Senior really pissed 
off Osama with Air Bases in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War.  After all 
of that, it does seem Clinton is a bastard for boinking a secretary rather 
than toying with the middle east like the two presidents before him.



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread Ken Provost

On Sep 10, 2006, at 10:41 AM, robert and benita rabello wrote:


 I like my salads naked, and I don't own a diesel.  But, where can
 I find a seed press?



Journey to Forever has a good selection (all too expensive!) under
supplies and suppliers




 Of course, you could come and visit, enjoy our hospitality, then
 take as many as you want with you when you leave . . .



Sounds like fun!  Next time I'm in Canada..

-K

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Gregg Davidson
Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Yeah! And I wish Clinton's legacy would stop forcing us to borrow all that money - what is it - 2 billion a week?And I'm really mad about Clinton's Legacy making up all those stories about WMD in Iraq! "Der Schlickmeister" didn't make up any stories during his reign. Everything he said was honest to God fact.And I really wish Clinton's Legacy would follow through on its promise to catch Osama bin Laden. I do too. He was only interested in getting BJ's in the "Oral Orifice".Stop it, Clinton's Legacy, Stop it now! You're all to blame. I'm not at fault, I was dumb enough to vote for him.Gregg Davidson wrote: I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling 
 balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series  anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand  up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight. */Mike Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:   This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not even funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, against Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious trouble.  Read it, then read my analysis of it below: September 7, 2006  Mr. Robert A. Iger
 President and CEO The Walt Disney Company 500 South Buena Vista Street Burbank CA 91521  Dear Mr. Iger,  We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to
 cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.  The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an
 open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.  Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.” 
 Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.  Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.  Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]  Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security
 advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of the program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, “It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]  Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]  Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate 

Re: [Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread Keith Addison
On Sep 10, 2006, at 10:41 AM, robert and benita rabello wrote:
 
 
  I like my salads naked, and I don't own a diesel.  But, where can
  I find a seed press?



Journey to Forever has a good selection (all too expensive!) under
supplies and suppliers

DIY, cheap as junk:

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/oilpress.html
The Sunflower Seed Huller and Oil Press

Best

Keith


  Of course, you could come and visit, enjoy our hospitality, then
  take as many as you want with you when you leave . . .
 


Sounds like fun!  Next time I'm in Canada..

-K


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol

2006-09-10 Thread NV Dhana
To Saludos, Why you want to ferment whey to ethanol when you can make 
Tagatose sugar that is more lucrative fron whey.


From: Dimas Ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:56:32 +

I have a waste of 20,000 liters of cheese whey every day.
I want to convert it to ethanol, but a can not find Kluyveromyces Fragilis
to break the lactose. Anybody knows about it or another method to make it
happens?

Saludos!
Dimas


  
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
  
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
  
  
  
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Gregg Davidson
DHAJOGLO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Sunday, September 10, 2006 7:31 AM, Gregg Davidson wrote:I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series anyway.Well, I would imagine Disney/ABC wouldn't need huevos that large to spin a few lies about 9/11... I mean, after all, BushCo has manged to lie up one side and down the other and I'm quite certian they all have tiny tiny testies.  Bush Lied! Bush Lied!! Bush Lied!!! Can't you people come up with something better than that?Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight.According to the abc website, this story goes back to 1993 to start the tale of Osama
 and 9/11.. Seems if they want to blame some people they may as well start back when Reagan was underwriting the conflict in Afganastan, or when Reagan traded arms with both Iran and Iraq, or when Bush Senior really pissed off Osama with Air Bases in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War. After all of that, it does seem Clinton is a bastard for boinking a secretary rather than toying with the middle east like the two presidents before him.I'm so sorry we pissed off "Uncle" Osama.We'd better not make him mad or he'll do some really mean like call the ACLU on us. ___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives
 (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 
	
		Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Keith Addison
I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb 
bowling balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini 
series anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy 
will stand up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to 
sunlight.

So Gregg, it doesn't matter if it's all lies and disinfo just as long 
as it supports the good guys (Republicans) and attacks the evil ones 
(Clinton), is that what you're saying?

Best

Keith


Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US
 Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's
 not even
 funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative,
 against
 Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire
 Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious
 trouble.
 
