Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-26 Thread Stephan Knauss

On 23.03.2015 21:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:


2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
mailto:o...@stephans-server.de:

The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used
when exact details of the operator are not known, other than that
they are a small independent firm.
Sounds like that's exactly what we are looking for.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Tag:operator%__3Dindependent
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:operator%3Dindependent

no, I think he wants a tag that says: this petrol station is not
associated with one of the big mineral oil companies. The proposed tag
operator=independent is a hack by putting something different than an
operator into the operator value, IMHO nothing we should encourage, and
this information will be lost as soon as someone adds a proper operator
to the POI.


That given wiki page is quite new. And operator=independent not that 
much in use. Maybe get rid of that wiki page then and replace the 
tagging with something more appropriate?


Stephan


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-26 Thread John F. Eldredge
If the business sells small quantities of fuel (automotive or otherwise), but 
not car parts, then in what sense does shop=car_parts apply? Fuel is not part 
of the car.


On March 23, 2015 8:55:57 AM CDT, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
 On 23.03.2015 11:02, Dave Swarthout wrote:
  An amenity is something the /general public/ might like or use or
 want to
  visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell small
  quantities of fuel, usually 2 or 3 liters, to local motorcycle
 drivers.
 
 That's why the general public might like to visit these shops - or any
 other
 fuel station.
 
 Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but
 rather a
 shop=car_parts. Anyway, we don't need to invent a new tag.
 
  And
  the Wiki's definition of shop is: A place selling retail products
 or
  services.  Too brief perhaps but it does allow for a wide range of
 additions.
 
 Cafes, restaurants and theaters sell retail products or services as
 well.
 You can use either of the amenity=* or shop=* keys, you just need to
 stick
 to it.
 
  Meanwhile, until the renderers get smart, people are going to travel
 to
  these shops hoping to fill up their SUVs. This is exactly what I'm
 trying to
  avoid. I do not see why there is so much resistance to adding
 another value
  to the shop keys in existence. There are some pretty strange special
 values
  out there:
  shop=bag
  shop=e-cigarette
  shop=fashion  (??)
 
 One evil cannot justify another evil. I never set the shop=fashion
 tag,
 because it's just a useless synonym for shop=clothes.
 
 -- 
 Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
 Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive 
out hate; only love can do that. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread John Willis
If it is a place to buy 50l of petrol with a credit card, and 200 people can 
use it a day, it's a Normal gas station. If you hand the card to a clerk or pay 
at the pump (almost every single gas station in America, and more and more in 
Japan) - it's still a gas station. 

I don't think people would expect a shop that looks like a gas station, works 
like a gas station, and has no shop to shop in to be tagged as a shop. 

I totally get its an automated system (for payment) but the facility itself is 
a normal gas station. 

The other state with mandatory gas station pumping is New Jersey. 

It's weird going to certain gas stations in Japan where the pumps are 5 meters 
in the air, and an attendant lowers the hose down with a string to pump gas in 
your car. 

Javbw


On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:

 How does the tagging differ from an unstaffed filling station where you 
 enter your credit card and fill up the tank of your car yourself 24/7 like I 
 seem them all over the place in the Netherlands? In the situation you 
 describe I really prefer shop=*.
 
 Regards,
 
 Jan 
 
 At these places you could fill up your SUV tank and hence they are tagged 
 appropriately. I add:
 
 amenity=fuel
 automated=yes
 description:en=A vending machine accepting cash in notes and/or coin that 
 dispenses automotive fuel 24/7. Most are poorly marked and offer no other 
 services.
 fuel:diesel=yes/no
 fuel:gasohol_91=yes/no
 fuel:gasohol_95=yes/no
 fuel:gasoline_91=yes/no
 fuel:gasoline_95=yes/no
 name=*
 opening_hours=24/7
 payment:cash=yes
 payment:credit_cards=no
 source=GPS, geolocated photo
 vending=fuel
 vending_machine=yes
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-24 11:28 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:

 There's no need to remove it since it's clearly understood by most people
 to mean tools, custom items, maybe even tickets to an auto show.



IMHO the only valid word there is car parts, because if they don't have
car parts but they sell tickets to an auto show, you wouldn't tag that
shop=car_parts.



 So, while these observations are interesting, let's put them aside and
 discuss the issue of shop=car_parts some other day.



OK ;-)

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Dave Swarthout
There's no need to remove it since it's clearly understood by most people
to mean tools, custom items, maybe even tickets to an auto show.

Motor oil is sold at a car_parts shop because it is non-volatile and
therefore poses no fire or explosion risk. This is emphatically not the
case with gasoline and its relatives. Plus, a significant profit can accrue
from its sale.

So, while these observations are interesting, let's put them aside and
discuss the issue of shop=car_parts some other day.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
 wrote:


 2015-03-23 18:48 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil.
 Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same group
 of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What else
 is
 the etc. supposed to mean?



 I think that the etc. is indeed not helpful and I'd remove it from this
 list. Also motor oil is not a car part in my understanding, but it is
 typically found in shops that sell car parts, so this is why it got its way
 onto this list. But petrol is not on this list, is not a car part, and so
 these places should not be tagged like that IMHO. Mineral oil (I think you
 meant to say crude oil) is the basis for lots of things, including
 plastic (e.g. also textiles), tar, lighter fuel, even coke. Now shops for
 car parts do indeed sell textiles, so the circle closes here.

 Cheers,
 Martin

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 18:48 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil.
 Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same group
 of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What else is
 the etc. supposed to mean?



I think that the etc. is indeed not helpful and I'd remove it from this
list. Also motor oil is not a car part in my understanding, but it is
typically found in shops that sell car parts, so this is why it got its way
onto this list. But petrol is not on this list, is not a car part, and so
these places should not be tagged like that IMHO. Mineral oil (I think you
meant to say crude oil) is the basis for lots of things, including
plastic (e.g. also textiles), tar, lighter fuel, even coke. Now shops for
car parts do indeed sell textiles, so the circle closes here.

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Dave Swarthout
It's interesting that you brought that up because most fuel stations in the
United States actually use vending machines as well. AFAIK, the only state
in the United States that still requires an attendant to pump your gas is
Oregon. In a way, even though the fuel shops I'm dealing with in Thailand
are much smaller, having only 1 or 2 pumps and no parking pad or other
amenities, the majority of the large name-brand stations in the U.S. could
really use the same tags. They're all automated, accept credit cards, open
24/7, etc. I would of course, add brand, operator, and other descriptive
tags but essentially they are the same thing.

Dave

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com
wrote:

 How does the tagging differ from an unstaffed filling station where you
 enter your credit card and fill up the tank of your car yourself 24/7 like
 I seem them all over the place in the Netherlands? In the situation you
 describe I really prefer shop=*.


 Regards,

 Jan


 At these places you could fill up your SUV tank and hence they are tagged
 appropriately. I add:

 amenity=fuel
 automated=yes
 description:en=A vending machine accepting cash in notes and/or coin that
 dispenses automotive fuel 24/7. Most are poorly marked and offer no other
 services.
 fuel:diesel=yes/no
 fuel:gasohol_91=yes/no
 fuel:gasohol_95=yes/no
 fuel:gasoline_91=yes/no
 fuel:gasoline_95=yes/no
 name=*
 opening_hours=24/7
 payment:cash=yes
 payment:credit_cards=no
 source=GPS, geolocated photo
 vending=fuel
 vending_machine=yes





-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Jan van Bekkum
+5
I fully agree with Dave! We need a clear differentiation between regular
filling stations with large underground containers and the shops that sell
a few liters of diesel of which you may hope that it isn't polluted and
doesn't contain water.

When I travel in countries like Malawi or Ethiopia I try to plan fuelling
in such a way that I can use normal fillings stations. I don't care so
much about the brand or the roof, but large quantities and protection
against manipulation are important. The shops I only use in emergencies.
So please use amenity=fuel for regular filling stations and extend the
existing shop=fuel with attributes to specify what fuekl is sold.


On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:


 On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:

 I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed).


 This is not the way to go.

 An amenity is something the *general public* might like or use or want to
 visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell small
 quantities of fuel, usually 2 or 3 liters, to local motorcycle drivers. And
 the Wiki's definition of shop is: A place selling retail products or
 services.  Too brief perhaps but it does allow for a wide range of
 additions.

 Meanwhile, until the renderers get smart, people are going to travel to
 these shops hoping to fill up their SUVs. This is exactly what I'm trying
 to avoid. I do not see why there is so much resistance to adding another
 value to the shop keys in existence. There are some pretty strange special
 values out there:
 shop=bag
 shop=e-cigarette
 shop=fashion  (??)

 What the hell does a fashion shop sell? Fashion of course. I wonder when
 the renderers will decide to deal with bag shops?


 Dave


  ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Stephan Knauss

On 22.03.2015 20:29, fly wrote:

some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use
these as their brand, see e.g. here:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_freier_Tankstellen
So it is a brand. Maybe just small, but a brand of that association of 
fuel stations.



not being part of a mineral oil corporation doesn't necessarily mean you
don't use a brand name.


So, we need an additional tag for independent shops/petrol stations as
brand=* and operator=* might be already used.
Do we need company_chain=* or does independent=yes work ?


The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used 
when exact details of the operator are not known, other than that they 
are a small independent firm.

Sounds like that's exactly what we are looking for.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:operator%3Dindependent

Stephan


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 23.03.2015 15:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at
 mailto:b...@volki.at:
 
 Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but 
 rather a
 shop=car_parts.
 
 
 
 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.

The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor
oil, car chemicals, etc.

That fits perfectly.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
Sorry, fuel is not a car_part. And these small fuel shops are not an
amenity.

Stalemate.

@Fly - these places are operated by private individuals out of the front of
their homes primarily. It's typically a small shed with a large window thru
which the fuel is either pumped or handed over in repurposed whiskey
bottles. It barely qualifies as a shop but I want a way to make them
visible and useful for those who need them. The local Thai farmers ain't
gonna use OSM to find them. And I'm not gonna stop and interview them to
get their names.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
 wrote:


 2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but
 rather a
 shop=car_parts.



 I'd prefer shop=pharmacy, dispensing=no ;-)

 Cheers,
 Martin

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de:

 The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used when
 exact details of the operator are not known, other than that they are a
 small independent firm.
 Sounds like that's exactly what we are looking for.

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:operator%3Dindependent



no, I think he wants a tag that says: this petrol station is not
associated with one of the big mineral oil companies. The proposed tag
operator=independent is a hack by putting something different than an
operator into the operator value, IMHO nothing we should encourage, and
this information will be lost as soon as someone adds a proper operator to
the POI.

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
I don't object to the operator=independent tag. That's an okay addition to
the scenario. However, I do object to tagging these things as amenities.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Sorry, fuel is not a car_part. And these small fuel shops are not an
 amenity.

 Stalemate.

 @Fly - these places are operated by private individuals out of the front
 of their homes primarily. It's typically a small shed with a large window
 thru which the fuel is either pumped or handed over in repurposed whiskey
 bottles. It barely qualifies as a shop but I want a way to make them
 visible and useful for those who need them. The local Thai farmers ain't
 gonna use OSM to find them. And I'm not gonna stop and interview them to
 get their names.

 On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer 
 dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:


 2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but
 rather a
 shop=car_parts.



 I'd prefer shop=pharmacy, dispensing=no ;-)

 Cheers,
 Martin

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




 --
 Dave Swarthout
 Homer, Alaska
 Chiang Mai, Thailand
 Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 15:30 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

  2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.

 The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor
 oil, car chemicals, etc.

 That fits perfectly.



can you expand? Someone sitting roadside selling just a few liters of
petrol, how does he comply with this definition? Petrol is not in the list,
it is neither auto parts nor auto accessories nor motor oil nor car
chemicals. Are you after the etc.?


Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread fly
Am 23.03.2015 um 07:02 schrieb johnw:
 
 On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

 You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing 
 values and it should be fine.
 I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene.
 
 
 The wiki entry is uneditable - I’ve edited quite a few wiki pages now, so I’m 
 used to going to the edit tab and seeing the text  markup in the text box to 
 edit, but  there’s only a snippet for the top of the page - the table is not 
 there to be edited (yes, I’m attempting to edit the whole page, so it should 
 be there). 
 
 I’ve never seen an error like this before. 

Please, always include a link.

Guess you are looking for the template page of fuel types [1].


By the way, thought we use operator=* instead of tenant=*. What is the
difference or is it something we need to clean up [2] ?  Does tenant=*
with only little more than 400 appearances according to taginfo [3]
really deserve an own wiki page [4] ?

Cheers fly


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Fuel_types
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#Names
[3] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=tenant
[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atenant

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 23.03.2015 11:02, Dave Swarthout wrote:
 An amenity is something the /general public/ might like or use or want to
 visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell small
 quantities of fuel, usually 2 or 3 liters, to local motorcycle drivers.

That's why the general public might like to visit these shops - or any other
fuel station.

Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but rather a
shop=car_parts. Anyway, we don't need to invent a new tag.

 And
 the Wiki's definition of shop is: A place selling retail products or
 services.  Too brief perhaps but it does allow for a wide range of additions.

Cafes, restaurants and theaters sell retail products or services as well.
You can use either of the amenity=* or shop=* keys, you just need to stick
to it.

 Meanwhile, until the renderers get smart, people are going to travel to
 these shops hoping to fill up their SUVs. This is exactly what I'm trying to
 avoid. I do not see why there is so much resistance to adding another value
 to the shop keys in existence. There are some pretty strange special values
 out there:
 shop=bag
 shop=e-cigarette
 shop=fashion  (??)

One evil cannot justify another evil. I never set the shop=fashion tag,
because it's just a useless synonym for shop=clothes.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but rather
 a
 shop=car_parts.



2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but rather
 a
 shop=car_parts.



I'd prefer shop=pharmacy, dispensing=no ;-)

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Stephan Knauss

On 23.03.2015 14:50, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:

 amenity=fuel
 fuel=bottled
Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station.


That's fine, because selling fuel is what makes it a fuel station.


You have missed the point of this thread. The world is not perfect. 
amenity=fuel is broken. It is so much established as a tag for proper 
fuel stations for cars that it's utopic to expect the tagging to change 
and people know to tag and evaluate sub-tags.


I like the idea of shop=fuel and sub-tags because it gives us the 
opportunity to make it better this time.


Legacy software and rendering still works. also legacy tagging of 
amenity=fuel still works.
But we can add advanced tagging of the fuel-types to get more (and more 
detailed) information to the database.


Exactly the small places in Asia and Africa selling fuel from bottles. 
Or the places in Japan selling kerosene for heating. Or shops sellign 
firewood and coal. Or shops selling small amounts of fuel for 
sport/fishing boats near lakes.


Stephan


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread fly
Am 23.03.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
 2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de:
 
 The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used when
 exact details of the operator are not known, other than that they are a
 small independent firm.
 Sounds like that's exactly what we are looking for.

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:operator%3Dindependent

 
 
 no, I think he wants a tag that says: this petrol station is not
 associated with one of the big mineral oil companies. The proposed tag
 operator=independent is a hack by putting something different than an
 operator into the operator value, IMHO nothing we should encourage, and
 this information will be lost as soon as someone adds a proper operator to
 the POI.

Yeah, the value of operator is a string and there might exist some
person or brand/company call Independent.

There will be always an operator so operator=independent does not work
for two reasons.

We need an additional tag for independent fuel stations. This tag is
useful for several shops aswell.

chain_independent=yes ?

Sorry, my English is AE influenced and not my mother tong, so I have
some difficulties to find some proper words.

cu fly


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 11:02 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:

 I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed).


 This is not the way to go.

 An amenity is something the *general public* might like or use or want to
 visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell small
 quantities of fuel, usually 2 or 3 liters, to local motorcycle drivers. And
 the Wiki's definition of shop is: A place selling retail products or
 services.  Too brief perhaps but it does allow for a wide range of
 additions.

 Meanwhile, until the renderers get smart, people are going to travel to
 these shops hoping to fill up their SUVs. This is exactly what I'm trying
 to avoid. I do not see why there is so much resistance to adding another
 value to the shop keys in existence.



completely agree, this is NOT something that should be done with subtagging.

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread johnw

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing 
 values and it should be fine.
 I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene.


The wiki entry is uneditable - I’ve edited quite a few wiki pages now, so I’m 
used to going to the edit tab and seeing the text  markup in the text box to 
edit, but  there’s only a snippet for the top of the page - the table is not 
there to be edited (yes, I’m attempting to edit the whole page, so it should be 
there). 

I’ve never seen an error like this before. 

Javbw ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Jan van Bekkum

 How does the tagging differ from an unstaffed filling station where you
 enter your credit card and fill up the tank of your car yourself 24/7 like
 I seem them all over the place in the Netherlands? In the situation you
 describe I really prefer shop=*.


Regards,

Jan


 At these places you could fill up your SUV tank and hence they are tagged
 appropriately. I add:

 amenity=fuel
 automated=yes
 description:en=A vending machine accepting cash in notes and/or coin that
 dispenses automotive fuel 24/7. Most are poorly marked and offer no other
 services.
 fuel:diesel=yes/no
 fuel:gasohol_91=yes/no
 fuel:gasohol_95=yes/no
 fuel:gasoline_91=yes/no
 fuel:gasoline_95=yes/no
 name=*
 opening_hours=24/7
 payment:cash=yes
 payment:credit_cards=no
 source=GPS, geolocated photo
 vending=fuel
 vending_machine=yes



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
 2015-03-23 11:02 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
 I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed).

 This is not the way to go.

 An amenity is something the general public might like or use or want to
 visit. These little shops are definitely not that.

+1 here.  Tagging these as amenity=fuel violates the human expectation for
what a fuel shop is.
Especially if rendered, it degrades the value of the existing mapping, by
making OSM feel unreliable.
This is similar to tagging undrinkable drinking water, toilets that can't
be used, or a roadside strawberry stand as a convenience store in order to
get it render.  It makes it harder to find proper fuel on the map.

shop=fuel is semantically good, but almost certain to be confused with
amenity=fuel.

These stands are also far more volatile than a proper fuel station.  And
once they cease business
very hard to un-map.  With a proper fuel station you can hope to eventually
remove stale data via high resolution imagery.
With the* amenity=neighborhood_fuel_vendor* you have no chance of armchair
mapping it away.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 20.03.2015 00:48, Warin wrote:
 On 20/03/2015 9:39 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
 mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:

 amenity=fuel
 fuel=bottled


 Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station.

That's fine, because selling fuel is what makes it a fuel station.

 fuel=bottled in addition would create some confusion if the fuel was in a
 drum with a pump.

 
 Rendering can change.. if there is enough need. For example some renders
 look for;
  the surface tag to render roads that are unpaved differently from those
 that are paved.
 the tags for bicycle use to determine if paths, footways are available for
 bicycle use..
 
 
 
 As I said
 
 the key fuel= is in use to distinguish the type of fuel .. CNG, diesel,
 petrol, kero etc. Not for the dispensing method.
 
 amenity=fuel
 
 and possibly
 dispenser= bottle, drum, pump (where pump is what Australians call a
 'bowser' .. and what is presently used to render amenity=fuel)
 
 or
 fuel:storage=bottle, drum,tank. Needs words to describe there things,
 particularly that the 'tank' is much larger than the drum.

I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed).

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:

 I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed).


This is not the way to go.

An amenity is something the *general public* might like or use or want to
visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell small
quantities of fuel, usually 2 or 3 liters, to local motorcycle drivers. And
the Wiki's definition of shop is: A place selling retail products or
services.  Too brief perhaps but it does allow for a wide range of
additions.

Meanwhile, until the renderers get smart, people are going to travel to
these shops hoping to fill up their SUVs. This is exactly what I'm trying
to avoid. I do not see why there is so much resistance to adding another
value to the shop keys in existence. There are some pretty strange special
values out there:
shop=bag
shop=e-cigarette
shop=fashion  (??)

What the hell does a fashion shop sell? Fashion of course. I wonder when
the renderers will decide to deal with bag shops?


Dave
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread John Willis


Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
 
 On 23.03.2015 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.
 
The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor
oil, car chemicals, etc.
 
That fits perfectly.
 
 can you expand? Someone sitting roadside selling just a few liters of
 petrol, how does he comply with this definition? Petrol is not in the list,
 it is neither auto parts nor auto accessories nor motor oil nor car
 chemicals. Are you after the etc.?
 
 Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil.
 Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same group
 of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What else is
 the etc. supposed to mean?
 


Just because they are both made from oil, and sold in similar quantities does 
not make the amenity or shop similar. 

This is about people's expectations.  

A toilet and a drinking fountain both involve fixtures that use water, yet 
tagged separately. Same with water point, tap, bidet, and other water based 
amenities - because people's *expectations* of what is present would be broken 
if I tagged a drinking fountain as a tap or toilet. 

That's the point of this is discussion.

If I saw a car parts icon listed in Africa, and I need to get parts for vehicle 
( even a single can of motor oil) - and I went to one of these shops, and there 
was an old lady selling gasoline for scooters in whiskey bottles out of a 
window in their house, I'd think the tagger had lost their mind and delete the 
shop. Similarly - if the tagger tagged this as a gas station, I'd think they 
are joking. 

I don't tag granny's roadside vegetable stand as a market nor distribution 
warehouse - but that is the same thing you are suggesting - but in some places 
it might be a permanent and expected way for some people to get vegetables - so 
how do I tag it? Do I pollute market when it is a table with 10 green onions 
and a few eggplants? They are a farmer, so is it food distribution?  Neither 
works, so a new solution should be found (for this example). 


Go look at my kerosene tagging example, and tell me what tag you would put on a 
gas station that doesn't actually sell gasoline or any fuel for cars. Should 
you like to further dilute petrol station tagging and include those too? 

If I see a gas pump icon, and thanks to the renders and data users, I would see 
a gas pump icon in both cases, it would make me very pissed to show up there 
with a car expecting 50L of gasoline.
That's what we're trying to avoid.

Javbw 


 -- 
 Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
 Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 23.03.2015 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
  2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.
 
 The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor
 oil, car chemicals, etc.
 
 That fits perfectly.
 
 can you expand? Someone sitting roadside selling just a few liters of
 petrol, how does he comply with this definition? Petrol is not in the list,
 it is neither auto parts nor auto accessories nor motor oil nor car
 chemicals. Are you after the etc.?

Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil.
Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same group
of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What else is
the etc. supposed to mean?

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
I agree completely with what John said in the previous reply.

Repeat: a fuel shop is not a car_parts shop. The etc. was probably added
there as a catch all to include tools specific to cars or whatever but it
definitely, certainly does not include petrol.

Dave


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:37 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:



 Sent from my iPhone

  On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
 
  On 23.03.2015 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
  2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.
 
 The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories,
 motor
 oil, car chemicals, etc.
 
 That fits perfectly.
 
  can you expand? Someone sitting roadside selling just a few liters of
  petrol, how does he comply with this definition? Petrol is not in the
 list,
  it is neither auto parts nor auto accessories nor motor oil nor car
  chemicals. Are you after the etc.?
 
  Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil.
  Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same
 group
  of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What else
 is
  the etc. supposed to mean?
 


 Just because they are both made from oil, and sold in similar quantities
 does not make the amenity or shop similar.

 This is about people's expectations.

 A toilet and a drinking fountain both involve fixtures that use water, yet
 tagged separately. Same with water point, tap, bidet, and other water based
 amenities - because people's *expectations* of what is present would be
 broken if I tagged a drinking fountain as a tap or toilet.

 That's the point of this is discussion.

 If I saw a car parts icon listed in Africa, and I need to get parts for
 vehicle ( even a single can of motor oil) - and I went to one of these
 shops, and there was an old lady selling gasoline for scooters in whiskey
 bottles out of a window in their house, I'd think the tagger had lost their
 mind and delete the shop. Similarly - if the tagger tagged this as a gas
 station, I'd think they are joking.

 I don't tag granny's roadside vegetable stand as a market nor distribution
 warehouse - but that is the same thing you are suggesting - but in some
 places it might be a permanent and expected way for some people to get
 vegetables - so how do I tag it? Do I pollute market when it is a table
 with 10 green onions and a few eggplants? They are a farmer, so is it food
 distribution?  Neither works, so a new solution should be found (for this
 example).


 Go look at my kerosene tagging example, and tell me what tag you would put
 on a gas station that doesn't actually sell gasoline or any fuel for cars.
 Should you like to further dilute petrol station tagging and include those
 too?

 If I see a gas pump icon, and thanks to the renders and data users, I
 would see a gas pump icon in both cases, it would make me very pissed to
 show up there with a car expecting 50L of gasoline.
 That's what we're trying to avoid.

 Javbw


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
Also, Bryce makes this point, a valid point I must add:

These stands are also far more volatile than a proper fuel station.  And
once they cease business
very hard to un-map.

That's true but it's also true of many other objects. Mapping the world is
a dynamic endeavor because things change: roads are built, railroads are
converted into bike paths, construction=yes becomes building=yes.

Here in Thailand, many small fuel shops now feature vending machines to
dispense gasoline and are often open 24/7. I believe the shops we're
talking about here will eventually be replaced by these. I'm tagging those
as amenity=fuel with other tags to fine tune the situation. See the Wiki
under amenity=vending_machine
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine
There is a bigger photo of this new fueling point here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Vending_machine_for_motor_fuel,_Thailand.jpg
.

At these places you could fill up your SUV tank and hence they are tagged
appropriately. I add:

amenity=fuel
automated=yes
description:en=A vending machine accepting cash in notes and/or coin that
dispenses automotive fuel 24/7. Most are poorly marked and offer no other
services.
fuel:diesel=yes/no
fuel:gasohol_91=yes/no
fuel:gasohol_95=yes/no
fuel:gasoline_91=yes/no
fuel:gasoline_95=yes/no
name=*
opening_hours=24/7
payment:cash=yes
payment:credit_cards=no
source=GPS, geolocated photo
vending=fuel
vending_machine=yes

In the 5 years I've been motorcycling around Thailand I'm seeing more and
more of these. But the other type, the shops we're working with now, will
likely be around for many years. They should be mapped in some meaningful,
and useful, way.


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I agree completely with what John said in the previous reply.

 Repeat: a fuel shop is not a car_parts shop. The etc. was probably added
 there as a catch all to include tools specific to cars or whatever but it
 definitely, certainly does not include petrol.

 Dave



 On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:37 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:



 Sent from my iPhone

  On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
 
  On 23.03.2015 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
  2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts.
 
 The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories,
 motor
 oil, car chemicals, etc.
 
 That fits perfectly.
 
  can you expand? Someone sitting roadside selling just a few liters of
  petrol, how does he comply with this definition? Petrol is not in the
 list,
  it is neither auto parts nor auto accessories nor motor oil nor car
  chemicals. Are you after the etc.?
 
  Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil.
  Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same
 group
  of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What
 else is
  the etc. supposed to mean?
 


 Just because they are both made from oil, and sold in similar quantities
 does not make the amenity or shop similar.

 This is about people's expectations.

 A toilet and a drinking fountain both involve fixtures that use water,
 yet tagged separately. Same with water point, tap, bidet, and other water
 based amenities - because people's *expectations* of what is present would
 be broken if I tagged a drinking fountain as a tap or toilet.

 That's the point of this is discussion.

 If I saw a car parts icon listed in Africa, and I need to get parts for
 vehicle ( even a single can of motor oil) - and I went to one of these
 shops, and there was an old lady selling gasoline for scooters in whiskey
 bottles out of a window in their house, I'd think the tagger had lost their
 mind and delete the shop. Similarly - if the tagger tagged this as a gas
 station, I'd think they are joking.

 I don't tag granny's roadside vegetable stand as a market nor
 distribution warehouse - but that is the same thing you are suggesting -
 but in some places it might be a permanent and expected way for some people
 to get vegetables - so how do I tag it? Do I pollute market when it is a
 table with 10 green onions and a few eggplants? They are a farmer, so is it
 food distribution?  Neither works, so a new solution should be found (for
 this example).


 Go look at my kerosene tagging example, and tell me what tag you would
 put on a gas station that doesn't actually sell gasoline or any fuel for
 cars. Should you like to further dilute petrol station tagging and include
 those too?

 If I see a gas pump icon, and thanks to the renders and data users, I
 would see a gas pump icon in both cases, it would make me very pissed to
 show up there with a car expecting 50L of gasoline.
 That's what we're trying to avoid.

 Javbw




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread John Willis


Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 n the 5 years I've been motorcycling around Thailand I'm seeing more and more 
 of these. But the other type, the shops we're working with now, will likely 
 be around for many years. They should be mapped in some meaningful, and 
 useful, way

+1 

The same roadside tables under a tarp have been there for 10 years selling 
cucumbers and seasonal vegetables. There are tomato, egg, and vegetable 
machines here that are over 30 years old, my wives occasionally buys eggs from 
one for the past 20 years. 

These somewhat informal, yet persistent shops deserve a spot, but they should 
not pollute the tags others expect to find on a more traditional and larger 
shop. 

Javbw 
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread johnw

 On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The etc. was probably added there as a catch all to include tools specific 
 to cars or whatever but it definitely, certainly does not include petrol. 


Car stores sell all the aftermarket stuff for cars (besides tools and parts) 
interior accessories, entertainment  GPS stuff, towing rigs, roof racks, and 
other modifications for cars, along with cleaning accessories and things for 
tires. They’ll have perfromance additives for fuels as well - but no real fuel. 

yea, Gasoline is not on that list.   


Javbw___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread fly
Am 19.03.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
 2015-03-19 17:12 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
 
 brand=none or
 no_brand=yes to proper mark the independence.

 some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use
 these as their brand, see e.g. here:
 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_freier_Tankstellen
 not being part of a mineral oil corporation doesn't necessarily mean you
 don't use a brand name.

So, we need an additional tag for independent shops/petrol stations as
brand=* and operator=* might be already used.

Do we need company_chain=* or does independent=yes work ?

cu

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Paul Johnson
Argh, let's not invent yet another amenity type for this.  Why not tag for
the dispenser type?  Then you'd still be able to find fuel as an amenity
(which is better than nothing if you don't get your preferred dispenser
type in most cases) but you could, say, filter for only fuel amenities that
have, say, a fuel pump.  Might also consider tagging for type of fuel pump
since it seems my generation struggles with pumps older than roughly the
middle 1990s, and would be completely lost at a gravity feed pump with a
glass globe if they've never before traveled parts of western Canada where
these are still in common use (it seems PetroCanada is spendthrift to a
fault at times)...

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:

 amenity=bottled_motor_fuel
 phone= (because many have mobile phones)
 name= (name of individual proprietor)

 It has the same fuzzy border as supermarket vs. convenience.


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

  I've come across regular filling stations without a roof. Somewhere in
 Scotland.. on a Sunday .. no one there but a credit card reader so I could
 get fuel.

 Others in Australia .. White Cliffs,  Warburton, Docker River, Laverton, 
 Carnegie Station and many others.
 The existence of a roof does not identify a 'regular filling station' to me.

 Same, though my case was on the job.  There's a lot of filling stations in
Oklahoma and Kansas, particularly in less traveled and/or more arid
regions, that don't have a roof (and often don't have highway facing price
signage, or if it does, it's old enough that it predates prices exceeding a
dollar; in either case, if you need to ask how much gas is, you don't need
gas that bad).  This last winter saw a lot of water lines burst in Tulsa
and Oklahoma City, which if the break happened near a gas station, it
probably flooded the roof to the point of structural collapse.  In the case
of independent stations (or some of the less common, smaller brands like
Marathon or Sunoco), the station reopened as soon as the wreckage of the
old roof was removed, and there's no plans to rebuild the roof.

Tangent: I know there's a number of these in Tulsa and I've not mapped
these yet mostly out of situational blindness, as I'm strongly inclined to
shop for gas exclusively on price first and availability of what I want for
lunch or breakfast, which generally means I'm stopping at QuikTrip (one
could really seriously detail map these with bike parking, car parking,
restrooms, as a fast food amenity (if it's also a QT Kitchens location),
air compressor, truck parking (at the larger ones), etc, and often have
more to offer than some small town grocery stores.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread johnw

 On Mar 23, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  
 Nobody's proposing another amenity tag. My thrust here is to gather opinions 
 about adding another shop key, this one a shop for petrol (gas, gasohol, 
 etc.). The places I have in mind are not the same as standard fueling places, 
 tagged amenity=fuel, in fact, I wish them to be tagged differently so the two 
 types are not confused. They're much smaller and offer no other services or 
 amenities whatsoever.

+1 

Yep - non-standard places to buy gas, possibly not gas for a car. basically not 
a “Gas station”.  

For some fuel types, it isn’t even for cars…

I want to tag permanent kerosene dispensaries  (for heaters), but I don’t want 
them confused with gas stations - though they use similar equipment. 

Some people want to tag informal/ad hoc/ low volume gasoline dispensaries that 
do not offer the expected volumes of gasoline you would expect at a “gas 
station” - nor the amenities that a standard gas station would offer. 

jsut as we differentiate between fast food and restaurant that serves burgers, 
there should be a difference between a non-standard fuel shop and a gas 
station, though both might have gasoline, in some form, for cars


 
 I tried to attach my icon for this purpose but this silly listserve software 
 doesn't allow that. 

it has to be really small - like 10-20 K.  

Javbw___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Dave Swarthout
 Nobody's proposing another amenity tag. My thrust here is to gather
 opinions about adding another shop key, this one a shop for petrol (gas,
 gasohol, etc.). The places I have in mind are not the same as standard
 fueling places, tagged amenity=fuel, in fact, I wish them to be tagged
 differently so the two types are not confused. They're much smaller and
 offer no other services or amenities whatsoever.


I tried to attach my icon for this purpose but this silly listserve
software doesn't allow that.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Jan van Bekkum
There is also more risk that fuel sold for cars is more polluted or that
water was added.

Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,

*Jan van Bekkum*
www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl


 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Obviously many mappers aren't reading the Wiki and use whatever tag sounds
 right to them. Makes what we're discussing here seem like a waste of energy
 :-(


Wrong!

Our process here will result in a tag that even non-wiki-readers or
non-English-readers will use perfectly!
I don't think that tag happens to be shop=fuel by the way.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:20 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:

 I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type.
 I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal,
 wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even
 farm gas which has different taxes.


See: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=fuel

Consider also the form max_quantity=X litres, with rendering deciding the
threshold between a tiny fuel stand and a proper petrol station.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Stephan Knauss

On 20.03.2015 11:44, John Willis wrote:

As long as distribution is non-traditional, a shop selling fuel oil and
cordwood for heating is fine with me (I have to read up on fuel= tagging )


shop=fuel sounds reasonable.

It seems to be used for coal, heating oil and kerosine. And a hand full 
of mistaggings of amenity=fuel)


http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8iB

as it's a new tag it can be properly refined by additional tags. 
amenity=fuel was introduced as car-fuel and is so wide understood as 
this that it's not realistic to expect this to change. and amenity is 
overloaded already.


think of it similar as amenity=place_of_worship. This is also a key that 
needs evaluation of at least the religion sub-key to be reasonably rendered.


Similar can be done with shop=fuel.

It can be differentiated into the kind of fuel available as well as 
taking into account quantity limitations if needed.


If we include tagging for proper petrol stations it could also replace 
amenity=fuel in the long term.

Keeping the sub-key tagging compatible would allow to tag it simultaneous.

Modern data consumer and renderer evaluate shop=fuel and subkeys, legacy 
only the amenity and miss out the newer features like coal or bottled fuel.


Stephan


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Dave Swarthout
I was gonna say we should probably consider adding subtags for bottled gas
like propane and butane so that shop=gas might eventually be subsumed by a
new overall shop=fuel. By the way, firewood is a fuel and could conceivably
fit in here too. I would want to stay away from using another amenity tag,
as John suggests too. This is not an amenity but a shop catering to a
certain group of people

Wiki definition: amenity=Covering an assortment of community facilities.
The Wiki doesn't really spell out the differences between shop and
amenities that sell things either so it's difficult to determine what
belongs where.

Also, FYI, I took a look at the objects currently tagged as shop=gas and
many of them appear to be incorrect. Judging from the aerials they are
actually the sort of thing we're referring to here as a full-service fuel
station, amenities with names like Valero, Texaco, Chevron.

Obviously many mappers aren't reading the Wiki and use whatever tag sounds
right to them. Makes what we're discussing here seem like a waste of energy
:-(

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:44 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:

 Maybe amenity=fuel_stand?

 Then we can tag it onto existing shops (like a DIY store) or micromap it
 onto gas stations.

 As long as distribution is non-traditional, a shop selling fuel oil and
 cordwood for heating is fine with me (I have to read up on fuel= tagging )

 I know there are shops and problem who sell stacked firewood as a fuel -
 or is that some other kind of shop?

 Javbw

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:



 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:40 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:

 If the DIY kerosene stands were tagged as gas stations, there would be
 thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of gas stations across Japan that are
 not gas stations. So I agree we should use shop=fuel.


 Great input, up to the conclusion.
 shop=fuel and shop=gas likely too close to the gas station tagging, and
 would start poping up where it's least expected.
 I don't have a great suggestion for anything better.
 But I do suggest that the next mapper to come by may talk about firewood
 shops, and other types of fuel.

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread John Willis


I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type.

I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, wood, 
different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even farm gas 
which has different taxes. 

How can those be defined - esp if a shop sells more than one ( like my Japanese 
gas station that also sells kerosene?) 

Javbw

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
 
 On 20.03.2015 11:44, John Willis wrote:
 As long as distribution is non-traditional, a shop selling fuel oil and
 cordwood for heating is fine with me (I have to read up on fuel= tagging )
 
 shop=fuel sounds reasonable.
 
 It seems to be used for coal, heating oil and kerosine. And a hand full of 
 mistaggings of amenity=fuel)
 
 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8iB
 
 as it's a new tag it can be properly refined by additional tags. amenity=fuel 
 was introduced as car-fuel and is so wide understood as this that it's not 
 realistic to expect this to change. and amenity is overloaded already.
 
 think of it similar as amenity=place_of_worship. This is also a key that 
 needs evaluation of at least the religion sub-key to be reasonably rendered.
 
 Similar can be done with shop=fuel.
 
 It can be differentiated into the kind of fuel available as well as taking 
 into account quantity limitations if needed.
 
 If we include tagging for proper petrol stations it could also replace 
 amenity=fuel in the long term.
 Keeping the sub-key tagging compatible would allow to tag it simultaneous.
 
 Modern data consumer and renderer evaluate shop=fuel and subkeys, legacy only 
 the amenity and miss out the newer features like coal or bottled fuel.
 
 Stephan
 
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Warin

On 20/03/2015 5:08 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Dave Swarthout 
daveswarth...@gmail.com mailto:daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:


Obviously many mappers aren't reading the Wiki and use whatever
tag sounds right to them. Makes what we're discussing here seem
like a waste of energy :-(


Wrong!

Our process here will result in a tag that even non-wiki-readers or 
non-English-readers will use perfectly!

I don't think that tag happens to be shop=fuel by the way.




So what do you think it should be?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-19 22:46 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:

 I've come across regular filling stations without a roof.



+1, in Italy you can find lots of them (in the city there are much more of
these than roofed ones). Also don't seem to have oil traps in many
occasions (not completely sure on this), often they are simply 2 petrol
pumps at the roadside, with a very small cabin for the service staff which
is mostly absent (you pay in advance at an automated system). Example here:
https://www.google.it/maps/place/Rome/@41.859706,12.495028,3a,75y,14.06h,80.83t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sc27sLdpnlS06ecnb-MeQzw!2e0!4m2!3m1!1s0x132f6196f9928ebb:0xb90f770693656e38

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread johnw

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote:
 
 I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type.
 
 I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, 
 wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even 
 farm gas which has different taxes.
 
 How can those be defined - esp if a shop sells more than one ( like my 
 Japanese gas station that also sells kerosene?)
 
 Read the wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel 
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel

Thanks for the link. 
 
 that lists various octane ratings, LPG, wood, electric, diesel...
 
 It misses on various things as it is designed for amenity=fuel ...
 but has been expanded for amenity=bbq ... that expansion has not followed the 
 same system though.

well, I guess you could use fuel:wood=yes for a place that sells firewood, same 
with charcoal, if it was of mappable importance. 

at least they didn’t try to define the liquid fuels the same way (“gas”), and 
left it to us to add propane/kerosene, etc. 

 
 You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing 
 values and it should be fine.
 I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene.
 I'd leave the avgas and jet fuel for later when aviation types want it, not 
 something you normally see for sale.

yea, I’m more interested in kerosene for mapping Japan. Propane in the US is 
for BBQ grills, right? as far as the heating oils they use for the central 
heaters in the eastern US, I have no idea what it is actually called. 

 'Opal' fuel is a special petrol that exists in 'outback' Australia .. maybe 
 that could be added.

if that is how it’s displayed, I would add it, as it is not “normal” gasoline. 
There’s another additive down there too, the adblue stuff. 

 it discourages kids sniffing petrol and ending up without brains. Some people 
 use avgas in their vehicles for the same purpose.

there must not be a lot of stuff to do out there, I take it. 

Javbw.___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Warin

On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote:


I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type.

I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, wood, different 
grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even farm gas which has 
different taxes.

How can those be defined - esp if a shop sells more than one ( like my Japanese 
gas station that also sells kerosene?)


Read the wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel

that lists various octane ratings, LPG, wood, electric, diesel...

It misses on various things as it is designed for amenity=fuel ...
but has been expanded for amenity=bbq ... that expansion has not followed the 
same system though.

You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing 
values and it should be fine.
I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene.
I'd leave the avgas and jet fuel for later when aviation types want it, not 
something you normally see for sale.
'Opal' fuel is a special petrol that exists in 'outback' Australia .. maybe 
that could be added.
it discourages kids sniffing petrol and ending up without brains. Some people 
use avgas in their vehicles for the same purpose.




Javbw




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Warin

On 20/03/2015 5:01 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
I was gonna say we should probably consider adding subtags for bottled 
gas like propane and butane so that shop=gas might eventually be 
subsumed by a new overall shop=fuel. By the way, firewood is a fuel 
and could conceivably fit in here too. I would want to stay away from 
using another amenity tag, as John suggests too. This is not an 
amenity but a shop catering to a certain group of people


Wiki definition: amenity=Covering an assortment of community 
facilities. The Wiki doesn't really spell out the differences between 
shop and amenities that sell things either so it's difficult to 
determine what belongs where.


Also, FYI, I took a look at the objects currently tagged as shop=gas 
and many of them appear to be incorrect. Judging from the aerials they 
are actually the sort of thing we're referring to here as a 
full-service fuel station, amenities with names like Valero, Texaco, 
Chevron.
North American I'd guess from the word 'gas' ... search the wiki for 
'gas' redirects to a Russian page .. in English.. a gas pipeline. That 
is not very helpful to a North American... it should not automatically 
redirect to that .. rather give the options ...


amenity=fuel for petrol/gas stations

gas pipelines in both Russian and English...



Obviously many mappers aren't reading the Wiki and use whatever tag 
sounds right to them. Makes what we're discussing here seem like a 
waste of energy :-(



From my above search .. looking for 'gas' gets you a Russian page on  
gas pipeling... no help at all. No wonder we have shop=gas .. very 
logical from the North American mapper view.


I've edited the wiki 'Gas' page... My Russian is long ago tourist stuff 
.. beer, icecream (much better than the beer!) that kind of thing. If 
someone with a little Russian can look at it?


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gas


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread John Willis


Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:18 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 There is a similar confusion for kerosine (US), paraffine (UK), petroleum 
 (NL); it all the same liquid

Yikes!

Paraffin is a wax, and petroleum is just a fancy word for oil in general. I 
think Kerosene is the winner for the tag. 

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraffin_wax

They mention paraffin is sometimes used to refer to the separate kerosene 
liquid. 

Language is so interesting ^_^



 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:29 PM johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
 On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote:
 
 I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type.
 
 I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, 
 wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even 
 farm gas which has different taxes.
 
 How can those be defined - esp if a shop sells more than one ( like my 
 Japanese gas station that also sells kerosene?)
 
 Read the wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel
 
 Thanks for the link. 
 
 
 that lists various octane ratings, LPG, wood, electric, diesel...
 
 It misses on various things as it is designed for amenity=fuel ...
 but has been expanded for amenity=bbq ... that expansion has not followed 
 the same system though.
 
 well, I guess you could use fuel:wood=yes for a place that sells firewood, 
 same with charcoal, if it was of mappable importance. 
 
 at least they didn’t try to define the liquid fuels the same way (“gas”), 
 and left it to us to add propane/kerosene, etc. 
 
 
 You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing 
 values and it should be fine.
 I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene.
 I'd leave the avgas and jet fuel for later when aviation types want it, not 
 something you normally see for sale.
 
 yea, I’m more interested in kerosene for mapping Japan. Propane in the US is 
 for BBQ grills, right? as far as the heating oils they use for the central 
 heaters in the eastern US, I have no idea what it is actually called. 
 
