Re: [swinog] Steinmann V2.0 here
Hey Stony all the best for your Fam V2.0 Congrats :) Rog Viktor Steinmann schrieb: Hi all My wife and I are happy to announce that our daughter Anna Sophie was born yesterday (tuesday, 19.10) at 14:15 - or in binary form: 1 + 1 = 11 :-) Pics and more will follow this weekend on www.stony.com. Cheers, Viktor ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] cablecom on blacklist...
can fully ack: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=62.2.95.247 rog Steven Glogger wrote: for those wondering why we dont get mails from cablecom: http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblockip=62.2.95.247 http://psbl.surriel.com/listing?ip=62.2.95.247 http://www.spamcannibal.org/cannibal.cgi?lookup=62.2.95.247page=lookup ... greetings -steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Distributed Layer-2 Internet Exchanges
Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Alexander Koch wrote: Maybe the layer-2 infrastructure? Technically it's possible, we all know that. Whether it makes sense, this is another topic and not discussed here. why not discuss it here a bit? I feel it would make a lot of sense, even for us! Sure it's on topic, but it has nothing to do with IXeurope's recent acquisition, therefore I changed the subject. Seeing that we will likely leave several public exchanges as traffic grows too much to handle it safely on a shared infrastructure some select peerings are surely making a lot of sense here, and for Switzerland especially, I should say. This seems to be quite common recently by larger carriers. If we consider AMS-IX recent upgrades to 10GBps links, large IX might reach their capacity limits soon. Think about a L2 link between these two sites, being available as a special VLAN on both public exchanges in addition to those completely seperate ones that all operators are welcome to keep on running, not touch, etc. Operationally it should not be any problem in my view to safely exchange one VLAN for the interconnection of these two exchanges, it would be an added service, it would normally not affect those that take the plain 'TIX' or 'CIXP' service. ACK. Something similar is done in Switzerland by SwissIX with two sites currently, and several other IX'es elsewhere. Question is: would small ISP be willing to pay an extra fee for getting just a few additional peers? CIXP and TIX are overlapping quite a bit, and considering current IP transit prices, small ISP must think to start leaving Exchanges too. If small ISP cannot handle a large amount of traffic over an IX, it's simply no longer worth to be member of it. Likewise we see IP transit pricing going down to 20% of the price of three years ago, however IX ports are still on the same rate or even more expensive. Therefore being member of TIX for instance does not value any longer unless small ISP can handle at least 5 MBps over it. In other words: I'd like to see port prices falling to reflect IP transit prices - otherwise commercial IX'es become obsolete, because large carrier cannot handle traffic over it anymore and will move to private peering and for small isp it's no longer worth to peer themselves because buying IP transit is simply much cheaper. small ISP will maybe happy, if IXEurope can offer VLan's from all they're nodes in Europe? would this make sense? My CHF 0.05 F. Rog -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Backbone Solutions is spamming again.
don't peer to
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Dear all,
Again, Backbone Solutions AG is spamming again. See below.
Please consider to shutdown peering. This is simply not a behaviour of a
serious ISP.
Regards,
Fredy
From - Fri Mar 26 17:50:39 2004
X-UIDL: _;0!:eD!![1a!9X!
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.backbone.ch (mail.backbone.ch [212.117.192.242])
by taguan.init7.net (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i2QGDDF21402
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:13:13 +0100
Received: from TESTPC (sonic.backbone.ch [212.117.192.139])
by mail.backbone.ch (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id
i2QGOfkK016387
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:24:41 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Backbone Solutions AG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Backbone Solutions AG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Neu: 2.5 Mbps Standleitung fuer CHF 399.-
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:13:19 +0100
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Mach5MailerMsgPart123X456_000_5CEAC75F
X-Mailer: Mach5 Mailer-3.00 PID{b0d24b08-d5e3-4c29-a9d6-b5d6b0d19f84}
RI{f3531-435e9}
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on taguan
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_50_60,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-UIDL: _;0!:eD!![1a!9X!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] cisco port 80 permit
hello i do have again a Q for Cisco-cracks... i would like, that i'm able to reach _only_ the port 80 on 192.168.1.1 @ f0/1 on a Cisco 2621 i did interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.1.55 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 115 in ip access-group 116 out no ip directed-broadcast duplex auto speed auto and access-list 115 deny tcp any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 neq www access-list 115 deny udp any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 neq 80 access-list 116 permit udp 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 116 permit tcp 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any but it would work. do have somebody a hint for it? sh ver= Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 07-Dec-99 02:12 by phanguye Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x807AAF70 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.1(3r)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) may i should change the ios-sw? Thanks Rotsch -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] [Fwd: Die schnellsten Internetzugnge zu den besten Preisen in der Schweiz.]
Hello First, cablecom (hispeed/swissonline) is blocking Spam and more... then: produce Spam by an other Spamer Funny, not? Rog Original-Nachricht Betreff:Die schnellsten Internetzugnge zu den besten Preisen in der Schweiz. Datum: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:22:07 CET Von:cablecom hispeed internet-team [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: me, of couse... Fehlen in Ihrem E-Mail die Bilder/Farben oder ist der Text unbersichtlich, dann klicken Sie bitte hier. http://imn.ch/mailing/track.php3?adr=1817166ma=15774mt=2lan=G Es gab noch keinen besseren Zeitpunkt fr einen Breitband-Internetanschluss. Kommen Sie jetzt zu cablecom. http://imn.ch/mailing/track.php3?adr=1817166ma=15776mt=2lan=G Grezi Herr Buchwalder Die Experten sind sich einig: cablecom hispeed internet bietet die schnellsten Internetzugnge der Schweiz zu den besten Preisen. Egal, ob Sie surfen, grosse Dokumente verschicken, die neusten Musikdateien herunterladen oder online gamen mit cablecom hispeed internet geht alles so schnell und so gnstig wie noch nie zuvor. *Warum ist der Internetanschluss bei cablecom so leistungsfhig? * Unser Breitband-Netzwerk machts mglich. Fr die Datenbertragung verwenden wir nicht herkmmliche Telefonleitungen, sondern das Breitband-Netzwerk von cablecom, ber das enorme Datenmengen aus dem Internet bereit gestellt werden knnen. So wird cablecom hispeed internet viel schneller und gnstiger als die Abonnements der ADSL-Internet-Anbieter. *Hier der Beweis: * http://imn.ch/mailing/track.php3?adr=1817166ma=15777mt=2lan=G http://imn.ch/mailing/track.php3?adr=1817166ma=15778mt=2lan=G * Alle cablecom hispeed internet-Anschlsse im Vergleich mit den ADSL-Anbietern. * http://imn.ch/mailing/track.php3?adr=1817166ma=15779mt=2lan=G *Profitieren Sie jetzt vom besten Preis-Leistungs-Verhltnis der Schweiz und melden Sie sich noch heute online an! * Natrlich beraten wir Sie gerne auch persnlich. Rufen Sie uns kostenfrei an: *Tel. 0800 32 *(Mo - Fr, 8.00 - 18.00 Uhr)* * Mit freundlichen Grssen Ihr cablecom hispeed internet-Team Mehr Informationen zu cablecom finden Sie auf: www.cablecom.ch http://www.cablecom.ch?reccode=hsMailing022004 Falls Sie keine e-Mail Werbung von cablecom mehr wnschen, dann klicken Sie bitte hier http://imn.ch/adr/rem.php3?adr=1817166m=3298. http://www.schober.ch Adressherkunft Sie erhalten dieses E-Mail, weil Sie durch die Schober Adress Datenbank erhoben wurden. Datenschutz Der Absender dieses E-Mails hat zu keinem Zeitpunkt Zugriff auf Ihre persnlichen Daten! Fr weitere Infos zu Schober Information Group *klicken Sie hier* http://www.schober.ch -- Fr weitere Ausknfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfgung. Mit freundlichen Grssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Microsoft Internet Explorer Patch 834489
Hi i think the user/pwd in the url isn't a good idea. (other ppl on the pc - ie-history...) i would rewrite (or add an add-in) the website, with a loggin on it. and with a db, you'll have an nice controll... Rog Matthias Hertzog schrieb: Hi there! Microsoft has released a IE patch Number 834489. This patch makes URLs like http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED] unusable. Since we have a few applications (intranets, closed user groups, a.s.o) running which use this kind of verification, our customers are running into problems after applying this patch. mhs has released informations at http://www.mhs.ch/mhsservices/patch.shtml (sorry, german only) and is currently informing customers affected by this. Please don't start any political (Anti-MS) discussions now. I fully agree, that this MS patch is pure bullshit. I'm very interested in your points of view and possible _technical_ solutions in that. Best wishes, Matthias BTW: Microsoft's informations: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];834489 M.H. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: [swinog] Infos about Zebra Root Server at TIX ?
me too sh ip bgp su [...] 194.42.48.126 4 8235 223301 141366 0 0 0 3d21h Idle (PfxCt) [...] Rog Roman Hochuli schrieb: What harddisk crash? It has an uptime of 223 days... Are you talking about 194.42.48.126 (the TIX route server) or the Netlantis stuff also located at TIX? I have an uptime of something over 3 days a the moment. Anyway I am missing ~300 prefixes from the routeserver since that time. May there be some guys who have to clear their bgp-sessions...? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: AW: [swinog] Infos about Zebra Root Server at TIX ?
hi my routeserver got: 194.42.48.126 4 8235 224108 141379 10281423 0 0 00:08:16 791 ^^^ (I've cleared the bgp-session few minutes ago :)=) ) rog Roman Hochuli schrieb: I have a script which checks received prefixes againts a minimum-limit. Since Wed Feb 4 15:36:27 CET 2004 it's running wild because since I miss the mentioned ~300 prefixes. I receive at the moment ~580 prefixes. When I configured my script there were more than 850... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] New worm is spreading fast...
Hello can confim that too Mydoom is the name. close tcp port 3127 on client side (they who are already infected) will help... Rog Michel Renfer schrieb: Hi All We see more and more blocked emails in our antivirus deamon for this type of virus: Antivirus Nachricht(en): infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768 Seems to be a very bad one... [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a mass-mailing worm. The worm will arrive as an attachment with a file extension of .bat, .cmd, .exe, .pif, .scr, or .zip. When the machine gets infected, the worm will set up a backdoor into the system by opening TCP ports 3127 thru 3198. This will potentially allow a hacker to connect to the machine and utilize it as a proxy to gain access to it's network resources. In addition, the backdoor has the ability to download and execute arbitrary files. The worm will perform a DoS starting on February 1, 2004. On February 12, 2004 the worm has a trigger date to stop spreading. regards, michel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX
hmmm... from our cisco (?): router# telnet 62.2.95.11 25 220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:44:48 +0100 ehlo into.ch 250-mx.hispeed.ch Hello tix1.into.ch [194.42.48.59] (may be forged), pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 10485760 250-DSN 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP quit 221 2.0.0 mx.hispeed.ch closing connection but one of our mailserver: telnet 62.2.95.11 25 port 25: failed to open myabe we may change the ip form our smtp? but this should NOT to be the solution... cheers Rog Erich Hohermuth schrieb: On Wednesday 21 January 2004 17:06, Oliver Bolliger wrote: personally i think they did some changes to this end of last week - we have been watching some @hispeed.ch or @swissonline.ch queues start growing on friday last weeek. I run some tests from our mailservers. The MX to swissonline.ch and hispeed.ch points to mx.hispeed.ch. I've only get twice a connection refuse. # telnet mx.hispeed.ch. 25 Trying 62.2.95.11... Connected to mx.hispeed.ch. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:34:26 +0100 quit 221 2.0.0 mx.hispeed.ch closing connection Connection closed by foreign host. Regards Erich -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] seriosity of five-ten-sg.com blacklist :-/
Hello I do have also some ugly failure. i'm now in china. see: 98.199.118.217.china.spam.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Address: 127.0.0.2 = spam... Benoit Panizzon schrieb: Hi all Have you had similar experiences with the five-ten-sg.com DNS-Based blacklist operators? They have blacklisted 157.161.0.0/16 wich belongs to improware. I and a friend also operating hosts in that range contacted five ten sg to know why they blocked that range. We both got the same answer: 157.161.0.0/16 has missing or consecutive reverse dns, no RIPE customer reallocation records that identify the customer, no rwhois server. We don't accept mail directly from such ip addresses. Improware could fix those issues. So I got in contact with improware. Their statement ist: The whole range belongs to improware and it's business units like teleport, so they see no need to register those business units to ripe. There are no missing revere DNS entires. They don't operate a rwhois server for security issues. From my point of view I see no need for five ten sg to keep that range blacklisted, especialy as they could not send me any prove of spam or other abuse from that range. (Surely there are viruses from teleport cable-internet customers, but I personaly know the improware abuse person and they block those customers as soon as they get notified) So what now? Considering five-ten-sg as defunct and telling everybody not to use them anymore? -Benoit- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] seriosity of five-ten-sg.com blacklist :-/
Hello I do have also some ugly failure. i'm now in china. see: 98.199.118.217.china.spam.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Address: 127.0.0.2 = spam... Benoit Panizzon schrieb: Hi all Have you had similar experiences with the five-ten-sg.com DNS-Based blacklist operators? They have blacklisted 157.161.0.0/16 wich belongs to improware. I and a friend also operating hosts in that range contacted five ten sg to know why they blocked that range. We both got the same answer: 157.161.0.0/16 has missing or consecutive reverse dns, no RIPE customer reallocation records that identify the customer, no rwhois server. We don't accept mail directly from such ip addresses. Improware could fix those issues. So I got in contact with improware. Their statement ist: The whole range belongs to improware and it's business units like teleport, so they see no need to register those business units to ripe. There are no missing revere DNS entires. They don't operate a rwhois server for security issues. From my point of view I see no need for five ten sg to keep that range blacklisted, especialy as they could not send me any prove of spam or other abuse from that range. (Surely there are viruses from teleport cable-internet customers, but I personaly know the improware abuse person and they block those customers as soon as they get notified) So what now? Considering five-ten-sg as defunct and telling everybody not to use them anymore? -Benoit- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] seriosity of five-ten-sg.com blacklist :-/
Hello I do have also some ugly failure. i'm now in china. see: 98.199.118.217.china.spam.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Address: 127.0.0.2 = spam... Benoit Panizzon schrieb: Hi all Have you had similar experiences with the five-ten-sg.com DNS-Based blacklist operators? They have blacklisted 157.161.0.0/16 wich belongs to improware. I and a friend also operating hosts in that range contacted five ten sg to know why they blocked that range. We both got the same answer: 157.161.0.0/16 has missing or consecutive reverse dns, no RIPE customer reallocation records that identify the customer, no rwhois server. We don't accept mail directly from such ip addresses. Improware could fix those issues. So I got in contact with improware. Their statement ist: The whole range belongs to improware and it's business units like teleport, so they see no need to register those business units to ripe. There are no missing revere DNS entires. They don't operate a rwhois server for security issues. From my point of view I see no need for five ten sg to keep that range blacklisted, especialy as they could not send me any prove of spam or other abuse from that range. (Surely there are viruses from teleport cable-internet customers, but I personaly know the improware abuse person and they block those customers as soon as they get notified) So what now? Considering five-ten-sg as defunct and telling everybody not to use them anymore? -Benoit- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] anyone going to the techie-party@TIX ?
yup! i'm coming too Guentensperger, Robert schrieb: me too! Günti || -Original Message- || From: Steven Glogger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:06 AM || To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Subject: RE: [swinog] anyone going to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? || || || i will be there... || || -Original Message- || From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || Behalf Of Pascal Gloor || Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:03 AM || To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Subject: [swinog] anyone going to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? || || || all in the subject || || || || Pascal || -- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: || http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ || || -- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: || http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ || -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] adsl speed
hello did somebody got news about the reaction of the swisscom regarding speed? Cheers Rog -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] spam?
Hello folks i've (maybe stupid) question to the group about spam: For my understanding, spam is unwanted Advertisement. Today morning, i wake up, because somebody rang on my door. my still sleepy body crept tiredly to the door and open it. i saw a wide-smiling face looking to me. may i have a question about your telephone? what? I'm from Sunrise!. Please?!? I never saw spam in person before. usually i can press the delete-button or throw some paper away but it is never happen, that spam put me out of my warm and comfortably bed. I yus will say: I LOVE E(lectronic) AND P(aper) SPAM!!! Those leave me at least in my bed! Sunrise abuse: Please change H(uman) Spam into E-Spam. I hope you'll have a nice weekend... Rog -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] p2p + us
hello what do you think about this? got someone else those spams? Sorry only germansky US-Filmstudios und Musiklabels spammen Schweizer ISPs Bis zu mehrmals täglich erhalten die grösseren Schweizer ISPs wie Bluewin, Green.ch oder Solnet E-Mails oder gar Faxe von den grossen Filmstudios und Musiklabels oder deren rechtlichen Vertretern. Sie unterrichten die ISPs über illegale P2P-Tauschaktivitäten ihrer Kunden, und bitten die ISPs, diese zu unterbinden. Die meisten Provider leiten diesen Hinweis an die betreffenden User weiter, manche drohen mit Sperrung des Accounts. Mehr zum Umgang der ISPs mit der brisanten Post und was P2P-Nutzer wirklich zu befürchten haben lesen Sie in der aktuellen Netzwoche. Dort lesen Sie zudem über die neuen Multimedia-Portale der Mobilfunktanbieter und die Aufrüstung für UMTS. Und im Interview legt Urs Stahlberger, CEO Swisscom IT-Services dar, wie sich das Unternehmen künftig positionieren möchte und vor allem im Drittkundengeschäft wachsen will. http://www.netzwoche.ch/aktuelles_inhalt.cfm and yes, enjoy this: http://www.gordo.it/gordo/the_tribe.htm cheers Rog Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Peering AS15398
Hello Does somebudy know the status of as15398? is this peer to remove from the bgp-neighbor? Cheers Rog . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Google routing troubles?
hi what's the target? www.google.ch? or an IP? 66.102.11.99? Rog Benoit Panizzon wrote: from cybernet: 3 zrhth-pe2.cybernet-ag.ch (212.90.192.151) 1177.114 ms 9.035 ms 9.936 ms 4 213.200.201.237 (213.200.201.237) 82.541 ms 415.129 ms 381.273 ms 5 213.200.201.238 (213.200.201.238) 7.931 ms 14.384 ms 11.436 ms 6 ge-0-0-0-2.zur10.ip.tiscali.net (213.200.70.21) 6.498 ms 26.397 ms 14.067 ms 7 * * so-1-0-0.sjc10.ip.tiscali.net (213.200.82.233) 185.383 ms 8 eqixsj-google-gige.google.com (206.223.116.21) 177.883 ms * 180.107 ms 9 * * from cyberlink: 2 zhtix-core1.gi00-37.cyberlink.ch (212.55.223.1) 0.944 ms 1.028 ms 0.929 ms 3 AMS-IX.AMS-1-eth110.nl.lambdanet.net (195.69.144.212) 59.483 ms 59.718 ms 59.050 ms 4 F-8-eth030-0.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.105.42) 66.115 ms 66.173 ms 66.131 ms 5 Google-F.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.111.38) 67.234 ms 65.664 ms 66.148 ms 6 * * from netstream: 4 gw0.atm-1-0-0.decix.de.netstream.com (62.65.128.130) 27.557 ms 27.888 ms 27.779 ms 5 de-cix.net.google.com (80.81.192.108) 28.483 ms 28.895 ms 28.525 ms 6 64.233.174.141 (64.233.174.141) 52.111 ms 43.692 ms 43.521 ms 7 216.239.49.254 (216.239.49.254) 52.964 ms 63.813 ms 52.876 ms 8 216.239.49.114 (216.239.49.114) 53.282 ms 53.390 ms 55.370 ms 9 * * from imp.ch: 3 bsl-dsp1-fe-3-1.gw.imp.ch (157.161.252.93) 0.739 ms 0.839 ms 0.896 ms 4 s1-1-1-r3-ZRH.eu.cw.net (212.80.191.33) 8.413 ms 7.326 ms 7.263 ms 5 tr1-r2-ZRH.eu.cw.net (212.80.162.170) 7.184 ms 7.532 ms 8.499 ms 6 atm0-0-0-2-r2-FRA.eu.cw.net (212.80.160.25) 39.661 ms 38.719 ms 39.122 ms 7 tr1-r1-FRA.eu.cw.net (212.80.162.41) 26.959 ms 31.427 ms 29.447 ms 8 bcr2-so-6-1-0.Frankfurt.cw.net (166.63.193.165) 26.871 ms 30.978 ms 28.543 ms 9 bcr2.Thamesside.cw.net (166.63.210.62) 50.542 ms bcr1.Paris.cw.net (208.172.250.61) 37.222 ms 40.208 ms 10 bcr1-so-7-0-0.London.cw.net (208.172.251.210) 46.280 ms 48.054 ms ycr2-so-0-0-0.Dublin.cw.net (166.63.209.198) 59.099 ms 11 ycr1-ae0.Dublin.cw.net (208.175.245.5) 59.569 ms 57.497 ms 58.233 ms 12 google.Dublin.cw.net (208.175.245.94) 57.256 ms 54.057 ms 54.397 ms 13 64.233.174.49 (64.233.174.49) 55.909 ms 54.040 ms 54.931 ms 14 216.239.49.18 (216.239.49.18) 56.380 ms 56.716 ms 58.200 ms 15 * Anyone an idea? -Benoit- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] RIPE question
i guess you have to splitt 0.0.1.64 255.255.255.128 to two 255.255.255.192 just my idea... Rog Gregoire Huet wrote: Dear All, Trying to get some assignements from RIPE, i'm being insulted by the 'hostmaster' robot, telling me : The subnet with prefix '0.0.1.64' is on an invalid bit boundary for the subnet mask '255.255.255.128'. Here is the assignement i would like : 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 12830 128 128 Some stuff 0.0.0.128 255.255.255.128 128 120 128 128 Some other stuff 0.0.1.0 255.255.255.192 6440 6464 Some different stuff 0.0.1.64 255.255.255.128 12830 128 128 Some other different stuff 0.0.1.192 255.255.255.192 6420 4064 Some usual stuff 0.0.2.0 255.255.255.128 12820 50 100 Some other usual stuff I really do not get why it is not correct. Can someone give me a clue on that ? Thanks a lot in advance Greg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Router errors
Hello We do have with one of our Routers this problems Does anyone has an idea what that could be? ...after 'debug all'... :) * Router1 MLP: Lost fragment 1a 219494 MLP: Packet discarded (unable to coalesce) Se0/0 MLP-FS: I seq C0219801 size 58 0xFF 0x3 0x0 0x3D 0xC0 0x21 0x98 0x1 0x0 0x21 0x45 0x0 0x0 0x30 0x65 *** %SYS-2-GETBUFFFAIL: Middle buffer allocation (600 bytes) failed from 0x8022D85C -Process= interrupt level, ipl= 1, pid= 54 -Traceback= 802774E0 80278348 8022D860 8045D360 8045D47C 801AC7FC 8008B454 80091 064 8008E68C 802F83DC 802CAA1C 802EBC9C 802EBC9C 802CAADC 802EBA78 80284C50 0xFF 0x3 0x0 0x3D 0xC0 0x21 0x9A 0x4F 0x0 0x21 0x45 0x0 0x0 0x30 0x4F *** Vi1 PPP: I pkt type 0x0021, datagramsize 52 Vi1 MLP: O packets link=ip Se0/0 MLP: O seq 8020C342 size 54 0xFF 0x3 0x0 0x3D 0x80 0x20 0xC3 0x42 0x0 0x21 0x45 0x0 0x0 0x5C 0xA3 Se0/2 MLP: O seq 4020C343 size 56 0xFF 0x3 0x0 0x3D 0x40 0x20 0xC3 0x43 0xAA 0xAA 0xAA 0xAA 0xAA 0xAA 0xAA Se0/0 MLP: Link oqueue dequeue, old txcount 0 Se0/0 MLP: Got pak 1, output Se0/0 Se0/0 MLP: Link oqueue dequeue, old txcount 0 Se0/2 MLP: Link oqueue dequeue, old txcount 0 Se0/2 MLP: Got pak 1, output Se0/2 Se0/2 MLP: Link oqueue dequeue, old txcount 0 Se0/0 MLP: Link oqueue dequeue, old txcount 0 Se0/2 MLP: Link oqueue dequeue, old txcount 0 Serial0/1(i): dlci 32(0x801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 44 Serial0/1(i): dlci 32(0x801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 52 Serial0/1(i): dlci 32(0x801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 52 Serial0/1(i): dlci 32(0x801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 56 Serial0/1(i): dlci 32(0x801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 52 Serial0/1(i): dlci 320(0x5001), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 56 Serial0/1(i): dlci 160(0x2801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 56 Serial0/1(i): dlci 96(0x1801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 56 Serial0/1(i): dlci 128(0x2001), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 56 Serial0/1(i): dlci 32(0x801), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 52 copy pkt, tmp-flags 0x280, idb-encsize 4 size 45 00:02:52: IP: s=217.118.192.110 (local), d=129.132.178.194 (Loopback0), len 76, sending 00:02:52: NTP: xmit packet to 129.132.178.194: 00:02:52: leap 3, mode 3, version 3, stratum 0, ppoll 64 00:02:52: rtdel (0.000), rtdsp 10001 (1000.015), refid (0.0.0.0) 00:02:52: ref . (01:00:00.000 CET Mon Jan 1 1900) 00:02:52: org . (01:00:00.000 CET Mon Jan 1 1900) 00:02:52: rec . (01:00:00.000 CET Mon Jan 1 1900) 00:02:52: xmt AF3BD12C.7D95B78D (01:02:52.490 CET Mon Mar 1 1993) 00:02:52: Se0/2 LCP: TIMEout: State REQsent 00:02:52: Se0/2 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 29 len 21 00:02:52: Se0/2 LCP:MagicNumber 0x07872A62 (0x050607872A62) 00:02:52: Se0/2 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:02:52: Se0/2 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x13070172656731) 00:02:52: DHCPD: checking for expired leases. 00:02:52: CDP-IP: Writing prefix 192.168.116.0/24 00:02:52: CDP-IP: Writing prefix 217.118.192.108/30 00:02:52: CDP-PA: version 2 packet sent out on FastEthernet0/0 00:02:52: CDP-IP: Writing prefix 192.168.116.0/24 00:02:52: CDP-IP: Writing prefix 217.118.192.108/30 00:02:52: CDP-PA: version 1 packet sent out on FastEthernet0/0 00:02:52: Serial0/2: attempting to restart 00:02:52: PowerQUICC(0/2): DCD is up. *** Thanks Roger . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Freesurf MX
not running 9:18: Trying to connect to all mailservers: smtp.freesurf.ch. - 194.230.0.8 [Could not connect: Could not receive data: Operation timed out.] Dominik Eichhorn wrote: Since some minutes ago, all seems to be back in its place: 220 freesurfmail.sunrise.ch ESMTP Service (6.0.055) ready Not yet a deja vue :-) Dominik At 08:52 24.10.03 +0200, you wrote: Hello the snowbirds! Since around midnight, we cannot send mail to freesurf.ch This is the response we get from freesurf.ch MX (still only 1): 421 freesurfmail.sunrise.ch Service not available - access denied Didn't we see that already 3 months ago? Is it the same everywhere ? Greets from the snowy (Zolliker-)mountain Dominik -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ __Dominik Eichhorn KSC WebEngineering GmbH - Stadelhoferstr. 40 - CH-8001 Zuerich Tel: +41-1-210-44-55 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +41-1-210-44-75 http://www.kscweb.ch/ __ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Freesurf MX
runns again... :) Trying to connect to all mailservers: smtp.freesurf.ch. - 194.230.0.8 [Successful connect: Got a good response [250 RCPT TO: OK]] Roger Guentensperger, Robert wrote: Hi, We get these mails. ;-) I passed them to our mail responsibles. I'll call them now. Cheers, Günti || -Original Message- || From: Viktor Steinmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:49 AM || To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Subject: Re: [swinog] Freesurf MX || || || Pascal: You assume, they get this mail... || || SCNR ;-) || || On Friday 24 October 2003 09:46, Pascal Gloor wrote: ||Same here, I've seen this at least 3 times in the last || two weeks, || || sometimes it took more than 12 hours until it was working again. || || Question for sunrise, is that an protection enabled || automaticly by the || server in case of large queue for example? Are you || getting flooded my || customers sending spam (trojan?) ? || || Pascal || || -- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: || http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ || -- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: || http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ || -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] some peers down
Hello we do have some problems with 3 peers. they won't come up if i clear bgp . somebody got the same status? 194.42.48.524 15398 91037 91078000 1d12hActive 194.42.48.674 1257 65469 62160000 01:30:25 Active 194.42.48.684 12654 89340 3253210000 6d13hActive cheers Roger . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Ride to Swinog7
Hi Folks I'll go to the Swinog7-Meeting. Is somebody using the train form Zurich at this morning? Maybe we can have a small inofficial BE-7.1/2-Event? Cheers Roger . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Need to re-think the standart internet access?
Hi Pascal and folks Pascal Gloor wrote: Hi folks, Considering those facts: - the growing number of worms and any other form of harmfull virus. - that IP is a powerfull tool. - the growing bandwidth usable for end-users. - the need for business customers to have stable and reliable internet access. Today we're perhaps offering our customer a too powerfull tool. Most (lets say 80 or 90%) of our mass customers only use smtp/pop3/imap/http/https. Is it still appropriate to give to mass customers ability to generate any kind of communication using IP? What about blocking TCP_SYN _TO_ dial/adsl (non-business) customers? Should we even think about blocking some kind of outgoing traffic? then you'll don't sell a free internet. what's about users use vpn to the office? some special ports like to use web-mail (Port e.g. 8383) and M$ Terminal-Services? and... other Q: what do you want to block? I'm not asking this on a technical point of view, but more on a philosophical point of view. That's ok, but we should kill the root. Ideas? Pascal Roger -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] e-mail blacklists / RBL etc..
Hello Steven. Steven Glogger wrote: hi all as you've seen in the news, there are some guys DDoS'ing some e-mail blackslists. it seems that the spammers are trying to kill all those services. so in the last few days/weeks these services went down: - blackholes.compu.net - monkeys.com - osirusoft etc. i still use these services: http://ordb.org/ http://www.spamcop.net/bl/ what do you use additionally? good experiences? we're using these Servers: http://www.into.ch/spam.php i've seen also that abuse.easynet.nl is offering such a service, or dsbl.org. bl.reynolds.net.au? You should not use xbl. this server will mark almost every e-mail. greetings steven __ Steven Glogger Technical Manager / Software Development Altrax AG Phone +41 1 256 81 11 Zähringerstrasse 24 Fax +41 1 256 81 12 Postfachmailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8025 Zürich http://www.altrax.com __ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0
A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote: Steven Glogger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17 Sep 2003: i'm not ready to patch only for verisign my dns server, therefore i will null route the stuff - even if i eliminate some vhosts which are running on their machine... exactly. All these solutions which have popped up recently are no more than hacks. The real solution would be to remove Verisign from the face of the earth. I don't care about the results of null-routing the IP address. i absoluteley agree with you. The problem is to solve at theyr roots, so bye verisign. Another possibility would be to install the IP address on a local box and put up your own sitefinder. customerfriendly idea. Sorry, you misstyped the url. and a small mailserver like all @mail - 0null: hehe so, what's up now? say thanks to verisign for the idea? hehe roger . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Rate-Limiting ICMP
Hello found on: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sn-20030820-nachi.shtml#policyrouting says: Warning: Microsoft Windows tracert utility uses 92 bytes sized ICMP packets. Using PBR to filter those packets will cause tracert utility not to work. Nachhi windows tracert's free... Roger Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Lukas Beeler wrote: * Fredy Kuenzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We seem to experience quite a bit of ICMP DOS attacks. The come along in waves, which makes some devices within our backbone stumble and loosing packets. DoS, or the well known nacchi worm? (Nacchi uses 92byte Packets exclusively, so it should be easy to sort that out) Seems to be. As ICMP should generally not be blocked, I'm thinking about rate limiting it on core routers. Any hints, links, suggestions? There was a discussion about this Topic just one or two Weeks ago on the nanog lists. Hmmm obviously missed it. Anyway, I installed the Cisco route-map recommendation on all Init Seven backbone doors: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sn-20030820-nachi.shtml#policyrouting and we see rather a lot of dropped packets: r3.tix#sh route-map nachi-worm route-map nachi-worm, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): 103 length 92 92 Set clauses: interface Null0 Policy routing matches: 96816 packets, 9381166 bytes (appx measured time 1/2h) Hope this helped. At least I7 is now nachi-free ;-) F. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Speed Reduce a FE-Port
hello swinogers is it possible to reduce the speed on an FE-Port of an Cisco 3662? bandwith 2048 doesen't work. we do have a Server, who is directly connected to a fe-port. we would reduce this bandwith/speed, let's say, to 2mb. is this possible with C3660? what will be the config? many thanks for help roger . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Swissonline mx problems?
Hello Some of our customers would send e-mails to swissonline.ch answer: mx.hispeed.ch. - 62.2.95.11 [Could not connect: Got an unknown RCPT TO response: 451 4.1.8 Possibly forged hostname for 69.2.200.182] Anyone got same answer? Rog Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] clock summer-time on Cisco?
Hello maybe we may add this line: router(config)#ntp server swisstime.ethz.ch greets Rog Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Hi all anyone a ready-to-go reasonable 'clock summer-time' config for Cisco? Thanks Fredy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- Für weitere Auskünfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] bgp up/down @ tix?
aha - got same here too... Roger Steven Glogger wrote: well, i have seen, that today (i mean yesterday) at 10:25 i saw that some sessions went down and came up. the other bgp sessions where up all the time. any problems on these ports? 194.42.48.4 4 8220 28915 17889 163533200 18:07:43 1716 194.42.48.6 4 8758 18233 17887 163532000 18:07:393 194.42.48.144 9177 17937 17887 163531700 18:07:05 29 194.42.48.164 13030 17917 17886 163531700 18:06:539 194.42.48.244 13250 17882 17888 163532100 18:07:331 194.42.48.264 8327 17926 17887 163535100 18:07:331 194.42.48.514 12350 35840 35765 163531700 18:08:32 24 194.42.48.574 12347 17903 17886 163532000 18:07:266 194.42.48.584 15169 35729 35765 163532000 18:07:392 194.42.48.614 21069 17886 17889 163531700 18:08:261 194.42.48.654 21040 17888 17890 163535100 18:08:191 194.42.48.664 21232 17896 17888 163533200 18:08:292 -steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Strange AS16221 Announce
Hello We do have some strange problem. we should announce 2 networks: 1. 217.118.192.0/20 2. 195.129.116./24 In our Router the bgp config says: router bgp 16221 no synchronization bgp router-id 217.118.192.109 bgp log-neighbor-changes bgp deterministic-med network 195.129.116.0 network 217.118.192.0 mask 255.255.240.0 what does your router see? only the 217.118.192.0/20? why not the 195.129.116.0/24? strange, strange... :( cheers Roger -- Fuer weitere Auskuenfte stehen wir Ihnen gerne jederzeit zur Verfuegung. Mit freundlichen Gruessen Roger Buchwalder Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was:Backbone PRO)
i got spam form backbone, but can't remebmer one ore more. but i didn't care, i put it directly to the :null0 i'll think about to stop peering too R Viktor Steinmann schrieb: We probably should all turn down peering session with Backbone Solutions to show them our gratitude for spamming. Are there other people on this list, which have been spammed by them? If it's only Fredy, then I'm not sure, if we can really call it spam. If it is spam, I will gladly stop peering with them... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: WAS: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants, IS: Call forBeer :)
try to ack :/ Steven Glogger schrieb: hi all involved. Unless it's unreasonably difficult to get larger facilities, why not just create sub-events? as already discussed privately with stony we could have a private 'meeting' for having a beer or something like that. so, i'm asking who is joining me while having a beer or something like that next Monday, 31th of March (1 Day before LI should work :)) in Zurich @ ZurichExpress-Bar (http://www.n-e-w-s.ch/) around 18:00 o'clock? greetings steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] ADSL and CPS on ISDN
a case for Wettbewerbsaufsichtsbehörde? - again? rog [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi all i just ordered a new ISDN Connection for my flat. So now you can only get ADSL from bluewin and without CPS? It's a great pity, that i have to order my ADSL at bluewin and i'm not able to connect to our company! http://www.pipeline.ch/adsl/swisscom.jpg regards candid -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] ADSL Featured on Kassensturz / SF1
can confirm on that: Ethernet:WAN: Status: 100M/Half Duplex Tx Pkts: 33458588 Line Status: Up Collisions: 0Rx Pkts: 37134532 Upstream Speed: 576 kbps CPU Load =5.78%Downstream Speed: 576 kbps Benoit Panizzon schrieb: I expect they will change profiles from 256/64k to 320/80k and so on, nobody telling anything. This is, as far as I understood from Peter Heinzmann@CNLAB (I was talking to him about 2 weeks ago) what Cablecom did. There is PPPoE overhead also with cable, right?! That's what they allready did with 'Enterprise' ADSL customers: a 512/512 connection on a ZyXEL 624 actualy reads: Ethernet:WAN: Status: 100M/Full Duplex Tx Pkts: 29204563 Line Status: Up Collisions: 0Rx Pkts: 29548594 Upstream Speed: 576 kbps CPU Load =3.40%Downstream Speed: 576 kbps -Benoit- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Size-Limitation of E-Mails :)
hehehe try to tell this to some secretary: i just write my 10-page letter in m$-word and then say file - Send to: they has of course many pictures :( cheers rog Viktor Steinmann schrieb: 10 Megs per Mail (after encoding) People should definitely learn to use FTP for larger files... :-) Viktor On Wednesday 19 February 2003 13:54, Steven Glogger wrote: just a question by my side: what is your maximum size of email? (had a discussion with people who have 2.5 or 5 meg limits) greetings steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Sperrverfuegungen - Anzeige wegen Datenbeschaedigung?
Matthias Geiser schrieb: [snip] check that: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Mike Pfaff wrote: Heute ist mir etwas interessantes eingefallen. Könnte man nicht die Provider, welche wegen der Sperrverfügungen Daten im DNS fälschen, wegen Datenbeschädigung anzeigen? IANAL, aber das duerfte wohl kaum gehen: Die Provider tun das wegen der Sperrverfuegung schliesslich nicht unbefugt, sondern eben befugt. Aber vielleicht geht's ja anders, z.B.: Art. 49 FMG [1]: Art. 49 Fälschen oder Unterdrücken von Informationen 1 Mit Gefängnis oder Busse wird bestraft, wer fernmeldedienstliche Aufgaben erfüllt und dabei: a. Informationen fälscht oder unterdrückt; b. jemandem Gelegenheit gibt, Informationen zu fälschen oder zu unterdrücken. 2 Wer eine mit fernmeldedienstlichen Aufgaben betraute Person durch Täuschung veranlasst, Informationen zu fälschen oder zu unterdrücken, wird mit Gefängnis oder mit Busse bestraft. oder auch: Art. 16 BV [2]: Art. 16 Meinungs- und Informationsfreiheit 1 Die Meinungs- und Informationsfreiheit ist gewährleistet. 2 Jede Person hat das Recht, ihre Meinung frei zu bilden und sie ungehindert zu äussern und zu verbreiten. 3 Jede Person hat das Recht, Informationen frei zu empfangen, aus allgemein zugänglichen Quellen zu beschaffen und zu verbreiten. V.a. Abs. 3. Vielleicht argumentiert ja bereits der VIT so? - Felix [1] http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/784_10/a49.html [2] http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/101/a16.html -- Felix Rauch, research assistant at laboratory for computersystems, ETH Zuerich http://www.nice.ch/~felix/ Member of Swiss Internet User Group: www.siug.ch This article contains my personal view only! Use of my addresses for marketing purposes is hereby strictly prohibited according to swiss privacy laws. ___ siug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://your.trash.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/siug-discuss Dies ist eine oeffentliche Mailingliste. Die einzelnen Beitraege widerspiegeln die Meinung des Autors und nicht unbedingt diejenige der SIUG. . . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Swisscom Copper lines still available?
Hi Anthony There are two different types of lines (for swisscom) 1. copper 2-wire = MC2 copper 4-wire = MC4 2. National Leased Lines Copper are only avaiable in the Range of the same Telefonzentrale It is not possible to go over two or more PBX-Points (sorry, my interpretation) That means, if you would like to have a copperline from Zurich Main Station to Buerkliplatz you'll have to use a National Leased Line, becaouse it will (for shure) go over more then one Zentrale. Same is, if you'll go over 2 different Gemeinden. Hope, that helps Greez Rog A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote: Hello, Does anyone know of a contact person within Swisscom to order copper lines in Zurich? The Swisscom call center thinks this service doesn't exist any more... -anthony -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] www.swiss-corruption.com
wow! the webmaster put me in a blacklist: Sorry, this page is not available to the group of your IP-address nice, isn't it? maybe the webmasters in the entire world should do that for all IP's who comes from switzerland? greez r Roger Buchwalder wrote: http://www.c9c.net/swiss-corruption/info/: Le site de notre client www.swiss-corruption.com fait objèt de mesures nationales de pire censure politique et de répression arbitraire, de la part dune fonctionnaire de province de l Etat Suisse, sans pour autant quun jugement de dernière instance dun tribunal correct, équitable et impartial ait eu lieu. aha, a webmaster has done something. maybe we should say that this way is the better way to ms Untersuchungsrichterin? Pascal Gloor wrote: www.swiss-corruption.com already moved to http://www.c9c.net/swiss-corruption/info will the judge ask us to close the internet? :-P P. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ . -- -- Internet Online AG Adlikerstr. 290 8105 Regensdorf Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +41 1 871 40 70 fax +41 1 871 40 80 . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] UUNet AS Path
Hello I'm wondering what GASP will tell me. through uunet will go only traffic to Swisscom, Sunrise, Orange and WCom AS'es. The rest will go through other Transit-links. That this is true, we could see, that MRTG says the same: almost no traffic by UUnet/WCom. Do you have the same traffic/AS-Paht's/... phenomenia? i allready called to the WCOM-Support. i'm just wondering what it is. Thanks ROger . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
