Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-28 Thread John Smith
2009/9/28 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:

 I like it.

 Use the autopilot from here:

 http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Main_Page

The wired editor also has a site up that sells autopilot kit:

http://www.diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/ardupilot-main-page

 with one of these:

 http://www.rcwarehouse.com.au/productinfo/?prod_id=GPMA1180++

The wired editor had one of these:

http://castlehillhobbies.com.au/component/page,shop.product_details/flypage,shop.flypage_modern/product_id,5637/category_id,117/manufacturer_id,0/option,com_virtuemart/Itemid,1/

About the same price, slightly bigger wing span but what I don't know
is which would give better flight times...

 Capture the transmitted video, at the base station, as single frame with 
 lat/long/hdop encoded in the exif data with little or no need for manual 
 georeferencing.

You would decrease your flight time or increase the payload weight to
cope with the extra power needed for the live video feed, also RC
electronics and electric motors can interfere with transmitted images,
see the videos on this page:

http://www.rangevideo.com/index.php?main_page=product_infocPath=8products_id=98

I'm still trying to work out if a HD video camera or a 10MP+ camera
would be better, both types of cameras weigh only a few hundred grams
including battery and you could trigger the shutter from the onboard
computer.

 Program a staggered line ahead (roads) or grid (towns) search pattern and you 
 could cover most rural roads and towns in a short time.

And water ways and farms and other land uses for that matter.

 Sounds like fun and the airframe is cheap enough to have a couple for when 
 you break it.

Or cheap enough to have a few in the air at the same time to decrease
the time needed for coverage, although this might need multiple
pilots to be legal, not sure.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-27 Thread John Smith
Just found this video, HD camera mounted to a blimp and it gives you
some examples of metres per pixel at various heights, up to 318m.

It doesn't appear that they are using a fish eye lense, so at a guess
you might be able to get a similar scope from 150m as you do from
300m.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-27 Thread John Smith
2009/9/27 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
 Just found this video, HD camera mounted to a blimp and it gives you
 some examples of metres per pixel at various heights, up to 318m.

 It doesn't appear that they are using a fish eye lense, so at a guess
 you might be able to get a similar scope from 150m as you do from
 300m.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt37RfFJEcs

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-27 Thread John Smith
A cheaper option than blimps brought up on the talk list was covered
in a BBC doco:

http://www.cropcam.com

Only US$7000

Based on some of their 400ft sample imagery:

http://www.cropcam.com/images/samples/electrical-tower-nest.jpg

and some quick back of the napkin type math it looks like you can get
2-4cm/pixel fairly easily, each image seems to be about, again some
quick and dirty math, about 120m wide shots.

These model planes do about 60km/hr, so with 50% overlap it would take
about 10-15mins to do 1 sq km.

A cheaper alternative would be building our own using this open source project:

http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Solar-Storm

They claim 145mins flight time on this plane, which potentially is
8-10sq km, although with enough spare batteries you could do spend
entire day and potentially cover 40-50 sq km...

Not sure what these cost, but the editor for wired magazine claims to
have built a $600 UAV with autopilot:

http://fora.tv/2009/05/30/DIY_Drones_with_Chris_Anderson

There is a photo in his presentation where you can read the number
plate on a car, and this is using a fairly basic camera.

He also flew it over the google campus in San Francisco and pointed
out they had photoshopped their logo on top of a pool to make it look
like their pool had the google logo...

At $600/setup we'd only need to cover 50 sq km to break even with sat
imagery, not to mention sat imagery is at best 50cm/pixel, the $12/sq
km imagery is 2.4m colour I believe, or 50cm BW.

Obviously there is potentially a lot of other expenses involved,
travelling etc, you have to actively monitor any UAV even if they are
autopiloted due to CASA regulations, they must be in sight at all
times etc.

Due to restrictions around airports, 3 nautical miles, this would most
likely be best for regional areas, which funnily enough currently have
the worst imagery available. It should also be possible to cover outer
suburbs of metro areas where the most development is likely to be too.

I still think this could be funded by, including paying one or more
people to do this, their travel expenses and so on, by a sponsor or
someone wanting to get hi-res imagery on the cheap.

The big benefits of doing it ourselves compared to purchasing imagery
is the images won't have any cloud obstructions, the resolution is
much much higher, there would be no restrictions on what we can do
with the imagery after we use it to make maps and it would be current,
rather than imagery from 3+ years ago like yahoo currently shows.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread John Smith
2009/9/27 terryc ter...@woa.com.au:
 John Smith wrote:

 This gives us some basic specs to figure out what we'd need either to
 build or buy one, combined with a HD camera and low enough to the
 ground we wouldn't need to worry about clouds etc.

 For comparison, you really should compare buying/renting your own
 aircraft and flying it around Australia. This is where the detail aerial
 images that are behind google come from. That name as the bottom is the
 company that stitched them together.

If we had a UAV blimp capable of operating in some moderate wind
speeds it should be possible to program it to do overlapping areas,
possibly a lot cheaper than sat imagery.

Sydney is 1788 sq km according to wikipedia at $12/sq km comes out at
about $21,000 which is only a small area of NSW let alone Australia.

Also something just occurred to me, the imagery could possibly be
licensed to others to further fund the project.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread terryc
John Smith wrote:

 Sydney is 1788 sq km according to wikipedia at $12/sq km comes out at

Can you explain the $12/sqkms.
(That 1788 sqkms sounds awfully small to me, but anyway)
 about $21,000 which is only a small area of NSW let alone Australia.
 
 Also something just occurred to me, the imagery could possibly be
 licensed to others to further fund the project.

Is that possible under OSM?

(There is also the question of the established competition).



-- 
Terry Collins {:-)}
Bicycles, Appropriate Technology, Natural Environment, Welding

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread John Smith
2009/9/27 terryc ter...@woa.com.au:
 John Smith wrote:

 Sydney is 1788 sq km according to wikipedia at $12/sq km comes out at

 Can you explain the $12/sqkms.

Sat imagery with a non-profit discount is about US$12/sq km

 (That 1788 sqkms sounds awfully small to me, but anyway)

I looked again area is 12144.6 km² (I really must stop emailing late
at night), so at US$12/sq km = $145,000 The prices must have
dropped compared to what is on the OSM wiki which estimated the price
at $300k

 Is that possible under OSM?

We'd need a legal entity to do it under, however there is nothing I
know of that would prevent us from on selling/licensing assets the
legal entity produces to further fund itself.

 (There is also the question of the established competition).

This is the question, can we provide our own imagery cheaper than
others already doing it?

Which is probably yes, at that point could we use it as a funding source?

Instead of onselling/licensing the imagery we could see if Yahoo or
someone is interested in the results and willing to fund us to do
it...

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread John Smith
2009/9/27 Babstar debian-l...@blueturtles.com:
 One thing to consider is that the photography won't actually need to cover
 the *entire* state.  Given the way most rural towns work, it would just need
 the point-to-point connections to cover the important roads between towns as
 well as the towns themselves.  This vastly reduces the area required to get
 the most important features.

That assuming we don't want to do most/all of Australia so we can plot
land uses on maps too...

   I am in a position to be able to the flying if needed for free, however
 the majority of the cost is for the hire of the aircraft. The biggest issue
 is how to mount the camera equipment in the aircraft to get suitable images.
  I could do some further investigations if this was a path we were likely to
 go down.

Judging by the UK experiment into this I don't think hiring a plane
would be the most cost effective option, also the only way to do
proper photos without modifying an aircraft is to do sharp banking so
this would limit the amount of useful time in the air and
co-ordinating the collection of imagery etc.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread Jim Croft
$150 gives you a feed from space... ;)

http://www.universetoday.com/2009/09/21/reaching-near-space-for-less-than-150/

jim

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:17 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 2009/9/27 terryc ter...@woa.com.au:
 John Smith wrote:

 Sydney is 1788 sq km according to wikipedia at $12/sq km comes out at

 Can you explain the $12/sqkms.

 Sat imagery with a non-profit discount is about US$12/sq km

 (That 1788 sqkms sounds awfully small to me, but anyway)

 I looked again area is 12144.6 km² (I really must stop emailing late
 at night), so at US$12/sq km = $145,000 The prices must have
 dropped compared to what is on the OSM wiki which estimated the price
 at $300k

 Is that possible under OSM?

 We'd need a legal entity to do it under, however there is nothing I
 know of that would prevent us from on selling/licensing assets the
 legal entity produces to further fund itself.

 (There is also the question of the established competition).

 This is the question, can we provide our own imagery cheaper than
 others already doing it?

 Which is probably yes, at that point could we use it as a funding source?

 Instead of onselling/licensing the imagery we could see if Yahoo or
 someone is interested in the results and willing to fund us to do
 it...

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




-- 
_
Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
... in pursuit of the meaning of leaf ...
... 'All is leaf' ('Alles ist Blatt') - Goethe

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread Ross Scanlon
 From this website:
 
 http://www.skyshipsremote.com/airships.htm
 
 UK based company says in the UK there is an altitude limitation of
 400ft (~130m) for UAV aircraft, not sure if the same is true in
 Australia though. If it is we can probably still cope with this via
 fish eye lenses like the camera at the bottom of this page:


Applicable AU rules:

http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_91039

One way to go about capturing the images:

http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Webcam-HOWTO/

I had set up something along these lines with lat/long encoded onto it but 
found the resolution of the camera too low.  

With some of the new 10M pixels webcams it may fix that.

-- 
Cheers
Ross

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-26 Thread John Smith
2009/9/27 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
 Applicable AU rules:

 http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_91039

Same reg as the UK, maximum operating ceiling of 400ft for UAV aircraft.

Tethered balloons (and kites) are allowed up to 500ft...

Apart from any restricted air space around airports it most likely
wouldn't be practical for areas with tall buildings, but it would be
fine for land use etc, then it's just a matter of programming it with
way points and digital elevation information or a laser range finder
to estimate hieght. Having 4 ranger finders (down, front left, right)
and/or some kind of radar, might be useful to avoid collisions.

 One way to go about capturing the images:

 http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Webcam-HOWTO/

 I had set up something along these lines with lat/long encoded onto it but 
 found the resolution of the camera too low.

 With some of the new 10M pixels webcams it may fix that.

The other option is a HD digital video camera, even though the frame
sizes aren't as big we'd get a lot more of them. These cameras are now
reasonably priced and combined with a fish eye lense plus gyro
stabalised mount that always points vertical it's

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-22 Thread Liz
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Matt White wrote:
 So what does the commercial imagery cost? I don't even know who supplies
 itor what the licensing is like
In my mailbox today
www.aerialimpressions.com.au
We are conducting aerial photography in your area over the next 4 weeks
Save $200 Now $119 Receive 10 proofs of your home or property for just $119 
(incl GST)


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-22 Thread Liz
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Liz wrote:
 In my mailbox today
 www.aerialimpressions.com.au
 We are conducting aerial photography in your area over the next 4 weeks
 Save $200 Now $119 Receive 10 proofs of your home or property for just
 $119 (incl GST)
 http://aerialimpressions.com.au/gallery/twnTN010.jpg

looks quite usable for our purposes
but of course its copyright :-(


and here is the commercial cost
New Aerial Survey System
 We now have a new mapping system allowing us to shoot full surveys of any 
area. Pricing for this service starts at $50 per Sq Km ( 20 Sq Km Min.)

When we have a legal entity then we can start negotiating with companies like 
this for use of their photos

 


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-22 Thread Liz
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Liz wrote:
  http://aerialimpressions.com.au/gallery/twnTN010.jpg

 looks quite usable for our purposes
sorry, if you get to that image from the website, with the same name you get a 
reasonable size file not a thumbnail


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-22 Thread Matt White
Liz wrote:
 On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Liz wrote:
   
 In my mailbox today
 www.aerialimpressions.com.au
 We are conducting aerial photography in your area over the next 4 weeks
 Save $200 Now $119 Receive 10 proofs of your home or property for just
 $119 (incl GST)
 http://aerialimpressions.com.au/gallery/twnTN010.jpg
 

 looks quite usable for our purposes
 but of course its copyright :-(
   
At least one of their products is marked as copyright free... (Aerial 
Photography CDROM of Melbourne)

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-22 Thread John Smith
2009/9/22 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
 On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Liz wrote:
  http://aerialimpressions.com.au/gallery/twnTN010.jpg

 looks quite usable for our purposes
 sorry, if you get to that image from the website, with the same name you get a
 reasonable size file not a thumbnail

http://www.aerialimpressions.com.au/gallery/twn010.jpg

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-22 Thread John Smith
2009/9/22 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
 and here is the commercial cost
 New Aerial Survey System
  We now have a new mapping system allowing us to shoot full surveys of any
 area. Pricing for this service starts at $50 per Sq Km ( 20 Sq Km Min.)

Tad more expensive that sat imagery, wonder what they charge for
archive imagery.

 When we have a legal entity then we can start negotiating with companies like
 this for use of their photos

Did you or anyone else have a chance to look over the association
rules, if so was there anything I missed? or something that should
have been in there?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-19 Thread Matt White
Liz wrote:
 On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Matt wrote and John Smith copied:
   
 Either way, the big issue in Australia is trying to get people invloved
 in the regional areas, as it's just not feasible for us city folk to leg
 it 400km on the weekend to map a town.
   


 400km - do you think that's far?
 but points of interest get further apart so I can drive that far easily
 and map a place on the other end of the route

 Seriously I have several times done a more than 1000km round trip for the 
 purpose of mapping, and enjoying Australia too.
   
Not far, but given the first 80km is in traffic, it's time consuming :)

I think my best is probably only 650km is a single trip - mostly driven 
by the need to refuel the beast more than anything else, well, that and 
the road I tend to map really have a top speed of about 60km given the 
surface and windy-ness

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-18 Thread John Smith
I received a reply about the cost to rent a plane, about 230GBP for
one hour and the airport was close to the place they were
photographying and it was mostly a PR stunt.

Due to the sideways angle they are having difficulty rectifying images
and that side of things is being worked on however companies doing
this on a professional basis have a custom fit out of a plane with
gyro stabalising mounts and super expensive medium format or bigger
film sizes.

I was pointed to this link, which I've already seen and forgot about,
but it seems sat imagery is cheaper than trying to do it by plane:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_photography_funding_appeals#How_much_does_it_cost

About 12-17$ per sq km, US$ I'm guessing, although AU$ is up to 87c again.

If we could raise the funds needed the only question then is what do
we want imagery of?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-18 Thread Matt White
John Smith wrote:
 I received a reply about the cost to rent a plane, about 230GBP for
 one hour and the airport was close to the place they were
 photographying and it was mostly a PR stunt.

 Due to the sideways angle they are having difficulty rectifying images
 and that side of things is being worked on however companies doing
 this on a professional basis have a custom fit out of a plane with
 gyro stabalising mounts and super expensive medium format or bigger
 film sizes.

 I was pointed to this link, which I've already seen and forgot about,
 but it seems sat imagery is cheaper than trying to do it by plane:

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_photography_funding_appeals#How_much_does_it_cost

 About 12-17$ per sq km, US$ I'm guessing, although AU$ is up to 87c again.

 If we could raise the funds needed the only question then is what do
 we want imagery of?
   
That's for the two metre resolution - a plane would probably give better 
than 50cm resolution using a decent camera. Need to find some trainee 
pilots who need the flight time, and split the cost of the plane. Not 
sure how you'd rig the camera though.

I'd vote for getting a selection of regional towns - population  5000, 
with a reasonable number of smallers towns located close by (well, close 
in AU terms - within say 100km. Vic examples would be 
Hamilton/Casterton/Portland area, maybe Naracoorte or Renmark in SA). I 
think the approach has to be to kick off with the larger town - we do 
initial tracing to lay down the core road grid and style, and work out a 
way of getting someone in that town to start tracing and naming (thus no 
GPSr entry cost for the local mappers), and then work out how to 
publicise the fact. I'd try and use the local papers to do so - a quick 
article about how OSM is paying for high res aerial, and now we need to 
make some decent maps would kick it off. The regional papers would 
publish that sort of thing no probs (although you might need to target 
the few remaining independents rather than the Rural/APN papers).

There's also the Blokes Shed groups - retired blokes who tinker, who 
could probably benefit from the exercise walking around the town... 
although they could probably do most of it from memory.

If the satellite is good enough and cheap enough, most of these town 
might only be 20 sq km, so buying the sat imagery is possibly more 
viable cost wise.

Either way, the big issue in Australia is trying to get people invloved 
in the regional areas, as it's just not feasible for us city folk to leg 
it 400km on the weekend to map a town.

(That said, I've discovered that jumping onto the V-Line train early 
morning with the bike, and getting off at an unmapped town is both 
viable and cheap - a lot cheaper than driving there. You can get through 
a small town in a day easily on a bike. Just make sure you know when the 
last train back home is...)

Matt

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-14 Thread Matt White
John Smith wrote:
 2009/9/14  b.schulz...@scu.edu.au:
   
 I'm happy to download a few gig of that imagery and post out DVDs to people.
 

 at 250m/pixel it's not worth bothering with.
   
So what does the commercial imagery cost? I don't even know who supplies 
itor what the licensing is like

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-14 Thread John Smith
2009/9/14 Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au:

 So what does the commercial imagery cost? I don't even know who supplies
 itor what the licensing is like

Well having grown up in rural areas there is always people going round
offering to take photos of farms, then of course you have major
commercial operations that supply to the various governments for
various purposes.

I can't remember how much it costs to get a photo of your farm, but
commercial hi-res sat imagery is $300k per sq km according to the OSM
wiki.

Another option might be to hire a plane + pilot to go take your own
photos... Then of course there is hobbyists you could probably fly
with for the cost their fuel bill...

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread Graeme Wilson

First bit of snooping shows that Landsat imagery is now freely available at

 

http://landsat.usgs.gov/ 

 

Haven't yet figured out where the data is or how to get the data / images out 
yet, or whether there is any Aussie data there at all.

 

It says that the Landsat images are taken from 440 miles up, which is a lot 
more that I had thought. I presumed they were from about 160 miles or so.

 

Having fresh data is usefull when you want to draw in a new railway line like 
the one from Robina to Varsity Lakes on the Gold Coast. All I have been able to 
see so far is that there are two tracks, it does go underground for something 
like 300 metres or so and it hugs the Pacific Hwy. I only use Potlatch so cant 
render railway lines (or cant figure out how to).

 

There are Low Earth Orbiting weather satellites whizzing around at about 160 
miles altitude, which is what I was referring to earlier, operating around 137 
MHz, but the images are modulated onto an audio carrier, so in reality, it is 
very optimistic to expect to get much detail from them.

 

To be continued...

 

Graeme Wilson VK1RE

 


 
 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:29:54 +1000
 Subject: Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?
 From: deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
 To: wandere...@live.com.au
 CC: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 
 2009/9/12 Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au:
 
  Anyone interrested?
 
 I'm interested but I don't know how much help I could be or the
 legality of doing something like this.
 
 You would generally need several passes or more just to account for
 clouds obscuring the ground, before you even get to trying to turn low
 res into high res.
 
 I'm not sure how much use weather sats would be, since they are at
 higher orbits (36,000 km) than the ones usually taking ground imagery
 (425km).
 
 Another option might be to see if we can buy aerial photography images
 on the cheap or sponsored, even if they are well out of date there is
 a lot of towns that just haven't change much in the last 100 years in
 terms of roads at least.

_
View photos of singles in your area Click Here
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread John Smith
2009/9/13 Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au:
 It says that the Landsat images are taken from 440 miles up, which is a lot
 more that I had thought. I presumed they were from about 160 miles or so.

Weather doesn't need the same accuracy, plus they would orbit slower.

 Having fresh data is usefull when you want to draw in a new railway line
 like the one from Robina to Varsity Lakes on the Gold Coast. All I have been
 able to see so far is that there are two tracks, it does go underground for
 something like 300 metres or so and it hugs the Pacific Hwy. I only use
 Potlatch so cant render railway lines (or cant figure out how to).

It's worth learning JOSM for the ability to zoom in on sat imagery.
Who knows maybe potlatch can lock sat imagery zoom by now.

 There are Low Earth Orbiting weather satellites whizzing around at about 160
 miles altitude, which is what I was referring to earlier, operating around
 137 MHz, but the images are modulated onto an audio carrier, so in reality,
 it is very optimistic to expect to get much detail from them.

There is also this site:

http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016roll=Eframe=22759

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread Liz
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Graeme Wilson wrote:
 First bit of snooping shows that Landsat imagery is now freely available at



 http://landsat.usgs.gov/


That's a bleeding shame that the full archive has been available since last 
October, and we are still using stuff at least 8 years old for our area (pre-
drought, its all that funny green colour)


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread Graeme Wilson

There is data available for  free  from our own government but it is what 
they call medium resolution, that is 250 metres per pixel and it is free if you 
download it, and the file size is from 1.5 to 2.5 GB. (Yes, GB) or $150 per 
DVD, but at 250 m per pixel, I doubt it is usefull.

 

We need better than that.

 

To be continued...

 

Graeme Wilson VK1RE
 
 From: ed...@billiau.net
 To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:58:57 +1000
 Subject: Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?
 
 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Graeme Wilson wrote:
  First bit of snooping shows that Landsat imagery is now freely available at
 
 
 
  http://landsat.usgs.gov/
 
 
 That's a bleeding shame that the full archive has been available since last 
 October, and we are still using stuff at least 8 years old for our area (pre-
 drought, its all that funny green colour)
 
 
 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

_
Take a peek at other people's pay and perks Check out The Great Australian Pay 
Check
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639755/direct/01/___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread b . schulz . 10
I'm happy to download a few gig of that imagery and post out DVDs to people.

What site has it?

- Original Message -
From: Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au
Date: Monday, September 14, 2009 8:38 am
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?
To: ed...@billiau.net, talk-au OSM talk-au@openstreetmap.org

 
 There is data available for  free  from our own government but 
 it is what they call medium resolution, that is 250 metres per 
 pixel and it is free if you download it, and the file size is 
 from 1.5 to 2.5 GB. (Yes, GB) or $150 per DVD, but at 250 m per 
 pixel, I doubt it is usefull.
 
  
 
 We need better than that.
 
  
 
 To be continued...
 
  
 
 Graeme Wilson VK1RE
  
  From: ed...@billiau.net
  To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
  Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:58:57 +1000
  Subject: Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?
  
  On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Graeme Wilson wrote:
   First bit of snooping shows that Landsat imagery is now 
 freely available at
  
  
  
   http://landsat.usgs.gov/
  
  
  That's a bleeding shame that the full archive has been 
 available since last 
  October, and we are still using stuff at least 8 years old for 
 our area (pre-
  drought, its all that funny green colour)
  
  
  ___
  Talk-au mailing list
  Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
 
 _
 Take a peek at other people's pay and perks Check out The Great 
 Australian Pay Check
 http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639755/direct/01/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread John Smith
2009/9/14  b.schulz...@scu.edu.au:
 There's always this idea too:

 http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/09/13/1712216/Students-Take-Pictures-From-Space-On-150-Budget?art_pos=7

 A balloon based imagery project would be seriously cool. It would certainly
 be useful for getting imagery of small towns, university campuses etc.

Remote control blimp would be more useful since you'd be able to
control it, and keep it below clouds, if you go at or above the cloud
level you need to do multiple passes to get round clouds obscuring the
view.

The other option would be some kind of tethered balloon.

In any case none of these options would be very viable to mass capture
suitable imagery we could trace from.

I wonder if there is any UAV blimps with solar panels?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-13 Thread John Smith
2009/9/14  b.schulz...@scu.edu.au:
 I'm happy to download a few gig of that imagery and post out DVDs to people.

at 250m/pixel it's not worth bothering with.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Our own satellite imagery?

2009-09-12 Thread John Smith
2009/9/12 Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au:

 Anyone interrested?

I'm interested but I don't know how much help I could be or the
legality of doing something like this.

You would generally need several passes or more just to account for
clouds obscuring the ground, before you even get to trying to turn low
res into high res.

I'm not sure how much use weather sats would be, since they are at
higher orbits (36,000 km) than the ones usually taking ground imagery
(425km).

Another option might be to see if we can buy aerial photography images
on the cheap or sponsored, even if they are well out of date there is
a lot of towns that just haven't change much in the last 100 years in
terms of roads at least.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au