 'Opal' fuel is a special petrol that exists in 'outback' Australia .. maybe 
 that could be added.
 
 if that is how it’s displayed, I would add it, as it is not “normal” 
 gasoline. There’s another additive down there too, the adblue stuff. 
 
 it discourages kids sniffing petrol and ending up without brains. Some 
 people use avgas in their vehicles for the same purpose.
 
 there must not be a lot of stuff to do out there, I take it. 
 
 Javbw.
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Jan van Bekkum
There is a similar confusion for kerosine (US), paraffine (UK), petroleum
(NL); it all the same liquid.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:29 PM johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote:


 I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type.

 I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal,
 wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even
 farm gas which has different taxes.

 How can those be defined - esp if a shop sells more than one ( like my
 Japanese gas station that also sells kerosene?)


 Read the wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel


 Thanks for the link.


 that lists various octane ratings, LPG, wood, electric, diesel...

 It misses on various things as it is designed for amenity=fuel ...
 but has been expanded for amenity=bbq ... that expansion has not followed
 the same system though.


 well, I guess you could use fuel:wood=yes for a place that sells firewood,
 same with charcoal, if it was of mappable importance.

 at least they didn’t try to define the liquid fuels the same way (“gas”),
 and left it to us to add propane/kerosene, etc.


 You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the
 existing values and it should be fine.
 I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene.

 I'd leave the avgas and jet fuel for later when aviation types want it,
 not something you normally see for sale.


 yea, I’m more interested in kerosene for mapping Japan. Propane in the US
 is for BBQ grills, right? as far as the heating oils they use for the
 central heaters in the eastern US, I have no idea what it is actually
 called.

 'Opal' fuel is a special petrol that exists in 'outback' Australia ..
 maybe that could be added.


 if that is how it’s displayed, I would add it, as it is not “normal”
 gasoline. There’s another additive down there too, the adblue stuff.

 it discourages kids sniffing petrol and ending up without brains. Some
 people use avgas in their vehicles for the same purpose.


 there must not be a lot of stuff to do out there, I take it.

 Javbw.
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 19 March 2015 at 21:46, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

 The existence of a roof does not identify
 a 'regular filling station' to me.

amenity=fuel
pumps=8

vs.

amenity=fuel
pumps=0

?


-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:


 If you do require a larger volume of fuel .. I think those low volume places 
 would direct you to a high volume place, and be able to provide enough fuel 
 to get there.


If you speak their language :-).
 The bottled fuel is a world apart from a a proper BP station.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:

 amenity=fuel
 fuel=bottled


Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station.
fuel=bottled in addition would create some confusion if the fuel was in a
drum with a pump.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Warin

On 20/03/2015 9:30 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

On 19 March 2015 at 21:46, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:


The existence of a roof does not identify
a 'regular filling station' to me.

amenity=fuel
pumps=8

vs.

amenity=fuel
pumps=0

?




Humm pump is used http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump

And pump does not tell the different=ce between bottle and drum.

I've suggested the dispensing method as one idea..
Another idea is the storage method or quanity .. easiest for the mapper 
to determine method?


fuel:storage=bottle, drum, tank Needs words to say that the tank is a 
large volume. ?


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Warin

On 20/03/2015 9:01 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

On 19 March 2015 at 09:18, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:


Here in Thailand, and especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops
that sell motor fuel in small quantities.

amenity=fuel
fuel=bottled

The key fuel= is used to identify the type of fuel see 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel


Possibly something like

dispensed=bottle/drum/pump

?

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Warin

On 20/03/2015 9:39 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andy Mabbett 
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:


amenity=fuel
fuel=bottled


Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station.
fuel=bottled in addition would create some confusion if the fuel was 
in a drum with a pump.




Rendering can change.. if there is enough need. For example some renders 
look for;
 the surface tag to render roads that are unpaved differently from 
those that are paved.
the tags for bicycle use to determine if paths, footways are available 
for bicycle use..




As I said

the key fuel= is in use to distinguish the type of fuel .. CNG, diesel, 
petrol, kero etc. Not for the dispensing method.


amenity=fuel

and possibly
dispenser= bottle, drum, pump (where pump is what Australians call a 
'bowser' .. and what is presently used to render amenity=fuel)


or
fuel:storage=bottle, drum,tank. Needs words to describe there things, 
particularly that the 'tank' is much larger than the drum.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Dave Swarthout
I don't see where all the confusion comes from. I chose shop=fuel for the
exact reason of avoiding confusion with full-service filling stations,
which is the primary reason for wanting a new tag in the first place. We
want to avoid using amenity=fuel for this type of shop. I have designed a
custom icon for use with this sort of shop and they show up fine on my
Garmin and Basecamp. It could be modified for use in OSM if needed.

The word fuel avoids confusion with the British petrol (petroleum) and
the American gas (gasoline) and also with shop=gas which already exists
to denote a place that sells propane or camping gas canisters. There is no
substance named motorcycle petrol or bike petrol, it's normal gasoline.
Roofs do not make a petrol station anymore than do electric pumps. Also,
roof is an attribute of a building, not a petrol station.

Fuel=bottled won't fly either because the fuel tag defines what variety of
fuel is available: diesel, gasohol, or whatever, not its delivery method.

Dave

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 20/03/2015 9:30 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

 On 19 March 2015 at 21:46, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

  The existence of a roof does not identify
 a 'regular filling station' to me.

 amenity=fuel
 pumps=8

 vs.

 amenity=fuel
 pumps=0

 ?



 Humm pump is used http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump

 And pump does not tell the different=ce between bottle and drum.

 I've suggested the dispensing method as one idea..
 Another idea is the storage method or quanity .. easiest for the mapper to
 determine method?

 fuel:storage=bottle, drum, tank Needs words to say that the tank is a
 large volume. ?


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andrew Errington
I think they should remain as amenity=fuel (I have visited Thailand and I
know what you mean).  Local people will know what to expect, but for
clarity perhaps subtags should be used to add detail and differentiate
between a filling station and a lemonade stand selling fuel.

On Thursday, 19 March 2015, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:

 In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with
 some big bottles with fuel.

 2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
 javascript:;:
  I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
  especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor
 fuel
  in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are
 used
  for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
  perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent fill-ups.
  To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks
 from
  which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel by
  the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
  seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
  other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel shop
  is, otherwise they're almost invisible
 
  At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a
 way
  that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
  mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging practice
 is
  to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike
 petrol
  or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
  tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be able
 to
  find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
  Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of
 it.
  Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one
 mapper's
  drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol. Where
 it
  will end is anyone's guess.
 
  I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
  perhaps shop=motor_fuel
 
  My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these shops
 can
  be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence
 made
  visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
  asset.
 
  Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg
 
  --
  Dave Swarthout
  Homer, Alaska
  Chiang Mai, Thailand
  Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
 


 --
 Lukas Sommer

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org javascript:;
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
Good idea to have such a tag, should include diesel for cars, kerosine for
heating and propane/butane for cooking that are sold in the same way. I
Kenya we have been in areas far away from regular filling stations; there
people are selling diesel from drums.

I think shop=fuel is dangerous as it is too close to amenity=fuel (which in
my opinion should be shop=fuel). There are more discussions about things
tagged as amenity or shop (see for example the discussion about
shop=car_storage).

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:20 AM Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
 especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor fuel
 in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are used
 for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
 perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent fill-ups.
 To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks from
 which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel by
 the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
 seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
 other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel shop
 is, otherwise they're almost invisible

 At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a way
 that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
 mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging practice is
 to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike petrol
 or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
 tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be able to
 find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
 Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of it.
 Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one mapper's
 drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol. Where it
 will end is anyone's guess.

 I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
 perhaps shop=motor_fuel

 My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these shops
 can be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence
 made visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
 asset.

 Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg

 --
 Dave Swarthout
 Homer, Alaska
 Chiang Mai, Thailand
 Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
  ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Lukas Sommer
In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with
some big bottles with fuel.

2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
 I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
 especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor fuel
 in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are used
 for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
 perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent fill-ups.
 To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks from
 which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel by
 the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
 seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
 other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel shop
 is, otherwise they're almost invisible

 At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a way
 that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
 mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging practice is
 to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike petrol
 or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
 tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be able to
 find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
 Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of it.
 Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one mapper's
 drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol. Where it
 will end is anyone's guess.

 I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
 perhaps shop=motor_fuel

 My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these shops can
 be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence made
 visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
 asset.

 Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg

 --
 Dave Swarthout
 Homer, Alaska
 Chiang Mai, Thailand
 Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com



-- 
Lukas Sommer

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Dave Swarthout
I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor fuel
in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are used
for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent fill-ups.
To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks from
which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel by
the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel shop
is, otherwise they're almost invisible

At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a way
that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging practice is
to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike petrol
or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be able to
find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of it.
Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one mapper's
drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol. Where it
will end is anyone's guess.

I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
perhaps shop=motor_fuel

My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these shops can
be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence made
visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
asset.

Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg

-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to be
rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas
with subtag would be better.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:46 AM Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I think they should remain as amenity=fuel (I have visited Thailand and I
 know what you mean).  Local people will know what to expect, but for
 clarity perhaps subtags should be used to add detail and differentiate
 between a filling station and a lemonade stand selling fuel.

 On Thursday, 19 March 2015, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:

 In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with
 some big bottles with fuel.

 2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
  I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
  especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor
 fuel
  in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are
 used
  for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
  perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent
 fill-ups.
  To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks
 from
  which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel
 by
  the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
  seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
  other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel
 shop
  is, otherwise they're almost invisible
 
  At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a
 way
  that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
  mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging practice
 is
  to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike
 petrol
  or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
  tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be able
 to
  find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
  Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of
 it.
  Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one
 mapper's
  drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol.
 Where it
  will end is anyone's guess.
 
  I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
  perhaps shop=motor_fuel
 
  My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these shops
 can
  be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence
 made
  visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
  asset.
 
  Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg
 
  --
  Dave Swarthout
  Homer, Alaska
  Chiang Mai, Thailand
  Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
 


 --
 Lukas Sommer

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread johnw
I have a similar issue in Japan. Japan uses kerosene for portable heaters in 
the winter, and there is no real fuel delivery (to a consumer), such as heating 
oil in the Eastern US. Everyone in Japan has use use plastic 5Gal/18-20L tanks 
carried in the car and kept outside the house for filling even smaller cans 
that insert into a room heater. most homes here have tanks of kerosene outside 
their house (in specially designed tank holders and tank chests, of course).

There are two sources of Kerosene everywhere in Japan.

1) Most gas stations have a separate Roof/pump combo for people to bring their  
tanks to. Although it essentially is an ordinary gas pump, it is not for cars.  
It has a large step in front where you can set your gas can to fill it. People 
bring there kerosene cans to the location for filling. These are always 
separated from he gas pump islands, and often mappable when micro-mapping a gas 
station. Maybe this is an amenity of the gas station, as just another fuel they 
offer (like diesel), but I would consider tagging it separately if I can map 
it. 

2) The second is where these Thai fuel stations intersects with my case. Many 
home stores / DIY stores also sell Kerosene, with a similar stand and filling 
equipment - with no gas station for cars. Tagging this as a gas station seems 
really wrong. I’m talking about permanent buildings and underground tanks - but 
for Kerosene distributed into plastic tanks. I’m not talking about bottled gas 
they sell for string trimmers inside - I’m talking about a mini gas station 
just for kerosene - an unorthodox fuel distribution system that should be 
mapped, but should be differentiated from a “gas station” 

DIY store 1 https://goo.gl/maps/YTQnz https://goo.gl/maps/YTQnz  The small 
blue pushcarts on the ground help you move the full tanks from the pumps to 
your car (access to most pumps is restricted to foot only). They sell gasoline 
300m away at a 25 pump standard gas station. This so a totally separate amenity 
not to be confused with a gas station. 

DIY store 2 https://goo.gl/maps/I8n2y https://goo.gl/maps/I8n2y a smaller 1 
pump kerosene stand. It still uses a gas-station style pump, but it is in the 
small building. Note the (blurry) red gas can icon.  In the background, there 
is a blue gas station in the distance, not related.

Gas station https://goo.gl/maps/4S8Gh https://goo.gl/maps/4S8Gh  Note there 
are two separate islands. The small one to the right is the kerosene stand. The 
woman is loading a filled can, with a plastic bag over it (to keep the smell 
down). More push carts too. 

If the DIY kerosene stands were tagged as gas stations, there would be 
thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of gas stations across Japan that are not 
gas stations. 

So I agree we should use shop=fuel.

This would separate the proper gas stations (even makesift stands, as long as 
they hve pumps and presumed large supply of gasoline). and these stands for 
fuel distribution in an unexpected or non-vehecle oriented way. 

Then the fuel type can be tagged (kerosene, gasoline, etc),

For the example in Thailand, you can tag a fuel stand and add a fuel type tag 
for Gasoline.

this way, we can differentiate it from the gas pump by using the icon of a Gas 
Can, the traditional rectangle with the X on the side. The can may imply the 
source of the gasoline is non-traditional (Thailand) or the can is the method 
accepted by the shop (Japan). 

Maybe a ranger station or boat dock or emergency service also has some kind of 
unothodox fuel distribution system using cans or containers, open to the public 
this would work for that as well. 

 (pulled from google image search). 


Javbw


 On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:46 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to be 
 rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas with 
 subtag would be better.
 
 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:46 AM Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com 
 mailto:erringt...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think they should remain as amenity=fuel (I have visited Thailand and I 
 know what you mean).  Local people will know what to expect, but for clarity 
 perhaps subtags should be used to add detail and differentiate between a 
 filling station and a lemonade stand selling fuel.
 
 On Thursday, 19 March 2015, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com 
 mailto:sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
 In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with
 some big bottles with fuel.
 
 2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com :
  I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
  especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor fuel
  in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are used
  for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
  perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent fill-ups.
  

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread David Bannon
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 08:46 +1100, Warin wrote:

  
 I've come across regular filling stations without a roof. 

Indeed, absolutely no reason a full service or pump based fuel
supplier must have a roof.

Usually an office (or shipping container) nearby but pumps out in the
open is very common.

David

 Somewhere in Scotland.. on a Sunday .. no one there but a credit card reader 
 so I could get fuel. 
 Others in Australia .. White Cliffs,  Warburton, Docker River, Laverton, 
 Carnegie Station and many others. 
 The existence of a roof does not identify a 'regular filling station' to me. 



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:40 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:

 If the DIY kerosene stands were tagged as gas stations, there would be
 thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of gas stations across Japan that are
 not gas stations. So I agree we should use shop=fuel.


Great input, up to the conclusion.
shop=fuel and shop=gas likely too close to the gas station tagging, and
would start poping up where it's least expected.
I don't have a great suggestion for anything better.
But I do suggest that the next mapper to come by may talk about firewood
shops, and other types of fuel.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread John Willis
Maybe amenity=fuel_stand?

Then we can tag it onto existing shops (like a DIY store) or micromap it onto 
gas stations. 

As long as distribution is non-traditional, a shop selling fuel oil and 
cordwood for heating is fine with me (I have to read up on fuel= tagging ) 

I know there are shops and problem who sell stacked firewood as a fuel - or is 
that some other kind of shop?

Javbw

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
 
 
 
 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:40 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
 If the DIY kerosene stands were tagged as gas stations, there would be 
 thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of gas stations across Japan that are 
 not gas stations. So I agree we should use shop=fuel.
 
 Great input, up to the conclusion.
 shop=fuel and shop=gas likely too close to the gas station tagging, and would 
 start poping up where it's least expected.
 I don't have a great suggestion for anything better.  
 But I do suggest that the next mapper to come by may talk about firewood 
 shops, and other types of fuel.
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andreas Goss

You could set all the fuel types to no (fuel:*=no), or add a new one
(fuel:motorbike=yes).  Or add motorbike=fuel.


Except there isn't anything like motorbile fuel.


Keeping it as amenity=fuel means all mapping tools and search tools
continue to work.


Which is exactly the problem. Now your lemon stand shows up as gas 
station...

__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
It is expected that most renderers only look at the namespace tag, not at
the attributes. How do we ensure that I don't end up at a bottle store
while I expect a decent filling station. I am afraid that we pollute the
amenity=fuel tag if we use it for fuel out of a drum as well? We really
should use a different namespace tag.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:46 PM Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:


 2015-03-19 17:12 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:

 brand=none or
 no_brand=yes to proper mark the independence.



 some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use
 these as their brand, see e.g. here:
 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_freier_Tankstellen
 not being part of a mineral oil corporation doesn't necessarily mean you
 don't use a brand name.

 Cheers,
 Martin
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread John F. Eldredge
In American ideom, gas is often a contraction of gasoline, which the British 
call petrol. Given differing terminology, and that such shops may sell propane 
and diesel fuel as well as gasoline/petrol, shop=fuel is probably the best 
solution.


On March 19, 2015 8:21:36 AM CDT, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
 2015-03-19 13:46 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com:
 
  I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade
 table to
  be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag
 shop=gas
  with subtag would be better.
 
 
 I like shop, but gas is an aggregate state of any element. Why not
 stick
 with fuel?
 
 Janko
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive 
out hate; only love can do that. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Janko Mihelić
2015-03-19 13:46 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com:

 I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to
 be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas
 with subtag would be better.


I like shop, but gas is an aggregate state of any element. Why not stick
with fuel?

Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Stephan Knauss

On 19.03.2015 20:31, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:

However I can see nothing wrong with amenity=fuel, that is what it is in that 
part of the world . What turns amenity=fuel into a regular filling station is 
the building=roof.


There is a huge difference. You'll notice that if you end up with your 
Diesel pickup in front of a amenity=fuel shelf out of Whiskey bottles 
filled with gasoline. The quantity is even too small to substantially 
fill up a car.


Those pumps from a barrel are fine for a car. We used them recently on a 
trip near Doi Inthanon. Filling up 500 Baht of Diesel was no issue at all.


There is operator=independent.
I suggest this along with amenity=fuel for everything which is suitable 
for filling up a car or small truck/pickup.


