Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Hakan Falk

Oil was first used for lamps and steam boilers. The diesel oil is
a by product of the refining process to get gasoline and was
used as for lamps, cleaning and heating. A cleaner version of
diesel is used for dry cleaning. I do not remember the amount
of different products that you get from crude, but you can find
it if you google. Short, No, Diesel did not invent the fuel, he was
actually looking for using coal dust. His interest or lack of it in
petroleum products was understandable.

Prohibition was only about drunkenness and wood alcohol can
be used if you filter it with active coal to remove harmful oils.
After prohibition there are many ways and rules to protect the
tax income from alcoholic drinks.

Gasoline as product, was developed for Ford T and as a cheaper
fuel to replace ethanol. Ethanol has always been an alternative
fuel, until they started to use rubber parts that was dissolved
by ethanol. Similar development with the diesel engine. I do
not know if the choice of rubber was intentional, to secure the
use of petroleum products, but it might have been.

Hakan

At 04:49 09/06/2006, you wrote:
Mike
The oil engine was in use long before Rudolf Diesel. Bit of chicken or egg.

Did Rudolf  invent the fuel?
He certainly reduced the size of the oil engine principal to enable it to
fit into land transport use from Sea and machine shop energy sources. I have
been unable to locate any part where he actually invented the mineral oil
known as Diesel oil. I can only find references to Peanut/vegetable oils in
his early engines.

Can anyone point me in the direction where he invented the Diesel oil?

Prohibition was to stop home making of fuel or to stop alcoholic drinks or
one was to cover the other? In history wood alcohol was included why?

Henry Ford was a ruthless marketing and business man. (Read some of Edzels
conflicts with his father before his early death). Fuel was sold in cans.
How do you sell cars to people well away from fuel sources? Make them able
to run on multi fuels, until Prohibition. The dates are about correct, late
model T and early model A, AA and AAA. Note the model AAA (Triple
A) was still run on ethanol as was not outlawed as far as my trips and
research shows.

The globe was already controlled by the oil industry. Sloan, the most
powerfull man at the time, could not perhaps change this or was in agreement
with the oil industry.

  *   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
peanut oil.
  * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on
ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
grown in the U.S.
  * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.
  * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global
Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
  * In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the
fields for a hundred years.
 
  Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
  http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
 
http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0-ax332x3239551;



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last for 
one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the diesel 
engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine. However, 
it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and 
possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel 
engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the 
discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to arise, 
because of the unique properties of petroleum.
Jan
- Original Message - 
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



Jan,

Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
protected in certain countries. Patents are only valid for 25 years
and the normal way is to patent modifications/enhancements to
the original patent to prolong the patent protection of the most
competitive product.

Diesel might have had the idea as student, but he had financing
for his development from the German coal industry. The contract
was to develop his engine to run on coal dust. That is why there
are always mentioning of coal dust, in conjunction with diesel.

Kerrosene was at the time and today, used for lamps and heating.
It is also a quality of kerrosene used for dry cleaning.

The quality of crude that are economical for gasoline, will end
before the crude suitable for fuel for diesel engine. If normal demand
principles are governing the situation, the price gap between
diesel and gasoline should widen in the future. It depends also
on the space heating demands, where heating oil (diesel) is
used for small buildings. Large buildings and Area centrals, use
heavy oil and it will last longer than diesel.

When we are talking of oil depletion, it is a very rough estimation.
Certain oil products like gasoline are depleting faster than the
generally used numbers. Oil products and their depletion is
a much more complex situation.

Hakan


At 08:34 09/06/2006, you wrote:
Yes, I am able to amswer some questions concerning Rudolf Diesel.
He had his idea to his engine when he was a student of the technical
academy. Once he had a ready prototype ( which was tested with several 
fuels
; gasoline, kerrosene and vegetable oils) he realized that he had to supply
the fuel with the machine. So as a result of an agreement with Atlas Copco
Diesel (member of the Wallenberg group) he had oil exploration rights in
Baku, near the Caspian Sea through an oil company with head office in St
Petersbrg Russia. This company was run by two relatives to Alfred Nobel, 
the
founder of the Nobel prize. The aim with this deal was to obtain large qtis
of kerrosene, which was the main petroleum product by that time. But then
the Russian revelution came in 1917 and his rights were expropiated. But 
the
time that he had at his disposal was enough to establish kerrosene as the
main diesel fuel. The manufacturing rights of the diesel engine is now 
owned
by Scania, which also is a member of the Wallenberg group.
The question for Rudolf Diesel was not the fuel itself, it was to have
access to diesel engine fuel, period.
We are now running out of oil, but some really good alternatives are coming
up in practice, don´t you think ?
Jan Warnqvist
- Original Message -
From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future


  Mike
  The oil engine was in use long before Rudolf Diesel. Bit of chicken or
  egg.
 
  Did Rudolf  invent the fuel?
  He certainly reduced the size of the oil engine principal to enable it 
  to
  fit into land transport use from Sea and machine shop energy sources. I
  have
  been unable to locate any part where he actually invented the mineral 
  oil
  known as Diesel oil. I can only find references to Peanut/vegetable oils
  in
  his early engines.
 
  Can anyone point me in the direction where he invented the Diesel oil?
 
  Prohibition was to stop home making of fuel or to stop alcoholic drinks 
  or
  one was to cover the other? In history wood alcohol was included why?
 
  Henry Ford was a ruthless marketing and business man. (Read some of 
  Edzels
  conflicts with his father before his early death). Fuel was sold in 
  cans.
  How do you sell cars to people well away from fuel sources? Make them 
  able
  to run on multi fuels, until Prohibition. The dates are about correct,
  late
  model T and early model A, AA and AAA. Note the model AAA
  (Triple
  A) was still run on ethanol as was not outlawed as far as my trips and
  research shows.
 
  The globe

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Jan Warnqvist
No I do not have a connection to Atlas Copco, but I know a little something 
about Rudolf Diesel.
Jan
- Original Message - 
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



Jan,

I did work with Atlas Copco as consultant in acoustics, when they developed
the silent compressors. At the time I was employed by Stellan Dahlstedt,
Akustik Konsult AB. It was very interesting insights in both diesel and
compressor technology.  The person in charge of their acoustic lab. was an
ex. employee in Akustik Konsult. I tell you this, because you obviously have
a connection to them. It was around 40 years ago and I moved out of Sweden
almost 30 years ago, to work full time with CAD/CAM and network products.

The final line of compressors became trend setters in the market and a large
success.

Håkan


At 11:06 09/06/2006, you wrote:
Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last for
one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the diesel
engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine. However,
it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and
possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel
engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the
discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to arise,
because of the unique properties of petroleum.
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



Jan,

Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
protected in certain countries. Patents are only valid for 25 years
and the normal way is to patent modifications/enhancements to
the original patent to prolong the patent protection of the most
competitive product.

Diesel might have had the idea as student, but he had financing
for his development from the German coal industry. The contract
was to develop his engine to run on coal dust. That is why there
are always mentioning of coal dust, in conjunction with diesel.

Kerrosene was at the time and today, used for lamps and heating.
It is also a quality of kerrosene used for dry cleaning.

The quality of crude that are economical for gasoline, will end
before the crude suitable for fuel for diesel engine. If normal demand
principles are governing the situation, the price gap between
diesel and gasoline should widen in the future. It depends also
on the space heating demands, where heating oil (diesel) is
used for small buildings. Large buildings and Area centrals, use
heavy oil and it will last longer than diesel.

When we are talking of oil depletion, it is a very rough estimation.
Certain oil products like gasoline are depleting faster than the
generally used numbers. Oil products and their depletion is
a much more complex situation.

Hakan


At 08:34 09/06/2006, you wrote:
 Yes, I am able to amswer some questions concerning Rudolf Diesel.
 He had his idea to his engine when he was a student of the technical
 academy. Once he had a ready prototype ( which was tested with several
 fuels
 ; gasoline, kerrosene and vegetable oils) he realized that he had to 
 supply
 the fuel with the machine. So as a result of an agreement with Atlas 
 Copco
 Diesel (member of the Wallenberg group) he had oil exploration rights in
 Baku, near the Caspian Sea through an oil company with head office in St
 Petersbrg Russia. This company was run by two relatives to Alfred Nobel,
 the
 founder of the Nobel prize. The aim with this deal was to obtain large 
 qtis
 of kerrosene, which was the main petroleum product by that time. But then
 the Russian revelution came in 1917 and his rights were expropiated. But
 the
 time that he had at his disposal was enough to establish kerrosene as the
 main diesel fuel. The manufacturing rights of the diesel engine is now
 owned
 by Scania, which also is a member of the Wallenberg group.
 The question for Rudolf Diesel was not the fuel itself, it was to have
 access to diesel engine fuel, period.
 We are now running out of oil, but some really good alternatives are 
 coming
 up in practice, don´t you think ?
 Jan Warnqvist
 - Original Message -
 From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 4:49 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future
 
 
   Mike
   The oil engine was in use long before Rudolf Diesel. Bit of chicken or
   egg.
  
   Did Rudolf  invent the fuel?
   He certainly reduced the size of the oil engine principal to enable it
   to
   fit into land

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread lres1
Jan,
Thank you for the earlier reply.

I don't suppose you would know if the following is correct or not.

Australia had the maximum grant to any inventor set at AUD10,000. This was
the maximum grant to enable development of an inventors idea.

From memory the Swedes had a department that would analyse an idea and if
seen to be possible then that department could be asked to assist the
inventor to a much greater degree than the AUD10,000. This could be why the
cassette was held by such interest and other every day consumable as well as
technologically based items. Not much in the way of books, and only slow
online here. Can you remember the late 60's and 70's when this system was
meant to have been operating in Sweden?

Doug.

 Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last for
 one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the diesel
 engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine.
However,
 it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and
 possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel
 engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the
 discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to
arise,
 because of the unique properties of petroleum.
 Jan
 - Original Message - 
 From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



 Jan,

 Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
 owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
 last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
 original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
 manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
 protected in certain countries. Patents are only valid for 25 years
 and the normal way is to patent modifications/enhancements to
 the original patent to prolong the patent protection of the most
 competitive product.

 Diesel might have had the idea as student, but he had financing
 for his development from the German coal industry. The contract
 was to develop his engine to run on coal dust. That is why there
 are always mentioning of coal dust, in conjunction with diesel.

 Kerrosene was at the time and today, used for lamps and heating.
 It is also a quality of kerrosene used for dry cleaning.

 The quality of crude that are economical for gasoline, will end
 before the crude suitable for fuel for diesel engine. If normal demand
 principles are governing the situation, the price gap between
 diesel and gasoline should widen in the future. It depends also
 on the space heating demands, where heating oil (diesel) is
 used for small buildings. Large buildings and Area centrals, use
 heavy oil and it will last longer than diesel.

 When we are talking of oil depletion, it is a very rough estimation.
 Certain oil products like gasoline are depleting faster than the
 generally used numbers. Oil products and their depletion is
 a much more complex situation.

 Hakan


 At 08:34 09/06/2006, you wrote:
 Yes, I am able to amswer some questions concerning Rudolf Diesel.
 He had his idea to his engine when he was a student of the technical
 academy. Once he had a ready prototype ( which was tested with several
 fuels
 ; gasoline, kerrosene and vegetable oils) he realized that he had to
supply
 the fuel with the machine. So as a result of an agreement with Atlas
Copco
 Diesel (member of the Wallenberg group) he had oil exploration rights in
 Baku, near the Caspian Sea through an oil company with head office in St
 Petersbrg Russia. This company was run by two relatives to Alfred Nobel,
 the
 founder of the Nobel prize. The aim with this deal was to obtain large
qtis
 of kerrosene, which was the main petroleum product by that time. But then
 the Russian revelution came in 1917 and his rights were expropiated. But
 the
 time that he had at his disposal was enough to establish kerrosene as the
 main diesel fuel. The manufacturing rights of the diesel engine is now
 owned
 by Scania, which also is a member of the Wallenberg group.
 The question for Rudolf Diesel was not the fuel itself, it was to have
 access to diesel engine fuel, period.
 We are now running out of oil, but some really good alternatives are
coming
 up in practice, don´t you think ?
 Jan Warnqvist
 - Original Message -
 From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 4:49 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future
 
 
   Mike
   The oil engine was in use long before Rudolf Diesel. Bit of chicken or
   egg.
  
   Did Rudolf  invent the fuel?
   He certainly reduced the size of the oil engine principal to enable it
   to
   fit into land transport use from Sea and machine shop energy sources.
I
   have
   been unable to locate any part where he actually invented the mineral
   oil
   known as Diesel oil

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Before Sweden´s entry into the EC, the system was built upon shared risks. 
It could be  very difficult to have grants from the official funds. The 
first condition was almost always that your bank should be involved. Then 
maybe, you could have some grants - anways smaller than 50% of the project 
budget- from at least two of the official funds. This system was working out 
of incompetence and cowardness. The projects were always analyzed by the 
funds, but the general assumption was that the bank should contribute. And 
the banks are never interested in evaluating projects, they are interested 
in securities for their loans. So, this basically meant, that if your 
security was not good enough, nobody else would contribute either. There 
were exceptions though. The boards of the funds realized that they had the 
power to guide the development according to their own desires by giving 
grants to projects that would serve the temporary (political or 
administrative) wishes .How much lasting and pay-backing things that were 
created from this system, I think nobody knows.
Jan
- Original Message - 
From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future


Jan,
Thank you for the earlier reply.

I don't suppose you would know if the following is correct or not.

Australia had the maximum grant to any inventor set at AUD10,000. This was
the maximum grant to enable development of an inventors idea.

From memory the Swedes had a department that would analyse an idea and if
seen to be possible then that department could be asked to assist the
inventor to a much greater degree than the AUD10,000. This could be why the
cassette was held by such interest and other every day consumable as well as
technologically based items. Not much in the way of books, and only slow
online here. Can you remember the late 60's and 70's when this system was
meant to have been operating in Sweden?

Doug.

 Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last for
 one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the diesel
 engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine.
However,
 it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and
 possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel
 engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the
 discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to
arise,
 because of the unique properties of petroleum.
 Jan
 - Original Message - 
 From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



 Jan,

 Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
 owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
 last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
 original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
 manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
 protected in certain countries. Patents are only valid for 25 years
 and the normal way is to patent modifications/enhancements to
 the original patent to prolong the patent protection of the most
 competitive product.

 Diesel might have had the idea as student, but he had financing
 for his development from the German coal industry. The contract
 was to develop his engine to run on coal dust. That is why there
 are always mentioning of coal dust, in conjunction with diesel.

 Kerrosene was at the time and today, used for lamps and heating.
 It is also a quality of kerrosene used for dry cleaning.

 The quality of crude that are economical for gasoline, will end
 before the crude suitable for fuel for diesel engine. If normal demand
 principles are governing the situation, the price gap between
 diesel and gasoline should widen in the future. It depends also
 on the space heating demands, where heating oil (diesel) is
 used for small buildings. Large buildings and Area centrals, use
 heavy oil and it will last longer than diesel.

 When we are talking of oil depletion, it is a very rough estimation.
 Certain oil products like gasoline are depleting faster than the
 generally used numbers. Oil products and their depletion is
 a much more complex situation.