 Read it, then read my analysis of it below:
 September 7, 2006
 
 Mr. Robert A. Iger
 President and CEO
 The Walt Disney Company
 500 South Buena Vista Street
 Burbank CA 91521
 
 Dear Mr. Iger,
 
 We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The
 Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from
 experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious
 inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people
 about the
 tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore,
 the
 manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised
 suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a
 major and
 well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to
 cancel
 this broadcast to cease Disneyâ*™s plans to use it as a teaching tool in
 schools
 across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and
 factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children
 would be a
 gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law,
 to
 your shareholders, and to the nation.
 
 The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast
 license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle
 obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the
 public interest.
 Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty
 of
 broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open
 and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.
 
 Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission
 Report
 and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it.
 The
 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11
 attacks,
 and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very
 events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by
 any
 who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational
 program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment,
 â*œWhen you
 take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important
 event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.â*
 
 Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.
 
 Despite claims by your networkâ*™s representatives that The Path to 9/11
 is
 based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves,
 as
 well as other experts on the issues, disagree.
 
 Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners
 who
 recently viewed the program, said, â*œAs we were watching, we were trying
 to
 think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commissionâ*™s findings
 the way
 that they had.â* [â*œ9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and
 Biased,â*
 New York Times, September 6, 2006]
 
 Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security
 advisor to ABC has described the program as â*œdeeply flawedâ* and said
 of the
 programâ*™s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence
 agent,
 â*œItâ*™s 180 degrees from what happened.â* [â*œ9/11 Miniseries Is
 Criticized as
 Inaccurate and Biased,â* New York Times, September 6, 2006]
 
 Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a
 consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, â*œhe
 thought they
 were making things up.â* [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]
 
 Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has
 admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [â*œ9/11 Miniseries Is
 Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,â* New York Times, September 6, 2006]
 
 That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false
 recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the
 motivations of its
 creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that
 Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40
 

Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread DHAJOGLO
Gregg,
I don't mean to get you too upset.  But, hypocracy runs thick when it comes 
to this mini-series.  I don't doubt that Clinton's administration could have 
done things differently but remember, the attack came on BushCo's watch and the 
seeds were planted over several years.

On Sunday, September 10, 2006  6:28 PM, Gregg Davidson wrote:
  Bush Lied! Bush Lied!! Bush Lied!!! Can't you people come up with something 
 better than that?

Its interesting, they impeached Clinton for a lie.  The country was outraged at 
such an atrocity as a lie to the nation.  Would you suggest a lie about illicit 
sex is worse then a lie that has led to the deaths of the US's service men and 
women?  Or a lie about why 3000 people lost their lives in 9/11?


  I'm so sorry we pissed off Uncle Osama. We'd better not make him mad or 
 he'll do some really mean like call the ACLU on us.

Hey, I would love to see Osama captured.  But blaming his actions on one 
presidency only serves those who would hide from the truth.  And my suggestion 
that Clinton was no more at fault then the two presidents previous to him (not 
even including Eisenhower's successful attempt at destabilizing Iran) still 
stands.  Thus, to propagate a story that places blame for 9/11 at the feet of 
the Clinton administration is not only unfair but down right unpatriotic and 
un-American.  Its deplorable to those who suffered loss to lie about why and 
how it happened.

-dave


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Gregg Davidson
No Keith, that's not what I'm saying. A lie is a lie, regardless of who tells it.If President Bushdid the things that made Clinton famous, or infamous, I'd be screaming for him to be impreached too.There are things that thePresident is doing, as well as not doing, that I take exception to. I don't see the present administration threateningto pull the license of abroadcast network, or tryingviolate ABC's First Amendment Right,but the Democrat/Liberals are. They're calling outthe figurativeStorm Troopers, which is the typicalscare tactic.Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal
 bluff,  runs the mini series anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight.So Gregg, it doesn't matter if it's all lies and disinfo just as long as it supports the good guys (Republicans) and attacks the evil ones (Clinton), is that what you're saying?BestKeithMike Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:   This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not even funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, against Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious
 trouble.  Read it, then read my analysis of it below: September 7, 2006  Mr. Robert A. Iger President and CEO The Walt Disney Company 500 South Buena Vista Street Burbank CA 91521  Dear Mr. Iger,  We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a
 major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disneyâ*™s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.  The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve
 the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.  Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, â*œWhen you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.â*
  Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.  Despite claims by your networkâ*™s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.  Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, â*œAs we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commissionâ*™s findings the way that they had.â* [â*œ9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,â* New York Times, September 6, 2006]  Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as
 â*œdeeply flawedâ* and said of the programâ*™s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, â*œItâ*™s 180 degrees from what happened.â* [â*œ9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,â* New York Times, September 6, 2006]  Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, â*œhe thought they were making things up.â* [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]  Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the 

Re: [Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread robert and benita rabello
Keith Addison wrote:

DIY, cheap as junk:

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/oilpress.html
The Sunflower Seed Huller and Oil Press
  


I've been to the JTF site dozens of times.  Why have I never seen 
that???  You're a wealth of info, Keith, and I'm printing as I write.  
Thank you!

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Gregg Davidson
I'm not upset. I know that Clinton wouldn't take Osama on a silver platter 3 times. The atack may have come come on Bush's watch, but the inaction came on Clinton's, the first WTC bombing, Simalia, the USS Cole. I'm sure there is more than that.The Dems/Libs would try the same thing if God Himself told what happened.DHAJOGLO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Gregg,I don't mean to get you too upset. But, hypocracy runs thick when it comes to this mini-series. I don't doubt that Clinton's administration could have done things differently but remember, the attack came on BushCo's watch and the seeds were planted over several years.On Sunday, September 10, 2006 6:28 PM, Gregg Davidson wrote: Bush Lied! Bush Lied!! Bush Lied!!! Can't you people come up with something better than
 that?Its interesting, they impeached Clinton for a lie. The country was outraged at such an atrocity as a lie to the nation. Would you suggest a lie about illicit sex is worse then a lie that has led to the deaths of the US's service men and women? Or a lie about why 3000 people lost their lives in 9/11? I'm so sorry we pissed off "Uncle" Osama. We'd better not make him mad or he'll do some really mean like call the ACLU on us.Hey, I would love to see Osama captured. But blaming his actions on one presidency only serves those who would hide from the truth. And my suggestion that Clinton was no more at fault then the two presidents previous to him (not even including Eisenhower's successful attempt at destabilizing Iran) still stands. Thus, to propagate a story that places blame for 9/11 at the feet of the Clinton administration is not only unfair but down right unpatriotic and un-American. Its deplorable to those who suffered loss to lie
 about why and how it happened.-dave___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 
		 All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Cold Weather Oil Collection and Other Questions

2006-09-10 Thread Will Kelleher
Hey everyone,I am currently attending the University of Illinois. A student group that I am involved with has recently begun a project to convert all of the used cooking oil from the university food services into biodiesel to power university vehicles. The WVO is currently collected by a company that uses it to make animal feed. As of now, we are operating under the assumption that we will simply take oil from the company's tanks. If our use becomes so great that we collect all the oil, I understand that we will probably have to collect the oil in our own tanks. 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Cold Weather Collection and Other Questions

2006-09-10 Thread Will Kelleher
Sorry, I hit send before I was finished. As I was saying:We are concerned that it will be difficult to collect the WVO in the winter because it will be solid. The company uses a heating element on the collection trunk, but we'll just be sucking it out with a hose. Does anyone know how we should heat up the WVO in order to extract it? Also, if it becomes necessary to collect the WVO in our own tanks, does anyone have any idea where we could find something like that?
Will
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] BD use cannot void engine warranty

2006-09-10 Thread Will Kelleher
Hey all,Has anyone ever seen this? http://www.sqbiofuels.com/faq.htm#q6Will
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Keith Addison
No Keith, that's not what I'm saying.

A lie is a lie, regardless of who tells it. If  President Bush did 
the things that made Clinton famous, or infamous, I'd be screaming 
for him to be impreached too. There are things that the President is 
doing, as well as not doing, that I take exception to. I don't see 
the present administration threatening to pull the license of 
a broadcast network, or trying violate ABC's First Amendment 
Right, but the Democrat/Liberals are. They're calling out the 
figurative Storm Troopers, which is the typical scare tactic.

Er, you haven't noticed the current administration's antics with the 
FCC, eg, and with just about every media protection the US ever had? 
Maybe you sh (a) wake up just a little and (b) do some homework (a 
helluva lot) - the list archives is a great place to start.

Best

Keith


Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb
 bowling balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini
 series anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy
 will stand up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to
 sunlight.

So Gregg, it doesn't matter if it's all lies and disinfo just as long
as it supports the good guys (Republicans) and attacks the evil ones
(Clinton), is that what you're saying?

Best

Keith


 Mike Weaver wrote:
 
  
  
  This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US
  Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's
  not even
  funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative,
  against
  Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire
  Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious
  trouble.
  
  Read it, then read my analysis of it below:
  September 7, 2006
  
  Mr. Robert A. Iger
  President and CEO
  The Walt Disney Company
  500 South Buena Vista Street
  Burbank CA 91521
  
  Dear Mr. Iger,
  
  We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The
  Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from
  experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious
  inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people
  about the
  tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore,
  the
  manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised
  suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a
  major and
  well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to
  cancel
  this broadcast to cease Disneyâ*™s plans to use it as a teaching tool in
  schools
  across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and
  factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children
  would be a
  gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law,
  to
  your shareholders, and to the nation.
  
  The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast
  license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle
  obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the
  public interest.
  Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty
  of
  broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open
  and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.
  
  Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission
  Report
  and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it.
  The
  9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11
  attacks,
  and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very
  events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by
  any
  who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational
  program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment,
  â*œWhen you
  take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important
  event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.â*
  
  Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.
  
  Despite claims by your networkâ*™s representatives that The Path to 9/11
  is
  based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves,
  as
  well as other experts on the issues, disagree.
  
  Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners
  who
  recently viewed the program, said, â*œAs we were watching, we were trying
  to
  think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commissionâ*™s findings
  the way
  that they had.â* [â*œ9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and
  Biased,â*
  New York Times, September 6, 2006]
  
  Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security
  advisor to ABC has described the program as â*œdeeply flawedâ* and said
  of the
  programâ*™s depiction 

Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Keith Addison
Gregg,
I don't mean to get you too upset.  But, hypocracy runs thick 
when it comes to this mini-series.  I don't doubt that Clinton's 
administration could have done things differently but remember, the 
attack came on BushCo's watch and the seeds were planted over 
several years.

On Sunday, September 10, 2006  6:28 PM, Gregg Davidson wrote:
   Bush Lied! Bush Lied!! Bush Lied!!! Can't you people come up 
with something better than that?

Its interesting, they impeached Clinton for a lie.  The country was 
outraged at such an atrocity as a lie to the nation.  Would you 
suggest a lie about illicit sex is worse then a lie that has led to 
the deaths of the US's service men and women?

I believe some foreign civilians might have been killed too, just in 
case anyone's interested.

ICH: 62,006 - 180,000, The number killed in the 'war on terror'
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14906.htm

Number Of Iraqi Civilians Slaughtered In America's War? As Many As 250,000
http://www.marchforjustice.com/shockawe.php

Eg. And the rest!

All strangely invisible from within the borders of the US somehow.

Best

Keith


Or a lie about why 3000 people lost their lives in 9/11?

 
   I'm so sorry we pissed off Uncle Osama. We'd better not make 
him mad or he'll do some really mean like call the ACLU on us.

Hey, I would love to see Osama captured.  But blaming his actions on 
one presidency only serves those who would hide from the truth.  And 
my suggestion that Clinton was no more at fault then the two 
presidents previous to him (not even including Eisenhower's 
successful attempt at destabilizing Iran) still stands.  Thus, to 
propagate a story that places blame for 9/11 at the feet of the 
Clinton administration is not only unfair but down right unpatriotic 
and un-American.  Its deplorable to those who suffered loss to lie 
about why and how it happened.

-dave


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Sunflower Woes

2006-09-10 Thread Keith Addison
Keith Addison wrote:

 DIY, cheap as junk:
 
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/oilpress.html
 The Sunflower Seed Huller and Oil Press
 
 

I've been to the JTF site dozens of times.  Why have I never seen
that???  You're a wealth of info, Keith, and I'm printing as I write.
Thank you!

:-) You are most welcome.

Robert, we loved your amazing sunflower! LOL! If your lad had climbed 
up to the top of it I reckon he'd have found a giant sleeping in a 
castle up there in the clouds. Thanks for sending the pic - I'll 
upload it and post a ref. for the list.

All best

Keith


robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread Jason Katie
oh, PLEASE, you two. why cant we agree that all presidents are idiots no 
matter how many degrees they have(or dont have), and also agree that the 
present one has stepped in a pretty big pile. and we the people usually 
get caught in the middle regardless of affiliation,?

this would be a REAL step in the right direction.
Jason
ICQ#:  154998177
MSN:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Gregg Davidson

To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Disney




Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah! And I wish Clinton's legacy would stop forcing us to borrow all
that money - what is it - 2 billion a week?

And I'm really mad about Clinton's Legacy making up all those stories
about WMD in Iraq! Der Schlickmeister didn't make up any stories during 
his reign. Everything he said was honest to God fact.