This is to differentiate from big brands like PTT which usually also 
come with a convenience store/coffee shop.


Vending machines selling petrol for cars also fine.

The problem are vending machines only serving for motorbikes and those 
bottle-shops.
I would like to avoid them being amenity=fuel as it is hard to convince 
every western map-maker to query additional tags before deciding how to 
render them. That tag is already too established without extra tags.


Stephan


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread phil
On Thu Mar 19 12:46:02 2015 GMT, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
 I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to be
 rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas
 with subtag would be better.

I would expect  shop=gas to sell bottled gas for camping 

Gas as you have used it is American,  the English is petrol.

However I can see nothing wrong with amenity=fuel, that is what it is in that 
part of the world . What turns amenity=fuel into a regular filling station is 
the building=roof.

Phil (trigpoint)



 
 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:46 AM Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  I think they should remain as amenity=fuel (I have visited Thailand and I
  know what you mean).  Local people will know what to expect, but for
  clarity perhaps subtags should be used to add detail and differentiate
  between a filling station and a lemonade stand selling fuel.
 
  On Thursday, 19 March 2015, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with
  some big bottles with fuel.
 
  2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
   I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
   especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor
  fuel
   in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are
  used
   for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
   perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent
  fill-ups.
   To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks
  from
   which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel
  by
   the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
   seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
   other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel
  shop
   is, otherwise they're almost invisible
  
   At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a
  way
   that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
   mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging practice
  is
   to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike
  petrol
   or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
   tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be able
  to
   find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
   Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of
  it.
   Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one
  mapper's
   drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol.
  Where it
   will end is anyone's guess.
  
   I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
   perhaps shop=motor_fuel
  
   My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these shops
  can
   be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence
  made
   visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
   asset.
  
   Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
   https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg
  
   --
   Dave Swarthout
   Homer, Alaska
   Chiang Mai, Thailand
   Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
  
 
 
  --
  Lukas Sommer
 
  ___
  Tagging mailing list
  Tagging@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 
  ___
  Tagging mailing list
  Tagging@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 


-- 
Sent from my Jolla
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andrew Errington
But, it *is* a fuel amenity.  It's down to the individual what picture they
have in their mind.  Additional tags would clarify this, but I don't think
alternative tags are needed.

You could set all the fuel types to no (fuel:*=no), or add a new one
(fuel:motorbike=yes).  Or add motorbike=fuel.

Keeping it as amenity=fuel means all mapping tools and search tools
continue to work.

On Thursday, 19 March 2015, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:

 I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to
 be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas
 with subtag would be better.

 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:46 AM Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','erringt...@gmail.com'); wrote:

 I think they should remain as amenity=fuel (I have visited Thailand and I
 know what you mean).  Local people will know what to expect, but for
 clarity perhaps subtags should be used to add detail and differentiate
 between a filling station and a lemonade stand selling fuel.

 On Thursday, 19 March 2015, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sommer...@gmail.com'); wrote:

 In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with
 some big bottles with fuel.

 2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
  I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and
  especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor
 fuel
  in small quantities. Most of the population drive motorbikes which are
 used
  for every sort of transport imaginable. They have a tiny petrol tank,
  perhaps 4-5 liters, therefore a short range; they need frequent
 fill-ups.
  To meet this need local individuals have set up small sheds or kiosks
 from
  which they hand pump the small quantities needed. Some shops sell fuel
 by
  the liter bottle, often a whiskey bottle. Such shops are poorly marked,
  seldom have any signs indicating their presence and typically offer no
  other services. If you live in the area you will know where the fuel
 shop
  is, otherwise they're almost invisible
 
  At any rate, we're looking for a way to tag these fuel shops in such a
 way
  that they become visible in OSM (and on our GPS units), and will not be
  mistaken for a full size fuel service station. Current tagging
 practice is
  to tag them with amenity=fuel and a made up name, for example, Bike
 petrol
  or Drummed fuel. The people doing this are aware of the fact that such
  tagging isn't strictly correct, but they understandably want to be
 able to
  find those shops should they run out of fuel. One problem with this
  Thailand-centric approach, is that other data consumers are unaware of
 it.
  Another is that the informal names are multiplying rapidly and one
 mapper's
  drummed fuel is another's barreled fuel and another's Bike petrol.
 Where it
  will end is anyone's guess.
 
  I'm suggesting an addition to the values of the shop key: shop=fuel or
  perhaps shop=motor_fuel
 
  My goal is to standardize the tagging so that at some point these
 shops can
  be eventually rendered on Garmin compatible downloaded maps and hence
 made
  visible. I have done this for my custom Garmin maps and find it a real
  asset.
 
  Here is a photo of such a shop in my neighborhood:
  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABarreled_fuel_shop.jpg
 
  --
  Dave Swarthout
  Homer, Alaska
  Chiang Mai, Thailand
  Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
 


 --
 Lukas Sommer

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Tagging@openstreetmap.org');
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-19 17:51 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com:

 It is expected that most renderers only look at the namespace tag, not at
 the attributes. How do we ensure that I don't end up at a bottle store
 while I expect a decent filling station. I am afraid that we pollute the
 amenity=fuel tag if we use it for fuel out of a drum as well? We really
 should use a different namespace tag.



don't know why you wrote this in a reply to my email which you cited, but I
agree with you, businesses which sell petrol in such small quantities that
it is not suitable to fill the tank of your car should not be tagged with
amenity=fuel IMHO, because otherwise they will be misstaken.


cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
amenity=bottled_motor_fuel
phone= (because many have mobile phones)
name= (name of individual proprietor)

It has the same fuzzy border as supermarket vs. convenience.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
+1

The last thin I want is to count on a regular filling station and to and up
at a bottle store with my 4WD. A that will happen if the type of store is
an attribute, as map makers will show them the same. So please make it a
different value for the tag, not fuel.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
wrote:

 On 19.03.2015 20:31, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
  However I can see nothing wrong with amenity=fuel, that is what it is in
 that part of the world . What turns amenity=fuel into a regular filling
 station is the building=roof.

 There is a huge difference. You'll notice that if you end up with your
 Diesel pickup in front of a amenity=fuel shelf out of Whiskey bottles
 filled with gasoline. The quantity is even too small to substantially
 fill up a car.

 Those pumps from a barrel are fine for a car. We used them recently on a
 trip near Doi Inthanon. Filling up 500 Baht of Diesel was no issue at all.

 There is operator=independent.
 I suggest this along with amenity=fuel for everything which is suitable
 for filling up a car or small truck/pickup.

 This is to differentiate from big brands like PTT which usually also
 come with a convenience store/coffee shop.

 Vending machines selling petrol for cars also fine.

 The problem are vending machines only serving for motorbikes and those
 bottle-shops.
 I would like to avoid them being amenity=fuel as it is hard to convince
 every western map-maker to query additional tags before deciding how to
 render them. That tag is already too established without extra tags.

 Stephan


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 19 March 2015 at 09:18, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:

 Here in Thailand, and especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops
 that sell motor fuel in small quantities.

amenity=fuel
fuel=bottled

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread fly
I see no problem with amenity or shop as long as the description on the
wiki is well done. It is an amenity no doubt but we need proper subtags
for the vehicles and the amount.

shop=fuel was mentioned on a different thread about companies which fill
up your private diesel or gas tanks for heating, so we always have to
distinguish between small and big suppliers.

operator=independent is similar to highway=living_street an easter egg.
The operator is still some judicial person and we need brand=none or
no_brand=yes to proper mark the independence.

cu fly

Am 19.03.2015 um 15:25 schrieb Jan van Bekkum:
 +1
 
 The last thin I want is to count on a regular filling station and to and up
 at a bottle store with my 4WD. A that will happen if the type of store is
 an attribute, as map makers will show them the same. So please make it a
 different value for the tag, not fuel.
 
 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
 wrote:
 
 On 19.03.2015 20:31, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
 However I can see nothing wrong with amenity=fuel, that is what it is in
 that part of the world . What turns amenity=fuel into a regular filling
 station is the building=roof.

 There is a huge difference. You'll notice that if you end up with your
 Diesel pickup in front of a amenity=fuel shelf out of Whiskey bottles
 filled with gasoline. The quantity is even too small to substantially
 fill up a car.

 Those pumps from a barrel are fine for a car. We used them recently on a
 trip near Doi Inthanon. Filling up 500 Baht of Diesel was no issue at all.

 There is operator=independent.
 I suggest this along with amenity=fuel for everything which is suitable
 for filling up a car or small truck/pickup.

 This is to differentiate from big brands like PTT which usually also
 come with a convenience store/coffee shop.

 Vending machines selling petrol for cars also fine.

 The problem are vending machines only serving for motorbikes and those
 bottle-shops.
 I would like to avoid them being amenity=fuel as it is hard to convince
 every western map-maker to query additional tags before deciding how to
 render them. That tag is already too established without extra tags.



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-19 17:12 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:

 brand=none or
 no_brand=yes to proper mark the independence.



some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use
these as their brand, see e.g. here:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_freier_Tankstellen
not being part of a mineral oil corporation doesn't necessarily mean you
don't use a brand name.

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging