Re: [swinog] www.admin.ch / www.parlament.ch down?
Anyone else who cannot reach http://www.admin.ch/ and http://www.parlament.ch/ (I intended to see the last mile debate) Perhaps they forgot admin.ch is already a customer of theirs and want to force them to pay them for peering?:) Markus ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Routing Problems to www.job.com
I wanna ask, if some other providers are encountering problems joining the site www.job.com . I have tried it out trough the Access, sunrise and cablecom line, but the page will not appear. Works here, but perhaps the guys had a problem with their server? Cheers, Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Terminalservice recommondations
Anyone can suggest a good, small and cheap terminalserver box with 4 ports? Find a 2nd hand Livingston Portmaster (PM-2), can't beat those... Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] BBC Multicast peering
If anyone is interested, the CIXP has a dedicated infrastructure for multicast traffic exchange (at no charge for CIXP members); some ISPs are alredy connected since a few months. Any web page documenting this, and possibly also who is already connected? I'm interesting in joining. Cheers, Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] INOC-DBA
Has anyone got those Cisco phones to work with INOC-DBA? Whom must
one contact? I have mailed {info,[EMAIL PROTECTED] but received
no reply.
Uhm, has anyone received phones from ALSO? I've neither got an
acknowledgement of my order (by fax) nor received any phones
so far...
Markus
--
VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG
Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland
Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122
Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: AW: [swinog] S.HDSL modem
I was curious to know if there was products (or technologies) capable of more that 2Mb on a copper pair ? Check out http://www.tahoe.pl/eng/xdsl_modems.php and the prices are good as well... Cheers, Markus ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Network Weather Map
There is a tool called mapserver that does a great job for rendering all kinds of maps. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the network weather Do you know whether there is some free GIS data for Switzerland? I was once looking for something that would go down to street/number level, but didn't find anything... Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Squid problem
old clumsy CacheFlow in place. They won't accept something like Hey, do it like ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/, because your browser stinks, or go and get a decent FTP client. Hasn't M$ discontinued support for user:pass@ qualification in URLs with recent IE updates/security-fixes? At least with http this no longer works (had to fix own software there as well...). Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Google problems
Same answer(no record available) for ns1-ns4.google.com, also for google.ch. Hm, works for me? ; DiG 8.3 @146.228.10.15 www.google.com ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 24, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www.google.com, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 66.102.9.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.37.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.39.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.41.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.51.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.53.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.57.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.59.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 66.102.11.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 66.102.7.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 64.233.167.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 64.233.161.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 66.102.9.104 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.37.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.39.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.41.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.51.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.53.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.57.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 216.239.59.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 66.102.11.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 66.102.7.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 64.233.167.99 www.google.com. 2m11s IN A 64.233.161.99 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: google.com. 2d17h45m38s IN NS ns1.google.com. google.com. 2d17h45m38s IN NS ns2.google.com. google.com. 2d17h45m38s IN NS ns3.google.com. google.com. 2d17h45m38s IN NS ns4.google.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns1.google.com. 3d2h8m7s IN A 216.239.32.10 ;; Total query time: 3 msec ;; FROM: janus to SERVER: 146.228.10.15 146.228.10.15 ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 15 15:50:35 2004 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 32 rcvd: 504 -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Rechtsradikale spam mails
We recognise tons of rechtsradikale spam mails today. Do you have similar sightings? Yup, looks like all Sober.G infected windows pcs are now used as spam-relay for this junk... Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] ISP's share Anti-Spam rules ?
Could a spammer take legal actions if he finds out that his business horizon mails are getting blocked ? I think about websites and faxnumbers. If you make blocking behavior customizable per customer, ie. the customer can deliberately decide he doesn't want to receive any mail that matches common swiss spam patterns (or however you'll call that ruleset), I don't see how that could be illegal? Unconditional filtering of mail based on probability is not something I'd consider to enable... Markus ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] BGP Question, metric incoming route-map
sh ip bgp regexp _3320_ (next hop addrs removed) Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i81.201.32.0/20 x.x.x.x 90 50 0 702 3320 ? *i y.y.y.y 100 50 0 286 3320 ? We have: 1. same local pref. 2. equal as-path length 3. metric on incoming (!) route map set manually to 90 for next hop x.x.x.x, and to 100 for y.y.y.y because I would prefer x.x.x.x over y.y.y.y if 1. and 2. are equal, because I learned once that smaller metric wins. Metric on external routes really is the MED of the route. Ciscos by default compare MEDs only of routes among the same peer AS (so if you had 2 uplinks with AS286, MED comparison would use the lower metric among those two gateways). Note that this behavior is very reasonable, because normally if you don't set your metric manually, you get whatever IGP metric your peer attaches to the route. You can't really compare a metric from ISP1's IGP to the IGP metric of ISP2, they could be completely different (one running OSPF, the other ISIS). If you always override the metric in route-maps, you could use bgp always-compare-med. If you only want to do route-selection locally on this router, use weights instead of metric. If you want to distribute the preference within your backbone, use local-pref. Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Shame on you! - No-shows at SWINOG-8
How about this: now shows will sponsor the next beer event ;-) or Dinner? Then they'll probably not show there either :) Markus ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?
Just an idea btw: everybody seems to work on that problem alone in its kitchen. Why not work a bit more together, for example on Switzerland/Swinog-level, to setup a kind of dynamic Swinog RBL ? As a start of working together, I've set up a small web site that documents the changes I made (and that are active on our mail servers). This is currently not for the faint of heart (you should know a bit more then how to use pkg_add or rpm on your system of choice...), but if you feel adventurous, have a look at http://www.dudes.ch/spamtracker I'll maintain this site (and the code changes) on my spare time, so if you port the thing to postfix, idefix, or whatever your alternate MTA is called, I'll happily add those. Cheers, Markus BTW: since the whole discussion was started because a certain ISP started to block address ranges: we currently have 112 hi##ed.ch entries in the spamtracker... -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?
nice page. note that qmail behaves substantially different: it accepts all recipients (well, for domains it is responsible for) and bounces them afterwards. This makes it more difficult to harvest for valid mail addresses, with the drawback of creating more traffic for accepting and Uhm, is this a non-teakable behavior? In my eyes it is crucial to be able to refuse SPAM at the earliest possible moment, because for every mail you can refuse during the SMTP handshake phase, you don't have to do the explicit bounce (and receive all the double bounces of non-valid sender addresses in the first place). With all the virii and worms in the wild that just fake sender addresses, you don't really want to put this burden upon your mail server. Your queues will grow and grow with non-deliverable error bounces, slowing down your regular mail delivery. bouncing these mails. And most of these bounces go to postmaster, because the sender addresses are forged. PS: if you want collaboration, why not set up a wiki wiki? Good idea, I'll look into this! Markus PS: sorry about the old email address, but this list server is pretty picky in which addresses it accepts mail from.. ;-) -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?
Just an idea btw: everybody seems to work on that problem alone in its kitchen. Why not work a bit more together, for example on Switzerland/Swinog-level, to setup a kind of dynamic Swinog RBL ? As a start of working together, I've set up a small web site that documents the changes I made (and that are active on our mail servers). This is currently not for the faint of heart (you should know a bit more then how to use pkg_add or rpm on your system of choice...), but if you feel adventurous, have a look at http://www.dudes.ch/spamtracker I'll maintain this site (and the code changes) on my spare time, so if you port the thing to postfix, idefix, or whatever your alternate MTA is called, I'll happily add those. Cheers, Markus BTW: since the whole discussion was started because a certain ISP started to block address ranges: we currently have 112 hi##ed.ch entries in the spamtracker... -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] cablecom antispam strategy
Using the existence or non-existence of an PTR RR for the legitimacy of sending email is completely bogus. Ack. There's _tons_ of cable/DSL links with correct RR pointers that are utter SPAM engines, and judging from the recent reaction to CCs move, a _lot_ of valid MTAs that don't have matching or even existing RRs. Rejecting these is not really going to avoid a lot of spam, but it going to make you unreachable for a considerable amount of (potential) customers, and customers of your customers. For us at least, that's completely unacceptable. Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?
Do big ISP have security systems, which blacklist or return a SMTP 55x after getting n*1000 mails from the same server? You'll be automatically blocked for a day if you send us more than a (low) amount of non-existant recipients (which easily happens if your customer doesn't keep a clean list of email addresses, which is unlikely if he has several thousand recipients). Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?