And I really wish Clinton's Legacy would follow through on its promise
to catch Osama bin Laden. I do too. He was only interested in getting BJ's 
in the Oral Orifice.


Stop it, Clinton's Legacy, Stop it now! You're all to blame. I'm not at 
fault, I was dumb enough to vote for him.






Gregg Davidson wrote:


I hope Disney grows some major cojones, ones the size of 16lb bowling
balls, calls the Democrat/Liberal bluff,  runs the mini series
anyway. Sounds to me like the Clinton Admistration's Legacy will stand
up to what's in the mini series like a vampire does to sunlight.

*/Mike Weaver /* wrote:



This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of
the US
Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of
Disney, it's
not even
funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative,
against
Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the
entire
Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in
serious
trouble.

Read it, then read my analysis of it below:
September 7, 2006

Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521

Dear Mr. Iger,

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming
broadcast of The
Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless
reports from
experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and
serious
inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the
American people
about the
tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day.
Furthermore,
the
manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and
advertised
suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like
Disney and a
major and
well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to
cancel
this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching
tool in
schools
across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and
factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to
children
would be a
gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to
the law,
to
your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free
broadcast
license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle
obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the
public interest.
Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in
the duty
of
broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting
an open
and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission
Report
and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign
for it.
The
9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11
attacks,
and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed,
the very
events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme
care by
any
who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or
educational
program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment,
“When you
take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an
important
event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.�

Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.

Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path
to 9/11
is
based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners
themselves,
as
well as other experts on the issues, disagree.

Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11
Commissioners
who
recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we
were trying
to
think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s
findings
the way
that they had.� [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate
and
Biased,�
New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national
security
advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed�
and said
of the
program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an
intelligence
agent,

Re: [Biofuel] Cold Weather Collection and Other Questions

2006-09-10 Thread Jason Katie



are you using a big hopper 
ordrums?
if you are usingyour ownhopper, i 
probably wont be of much help, but drums can be picked up with a 2 wheeled 
dolley and loaded onto a truck with atommy lift, a minimum of 
equipment.
the only thing i can think of for a hopper would be 
to borrow one of the bigger maintenance tractors and cart it off that way, 
because heating it would require either a LOT of time to heat from the truck 
power, or to run up the shop owner's power bill with a constant heater (which i 
highly doubt they will appreciate). 
my personal suggestion is to place a 55 gal drum 
and have the owner fillthat before theystart onto the 
reclaimer's hopper. that should give plenty for experimenting, and is expandable 
as needed, just add drums.

JasonICQ#: 154998177MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Will 
  Kelleher 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:58 
  PM
  Subject: [Biofuel] Cold Weather 
  Collection and Other Questions
  Sorry, I hit send before I was finished. As I was 
  saying:We are concerned that it will be difficult to collect the WVO 
  in the winter because it will be solid. The company uses a heating 
  element on the collection trunk, but we'll just be sucking it out with a 
  hose. Does anyone know how we should heat up the WVO in order to extract 
  it? Also, if it becomes necessary to collect the WVO in our own tanks, 
  does anyone have any idea where we could find something like that? 
  Will
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/442 - Release Date: 
  9/8/2006
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/442 - Release Date: 9/8/2006
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Disney

2006-09-10 Thread DHAJOGLO
Very good point, Keith.  Though, invisible would give us an excuse. I would say 
conveniently ignored.


From: Keith Addison
I believe some foreign civilians might have been killed too, just in
case anyone's interested.

ICH: 62,006 - 180,000, The number killed in the 'war on terror'
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14906.htm

Number Of Iraqi Civilians Slaughtered In America's War? As Many As 250,000
http://www.marchforjustice.com/shockawe.php

Eg. And the rest!

All strangely invisible from within the borders of the US somehow.

Best

Keith




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] BD use cannot void engine warranty

2006-09-10 Thread Jason Katie



woud the dissolution of a gasket be considered fuel 
damage or a component failure, though? i can just about guarantee that theyll 
say even ASTM biodiesel caused the failure thus voiding the warranty on the 
grounds of "external influences" .

JasonICQ#: 154998177MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Will 
  Kelleher 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:49 
  PM
  Subject: [Biofuel] BD use cannot void 
  engine warranty
  Hey all,Has anyone ever seen this? http://www.sqbiofuels.com/faq.htm#q6Will
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch 
  the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/442 - Release Date: 
  9/8/2006
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/442 - Release Date: 9/8/2006
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/