 Hakan


 At 08:34 09/06/2006, you wrote:
 Yes, I am able to amswer some questions concerning Rudolf Diesel.
 He had his idea to his engine when he was a student of the technical
 academy. Once he had a ready prototype ( which was tested with several
 fuels
 ; gasoline, kerrosene and vegetable oils) he realized that he had to
supply
 the fuel with the machine. So as a result of an agreement with Atlas
Copco
 Diesel (member of the Wallenberg group) he had oil exploration rights in
 Baku, near the Caspian Sea through an oil company with head office in St
 Petersbrg Russia. This company was run by two relatives to Alfred

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Hakan Falk

Jan,

You are right about the time before EC, I have personal experiences
from this. When we needed the help it was very difficult to get it and
we could not pursue it. Once when we were a proven success, they
asked us and was upset when we said that we did not need any help
from them. I must say that we had the same experiences from the
Dutch banks also, Sweden was not the only ones who supported
entrepreneurs. UK was the only country that had a good support
program for software innovation and development at that time, around
30 years ago.

Once when we were a proven success, they all cued up in offering
us necessary help. In the end we were very happy that none of them
were involved, including the venture capitalists.

Hakan

At 14:02 09/06/2006, you wrote:
Before Sweden´s entry into the EC, the system was built upon shared risks.
It could be  very difficult to have grants from the official funds. The
first condition was almost always that your bank should be involved. Then
maybe, you could have some grants - anways smaller than 50% of the project
budget- from at least two of the official funds. This system was working out
of incompetence and cowardness. The projects were always analyzed by the
funds, but the general assumption was that the bank should contribute. And
the banks are never interested in evaluating projects, they are interested
in securities for their loans. So, this basically meant, that if your
security was not good enough, nobody else would contribute either. There
were exceptions though. The boards of the funds realized that they had the
power to guide the development according to their own desires by giving
grants to projects that would serve the temporary (political or
administrative) wishes .How much lasting and pay-backing things that were
created from this system, I think nobody knows.
Jan
- Original Message -
From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future


Jan,
Thank you for the earlier reply.

I don't suppose you would know if the following is correct or not.

Australia had the maximum grant to any inventor set at AUD10,000. This was
the maximum grant to enable development of an inventors idea.

 From memory the Swedes had a department that would analyse an idea and if
seen to be possible then that department could be asked to assist the
inventor to a much greater degree than the AUD10,000. This could be why the
cassette was held by such interest and other every day consumable as well as
technologically based items. Not much in the way of books, and only slow
online here. Can you remember the late 60's and 70's when this system was
meant to have been operating in Sweden?

Doug.

  Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last for
  one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the diesel
  engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine.
However,
  it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and
  possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel
  engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the
  discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to
arise,
  because of the unique properties of petroleum.
  Jan
  - Original Message -
  From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future
 
 
 
  Jan,
 
  Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
  owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
  last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
  original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
  manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
  protected in certain countries. Patents are only valid for 25 years
  and the normal way is to patent modifications/enhancements to
  the original patent to prolong the patent protection of the most
  competitive product.
 
  Diesel might have had the idea as student, but he had financing
  for his development from the German coal industry. The contract
  was to develop his engine to run on coal dust. That is why there
  are always mentioning of coal dust, in conjunction with diesel.
 
  Kerrosene was at the time and today, used for lamps and heating.
  It is also a quality of kerrosene used for dry cleaning.
 
  The quality of crude that are economical for gasoline, will end
  before the crude suitable for fuel for diesel engine. If normal demand
  principles are governing the situation, the price gap between
  diesel and gasoline should widen in the future. It depends also
  on the space heating demands, where heating oil (diesel) is
  used for small buildings. Large buildings and Area centrals, use
  heavy oil and it will last longer than diesel.
 
  When we are talking of oil depletion, it is a very

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Håkan,
this is a terribly low performance for any nation which claims supporting 
entrepreneurs. And think of all the people busy  with not supporting what 
they are suppose to support!
What is the point of such a system and such a mentality ?
Jan
- Original Message - 
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



Jan,

You are right about the time before EC, I have personal experiences
from this. When we needed the help it was very difficult to get it and
we could not pursue it. Once when we were a proven success, they
asked us and was upset when we said that we did not need any help
from them. I must say that we had the same experiences from the
Dutch banks also, Sweden was not the only ones who supported
entrepreneurs. UK was the only country that had a good support
program for software innovation and development at that time, around
30 years ago.

Once when we were a proven success, they all cued up in offering
us necessary help. In the end we were very happy that none of them
were involved, including the venture capitalists.

Hakan

At 14:02 09/06/2006, you wrote:
Before Sweden´s entry into the EC, the system was built upon shared risks.
It could be  very difficult to have grants from the official funds. The
first condition was almost always that your bank should be involved. Then
maybe, you could have some grants - anways smaller than 50% of the project
budget- from at least two of the official funds. This system was working 
out
of incompetence and cowardness. The projects were always analyzed by the
funds, but the general assumption was that the bank should contribute. And
the banks are never interested in evaluating projects, they are interested
in securities for their loans. So, this basically meant, that if your
security was not good enough, nobody else would contribute either. There
were exceptions though. The boards of the funds realized that they had the
power to guide the development according to their own desires by giving
grants to projects that would serve the temporary (political or
administrative) wishes .How much lasting and pay-backing things that were
created from this system, I think nobody knows.
Jan
- Original Message -
From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future


Jan,
Thank you for the earlier reply.

I don't suppose you would know if the following is correct or not.

Australia had the maximum grant to any inventor set at AUD10,000. This was
the maximum grant to enable development of an inventors idea.

 From memory the Swedes had a department that would analyse an idea and if
seen to be possible then that department could be asked to assist the
inventor to a much greater degree than the AUD10,000. This could be why the
cassette was held by such interest and other every day consumable as well 
as
technologically based items. Not much in the way of books, and only slow
online here. Can you remember the late 60's and 70's when this system was
meant to have been operating in Sweden?

Doug.

  Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last 
  for
  one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the 
  diesel
  engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine.
However,
  it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and
  possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel
  engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the
  discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to
arise,
  because of the unique properties of petroleum.
  Jan
  - Original Message -
  From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future
 
 
 
  Jan,
 
  Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
  owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
  last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
  original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
  manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
  protected in certain countries. Patents are only valid for 25 years
  and the normal way is to patent modifications/enhancements to
  the original patent to prolong the patent protection of the most
  competitive product.
 
  Diesel might have had the idea as student, but he had financing
  for his development from the German coal industry. The contract
  was to develop his engine to run on coal dust. That is why there
  are always mentioning of coal dust, in conjunction with diesel.
 
  Kerrosene was at the time and today, used for lamps and heating.
  It is also a quality of kerrosene used for dry cleaning.
 
  The quality of crude that are economical for gasoline, will end

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Kirk McLoren
Once the intake is closed and the concentrated sun starts its work the system is a closed oneso oxidizer/fuel density is unchanged. All you see is increased cylinder pressure and hotter coal dust and air. - less the motion of the piston during this time. I envision this engine as very slow moving, 100RPM or less. Maybe as slow as some of Ericsons machines.KirkMichael Redler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Kirk,It's a very novel approach but, with all due respect, I thinkthe thermodynamics of this process needs a closer look.The origins of all mechanical energy can (eventually) be traced back to temperature changes. So, your intentions are in the right place.Thermal expansion as part of a cycle of combustionisa
 function of how low the mass of fuel and air is in comparison to the temperature during combustion. This not only causes a greater delta T by simple temperature comparison but, it also effects fuel density as explained by the ideal gas equation, PV=nRT.I haven't taken a thermo class in about fourteen years so,this observation could be refined. I'm going by memory here.MikeKirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Because it will absorb solar radiation.  and since there is a suspension transfer to the air will be rapid.  This all happens BEFORE ignition. Then oxidation does the final rise in temperature. Much higher delta T with same investment in O2 and hydrocarbon. And the hydrocarbon is nearignition point so
 unburned is not as much of a problem. If tapioca was black and finely divided that would be ok too. Assuming it was water free. Sugar has a lot of water too. - and it isnt the best solar absorber.I always managed to take milk for my coffee. That powdered crap isnt fit for pigs. In a pinch take canned milk.KirkJoe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Why pray tell COAL dust then? Many dusts are combustible. How about tapioca? How about icing sugar? Ever throw coffeemate into your campfire? (stand well back if you try thisunless it is part of a ritual dance of course)lolJoeKirk McLoren wrote: Actually a solar/coaldust hybrid could have potential. Putting solar  heat into air is difficult to do speedily and coal
 dust could be finely  dispersed. The bottom end could be solar. Certainly save on emissions  and help achieve complete combustion.A cylinder with a quartz window.  Kirk [snip]___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Hakan Falk

Jan,

For us it turned out very good anyway. We sold 
for value comparable to 500 Million $ in todays 
money, shared by founders and key staff. A nice 
and good transaction for everybody. Some of the 
partners went on and formed a company called 
Small World (facility management software) and 
sold it in a very good deal to GE, who was a 
major client, a couple of years ago. Also an 
example of good balance between founders and 
staff interest, all cashed in on hard work and 
innovation, with the same model that I introduced for the first adventure.

Hakan

At 15:27 09/06/2006, you wrote:
Håkan,
this is a terribly low performance for any nation which claims supporting
entrepreneurs. And think of all the people busy  with not supporting what
they are suppose to support!
What is the point of such a system and such a mentality ?
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future



Jan,

You are right about the time before EC, I have personal experiences
from this. When we needed the help it was very difficult to get it and
we could not pursue it. Once when we were a proven success, they
asked us and was upset when we said that we did not need any help
from them. I must say that we had the same experiences from the
Dutch banks also, Sweden was not the only ones who supported
entrepreneurs. UK was the only country that had a good support
program for software innovation and development at that time, around
30 years ago.

Once when we were a proven success, they all cued up in offering
us necessary help. In the end we were very happy that none of them
were involved, including the venture capitalists.

Hakan

At 14:02 09/06/2006, you wrote:
 Before Sweden´s entry into the EC, the system was built upon shared risks.
 It could be  very difficult to have grants from the official funds. The
 first condition was almost always that your bank should be involved. Then
 maybe, you could have some grants - anways smaller than 50% of the project
 budget- from at least two of the official funds. This system was working
 out
 of incompetence and cowardness. The projects were always analyzed by the
 funds, but the general assumption was that the bank should contribute. And
 the banks are never interested in evaluating projects, they are interested
 in securities for their loans. So, this basically meant, that if your
 security was not good enough, nobody else would contribute either. There
 were exceptions though. The boards of the funds realized that they had the
 power to guide the development according to their own desires by giving
 grants to projects that would serve the temporary (political or
 administrative) wishes .How much lasting and pay-backing things that were
 created from this system, I think nobody knows.
 Jan
 - Original Message -
 From: lres1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:45 PM
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future
 
 
 Jan,
 Thank you for the earlier reply.
 
 I don't suppose you would know if the following is correct or not.
 
 Australia had the maximum grant to any inventor set at AUD10,000. This was
 the maximum grant to enable development of an inventors idea.
 
  From memory the Swedes had a department that would analyse an idea and if
 seen to be possible then that department could be asked to assist the
 inventor to a much greater degree than the AUD10,000. This could be why the
 cassette was held by such interest and other every day consumable as well
 as
 technologically based items. Not much in the way of books, and only slow
 online here. Can you remember the late 60's and 70's when this system was
 meant to have been operating in Sweden?
 
 Doug.
 
   Håkan, it is obvious that no patent or manufacturing lisence will last
   for
   one houndrad years, espcecially considering the development of the
   diesel
   engine. But Scania is the inheritar of the original diesel engine.
 However,
   it is not flattering for us Swedes to be so historically involved and
   possibly even having promoted the petroleum substitute for the diesel
   engine. Particulary not, since there is a common imagnination that the
   discovery of petroleum made it possible for the combustion engine to
 arise,
   because of the unique properties of petroleum.
   Jan
   - Original Message -
   From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
   Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:37 AM
   Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future
  
  
  
   Jan,
  
   Manufacturing rights as a whole to the diesel engine cannot be
   owned by Scania, only certain modifications that are done the
   last 25 years. It is no legal way, that I know of, to protect the
   original diesel engine for 100 years. The only legal way to protect
   manufacturing rights, is through patents and even they are not
   protected in certain

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-09 Thread Mike Redler




Ah...I see.

You wrote: "Once the intake is closed and the concentrated sun starts
its work ** the
system is a closed one ** so oxidizer/fuel density is unchanged."

That makes a lot more sense.

Mike


Kirk McLoren wrote:

  Once the intake is closed and the concentrated sun starts its
work the system is a closed oneso oxidizer/fuel density is unchanged.
All you see is increased cylinder pressure and hotter coal dust and
air. - less the motion of the piston during this time. I envision this
engine as very slow moving, 100RPM or less. Maybe as slow as some of
Ericsons machines.
  
  Kirk
  
  Michael Redler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Kirk,

It's a very novel approach but, with all due respect, I
thinkthe thermodynamics of this process needs a closer look.

The origins of all mechanical energy can (eventually) be
traced back to temperature changes. So, your intentions are in the
right place.Thermal expansion as part of a cycle of combustionisa
function of how low the mass of fuel and air is in comparison to the
temperature during combustion. This not only causes a greater delta T
by simple temperature comparison but, it also effects fuel density as
explained by the ideal gas equation, PV=nRT.

I haven't taken a thermo class in about fourteen years
so,this observation could be refined. I'm going by memory here.

Mike

Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Because it will absorb solar radiation.
  and since there is a suspension transfer to the air will be
rapid.
  This all happens BEFORE ignition. Then oxidation does the
final rise in temperature. Much higher delta T with same investment in
O2 and hydrocarbon. And the hydrocarbon is nearignition point so
unburned is not as much of a problem. If tapioca was black and finely
divided that would be ok too. Assuming it was water free. Sugar has a
lot of water too. - and it isnt the best solar absorber.
  
  I always managed to take milk for my coffee. That powdered
crap isnt fit for pigs. In a pinch take canned milk.
  
  Kirk
  
  Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  Why
pray tell COAL dust then? Many dusts are combustible. How about 
tapioca? How about icing sugar? Ever throw coffeemate into your 
campfire? (stand well back if you try thisunless it is part of a 
ritual dance of course)

lol

Joe

Kirk McLoren wrote:

 Actually a solar/coaldust hybrid could have potential. Putting
solar 
 heat into air is difficult to do speedily and coal dust could be
finely 
 dispersed. The bottom end could be solar. Certainly save on
emissions 
 and help achieve complete combustion.A cylinder with a quartz
window.
 
 Kirk
 
[snip]

_




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread John Beale
Silly Diesel and Ford. Everyone knows cars can't run on ethanol. That's  
why we, as humans, travel thousands of miles and invest billions of  
dollars in drilling rigs, pipelines, refineries, supertankers, and oil  
wars.

What were they thinking? Fuel from plants? That's preposterous! What  
have plants ever done for us? Last time I ran into some sumac, I had a  
terrible rash for weeks!

Everyone knows global warming is a big fraud invented by a joint effort  
between Greenpeace and the Democratic party to scare children away from  
playing hooky from school in the winter months to make snowmen. Just  
like love is a big fraud invented by Hallmark and Disney in an effort  
to increase revenues!

They must have been smoking that hemp and/or drinking its distillate.
-John



On Jun 8, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Mike Weaver wrote:

 *   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it  
 to
   run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the  
 diesel
   engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran  
 on
   peanut oil.
 * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run  
 on
   ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
   Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
   grown in the U.S.
 * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
   Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
   favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol  
 option.
 * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East,  
 Global
   Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
   finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
   of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
 * In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
   The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
   sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
   anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
   be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
   acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate  
 the
   fields for a hundred years.

 Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
 http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
 http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0- 
 ax332x3239551


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
 biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000  
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future redux

2006-06-08 Thread Hakan Falk

Mike W,

You are right!!!  I did not realize that the plastic surgery 
advanced to this level, or is it a brain transplant?

Hakan

At 14:22 08/06/2006, you wrote:
Is Bush really Dan Quayle?


Why wouldn't an enhanced deterrent, a more stable peace, a better
prospect to denying the ones who enter conflict in the first place to
have a reduction of offensive systems and an introduction to defensive
capability. I believe that is the route this country will eventually go.
--V.P. D.Q.

Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and
child. --V.P. D.Q.

Mars is essentially in the same orbit... somewhat the same distance from
the Sun, which is very important. We have seen pictures where there are
canals, we believe, and water. If there is water, that means there is
oxygen. If oxygen, that means we can breathe. --V.P. D.Q.

Hawaii has always been a very pivotal role in the Pacific. It is *in*
the Pacific. It is a part of the United States that is an island that is
right here. --V.P. D.Q., Hawaii, September 1989

What a terrible thing to have lost one's mind. Or not to have a mind at
all. How true that is. --V.P. D.Q. winning friends while speaking to the
United Negro College Fund

You all look like happy campers to me. Happy campers you are, happy
campers you have been, and, as far as I am concerned, happy campers you
will always be. --V.P. D.Q., to the American Samoans, whose capital
Quayle pronounces Pogo Pogo.

Quayle stumbled in response to a question about his opinion of the
Holocaust. He said it was an obscene period in our nation's history.
Then, trying to clarify his remark, Quayle said he meant this century's
history and added a confusing comment. We all lived in this century, I
didn't live in this century, he said. --V.P. D.Q.

We expect them [Salvadoran officials] to work toward the elimination of
human rights. --V.P. D.Q.

El Salvador is a democracy so it's not surprising that there are many
voices to be heard here. Yet in my conversations with Salvadorans... I
have heard a single voice. --V.P. D.Q.

I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and
democracy--but that could change. --V.P. D.Q.

One word sums up probably the responsibility of any vice president, and
that one word is to be prepared. --V.P. D.Q.

If we do not succeed, then we run the risk of failure. --V.P. D.Q., to
the Phoenix Republican Forum, March 1990

It's rural America. It's where I came from. We always refer to ourselves
as real America. Rural America, real America, real, real, America.
--V.P. D.Q.

Target prices? How that works? I know quite a bit about farm policy. I
come from Indiana, which is a farm state. Deficiency payments - which
are the key--that is what gets money into the farmer's hands. We got
loan, uh, rates, we got target, uh, prices, uh, I have worked very
closely with my senior colleague, (Indiana Sen.) Richard Lugar, making
sure that the farmers of Indiana are taken care of. --V.P. D.Q. on being
asked to define the term target prices. Quayle's press secretary then
cut short the press conference, after two minutes and 30 seconds.

I not going to focus on what I have done in the past what I stand for,
what I articulate to the American people. The American people will judge
me on what I am saying and what I have done in the last 12 years in the
Congress. --V.P. D.Q.

I want to be Robin to Bush's Batman. --V.P. D.Q.

We should develop anti-satellite weapons because we could not have
prevailed without them in Red Storm Rising. --V.P. D.Q.

The US has a vital interest in that area of the country. --V.P. D.Q.
Referring to Latin America.

Japan is an important ally of ours. Japan and the United States of the
Western industrialized capacity, 60 percent of the GNP, two countries.
That's a statement in and of itself. --V.P. D.Q.

May our nation continue to be the beakon of hope to the world. --The
Quayle's 1989 Christmas card. [Not a beacon of literacy, though.]

Well, it looks as if the top part fell on the bottom part. --V.P. D.Q.
referring to the collapsed section of the 880 freeway after the San
Francisco earthquake of 1989. [this may be a joke; the source is
unclear, but it's still funny]

...getting [cruise missiles] more accurate so that we can have precise
precision. --V.P. D.Q. referring to his legislative work dealing with
cruise missiles

I can identify with steelworkers. I can identify with workers that have
had a difficult time. --V.P. D.Q. addressing workers at an Ohio steel
plant,1988

[I will never have] another Jimmy Carter grain embargo, Jimmy, Jimmy
Carter, Jimmy Carter grain embargo, Jimmy Carter grain embargo. --V.P.
D.Q. during the Bentson debate

Certainly, I know what to do, and when I am Vice President--and I will
be--there will be contingency plans under different sets of situations
and I tell you what, I'm not going to go out and hold a news conference
about it. I'm going to put it in a safe and keep it there! Does that
answer your question? --V.P. D.Q. 

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Kirk McLoren
In the early days when the Standard had competition from alcohol it was alleged the reason railroad tank cars arrrived without their cargo was John's boys had sabotaged them. Of course that couldn't be true - could it?Also if you have access to a Mark's Handbook printed prior to WWIII look up Frank Shumann and C.V. Boys - http://www.solarmillennium.de/pdf/PiStaRep.pdf  see 4.1 - document is a 3 megabyte pdf  will tell you a bit about it. Marks Handbook for mechanical engineers had 3 pages with sketches. Newer books do not mention it.Kirk  John Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Silly Diesel and Ford. Everyone knows cars can't run on ethanol. That's why we, as humans, travel
 thousands of miles and invest billions of dollars in drilling rigs, pipelines, refineries, supertankers, and oil wars.What were they thinking? Fuel from plants? That's preposterous! What have plants ever done for us? Last time I ran into some sumac, I had a terrible rash for weeks!Everyone knows global warming is a big fraud invented by a joint effort between Greenpeace and the Democratic party to scare children away from playing hooky from school in the winter months to make snowmen. Just like love is a big fraud invented by Hallmark and Disney in an effort to increase revenues!They must have been smoking that hemp and/or drinking its distillate.-JohnOn Jun 8, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Mike Weaver wrote: * Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it  to run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the  diesel engine was first
 introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran  on peanut oil. * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run  on ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops grown in the U.S. * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol  option. * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East,  Global Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines of Diesel and Ford's original ideas. * In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said: "The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like
 that sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate  the fields for a hundred years." Whose water is it? *Learn more:* http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm  ax332x3239551 ___ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/  biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Street
Ahh here it is:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg62146.html

J

Mike Weaver wrote:

 *   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
   run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
   engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
   peanut oil.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Street
Didn't Keith debunk that myth here just recently?

Well this isn't the message I remember but it says basically the same 
thing...

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg60497.html

Joe

Mike Weaver wrote:

 *   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
   run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
   engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
   peanut oil.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Keith Addison
*   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
  run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
  engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
  peanut oil.

Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!

Facts:

1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.

1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both Paris 
World Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.

But no peanut oil. The true story:

... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published 1912 
and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company that ran one 
of his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French government 
during the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where he 
determined fuel consumption and assessed operability. He also 
mentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg using 
castor oil and animal oils. - Darren Hill

It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book The Development of the 
Diesel Engine -afaik the last one he published until he drowned 
himself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested are 
described there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that had 
been sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil and 
even tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it was 
the French Otto-Company (yes the Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel's 
engine on peanut oil: The engine was built for crude oil and was 
used without any modification on vegoilit worked so well that 
only a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance. 
(Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors 1st reprint 
by Braun, Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.). - 
Stephan Helbig

Best

Keith


* Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on
  ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
  Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
  grown in the U.S.
* Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
  Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
  favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.
* Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global
  Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
  finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
  of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
* In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
  The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
  sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
  anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
  be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
  acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the
  fields for a hundred years.

Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0-ax332x3239551;



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Hakan Falk

Keith,

Coal dust is the key, because it was the coal industry who paid for
the development of the diesel engine. Observing that coal dust is
almost explosive, they had they idea that it could be sold and used
for an engine, instead of piling up as useless trash mountains.

Diesel did not successfully manage to develop the coal dust engine,
but instead it was running on almost anything else.

Hakan

At 16:14 08/06/2006, you wrote:
 *   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
   run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
   engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
   peanut oil.

Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!

Facts:

1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.

1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both Paris
World Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.

But no peanut oil. The true story:

... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published 1912
and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company that ran one
of his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French government
during the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where he
determined fuel consumption and assessed operability. He also
mentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg using
castor oil and animal oils. - Darren Hill

It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book The Development of the
Diesel Engine -afaik the last one he published until he drowned
himself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested are
described there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that had
been sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil and
even tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it was
the French Otto-Company (yes the Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel's
engine on peanut oil: The engine was built for crude oil and was
used without any modification on vegoilit worked so well that
only a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance.
(Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors 1st reprint
by Braun, Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.). -
Stephan Helbig

Best

Keith


 * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on
   ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
   Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
   grown in the U.S.
 * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
   Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
   favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.
 * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global
   Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
   finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
   of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
 * In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
   The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
   sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
   anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
   be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
   acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the
   fields for a hundred years.
 
 Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
 http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
 http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0-ax332 
 x3239551



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Appal Energy
Actually, Diesel was contracted by the German navy to create an engine 
that ran on coal dust. In the process there were several explosive 
failures resulting in deaths.

The presumption is made that Diesel used vegetable oils to reduce the 
explosive properties of coal dust. Eventually, and again presumabley, 
the ratio of oil to dust became high enough and the benefits noticeable 
enough that Diesel began testing slurries and in time pure plant oil.

Todd Swearingen


Mike Weaver wrote:

*   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
  run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
  engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
  peanut oil.
* Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on
  ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
  Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
  grown in the U.S.
* Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
  Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
  favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.
* Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global
  Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
  finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
  of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
* In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
  The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
  sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
  anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
  be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
  acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the
  fields for a hundred years.

Whose water is it? *Learn more:* 
http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm 
http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0-ax332x3239551; 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Kirk McLoren
Actually a solar/coaldust hybrid could have potential. Putting solar heat into air is difficult to do speedily and coal dust could be finely dispersed. The bottom end could be solar. Certainly save on emissions and help achieve complete combustion.A cylinder with a quartz window.KirkHakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Keith,Coal dust is the key, because it was the coal industry who paid forthe development of the diesel engine. Observing that coal dust isalmost explosive, they had they idea that it could be sold and usedfor an engine, instead of piling up as useless trash mountains.Diesel did not successfully manage to develop the coal dust engine,but instead it was running on almost anything else.HakanAt 16:14 08/06/2006, you wrote:
  * Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to  run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel  engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on  peanut oil.Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!Facts:1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both ParisWorld Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.But no peanut oil. The true story:"... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published 1912and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company that ran oneof his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French governmentduring the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where hedetermined fuel consumption and assessed
 operability. He alsomentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg usingcastor oil and animal oils." - Darren Hill"It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book "The Development of theDiesel Engine" -afaik the last one he published until he drownedhimself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested aredescribed there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that hadbeen sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil andeven tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it wasthe French "Otto-Company" (yes the Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel'sengine on peanut oil: "The engine was built for crude oil and wasused without any modification on vegoil."..."it worked so well thatonly a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance."(Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors" 1st reprintby Braun,
 Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.)." -Stephan HelbigBestKeith  * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on  ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced  Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops  grown in the U.S.  * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in  Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws  favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.  * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global  Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is  finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines  of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.  * In an interview with the New York Times in
 1925, Henry Ford said:  "The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that  sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost  anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can  be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an  acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the  fields for a hundred years."  Whose water is it? *Learn more:* http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm  x3239551___Biofuel mailing listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the combined
 Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Street
Why pray tell COAL dust then? Many dusts are combustible.  How about 
tapioca? How about icing sugar?  Ever throw coffeemate into your 
campfire? (stand well back if you try thisunless it is part of a 
ritual dance of course)

lol

Joe

Kirk McLoren wrote:

 Actually a solar/coaldust hybrid could have potential. Putting solar 
 heat into air is difficult to do speedily and coal dust could be finely 
 dispersed. The bottom end could be solar. Certainly save on emissions 
 and help achieve complete combustion.A cylinder with a quartz window.
  
 Kirk
 
 */Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
 
 
 Keith,
 
 Coal dust is the key, because it was the coal industry who paid for
 the development of the diesel engine. Observing that coal dust is
 almost explosive, they had they idea that it could be sold and used
 for an engine, instead of piling up as useless trash mountains.
 
 Diesel did not successfully manage to develop the coal dust engine,
 but instead it was running on almost anything else.
 
 Hakan
 
 At 16:14 08/06/2006, you wrote:
* Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
peanut oil.
  
  Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!
  
  Facts:
  
  1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.
  
  1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both Paris
  World Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.
  
  But no peanut oil. The true story:
  
  ... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published 1912
  and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company that ran one
  of his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French government
  during the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where he
  determined fuel consumption and assessed operability. He also
  mentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg using
  castor oil and animal oils. - Darren Hill
  
  It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book The Development of the
  Diesel Engine -afaik the last one he published until he drowned
  himself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested are
  described there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that had
  been sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil and
  even tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it was
  the French Otto-Company (yes the Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel's
  engine on peanut oil: The engine was built for crude oil and was
  used without any modification on vegoilit worked so well that
  only a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance.
  (Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors 1st reprint
  by Braun, Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.). -
  Stephan Helbig
  
  Best
  
  Keith
  
  
* Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to
 run on
ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
grown in the U.S.
* Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.
* Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East,
 Global
Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
* In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the
fields for a hundred years.
   
   Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
   http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
   
   x3239551
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of 

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Kirk McLoren
Because it will absorb solar radiation.  and since there is a suspension transfer to the air will be rapid.  This all happens BEFORE ignition. Then oxidation does the final rise in temperature. Much higher delta T with same investment in O2 and hydrocarbon. And the hydrocarbon is nearignition point so unburned is not as much of a problem. If tapioca was black and finely divided that would be ok too. Assuming it was water free. Sugar has a lot of water too. - and it isnt the best solar absorber.I always managed to take milk for my coffee. That powdered crap isnt fit for pigs. In a pinch take canned milk.KirkJoe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Why pray tell COAL dust then? Many dusts are combustible. How about tapioca? How about
 icing sugar? Ever throw coffeemate into your campfire? (stand well back if you try thisunless it is part of a ritual dance of course)lolJoeKirk McLoren wrote: Actually a solar/coaldust hybrid could have potential. Putting solar  heat into air is difficult to do speedily and coal dust could be finely  dispersed. The bottom end could be solar. Certainly save on emissions  and help achieve complete combustion.A cylinder with a quartz window.  Kirk  */Hakan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:   Keith,  Coal dust is the key, because it was the coal industry who paid for the development of the diesel engine. Observing that coal dust is almost explosive, they had they idea that it could be sold and used for an engine, instead of piling up as useless trash mountains.  Diesel did not
 successfully manage to develop the coal dust engine, but instead it was running on almost anything else.  Hakan  At 16:14 08/06/2006, you wrote:   * Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to   run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel   engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on   peanut oil.  Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!  Facts:  1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.  1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both Paris World Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.  But no peanut oil. The true story:  "... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published
 1912 and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company that ran one of his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French government during the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where he determined fuel consumption and assessed operability. He also mentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg using castor oil and animal oils." - Darren Hill  "It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book "The Development of the Diesel Engine" -afaik the last one he published until he drowned himself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested are described there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that had been sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil and even tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it was the French "Otto-Company" (yes the
 Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel's engine on peanut oil: "The engine was built for crude oil and was used without any modification on vegoil."..."it worked so well that only a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance." (Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors" 1st reprint by Braun, Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.)." - Stephan Helbig  Best  Keith * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on   ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced   Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops   grown in the U.S.   * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in   Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers
 to create laws   favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.   * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global   Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is   finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines   of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.   * In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:   "The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that   sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost   anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can   be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an   acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the   fields for a hundred years." 
   Whose water is it? *Learn more:*  http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfmx3239551___ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives 

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future - THE TRUTH

2006-06-08 Thread Mike Weaver
Uh, Keith, hate to burst your bubble, but it is well-established that 
Rudolph Diesel designed his
engine primarily to atomize hemp oil, in order to reap its 
psychopharmacological benefits.  It was really just a big metal bong.
The production of rotational torque was a side effect, and neccessary to 
keep the law enforcement people off his back.  It was
somewhat later, at a diesel party, that an attendee (the Cheech Marin 
of his day) said 23 skidoo, man, we should put this device into a
horseless carriage and drive around, then everyone could share the 
effects.  This they did, and the Roaring Twenties were born.  The Jazz 
Age was
not due to bathtub gin, but rather hemp oil smoke blanketing the 
cities.  New York City, and in particular Wall Street, had the largest
concentration of hemp oil powered cars, and hence most of the frenzy 
started there.  People did not buy stocks because of any
irrational exuberance; they were stoned.

It all came crashing down when John D Rockefeller of Standard oil got 
hemp oil outlawed as a motor fuel, and forced the country to burn 
petroleum instead.
Once people sobered up, they quit buying stock, and the Great Depression 
started.

If only we would go back to burning hemp oil our problems would be over.

Please correct your Facts: below, and I would appreciate it if you 
could devote an entire part on the JtF site to getting the truth out.  Also,
if you could put a sponsored by Mike Weaver's Hemp Oil Engines - just 
599.99 payable in cash and a link to my website that would be great.

-Weaver

Keith Addison wrote:

   *   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to
 run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel
 engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on
 peanut oil.



Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!

Facts:

1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.

1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both Paris 
World Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.

But no peanut oil. The true story:

... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published 1912 
and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company that ran one 
of his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French government 
during the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where he 
determined fuel consumption and assessed operability. He also 
mentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg using 
castor oil and animal oils. - Darren Hill

It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book The Development of the 
Diesel Engine -afaik the last one he published until he drowned 
himself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested are 
described there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that had 
been sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil and 
even tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it was 
the French Otto-Company (yes the Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel's 
engine on peanut oil: The engine was built for crude oil and was 
used without any modification on vegoilit worked so well that 
only a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance. 
(Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors 1st reprint 
by Braun, Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.). - 
Stephan Helbig

Best

Keith


  

   * Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run on
 ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
 Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
 grown in the U.S.
   * Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
 Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
 favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol option.
   * Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East, Global
 Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
 finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
 of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
   * In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
 The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
 sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
 anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
 be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
 acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate the
 fields for a hundred years.

Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0-ax332x3239551;





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel 

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Mike Weaver
Actually, In1981, Ronald Reagan noted that  trees cause more pollution 
than automobiles. So you're right.
Let's get rid of all the plants!

John Beale wrote:

Silly Diesel and Ford. Everyone knows cars can't run on ethanol. That's  
why we, as humans, travel thousands of miles and invest billions of  
dollars in drilling rigs, pipelines, refineries, supertankers, and oil  
wars.

What were they thinking? Fuel from plants? That's preposterous! What  
have plants ever done for us? Last time I ran into some sumac, I had a  
terrible rash for weeks!

Everyone knows global warming is a big fraud invented by a joint effort  
between Greenpeace and the Democratic party to scare children away from  
playing hooky from school in the winter months to make snowmen. Just  
like love is a big fraud invented by Hallmark and Disney in an effort  
to increase revenues!

They must have been smoking that hemp and/or drinking its distillate.
-John



On Jun 8, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Mike Weaver wrote:

  

*   Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it  
to
  run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the  
diesel
  engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran  
on
  peanut oil.
* Two decades later, Henry Ford was designing his Model Ts to run  
on
  ethanol made from hemp. He envisioned the entire mass-produced
  Model T automobile line would run on ethanol derived from crops
  grown in the U.S.
* Even in the 1920s, the oil industry had massive lobbying power in
  Washington. Lobbyists convinced policymakers to create laws
  favoring petroleum based fuels while disgarding the ethanol  
option.
* Nearly a century later, amidst oil wars in the Middle East,  
Global
  Warming, and a nearly depleted oil supply, the U.S. government is
  finally shifting attention to fuels that are more along the lines
  of Diesel and Ford's original ideas.
* In an interview with the New York Times in 1925, Henry Ford said:
  The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that
  sumac out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust -- almost
  anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can
  be fermented. There's enough alcohol in one year's yield of an
  acre of potatoes to drive the machinery necessary to cultivate  
the
  fields for a hundred years.

Whose water is it? *Learn more:*
http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_658.cfm
http://alerts.organicconsumers.org/trk/click?ref=zqtbkk3um_0- 
ax332x3239551


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000  
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future redux

2006-06-08 Thread Mike Weaver
Everything old is new...

Hakan Falk wrote:

Mike W,

You are right!!!  I did not realize that the plastic surgery 
advanced to this level, or is it a brain transplant?

Hakan

At 14:22 08/06/2006, you wrote:
  

Is Bush really Dan Quayle?


Why wouldn't an enhanced deterrent, a more stable peace, a better
prospect to denying the ones who enter conflict in the first place to
have a reduction of offensive systems and an introduction to defensive
capability. I believe that is the route this country will eventually go.
--V.P. D.Q.

Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and
child. --V.P. D.Q.

Mars is essentially in the same orbit... somewhat the same distance from
the Sun, which is very important. We have seen pictures where there are
canals, we believe, and water. If there is water, that means there is
oxygen. If oxygen, that means we can breathe. --V.P. D.Q.

Hawaii has always been a very pivotal role in the Pacific. It is *in*
the Pacific. It is a part of the United States that is an island that is
right here. --V.P. D.Q., Hawaii, September 1989

What a terrible thing to have lost one's mind. Or not to have a mind at
all. How true that is. --V.P. D.Q. winning friends while speaking to the
United Negro College Fund

You all look like happy campers to me. Happy campers you are, happy
campers you have been, and, as far as I am concerned, happy campers you
will always be. --V.P. D.Q., to the American Samoans, whose capital
Quayle pronounces Pogo Pogo.

Quayle stumbled in response to a question about his opinion of the
Holocaust. He said it was an obscene period in our nation's history.
Then, trying to clarify his remark, Quayle said he meant this century's
history and added a confusing comment. We all lived in this century, I
didn't live in this century, he said. --V.P. D.Q.

We expect them [Salvadoran officials] to work toward the elimination of
human rights. --V.P. D.Q.

El Salvador is a democracy so it's not surprising that there are many
voices to be heard here. Yet in my conversations with Salvadorans... I
have heard a single voice. --V.P. D.Q.

I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and
democracy--but that could change. --V.P. D.Q.

One word sums up probably the responsibility of any vice president, and
that one word is to be prepared. --V.P. D.Q.

If we do not succeed, then we run the risk of failure. --V.P. D.Q., to
the Phoenix Republican Forum, March 1990

It's rural America. It's where I came from. We always refer to ourselves
as real America. Rural America, real America, real, real, America.
--V.P. D.Q.

Target prices? How that works? I know quite a bit about farm policy. I
come from Indiana, which is a farm state. Deficiency payments - which
are the key--that is what gets money into the farmer's hands. We got
loan, uh, rates, we got target, uh, prices, uh, I have worked very
closely with my senior colleague, (Indiana Sen.) Richard Lugar, making
sure that the farmers of Indiana are taken care of. --V.P. D.Q. on being
asked to define the term target prices. Quayle's press secretary then
cut short the press conference, after two minutes and 30 seconds.

I not going to focus on what I have done in the past what I stand for,
what I articulate to the American people. The American people will judge
me on what I am saying and what I have done in the last 12 years in the
Congress. --V.P. D.Q.

I want to be Robin to Bush's Batman. --V.P. D.Q.

We should develop anti-satellite weapons because we could not have
prevailed without them in Red Storm Rising. --V.P. D.Q.

The US has a vital interest in that area of the country. --V.P. D.Q.
Referring to Latin America.

Japan is an important ally of ours. Japan and the United States of the
Western industrialized capacity, 60 percent of the GNP, two countries.
That's a statement in and of itself. --V.P. D.Q.

May our nation continue to be the beakon of hope to the world. --The
Quayle's 1989 Christmas card. [Not a beacon of literacy, though.]

Well, it looks as if the top part fell on the bottom part. --V.P. D.Q.
referring to the collapsed section of the 880 freeway after the San
Francisco earthquake of 1989. [this may be a joke; the source is
unclear, but it's still funny]

...getting [cruise missiles] more accurate so that we can have precise
precision. --V.P. D.Q. referring to his legislative work dealing with
cruise missiles

I can identify with steelworkers. I can identify with workers that have
had a difficult time. --V.P. D.Q. addressing workers at an Ohio steel
plant,1988

[I will never have] another Jimmy Carter grain embargo, Jimmy, Jimmy
Carter, Jimmy Carter grain embargo, Jimmy Carter grain embargo. --V.P.
D.Q. during the Bentson debate

Certainly, I know what to do, and when I am Vice President--and I will
be--there will be contingency plans under different sets of situations
and I tell you what, I'm not going to go out and hold a news conference
about it. I'm going to put it in a safe and keep it 

Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Street
Oh yeah me too coffee (shade grown fair trade) is much too precious for 
any edible oil product like coffeemate. The only true use for it is as a 
burnt offering to the sun god to ensure the rest of your backpacking 
trip is rain free. Works well in arid regions. ;)

Joe

Kirk McLoren wrote:

snip
  
 I always managed to take milk for my coffee. That powdered crap isnt fit 
 for pigs. In a pinch take canned milk.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Street
Oh yeah I forgot to mention burnt hemp oil is an essential part of this 
ritual.  Just ask Mike 'oil sheik' Weaver he is an expert on the subject.
J

Joe Street wrote:

 Oh yeah me too coffee (shade grown fair trade) is much too precious for 
 any edible oil product like coffeemate. The only true use for it is as a 
 burnt offering to the sun god to ensure the rest of your backpacking 
 trip is rain free. Works well in arid regions. ;)
 
 Joe
 
 Kirk McLoren wrote:
 
 snip
 
 
I always managed to take milk for my coffee. That powdered crap isnt fit 
for pigs. In a pinch take canned milk.
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future - THE TRUTH

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Street
Works for me!

Mike Weaver wrote:

sip
 
 If only we would go back to burning hemp oil our problems would be over.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future

2006-06-08 Thread Michael Redler
Kirk,It's a very novel approach but, with all due respect, I thinkthe thermodynamics of this process needs a closer look.The origins of all mechanical energy can (eventually) be traced back to temperature changes. So, your intentions are in the right place.Thermal expansion as part of a cycle of combustionisa function of how low the mass of fuel and air is in comparison to the temperature during combustion. This not only causes a greater delta T by simple temperature comparison but, it also effects fuel density as explained by the ideal gas equation, PV=nRT.I haven't taken a thermo class in about fourteen years so,this observation could be refined. I'm going by memory here.MikeKirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Because it will absorb solar radiation.  and since there is a suspension transfer to the air will be rapid.  This all happens BEFORE ignition. Then oxidation does the final rise in temperature. Much higher delta T with same investment in O2 and hydrocarbon. And the hydrocarbon is nearignition point so unburned is not as much of a problem. If tapioca was black and finely divided that would be ok too. Assuming it was water free. Sugar has a lot of water too. - and it isnt the best solar absorber.I always managed to take milk for my coffee. That powdered crap isnt fit for pigs. In a pinch take canned milk.KirkJoe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Why pray tell
 COAL dust then? Many dusts are combustible. How about tapioca? How about icing sugar? Ever throw coffeemate into your campfire? (stand well back if you try thisunless it is part of a ritual dance of course)lolJoeKirk McLoren wrote: Actually a solar/coaldust hybrid could have potential. Putting solar  heat into air is difficult to do speedily and coal dust could be finely  dispersed. The bottom end could be solar. Certainly save on emissions  and help achieve complete combustion.A cylinder with a quartz window.  Kirk [snip]___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Back to the future - THE TRUTH

2006-06-08 Thread Michael Redler
Thanks Weaver!...if only his dream could be kept alive!Gridlock would take on a whole new meaning and I'd open a burger joint (pun intended) downtown.:-)-RedlerMike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Uh, Keith, hate to burst your bubble, but it is well-established that Rudolph Diesel designed his"engine" primarily to atomize hemp oil, in order to reap its psychopharmacological benefits. It was really just a big metal bong.The production of rotational torque was a side effect, and neccessary to keep the law enforcement people off his back. It wassomewhat later, at a "diesel party," that an attendee (the Cheech Marin of his day) said "23 skidoo, man, we should put this device
 into ahorseless carriage and drive around, then everyone could share the effects." This they did, and the Roaring Twenties were born. The Jazz Age wasnot due to bathtub gin, but rather hemp oil smoke blanketing the cities. New York City, and in particular Wall Street, had the largestconcentration of hemp oil powered cars, and hence most of the frenzy started there. People did not buy stocks because of any"irrational exuberance;" they were stoned.It all came crashing down when John D Rockefeller of Standard oil got hemp oil outlawed as a motor fuel, and forced the country to burn petroleum instead.Once people sobered up, they quit buying stock, and the Great Depression started.If only we would go back to burning hemp oil our problems would be over.Please correct your "Facts:" below, and I would appreciate it if you could devote an entire part on the JtF site to getting the truth out. Also,if you
 could put a "sponsored by Mike Weaver's Hemp Oil Engines - just 599.99 payable in cash" and a link to my website that would be great.-WeaverKeith Addison wrote: * Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp. In fact, when the diesel engine was first introduced at the World's Fair in 1900, it ran on peanut oil. Aarghh!!! Not the old Rudolf and the Peanut Oil fairytale again!Facts:1893 Rudolf Diesel patents the diesel engine.1900 Rudolf Diesel is twice awarded the Grand Prix at both Paris World Fairs (1900 and 1910) for inventing and developing his engine.But no peanut oil. The true story:"... excerpts from some of Dr Diesels' work, that he published 1912 and 1913, where he states that it was the Otto Company
 that ran one of his engines on peanut oil at the request of the French government during the 1900 World Fair. He later conducted some trails where he determined fuel consumption and assessed operability. He also mentions similar successful experiments in St. Petersburg using castor oil and animal oils." - Darren Hill"It WASN'T him! I recently borrowed his book "The Development of the Diesel Engine" -afaik the last one he published until he drowned himself in the Channel. All kinds of fuels that had been tested are described there, from coal dust over weird chemical mixtures that had been sent to Diesel by the industry to all sorts of crude oil and even tar-oil. Vegoil just got about 4 lines- remarking that it was the French "Otto-Company" (yes the Otto-engine!) that ran Diesel's engine on peanut oil: "The engine was built for crude oil and was used
 without any modification on vegoil."..."it worked so well that only a few insiders took notice of this insignificant circumstance." (Diesel, Rudolf. 1913. Die Entstehung des Dieselmotors" 1st reprint by Braun, Hans-Joachim (Ed). 1984. Moers: Steiger. Page 115.)." - Stephan HelbigBestKeith  [snip]___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/