Re: [Biofuel] Pimentel is at it again

2005-07-06 Thread desertstallion
FWIW - My cat drinks milk from cows.

Derek

 -- Original message --
From: "Ken Dunn - CountyEarth.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Keith,
> 
> Your make many points that give me reason for pause.  However, I can 
> wait for someone else to do something about the problems that exist or I 
> can do something myself - done!  The majority of U.S. citizens will 
> continue to eat meat and larger quantities than responsible and probably 
> of the cheapest factory farmed variety.  I think that the animals not 
> being raised for my personal consumption will benefit everyone more than 
> were I to eat meat because of the benefit that it might hold for 
> fertilization.  Hopefully,  I can offset the over consuption and 
> thoughtless consumption of one other person.  And we all know that we 
> can't change anyone else.  I have always thought of this as my 
> contribution to the environment - hopefully just one of many.
> 
> A point of interest, though,  I don't know of any animal aside from 
> humans that consume the milk of another animal, though, I'm sure there 
> probably is at least one.  Can someone name one?  However, the concept 
> of consuming the lactic fluids from a bovine seems rather bizarre.  
> Those which are intended for its offspring as all milk is.  I'm pretty 
> sure that I can do without bovine hormones and antibodies.
> 
> Take care,
> Ken
> 
> ___
> Biofuel mailing list
> Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
> 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Mileage on diesel trucks...

2005-03-09 Thread desertstallion

Hi,
I think it varies by feedstock, but my understanding is that there is slightly 
less energy per volume of veg oil/biodiesel. Therefore, when you switch to veg 
oil/biodiesel from regular diesel the mileage per gallon drops slightly...it 
doesn't improve. But, the fuel is better environmentally and should be cheaper. 
Even if the engine uses a bit more per mile, overall it should still be cheaper 
than regular diesel.
Most of these trucks are geared low and that is why the mileage is dismal. I 
had a friend who consistently got over 20 mpg with the same truck you have. 
But, he had added a Gearvendors overdrive unit. I have a 1987 F-350 with the 
International 6.9 NA Diesel engine. When I bought it, it was only getting 12 
mpg due to a low differential. I put in a Gearvendors overdrive unit and the 
RPMs dropped by 500 for a given speed and it got an additional 5 mpg. It now 
consistently gives 17 mpg.
Derek

 -- Original message --
From: "Busyditch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Go here for some stats
> http://www.greasel.com/News.html

> - Original Message - 
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 11:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Mileage on diesel trucks...
> 
> 
> >
> > I have a 1995 3/4 ton Dodge with a Cummings diesel.  It has 250,000 miles
> on it. I bought it used.  I get 15-17 MPG out of it on regular diesel.  I
> thought these engines got better mileage.  What do you get?
> > I have not tried bio-diesel yet.  I will install a in-line fuel filter in
> the spring and try some.
> > Farmer Paul
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Factory farms vs. large cities

2005-03-08 Thread desertstallion

True, but often the cow is already out of the barn, so to say. One day we may 
be wise enough to  prevent...but, right now, I would at least like to see 
something useful done with all the carcasses.
Derek

 -- Original message --
From: "Appal Energy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Although I understand the need to stop the spread of disease,
> > the sight of all those animals just bulldozed into trenches is to
> > me the epitomy of horrible waste. How much better if they
> > could have been rendered to biodiesel.
> 
> How much better if they were never amassed in such concentrations in the 
> first place and the destruction was eliminated due to the non-existance of 
> mono-culture practices?
> 
> Heal the patient, not the symptom.
> 
> Todd Swearingen
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Factory farms vs. large cities
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> > Relax...nothing was personal...you brought up some valid stuff, and 
> > basically everyone is agreeing with you...but, also trying to point out 
> > some additional nuances to all this. One of my beefs, has been all the 
> > waste associated with herd culls in the UK and elsewhere to halt the 
> > spread of disease. I don't recall the actual numbers, but I think it was 
> > in the million head of cattle range that were put down during the mad cow 
> > scare. IIRC there was a similar huge culling when swine flu was detected 
> > in the UK. When the Nipah virus was loose in Indonesia many thousands of 
> > pigs were destroyed. Currently they have been putting down millions of 
> > chickens due to the fear of bird flu in Southeast Asia. I'm sure there are 
> > many more examples. Although I understand the need to stop the spread of 
> > disease, the sight of all those animals just bulldozed into trenches is to 
> > me the epitomy of horrible waste. How much better if they could have been 
> > rendered to biodiesel.
> > Regards,
> > Derek
<>
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Factory farms vs. large cities

2005-03-08 Thread desertstallion

Hi,
Relax...nothing was personal...you brought up some valid stuff, and basically 
everyone is agreeing with you...but, also trying to point out some additional 
nuances to all this. One of my beefs, has been all the waste associated with 
herd culls in the UK and elsewhere to halt the spread of disease. I don't 
recall the actual numbers, but I think it was in the million head of cattle 
range that were put down during the mad cow scare. IIRC there was a similar 
huge culling when swine flu was detected in the UK. When the Nipah virus was 
loose in Indonesia many thousands of pigs were destroyed. Currently they have 
been putting down millions of chickens due to the fear of bird flu in Southeast 
Asia. I'm sure there are many more examples. Although I understand the need to 
stop the spread of disease, the sight of all those animals just bulldozed into 
trenches is to me the epitomy of horrible waste. How much better if they could 
have been rendered to biodiesel.
Regards,
Derek

 -- Original message --
From: "Bo Lozoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Aw, come on guys! Please don't try to turn me into a cardboard stereotypical 
> idiot; I don't appreciate it. Kim, where on earth did I ever say anyone who 
> raises animals for meat is like a slaveholder??? I said I raise animals too, 
> and eat their meat when I need to. And I ALSO said factory farming is evil, 
> and you and your husband do NOT FACTORY FARM!
> 
> Just leave it alone, okay? You're twisting this all out of its original 
> context and fighting a battle that doesn't exist. Jeez, I'm a farmer, for 
> God's sake. Factory farms are not farms, they are factories. I have never 
> said anything that lumps you and your husband into all of that, so please 
> stop defending yourself. I'm not your enemy. And I repeat, no biodiesel 
> producer is going to be getting millions of gallons of lard or tallow from 
> humane family farms such as yours. You're obscuring the original point of 
> this e-mail dialogue, which was about huge quantities of animal wastes, not 
> a gallon from a goat.
> 
> And Keith, you remind me a little of one of the talk show hosts -- no one 
> ever comes out better than you on your own listserve. In each of our 
> exchanges you found a way to chide me a little even when we were saying 
> practically the same thing. I'm not interested in wasting my time with 
> banter and petty argument. Punch my name up on Google and you'll see that 
> I'm one of the good guys just like you. Stop trying to make me wrong and 
> we'll get along a lot better.
> 
> This is my last entry into this beef (excuse the pun).
> 
> Bo Lozoff
> 
> >From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Factory farms vs. large cities
> >Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:50:45 +0900
> >
> >Hi Doug
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Here is how my simple mind sees the situation. Unless a drastic event
> >>take place to grossly reduce the human population, humans concentrated in
> >>cities will remain a fact.  As long as  humans desire to consume animals 
> >>for
> >>food the concentration of animals will remain a fact as well.  Even if it
> >>where possible to spread out the human and animal population over the
> >>available land, I'm unsure if nature could safely process the waste
> >>generated.  To me we are going to be left with figuring out how to deal 
> >>with
> >>both confined animal and confined human waste.  Yes the animals should be
> >>treated humanely, but the problem has always been defining humane.
> >>Doug, N0LKK
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>--
> >
> >Not true. It's possible to raise the amount of meat required in sustainable 
> >ways, which includes processing the waste in sustainable ways too - in fact 
> >it relies on that.
> >
> >See, for instance:
> >Ley Farming
> >http://journeytoforever.org/farm_library.html#ley
> >
> >BUT that will not leave room for the current insane game of using (up) most 
> >of the land and most of the resources (including horrendous quantities of 
> >fossil fuels at every turn) to raise ag. commodities disguised as "food" 
> >for The Few to play casinos with (eg ADM, Cargill, Monsanto et al), at 
> >everybody else's expense. Back to real farming, in other words. And that's 
> >not a choice or an option or an alternative, it's an absolute and urgent 
> >necessity.
> >
> >As for human wastes, the main problem is what goes into the sewage system 
> >these days. People add all sorts of stuff that shouldn't be there and 
> >didn't used to be 50 years ago when people like Wylie solved the problems 
> >of urban composting of human wastes. Misha Gale-Sinex just sent this to 
> >SANET, for instance:
> >
> >>My problems with this--and something I'd want to see much more
> >>research on before I chose to ever use human manure compost of
> >>uncertain origin as a farm input--are rooted in what I used to hear
> >>from chemists in Philly and elsewhere who worked i

Re: [Biofuel] Best WVO for GM Dura-max

2005-03-07 Thread desertstallion

Hi,
I don't believe that the Duramax, the engine designed by Isusu, was introduced 
by GM until 2001. The 6.5 engine you are referring to in the 1995 model year is 
a totally different engine. Unless, of course, someone changed the engine to 
the more recent Duramax.
Welcome to the list,
Derek

-- Original message from "Busyditch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
-- 


> Hello list members 
> I am now the owner of 2 diesel vehicles. My trusty Golf TDi (B20 only, for 
> now)has been joined by a 1995 Chevy 2500 pickup with the 6.5 liter Duramax 
> TurboDiesel. I intend on converting to WVO using the Greasecar kit, mainly 
> because I like the <1 minute purge feature. I was wondering if any members 
> have experience with this engine using WVO, and if there are any problems to 
> converting to WVO. Also I need to know what kind of WVO is recommended to 
> use, as I have a wide variety of restaurants here to choose from. And if 
> there are issues to what kind of processing I use on my WVO to make it 
> friendly to my truck. Thanks to all who suppport this list, looking forward 
> to becoming fossil free. 
> j hajeski 
> 
> 
> ___ 
> Biofuel mailing list 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html 
> 
> Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): 
> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion

2005-02-08 Thread desertstallion

Hi,
I have to echo what Hakan has said, and what Keith has said on other occasions. 
With the exception of a few hotspots I find that people are pretty tolerant of 
others. As long as someone traveling realizes that the are a guest, and act as 
a guest, they are generally well accepted regardless of whichever country they 
hail from. Many people have issues with the US government. LOL - I have issues 
with the US government. But, they don't necessarily carry that over to their 
relationships with US citizens.
So, if one travels with a low profile, dresses modestly, listens rather than 
talks, tries to learn rather than to teach, has a bit of humility rather than 
arrogance, etc., I don't think they should hesitate to travel.
Derek

-- Original message from Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
- 
> Luc, 
> 
> I do not think that the climate have changed that much, when it comes to 
> individuals that travel. This of course assuming that you are not going 
> directly to the trouble spots. It was interesting to see that you have been 
> in Western Samoa, which I found to be one of the true paradises left on 
> earth. Small country with a population like a medium size city and one of 
> the poorest in the world. Despite that poverty and bad health normally 
> goes together, they are an exception and one of the healthiest. I was 
> there around 20 years ago and stayed at Aggie Gray's bungalow hotel, this 
> when she was still alive and around 90 years old. Quite a tough lady with a 
> very large family. 
> 
> I am 63 now and my wife 57, we still enjoy travelling very much and have 
> been in around 60 countries each, my travelling has been mostly in business 
> and my wife mostly as tourist. Our trip to Vietnam last year, was 
> interesting and we enjoyed it very much. 
> 
> Hakan 
> 
> 
> At 01:59 PM 2/7/2005, you wrote: 
> >G'day Derek; 
> >Not my sister, someone else's, however you make interesting points. I have 
> >lived in Canada, the US, New Zealand and Australia and have travelled to 
> >New Caledonia, Fiji, Tahiti, as well as The Samoas (Western and American) 
> >and can say with all assuredness that it certainly IS an education. 
> >The return to North America was rather brutal after having been away for 
> >about 8 years, and this back in the 80's before the increased insanity. 
> >Being the little white ball between a European spouse and a US family has 
> >got to be highly interesting. "Old Europe" has a much longer history and 
> >much more culture than the US ever will, so there is inevitably a clash, ha! 
> >Back a few years ago I was a advocate of people getting out and traveling 
> >the world, especially young people. Good for the mental processes, however 
> >of late I am no longer certain travel is a good idea given the climate 
> >that has been created, not that it still wouldn't benefit, there is just 
> >so much more animocity out there now, and well deserved I might add. 
> >Luc 
> >- Original Message - From: 
> >To: 
> >Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 5:25 AM 
> >Subject: Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion 
> > 
> > 
> >>Hi Luc, 
> >> 
> >>As I believe you said that your sister was thinking of moving to Europe 
> >>from her homeland for a bit of fresh air, I might mention that I am a US 
> >>expatriate. I've lived overseas now for a total of fifteen years. The 
> >>reasons were varied, partly economic, partly to reduce work stress, and 
> >>partly to improve my family life. I am also married to a European, which 
> >>leads to some interesting (dis)harmonies as I constantly hear a European 
> >>viewpoint in one ear and a US viewpoint in the other from my US family. 
> >>The so called reverse culture shock is also interesting. Many things that 
> >>before would have been so normal as to not even have reached the surface 
> >>of my awareness now cause discomfort. It has been an education and a 
> >>valued one. 
> >> 
> >>I would encourage her to go. It would be an adventure and an education 
> >>and I don't think she would ever regret it. I know we haven't. 
> >> 
> >>Derek  
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion

2005-02-08 Thread desertstallion

Hi Robert,

Sorry I was confused as to whose sister was whose!

Just one further comment along these lines. I've been married now for about 20 
years. We get along pretty well and I think we have a good understanding of 
what makes each other tick. BUT, sometimes I think my wife can run into someone 
from her hometown whom she has never seen before and know more about him in the 
first five minutes and what he is thinking that she does about me after all 
these years. And, vice versa. There is just such a deep common proverbial 
understanding on so many issues when they have the same background. I wouldn't 
have believed it if I hadn't experienced it myself.
Derek
-- Original message from robert luis rabello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
-- 

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> > Hi Luc, 
> > 
> > As I believe you said that your sister was thinking of moving to Europe 
> > from 
> her homeland for a bit of fresh air 
> 
> Uh, Derek, that would be MY sister! 
> 
> > I might mention that I am a US expatriate. I've lived overseas now for a 
> > total 
> of fifteen years. 
> 
> I moved to Canada in 1992. It's been an enlightening experience to 
> live as a guest in someone else's country. 
> 
> > I am also married to a European, which leads to some interesting 
> (dis)harmonies as I constantly hear a European viewpoint in one ear and a US 
> viewpoint in the other from my US family. 
> 
> It's nice to know I'm not the only one who experiences this 
> "disharmony". Sometimes, I'm astonished at the contrast in 
> perspectives, given that we live relatively close to one another, 
> speak the same language and share many cultural values. Some 
> Americans think that Canada is either one step away from communist, or 
> so very much the same that there are no significant differences 
> between the countries. There certainly ARE differences, but they are 
> subtle. 
> 
> > It has been an education and a valued one. 
> 
> Indeed! 
> > 
> > I would encourage her to go. It would be an adventure and an education and 
> > I 
> don't think she would ever regret it. I know we haven't. 
> 
> She's been to Europe a few times already and really appreciates the 
> diversity of views and experience there. Europe is not without its 
> problems, however, and she's not naive. I would be sad to see her go, 
> only because she would be very far away, and at times, she seems like 
> the only thinking person in my entire family. 
> 
> robert luis rabello 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Swiss government: was Re: [Biofuel] OOPS (typo) -- sorry Kieth

2005-02-07 Thread desertstallion

Hi,
Hi Mike, et. al.,
Well if we had more choices there might be less of a need for negative voting. 
What I mean is that it seems like a long long time since either of the two 
parties have put up candidates whom I wanted to vote for. Rather, I find myself 
voting for the one I least dislike.
Derek


 -- Original message --
From: Michael Redler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks Doug,
>  
> I think nitpicking (as you say) is allowed in this forum.
>  
> It's always good to have someone around who is interested in checking the 
> details.
>  
> The only additional thing I would encourage is to look for what can't be 
> found 
> in print. "The proof of the pudding is in the tasting" and sometimes required 
> a 
> plane ticket.
>  
> One side note: I wonder what would happen if we had a coalition government, 
> required to "play nice" with six or eight political parties and forced to 
> negotiate our differences. As it is, we have difficulty with only two. :-)
>  
> Mike
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With apologies for nitpicking, herewith some extracts from
> "Political Switzerland", a small book by Oswald Sigg (Zurich: Pro
> Helvetia, 1997):
> 
> "The Swiss Government is called the Federal Council. It consists of seven
> members and is headed for a period of one year by a president elected from
> among the Federal Council members."
> 
> "Ever since 1944, the [party] composition of the government has remained
> the same..."
> 
> "The Federal Council is elected by Parliament every four years (both
> chambers meet in the National Council Hall)..."
> 
> "The meetings of the Federal Council are chaired by the President of the
> Confederation who is elected for one year only from among the Federal
> Councillors. He is thus something in the nature of a prime Minister ad
> interim whose office consists first and foremost of chairing the meetings
> of the Federal Council and performing certain representative duties.
> During his year as president he also continues to be head of his own
> department. Switzerland has no actual head of state. When a foreign head
> of state, or even a queen, visits Berne [the capital of Switzerland],
> they are usually received by all seven members of the Federal Council."
> 
> "Each member of the Federal Council is the head of a department, or of
> what would be known abroad as a ministry. There are just seven such
> departments in Switzerland, so that each head of department is responsible
> for several sub-divisions which usually correspond to several ministries
> abroad."
> 
> "The Swiss Parliament, the Federal Assembly, is made up of two chambers:
> the National Council, with 200 members, and the Council of States, with 46
> members [2 per canton = U.S. state or Canadian province]."
> 
> The Assembly is elected by proportional representation. In 1995 it
> contained four relatively large parties and 8 small ones.
> 
> Since the party composition of the government hasn't changed since 1944
> and elections are likely to affect only personalities and particular
> measures, the turnout for elections to the Assembly tends to be low; 42.2%
> in 1995.
> 
> By petition of 50,000 citizens within 90 days of the passage of a law, it
> may be required to be ratified by a referendum.
> 
> In the cantons, proposals for laws may be put forward by a petition
> to be submitted to a referendum. The Federal Constitution is also subject
> to change through an initiative by petition of 100,000 citizens, followed
> by a referendum.
> 
> Doug Woodard
> St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Michael Redler wrote:
> 
> > ...for what it's worth, My grandmother's house is only 400+ years old. 
> Freudian slip? :-)
> >
> > Michael Redler wrote:Hi Kieth,
> >
> > There's a lot of stuff you threw out there. To address it all would take a 
> heck of a lot of time -- suffice to say that I agree with most of it.
> >
> > Switzerland: If part of it's government was based on the US constitution, 
> > you 
> wouldn't know it. It gained it's Independence over 700 years ago and I think 
> they had it pretty much nailed down before Jefferson put pen to paper. I 
> visited 
> my grandmother two weeks ago as I've done almost every year since I was an 
> infant. Her 700+ year old house is a testament to their cautious attitude 
> toward 
> "progress" (I'm alluding to housing development).
> >
> > You are right about voting. Before my Aunt could build her new house, it 
> > had 
> to be approved by those in her neighborhood. She, in fact, had to build a 
> stick 
> frame of the house to show its size and shape and offer a visual aid for all 
> who 
> would approve it (or not).
> >
> > "Presidents": They have seven of them, representing all of the regions of 
> > the 
> confederation. Since Switzerland has four national languages, They are 
> usually 
> fluent in two or three of them (German French Italian and Rhetto-Romanish). 
> This 
> makes me wonder about the whole one 

[Biofuel] Gobal Warming - Ice Buffering

2005-02-07 Thread desertstallion

Recently there have been many news reports concerning global warming, some of 
which have discussed the melting of huge amounts of glacial ice from the poles 
and high mountain ranges. Often, there is also mention of the fact that the 
actual global temperature has risen very little. What I haven't seen is anyone 
putting the two together. The same as in a buffered chemical or physiological 
system, I feel that the vast amount of ice in place on the earth is acting as a 
buffer. The same way that external measurements of a buffered chemical reaction 
will change very little despite radical changes within the system, I feel that 
the measured average temperature of the earth can be expected to change 
relatively little due to the absorption by the glacial ice of tremendous 
amounts of heat as it melts. In addition to all the potential problems caused 
by this melting ice on sea level, changes of sea water salinity, and sea water 
temperature, one may expect to see dramatic changes in global temperature once 
this buffer is exhausted. Let us not be mislead by assumptions that the earth 
might only see up to ten degrees of change. I don't think anyone has much of a 
clue as to the actual amount of heat that is being produced and absorbed into 
the ice. Once the ice is gone, we might really start cooking around here.

Derek
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion

2005-02-07 Thread desertstallion

Hi Keith, et. al.,

Yes, that is what I had in mind. Kim had mentioned how much she valued the 
interaction on this list, something that I also value, and feel that many 
value. It is/has been an education and even an inspiration. At the same time, 
for the world in general, I feel that to move forward on many fronts we need 
something of a paradigm shift. I have also just about given up on the 
leadership of my home country (USA) and many others to actually lead us toward 
a better future. I see us stuck in a rut and going the wrong way extremely 
fast! I think the needed change will have to come from the bottom rather than 
from the top. I see the Internet as one way to promote communication between 
people, without intermediaries and their spin. Hakan mentioned the below quoted 
bit about the influence each person can have on so many others. This led me to 
think of the potential for global change that our conversations here on this 
list, across so many frontiers, cultures, religions, languages, etc., may 
possibly have.

Derek

-- Original message from Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
-- 


> Hello Derek 
> 
> >Hi, 
> > 
> ><> 
> > > 
> > > Yes, VERY many! And I don't believe you're passive about it, and not 
> > > without any effect. Your sister's not alone in wanting to leave, and 
> > > certainly not to be blamed for it either (not that I could blame 
> > > anyone for such a thing, with all my comings and goings for most of 
> > > my life!). But think of what Hakan's just been telling Luc about how 
> > > many other Iraqis one dead Iraqi will influence - one living American 
> > > who feels strongly about these things, even if she moves to Europe, 
> > > will influence just as many others: that's not to say convince, 
> > > necessarily, but influence, sway, yes. And there are many millions of 
> > > you. 
> > 
> >That has me wondering how many people about the world the almost 
> >3000 members of this List influence. 
> 
> Well, this is what Hakan said: 
> 
> >If you look at behavioral statistics for the humans, the mathematics 
> >goes like this, 
> > 
> >- On average a person will have and can manage around 10 very close 
> >relationship on the level of family and relatives. The 300,000 
> >killed, represent 3 million who lost a family member, killed by US. 
> >If anyone killed members of your family, how good is the chance that 
> >you are more inclined to join the resistance, instead of giving the 
> >killers your "hearts and mind"? 
> > 
> >- On average a person have around 30 close friends, with frequent 
> >contacts. The 300,00 killed, represent that around 9 million people 
> >lost a friend, killed by US. If anyone killed your friend, how good 
> >is the chance that you are more inclined to join the resistance, 
> >instead of giving the killers your "hearts and mind"? 
> > 
> >- On average a person have around 60 people, that he/she know and 
> >have infrequent contacts with. The 300,000 killed, represent that 
> >around 18 million people knew someone killed by US. If anyone killed 
> >someone you knew, how good is the chance that you are more inclined 
> >to join the resistance, instead of giving the killers your "hearts 
> >and mind"? 
> > 
> >If you only think about the above, almost all Iraqis have been 
> >touched by a killing performed by US ... 
> 
> I'm sure Hakan's got it right, as usual. 
> 
> I read once that if four people sat down together at a table, between 
> them, and the people they knew, and the people *they* knew, and so on 
> and on, they were connected with everyone in the world... and I could 
> never figure out whether that was far-fetched or not. 
> 
> Maybe not. 
> 
> >Change only takes a few, and they're always there and ready for it 
> >when the time comes, when the time is right society responds and is 
> >renewed. 
> 
> Or as Margaret Mead said (and Toynbee, and Jung): "Never 
> underestimate the power 
> of a small group of individuals to change the world. In fact, it is 
> the only thing that ever has." 
> 
> We can but hope. 
> 
> Regards 
> 
> Keith 
> 
> >Derek Hargis 
> > 
> > 
> > > Best wishes 
> > > 
> > > Keith 
> > > 
> > > >robert luis rabello 
> 
> ___ 
> Biofuel mailing list 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html 
> 
> Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): 
> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion

2005-02-07 Thread desertstallion

Hi Luc,

As I believe you said that your sister was thinking of moving to Europe from 
her homeland for a bit of fresh air, I might mention that I am a US expatriate. 
I've lived overseas now for a total of fifteen years. The reasons were varied, 
partly economic, partly to reduce work stress, and partly to improve my family 
life. I am also married to a European, which leads to some interesting 
(dis)harmonies as I constantly hear a European viewpoint in one ear and a US 
viewpoint in the other from my US family. The so called reverse culture shock 
is also interesting. Many things that before would have been so normal as to 
not even have reached the surface of my awareness now cause discomfort. It has 
been an education and a valued one.

I would encourage her to go. It would be an adventure and an education and I 
don't think she would ever regret it. I know we haven't.

Derek
-- Original message from "Legal Eagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
-- 


> G'day Derek; 
> 
> We all have influence. There isn't a single person alive that doesn't have 
> it, at least in their own parameters, some more, some less, but all have it. 
> The trick/solution when combining cultures and traditions is not so much to 
> create a "melting pot" where all become one with different shades of colour, 
> but rather where all can co-habitate while continuing with their traditions 
> and cultural heritage where they are but without infriging upon the right of 
> others to do the same. Where modifications to this comes nto play is where 
> those certain cultural heritages clash violently or where the host country's 
> traditions and culture is cast aside and a new one attempted to be 
> implanted. Where the later is the case it somewhat negates the reason for 
> one leaving his/her native homeland in the first place eh? Why not just stay 
> there if all is well and no meaningful changes are in order ? 
> It boils down to what a person deems acceptable or not acceptable, livable 
> or intolerable. 
> Luc 
> - Original Message - 
> From: 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 7:40 AM 
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion 
> 
> 
> 
> > That has me wondering how many people about the world the almost 3000 
> > members of this List influence. 
> > 
> > Derek Hargis 
> > 
> > 
> >> Best wishes 
> >> 
> >> Keith 
> >> 
> >> >robert luis rabello 
> > ___ 
> > Biofuel mailing list 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel 
> > 
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html 
> > 
> > Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): 
> > http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ 
> > 
> 
> 
> ___ 
> Biofuel mailing list 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: 
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html 
> 
> Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): 
> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] U.S., Islam, and Religion

2005-02-05 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

<>
> 
> Yes, VERY many! And I don't believe you're passive about it, and not 
> without any effect. Your sister's not alone in wanting to leave, and 
> certainly not to be blamed for it either (not that I could blame 
> anyone for such a thing, with all my comings and goings for most of 
> my life!). But think of what Hakan's just been telling Luc about how 
> many other Iraqis one dead Iraqi will influence - one living American 
> who feels strongly about these things, even if she moves to Europe, 
> will influence just as many others: that's not to say convince, 
> necessarily, but influence, sway, yes. And there are many millions of 
> you. 

That has me wondering how many people about the world the almost 3000 members 
of this List influence.

Derek Hargis


> Best wishes 
> 
> Keith 
> 
> >robert luis rabello 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Indura fabric

2005-01-26 Thread desertstallion

Dear Kim,

Rather than trying to remove the chemicals from the garments, consider trying 
to protect your husband from the garments/chemicals. Would it be feasible for 
him to wear a light cotton undergarment, similar to long underwear underneath 
the uniform. This way the chemicals would not be in direct contact with his 
skin and if the undergarment is washed frequently then leach through would be 
minimized. The idea would be similar to wearing a cotton glove underneath a 
latex glove for people with latex allergies. I understand that you live in 
Texas so the cotton would need to be thin or he might overheat in the summer.

Derek

-- Original message from Kim & Garth Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
-- 


> I would love something environmentally friendly, but we don't have a 
> say. I am wondering, if I do everything they say not to, such as washing 
> the garments with tallow soap, will I get rid of the chemicals? There is 
> no reason for my hubby to need fire protective gear, he has never been 
> involved with a fire in his 16 years with the company. I will not be 
> risking his life in anyway by removing the chemicals. I will be risking 
> him if I don't, especially in the summer in Texas! 
> 
> If there was any solidarity among the workers, we could fight this. The 
> only ones who have opened their mouths have found their work being 
> scrutinized under a fine microscope, if you know what I mean. There were 
> only 2 who cared, besides us. The general attitude is that the company 
> will pay if it harms us, so who cares? 
> 
> Bright Blessings, 
> Kim 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] (no subject)

2005-01-17 Thread desertstallion

Hi 
Wasn't the big magnesium fire in the same Anderson where you live?
Derek

 -- Original message --
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> They might.  Most of the industry here is gone, so it is probably not as big 
> as it once was.  There is still some amount of activity on the west side of 
> town, but not sure if it's Burlington Northern.
> 
> Brian
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Legal Eagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 8:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] (no subject)
> 
> 
> > Doesn't Burlington Northern Trucking have a huge terminal in Anderson ?
<>
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Tripple Purpose Genset

2005-01-07 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

Although this would work, when I looked into similar stuff for power tools, 
etc., I came to the conclusion that it is better to have one gen-set and have 
everything else electric, than to have a bunch of diesel engines about. The 
maintenance is easier, the management of the systems is easier, the noise is 
better contained, and one has greater flexibility. Personally, I would go with 
a biodiesel or veg-oil fired gen-set for electric with co-gen heat for space 
heating. If refrigeration or air-conditioning is needed, go electric for that 
part.

Also, used Isocontainers are relatively easy to purchase if work or storage 
space is needed. They can be delivered and you don't need to worry about the 
wheeled undercarriage of a normal semi-trailer. They are available in a variety 
of sizes and as reefers if insulation is needed. Used rail cars would be 
difficult to move about. I believe the used isocontainers are also cheaper than 
the equivalent sized semi-trailers.

Derek Hargis

 -- Original message --
From: "Legal Eagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> G'day John;
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "John Guttridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 6:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Tripple Purpose Genset
> 
> 
> > G'day Luc,
> >
> > where do you find one of these units and what do they cost?
> 
> At times they can be had where ever they sell and/or restore and/or service 
> refrigerated trailors. You want the diesel powered one. Cost will vary on 
> the used market. New would be in a couple to a few thousand I suspect. They 
> are electronically controlled with a type of "think pad" with all the 
> necessary gauges to let you know if something is amiss.
> I haven't tried out this idea yet although it seems from everything that I 
> have been abel to gather that there is no good reason why it wouldn't work 
> as expected. It is for all intents and purposes a diesel engine like any 
> diesel engine, with battery, fuel pump and filters, electric start and 
> thermometer swith controled. You set the temp you want on the control panel 
> and then when the temp gets there the thermometer tells the unit to stop 
> producing heat/cold. The position of the thermometer's "reader" is 
> important. In a trailer it is behind the back wall where the returning air 
> will hit it and record the inside air temp which it will then aloow the unit 
> to continue cooling/heating or tell it to "standby" until the temp drops/ 
> goes up enough to have it automatically switch on again.They can be set to 
> "continuous" run or "recycle". The later will turn the thing on and off as 
> the need is. The former will run the motor continuously although it will 
> still only heat/cool when the thermometer tells it to. On continuous run it 
> could also be charging a battery bank while waiting for the thermometer to 
> kick in.The power produced would not be for use by the unit itself as it is 
> stand-alone and self sufficient; the power would be for other stuff, like 
> lights or a processor or  other stuff.
> Like I said though, it is still only a work in the ideas stage at this time.
> Oh yeah, on full run all day it will consume about 25 liters fuel. A reafer 
> needs to be fueled every second day when on the road, so does that make it 
> viable ? I've not done any calculations yet.
> Luc
> 
> > John
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] tsunami relief, construction efforts

2005-01-07 Thread desertstallion

Hi,
Consider Habitat for Humanity International.
http://www.habitat.org/
Derek Hargis

 -- Original message --
From: "Doug Younker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As a volunteer for the local ARC chapter I'm unaware of any RC programs that
> plan to use the skills mentioned.  I would suggest first contacting the
> peace corps http://www.peacecorps.gov/ .  Many missionary groups may put his
> skills to use.  In the event one has no particular faith they may contact
> the local ministerial alliance or Salvation Army for more information.
> Doug, N0LKK
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> E Pluribus Unum
> Motto of the USA since 1776
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Legal Eagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] tsunami relief, construction efforts
 
> : 
Red Cross
> : Luc

> : - Original Message - 
> : From: "John Guttridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:06 PM
> : Subject: [Biofuel] tsunami relief, construction efforts
> :
> :
> : > My father is in the construction trade and he asked me last night who he
> : > might ask if his services would be useful in rebuilding things in
> : > tsunami devastated areas, I don't really have those kinds of contacts
> : > but I imagine someone on this list might. does anyone know who he would
> : > contact to offer to go over there and help rebuild?
> : >
> : > John Guttridge
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



[Biofuel] Supermarket Giants Crush Central American Farmers

2005-01-01 Thread desertstallion

The New York Times
December 28, 2004
THE FOOD CHAIN | SURVIVAL OF THE BIGGEST
Supermarket Giants Crush Central American Farmers
By CELIA W. DUGGER

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/28/international/americas/28guatemala.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=

PALENCIA, Guatemala - Mario Chinchilla, his face shaded by a battered straw 
hat, worriedly surveyed his field of sickly tomatoes. His hands and jeans were 
caked with dirt, but no amount of labor would ever turn his puny crop into the 
plump, unblemished produce the country's main supermarket chain displays in its 
big stores.

For a time, the farmer's cooperative he heads managed to sell vegetables to the 
chain, part owned by the giant Dutch multinational, Ahold, which counts Stop & 
Shop among its assets. But the co-op's members lacked the expertise, as well as 
the money to invest in the modern greenhouses, drip irrigation and pest control 
that would have helped them meet supermarket specifications.

Squatting next to his field, Mr. Chinchilla's rugged face was a portrait of 
defeat. "They wanted consistent supply without ups and downs," he said, 
scratching the soil with a stick. "We didn't have the capacity to do it."

Across Latin America, supermarket chains partly or wholly owned by global 
corporate goliaths like Ahold, Wal-Mart and Carrefour have revolutionized food 
distribution in the short span of a decade and have now begun to transform food 
growing, too.

The megastores are popular with customers for their lower prices, choice and 
convenience. But their sudden appearance has brought unanticipated and daunting 
challenges to millions of struggling, small farmers.

The stark danger is that increasing numbers of them will go bust and join 
streams of desperate migrants to America and the urban slums of their own 
countries. Their declining fortunes, economists and agronomists fear, could 
worsen inequality in a region where the gap between rich and poor already yawns 
cavernously and the concentration of land in the hands of an elite has 
historically fueled cycles of rebellion and violent repression.

"It's like being on a train with a glass on a table and it's about to fall off 
and break," said Prof. Thomas Reardon, an agricultural economist at Michigan 
State University. "Everyone sees the glass on the table - but do they see it 
shaking? Do they see the edge? The edge is the structural changes in the 
market."

In the 1990's supermarkets went from controlling 10 to 20 percent of the market 
in the region to dominating it, a transition that took 50 years in the United 
States, according to researchers at Michigan State and the Latin American 
Center for Rural Development in Santiago, Chile.

Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Mexico are furthest along. While the 
changes have happened more slowly in poorer, more rural Central American 
countries, they have begun to quicken here, too. In Guatemala, the number of 
supermarkets has more than doubled in the past decade, as the share of food 
they retail has reached 35 percent.

The hope that small farmers would benefit by banding together in 
business-minded associations has not been borne out. Some like Aj Ticonel, in 
the city of Chimaltenango, have succeeded. But the evidence suggests that the 
failure of Mr. Chinchilla's co-op is the more common fate.

Its feeble attempts to sell to major supermarkets illustrate how the odds are 
stacked against small farmers, as well as the uneven effects of globalization 
itself. Many small farmers in the region are getting left behind, while 
medium-sized and larger growers, with more money and marketing savvy, are far 
more likely to benefit.

Most fruits and vegetables in the region are still sold in small shops and 
open-air markets, but the value of supermarket purchases from farmers has 
soared and now surpasses that of produce exports by two and half times, 
researchers say.

The bottom line: supermarkets and their privately set standards already loom 
larger for many farmers than the rules of the World Trade Organization.

Still, stiff competition from foreign growers is also quite real. To enter the 
supermarkets of Guatemala's dominant supermarket chain, La Fragua - part of a 
holding company one-third owned by Ahold - is to understand why Professor 
Reardon likens them to a Trojan horse for foreign goods.

At La Fragua's immense distribution center in Guatemala City, trucks back into 
loading docks, where electric forklifts unload apples from Washington State, 
pineapples from Chile, potatoes from Idaho and avocados from Mexico.

The produce is trucked from here to the chain's supermarkets, which now span 
the country. Scenes at a mall in Guatemala City anchored by Maxi Bodega, one of 
the company's stores, suggest the evolving nature of grocery shopping for Latin 
America's 512 million people.

On the ground floor was a sprawling, old-fashioned produce market. At the 
entry, there was a shrine to its patron saint, the Virgin of Rosar

[biofuel] New York Times - Heavy Debt and Drought Drive India's Farmers to Desperation

2004-06-06 Thread desertstallion

Heavy Debt and Drought Drive India's Farmers to Desperation
By AMY WALDMAN
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/06/international/asia/06INDI.html?pagewanted=1&th
 
Published: June 6, 2004
 
 
ANANTAPUR, India รท For the 28th time in less than four hours, the telephone in 
the colonial-era district headquarters trilled. 
 
"Hello, help line," Gurram Pramila answered, her pen poised to record yet 
another tale of financial distress. 
 
A 55-year-old farmer who gave his name as Kadirappa was on the line, telling of 
a dry well on his eight acres and his $890 of debt. If the government did not 
help, he vowed, he would kill himself. 
 
Ms. Pramila, a junior bureaucrat untutored in improving mental health, 
improvised. "Don't lose heart," she told Kadirappa. "Have faith in yourself." 
 
The farmer's threat had the force of ominous context. In the past six years, 
2,000 to 3,000 farmers (the state has not compiled an official tally) are 
believed to have committed suicide in this state, Andhra Pradesh, many of them 
in this arid district. Fifty to 100 have killed themselves since a new state 
government took office in mid-May, promising farmers relief. 
 
A help line set up by the government on May 22 had already logged more than 800 
calls a week later. Close to half were from this district, most of them fielded 
by Ms. Pramila. 
 
The template of the calls รท dry land and crushing debt รท never varied, nor did 
their desperate tone. 
 
Nine wells failed on 10 acres owned by a farmer named Umapatty, and he owed 
$4,400 to banks and moneylenders. J. Narayanappa had two dry wells on 20 acres, 
and owed $5,777. Ms. Pramila took down the details, and promised that an 
official would follow up. 
Most of the suicidal farmers have swallowed pesticides, the easiest killer at 
hand. Burdened by compound interest, they compound tragedy, leaving families 
their debts, and depriving them of fathers, husbands and breadwinners.
 
"I would have thrown the pills out," said Pullamma, the haggard widow of Jayram 
Reddy, 52, who killed himself on May 22 by swallowing ammonium phosphate 
tablets in the village of Regadikothur. 
 
He lay down on the family veranda to die, whispering to her that he could not 
bear the burden of more than $6,000 in debt. Now she will go to other farmers' 
fields to labor for 45 cents a day. 
 
India has seen spates of similar suicides in recent years, in states from 
Punjab to Kerala. In part, the suicides reflect a rural culture in which excess 
indebtedness becomes a mark of shame, which private moneylenders and public 
creditors milk to try to collect.
 
But the dead farmers are also the canaries in the mine for India's agricultural 
economy รท indicators of dire straits. Agriculture, which supports two-thirds of 
India's more than one billion people, generates only one-quarter of its gross 
domestic product. In the past five years, while the services sector has grown 
an average of 8 percent a year, agriculture has grown just 2 percent a year. 
 
India's new government rode to power partly on the back of farmers' angst, but 
salving it will not be easy. In the farmers' plight, all the strands of an 
economy in transition intersect. This area had four successive years of 
drought, but the farmers have been buffeted by more than weather. 
 
With small landholdings, constrained markets for their products, and an 
overdependence on subsidies for power and fertilizer, India's farmers were ill 
equipped to compete when the national government undertook economic reforms in 
1991. 
 
To a degree, the suicides reflect the farmers' bafflement at the gradual, and 
erratic, withdrawal of the state. They have felt the cost of reforms รท but have 
yet to see the benefits. 
 
Jayram Reddy was the second farmer in his village to kill himself. On Nov. 20, 
Nagalinga Reddy, no relation, took the same route, using the same method. The 
buildup to his death, at age 50, suggests the confluence of conditions that 
have driven farmers to desperation. 
 
Nagalinga Reddy grew rice and sunflowers. Only 10 of his acres were irrigated. 
He sank five bore wells at a minimum cost of $200 apiece รท but only two struck 
water. 
 
In Nagalinga Reddy's village, the cost of powering the pumps had risen 
sevenfold in recent years, with the state government trying to wean farmers off 
free power. 
 
The cost of fertilizers had risen, too, as the government sought to reduce 
subsides. 
 
Nagalinga Reddy had regularly lost crops to drought, dry wells and pests in the 
past seven years. He had stopped farming cotton because of pests, which drove 
hundreds of farmers to suicide in Warangal, another of the state's districts. 
In October, by the time he scraped together the money to spray his crop, the 
pests had gotten it. 
 
He was $9,000 in debt to three banks, one cooperative society and moneylenders. 
Bank officers regularly came to visit, and one bank took legal action. The 
moneylenders regularly harassed him. He avoided the ignominy of hav

Re: [biofuel] Biodiesel Homebrew Guide was Re: You ought to write a book.

2004-06-01 Thread desertstallion

Hi Mark,

Can the book be purchased as a PDF? Or, on a CD?

Derek




> --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > She did actually have an $8 book (about 80 pages she'd printed out..
> ..
> > it was not published with a hard cover or by a publishing house) 
> that
> > she had written that she was selling at the end of class, as well.  
> I
> > don't know if she has posted a spot online where you can order this
> > (plus shipping, etc.).  I'm sure some of us would rather see her 
> rake
> > in payment-for-valuable information than watch Mr. Tickell rake in
> > money for his work.
> > 
> > That book that she wrote might fit your description, or if she
> > collaborated to have people like Todd or Keith add their own areas 
> in
> > it, or introductions to it, it might help add an extra level of
> > anti-FTFT capability to it maybe just brief essays discussing 
> the
> > importance of countering the bad info that is getting out there.  
> That
> > would add a lot of work though.  Fact is, she seemed to be selling
> > something that might fit your suggestion.
> > 
> > MM
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just got back home from my Arizona trip and am catching up on this and 
> other threads again. I just printed a few more copies of my 'Biodiesel 
> Homebrew Guide' book. It's 85 pages and is available by mail for $10 
> (US, Canada and Mexico) or $14 to other countries. To order it you 
> have to use PayPal- go to PayPal.com to send the appropriate amount to 
> my account which is [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> thanks for the interest,
> 
> mark
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~-> 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: smartcar

2004-05-11 Thread desertstallion

Hi MM,

There are at least a couple of levels to this in Europe. One level is of 
smaller cars. I believe the VW Lupo and the Polo fit here. They are both 
smaller than a Golf/Jetta-Bora/New Beetle, but easily reach highway speeds. 
They can go long distances, albeit one would want to stop and stretch 
frequently. Then, recently I have been seeing more of the three and four wheel 
vehicles which are totally enclosed against the weather and are classed as 
motorcycles. Their classification depends upon the maximum engine displacement, 
which I believe is 50 cc. They don't reach highway speeds and are frequently 
seen tooling along the shoulder of the road being passed by the larger 
vehicles. They are great for city use as they go fast enough for city traffic, 
are much much easier to park, and are relatively inexpensive.

I can still remember something of a 'duh moment' a bit after I first went to 
Europe and I first realixed that the VW Beetle that I considered to be a small 
car, was a large car by the European standards of the time. Still today, one 
sees plenty of the smaller VW Polos and similar sized cars. Clearly there are 
larger vehicles, which are basically the same as the imported European cars 
seen in the US market, but the percentage has to be fairly low. The vast 
majority of the vehicles would appear to be VW Golf sized.

Part of this is the different transportation model seen in Europe when I first 
went there. Cars were mostly used for transportation locally, and often only 
when the city bus wasn't available or convenient. Many people didn't have a 
car. Any travel between cities was by bus or train. I think Europe has moved 
slightly away from this model as cars have become more popular, more divided 
highways have been built, and long distance car travel has become more accepted.

Derek


> Thanks for the info.  If true, this would fill in a gap.  I've heard from
> several builders of proposed "city" type cars, or smaller cars that were at
> highway speeds or maybe only went to city speeds, that some sort of problem 
> like
> this with DOT regs is the factor in preventing them from reasonable access to
> U.S. markets.  The REVA people, when I spoke to them, were already on the road
> with hundreds of cars in India and maybe one or two other places, and were 
> keen
> to come to the US, if not for this type of problem with DOT regs.  The car was
> designed here but had to be made and sold elsewhere.
> 
> Funny, but I've never heard anyone go over this issue outside of these
> discussion groups and outside of industry people.  I don't think I've ever 
> seen
> a news article on it.
> 
> About the Honda you mention: I never knew about that tiny little Honda until I
> saw an ad for their resurrection of the small little convertible idea and they
> had some history of the matter as to the first car they brought here.
> 
> MM
> 
> On Mon, 10 May 2004 08:36:43 +, you wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Back in the mid-70s Honda began importing into the US market their first 
> >car. 
> Earlier they had just imported motocycles. A friend of mine had one and he 
> loved 
> it. Unfortunately, after a couple of years that model was discontinued and 
> Honda 
> only imported larger vehicles. I was told that the DOT regulations were 
> changed 
> to require cars to have a longer wheel base than that early Honda. At the 
> time, 
> I thought it was for safety reasons. Now, I wonder if there wasn't some other 
> reason why those regulations were put into place. Anyway, when I lived in 
> Europe 
> in the 80s, I often saw neat small city cars, like the Fiat 500 and the 
> original 
> Mini. Again, I was told they weren't exported to the US market because they 
> were 
> too small to meet regulations. So...my take on why the VW Lupo and the MB 
> Smart 
> Car aren't in the US market is based on these DOT regulations, not on some 
> sort 
> of problem with the engine. And, that is why they are considering an upsized 
> model of the Smart Car in 2006 for the
> >US market. If we want to see these small fuel efficient models in the US 
> market, even just for city/town use, something needs to be done about the DOT 
> regulations which require a minimum wheel base.
> >
> >Derek
> >
> >
> >> I wonder, will Smart make the little SUV (Smart Urban Vehicle?) weigh in at
> >> 6,000 lbs to qualify for the tax write-off?  ;)
> >> 
> >> Ryan
> >>   -Original Message-
> >>   From: Neoteric Biofuels Inc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>   Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:38 AM
> >>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> >>   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: smartcar
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>   RE: name...Maybe SUV "Sport Utlity Vehicle" is a name that needs
> >>   reclamation anyway...the ones out there now are neither sporty nor
> >>   utilitarian.
> >> 
> >>   Edward Beggs
> >> 
> >> 
> >>   On Thursday, May 6, 2004, at 07:51 PM, Brian wrote:
> >> 
> >>   > "Smart" does have plans to start marketing in the US in 2006.  They
> >>   > are d

RE: [biofuel] Re: smartcar

2004-05-10 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

Back in the mid-70s Honda began importing into the US market their first car. 
Earlier they had just imported motocycles. A friend of mine had one and he 
loved it. Unfortunately, after a couple of years that model was discontinued 
and Honda only imported larger vehicles. I was told that the DOT regulations 
were changed to require cars to have a longer wheel base than that early Honda. 
At the time, I thought it was for safety reasons. Now, I wonder if there wasn't 
some other reason why those regulations were put into place. Anyway, when I 
lived in Europe in the 80s, I often saw neat small city cars, like the Fiat 500 
and the original Mini. Again, I was told they weren't exported to the US market 
because they were too small to meet regulations. So...my take on why the VW 
Lupo and the MB Smart Car aren't in the US market is based on these DOT 
regulations, not on some sort of problem with the engine. And, that is why they 
are considering an upsized model of the Smart Car in 2006 for the US market. If 
we want to see these small fuel efficient models in the US market, even just 
for city/town use, something needs to be done about the DOT regulations which 
require a minimum wheel base.

Derek


> I wonder, will Smart make the little SUV (Smart Urban Vehicle?) weigh in at
> 6,000 lbs to qualify for the tax write-off?  ;)
> 
> Ryan
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Neoteric Biofuels Inc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:38 AM
>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
>   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: smartcar
> 
> 
> 
>   RE: name...Maybe SUV "Sport Utlity Vehicle" is a name that needs
>   reclamation anyway...the ones out there now are neither sporty nor
>   utilitarian.
> 
>   Edward Beggs
> 
> 
>   On Thursday, May 6, 2004, at 07:51 PM, Brian wrote:
> 
>   > "Smart" does have plans to start marketing in the US in 2006.  They
>   > are designing an SUV for our market, and not planning to market the
>   > fortwo here.  Isn't Smart SUV an oxymoron?  I'm thinking that the
>   > name of the company says it all when it comes to why they're not
>   > selling in the US.  No market for such a product here.
>   >
>   > Brian
>   >
>   > --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >> On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:11:34 -0500, you wrote:
>   >>
>   >>> Murdoch,
>   >>>
>    Isn't this partly an issue of Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel not being
>    commonly available here, yet, the way it is in Europe?  If the
>   > fuel
>    appropriate to how they designed the engine were common,
>   > wouldn't they
>    be more inclined to sell the vehicle here?
>   >>>
>   >>> I'm not familiar with the fuel requirements of the Lupo.
>   >>>
>   >>> However, ULSD is only a few years away in the US, market wide.
>   >>>
>   >>> Todd Swearingen
>   >>
>   >> I think, by one measure, a few years is probably not that much
>   > time.
>   >> A refinery engineer, looking at the costs or difficulties, might
>   > have
>   >> a thing or two to tell us about this.
>   >>
>   >> But at the same time, I think this few years has been part of why
>   > we
>   >> haven't seen the advent of such cars as the LUPO or many other
>   >> affordable promising mileage-oriented excellent New-Diesel-
>   > Technology
>   >> vehicles in the U.S.
>   >>
>   >> It could even be used as a pretext to prevent (for awhile)
>   > admitting
>   >> the Smart Car.  Apparently, though, the diesel fuel in Canada won't
>   >> take the engine out of warranty, so I don't know about that.
>   >>
>   >> As I mentioned, with respect to the Smart Car, I think we should
>   >> anticipate that devilish pretexts will be used to delay or prevent
>   >> admission of something as promising looking as the Smart Car.  If
>   > I'm
>   >> wrong, then I will be the happiest about this.  I am just erring on
>   >> the side of assuming that "the opposition" (for want of a better
>   > way
>   >> to put a face to a name) will not discontinue operations because
>   > we've
>   >> finally found a promising alternative.


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[biofuel] NYT Article - US Farm Subsidies Impact Developing World

2004-04-28 Thread desertstallion

Those Illegal Farm Subsidies

Published: April 28, 2004

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/opinion/28WED1.html?th
 
America's lavish handouts to its farmers harvest poverty throughout the 
developing world. And they are illegal as well. That's the conclusion of a 
World Trade Organization panel that heard Brazil's challenge to the cotton 
subsidies that belie this nation's commitment to free and fair trade.

Cotton is far from the only crop that American farmers are able to dump on the 
international market at low prices thanks to federal subsidies. But it is one 
of the most outrageous cases. Brazil was wise in choosing it as the first 
target in the developing world's challenge of the roughly $1 billion a day in 
subsidies that rich nations dole out to their farmers. If the preliminary 
ruling stands, as expected, it may mean the beginning of the end for European 
and American practices that provide their farmers an unfair advantage.

In addition to Brazil, an agricultural superpower, some of the world's poorest 
nations, including the West African republics of Mali, Benin and Burkina Faso, 
are vindicated by the W.T.O.'s decision. Cotton is West Africa's cash crop, the 
one economic activity in which the region has a competitive advantage. By 
underwriting much of the costs of America's 25,000 cotton farmers with checks 
that can total $3 billion a year, Washington erases that advantage. Aided by 
American experts who are critics of this warped system, Brazil convincingly 
argued that in the absence of subsidies, the United States would have produced 
and exported substantially less cotton than it did in recent years. 
Consequently, growers elsewhere would have enjoyed greater market share and 
higher prices.

The glaring contradiction between American farm subsidies and the principles 
underlying the global trade system has long posed a moral and political problem 
for Washington. Now it is also a legal problem. Instead of digging in its heels 
and spending years appealing the panel's ruling, the Bush administration needs 
to seize upon it as a reason to negotiate the surrender of rich nations' 
trade-distorting farm subsidies.

The administration has a mixed record on this issue. It offered proposals to 
start weaning corporate farmers off their subsidies two years ago รท admittedly 
after approving a farm bill that exacerbated the problem. Then it backed away 
in the face of strong opposition from Congress and the European Union. That 
retreat not only hurt the poor nations' farmers, but also American taxpayers, 
consumers and most business interests, including more competitive farmers. 

The W.T.O.'s talks on the further liberalization of trade faltered over the 
subsidy issue at Cancยœn last year, but this week's ruling will vastly 
strengthen the position of Brazil and others advocating the dismantling of 
agricultural subsidies that distort trade. The sooner they prevail, the better. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Big and Bad: How The SUV ran over automotive safety

2004-04-27 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

Just to add to your paranoia, I just read an article about the recent terrorist 
attempt in Jordan that was foiled, and the intent was to use H2SO4 as either an 
explosive intensifier, or to produce a toxic cloud. I'm sure all suppliers and 
all purchasers will now be getting extra attention.

Derek





> I've had my TDI for two winters now, the first of which I didn't 
> have a garage.  Never a problem starting with straight dino diesel.  
> Indiana winters can get fairly chilly, with last winter being one of 
> the worst recently for cold temperatures.  
> 
> I'm hoping that by the time winter comes again I'll be running 
> straight biodiesel, if I can just get supply problems worked out.  I 
> still haven't been able to convince anyone to sell me H2SO4, and the 
> race fuel supplier who was supposed to deliver a drum of methanol 
> last week didn't show up and is not returning my phone calls.  I'm 
> almost starting to get a little paranoid about this.
> 
> Brian


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-27 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

How about EHN - Energia Hidroelectrica de Navarra

http://www.ehn.es/eng/index0.html

"A leading group in renewables"
-- Wind Power, Small Hydro, Biomass, Solar, and Bioclimatic Architecture

I have no idea how one would invest in the company, perhaps through the Spanish 
stock market.

Derek



> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:00:13 -0700, you wrote:
> 
> >Does anyone here have any ideas for investments in stocks (anywhere in
> >the world... does *not* have to be North America) that have a good
> >sustainable technology or energy technology or conservation angle?  
>


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Big and Bad: How The SUV ran over automotive safety

2004-04-27 Thread desertstallion

Hi Brian,

The TDIs in our experience are a pleasure to drive. We wanted the Golf as we 
felt it would be the most practical for a college bound youngster to carry 
stuff here and there. They didn't have one available and showed us the Jetta. 
We were impressed with the size of the truck, realized that it would do quite 
well, and we purchased. It has run extremely well...we have the manual 
transmission...including starting well through the winter. Also, from dad's 
perspective, I was pleased with the multiple safety features including 
something like nine airbags/curtains. I think if my daughter would have been 
left entirely on her own to choose between the three TDI models, she would have 
gone for the Beetle. I convinced her that she would need the cargo space of 
either the Golf or the Jetta. She has been very happy with the Jetta.

It is quite a change from the older 1980 Volvo Wagon with a VW manufactured 
Diesel that we drove to close to 200,000 miles before it died. It was sluggish, 
smoked tremendously, and was difficult to start in the winter, even with 
kerosene mixed in the fuel and with the block warmer plugged in. One was 
required to be a diesel lover to drive that car. To its credit, we got 28 mpg 
in constant city driving, and around 38 mpg on the highway, averaging generally 
around 34. This in a car that was built as heavy as a tank and when 
contemporary cars were often below 20 mpg. In contrast, this new TDI is a 
pleasure...I think...for anyone to drive. It doesn't even come with a block 
warmer! My daughter tells me she was able to start it all winter long without 
difficulty...better than many of her friends with gas burners.

Derek


> Derek,
> 
> Thanks for sharing your view.  I couldn't agree more with the 
> concept of having different vehicles for different purposes.  I 
> don't have need for a truck often enough to own one, but once or 
> twice a year have enough need to rent one.  That works for me.  I am 
> finding that my TDI Beetle doesn't have quite the cargo space I want 
> as I venture into the world of biodiesel, so plan to replace that in 
> the not too distant future with a TDI Jetta wagon.  The Beetle will 
> go to my daughter, whose needs it fits very well.
> 
> Brian
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Big and Bad: How The SUV ran over automotive safety

2004-04-27 Thread desertstallion

Lillie,

I think you are talking about commuter traffic. Most commuters have the good 
sense to leave the behemouth at home while they drive something more compact to 
work. Besides the fuel issues it is much easier to park a smaller car in the 
city. I know at times people critize families for having a large number of 
cars. I personally don't think it is necessarily bad. They have a larger 
vehicle available for family outings and for carting around the children while 
using the smaller vehicle for short runs to the store, or to commute to work. 
Back in 1987 I bought a large crew cab F-350 with dual wheels. I paid extra for 
the Diesel engine to improve its fuel mileage and later added a Gear Vendors 
over-drive transmission which improved its fuel mileage by 5 mpg. I drove it 
when I needed a truck, my parents who lived close by drove it when they needed 
a truck, and now that my children are reaching driving age they drive it when 
they need a truck. But, my parents primary vehicle is a car, my wife drove a 
Volvo Diesel wagon, and I had a relatively small Jeep wrangler for work 
purposes. I had a job that required me to be able to get to work regardless of 
weather...therefore the Jeep. We have since moved from the US, but my eldest 
daughter has a VW TDI Jetta, and the truck is still going strong driven by my 
parents and my kids, and I drive it when I visit. To me, this makes common 
sense, to use the vehicle best suited for the need at hand, and for something 
like a truck, that one probably doesn't need every day, to share it between 
families. In my case, it is shared across three generations!

Derek


> I do see many more very large Toyota (Land Cruiser & Sequoia) and the new
> Nissan's Armada; boy does that name spell out the problem! Commercial
> traffic of all types and sizes is huge but the largest number are the
> smaller sedans. Many of what's being called SUV are the mini-Ute's and
> repackaged mini-vans.
> 
> Lillie
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 11:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] Big and Bad: How The SUV ran over automotive safety
> 
> 
> > In addition to the other answers you've received, I will put in my two
> > cents, which is that, in this rural part of Southern Arizona, I have
> > looked around in a parking lot recently where it was hard to find too
> > many "cars".  This helps bring to our attention the connection between
> > the pickup trucks (of which one sees many) and the SUVs (of which one
> > sees many).  As to precisely which SUVs, that's hard to say, I don't
> > pay overly much attention, but I think part of your experience may be
> > based on what you've noticed and not what was there.  Maybe now that
> > we've had this conversation, you'll notice more?  Another possibility
> > I guess is a difference in vehicle-buying demographics between your
> > area and our(s).
> >
> > I wonder, for those families with several vehicles (such as affluent
> > parts of Baltimore or D.C.) if they put the larger SUVs away for a
> > little, during a rise in fuel prices?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:26:41 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> > >I drive between Baltimore, MD and Washington, D.C. on 95 in some of the
> US's
> > >heaviest traffic every day to work. I see an Expedition maybe once a week
> > >and a Navigator maybe once a month. So I must ask, where are them all?
> > >
> > >Lillie
> > >
> > >- Original Message - 
> > >From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: 
> > >Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 3:17 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [biofuel] Big and Bad: How The SUV ran over automotive
> safety
> > >
> > >
> > >> >http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_01_12_a_suv.html
> > >> >
> > >> >AP
> > >>
> > >> Hi Alan
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, I enjoyed that, learnt a lot - and about more than just SUVs.
> > >> Good read.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> Keith
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > >> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > >>
> > >> Biofuels list archives:
> > >> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
> > >>
> > >> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > >> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > >
> > >Biofuels list archives:
> > >http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
> > >
> > >Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > >To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >
> > Biofuels list archives:
> > http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
> >
> > Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMA

Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-26 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I guess a good excuse to take a trip to Australia!! One would think that if it 
were working well in Manzanares, they would have left it functioning.

Regards,

Derek



> 
> Derek,
> 
> I do not think that Spain can show anything today,
> 
> "Scientists have already built a successful prototype in Manzanares, Spain. 
> The plant operated from 1982 and 1989 and had a consistent output of 50 
> kilowatts of green energy. "
> 
> Do not operate after 1989 as far as I can understand.
> 
> Hakan
> 
> 
> 
> At 18:35 26/04/2004, you wrote:
> >Hi Art,
> >
> >Thank you for the link. Very interesting. I get to Spain from time-to-time 
> >and I'd like to try and see the prototype.
> >
> >Derek
> >
> >
> >Derek,
> >
> >Try this one for size:
> >
> >http://www.cbc.ca/storie
> s/2002/08/21/aus_power_020821
> >
> >Art



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Deserts - was Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology ...

2004-04-26 Thread desertstallion

Hakan,

My condolences. Although I hesitate to speak for the list in general, you and I 
have been here together for a number of years. You speak out much more 
frequently than I, but regardless, I think after a while of sharing experiences 
together, albeit through a list, one gets a feeling of family. As a fellow list 
brother, please accept my heart felt prayers for you and those close to you as 
you get back on your feet.

Derek


Derek,


I would have liked to expand this issue much more, but Teddy and I had a 
significant and great personal loss, http://energysavingnow.com/ and at the 
moment, I have difficulties in keeping my spirit for the energy 
issues up.

Hakan



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-26 Thread desertstallion

Hi Art,

Thank you for the link. Very interesting. I get to Spain from time-to-time and 
I'd like to try and see the prototype.

Derek


Derek,

Try this one for size:

http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2002/08/21/aus_power_020821

Art


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] OT: auto safety tips

2004-04-26 Thread desertstallion

Hi Greg,

That qualifier helps tremendously!

Derek



> At 7:08 AM 4/26/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Hi Greg,
> >
> >Please provide a source for your statement number 2. On the face of it, I
> >find it highly unlikely.
> >
> >Derek
> >
> Simple. Read any statistics on the number of abortions performed in the USA
> annually.
> 
> Greg
> 
> >> 1. Your handgun related death number is grossly inflated.
> >>
> >> 2. The number killed in car wrecks annually is, incredibly, only a small
> >> fraction of the number killed by medical doctors each year !!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] OT: auto safety tips

2004-04-26 Thread desertstallion

Hi Greg,

Please provide a source for your statement number 2. On the face of it, I find 
it highly unlikely.

Derek



> At 1:51 PM 4/25/04, Neoteric Biofuels Inc wrote:
> >Over 42,000 US citizens are killed per year, by each other, using cars.
> >
> >Close to 3,000,000 injured. (1)
> >
> >(What makes it so possible to drive so much, thus exposing oneself to
> >the risk? Cheap, heavily subsidized fuel. Public money spent on roads.
> >Externalized costs. What makes it so necessary? Development based on
> >automobile culture and the assumption that society will pay for a large
> >portion of the cost of the roads, and continue to subsidize cheap fuel.)
> >
> >(BTW, that is about triple the number of people killed via handguns in
> >the USA annually)
> 
> 1. Your handgun related death number is grossly inflated.
> 
> 2. The number killed in car wrecks annually is, incredibly, only a small
> fraction of the number killed by medical doctors each year !!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[biofuel] NYT Article - New Allies in the Energy Wars

2004-04-26 Thread desertstallion

New Allies in the Energy Wars

Published: April 26, 2004

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/26/opinion/26MON5.html?th
 
The spirit of bipartisanship on energy and environmental policy that has taken 
root among Eastern governors is showing signs of life in the West, 
traditionally an area of nonstop ideological warfare on these issues. Earlier 
this month, at an "energy summit" of governors and representatives from 18 
Western states, Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico, a Democrat, and Gov. Arnold 
Schwarzenegger of California, a Republican, co-signed a statement strongly 
endorsing energy efficiency and setting aggressive targets for much greater use 
of wind, solar, biomass and other forms of renewable energy throughout the 
region.

This was not politically risky for either man. Mr. Richardson, who served as 
President Bill Clinton's energy secretary, is known for his progressive views 
on these issues. Mr. Schwarzenegger's constituents include many lively and 
vocal environmentalists. Even so, their joint appeal for more enlightened 
strategies contrasts sharply with the gridlock over energy policy in Washington 
and with the Bush administration's faithful obeisance to the needs of producers 
of traditional fuels like oil, natural gas and coal. 

The statement is intended as the starting point for a more detailed regional 
strategy the two governors will offer at another meeting in June. It calls for 
the 18 Western states to develop at least 30,000 megawatts of electricity from 
renewable sources by 2015. That is about 15 percent of current demand in the 
region. The statement also calls for a 20 percent increase in electrical 
efficiency by 2020. Energy experts regard these targets as ambitious but 
achievable.

The statement is timely because energy policy at the national level is moving 
in exactly the opposite direction. Congress favors traditional fossil-fuel 
industries. The Interior Department, following the playbook drawn up by the 
Cheney energy task force three years ago, is aggressively seeking to drill for 
oil and gas on sensitive public lands. And, according to recent surveys, 
Western regulators are abandoning plans for cleaner but more costly gas-fired 
power plants and instead are considering proposals for 35 new coal-fired power 
plants, all of them based on decades-old technologies that do little to control 
carbon dioxide, the main global warming gas.

In recent years, innovative thinking on energy policy at the state level has 
been largely confined to the East, where officials like Gov. George Pataki of 
New York have developed plans for collective action to reduce air pollution and 
develop alternative energy sources. It is heartening to see Western governors 
rise to the challenge.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-24 Thread desertstallion

Hi Art,

I'm not sure of all of the intricacies of how the Saharan dust gets to the 
Amazon, but here is one of several sources supporting this found via a quick 
Google search.

http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/divs/mpo/Academics/Projects/Liu.doc

As you said, this is not at the crux of the discussion. It was just to give you 
an example of the fact that desert lands often have plenty of soil and are 
capable of growing food under the right conditions and it doesn't require 
'hydroponics.'

And, all of this is off the track of the original poster. His concept was of 
obtaining open desert land to be used for energy production, not to be used for 
food production. As I recall, you came back stating something to the effect 
that one couldn't live on a desert island because one couldn't produce food. As 
I understood his original post, and what I am supporting as possible, is the 
use of large tracks of open land for future production of energy, basically 
capturing the incident solar energy. And, I still can not see why one couldn't 
engineer a concept to do this.

I can still remember being in Maracaibo years ago getting a car repaired. The 
garage had a large open lot to work on vehicles. About 40 feet above the lot 
they had a corrugated metal roof. It was early afternoon, and that roof looked 
to me to be red hot from the sunlight incident upon it. However, it was high 
enough that none of the heat radiating from that roof bothered us at ground 
level. As the 'building' didn't have any walls, there was more than enough 
light from the sides to work, and it was clear that the working conditions in 
the open lot were enhanced by having that simple roof to block the sun.

So...although it wouldn't be economically feasible at this time...in future...I 
can visualize in places like Saudi large land areas where they have built solar 
collectors suspended well above the ground level. If they utilized roughly half 
of the incident light for electricity production, there would be plenty of 
remaining light below the structure to farm. The solar energy production could 
be supplemented by wind generators as they wouldn't block significant incident 
light from the solar collectors. The amount of light reaching ground level 
would be about what is needed to farm, and it wouldn't be nearly as hot at 
ground level either, and water needs would be consequently diminished. As I 
mentioned before, I currently see small scale structures in Saudi where they 
grow vegetables using translucent plastic roofs to allow only about half the 
incident light to reach the ground. It seems wasteful that the light blocked by 
the roof is not utilized...whereas if the roof were replaced by a solar 
collector it would be.

Anyway...I doubt that I would see something large scale like that in my 
lifetime...but I think it would work as well or better than a lot of other 
large scale solar collector sci-fi type concepts.

Regards,

Derek


> Bob,
> 
> The PREVAILING winds do move from west to east in both hemispheres due to the 
> rotation of the earth.  Hurricanes, which contain a large amount of energy, 
> can 
> move in a variety of directions - especially near the equator.
> 
> Note the following:
> 
> http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/weather/A0849225.html
> trade winds, movement of air toward the equator, from the NE in the Northern 
> Hemisphere and from the SE in the Southern Hemisphere. The trade winds 
> originate 
> on the equatorial sides of the horse latitudes, which are two belts of high 
> air 
> pressure, one lying between 25ยก and 30ยก north of the equator and the other 
> lying 
> between 25ยก and 30ยก south of it. The high air pressure in these belts forces 
> air 
> to move toward a belt of low air pressure along the equator called the 
> doldrums. 
> The air converging at the doldrums rises high over the earth, recirculates 
> poleward, and sinks back toward the earth's surface in the region of the 
> horse 
> latitudes, thus completing a cycle. The air does not move directly north or 
> south because it is deflected by the rotation of the earth. See wind; 
> Coriolis 
> effect.
> 
> It is not a serious point however.  The issue for me is trying to generate 
> food 
> in desert like conditions.  You can do it - you can also push water up hill 
> but 
> it all takes an inordinate amount of cheap energy to make it work.  The goal 
> is 
> to make the system sustainable which means, most likely, that you need to 
> work 
> with nature rather than against it.
> 
> Art
>   - Original Message - 
>   From: bob allen 
>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:51 AM
>   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable 
> Technology or Conservation Investments
> 
> 
>   actually Art, the  winds do blow from east to west across the Atlantic 
>   at least at the latitude which carries dust from the Sahara to the 
>   Caribbean and northeast South America.  Think Atlantic hurricanes which 

Re: [biofuel] Deserts - was Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology ...

2004-04-24 Thread desertstallion

Hi Hakan,

I hadn't read that one yet. Thank you.

I guess 'time will tell!' Certainly fossil fuels are a finite resource and we 
are going through them faster and faster. I guess, how soon they will be 
depleted depends a bit upon how optimistic one is and how far one wants to push 
the 'assumptions' in the studies.

As has been discussed here before...it really reminds one of a drug addiction. 
Use more and more until the ultimate crash. Whereas with bit of foresight and 
planning, the changeover to a more conservative, frugal lifestyle, and 
utilization of alternatives to fossil fuels could be managed for a soft detox.

Regards,

Derek


> 
> Derek,
> 
> I was just reading the ASPO news letter,
> 
> http://www.peakoil.net/Newsletter/NL40/newsletter40.pdf
> 
> Interesting and it is not as optimistic as you on production
> and reserves.
> 
> Hakan
> 
>


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Deserts - was Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology ...

2004-04-23 Thread desertstallion

Hi Hakan,

I tend to agree with you. And, it was certainly an eye opener when Shell 
admitted that it has been overstating its reserves for years. Yes, one must 
wonder how many of the other companies have been doing likewise. Still, I am 
not as sure as you that we are at the end...yet. For example, although I can't 
put my finger on the quote right now, the largest oil company in the world says 
something to the effect that it can continue to pump 10 million barrels per day 
for the next 92 years. I believe Iraq is number two in proven reserves. 
Eventually it will get back on line. If they can produce anywhere close to what 
Saudi can, then we have a bit of a respite. Then, there are the lesser players. 
The US continues to produce around eight million barrels per day. Isn't Russia 
the current number two producer? Regardless, I do think that production will 
have leveled off close to current levels, and as consumption increases...as it 
is forecast to do...things could get tight. The difference should be made up 
with conservation and alternatives. Eventually, I would surmise that oil 
production will fall off and the alternatives will progressively become a 
bigger part of the pie, assisted to no small degree by conservation. It would 
be nice to think this might happen in a somewhat controlled manner. I fear that 
it won't. Rather, consumption of crude will continue to grow instead of 
leveling and slowly falling, with the consequence that the world will 
progressively become more dependent upon crude, not less, until we arrive at a 
crunch.

Crunches tend not to be pretty.

Derek


> 
> Derek,
> 
> This has already ended and that is why you see the higher oil prices, 
> despite efforts to lower the price. The reason is that we probably do not 
> have the production margins needed to effect the price. Could also be a 
> reason why US are buying to the national storage, without even trying to 
> minimize the cost.
> 
> It is a general consensus now, that we are at the global peak of oil 
> production, give and take a few points, and if so, it is not space for the 
> growth you are talking about. If this is the case, the possibilities for 
> the traditional price manipulation have been greatly reduced. We do not 
> really know if the current cuts of oil production from OPEC is real 
> decisions or governed by production capacity. The cuts are against their 
> earlier policy of the price range below $29/barrel, with current prices 
> around $36/barrel. It might be a charade, to avoid to admit that they are 
> at the production peak, who knows.
> 
> In any case, I do not expect that you will see the global production grow 
> without any pauses. This because the faltering production from Iraq is 
> probably taking the resources from the swing producers already. It will 
> take too long for Iraq to resume oil production, to effect the oil price.
> 
> We do not have a clear picture and it is in the governments interest to 
> keep it that way, as long as possible.  The truth could 
> destabilize  economies, create violence and disturb current world order. 
> They start to discover that the oil companies have reported larger reserves 
> than they actually have and heads are rolling. 25% misrepresentation is a 
> lot for one of the largest companies. I would not be surprised, if we will 
> find that it is a general practice in the other oil giants too.
> 
> Hakan
> 
> 
> At 11:20 23/04/2004, you wrote:
> >
> >My personal ideals are much more in line with minimal disturbance of the 
> >natural environment. Minimal use of energy. I note though that despite all 
> >of the conservation efforts and alternative energy production the global 
> >use of petroleum is edging towards 80 million barrels a day. And, it seems 
> >to continue to grow in the West despite the fact that the economies have 
> >been in a stalemate. If the economy of North America and Europe were 
> >booming, one might anticipate that the energy use would be even higher. As 
> >the Asian economies continue to grow and their demand for petroleum 
> >continues to swell, added to the increased demand in the West as their 
> >economies finally get going, I can only anticipate that the global figure 
> >will pass the 80 million mark without much of a pause.
> >
> >Where, how and when is it going to end?
> >
> >Derek
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
---

Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-23 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I vaguely recall reading that a lot of the nutrients for the Amazon are carried 
by wind from the Sahara. Although a lot of the desert is 'just' sand, most of 
it has plenty of soil. If given a bit of water it blooms. It is amazing what 
all pops up once there is a bit of rain.

I think we basically agree on the best way to grow food, etc. But, I don't 
think Brian's suggestion of investing in desert land and adapting it to future 
energy production is without merit either. Certainly I don't think it should be 
discounted out of hand as a worthless idea.

Regards,

Derek


> Derek,
> 
> All the energy fuss doesn't cut ice.  If it isn't sustainable, what is it?  
> An 
> experiment?
> 
> How much of your wheat is grown using water produced by reverse osmosis?  
> Would 
> this be possible if the Saudi Arabian economy were not sustained by the sales 
> of 
> oil to the rest of the world?  Try the energy experience in the Sudan economy 
> perhaps or Yeman and see how far it goes.
> 
> The biggest places that are exporting food today have natural water and soil. 
>  
> These has been the traditional basis for food production since the beginning 
> of 
> time.  Not energy alone.  Energy helps but if you have nothing to eat, all 
> the 
> energy in the world doesn't do you a bit of good.
> 
> You don't farm in a desert because there is insufficient water or organic 
> matter 
> in the sand to make the system work.  Hydroponics does not compare with soil 
> produced food in quality or cost.  As an experiment, it might work fine but 
> to 
> produce food for 4 billion people it quickly fails.
> 
> The problem with viewing the problem from only an energy standpoint is the 
> saying, "to a man with a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail".  
> Sustainability should be the watchword.
> 
> Art
>   - Original Message - 
>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 8:23 AM
>   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable 
> Technology or Conservation Investments
> 
> 
>   Hi,
> 
>   Unlimited energy leads to all other needs. The most essential raw product 
> is 
> energy. Once one has energy they can recycle water, make water, grow food in 
> all 
> sorts of ways, etc. I've lived in the desert for ten years. It was an eye 
> opener 
> to realize how dependent life in the desert is on energy, and how everything 
> else pales. I live in Saudi...number one in the world at making potable water 
> from the sea. They grow enough wheat to meet their own needs, and export the 
> excess. Life is dependent on energy like nowhere else.
> 
>   Please don't misunderstand me. I am not advocating this. I don't consider 
> much 
> this to be sustainable. But, I don't think it is wise to minimize the 
> importance 
> of energy as the fundamental building block under everything else.
> 
>   In the desert, it would be easily possible to harvest 50% of the incident 
> light for electricity production and to farm with the remaining light. Brian 
> is 
> right on. The future energy production for the world could well come from 
> worthless deserts, with a top layer of Photovoltaics and vast farms under the 
> light collectors. The energy could possibly be exported by either microwaves 
> or 
> hydrogen pipelines.
> 
>   Regards,
> 
>   Derek
> 
> 
>   > Brian,
>   > 
>   > Before you invest in "worthless" desert islands, you better make sure you 
> can 
>   > raise food on that island.  Energy alone, whether hydrogen or 
> electricity, 
> makes 
>   > a poor meal even for an energy guru.
>   > 
>   > Art Krenzel, P.E.
>   > PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES
>   > 10505 NE 285TH Street
>   > Battle Ground, WA 98604
>   > 360-666-1883 voice
>   > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Deserts - was Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology ...

2004-04-23 Thread desertstallion

Hi Keith,

Thanks for all the information. It will give me a lot to read through. I 
appreciate your efforts to give me and the list the pointers.

I totally agree that deserts or not really deserted and certainly not 
worthless. The word choice was a carryover from the other previous poster's 
post. I am constantly amazed at the quantity and diversity of life that I find 
in the desert.

I also appreciate that the lifestyle of large cities built in the desert and 
dependent upon vast amounts of energy expenditure to keep them going is less 
than ideal. Our home here has two huge air conditioners which run constantly in 
the summer. The house is provided for us. It wouldn't be my option if I were to 
actually purchase and own. I've replaced all the bulbs with CFs at my own 
expense, and do what I can to minimize, but fear that these efforts are far 
less than adequate in the face of the air conditioning and refrigeration 
demands of leading a Western lifestyle in this environment. Certainly they 
could have done a lot better job of insulating, etc.

Also, as I stated in my second paragraph, I do not advocate what I see. For a 
long time electricity was almost given away here as a byproduct of water 
production from the desalination plants. They are cogeneration plants whose 
primary product is water. Electricity is the byproduct. The primary energy 
source is natural gas. Cheap electricity has led to a lot of abuses.

My goal in the post was to point out that the one previous posters idea of life 
on a desert island with only energy might not be as impossible as he indicated. 
It is common in Saudi to grow vegetables in long huts made out of translucent 
plastic. The light intensity is thusly cut down to about half. One end of the 
hut has a water drip panal for evaporative cooling. The other end of the hut 
has a fan to extract the air, which at the same time sucks cool air in through 
the drip panal. It appears to work fairly well, but there is the expense of 
constantly running the fans. They also have the world's largest dairy here 
although I am sure that it is more in lines with what you have discussed as 
industrialized farming.

Although it is far removed from your ideals of dispersed energy production, it 
is at least possible that large scale energy production could be made with PV 
panels spaced so as to utilize about half of the incident light. The other half 
could pass through and be used underneath for agriculture. Wind generators 
could be poked through the PV canapy and add to the energy production. I think 
it would be preferable to some of the Sci Fi plans for space based solar 
collectors microwaving energy to the surface.

My personal ideals are much more in line with minimal disturbance of the 
natural environment. Minimal use of energy. I note though that despite all of 
the conservation efforts and alternative energy production the global use of 
petroleum is edging towards 80 million barrels a day. And, it seems to continue 
to grow in the West despite the fact that the economies have been in a 
stalemate. If the economy of North America and Europe were booming, one might 
anticipate that the energy use would be even higher. As the Asian economies 
continue to grow and their demand for petroleum continues to swell, added to 
the increased demand in the West as their economies finally get going, I can 
only anticipate that the global figure will pass the 80 million mark without 
much of a pause.

Where, how and when is it going to end?

Derek


> Hi Derek and all
> 
> There are woodlands in the Wahiba Sands Desert of Oman, where 
> communities of Prosopis cineraria and Acacia tortilis trees survive 
> with little or no rainfall. This species of Prosopis yields useful 
> timber and excellent firewood, the leaves make nutritious fodder for 
> livestock, the pods are good fodder and also serve as a vegetable for 
> humans, the flowers support honey production, and the bark can be 
> used in leather tanning and yields an edible gum - all on less then 
> 75mm (2 inches) of rain and an eight-month dry season.
> 
> Prosopis cineraria also thrives in the Thar Desert in North West 
> India. In Rajasthan and Pakistan it has been the mainstay of the 
> local economies for thousands of years. This is one of the great 
> traditional agroforestry systems of the world. The people totally 
> rely on the Prosopis tree: they lop it for fodder, they eat the pods, 
> they interplant other crops with it. It tolerates incredibly dry 
> conditions. However, very little has been done to conserve it, and it 
> is threatened by over-population. There is tremendous scope to 
> conserve, investigate and improve the tree, and to extend its use. 
> Researchers have travelled throughout the range of Prosopis cineraria 
> in India, often travelling by camel or donkey. They collected 33 of 
> the most widely different types of the species.
> 
> These varieties have been shared with Oman, and the Omani varieties 
>

Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-22 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

Unlimited energy leads to all other needs. The most essential raw product is 
energy. Once one has energy they can recycle water, make water, grow food in 
all sorts of ways, etc. I've lived in the desert for ten years. It was an eye 
opener to realize how dependent life in the desert is on energy, and how 
everything else pales. I live in Saudi...number one in the world at making 
potable water from the sea. They grow enough wheat to meet their own needs, and 
export the excess. Life is dependent on energy like nowhere else.

Please don't misunderstand me. I am not advocating this. I don't consider much 
this to be sustainable. But, I don't think it is wise to minimize the 
importance of energy as the fundamental building block under everything else.

In the desert, it would be easily possible to harvest 50% of the incident light 
for electricity production and to farm with the remaining light. Brian is right 
on. The future energy production for the world could well come from worthless 
deserts, with a top layer of Photovoltaics and vast farms under the light 
collectors. The energy could possibly be exported by either microwaves or 
hydrogen pipelines.

Regards,

Derek


> Brian,
> 
> Before you invest in "worthless" desert islands, you better make sure you can 
> raise food on that island.  Energy alone, whether hydrogen or electricity, 
> makes 
> a poor meal even for an energy guru.
> 
> Art Krenzel, P.E.
> PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES
> 10505 NE 285TH Street
> Battle Ground, WA 98604
> 360-666-1883 voice
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   - Original Message - 
>   From: Brian 
>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 7:01 PM
>   Subject: [biofuel] Re: OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology 
> or 
> Conservation Investments
> 
> 
>   If I had real money to invest, I'd be buying up "worthless" desert 
>   land.  Between solar and wind technology, there is enough energy 
>   being wasted in the desert to do quite a bit of hydrogen conversion 
>   for fuel cell cars, if this technology ever goes anywhere.  At least 
>   that's my bright idea of the past year or so.
> 
>   Brian
> 
>   --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   > Does anyone here have any ideas for investments in stocks 
>   (anywhere in
>   > the world... does *not* have to be North America) that have a good
>   > sustainable technology or energy technology or conservation 
>   angle?  
>   > 
>   > I am working on a project to collect and refine some ideas in this
>   > area, and there are a couple of roadblocks I've run into.
>   > 
>   > For example, I was trying to think of a way, any way at all, to 
>   invest
>   > in the idea of energy conservation in the general realm of
>   > locally-grown locally-consumed low-input high-output foods.  But 
>   how
>   > to do this?  
>   > 
>   > I started tossing around the idea of Whole Foods (WFMI on yahoo 
>   U.S.
>   > stock boards) just because on balance one might end up shopping 
>   there
>   > for foods that have been grown according to 'some' conservationist
>   > principles, lower Petroleum input, etc.  If one buys eggs produced
>   > from range fed chickens, at least that's something.
>   > 
>   > But putting aside that dissatisfying compromise, if anyone has any
>   > ideas,  including 'outside the box' ideas of companies you've 
>   seen
>   > practicing or selling some offbeat sustainable idea or product, .. 
>   I'd
>   > be curious to hear it.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] OT: Worldwide Publicly Traded Sustainable Technology or Conservation Investments

2004-04-22 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I like CPST. They make microturbines for the local production of electricity 
from a variety of fuels including biofuels. Sustainable, local production of 
electricity close to the end user.

Regards,

Derek


> Does anyone here have any ideas for investments in stocks (anywhere in
> the world... does *not* have to be North America) that have a good
> sustainable technology or energy technology or conservation angle?  


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Gas Prices Reach Record Highs

2004-03-10 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

You might find that higher cost of fossil fuel will promote the development of 
oil fields in areas that are now considered too environmentally sensitive. I 
would prefer that the cost of fossil fuels stays below the threshold to develop 
these more expensive fields. But, I would like to see the expense of 
alternative fuels to continue to drop so that they make fossil fuels relatively 
more expensive than they currently are. I would also like to see more 
transparency in the subsidies of fossil fuels, so that some of the arguments 
that alternative fuels are more expensive would be counteracted.

Regards,

Derek
> Let the gas prices go through the roof. As much as it will hurt it will also
> kick in the needed development for alternates. The low cost of fuel is the
> thing causing our US stagnation in development.
> 
> Lillie
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] opinions on US energy situation? (was Alaska etc.)

2003-12-27 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

Although I agree that the US doesn't seem to be making much headway towards 
improvements in the energy situation, I think you are too pessimistic 
relative to the 'way out.'

I believe the means are available. It is just a matter of bringing attention 
to the problem. Of having the political will at the top, and of having 
awareness of the problem in the population. I really don't think the average 
person has gotten the message that there is a problem. Maybe they have been 
told too many lies through the ages and they say, 'but, the cost is the 
same.' They won't believe it until the cost of NG, or oil, or electricity, or 
whatever goes up. I sincerely don't believe the common man perceives a 
problem when he can get gasoline for a little more than a dollar a gallon. 
So...it is more comfortable and convenient to drive a large vehicle...and he 
does.

Jimmy Carter was able to turn the US around towards Solar and so forth during 
his administration when we had that fuel crisis. Then, the crisis went away, 
and so did the changes that had been implemented. If the awareness is there, 
we can have the put out the bonfire mentality and go for it, probably 
successfully, although it isn't the best way to correct a problem. When the 
US was focused on going to the moon by Kennedy, they got down to work and 
they did it. It is a matter of focus and political will.

I also feel that the answer to the energy 'problem' is right here on this 
biofuels list and the discussions of various biofuels. First, conservation. 
There is a tremendous amount of energy savings available through conservation 
with relatively little impact on US quality of life. Some are already in use 
in the country and just need to be expanded. Others are already in use in 
other countries and just need to be borrowed. Flourescent lighting, compact 
flourescents as retrofits, LED lighting, better insulation of buildings, co-
gen projects, etc. On the energy supply side, we can substitute biodiesel, 
SVO/WVO into diesel engines, both stationary and in transport applications. 
Ethanol can be used in spark ignition engines. Space heating is a huge energy 
user and I see corn burning and other biomass burning as a big solution to 
this problem. See http://burncorn.net/ I really don't see any need for space 
heating to come from any other source than the burning of waste biomass or 
renewables such as corn. Wind and solar can be expanded.

The means are available. The will is not.

I think the people are getting the message, albeit slowly. I think that there 
will be change to a more sustainable future regardless of what the political 
industrial complex want. The word of a better way is getting out...through 
the Internet, etc. There is a basic ground swell of change in progress that 
eventually the politicians will need to answer to.

One thing I see as essential will be a lowering of the cost of alternative 
energies. I know it is often discussed that it would be advantageous to raise 
the cost of fossil energy to the level of alternatives to make the 
alternatives more attractive. My fear along these lines is that as the price 
of crude goes up, fields that currently are not economically viable, or are 
too environmentally sensitive, will become economically and politically 
viable. We might see a lot more environmental destruction as areas are 
exploited that currently wouldn't be acceptable. So...I would like to see the 
price of energy go up to encourage savings as mentioned in the first 
paragraph, but am concerned that if this is too great, we could see 
accelerated and more wanton destruction of the environment in the pursuit of 
fossil fuels. Hopefully the cost of alternatives will cap the cost in such a 
way that they cost of fossil fuels will not go to a level that these hard to 
exploit fields will be opened.

Derek

> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
> US have both capacity and shown in the past that things can happen quickly, 
> but this time it will be very difficult. It would need a regime change and 
> not only that, the new regime would need to understand what has to be done. 
> It is too serious to be subject to the normal lobbying, corporate and 
> political interests. I am not that optimistic about US, at least not 
> without very serious harm have been done to US and the world. This is maybe 
> the most serious draw back of democracies. It is difficult to get painful 
> cures in place and people are often told that the problems are less than 
> they are.
> 
> I think that you are right, it need fundamental changes and the signs are 
> not good. It is many things that can be done better, but the search for a 
> golden bullet is very damaging. US starts to be a victim of its own 
> propaganda. I said once on the list that US was a technology leader, 
> without thinking too much, I am also in some instances falling for it. The 

> list immediately and rightfully corrected me, US is not a leader in 
> innovations and has never been. The da

Re: [biofuel] What's the true story on ethanol?

2003-12-17 Thread desertstallion

Alex,

Although, in general, I prefer Diesel engines and either biodiesel or SVO/WVO 
over ethanol and spark ignition engines, one must admit that in the case of 
Brazil the best solution over all has probably been ethanol given the huge 
amounts of sugarcane they had available to them. In your case, Canada, you 
have lots and lots of Canola, and would prefer that. It all has to be looked 
at relative to the local environment.

Cheers,

Derek
> To me the question is -  was ethanol the best way for Brazil  to solve 
> the fuel problem?
> The same question can be applied to many discussions on this list.
> Yes, there are many ways of making the fuel - but why to choose curved 
> line over the straight line?
> I think we always have to try to approach straight line as much as 
> possible in our decision making.
> Right now I'm convinced that straight line is a diesel on SWO approach.
> It took me some time to figure it out - at first I was a proponent of 
> ethanol, then steam, then Bio-diesel, and only now I realized
> that SWO + diesel is an ideal combination. What is most appealing to me 
> is the fact that  SWO can be bought anywhere,
> from a local farmer shed to a corner variety store. Also it can be grown 
> locally and easy to process - basically Canola
> just needs to be crashed and filtered. Efficiency in a diesel is quite 
> high ~ 40 %, plus it can be used in a burner for heat!
> Getting back to Brazil - just want to make the record straight. For some 

> reason in these discussions it is perceived that Brazil
> is next thing to the Garden of Eden because it is making lots of 
> Ethanol. Yet it could be doing 10 times better if it produced
> SWO instead for driving and used diesel as a main engine. In general 
> Brazil has a tremendous level of poverty among its
> population. It also systematically destroys Amazon forest.
> Sorry - Brazil is not ny model of paradise.
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Keith Addison wrote:
> 
> >>Some comments:
> >>
> >>Keith Addison wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> It seems to me that SVO is a better solution then ethanol.
> Why?- Because it is easy to make and easy to get, license free.
> One really doesn't have to make  a"plant" for it - it is very safe too!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >>>Alex, we need MORE biofuels options, not less. Anyway in practise it
> >>>doesn't make good sense to say one proven technology is necessarily
> >>>better than another, it depends on the particular circumstances. The

> >>>"best technology" approach usually ends up with the problem being
> >>>fitted to the solution, whether it fits well or not, instead of the
> >>>other way round. Then come all the so-called "unexpected
> >>>side-effects", and the net result is too often just the opposite of
> >>>what was intended.
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>>I agree - I'm just talking as an Ontario resident, here we really 
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>can use more sun, but we got
> >>
> >>
> >> lots of productive land and decent hard - working people.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>  
> >>>
> Lets suppose for a minute that diesel engine could run on SVO without
> any mods.
> Will we need diesel fuel or biodiesel ? - No.
> Why not to put pressure on manufacturers in this case to make diesel
> engines which can run on SVO without any mods?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >>>This is what it says at the "TDI-SVO controversy" page at Journey to
> >>>Forever, and I've often said so here, and so have others:
> >>>

> >>>"... But in establishing what works and what doesn't work, some are
> >>>likely to be left with the remains of what didn't work. They'll be
> >>>heroes in the cause of real straight vegetable oil diesel motors,
> >>>that anyone can use, not just enthusiasts -- manufacturer-made,
> >>>supplied and warranted diesels that can run on petro-diesel,
> >>>biodiesel or straight vegetable oil, in any blend, without any
> >>>fuel-switching or fuss: fill 'er up, switch on and go, stop and
> >>>switch off, like any other car. Currently only the Elsbett system
> >>>does that."
> >>>http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_TDI.html
> >>>
> >>>It's one reason we promote SVO use. The more people use SVO, no
> >>>matter what system or method they use, the more it's likely to dawn
> >>>on the manufacturers that there's a demand for SVO diesels. Biodiesel
> >>>would then have been a transitional fuel, though it will continue to
> >>>be used for decades in the very many long-lasting diesels around the

> >>>world made before any shift by manufacturers to full SVO capability.
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>This is a very reasonable approach.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> Brazil, with its warm climate , should  switch to SVO or  Turpentine!
> instead.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >>>Not so, they've established a sound, effective and sustainable system
> >>>of producing large amounts of fuel ethanol, you'd want them to
> >>>abandon it for no very clear 

Re: [biofuel] Bridging UPSs or inverters

2003-11-14 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I believe you need some sort of master controller to keep them in sync - 
otherwise, I believe, they will drift out of sync over time.

Derek
> This may be a bit off topic, but I have an inverter question:
> 
> I have a couple of APC SmartUps's (computer uninterruptible power 
> supply). I was wondering if the output of these can be linked in 
> parallel (assuming correct polarity and initially sync'ed to grid 
> frequency) to add additional capacity. The reason for this is that 
> they can be had relatively cheap compared to a Trace inverter.
> 
> My hope is to place them between my bio-diesel co-generator (heats 
> the house too) to 1) condition the power and 2) run the house on 
> batteries during low current demand periods.
> 
> I know Trace and some other solar inverters can by bridged together, 
> but how about a UPS? Anyone know if it can be done?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuels-biz] Biodiesel Test - Municipal Fleet - Spain - EHN

2003-11-04 Thread desertstallion

I donรขt believe anyone has posted this item concerning a study of biodiesel 
in municipal garbage collection trucks and buses.

Derek

http://www.ehn.es/eng/textos/noticia20030912.html
 
 Press releases  
 
EHN and the Mancomunidad de Pamplona will 
incorporate biodiesel into public transport services 

--
--


A bus and a garbage collection truck will use this biofuel and the results 
will be compared against two similar vehicles of the Mancomunidad (Area 
Services Board) that use diesel. 

EHN will analyse the influence of biodiesel on the performance of the engines 
and polluting emissions 

The aim is to extend the use of biofuel to the entityรขs entire fleet (165 
vehicles) 
12 September 2003 

Corporaciย—n Energย’a HidroelยŽctrica de Navarra, S.A. (EHN) and the 
Mancomunidad de la Comarca of Pamplona have today signed a collaboration 
agreement to set up the experimental use of biodiesel (a clean fuel to 
replace ordinary diesel) in public service buses and garbage collection 
trucks, with a view to its future use in the Area Services Board's entire 
fleet (165 vehicles). EHN will produce the biodiesel and will carry out a 
pioneer study in the area in Spain. The Mancomunidad will provide four 
vehicles: two of them รถa bus and a garbage truck- use this biofuel and 
another two รถidentical vehicles- conventional diesel, the idea being to 
analyse the influence of bioidiesel on the performance of the engines and on 
polluting emissions. 

The agreement was signed this morning by Fermย’n Gembero, General Manager of 
EHN, and Javier Iturbe, Presidente of the Mancomunidad de la Comarca de 
Pamplona. Trials will begin in October and will continue for one year 

By virtue of the agreement, the renewables company EHN will provide the Area 
Services Board with the biodiesel necessary for its use รถ8,000 litres per 
month, with the quality required by European Standard EN 14214-, that will be 
produced in the experimental laboratory in SangยŸesa, next to the biomass 
plant of EHN. 

The use of biodiesel will not represent any extra cost to the Mancomunidad in 
relation to conventional diesel fuel. 

EHN has also provided the tanks and pumps required to supply the vehciles in 
the installations that the Mancomunidad has in the Cuidad del Transporte 
(trucks) and Ezcaba (buses). 

100% biodiesel and a mixture 

The vehicles provided by the Area Services Board will be two buses on the 
Rochapea-Old Part route and two garbage collection trucks based in the suburb 
of Mendebaldea and in the town of Baraย–ย‡in. One of the buses will use 100% 
biodiยŽsel without mixing it with diesel, and one of the trucks will us a 30% 
mixture. The other two vehicles will only use diesel fuel and will be used 
for comparative purposes under similar operating conditions. 

Public transport users will not notice any changes in the services provided. 

Clean fuel 

Biodiesel is a clean fuel, an alternative to diesel produced from local and 
renewable resources, with major environmental and socio-economic advantages 
over fossil fuels. 

Obtained from vegetable oilss รถ mainly from sunflower, rapeseed or soya, or 
animal fats รถ biodiesel considerably reduces contaminating gas emissions 
produced by diesel fuel. It is renewable because its origins are 
agricultural, it reduces energy dependence on oil in the sector (currently 
above 98%) and is means of creating employment in rural areas in the future. 

The study promoted by EHN and the Area Services Board is one of the first 

The influence of biodiesel on engine performance is also studied. This fuel 
can be used by current diesel engines รถpure or mixed in any proportion- 
without any modification, and prolongs their working life thanks to the 
higher power produced. 

In line with Europe 

With around 40% of the total, transport is the biggest emitter of greenhouse 
gases to the atmosphere รถmainly CO2-, that cause global warming and climate 
change. 

The use of biofuels รถ biodiesel and bioethanol- is one of the main measures 
promoted on an international level to reduce atmospheric contamination from 
road transport, with the aim of increasing its environmental sustainability. 

The European Union, en its Directive of 8 May on the promotion of the use of 
biofuel, sets the objective that this should represent 2% of the total 
consumption in the sector by 2005 (the figure is currently below 0.5%) and 
75% en 2010. 

EHN, one of the main developers of wind power in the world and a player in 
the fields of biomass, hydroelectric power and solar energy, has incorporated 
biofuel into its range of activities. 

In addition to the experimental laboratory in SangยŸesa, with an annual 
production capacity of 300 tonnes, the company is building a plant in 
Caparroso to produce 35,000 tonnes of biodiesel fuel per year and it will be 
operational in 2004. The investment is over 16 million euros. 
 
 
 


 

[biofuel] Biodiesel Test - Municipal Fleet - Spain - EHN

2003-11-04 Thread desertstallion

I donรขt believe anyone has posted this item concerning a study of biodiesel 
in municipal garbage collection trucks and buses.

Derek

http://www.ehn.es/eng/textos/noticia20030912.html
 
 Press releases  
 
EHN and the Mancomunidad de Pamplona will 
incorporate biodiesel into public transport services 

--
--


A bus and a garbage collection truck will use this biofuel and the results 
will be compared against two similar vehicles of the Mancomunidad (Area 
Services Board) that use diesel. 

EHN will analyse the influence of biodiesel on the performance of the engines 
and polluting emissions 

The aim is to extend the use of biofuel to the entityรขs entire fleet (165 
vehicles) 
12 September 2003 

Corporaciย—n Energย’a HidroelยŽctrica de Navarra, S.A. (EHN) and the 
Mancomunidad de la Comarca of Pamplona have today signed a collaboration 
agreement to set up the experimental use of biodiesel (a clean fuel to 
replace ordinary diesel) in public service buses and garbage collection 
trucks, with a view to its future use in the Area Services Board's entire 
fleet (165 vehicles). EHN will produce the biodiesel and will carry out a 
pioneer study in the area in Spain. The Mancomunidad will provide four 
vehicles: two of them รถa bus and a garbage truck- use this biofuel and 
another two รถidentical vehicles- conventional diesel, the idea being to 
analyse the influence of bioidiesel on the performance of the engines and on 
polluting emissions. 

The agreement was signed this morning by Fermย’n Gembero, General Manager of 
EHN, and Javier Iturbe, Presidente of the Mancomunidad de la Comarca de 
Pamplona. Trials will begin in October and will continue for one year 

By virtue of the agreement, the renewables company EHN will provide the Area 
Services Board with the biodiesel necessary for its use รถ8,000 litres per 
month, with the quality required by European Standard EN 14214-, that will be 
produced in the experimental laboratory in SangยŸesa, next to the biomass 
plant of EHN. 

The use of biodiesel will not represent any extra cost to the Mancomunidad in 
relation to conventional diesel fuel. 

EHN has also provided the tanks and pumps required to supply the vehciles in 
the installations that the Mancomunidad has in the Cuidad del Transporte 
(trucks) and Ezcaba (buses). 

100% biodiesel and a mixture 

The vehicles provided by the Area Services Board will be two buses on the 
Rochapea-Old Part route and two garbage collection trucks based in the suburb 
of Mendebaldea and in the town of Baraย–ย‡in. One of the buses will use 100% 
biodiยŽsel without mixing it with diesel, and one of the trucks will us a 30% 
mixture. The other two vehicles will only use diesel fuel and will be used 
for comparative purposes under similar operating conditions. 

Public transport users will not notice any changes in the services provided. 

Clean fuel 

Biodiesel is a clean fuel, an alternative to diesel produced from local and 
renewable resources, with major environmental and socio-economic advantages 
over fossil fuels. 

Obtained from vegetable oilss รถ mainly from sunflower, rapeseed or soya, or 
animal fats รถ biodiesel considerably reduces contaminating gas emissions 
produced by diesel fuel. It is renewable because its origins are 
agricultural, it reduces energy dependence on oil in the sector (currently 
above 98%) and is means of creating employment in rural areas in the future. 

The study promoted by EHN and the Area Services Board is one of the first 

The influence of biodiesel on engine performance is also studied. This fuel 
can be used by current diesel engines รถpure or mixed in any proportion- 
without any modification, and prolongs their working life thanks to the 
higher power produced. 

In line with Europe 

With around 40% of the total, transport is the biggest emitter of greenhouse 
gases to the atmosphere รถmainly CO2-, that cause global warming and climate 
change. 

The use of biofuels รถ biodiesel and bioethanol- is one of the main measures 
promoted on an international level to reduce atmospheric contamination from 
road transport, with the aim of increasing its environmental sustainability. 

The European Union, en its Directive of 8 May on the promotion of the use of 
biofuel, sets the objective that this should represent 2% of the total 
consumption in the sector by 2005 (the figure is currently below 0.5%) and 
75% en 2010. 

EHN, one of the main developers of wind power in the world and a player in 
the fields of biomass, hydroelectric power and solar energy, has incorporated 
biofuel into its range of activities. 

In addition to the experimental laboratory in SangยŸesa, with an annual 
production capacity of 300 tonnes, the company is building a plant in 
Caparroso to produce 35,000 tonnes of biodiesel fuel per year and it will be 
operational in 2004. The investment is over 16 million euros. 
 
 
 

 Y

Re: [biofuel] Coolant Heating

2003-11-01 Thread desertstallion

Hi Aidan,

Maybe on some others vehicles the coolant would be cut off when the heater is 
turned off? If you've checked it out, and you don't have the coolant cut off, 
then I would say, go with the easiest connection - but, I haven't done it - 
so, as I said, I'm no expert to go by.

Derek

> Derek,
> 
> That is definitely a very valid concern, but according to the VW repair 
> manual even when you shut off the head the coolant still flows through the 
> heater core.  Hooking it up in series would have no effect on the flow or 
> heater 
> core (other than a little less heat).
> 
> Aidan 
> 
>   - Original Message - 
>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 11:16 PM
>   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Coolant Heating
> 
> 
>   Hi,
> 
>   I'm no expert, but it sounds like your talking of connecting in 
> series...so, 
>   what happens if you turn off the heat. Doesn't the flow get cut off, too? 
>   Whereas if they are connected in parallel, as it sounds like you say they 
>   recommend, the flow to the tank would be independent of the flow through 
> the 
>   car's heater core.
> 
>   Derek
> 
>   > Hello,
>   > 
>   > I have a quick question for all the experts in the group.  I am in 
> the 
>   > design phase of my SVO conversion for a 90 Jetta diesel.  I intend to use 
> a 
>   > coolant/electric hybrid heating system.  The only thing I have not worked 
> out is 
>   > why all the systems I have seen use a "T" connection to the interior 
> heater 
>   > lines.  Wouldn't more heat be used to heat the WVO if the coolant was 
> sent 
>   > straight from the engine to the tank and back.  Then through the interior 
> heater 
>   > core before returning to the engine? or is there a reason all the 
> system's I 
>   > have seen use a "T" connection for the coolant lines running to the WVO 
> tank?
>   > 
>   > I look forward to your replies.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > Aidan Wilkins
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>   > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>   > 
>   > Biofuels list archives:
>   > http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
>   > 
>   > Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
>   > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>   > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   > 
>   > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>   > 
>   > 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
>   ADVERTISEMENT
>  
>
>
> 
>   Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
>   http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
>   Biofuels list archives:
>   http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
> 
>   Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
>   To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Grass biomass as fuel

2003-11-01 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

If you're interested in biomass, and can read Spanish, try a Google 
on 'biomasa' and 'Sanguesa'. They have just brought on line a biomass plant 
that burns straw/hay to produce electricity. It sounds very promising. That 
area of Spain in the foothills of the Pyrenees has a lot of pasture land 
where they graze a lot of sheep/horses/cattle, and they also produce a lot of 
hay. I think the land slopes too much for growing much else. And they produce 
a lot more hay than they can use to carry the animals through the winter. Now 
the farmers have an additional saleable product, it can be burned CO2 
neutral, is renewable, has a short growth cycle, and supports the local 
economy. It sounds like a winner. Maybe something similar to this could be 
used in the praries with their vast grasslands?

It seems to me that burning biomass as a biofuel should be more efficient as 
it doesn't have to be fermented, or pressed, or anything much. Of course, 
liquid fuels have their place as a transport fuel, but for stationary power, 
I would guess that biomass would have the advantage of less need for 
manipulation.

Derek

> http://www.covantaenergy.com/energy/biomass.php4
> 
> As I said a few months ago, I ran across this wood-biomass-to-electricity 
> plant
> north of Sacramento this summer and was told by one local how clean it was, 
> and
> how it allowed homeowners to have an option for clearing their land of some 
> wood
> not-suitable-for-firewood-or-building.  Later I learned that this was a few
> years old, but still, it seems relatively obscure.
> 
> As Southern California and Denver and others now belatedly search for a better
> forest and fire policy, what I'd love to see is not so much any one measure 
> as a
> "cure-all" but use of measures such as this in limited moderate ways, to help
> communities not only do a better job with fire prevention and mitigation, but
> also to generate power and make money.
> 
> other links of interest that came up:
> 
> http://www.calbiomass.org/county.htm
> 
> (San Diego, San Bernadino, Orange, Los Angeles Counties not listed!  Riverside
> has only one entry.  These are the five disaster-area counties of the recent
> fires.  If I'm not mistaken, San Bernadino is the single biggest county in the
> US or the lower 48.  Much of it is desert, though certainly not all of it.)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Coolant Heating

2003-11-01 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I'm no expert, but it sounds like your talking of connecting in series...so, 
what happens if you turn off the heat. Doesn't the flow get cut off, too? 
Whereas if they are connected in parallel, as it sounds like you say they 
recommend, the flow to the tank would be independent of the flow through the 
car's heater core.

Derek

> Hello,
> 
> I have a quick question for all the experts in the group.  I am in the 
> design phase of my SVO conversion for a 90 Jetta diesel.  I intend to use a 
> coolant/electric hybrid heating system.  The only thing I have not worked out 
> is 
> why all the systems I have seen use a "T" connection to the interior heater 
> lines.  Wouldn't more heat be used to heat the WVO if the coolant was sent 
> straight from the engine to the tank and back.  Then through the interior 
> heater 
> core before returning to the engine? or is there a reason all the system's I 
> have seen use a "T" connection for the coolant lines running to the WVO tank?
> 
> I look forward to your replies.
> 
> 
> Aidan Wilkins
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/xlw.sC/XP.FAA/3jkFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Microturbines vs fuel cells

2003-11-01 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I like cogen. It is like getting something for nothing. In the old days one 
would burn diesel and generate electricity. Next to it, one would burn diesel 
and fire a boiler for hot water. Somebody finally said, hey why not use the 
hot exhaust from the generator, and the heat in the coolant and heat the 
water in the boiler. Two products from one! I love it.

Here in Saudi Arabia there is a big need for water. They are therefore the 
world's largest producers of potable water from sea water. I don't know all 
of the details, but basically they burn natural gas to produce heat to get 
the potable water through an evaporative process. But, rather than do it 
directly, they do it with cogen. So, they produce electricity from natural 
gas and then use the waste heat from electrical production to produce potable 
water. At one time they were practically giving away the electricity since 
the primary product was water. Free electricity. Cogen.

I suspect that there are other processes out there that haven't been fully 
exploited to similarly get something for nothing. I bet there are processes 
to get more than two uses from the same energy burn, maybe three, or four. We 
need to look about and THINK.

Derek
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:12:49 -0500, you wrote:
> 
> >Their website lists 70-90% for cogeneration. I would imagine much less if 
> you're wasting the exhaust heat.
> >
> >-- 
> 
> Thx.  This whole cogeneration thing confuses me.  I mean, we're told that ICE
> engines invariably lose x amount to pumping losses and what-not, but if those
> "losses" are partly used in a productive way by cogeneration, ... i.e. if
> cogeneration can be applied to all of these technologies (ICE, micro-turbine,
> fuel cell) and if they're all about the same efficiency once cogeneration is
> taken into account, then aren't the advantages of switching to other
> technologies reduced?  Just a thought I've been having for awhile.  If
> cogeneration is in part the fine are of making "waste" heat useable, then I'd
> think that could be nicely applied to technologies such as ICE engines with
> plenty of "waste" heat.
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Natural-Gas-To-Liquids using Fischer-Tropsch?

2003-11-01 Thread desertstallion

Hi Martin,

I was hoping someone with a little bit more knowledge might jump in here, but 
let me make a couple of comments.

I think stranded refers to gas deposits which do not have ready pipeline 
access. So any gas produced could not be shipped economically. Options would 
then either involve producing LNG, or perhaps this 'new' process.

I also understand that gas deposits can be described as either associated or 
non-associated with crude petroleum deposits. But, I don't think they mean 
non-associated by 'stranded' in this case.

Recently I came to realize that there is a distinction in OPEC quotas between 
production and export. For some reason, I always thought that when quotas 
were discussed that they referred to export. Actually, I have been told that 
they are production quotas. Why is this important? Because all of the oil 
produced and used domestically is counted in the quota. So...if the producing 
country can switch domestic use to natural gas, which isn't in the quota, and 
which used to often be wasted, they have a lot more oil for export while 
maintaining the same quota. There is a huge push in Saudi Arabia for all 
domestic energy use for electrical and water production to be based on 
natural gas. It is also preferred as the feedstock for the local Saudi 
chemical industry. Perhaps in part since it is exempt from quotas.

The gas produced at the well head is processed a lot. Sulfur is removed. And, 
they also talk a lot about condensate. This condensate measures in hundreds 
of thousands of barrels. I just wonder how different this process is from the 
one discussed below. Regardless, I have a suspicion, that since the feedstock 
to produce the condensate is natural gas, that this is exempt from the OPEC 
quota. The condensate is a high quality product such as naptha. This means 
that an additional reason why they might look into synthetic production of 
liquid fuels from gas would be to bypass the OPEC quotas.

Derek

> What exactly constitutes a 'stranded' natural gas resource, and why would it 
> be 
> cheaper to build a plant to produce liquid fuel at such a place? (that's what 
> they cite as one reason for doing it)
> I don't know how much gas it takes to create the liquid fuel, but I don't 
> know 
> why it would be better to do so. I haven't heard that gas prices are going 
> down 
> any time soon have you?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Martin Klingensmith
> http://infoarchive.net/
> http://nnytech.net/
> 
> 
> 
> murdoch wrote:
> 
> >http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031003/daf004a_1.html
> >
> >Anyone who knows about these chemical processes have any opinions (good, bad,
> >indifferent) in reading this?  I think Syntroleum started out as sort of a
> >Texaco thing but I don't recall.  I do know that Texaco was looking to 
> >increase
> >the value of their Natural Gas Assets.  Parts of this article will really 
> bother
> >those here, in that it ignores the many benefits of the renewable biofuels 
> >that
> >we discuss.  But I'm also just sort of curious and interested in the claimed
> >values of the fuels this plant will produce.
> >
> >Years ago I included them in our "Fuel Cell Index" because it seemed clear 
> >that
> >they were trying to produce fuels that might be used in a fuel cell.  For
> >example, they speak of their fuels being relatively hydrogen-rich.  That 
> >still
> >seems to be true, though I gnash my teeth to continue including them, since
> >they're so totally pro-oil/obfuscate-renewables.  I'd *love* to include a
> >biofuel company that had a realistic tie-in to fuel cells.
> >
> >
> >Press Release Source: Syntroleum Corporation 
> >
> >
> >Syntroleum Dedicates Ultra-Clean Fuels Plant With Marathon and U.S. DOE
> >Friday October 3, 11:00 am ET  
> >Completes Construction on Plant to Produce Synthetic Diesel From Natural Gas
> >Feedstock for Government Vehicle Fleet Demonstrations 
> >
> >
> >TULSA, Okla., Oct. 3 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Syntroleum Corporation 
> >(Nasdaq:
> >SYNM - News), Marathon Oil Company and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
> >announced today the dedication of the newly constructed gas-to-liquids (GTL)
> >demonstration plant at the Port of Catoosa, near Tulsa, Oklahoma. When the 
> plant
> >goes on stream in early November it will employ the proprietary Syntroleumยจ
> >Process to produce about 70 barrels per day of ultra-clean synthetic
> >transportation fuels. The fuel will be used in long-term testing and
> >demonstration in vehicle fleets, such as Washington, DC metropolitan buses 
> >and
> >National Park Service vehicles.
> > 
> >The plant was designed and constructed under the DOE's Ultra-Clean Fuels
> >program, a federal program managed by the DOE's National Energy Technology
> >Laboratory to pioneer a new generation of ultra-clean transportation fuels to
> >significantly reduce tailpipe emissions from cars, trucks and other heavy
> >vehicles. The plant's construction and operating costs approximate $52 
> >million
> >-- of w

Re: [biofuel] Microturbines vs fuel cells

2003-10-30 Thread desertstallion

Dan,

I have a vague idea that I read somewhere that they are around USD 20,000 to 
30,000. Way too much for a home application. Hopefully if they are downsized, 
the price would also be deflated. But, for a commercial application such as a 
cogen in a hotel, apparently the price is competitive.

Regards,

Derek

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > 
> > I think they need to try and downsize the turbines to the output for a 
> > house 
> > sized unit. Then, put one in the house and turn it on, fueled with 
> > biodiesel. 
> > Turn off the power company. It can set up as a cogen, so one has space 
> > heat, 
> > hot water, and electricity, all at the same time.
> 
> They look nice, but I've been unable to find pricing information.  Have
> any of you seen prices for them?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> -- 
> Jack of all trades, master of none.
> Fiber Artist - Genealogist - Kilt Maker - Linux Geek - Piper - Woodworker
> http://www.xmission.com/~redbeard

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Microturbines vs fuel cells

2003-10-30 Thread desertstallion

MM,

I think they are only used in buses or trucks for HEV applications due to 
their output. These are either 30 or 60 kW turbines. They can be grouped in 
sets of up to 100 units working together for non-HEV applications. That was 
why I made the comment about downsizing. Currently, they are too large for 
what I would want for a single home or a small vehicle. But, the technology 
looks 'perfect,' if they could be downsized.

Poke around the site at www.microturbine.com They have some white papers that 
deal with emissions, etc. They might have what you are looking for concerning 
efficiency, which I think is a good point relative to the fuel cells, and one 
I hadn't thought of. If I am reading the chart properly, electrical 
efficiency is between 25% and 30% for the 30kW turbine, depending on fuel. 
Efficiency would go up if the exhaust heat is used in a cogen for stationary 
applications, but I don't see any figures for that.

Derek

> Does anyone know the upper limits of energy efficiency on these turbines?  I
> know with a conventional ICE engine, a major reason for looking to fuel cells 
> as
> alternatives is that ICE engines are permanently limited by Carnot Cycle
> inefficiencies.  Even though many fuel cells are not yet above 40-50%
> efficiency, their theoretical efficiencies are much higher than ICE engines.  
> Is
> this also true of Microturbines?
> 
> The HEV success stories on the page you link all appear to be very large
> vehicles (busses).  I wonder if there's a reason.
> 
> MM


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Microturbines vs fuel cells

2003-10-30 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I'm really excited about these microturbines. The tubine/generator shaft is 
supported on air bearings. There aren't any lubricants. The things will run 
24/7 with minimal maintenance only needing an air filter change once a year 
or so. The exhaust is exceedingly clean. They will run on diesel, biodiesel, 
kerosene, and probably ethanol. They can also run on gaseous fuels such as 
natural gas, propane, LNG, and I am sure they could be adjusted for hydrogen 
when and if that becomes available. Which leaves me wondering WHY do we need 
fuel cells? Right now, we have a running technology, Hakan's ready to use 
technology, that apparently can do all, and more, of what is expected with a 
fuel cell. They can be used as the power source in a hybrid vehicle. I 
believe the problem with turbines in a direct drive vehicle was the 
difficulty of controlling accesleration and start up time. That wouldn't 
appear to be a problem in a hybrid that basically needs an engine running at 
a constant output.

I think they need to try and downsize the turbines to the output for a house 
sized unit. Then, put one in the house and turn it on, fueled with biodiesel. 
Turn off the power company. It can set up as a cogen, so one has space heat, 
hot water, and electricity, all at the same time.

Do we really need to wait all of those years for a fuel cell?

Derek

> Hi Derek, how goes?
> 
> Thanks for the links.
> 
> >I've been looking about the Internet at the new HEVs and have come across
> >these sites, which I don't recall being mentioned recently on this list. I
> >felt they make an interesting read.
> >
> >http://www.microturbine.com/caseStudies/hevCase1.asp
> >
> >Use of a microturbine for buses in an HEV application. Burning either diesel
> >or CNG. There are a lot of applications mentioned for these turbines with
> >mention of advantages over ICEs relative to noise, exhaust polution,
> >maintenance, etc.

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vhSowB/XP.FAA/3jkFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Changes

2003-10-30 Thread desertstallion

Hi Keith and all the list,

> Hi Derek, how goes?
>

I'm hoping to be more active on the list again. I've had trouble accessing 
the list through my company's firewall. Things are improving. Anyway, I have 
been reading through a couple of thousand messages and catching up!!

I've been thinking of back when I first joined the list and we had a minor 
celebration when we hit 500 members. Now I see we are heading for two 
thousand. Over the relatively few years that we have been visiting together, 
I think a lot of progress has been made with biofuels. Although it can seem 
frustrating at times, I think if one looks at where we have come from, a lot 
has been accomplished.

Also in the roughly four years of the list, Keith moved from Hong Kong to 
Japan, and has lived at two locations in Japan. I moved from Saudi, to 
Beijing, China, to Spain, and back to Saudi. I'm sure many others have also 
had personal upheavals!

During the four years of the list there have been two wars fought, many would 
say with energy concerns at the root of the cause for the conflicts. We've 
used up a lot more fossil fuels. Concerns that four years ago were discussed 
such as global warming are now becoming less theory and more real with recent 
news reports about the shrinking ice caps, etc.

But, the word is getting out about biofuels. More and more people are aware 
of them. More people are using them. Their time is here and now, and more so 
every day. Other things are helping. Wind energy is fast becoming a major 
player whereas four years ago it was just getting off the ground. Hybrid 
vehicles were more or less a concept four years ago. Now, they are close to 
making a major play. I'm sure everyone will have their own examples.

But, I do kind of feel that we are swimming just ahead of the wave. Hopefully 
fast enough to keep it from crashing on us. And, hopefully it won't be a 
tsunami.

Regards,

Derek



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ybSovB/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Available Agricultural Land

2003-10-30 Thread desertstallion

David,

I work in Saudi Arabia. One looks around and sees nothing but emptiness for 
miles. Much of it bakes in the summer and can't support agriculture as most 
of us know it. But, here they grow lots of vegetables in reverse green 
houses. These are translucent plastic structures kind of like a quonset hut. 
They have large fans at one end sucking air out of the hut, and at the other 
end they have evaporative water panels with air entering the hut through 
them. The hut is cooled by the evaporation and roughly 50% of the light goes 
through the translucent hut structure to provide enough light for the 
vegetables to grow.

Now, what would happen if you built PV panels, or some other solar collector, 
say twenty feet off the ground, that would collect fifty percent of the 
incident sunlight for electricity, or whatever, maybe even hydrogen. And, 
underneath, one could grow crops. One could have huge expanses of solar 
energy collection, and equally huge expanses of productive crop land. The 
Sahara, the Gobi, the Empty Quarter, etc. What about water needs? With that 
amount of electricity, evaporative production from the sea should be 
feasible. And, why stop there? Every couple of hundred feet, stick a wind 
generator up into the air. There is plenty of wind in Saudi. Now one has wind 
energy, solar energy, and more solar energy in the form of crops for biofuel, 
all from the same surface area of land that currently isn't being used for 
anything other than the occasional grazing camel.

Do I expect this any time soon? Of course not. But, it is an example of how 
we could make use of a lot of land that currently isn't used at all. What 
about roof top gardens?

And, if I recall correctly, someone said once on this list that we could meet 
10% of our transportation liquid fuel needs with biofuels obtained from 
currently WASTED vegetable oil, currently dumped in landfills. That would 
remove a big chunk of the need to produce biofuels from virgin oils.

There is research on producing oil from algae. Imagine huge floating areas of 
seaweed 'crops' in the ocean for oil. You see, we don't even need to consider 
available land mass.

All of this is possible. All of this is feasible with currently available 
technology. Ready for use as Hakan would say. Mostly it is a matter of 
political will to get on with it.

Derek


> This shows only too well how our addiction to mineral based fuels is 
> leading us to environmental disaster and possibly war. Here in the UK 
> we are beginning to see some biodiesel appearing on the garage 
> forecourts, though the industry is small here compared to France or 
> Germany. UK is a small country but even here we have 1.5 million 
> acres of set aside land.and if we reduced EU farming subsidies to 
> let the real price shine through we would have even more land which 
> could in theory be used for biofuel production...But realistically, 
> how much land would be required to replace mineral fuel consumption 
> with biofuels. The Economist reckons it would take about a quarter of 
> the Earth's primary production to produce enough biofuel...but has 
> anyone seen any detailed studies on that? Have they taken into 
> account some of the vast, uncultivated lands in Russia for example?
> 
> David
>

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Hybrid Electric Vehicles

2003-10-20 Thread desertstallion

I've been looking about the Internet at the new HEVs and have come across 
these sites, which I don't recall being mentioned recently on this list. I 
felt they make an interesting read.

http://www.microturbine.com/caseStudies/hevCase1.asp

Use of a microturbine for buses in an HEV application. Burning either diesel 
or CNG. There are a lot of applications mentioned for these turbines with 
mention of advantages over ICEs relative to noise, exhaust polution, 
maintenance, etc.

http://www.oshkoshtruck.com/defense/technology%7Eoverview.cfm

Here is a heavy truck application of an HEV system. What interested me about 
this was the use of 'ultracapacitors' instead of batteries for energy 
storage. There has been discussion in the past on this list of the problems 
associated with batteries and their ultimate disposal. This would appear to 
obviate much or all of this problem.

Regards,

Derek
> From a friend of mine (and from now yours too...): 
> 
> 1. The importance of presurization. in the making process and for what ??. 
> Why 
> use 700 pascals (or 0,7 bars)???.
> 
> 2. The big plants, use a depuration system with water in cascada and 
> sulphuric 
> acid, why and how ???.
> 
> 3. When one offers in the european union a biodiesel BD20, does it follow 
> EN950 
> Diesel standard ???.
> 
> 4. Which machine use to destille methanol in the plant and what porcentaje 
> one 
> misses in the reaction ??.-
> 
> 5. The concept of esterification ( grease alcohols) before 
> transesterification 
> (in some plants).
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Tq9otC/XP.FAA/3jkFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Arab News - Al-Jazeera TV Chief Sacked

2003-05-28 Thread desertstallion

Desert Stallion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has sent you an Arab News page

Personal Message:

Relative to corruption in media: It looks like it isn't just US media
that slants the facts!!

__
http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=26740

Al-Jazeera TV Chief Sacked
5/28/2003

Mohammed Alkhereiji, Arab News Staff



JEDDAH, 28 May 2003 รท In a devastating blow to its reputation,
Al-Jazeera said yesterday that its general director has been sacked
after allegations were made that he worked with Saddam Husseinรขs
intelligence services. Mohammed Jassem Al-Ali visited Iraq before the
US-led war, meeting Saddam during an hour-long interview. 

Both Al-Jazeera and Ali were afterward accused by the Western media of
collaborating with the former regime in Baghdad.

Ali had held the top job at the Doha-based station since it launched the
Arabic-language channel in 1996.

Ahmed Chalabi, leader of the American-backed Iraqi National Congress,
has accused several Al-Jazeera journalists of working for Iraqi agencies
based on documents found in state archives in Baghdad.

An Al-Jazeera spokesman refused to comment on the dismissal when
contacted by Arab News last night.

Washington and London blasted Al-Jazeera after the network carried
footage from Iraqi television of dead coalition soldiers and prisoners
of war, as well as repeated images of Iraqi civilians badly wounded in
airstrikes.



__
Arab News
Saudi Arabia's First English Language Daily
http://www.arabnews.com/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Arab News - Gas Plant Ready Ahead of Schedule

2003-05-25 Thread desertstallion

Desert Stallion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has sent you an Arab News page

Personal Message:

FYI relative to the recent discussion on natural gas.

__
http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=26617

Gas Plant Ready Ahead of Schedule
5/25/2003

Agence France Presse



RIYADH, 25 May 2003 รท Haradh Gas Plant, the second multibillion-dollar
project for non-associated gas in Saudi Arabia, has started experimental
production and is almost ready to come on-stream, Saudi Aramco said
yesterday.

รฃPartial production of Haradh Gas Plant started on April 23, as the
first processing unit of the plant began operation,รค Nasser Al-Nafisi,
head of Saudi Aramco public relations, said in a statement.

The plant will be on stream with full capacity at the end of July, five
months ahead of schedule, Nafisi added.

The project, under way 280 km (175 miles) southwest of Dhahran, is part
of Aramcoรขs long-term program of non-associated gas exploration and
development.

It will increase gas supplies by 1.5 billion cubic feet (42.5 million
cubic meters) per day to the Kingdomรขs Master Gas System (MGS), bringing
the companyรขs combined gas production to about seven billion cubic feet
(198.2 million cubic meters).

The plant is designed to process 1.6 billion cubic feet (45.3 million
cubic meters) of non-associated feed gas daily, increasing the total
amount of feed gas to be processed by the MGS to about nine billion
cubic feet (254.8 million cubic meters).

The project will recover 145,000 barrels per day (bpd) of high quality
condensates, which will be transported to Abqaiq plants for treatment
via a 230-km (144-mile) pipeline.

Haradh is a twin of the Hawiyah Gas Plant, which was commissioned in
2002 as Saudi Arabiaรขs first non-associated gas plant, adding 1.5
billion cubic feet of gas to the MGS and boosting gas supplies by more
than 30 percent.

The two plants are located in Ghawar, the largest oilfield in the world,
and are expected to almost double the Kingdomรขs gas production.

Hawiyah also produces 160,000 barrels of hydrocarbon condensates and
1,000 metric tons of sulfur each day.

The project transported gas by pipeline for the first time to the Riyadh
area to fuel three electric power plants, which previously consumed
crude oil. 

Resorting to gas-fired systems has freed up a considerable amount of
crude for export. 

Gas-fired plants are also more environmentally friendly.

Gas production is due to reach around 10 billion cubic feet (283.1
million cubic meters) per day by 2010.

The MGS network, set up some 25 years ago, extends from the Gulf to the
Red Sea, and from the north to the south of the Kingdom.

Saudi Arabiaรขs proven natural gas reserves grew in the past decade to
224 trillion cubic feet (6.34 trillion cubic meters), the fourth largest
in the world, about 85 trillion (2.41 trillion cubic meters) of which is
non-associated gas.

Aramco officials say that initial assessments indicate that vast
reserves remain to be discovered in many parts of the Kingdom. The
assessments suggest that Saudi Arabia holds one of the largest and most
accessible gas reserves in the world.

Saudi Arabia is currently the worldรขs leading oil producer and exporter
with production well above nine million barrels a day, but it will be
slashed to 8.256 million barrels on June 1.

The Kingdom signed in June 2001 preliminary agreements with eight
international oil companies for three mega gas projects worth some $25
billion in investments.

Final agreements on the projects have been delayed several times, but
the Kingdom now expects to sign deals on two of the three projects soon.

The Kingdomรขs gas industry employs about 35,000 workers in direct jobs
in gas production, processing, manufacturing and marketing operations.



__
Arab News
Saudi Arabia's First English Language Daily
http://www.arabnews.com/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Wind Power -- a European Success Story

2003-05-20 Thread desertstallion

NO...Because it is intermittent, wind can not be relied upon for use in the on-
demand part of the power supply. The wind might die just when you need it. 
Therefore, if it is in the base supply, and the wind dies, the on-demand stuff 
such as gas turbine supply can kick in to make up the deficit.

The wind generators spread through the Pyrenees in Spain cover such a large 
geographical area, that I would assume that there would be a fairly constant 
average production. This, IMO, would work well in the base power production, 
and would obviate any need to try to engineer storage solutions. Any storage 
mechanism I have ever seen was quite wasteful of power. They only were of use 
because they made use of 'waste power' during times of low use. If the swings 
in power consumption can be minimized, and the use of on-demand power 
optimized, there would be little need for storage.

For the home producer of wind power, then some form of storage would be 
needed, or use of the grid as a large 'battery', since one would be dependent 
upon a single wind generator. For when the wind dies, one would need the 
storage backup or an alternate source of power, such as a biodiesel fueled 
generator.

Derek

Derek

Derek
> intermittent power by its very nature cannot be used for base.
> Wind can displace gas turbine power because the gas turbine can quickly fill
> the gap if the wind drops.
> Kirk
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 4:16 AM
> To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] Wind Power -- a European Success Story
> 
> 
> My understnding is that in most places in the world they use the cheapest
> form
> of electricity in the base. Then, as demand increases, they add more
> expensive
> forms. So...they have a large base of hydro and coal. As demand increases in
> the summer, they might add gas turbine generated electricity to meet this
> peak
> demand. My feeling on wind power is that you would never need to worry about
> storage. Just feed it into the base use of electricity. Try to build it up
> to a
> relatively large percentage of total use. However, you wouldn't try to make
> it
> 100%. Maybe 80% of peak use, covering the valleys. Then, supplement with
> biodiesel fired generators, or some other source, for the final 20% or so.
> No
> need for storage, and all demands are met with renewables.
> 
> Where my in-laws live in Spain, they are attaining approvimately 20% of the
> region's electrical demand from wind generation. Another percentage comes
> from
> burning straw/hay in a power plant. The remainder of need on top of this
> comes
> from various non-renewable sources, which hopefully will be diminished.
> 
> Derek
> > On Sat, 17 May 2003 12:20 am, Bryan Brah wrote:
> > > As Hakan has said storage of wind generated electricity will be the
> > > hardest problem to solve if we are to rely on it for our power needs.
> >
> > actually, any environmentally derived power has this problem, potentially.
> >
> > specifically, the amount of power cannot be shifted to meet demand
> > arbitrarily.
> >
> > so, we can either store the power, over provision, or change our
> lifestyles to
> > match the available power not mutually exclusive ofcourse. personally
> I
> > think we need to do all three. :-)
> >
> > storing power is actually relatively easy.  batteries are fine but lossy
> and
> > environmentally troublesome, but they work. energy density is a serious
> > problem here... I beileve (from memory) that zinc is a reasonable material
> > for storage of electrical power.
> >
> > better from my pov is PV decomp of water then use the Sabtier Reaction
> > (reverse water gas) to make methane from H2 + CO2 over Pt hotwire or
> Alumina
> 
> > supported catalyst. - or just store the H2 - though this has other
> problems.
> >
> > when you want to use the power pass the methane or H2 through a fuel cell,
> > keeping the reaction products for the charging cycle... :-)  liquid fuel
> self
> > presurising battery!
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr Paul van den Bergen
> > Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
> > caia.swin.edu.au
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > IM:bulwynkl2002
> > "And some run up hill and down dale, knapping the chucky stones
> > to pieces wi' hammers, like so many road makers run daft.
> > They say it is to see how the world was made."
> > Sir Walter Scott, St. Ronan's Well 1824
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >
> > Biofuels list archives:
> 
> > http://archive.nnytech.net/
> >
> > Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe m

Re: [biofuel] Wind Power -- a European Success Story

2003-05-19 Thread desertstallion

My understnding is that in most places in the world they use the cheapest form 
of electricity in the base. Then, as demand increases, they add more expensive 
forms. So...they have a large base of hydro and coal. As demand increases in 
the summer, they might add gas turbine generated electricity to meet this peak 
demand. My feeling on wind power is that you would never need to worry about 
storage. Just feed it into the base use of electricity. Try to build it up to a 
relatively large percentage of total use. However, you wouldn't try to make it 
100%. Maybe 80% of peak use, covering the valleys. Then, supplement with 
biodiesel fired generators, or some other source, for the final 20% or so. No 
need for storage, and all demands are met with renewables.

Where my in-laws live in Spain, they are attaining approvimately 20% of the 
region's electrical demand from wind generation. Another percentage comes from 
burning straw/hay in a power plant. The remainder of need on top of this comes 
from various non-renewable sources, which hopefully will be diminished.

Derek 
> On Sat, 17 May 2003 12:20 am, Bryan Brah wrote:
> > As Hakan has said storage of wind generated electricity will be the
> > hardest problem to solve if we are to rely on it for our power needs.
> 
> actually, any environmentally derived power has this problem, potentially.
> 
> specifically, the amount of power cannot be shifted to meet demand 
> arbitrarily.
> 
> so, we can either store the power, over provision, or change our lifestyles 
> to 
> match the available power not mutually exclusive ofcourse. personally I 
> think we need to do all three. :-)
> 
> storing power is actually relatively easy.  batteries are fine but lossy and 
> environmentally troublesome, but they work. energy density is a serious 
> problem here... I beileve (from memory) that zinc is a reasonable material 
> for storage of electrical power.
> 
> better from my pov is PV decomp of water then use the Sabtier Reaction 
> (reverse water gas) to make methane from H2 + CO2 over Pt hotwire or Alumina 

> supported catalyst. - or just store the H2 - though this has other problems.
> 
> when you want to use the power pass the methane or H2 through a fuel cell, 
> keeping the reaction products for the charging cycle... :-)  liquid fuel self 
> presurising battery!
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Paul van den Bergen
> Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
> caia.swin.edu.au
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> IM:bulwynkl2002
> "And some run up hill and down dale, knapping the chucky stones 
> to pieces wi' hammers, like so many road makers run daft. 
> They say it is to see how the world was made."
> Sir Walter Scott, St. Ronan's Well 1824 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:

> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: Here's the proof: was, I think Bush pressed the button Was: [biofuel] Bush's "Christian" Blood Cult

2003-05-02 Thread desertstallion

Well, it could be a big conspiracy. Or, it could just be inept bungling. My 
own vote is for ineptness. And, I think your mention of the Barbarian Horde 
interesting, but in another light. The Romans got sloppy, over-confident, 
lazy, and inept and got their butts kicked. I think the West, as epitomized by 
the U.S. is becoming increasingly lazy, inept and over-confident. I just hope 
we can get our collective wits about us before we, too, get our butts kicked.

I have had to deal with a lot of executives of a Fortune 500 company. This is 
supposedly a premier company in the U.S. It is sad to say that I am amazed 
that they haven't gone bankrupt. They are wallowing in ineptitude. I fear that 
this is just one example of a general phenomena.

Compare the U.S. educational system to the European one, or just about any 
other country. We are in a lot of trouble and it is getting worse. A company 
can go to China and get Chinese labor for USD 80.00/month, AND, they are 
better educated than the general workers in the U.S., from what I have seen.

We can not afford to continue to pump money into the military, and a bunch of 
other similar programs without rebuilding our own foundations. In general, I 
have in the past been a proponent of a strong military, but I am getting 
literally frightened that the U.S. is going to implode if we don't start 
giving some serious attention to our domestic needs. It won't matter what we 
do overseas, and it won't matter how much the politicians try and divert our 
attention with foreign policy. In my opinion, our entire social structure is 
facing collapse. We can not project strong foreign policy if we don't have the 
foundation to project from.

Relative to the conspiracy theories and the politicians, I think our only full-
time defense or the guys working full-time to root out the bad apples. I am 
referring to the journalists. Sure some of the media isn't doing as well as 
they should, and some have been bought. And, we have to guard against the info-
mercials and other public relations ploys to feed us propaganda under the 
guise of news. But, if we didn't have the true blue journalists hounding the 
politicians, and keeping them honest, we would be much worse off. I have lived 
in a lot of countries with a controlled press, and the freedom of the Western 
press is one of the most important factors to keep our free country free.

Regards,

Derek




> I believe that when the truth is told about our current
> regime (Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush), this period in
> history will be called the most corrupt government of all
> time. Even the Barbarian Horde did nothing more sinister
> and evil than these good ol' boys. 
> 
> That's right, I'm saying that the same group has been in
> power since 1981, and with the exception of Jimmy Carter
> this group probably goes all the way back to the Johnson
> administration.
> 
> kris
> 
> --- MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://www.wanttoknow.info/911timeline10pg
> > > 
> > > This guy uses mainstream media to tell the real story,
> > or
> > > at least a more believeable story than the Republican
> > spin
> > > we've been getting.
> > > 
> > > kris
> > 
> > 
> >  Thank you Kris!  That's quite a bit of documentation
> > about -- 
> >  The 9/11 Timeline 10-Page Summary
> >  Was 9/11 Allowed to Happen?  


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/uetFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Energy use in buildings was: 42,850 Traffic Deaths in 2002

2003-05-01 Thread desertstallion

The earlier statistic of deaths per total population was worthless and a 
complete non-starter for conversation. It would have no relevance. To take it 
to an extreme, put the billion plus Chinese in the denominator, most of who 
don't have cars and have never driven. It would make it look like the Chinese 
have a great road system and great drivers. Anyone who has been there knows 
this is not the case.

I believe the statistic comparing deaths per billion kilometers per year would 
be much more valid. However, I would concede Hakan's point that it could be 
distorted by professional drivers putting on thousands of miles per week. A 
statistic based on deaths per number of vehicles would also be closer than 
deaths per total population but can be distorted by numbers of vehicles owned 
per driver and by the drivers who hardly ever drive. For example, my brother-
in-law in Europe has a car that sits in the garage except for about one use 
per month. He walks and uses city buses for almost all his needs. Most 
intercity transportation is by bus or train. Most inter-country transport is 
by train or plane.


Re: [biofuel] Energy use in buildings was: 42,850 Traffic Deaths in 2002

2003-05-01 Thread desertstallion

IIRC the airbags on US cars require an impact of around 20-25 mph. So...I 
think they are roughly the same as what you are stating for Australia - 
roughly 30 kph.

Most of the deaths and injuries associated with airbags were in front seat 
passengers, especially children, incorrectly placed in car seats facing the 
wrong direction. There has been a campaign to have car seats/children only in 
the rear seats.

Derek
> Yes, it is a high figure, but everyone i know wears their seatbelt when 
> they get in a vehicle.
> It is not secondary.
> 
> -- 
> ---
> Martin Klingensmith
> http://nnytech.net/
> http://infoarchive.net/
> 
> 
> paul van den bergen wrote:
> 
> >Do we all agree that it is too high a figure?
> >
> >
> >
> >aside:  about 2 years ago there was a beatup media story here about airbags 
> >killing dogs and children and it being safer not to install them.  Turns out 
> >the story was taken direct from the US news feeds without references to the 
> >differences in driving behaviour between the US and Australia.  Now, I don't 
> >know this for sure, but I get teh impression that seatbelts are fairly much 
> >regarded as optional in the US, where as in Australia they have been 
> >compulsory for so long it is habitual.  I was told the reason for the high 
> >incident of airbag deaths was because in the US (with low seat belt use) 
> >they 
> >were the _primary_ restraint mechanism (trigger threshold set at ~10 kph) 
> >where as in Oz they are definitely the secondary restraint (trigger 
> >threshold 
> >set at ~30 kph - I.e. will not deploy if the car is going less than 30 kph).
> >
> >Like I said I do not know if this is the whole truth, but there you go... I 
> >for instance can see problems if you are a stationary vehicle being 
> >impacted *shrug*


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/uetFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: I think Bush pressed the button Was: [biofuel] Bush's "Christian" Blood Cult

2003-05-01 Thread desertstallion

Well, you admit you don't know anything. And, Steve speaks up like he knows, 
but in reality he doesn't know anything either, or at least he hasn't proven 
that he knows what he says he knows. And, this started because someone writes 
an article that they think they know what the Pope knows about Bush. In 
reality, it is doubtful that the Pope knows anything about what Bush knows, 
unless he has more than the usual divine inspiration, because it is doubtful 
that even Bush knows what he knows. All I know, or at least I think I know, is 
that this is a lot of people knowing a lot about nothing.

Derek

> If you asked me, I would say that 'ol GWB not only "knew" about the 9/11
> beforehand guys ... but in reality "caused" it.   No, I have absolutely,
> positively NO proof.  It is a statement I make .. only from the chill I get
> up my spine when I hear reports that ... I think a YEAR before 9/11 .. some
> "Haliburton/TransAfghanistan pipeline deal" went sour ... The "deal was
> given to (I think) Argentina"  EARLY SUMMER, Afghanistan INVASION plans
> were ALREADY made.
> 
> And then I think back ... YES, we invaded Afghanistan .. NOW "WHAT" WAS
> THE "REASON" THAT WE INVADED NOW??  DOES ANYONE RECALL WHAT IT
> WAS??
> 
> This, plus that report about how Colin Powell used (I think) some kind of
> old college papers as "proof" in the UN security council (please correct me
> if I'm mistaken).   That showed me that the current Administration is an
> all-out, dragged down extremely "ends-justify-the-means" thinking
> administration.   THIS ... plus the control that power of the President has
> over the media .. plus the chain of events (above) leading UP to the
> invasion. ...
> 
> Guys, I have ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF about what I'm implying.   So no sense
> start a debate (about me "proving" anything).  I concede from the start that
> my thoughts ... are merely conjecture.But I thought I'd mentioned my
> "spine-chill" ... since you guys were talking about all this.
> 
> Oh, and btw, KEITH .. good to be back!!
> 
> Curtis
> 
> Get your free newsletter at
> http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Steve Spence:  according to the article the pope thinks that the Bush
> Administration knew about the 9-11 attack beforehand.  Incorrect,
> 
> Keith: How do you know that? I'm not saying they did, and not saying you're
> wrong, but maybe we could use just a little more than your usual unsupported
> 2- or 3-word dismissal, some information maybe, some facts, some references,
> source material?


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/uetFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] yurts

2003-04-30 Thread desertstallion

Where I worked in Beijing we had a large yurt that was used as a meeting and 
conference room. It was high-tech, insulated, and with electric heating and 
air-conditioning. Other than the shape I don't think it had much similarity to 
the yurts of Mongolia. The irony of it was that it was manufactured in the 
USA, Oregon or Washington. One advantage was as a yurt it was classed as a 
temporary building and a lot of the restrictions on construction didn't apply.

Have you considered using 20 foot ISO containers for shelter. There are a lot 
of creative uses for these containers, which can be purchased fairly cheaply 
if they are used. They can be used as modules for any size home. Take a look 
at . For example, they have hospitals using 100 container 
modules.

I like the fact that containers have their own internal strength independent 
of any need for a foundation. One doesn't need to clutter the environment with 
foundations. They should be essentially earthquake proof. Obviously they would 
move around in an earthquake, but not be destroyed. They can be moved here and 
there with a truck. You can move your house with you. The containers can be 
recycled/reused indefinitely. Each container is water and air tight except at 
the doors. They can be infinitely modified according to one's needs. They are 
also stackable, so ground space can be conserved if necessary.

I am thinking of starting with one for storage. Later, modifying one for a 
workshop. And, then, one for an office. Maybe one for the still, biodiesel, 
fuel storage, and generator. The nice thing, if I move somewhere else, I just 
close them up, and have someone haul them to my new place. I donรขt have to 
pack up everything separately and reorganize it in the new location.

Derek


>  >
> >Greetings everybody.
> >I have been looking into yurts and so far I like what I see.  They seem to
> >be a very low impact housing alternative.  Might anyone have experience
> >living in one or have some knowledge that could prove useful?
> > 
> 
> A pal of mine has a couple in the desert in Almeria -  S  Spain. He's called 
> David Dene and you can contact him on... 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> James
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/GwtQXA/XP.FAA/AG3JAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] 42,850 Traffic Deaths in 2002

2003-04-27 Thread desertstallion

Dear Hakan,

For the US, accidents per vehicle would not be valid, since many drivers own 
and operate two, three, or more vehicles. When I used to live and work in the 
US, I put around 30,000 miles/year on three vehicles. Wouldn't my risk of an 
accident, as a driver, have to based on my 30,000 miles/year of driving, not 
on a per vehicle basis? I think the more valid measure for comparison between 
countries would be the accidents/total miles driven by all drivers/year.

Derek Hargis
> 
> Martin,
> 
> You are very right, the most common professional way to compare is
> accidents per vehicles and/or distance driven. For those countries that
> we have been talking about, it does not make a very large difference.
> It would be very skewed if we started to include countries like India
> or China, who would have very low death per population.
> 
> I think that Kim touched very valid points, education, experience and
> attitudes. It is also what the people who works with the issues are
> saying. The European countries have 18 years old as limit for car
> driving licence, 16 years for light motor bike and 15 years for moped.
> The training, tests and exams are more extensive. Skidding training
> are mandatory and certificate is necessary for drivers licence.
> 
> Germany have much better statistics than US, that is a fact. I can
> understand your sister, you must be very disciplined to drive on
> German autobahn. Having higher normal speeds, with many who
> drives at 100-130 miles per hour is scary, but they are more predictable
> and follow the rules. I am more afraid on US highways, since the US
> drivers are less predictable and less respect for rules.
> 
> US is among the leaders on accidents and fatalities what ever way
> you look at the numbers. US is also leader on murder rates, largely
> because of the gun laws. This is part of the constitutional rights, freedom,
> corporate interests and the right to do business. If you change it, you
> will end up with a suppressed society, like all other countries in the
> world. I do not understand why the terrorists want to kill a few people,
> when the Americans are so good in doing it themselves. Look only
> at president Bush and the watering down of taken pollution decisions,
> it will prematurely kill more people than many of the bad guys in other
> countries have done. This is a well researched fact.
> 
> With all the people that are prepared to twist and hide realities, after
> all it is all a conspiracy to "bash the Americans", it is hard to defend
> common sense. Intelligence and common sense is the arch enemies
> of corporate America and the "American way of life". I am not on a
> crusade for saving American lives, only to beg them to save some
> energy resources for developing the rest of the world.
> 
> Hakan
> 
> At 01:50 AM 4/27/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >I hear about massive accidents on the German autobahn all the time. I
> >remember my sister telling me how she was so scared because everyone
> >drove extremely fast.
> >You can't just compare x deaths out of n people. Like any statistic it
> >depends on everything else remotely related to it.
> >
> >Hakan Falk wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Germany have less than Australia and have more intersecting
> > >highways, higher density and in many highways no speed limit.
> > >
> > >Sweden and Switzerland have around 1 death per 85,000 or nearly
> > >1/9 of US.
> > >
> > >Hakan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >---
> >Martin Klingensmith
> >http://nnytech.net/
> >http://infoarchive.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] 42,850 Traffic Deaths in 2002

2003-04-26 Thread desertstallion

To compare driving fatalities of the USA with other countries on a per capita 
basis is worthless. There needs to be consideration of the higher miles/person 
driven in a year. People do everything by car in the US, from shopping, 
working, commuting, entertainment, to the Sunday drive for no good reason 
other than to go for a drive. This is just not seen in any other country in my 
experience. To hop in a car and drive for eight hours to visit someone would 
be unheard of in most other countries, but is fairly common in the USA. The 
twelve lanes of traffic on the NJ TP into and out of NYC is not seen in many 
other countries. The beltway of Washington, D.C., is at least five lanes in 
each direction. And, so on. The speeds traveled on these roads is around 75 
mph regardless of posted speeds. So...you have a lot of congestion plus high 
speeds.

Seatbelt laws and helmet laws have been in place in the USA for years with the 
exception of a few states. They could be more strongly enforced, but they are 
there.

The bigger problem than seatbelts and helmets is alcohol and other drugs. A 
very high percentage of single vehicle accidents involves someone under the 
influence. A high percentage of all accidents involves at least one of the 
drivers being under the influence. There are continuous attempts to curb this, 
with varying degrees of success. Part of the problem is again the structure of 
our communities. For example, in many areas in Europe one can go out with 
buddies and walk about to a multitude of bars/discos, etc., and not need to 
get about except by walking or using mass-transit. In the States, in many 
areas it is very difficult to do anything without driving. So...there are 
attempts to get people to designate a driver who remains sober while everyone 
else has a party. This tends not to be very successful. But, in other 
countries, in Europe for example, it often doesn't even become an issue.

Finally, there is a trade off between well engineered roads and possible 
traffic speeds. And...speed kills in more ways than one. When I lived in 
Beijing the driving was absolutely the worst I have ever seen. But, the 
fatalities were very low because no one could manage to drive faster than 
about 20 mph because of the congestion. The same when I was in Cairo. 
Everything was so bumper to bumper that although there were small accidents 
all the time, very few fatalities. When I was in India a drive of only 110 
kilometers took me five hours because of the state of the road. Again, much 
more difficult to go fast enough to have a fatality. In Saudi Arabia, I read 
that it had or has the highest per capita fatality rate. Well...fairly good 
roads and people driving at 100 mph all the time. If one loses a tire at 100 
mph/161 kph, there is a good chance it will be the last time.

Another thing is a higher number of accidents by either very young drivers or 
very old drivers. Many states in the USA allow driving at 16 and with minimum 
instruction. From my experience in Spain, which I assume pertains to much of 
the rest of Europe, where my daughter is coming up on eighteen, the minimum 
age is 18, and she has to take formal instruction in a driving school and pass 
a fairly rigorous written examination and driving test. To my knowledge, no 
state in the USA requires driving school. One can learn any old way and take 
the test. The tests in the USA tend to be very simple compared to what I have 
seen in Spain. Also, in Spain, older drivers have to retest and demonstrate 
that they have not become too impaired by health reasons to drive safely.

So, the stats need to be adjusted for miles driven/year/person. There needs to 
be consideration for the condition of the roads, and speeds at which drivers 
drive. There needs to be changes in the way people relax with meaningful 
alternatives so people won't tend to drive under the influence - for example, 
greater availability of mass transit, more taxi and limousine services. There 
needs to be better driver's education and consideration to raising the minimum 
driving age. It is a multi-factorial problem. Regardless of comparisons with 
other countries, much can still be done to cut this death rate in all 
countries.

Derek Hargis

> On 24 Apr 2003 at 20:52, murdoch wrote:
> 
> > As I mentioned last month, I am in favor of looking into greater
> > computer control of vehicles, or, more accurately, gradually increased
> > automated vehicle driving and warning systems, integrated with driver
> > command, to reduce traffic deaths.  I believe such a trend has been
> > implemented, over the decades, in modern jumbo jets and has saved
> > lives.  It has not proven to be a cure-all and premature turning of
> > jet control over to full computer control has proven, on at least one
> > occassion, to be fatal.  But I think if something can be done to
> > reduce the dangers of driving then it ought be looked-into.  IMO.
> > 
> > http://www.napanews.com/templates/inde

RE: [biofuel] [democracies]

2003-04-22 Thread desertstallion

Dear Brah,

>I see no solution to the current system but it's
> destruction and replacement by another.

I sincerely hope we don't have to return to square one after all the work to 
get this far. Granted there are lots of problems, but can't you find anything 
worth building on? If we keep starting over, we aren't going to get anywhere. 
Especially if we keep repeating the mistakes. Please, let us work on what 
we've got and try and change it towards something better. I honestly don't 
believe it is impossible to improve our present world. It is one small step at 
a time, and one gets there. Many small steps. Please don't get dismayed by the 
size of the problem. Bring your focus in closer and keep biting and chewing. 
Just look at this forum, these discussions, and grassroots efforts on 
biofuels, as an example. The big boys think they have the world sewn up with 
big oil. Meanwhile, there is a ground swell of biofuel coming that is going to 
wash big oil away. Yes, the media could do better. And, yes, there is 
corruption in the States and elsewhere. But, I also think we have come a long 
way since my childhood when Kennedy and Johnson and Nixon and so forth got 
away with what they did. Relatively speaking they have to walk on egg shells 
these days or some journalist is going to call them out. I think the media 
tends to slant things, but I don't think it is rotten to the core. They are 
still playing a valuable and essential role at keeping the politicians honest
(I hope).

Derek Hargis

> Keith,
> 
> I sincerely appreciate this lively philosophical debate.  When I have
> attempted in the past to paraphrase and restate what I believe to be
> your position, you accused me of "putting words in your mouth."  Perhaps
> it is due to the fact that I am a product of the US public education
> system, or just my own innate inability to think critically, but I am
> having difficulty understanding what exactly you believe.  
> 
>  
> 
> As you have probably gathered, I am very suspicious of government and
> the media it controls, and expect everyone else to be equally cynical
> concerning power.  I see no solution to the current system but it's
> destruction and replacement by another.  Barring this revolution, the
> only things that individuals can do against the current power structure
> is to try and gain a modicum of independence by existing as much as
> possible outside the political/economic/media sphere (i.e. living
> simply, growing food, making fuel, bartering, etc.).  Furthermore, while
> we can't really improve the system, we can slow the erosion of our
> economic and political freedom by letting those in power know that we
> are watching them.  The only way to do this is by educating ourselves
> and spreading the word about what is happening.  
> 
>  
> 
> As someone who has put small-scale sustainability into practice, it
> seems (at least superficially) that you hold some of the same values as
> I.  However, it is apparent from your rebuttals that you disagree with
> me.  Will you graciously indulge me by (re)stating exactly what you
> perceive the problem to be and what you feel we can do to fix it?
> 
>  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> -BRAH


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/AG3JAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] World history - Geneva Convention

2003-04-22 Thread desertstallion

Hakan,

I'm not sure about your point on NATO. As I understand it, NATO was set up 
during the cold war to stand again the Soviet block. Since the cold war is 
over, is it needed? I think the 'Hawks' in the U.S.A. would say that NATO 
wasn't very beneficial to the U.S. cause during this last Iraq war. I think 
they would probably say the U.S. might as well withdraw from NATO and seek 
bilateral agreements where they are most beneficial. I also think they would 
say that it is about time for the Europeans to stand on their own feet and not 
expect the U.S. to continue to cover for them!! Certainly the U.S. could save 
heaps of tax money to better spend on domestic programs if they withdrew from 
Germany. They could probably meet all their current needs with the air base in 
the UK, the naval station in Rota, Spain, and air refueling points in the 
Azores and Spain. Personally, I think Europe has made such strides with the 
common market, the common currency, and common standards, that they should 
strive for more independence in defense matters.

I totally agree with you that the ransacking of the museum in Bagdad is a 
tragedy beyond words. I also am horrified that the Iraqi National Library and 
Archives were burned (who was trying to cover up 30 some years of crimes??). 
The only thing that I can say, is that I don't think the U.S. imagined that 
the Iraqis would do it to themselves, and that these places needed to be 
defended against their own people. The looters were even ransacking their own 
hospitals, according to reports that I have read. I don't think anyone 
anticipated the level of looting. It is so against Islam to steal. I guess it 
is an indication of how absolutely downtrodden and destitute the people 
were/are. The oil fields and the oil ministry would have been seen as economic 
targets of the old regime which needed to be defended. So...although I agree 
with you that it is awful, I don't read into it some sort of hidden agenda. 
Swallow thinking, yes. Lack of anticipation, yes. Stubborn arrogance on the 
part of Rumsfield, yes. Lack of the foresight to put sufficient troops on the 
ground to cover unplanned needs, yes. And, relative to this last point, some 
of this was due to the fact that the U.S. did not open up the northern 
approach from Turkey due to Turkey not allowing this. This meant that the 
entire fourth division that would have entered from the north was still 
sitting on its hands in Texas. The U.S. had a very slimmed down plan as it 
was, and the fact that these troops didn't enter, made it very much more 
difficult. So...they could blow things up from the air, but not have 
sufficient troops on the ground to do things like protect strategic areas, to 
protect things like the archives and the museum.

For your thoughts,

Derek Hargis

> 
> Andrew,
> 
> I agree.
> 
> It seems to me that the biggest challenge for the world is
> if it can deal with the Iraq events in an evenhanded way. It
> means that the "Coalition of the Barbarians" (referring  to
> the cultural education that made them protect the oil ministry
> instead of the heritage of the world), should stand scrutiny
> according to the Geneva convention.
> 
> UN is now needed more than ever and NATO should be
> dismantled in favor of a EU defence organization. The
> world need some balance.
> 
> Hakan
> 
> 
> At 10:21 AM 4/22/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> >On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 13:19:30 +0200, "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > Bush, Rumsfeld, Powell, Blair and Howard have secured a prominent place
> > > in
> > > the world history,...
> >
> >snip
> >
> > >..It is also a war crime, according to the Geneva convention.
> > >
> > > Hakan
> > >
> >
> >I,ve seen a number of photos of dead Iraqi soldiers holding white flags.
> >One of the pictures was on the front page of the UK 'Independent'
> >newspaper, showing two soldiers dead in a 2-3 man dug-out trench, one
> >clutching a white flag. Several US soldiers stood by the trench.
> >
> >None of this seems to have attracted any comment whatsoever in mainstream
> >media discussion.
> >
> >
> >Andrew Preston


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/AG3JAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] World history - Geneva Convention

2003-04-22 Thread desertstallion

Andrew,

I think your assumption is that this photo indicates that the U.S. troops 
killed Iraqis who were in the process of surrendering. I obviously don't have 
any idea as I wasn't there, BUT the photo alone is not proof of this. It was 
widely reported in the 'mainstream press' that Iraqis were approaching U.S. 
troops with white flags, and when close enough, dropping the flags and opening 
fire against the troops. Maybe this is what happened and why they were shot. 
Also, the fact that troops stood there in the picture doesn't prove that they 
are the ones who shot them. They could have found the dead men hours after 
they were shot, and just appear 'guilty' since they are in the picture.

Pictures can lie too, especially out of context.

Derek Hargis
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 13:19:30 +0200, "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > 
> > Bush, Rumsfeld, Powell, Blair and Howard have secured a prominent place
> > in 
> > the world history,...
> 
> snip 
> 
> >..It is also a war crime, according to the Geneva convention.
> > 
> > Hakan 
> > 
> 
> I,ve seen a number of photos of dead Iraqi soldiers holding white flags.
> One of the pictures was on the front page of the UK 'Independent'
> newspaper, showing two soldiers dead in a 2-3 man dug-out trench, one
> clutching a white flag. Several US soldiers stood by the trench. 
> 
> None of this seems to have attracted any comment whatsoever in mainstream
> media discussion. 
>   
> 
> Andrew Preston
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/AG3JAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: Invisibility Was: [biofuel] Re: How We Lost the Victory

2003-04-21 Thread desertstallion

Well...I think one of the big social changes that we are experiencing is this 
formum and what makes it possible...the Internet. Never before has the little 
guy had so much information from so many sources so available to him. And, the 
means to discuss it with anyone around the globe. It is a lot more difficult 
for someone to misrepresent things these days. People can get on the Internet 
and check sources, discuss with others, etc., from the smallest towns around 
the world. If someone wants to discuss and learn about biofuels, it might be 
difficult with a neighbor in Podunk, USA. But, I can sit in Saudi Arabia, and 
discuss things with Keith in Japan, Girl-Mark in California, Steve in New 
Jersey, Hakan in Sweden, and so on. That is amazingly powerful. I think it has 
started to, and will continue to, lead to incredible social change. 
Information is very powerful and will lead to democratization and other social 
benefits. 'Leaders' try to control people with lies, half-truths, propaganda, 
public relations campaigns, etc., but this should be more difficult if this 
medium is available. Look at the discussions we have had on this list recently 
about corporate PR and how they attempt to influence peoples thinking. Just 
our increased awareness from these discussions helps us realize and discount a 
lot of what we are being fed. Now, when someone discusses an event in the US 
Congress and its implications, such as a bill concerning oil drilling on the 
North Slope of Alaska, we can have people from Australia or India chiming in 
with their take of the event. If we want to influence voting in Congress by 
letting our Congressmen or Senators know what we think about something, we can 
have e-mail storms to get the word out to mobilize the electorate. Small 
groups should have less of an ability to slip things through, because the 
ability to get the word out to a tremendous number of people is increased by e-
mail and the Internet. Alternative views were never this public before. It 
used to be that one depended on books, newspapapers, regular mail newsletters, 
word-of-mouth, telephoning, etc. By the time someone found out something and 
cared to act on it, months could go by. But now, to use an example of the NRA, 
they can find out about something concerning gun control taking place in the 
Senate, and all million plus of their members know about it within hours and 
they are on the telephone calling up their representatives.

I don't want to sound too dramatic, but I truly can not think of any other 
single influence as important. It ranks with the industrial revolution and 
similar historical events on its importance.

Derek Hargis
> I would disagree.   I believe the world is becoming LESS democratic.   No
> matter what any report says.
> 
> Oh sure, votes are being taken ... laws enacted by counting those votes.
> But now PR agencies kick in ... paid for by powerful, invisible "small"
> groups of people ... who basically "sway" the votes ...one way or the other.
> The details  Keith explains it well (help me out here, Keith).
> 
> So once again ... a small group of people (sway the votes and ) control the
> laws being written.  Laws that govern (spelled R.U.L.E.S.) all.  Once again
> ... UNDEMOCRATIC.
> 
> So to me, the authoritarianism isn't really disappearing ... it's just going
> underground.
> 
> Curtis
> 
> Get your free newsletter at
> http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Hakan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Tom have to hurry up then -:), MH took the job to post this,
> 
> HDR 2002 (Human Development Report)
> The world is becoming more democratic.
> Democratic regimes on the rise as authoritarianism declines.
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Is SARS a scam? and of course, more conspiracy theory

2003-04-18 Thread desertstallion

I personally know people who are there fighting it.

Derek
> I would not bet my health that it's a scam.
> 
> http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/
> 
> 
> Steve Spence
> Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
> & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
> http://www.green-trust.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kris Book" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 1:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is SARS a scam? and of course, more conspiracy theory
> 
> 
> > http://sarsscam.com/
> >
> >
> > __
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> > http://search.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >
> > Biofuels list archives:
> > http://archive.nnytech.net/
> >
> > Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for 
Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Bringing democracy to Sweden

2003-04-12 Thread desertstallion

Dear Steve, Hakan, et. al.,

It seems to me that it would take someone with a degree in political science 
to appreciate and understand the differences between all of these forms 
of 'democratic' government.

But, it all started with some discussion around socialism and the support of 
society for the members of the society. It seems to me that this also goes 
back to the arguments about individual freedoms relative to the needs of 
society. We are all familiar with the discussion that frequently comes up 
about the individual right of the Harley rider to ride without a helmet, or 
the car driver to drive without a seatbelt. Society says that it has the right 
to force the use of the helmet or the seatbelt to prevent avoidable injuries. 
The arguments go back and forth like tug-of-war, but at the end of the day, 
when the Harley rider drops his bike on a pebble and he squashes his head, it 
won't be long before his insurance runs out, and society will be left holding 
the bag.

So, it would be great if we had a society where the individual could fend for 
himself and pay his own way from cradle to grave. But...what are we to do 
about the ones who fall through the cracks. Can we just ignore them? Shouldn't 
we as a society provide at least a modicum of health care for all? Should we 
have people starving in the 'richest' country in the world.

I feel that I'm about as patriotic a U.S. citizen as one can be. But...I've 
also worked right down the street from where you live Steve. I'm an emergency 
medicine doctor and I spent 10 years working at the old Helene Fuld Hospital 
right in Trenton, N. J., the capital of New Jersey. I also worked at the 
Atantic City Medical Center, located right across the street from the casinos 
in Atlantic City. I have been the 'safety net' of the United States, and not 
by choice. It is a role that shouldn't be. The only other places in the world 
where I have seen the poverty that we have in our inner cities was in some of 
the cities of India such as Mumbai, Kolkata, and New Delhi.

And, we could talk about personal security. There are many places in the 
States where one would probably not survive a walk down the street after 
midnight. I have walked the streets of major cities from London, Paris, 
Madrid, Barcelona, Cairo, Beijing, New Delhi, etc., and not felt particularly 
unsafe - even in the midst of abject poverty.

I guess my point is that we certainly have our own problems. We aren't doing a 
particularly good job of taking care of our own doorstep. We don't need to 
preach to any other county about how they keep their doorsteps clean. They 
might have some socialism in Sweden. Our system certainly isn't pure anything, 
and as someone pointed out has socialistic programs here and there. But, one 
way or the other, in Sweden I don't think you will find people who are 
starving and who do not have basic health care. You certainly can find them 
about fifteen minutes away from where you live Steve. This should not be 
happening in our country.

Derek

> not pure democracy, by definition. pure democracy is almost as bad as
> anarchy. you asked, I gave. disagree if you wish, but these are the accepted
> definitions.
> 
> Steve Spence
> Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
> & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
> http://www.green-trust.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 3:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] Bringing democracy to Sweden
> 
> 
> >
> > and none of them are democracies?
> >
> > Hakan
> >
> > At 02:47 PM 4/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> > >officially?
> > >
> > >Steve Spence
> > >Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
> > >& Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
> > >http://www.green-trust.org
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: 
> > >Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 2:21 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [biofuel] Bringing democracy to Sweden
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What is UK then? - constitutional monarchy
> > > > What is Canada then? - confederation with parliamentary democracy
> > > > What is Australia then? - democratic, federal-state system recognizing
> the
> > >British monarch as sovereign
> > > > What is Spain then? - parliamentary monarchy
> > > > What is Sweden then? - constitutional monarchy
> > > > What is France then? - republic
> > > > What is Germany then? - federal republic
> > > > What is Switzerland then? - federal republic
> > >
> > >and the USA - federal republic; strong democratic tradition
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am very interested in your definitions of above countries.
> > > >
> > > > Hakan
> > > >
> > > > At 02:00 PM 4/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> > > > >A democracy is mob rule. A republic is democracy with a constitution
> that
> > > > >specifies what limits the mob has. our 3 way system of government is
> set
> > >up
> > > > >with

Re: [biofuel] Bringing democracy to Sweden

2003-04-11 Thread desertstallion

The Swedes also have a much more homogeneous population. Many of the 
difficulties in the U.S. come from the 'melting pot.' However, it is also one 
of the U.S.s strengths. But, if you are constantly bringing on board people 
with few recourses and who are poorly educated, it takes a bit to get them 
caught up. These subpopulations in our inner cities, etc., will distort 
statistics on infant mortality, etc., as in the studies that Hakan quoted.

At the same time, I feel that the U.S. can and should do much better. I am 
from the States, but have spent a lot of time overseas. There is a lot that we 
could learn from Europe and elsewhere - and vice versa. I first went to live 
in Spain in 1978. I saw many things that I felt they could do better, but 
overall, I decided that the majority of what I was seeing was actually done 
better than what we did. We certainly shouldn't be cocky that we have all the 
answers.

I know of some Swedes who wish that their taxes weren't so high. But, then, 
they get a lot back from their taxes. I certainly wish that a higher 
percentage of our own U.S. taxes went to domestic programs rather than to 
military budgets.

Best to all,

Derek

Derek
> I would not consider a socialist country like Sweden to be superior to the
> USA. Swede's may not concur. Americans I know who have moved there, and
> Swedes that have moved here, both say that each has it's moments.
> 
> 
> Steve Spence
> Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
> & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
> http://www.green-trust.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] Bringing democracy to Sweden
> 
> 
> >
> > MH,
> >
> > I expected to hear from you, after reading the links
> > I gave you, especially if you looked at this document,
> >
> > http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2002/en/pdf/backone.pdf
> > Human developing index
> >
> > If you go through it, you will find that the "Swedish democracy"
> > is superior than the "American democracy" on some minor
> > issues as social security, human rights, children labor, corruption,
> > equality between sexes, education, wealth gap, etc. That is why
> > I think it is more difficult to impose "American democracy" in
> > Sweden than in Iraq, contrary to the US administration perception.
> > But who knows, military superiority can change most things and
> > we cannot have something that is better than the American can
> > we? I guess that Sweden must be liberated also.
> >
> > Hakan
> >
> > At 10:46 PM 4/10/2003 +0200, you wrote:
> >
> > >MH,
> > >
> > >http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2002/cpi2002.en.html
> > >Sorry, 2001 list the Netherlands was on shared 5 with Sweden,
> > >now it is Singapore.
> > >
> > >http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2002/en/pdf/backone.pdf
> > >Human developing index
> > >
> > >http://hdr.undp.org/reports/default.cfm
> > >Human development reports.
> > >
> > >Hakan
> > >
> > >
> > >At 02:49 PM 4/10/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > I had a moment filled with laugh and anger when I looked
> > > > > at an CNN interview with a high ranking US official. This
> > > > > enlightened idiot said "it is one thing to bring democracy
> > > > > to a country like Sweden, but more difficult to a country
> > > > > like Iraq". As democracy Sweden is known as one of the
> > > > > oldest and best in the world and is in the fifth place, together
> > > > > with the Netherlands, of least corrupted countries in the world.
> > > > > US is in 16th place, far closer to Nigeria who is the worst.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hakan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  Hey Hakan where do I found this ranking report ?
> > > >  Details, details more details please.  8^}
> > > >  Thank you!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> > >
> > >Biofuels list archives:
> > >http://archive.nnytech.net/
> > >
> > >Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > >To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >
> > Biofuels list archives:
> > http://archive.nnytech.net/
> >
> > Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --

RE: [biofuel] cold weather starting - No starting fluid!

2002-12-17 Thread desertstallion

Do you think the glow plugs have any role in this? As I said, I have seen
the use of starter fluid allowed, even encouraged by manufacturers of Diesel
engines that do not have glow plugs. Could this have a role in whether or
not someone should use starter fluid? It would seem to me that glow plugs
would make pre-ignition more likely.

Derek


-Original Message-
From: Bryan Fullerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 19:50
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] cold weather starting - No starting fluid!

Of Course the manuals say not to use ether along with other legal jargon and
this is exactly why they say not to use it. Because they can't regulate HOW
people use it. You think they want to have to do warranty work because
someone else screwed up? If you dont understand how ether/startingfluid
works you shouldn't be using it.
Had his engine been cranking faster 1 of 2 things different would have
happened:
1. More then likely his engine would have started without the use of the
ether. Cranking speed is critical in a diesel because the air is compressed
which creates heat. This Hot Dense air is suppose to fire the fuel but in a
cold engine it can quickly dissipate the heat to the cylinder walls, head,
and piston. You might not think so but this can happen incredibly fast. Go
ahead and experiment with a stirling cycle engine and you will see what I
mean. Its this property in fact that makes the stirling engine work.

2. Had it been cranking faster with a bit less starting fluid the rotating
mass would have carried over and at least some of the energy would have
propelled the engine in the right direction. I have seen diesels crank slow
enough that basically the cylinder was losing most of its heat(therefore
some of the pressure in the cylinder resisting the starter) before the
piston came TDC. A gas engine can do this and still start but a diesel
can't. Your chance of starting a slow cold cranking diesel is practically
nil. back in those days I didn't have an RPM guage so I cant really give
numbers but I would have to say as a rule of thumb, if you can hear the
engine hesitate, even a little bit, on each cylinder then your in trouble.

You can get by with crappy batteries in a gas car for some time if you dont
have any engine problems but not so in a diesel. Again this is just drawn
from my personal experiance of owning diesels and rebuilding and assisting
others with their diesels. I love hopping up diesel engines to double their
horsepower and what not. Diesels have even been used on the drag strip. Ever
see 600 some horsepower from an old 6.2? Some crazy guy did it but I dont
think you could call him pollution concious.

Bryan Fullerton
White Knight Gifts
www.youcandobusiness.com

- Original Message -
From: "desertstallion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:28 AM
Subject: RE: [biofuel] cold weather starting - No starting fluid!


> I have always read in the manuals of the Diesels that I have owned that
have
> glow plugs NOT to use ether (Volvo and Ford 6.9 NA). But, I understand,
for
> example, that the Diesels in the Mercedes Unimogs, that don't have glow
> plugs, allow the use of ether. In fact, there is a factory option to have
an
> automatic dispenser for cold weather starts. I think that the glow plugs
may
> be either damaged by the ether, or the glow plugs may cause early
detonation
> with resulting damage to the engine. Clearly the manuals state that use of
> ether can lead to catastrophic engine failure and strongly advise against
it
> and further will not cover the damage under warrantee.
>
> In the case of your starter it wasn't a faster rev that broke it; rather I
> bet you had a pre-ignition which tried to run your engine backwards. Since
> the starter was engaged, the teeth broke. The GM Diesels also have glow
> plugs and I understand that their manuals also state that ether is not to
be
> used.
>
> Derek




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] cold weather starting - No starting fluid!

2002-12-16 Thread desertstallion

I have always read in the manuals of the Diesels that I have owned that have
glow plugs NOT to use ether (Volvo and Ford 6.9 NA). But, I understand, for
example, that the Diesels in the Mercedes Unimogs, that don't have glow
plugs, allow the use of ether. In fact, there is a factory option to have an
automatic dispenser for cold weather starts. I think that the glow plugs may
be either damaged by the ether, or the glow plugs may cause early detonation
with resulting damage to the engine. Clearly the manuals state that use of
ether can lead to catastrophic engine failure and strongly advise against it
and further will not cover the damage under warrantee.

In the case of your starter it wasn't a faster rev that broke it; rather I
bet you had a pre-ignition which tried to run your engine backwards. Since
the starter was engaged, the teeth broke. The GM Diesels also have glow
plugs and I understand that their manuals also state that ether is not to be
used.

Derek


-Original Message-
From: martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 21:11
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] cold weather starting - No starting fluid!

You used too much.
I worked on a farm and we had to use ether all the time to get things 
running and I never broke anything. One time I sprayed too much in an 
engine and it revved really [way too] fast, but it didn't break 
anything. But these were large 500 ci IH in milk trucks, and smaller 
straight 6 tractors.
So I guess if you don't need it, don't use it of course.

harley3 wrote:

>Never use "starting fluid" in a diesel engine.  I tried starting fluid once
>in my 6.5 diesel G.M. Suburban.The engine spit the starter out onto the
>ground.My foolish mistake broke the starter, and torn out 5 teeth off
my
>torque converter.  A very expensive mistake, never again.
>
>Harley
>  
>


-- 
---
Martin Klingensmith
http://nnytech.net/
http://infoarchive.net/



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Diesel Sawmill

2002-12-15 Thread desertstallion

My personal opinion is that for most applications along these lines you
should get electric machinery and then run it from a biodiesel powered
generator. It is a lot more flexible. For example, I have been looking at
oil press machinery and at first thought I would want to power it directly
with a biodiesel fueled Diesel engine. The machinery directly driven with a
Diesel engine was a lot heavier, needed a much heavier foundation to damp
the vibrations, and was more cumbersome. I wanted to be able to move the
press fairly easily from site to site, but the Diesel direct drive required
a 'permanent' concrete foundation, whereas the electric drive unit only
required a steel frame foundation. There seems to me to be little downside
to powering an electric mill with a biodiesel fueled Diesel generator.

Derek


-Original Message-
From: Ben Falk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 17:21
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [biofuel] Diesel Sawmill

Hello, Does anyone have any advice on purchasing a small portable diesel
band sawmill?The only model I have found is the LT15 by Wood Mizer (which is
a bit out of our budget). Our school is interested in a 8-15hp band sawmill
that can run on biodiesel.  Simple, mostly manual mills are of particular
interest as we are remote from any service operations.  A used mill might be
fine. The wood is Casuarina, and at least as dense as shagbark hickory.
Thanks for any insight you may have! -Ben  Ben K. Falk
Design-Build Manager
The Island School
Cape Eleuthera, Bahamas
www.islandschool.org





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] Diesel engines vs. gasoline engines

2002-12-11 Thread desertstallion

Hi,

I guess you don't live in Europe. I just read in the local paper that over
50% of the automobiles sold to date in 2002 in Spain were Diesels. Also, due
to the life style generally seen in Europe, many of these are used for
relatively short runs. Some are actually designed as 'city cars.'

Many expect that they will get more total mileage out of a Diesel, not less
as the engines are generally heavier duty, built stronger to withstand the
higher compression ratios used by a Diesel engine.

In very broad terms, a gasoline (petrol) engine uses a spark to fire the
compressed fuel/air mixture. The Diesel engine uses higher compression
ratios, than those of the gasoline engine, to superheat compressed air. The
fuel is then sprayed into this hot air and it spontaneously ignites.
Otherwise they both are classed as internal combustion engines and basically
work the same. In my opinion there shouldn't be any significant difference
between them in wear. A Diesel does run cooler since they are more efficient
and they possibly take longer to get to operating temperature and therefore
maybe would have increased wear in short runs for this reason, but I don't
think one would ever see it in the real world. The Diesels in the VWs are
generally known to outlast the vehicles - for this reason they are fairly
easily available in junk yards for co-gen projects.

Regards,

Derek


-Original Message-
From: rucksackn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 02:12
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [biofuel] Diesel engines vs. gasoline engines

I live in  city of about 130,000 people. I'm looking at buying a 
diesel and using biodiesel for fuel. I have a question though 
about the praticalities of owning and using a diesel in an urban 
environment.

I wasrecently warned against buying a diesel engine-based 
vehicle if the vehicle's primary use is mainly short trips (i.e. in a 
city). The main reason given was that diesels are meant to be 
driven long distances (i.e highways). To drive a diesel in-town on 
short trips, is to basiclly have a vehicle that dies out sooner than 
a gasoline powered vehicle.  My question is whether accelerated 
deterioration would be linked to carbon build-up within typical 
diesels (my understanding is that biodiesel eliminates this 
build-up)

Does anyone know or can explain the differences between the 
two types of engines and tell me whether there is any merit to 
this caveat? Are there any other considerations needed to be 
kept in mind when thinking diesel within the urban framework?

Thanks



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Code

2002-07-28 Thread desertstallion

AFAIK:

IMHO = In My Honest/Humble Opinion
FWIW = For What It's Worth
OTOH = On The Other Hand
IMO = In My Opinion
LOL = Lots of Laughter/Laugh Out Loud
BS = Bull Shit
AFAIK = As For As I Know
ROTFLMAO = Roll On The Floor Laughing My Ass OFF
ROTFLMFAO = Roll On The Floor Laughing MY F**king Ass 
Off

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

Derek Hargis

By the way (BTW), I've been lurking on this list for 
quite a while and haven't spoken up much lately. But, 
some of you may remember when I contributed from Saudi 
Arabia. For the last year I have been living in 
Beijing. My family and I are pulling up stakes again 
and heading for Spain, the UK, India, and maybe 
Pakistan over the next two months. Then, we will settle 
again in Saudi Arabia.

This address will stay the same and I will continue to 
listen in to the great discussions. As I get a bit more 
settled I hope to contribute more in the future.

DWH

> Forgive my ignorance but could someone please complete the 
> following...
> IMHO  -
> FWIW  -
> OTOH  -
> IMO   -
> LOL   -
> BS-
> 
> TIA   (Thanks in advance) 
> James
> 
> 
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> 
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
> 
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/NsdPZD/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/FGYolB/TM
-~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/