Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

2014-11-20 Thread Moreau , Jean-Sébastien
Hi all,

I currently work for the team responsible for the ftp site hosting the osm data 
available at this address: http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/OSM/pub/

I just want to let you know that there are no plan to delete this dataset. As 
any other releases of CanVec, it should remain on the ftp as an archive.
Although we did receive the request to update the osm version of CanVec, there 
are no resources currently allocated to do so.

Regards,

Jean-Sebastien

From: Daniel Begin [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: November 15, 2014 17:34
To: 'Darren Wiebe'
Cc: 'Talk-CA OpenStreetMap'
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

Well, since we do not have received any response/insurance from NRCan that the 
ftp site will keep running, I would like to have a backup location, just in 
case the official ftp site stops to provide data. I would be very sad if the 
data eventually ends up being no longer available.

However, since I used to be the NRCan contact (now retired), I wish to make 
clear that my answer is from an OSM user’s point of view, not an NRCan answer 
(official or not !-)

Best
Daniel

From: Darren Wiebe [mailto:dar...@aleph-com.net]
Sent: November-15-14 16:21
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: davis.christop...@gmail.commailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com; Talk-CA 
OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

Would it be acceptable to mirror the Canvec data in the FTP site?  I'd gladly 
put up the resources to serve up the data.

Darren Wiebe


First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no longer (never 
again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there are currently no resources 
allocated to work with the OSM community.

Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …

-  They are owned by the crown – I would be surprised they could/would 
be released to the public;

-  They were all developed with FME – a powerful tool – but you usually 
need to pay to get the appropriate licences…

Third, concerning potential “diffs” files …

-  There are some references to diffs files in talk-ca archives (some 
were even available for few NTS through ftp site)

-  Maybe diffs files are available for Canvec? I do not know.

Forth, my main concern is more about the sustained availability of the data in 
the ftp site ☹

Best,
Daniel


From: Chris Davis 
[mailto:davis.christop...@gmail.commailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com]
Sent: November-15-14 01:56
To: Darren Wiebe
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's 
vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as natural:wood) 
is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and other maps.

Chris

On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe 
dar...@aleph-com.netmailto:dar...@aleph-com.net wrote:
I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data.

Darren Wiebe

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew 
andrew.alli...@teksavvy.commailto:andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Hello List:

Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
format, I'm curious about:

1:  I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
2:  Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
available?
3:  Was there ever a program written to produce a diffs file?
4:  Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

Just throwing this out there.

Andrew
aka CanvecImports


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

2014-11-15 Thread Daniel Begin
Bonjour OSM lovers!

 

First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no longer (never 
again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there are currently no resources 
allocated to work with the OSM community.

 

Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …

-  They are owned by the crown – I would be surprised they could/would 
be released to the public;

-  They were all developed with FME – a powerful tool – but you usually 
need to pay to get the appropriate licences…

 

Third, concerning potential “diffs” files …

-  There are some references to diffs files in talk-ca archives (some 
were even available for few NTS through ftp site)

-  Maybe diffs files are available for Canvec? I do not know. 

 

Forth, my main concern is more about the sustained availability of the data in 
the ftp site L

 

Best,

Daniel

 

 

From: Chris Davis [mailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com] 
Sent: November-15-14 01:56
To: Darren Wiebe
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

 

I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's 
vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as natural:wood) 
is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and other maps.

 

Chris

 

On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe dar...@aleph-com.net wrote:

I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data. 

 

Darren Wiebe

 

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com wrote:

Hello List:

Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
format, I'm curious about:

1:  I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
2:  Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
available?
3:  Was there ever a program written to produce a diffs file?
4:  Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

Just throwing this out there.

Andrew
aka CanvecImports


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

2014-11-15 Thread Daniel Begin
Well, since we do not have received any response/insurance from NRCan that the 
ftp site will keep running, I would like to have a backup location, just in 
case the official ftp site stops to provide data. I would be very sad if the 
data eventually ends up being no longer available.

 

However, since I used to be the NRCan contact (now retired), I wish to make 
clear that my answer is from an OSM user’s point of view, not an NRCan answer 
(official or not !-)

 

Best

Daniel

 

From: Darren Wiebe [mailto:dar...@aleph-com.net] 
Sent: November-15-14 16:21
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: davis.christop...@gmail.com; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

 

Would it be acceptable to mirror the Canvec data in the FTP site?  I'd gladly 
put up the resources to serve up the data.