You'll be automatically blocked for a day if you send us more than a (low) amount of non-existant recipients (which easily happens if... nice concept, should be quite practical against dictionnary Exactly, this was the prime reason for coming up with it, because I was just sick of watching those guys essentially taking a dump of our email configuration without us being able to do something about it. attacks. Have you implemented that by yourself, or was it already a feature of your MTA ? And what kind of blocking art, if I may ask: 4xx, 5xx or even iptable rule? It's a custom modification to sendmail-8.12.10. My recent conversion of the previous berkeley-db based approach to a central MySQL db for storing the records of violating IP addresses is now in field trial on two of our mail servers. If nothing goes wrong I should have all of them on the new code by the weekend, and I'll then also publish the code. Just as a quick summary: - the modification triggers an insertion of a record into the database with an expiration date and some detail information which comes in handy for later analysis. It also kicks the current session out with a 421 error (this is RFC compliant behavior). Timeout and thresholds are configurable. - the normal configuration file does all the rest. The check_relay function uses a map (backed with the same MySQL table) to determine whether the incoming call should be blocked, and if so, it is rejected using standard sendmail mechanisms. - there's support for whitelist entries that will never be blocked (but sessions will still be dropped upon violation of the criteria) I'll try to setup the same kind of system for our servers (qmail-vmailmgr qmail-ldap based). Don't know these, but what you need are these components: - some place to wedge into your mail server where it counts the number of failed recipients. Perhaps (as sendmail does) it already has a feature to throttle (insert sleeps/delays) when exceeding a specific amount of failed recipients. That's a very good place to do more than just complain. - some generic way of performing a map-/table-lookup for incoming connections, whether those should be allowed to proceed. - we also use LDAP based mail routing internally, but I deliberately decided against putting these records into LDAP because LDAP sucks at write performance, and there can be potentially tons of inserts if one of the guys with a distributed spam network starts a mailing. This was the prime design decision to use MySQL for this purpose. Cheers, Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Contacts Swissonline / Hispeed
Now the users think their mails have been succesfully delivered because they won't receive a bounce mail until the mail expires in the queue (1 week). Quite frankly, that sucks. Uhm, normally they should get warning mails in between, unless you have changed common settings? At least that would be the behavior with sendmail. ~ 451 Your mailserver has been blocked, please see This is not correct. A 4xx error will keep the mail in the queue until it expires (just like blocking smtp connections). What you want is an 5xx answer for an immediate bounce to the user. Yes and no... I actually deliberately return 4xx errors for my (temporarily!) blocked addresses, because I do want servers to retry submission (if the sender actually does use a normal, queuing MTA, and not just a bulkmailer that will treat 4xx just like 5xx). Also, I find an odd kind of satisfaction to know that open 3rd party relays will then pile up SPAM :) If you reject your peer at the beginning, and if you have some rate-limiting per client on your mail server (I recommend both), they can try to hit you hard and it won't hurt that much (and you do tie up some of their resources, which they then can't use to spam someone else at the same time). Cheers, Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt becauseof Spam blocks
Next use either connection limiting features (such as FreeBSD ipfw2) Just one word of caution on this one: I've had this activated on our mail server (IPFW2 in 4.x-STABLE) a couple of months ago, and it lead to very odd memory corruption issues (panics that _all_ looked like hardware problems, like bogus memory, cpus, etc. Panics traced within the filesystem, traps, whatever, but never within firewall or just generally, networking code). It took me quite a while to figure out where these were coming from (after much hardware replaced...). Don't know whether this bug has been found/fixed, looked very hard to locate. Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] OSPF Tuning...
RE: [swinog] OSPF Tuning... why do you want to tune ospf timers ? the default dead time is 120 sec. if a router crashs and the physical layer Huh? Not in my case..: GigabitEthernet0/0.4 is up, line protocol is up .. Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 .. doesnt go down for any reason (like bridged ethernet link with switches in the middle), you can sit down, take a coffee, smoke a cig, whatever, until I've actually reduced timers in exactly such a setup (GE-ring based on switches, with VLANs forming pseudo-WAN links for attached routers). In retrospect, I wouldn't do this again though, would probably rather try to tweak STP to converge faster than to touch OSPF timers (reason: in DOS situations where links get saturated, having lower timers is a bitch...). I'm currently at hello=5 on this ring. Cheers, Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] delegation only patch?
Just a quick review: which providers have already installed the
Bind delegation only patch re. Verisign/Sitefinder (or similar
for their environment)?
Done this the last couple of days for VIA (some servers upgraded to latest bind9,
others bind8 forwarder-chained to the new bind9 ones as per the instructions
on www.isc.org). Only thing to watch out: there _are_ TLDs that include
non-delegation records, so don't be too restrictive in your root-delegation-only
clause. With the following setting from what I can tell in the logs there should
be no legit entries rejected, but I'll have to recheck in a while:
root-delegation-only exclude { de; lv; museum; us; ch; biz; };
(I don't know about .ch - there at least USED to be MX records in there
directly in the good old UUCP times, don't know whether some survived;-)).
Markus
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Speed Reduce a FE-Port
i do have just confused about bit/kbits... rate-limit input access-group 100 248000 1500 2000 conform-action transmit 1500 and 2000: here it seems to be kbits rate-limit input 2048000 256000 256000 conform-action transmit 256000 seems to be bits. They're bytes.. actually, they're sizes of virtual buckets used to implement the policer. Essentially as far as I recall it, you have these: speed (bps) size of conforming bucket (Byte) size of burst bucket (Byte) the speed defines your measuring interval (if your speed was the same as the physical speed, your max size of the first bucket would be speed/8, and so would be the burst bucket. This is a good value to start your tuning numbers with). Since in this case your physical speed is higher, you _could_ get more data thru the link. IOS will make sure that on average, the given speed is not exceeded, but with the bucket sizes you can tweak how quickly/ aggressively it actually drops packets that don't conform. I suggest you read thru some of the Cisco documents on traffic shaping and policing, they go into much more details on how these parameters play together internally. Something you might consider for smoothest rate limiting: - use traffic-shape for outgoing traffic - use rate-limit for incoming traffic This should be least disruptive for TCP connections. Cheers, Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Re: Short outage at TIX
We would wish to see a configurable option to allow STP information to be ignored, and filtered at the port, and/or the port to be disabled completely, on a per port basis. We have: interface e 1/4 port-name TIX-Uplink-new no spanning-tree sh int e 1/4 ... STP configured to OFF, priority is level0, flow control enabled this is a Foundry switch, is there no equivalent for Cisco? Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Portmaster 2 or 2e for sale?
boxes with some network interfaces and red circle logos on them. No idea what that was, and no idea what Portmaster is. Good site about portmasters: http://www.portmasters.com Cheers, Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Portmaster 2 or 2e for sale?
KPN/Quest is closing the business in Switzerland, and they sell That's putting it somewhat mildly ;-) lots of equipment cheap. I've seen there some gears with Lucent logo on If you really saw equipment with Lucent logo on them, it must have been DSLMAX20 DSLAMs (1HU things), not Portmasters (we never bought them that late, ours all still had Livingston logos). There might be a few DSLMAX20 left (nice little SDSL concentrators, really!), but definitely no PM2(e). Cheers, Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] CERN
Does the CERN have routing troubles? It seems all their peerings are down. Anyone got its peering to CERN/AS513 down? Not everything's down at CIXP, but certainly the two 513 nodes. Perhaps there's a partial either power or switch outage? Since I had to reboot the router due to the IOS bug, I don't have a lot of historic info, but so far, there's: - 1 session up longer than 2days - 6 sessions came up a bit more than 4h ago - 4 sessions down since a bit less than 14h Times are sufficiently close to suggest that some common event caused the sessions to go down (and for some to come back up again). Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] STM-1 Standard Interface?
Perhaps, this is a stupid question, but which interface is normaly used, when we buy stm-1 bandwith from a carrier or when we order a stm-1 connection to connect two pop of us? We only use PA-POS-OC3SMI. Only exception would be if you specifically order an ATM STM-1 service from a carrier. Cheers, Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] RFC1918 ip's within trace on normal provider-link
A null route will not stop you from getting those addresses on a trace. That's problem of your upstream provider's backbone. Well... not really a problem. Just some people don't like to see them on traces. It can actually be a problem, since if that node would want to signal back icmp messages (for example indicating a too large packet), such a message could reasonably be filtered on its way back, since strictly speaking private addresses are not supposed to appear in the open. Result: connectivity problems. Cheers, Markus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