 

Darren Wiebe

 

 

First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no longer (never 
again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there are currently no resources 
allocated to work with the OSM community.

 

Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …

-  They are owned by the crown – I would be surprised they could/would 
be released to the public;

-  They were all developed with FME – a powerful tool – but you usually 
need to pay to get the appropriate licences…

 

Third, concerning potential “diffs” files …

-  There are some references to diffs files in talk-ca archives (some 
were even available for few NTS through ftp site)

-  Maybe diffs files are available for Canvec? I do not know. 

 

Forth, my main concern is more about the sustained availability of the data in 
the ftp site L

 

Best,

Daniel

 

 

From: Chris Davis [mailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com] 
Sent: November-15-14 01:56
To: Darren Wiebe
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

 

I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's 
vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as natural:wood) 
is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and other maps.

 

Chris

 

On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe dar...@aleph-com.net wrote:

I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data. 

 

Darren Wiebe

 

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com wrote:

Hello List:

Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
format, I'm curious about:

1:  I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
2:  Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
available?
3:  Was there ever a program written to produce a diffs file?
4:  Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

Just throwing this out there.

Andrew
aka CanvecImports


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 

 

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

2014-11-15 Thread Peuc
Hi guys,

I already have a mirror of the Canvec data, I will make public if/when
government data disappear.

However, feel free to make some other backups, just in case.

Pierre

Le 15/11/2014 17:33, Daniel Begin a écrit :

 Well, since we do not have received any response/insurance from NRCan
 that the ftp site will keep running, I would like to have a backup
 location, just in case the official ftp site stops to provide data. I
 would be very sad if the data eventually ends up being no longer
 available.

  

 However, since I used to be the NRCan contact (now retired), I wish to
 make clear that my answer is from an OSM user’s point of view, not an
 NRCan answer (official or not !-)

  

 Best

 Daniel

  

 *From:*Darren Wiebe [mailto:dar...@aleph-com.net]
 *Sent:* November-15-14 16:21
 *To:* Daniel Begin
 *Cc:* davis.christop...@gmail.com; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
 *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

  

 Would it be acceptable to mirror the Canvec data in the FTP site?  I'd
 gladly put up the resources to serve up the data.

  

 Darren Wiebe

  

  

 First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no
 longer (never again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there
 are currently no resources allocated to work with the OSM community.

  

 Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …

 -  They are owned by the crown – I would be surprised they
 could/would be released to the public;

 -  They were all developed with FME – a powerful tool –
 but you usually need to pay to get the appropriate licences…

  

 Third, concerning potential “diffs” files …

 -  There are some references to diffs files in talk-ca
 archives (some were even available for few NTS through ftp site)

 -  Maybe diffs files are available for Canvec? I do not know.

  

 Forth, my main concern is more about the sustained availability of
 the data in the ftp site L

  

 Best,

 Daniel

  

  

 *From:*Chris Davis [mailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com
 mailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* November-15-14 01:56
 *To:* Darren Wiebe
 *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
 *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

  

 I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well.
 BC's vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as
 natural:wood) is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM
 basemap and other maps.

  

 Chris

  

 On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe dar...@aleph-com.net
 mailto:dar...@aleph-com.net wrote:

 I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data. 

  

 *Darren Wiebe*

  

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew
 andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com mailto:andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com
 wrote:

 Hello List:

 Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be
 supplied in OSM
 format, I'm curious about:

 1:  I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
 2:  Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion
 still
 available?
 3:  Was there ever a program written to produce a diffs file?
 4:  Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

 Just throwing this out there.

 Andrew
 aka CanvecImports


 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

  


 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

  

  



 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

2014-11-14 Thread Darren Wiebe
I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data.

*Darren Wiebe*

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com wrote:

 Hello List:

 Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
 format, I'm curious about:

 1:  I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
 2:  Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
 available?
 3:  Was there ever a program written to produce a diffs file?
 4:  Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

 Just throwing this out there.

 Andrew
 aka CanvecImports


 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

2014-11-14 Thread Chris Davis
I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's
vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as
natural:wood) is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and
other maps.

Chris

On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe dar...@aleph-com.net wrote:

 I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data.

 *Darren Wiebe*

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com
 wrote:

 Hello List:

 Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
 format, I'm curious about:

 1:  I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
 2:  Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
 available?
 3:  Was there ever a program written to produce a diffs file?
 4:  Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

 Just throwing this out there.

 Andrew
 aka CanvecImports


 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca



 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca